[06:04] <lubot> <X> Without Qt 5.14 PySide2 will be missing it's tools (uic and rcc). 5.12 ones are not suitable. Although I can not predict how it will affect userbase and how many bug reports will follow. Maybe it's not critical at all
[07:23] <lubot> <X> https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-5.14.2-released
[07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qt5-ukui-platformtheme (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.0.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: accepted qt5-ukui-platformtheme [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1]
[11:57] <lubot> <tsimonq2> @RikMills [So sad as that may be, perhaps that nudges me in the 5.12.8 direction], I'm +1 on going with 5.12.8
[11:58] <lubot> <tsimonq2> I think that's the better option for an LTS
[12:01] <lubot> <RikMills> It would certainly be less controversial with the RT
[12:08] <lubot> <mitya57> Ok. And it should take less time to update, too.
[12:09] <lubot> <mitya57> https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qt5/+/295702 is currently integrating, when that is done we should have tarballs.
[12:10] <lubot> <mitya57> I will do the core part (bootstrapping docs and so on), if someone wants to help with the remaining Qt modules and rebuilds it would be welcomed.
[12:10] <lubot> <tsimonq2> @mitya57 [I will do the core part (bootstrapping docs and so on), if someone wants to help …], Do you want an Etherpad/CodiMD doc on one of the million instances?
[12:10] <lubot> <tsimonq2> We can coordinate there
[12:11] <lubot> <mitya57> For me this chat is fine, but Etherpad will work too
[12:12] <lubot> <tsimonq2> Can you edit this? https://notes.lubuntu.me/tg_BplIoS0eAAFoGZILdWQ#
[12:14] <lubot> <mitya57> Yes
[12:15] <lubot> <tsimonq2> Sounds good
[12:21] <lubot> <RikMills> Great :)