/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/04/01/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200331)00:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200331)00:26
wgrantThe problem seems to be network saturation in the clouds, but it's a bit weird.00:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-46.38~18.04.1]01:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-46.38~18.04.1]01:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-46.38~18.04.1]01:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1014.15~18.04.1] (no packageset)01:49
sarnoldwhat's the contents of these .list files? eg http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/bionic/daily-live/current/bionic-desktop-amd64.list -- there's only 44 lines with 'pool' in them, I expected far more than that many packages installed..02:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: logaricheck (focal-proposed/universe) [0.6.1-0ubuntu3 => 0.6.1-0ubuntu4] (no packageset)02:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted logaricheck [source] (focal-proposed) [0.6.1-0ubuntu4]02:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxd-agent-loader (focal-proposed/main) [0.3 => 0.4] (no packageset)03:00
mwhudsonsarnold: that's the files on the iso, mostly03:11
mwhudsonsarnold: the /pool/ is the package pool for things that can be installed by the installer (some dkms garbage usually)03:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (focal-proposed/main) [1.446 => 1.447] (core)03:12
stgraber^ the previous ubuntu-meta had the changelog entry generate for lxd-agent-loader but was missing the actual change somehow (not sure what happened with the update script), this one looks actually correct. Only affects server/cloud, I don't have an opinion on whether this should still make it for beta or be let in afterwards.03:12
sarnoldmwhudson: that's the funny thing though, half the packages there don't look useful, at least not to me :), and it's about 400 fewer than I expected..03:13
mwhudsonsarnold: the installer mostly does cp -a out of a squashfs03:13
sarnoldmwhudson: are these /pool/ files then packages that had to be replaced after the squash was squished?03:14
mwhudsonsarnold: no03:14
mwhudsonthey are extra stuff that the installer can choose to install03:14
mwhudsonthe random stuff is mostly from dkms being there03:14
mwhudsonsome are less random, e.g. grub-efi :)03:14
sarnoldthat one makes sense :)03:15
sarnoldfakeroot though, libasan..03:15
mwhudsonsarnold: gory details https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu.focal/ship-live03:16
sarnoldoh I'm sucker for ascii tables03:17
mwhudsonoh that's focal of course03:17
sarnoldthanks mwhudson ;)03:17
mwhudsonhttps://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu.bionic/ship-live <- bit smaller03:18
mwhudsonsarnold: these are the packages that are specified https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu.bionic/ship-live.seed03:18
sarnoldinteresting how that grows to include libasan :)03:19
cpaelzersil2100: Laney: I'll look for the chrony tests now (was EOD yesterday already when it came up)05:22
cpaelzerwe had fixes for "the new systemd" when the new one was 244, maybe we need soemthing for 245 now05:26
cpaelzerI'll let you know in a bit05:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1014.15~18.04.1]05:37
RAOFubuntu-archive: I've a question about dragonfly-reverb in the focal NEW queue. I've reviewed it, and it seems okaaaaaay, other than that it embeds a xxd'd copy of NotoSans in a source file, and it's not clear to me that this is kosher in a GPL-licensed binary. Has this been seen before?05:53
jibelLaney, can you have a look at bug 1869992? I think it's caused by the changes for oem enablement06:26
ubot5bug 1869992 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Ubiquity crashes during Kubuntu install on WIFI menu" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186999206:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: pgl-ddl-deploy (focal-proposed/primary) [1.7.0-1]06:51
handsome_fengHi, release team, could I upload qt5-ukui-platformtheme 1.0.2-0ubuntu1 which fix a crash bug found in today's daily test? Sorry for the inconvenience.06:51
seb128handsome_feng, hey, you can always upload, you don't need approval for that. You might ask for things to get reviewed/approved for beta once upload though06:55
handsome_fengseb128: Got it, Thanks!06:56
seb128np!06:56
handsome_fengThen, could someone help to upload it for me since the request for add it to packageset don't get response yet, :) PPA: https://launchpad.net/~feng-kylin/+archive/ubuntu/ukui-debian06:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qt5-ukui-platformtheme (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.0.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)07:26
RikMillshandsome_feng: ^07:28
handsome_fengRikMills: \o/07:29
cpaelzerhiho ubuntu-archive - pgl-ddl-deploy is in focal-new and would be the last remainder of the postgresql-11 removal in bug 1862601 to come back being postgresql-12 compatible now07:30
ubot5bug 1862601 in postgresql-11 (Ubuntu) "[Remove] Please remove postgresql-11 from Focal" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186260107:31
cpaelzerit is a leaf package and not seeded anywhere07:31
cpaelzerfrom an upgrader POV not having it in Focal is more of a "feature change" than getting this new version in07:31
cpaelzertherefore I wanted to ask if you agree and would accept this into focal?07:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gssproxy (focal-proposed/universe) [0.8.2-1 => 0.8.2-2] (no packageset) (sync)07:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gssproxy [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.8.2-2]07:36
sil2100I can look at it after the beta08:01
Laneyjibel: definitely!08:04
Laneyyou probably don't need to assign me bugs in multiple places though08:05
RikMillsI guess LP: #1869983 should be a dupe, even though no in the actual oem install?08:06
ubot5Launchpad bug 1869983 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Kubuntu 20.04 ubiquity installer crash" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186998308:06
=== Laney changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: Bionic 18.04.4, Eoan 19.10 | Beta Communicator: Laney | Archive: Beta Freeze | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Focal Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or gin | melius malum quod cognoscis
handsome_fengsil2100: Hi, Is it possible to accept qt5-ukui-platformtheme 1.0.2 into beta?08:07
sil2100handsome_feng: ok!08:07
handsome_fengThanks!08:07
sil2100handsome_feng: there is a possibility that we *might* be respinning, so I guess it could still get into the next batch - but we'll see08:08
handsome_fengsil2100: Fine, :)08:08
locutus_hello, can any AA please change force-badtest libsass/3.5.5-4/i386 into a versionless hint?08:09
RikMillssil2100: I guess you wouldn't allow a whole Plasma point release into the beta, LOL08:09
sil2100RikMills: I think *that* is a bit too much ;)08:11
RikMillsfigure so :)08:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qt5-ukui-platformtheme [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1]08:11
RikMillsbad upstream timing on that release. sigh...08:11
jibelLaney, yeah I added it to the gdoc for good measure but that's just duplicating what lp already knows08:14
Laneynod08:14
LaneyIt's a good idea to list the bugs there but maybe not the assignment too :p08:16
Laneyok, I've got a fix for ubiquity, just test building it and will upload08:30
sil2100\o/08:30
jibeland I've got a kernel panic08:31
* sil2100 doesn't know how to do a 'hands down' emote08:32
sil2100Oh, I know08:32
sil2100This one fits:08:32
sil2100 /o\08:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spectre-meltdown-checker (focal-proposed/universe) [0.43-2 => 0.43-3] (no packageset) (sync)08:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spectre-meltdown-checker [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.43-3]08:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lintian (focal-proposed/main) [2.59.0 => 2.59.0ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)08:39
rbalintlintian fixes the autpkgtest on armhf ^08:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.8 => 20.04.9] (core)08:42
Laneysil2100: ^- please do the review thing08:44
rbalintcpaelzer, re systemd vs chrony, there is 245.3 cooking in ppa:ci-train-ppa-service/3801 with a bigger ntp-related fix08:45
sil2100On it08:49
rbalintubuntu-archive also please unblock kodi LP: #186849908:50
ubot5Launchpad bug 1868499 in kodi (Ubuntu) " Please remove s390x binaries for 2:18.5+dfsg1-0ubuntu3 with all reverse dependencies" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186849908:50
rbalintsil2100, and uchardet :-)08:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.9]08:51
jibelsil2100, Laney bug 187006708:57
ubot5bug 1870067 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "ubiquity crashed with TypeError in enable_download_updates(): Argument 1 does not allow None as a value" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187006708:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spice-html5 (focal-proposed/universe) [0.1.7-4 => 0.2.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)09:00
jibelsil2100, could be a corrupted media again09:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spice-html5 [source] (focal-proposed) [0.2.2-0ubuntu1]09:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: salt (focal-proposed/universe) [3000+dfsg1-3 => 3000+dfsg1-4] (no packageset) (sync)09:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted salt [sync] (focal-proposed) [3000+dfsg1-4]09:02
sil2100jibel: ok, give me a sign if you see the same issue on that other USB stick09:04
sil2100I'll unblock ubiquity and qt5-ukui-platformtheme in the meantime09:07
sil2100rbalint: will re-look when I have a moment!09:08
LaneyWe'll definitely be respinning everything with ubiquity on it, just to be clear09:18
cpaelzerrbalint: good to know, but it might be more subtle09:21
cpaelzerrbalint: all retries I have o far work09:21
cpaelzers390x/ppc were fixed by retries (this was never flaky before)09:22
cpaelzerI'm still looking for a place that reproduces the remaining issue (on x86)09:23
jamespagemorning09:26
jamespageplease could python-openstacksdk 0.45.0-0ubuntu2 be accepted into focal - it resolves the current FTBFS for this package and unblocks a dep-wait for senlin in universe09:27
sil2100Does anyone have a few cycles to check LP: #1869928, possibly on real hardware?09:38
ubot5Launchpad bug 1869928 in Ubuntu Studio "Ubuntu Studio 20.04 ISO Boot Issue" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186992809:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: subdownloader (focal-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-2 => 2.1.0-3] (no packageset) (sync)09:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted subdownloader [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.1.0-3]09:57
jamespagealso I need a release team ack to push nova-spiceproxy to the supported-misc-servers seed to support MIR bug 110893510:03
ubot5bug 1108935 in spice-html5 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] websockify, spice-html5" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/110893510:03
jamespageplease :)10:03
sil2100Oh noes, was able to reproduce LP: #1869928 on kvm10:05
ubot5Launchpad bug 1869928 in Ubuntu Studio "Ubuntu Studio 20.04 ISO Boot Issue" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186992810:05
sil2100Eickmeyer: ^10:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-magcode-core (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5.4-1 => 1.5.4-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)10:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-magcode-core [source] (focal-proposed) [1.5.4-1ubuntu1]10:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-magcode-core (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5.4-1ubuntu1 => 1.5.4-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)10:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-magcode-core [source] (focal-proposed) [1.5.4-1ubuntu2]10:15
sil2100We're looking into that bug, as it might have been our changes that caused the regression10:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rapidjson (focal-proposed/universe) [1.1.0+dfsg2-5 => 1.1.0+dfsg2-5ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)10:25
LaneyI've looked into the ubuntustudio failure10:29
LaneyWe think it was caused by the recent debian-cd changes10:29
Laneyand have a proposed fix, going to try it now10:29
Laneyjuliank: ^- fyi ;-)10:29
juliankok10:30
Laneyhardcoding generic at line 159 was wrong for studio10:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: reptyr (focal-proposed/universe) [0.6.2-1.2 => 0.6.2-1.2ubuntu1] (no packageset)10:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted reptyr [source] (focal-proposed) [0.6.2-1.2ubuntu1]10:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sabnzbdplus (focal-proposed/multiverse) [2.3.6+dfsg-1build1 => 2.3.6+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)10:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: seqan (focal-proposed/universe) [1.4.2+dfsg-3 => 1.4.2+dfsg-4] (no packageset) (sync)10:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sabnzbdplus [source] (focal-proposed) [2.3.6+dfsg-1ubuntu1]10:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted seqan [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.4.2+dfsg-4]10:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401)10:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: signing-party (focal-proposed/universe) [2.10-2 => 2.10-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)10:43
juliankLaney: oh, do they use lowlatency?10:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted signing-party [source] (focal-proposed) [2.10-2ubuntu1]10:43
sil2100juliank: yes, the only flavour IIRC10:44
Laneyyus10:44
* sil2100 waits for his mirror to get updated10:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sugar-toolkit-gtk3 (focal-proposed/universe) [0.116-5 => 0.116-5ubuntu1] (no packageset)10:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sugar-toolkit-gtk3 [source] (focal-proposed) [0.116-5ubuntu1]10:53
Laneysil2100: can haz images10:53
sil2100Iz working?10:55
jibelsil2100, everything looks fine on build 20200331 for Ubuntu. I'll redo a round of tests when we get the new image.10:55
Laneysure is!10:57
sil2100Sweet! Confirmed here as well10:59
sil2100Eickmeyer: ^ ubuntustudio should now have a booting iso again10:59
jbichalocutus__: did you see https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/03/31/%23ubuntu-release.html#t20:08 ?11:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sugar-toolkit-gtk3 [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.116-5ubuntu1] (no packageset)11:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjade (focal-proposed/universe) [1.4devel1-21.3build1 => 1.4devel1-21.3ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-budgie, ubuntukylin)11:06
cpaelzerI asked this morning already, but let me re-ask now with more people being around11:09
cpaelzerubuntu-archive - pgl-ddl-deploy is in focal-new and would be the last remainder of the postgresql-11 removal in bug 1862601 to come back being postgresql-12 compatible now11:09
ubot5bug 1862601 in postgresql-11 (Ubuntu) "[Remove] Please remove postgresql-11 from Focal" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186260111:09
cpaelzerit is a leaf package and not seeded anywhere11:10
cpaelzerfrom an upgrader POV not having it in Focal is more of a "feature change" than getting this new version in11:10
cpaelzertherefore I wanted to ask if you agree and would accept this into focal?11:10
tjaaltoncould someone ack xf86-input-wacom from the bionic queue, it's been there for three weeks11:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: syslog-summary (focal-proposed/universe) [1.14-2.1build1 => 1.14-2.1ubuntu1] (no packageset)11:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted syslog-summary [source] (focal-proposed) [1.14-2.1ubuntu1]11:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: teeworlds (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-5build1 => 0.7.2-5ubuntu1] (no packageset)11:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted teeworlds [source] (focal-proposed) [0.7.2-5ubuntu1]11:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: telepathy-glib (focal-proposed/universe) [0.24.1-2 => 0.24.1-2ubuntu1] (kubuntu)11:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: telepathy-idle (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-2build1 => 0.2.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)11:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted telepathy-idle [source] (focal-proposed) [0.2.0-2ubuntu1]11:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: telepathy-rakia (focal-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-3build1 => 0.8.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)11:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted telepathy-rakia [source] (focal-proposed) [0.8.0-3ubuntu1]11:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: timew (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1build1 => 1.2.0-2] (no packageset) (sync)11:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted timew [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.2.0-2]11:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: telepathy-ring (focal-proposed/universe) [2.3.24-1 => 2.3.24-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)11:35
sil2100Ok, so while we're waiting for ubiquity to migrate, we still have LP: #1865027 as a blocker, but it's being worked on right now11:35
ubot5Launchpad bug 1865027 in subiquity "focal-arm64 install fails. No space left on device on /target" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186502711:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted telepathy-ring [source] (focal-proposed) [2.3.24-1ubuntu1]11:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: traitlets (focal-proposed/universe) [4.3.3-2 => 4.3.3-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)11:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted traitlets [source] (focal-proposed) [4.3.3-2ubuntu1]11:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: uftrace (focal-proposed/universe) [0.9.3-1 => 0.9.3-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)11:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wims-help (focal-proposed/universe) [4.01-3 => 4.01-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)11:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted uftrace [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.3-1ubuntu1]11:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wims-help [source] (focal-proposed) [4.01-3ubuntu1]11:52
locutus__jbicha, ack thanks11:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: x86info (focal-proposed/universe) [1.31~pre0.8052aabdd159bc9050e7dc264f33782c5acce05f-1build1 => 1.31~pre0.8052aabdd159bc9050e7dc264f33782c5acce05f-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)11:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted x86info [source] (focal-proposed) [1.31~pre0.8052aabdd159bc9050e7dc264f33782c5acce05f-1ubuntu1]11:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yasm (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-2build1 => 1.3.0-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)12:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (focal-proposed/main) [2.13.3-7ubuntu2 => 2.13.3-7ubuntu3] (core, i386-whitelist)12:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zsnapd (focal-proposed/universe) [0.8.10b-1 => 0.8.11h-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)12:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zsnapd [source] (focal-proposed) [0.8.11h-1ubuntu1]12:05
LaneyOK, now that ubiquity 20.04.9 is in focal, I'm going to respin all of the flavours that have it on12:06
Laneystand by12:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zziplib (focal-proposed/universe) [0.13.62-3.2 => 0.13.62-3.2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)12:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgl-ddl-deploy [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.7.0-1]12:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sugar-toolkit-gtk3 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.116-5ubuntu1]12:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-grape-logging [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.8.3-1]12:13
bdmurraysil2100: How often does the "ISO Testing Notification" job run? I just got an email about the 20200331 image which seems late.12:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgl-ddl-deploy [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1] (no packageset)12:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgl-ddl-deploy [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1] (no packageset)12:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgl-ddl-deploy [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1] (no packageset)12:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgl-ddl-deploy [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1] (no packageset)12:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgl-ddl-deploy [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1] (no packageset)12:31
sil2100bdmurray: hm, I need to check, I think not too frequently, I think this was set up more for dailies12:38
sil2100Laney: \o/12:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bubblewrap (focal-proposed/main) [0.4.0-1ubuntu3 => 0.4.0-1ubuntu4] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntugnome)12:42
tjaaltonbdmurray: hi, could you check xf86-input-wacom bionic sru again to see if my explanation is enough?12:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgl-ddl-deploy [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.7.0-1]13:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgl-ddl-deploy [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.7.0-1]13:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgl-ddl-deploy [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.7.0-1]13:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgl-ddl-deploy [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.7.0-1]13:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgl-ddl-deploy [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.7.0-1]13:06
bdmurraysil2100: Could you help with a 2nd opinion on bug 1774242?13:06
ubot5bug 1774242 in OEM Priority Project "Wacom touchscreens should disable gestures" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/177424213:06
sil2100bdmurray: looking13:06
bdmurrayThanks!13:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401)13:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401)13:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server ppc64el [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401)13:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server s390x [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401)13:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401)13:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401)13:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401.1)13:21
bdmurraytjaalton: What behavior difference will Cinnamon users have if this change lands?13:27
bdmurrayThe description just says "feature regression" which isn't very specific.13:27
tjaaltonthat was based on upstream assumptions13:29
sil2100Since I was wondering how much worse will it be for users13:30
tjaaltonit's been in focal from the start13:30
sil2100Like, will touch completely stop working for them?13:30
sil2100Yeah, but if there's a feature regression possible for existing users in bionic, I'd like to understand a bit better what upstream meant by that13:31
tjaaltonmost touchscreens use libinput13:31
tjaaltonI'd say13:31
tjaaltonhttps://github.com/linuxmint/cinnamon/issues/549713:32
gitbotlinuxmint issue 5497 in cinnamon "Touch Screen support." [Feature Request, Closed]13:32
tjaaltonthat says 'install touchegg'13:32
tjaaltonand no, it wouldn't completely stop working, just no gestures where they were previously provided by wacom13:34
bdmurrayDoes that mean a subset of gestures would be available?13:35
tjaaltondepends on the desktop. gnome handles them natively, for instance13:35
tjaaltoncinnamon itself doesn't provide any13:35
bdmurraysil2100: What do you think? Maybe accept but let it age for quite a while?13:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-1017.18]13:46
sil2100bdmurray: I guess this might be an option - maybe we could also ask flavors for help? They could give the -proposed packages a spin and assess on how big of an impact does it actually have on their users13:50
bdmurraysil2100: Do you think we should reach out to the flavors or tjaalton?13:51
sil2100bdmurray: it makes most sense for it to be the uploader's responsibility13:53
tjaaltonI can ask binli to test cinnamon on bionic. it's what Mint has aiui, so they have some users13:53
sil2100Guess an e-mail to ubuntu-flavors@ could be enough?13:53
tjaaltonor that13:54
bdmurrayor both!13:54
tjaalton:)13:54
sil2100Both would be lovely!13:54
sil2100;)13:54
sil2100tjaalton: thanks o/13:54
* RikMills glares at kubuntu iso build14:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401)14:01
sil2100Things are still slow, Laney is discussing with IS what could be the real deal here14:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xf86-input-wacom [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:0.36.1-0ubuntu1.1]14:04
bdmurray"the real deal"14:05
Laneyah yes14:06
Laneylet's update...14:06
=== Laney changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: Bionic 18.04.4, Eoan 19.10 | Beta Communicator: sil2100 | Archive: Beta Freeze | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Focal Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or gin | melius malum quod cognoscis
LaneyThe builds will finish eventually but we would like performance to be more like normal if possible14:07
tjaaltonsil2100, bdmurray: ty :)14:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401)14:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401)14:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401)14:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: telepathy-glib (focal-proposed/universe) [0.24.1-2 => 0.24.1-2ubuntu1] (kubuntu)14:24
sil2100RikMills: kubuntu done! This time I think you should be able to get further in the installation process ;p14:26
RikMillssil2100: I did a very quick test on that last iso in the VM, updating ubiquity, and it succeeded14:27
RikMillstaking ages to sync to cdimage, but that happens14:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: aptdaemon (focal-proposed/main) [1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu31 => 1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu32] (desktop-core)14:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sassc (focal-proposed/universe) [3.5.0-1 => 3.6.1-2] (i386-whitelist) (sync)14:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt-clone (focal-proposed/main) [0.4.1ubuntu2 => 0.4.1ubuntu3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)14:53
locutus_can any AA please do some NBS-proposed cleanup? missing build on amd64: rabbitvcs-thunar14:54
locutus_it is in proposed, but not sure why itsn't automatically cleaned it up because there is no rabbitvcs in release pocket14:55
locutus_jbicha, ^^14:55
jibelLaney, can you have a look at bug 187014715:03
ubot5bug 1870147 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "kubuntu 20200401 installation crashes with dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.NetworkManager.Settings.PermissionDenied: uid 1000 has no permission to perform this operation" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187014715:03
jibel?15:03
sil2100This bug is not very descriptive15:06
sil2100jibel: when is this crash happening? How can we reproduce?15:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt-clone (focal-proposed/main) [0.4.1ubuntu2 => 0.4.1ubuntu3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)15:07
bdmurrayBut is it destructive?15:07
jibelsil2100, I asked the OP more info.15:08
vorlonlocutus_: NBS-proposed never gets cleaned up automatically15:09
vorlonlocutus_: done15:10
vorlonlocutus_: I think you missed my comment yesterday about libsass due to disconnect.  If libsass's test-depends switched to depending on ruby:any, and libsass itself changed its test dependency to ruby:native, I believe this should work; however I can't test locally because sass-spec-data contains non-normalized utf8 directory names, which causes dpkg to fail to unpack it on a ZFS filesystem. :P15:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager-fortisslvpn (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.8-2 => 1.2.10-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)15:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted network-manager-fortisslvpn [source] (focal-proposed) [1.2.10-0ubuntu1]15:18
LaneyRelease noting bug #187001815:31
ubot5bug 1870018 in casper (Ubuntu) "Option (Ctrl-C) not shown to disable ISO verification" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187001815:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: swig3.0 (focal-proposed/primary) [3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1]15:35
rbalintvorlon, could you please clean up LP: #1868499 , too?15:36
ubot5Launchpad bug 1868499 in kodi (Ubuntu) " Please remove s390x binaries for 2:18.5+dfsg1-0ubuntu3 with all reverse dependencies" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186849915:36
vorlonrbalint: yes, looking at it now15:40
vorlonrbalint: there are reverse-build-depends on kodi that build on s390x (kodi-addons-dev).  Can you analyze these and feed me a list of what needs removed from other sources, confirming that they also have no revdeps?15:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nodejs (focal-proposed/universe) [10.17.0~dfsg-2ubuntu6 => 10.19.0~dfsg-3ubuntu1] (kubuntu)15:41
rbalintvorlon, i've listed them all in the bug15:42
vorlonrbalint: kodi-pvr-argustv has xbmc-pvr-argustv as a revdep and is built on s390x15:43
vorlonso you haven't recursed the revdeps15:43
rbalintvorlon, hm, i did recurse, but missed those xbmc ones15:45
rbalintvorlon, thanks, i'll update the list15:45
xnoxnow that we have blacklists/whitelists in launchpad, maybe we can make s390x to be a partial port too?15:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: capnproto (focal-proposed/main) [0.7.0-5build1 => 0.7.0-6] (ubuntu-desktop)15:47
vorlonxnox: I don't believe it would be less overhead than the current approach15:50
vorlonxnox: we basically only remove stuff once it ftbfs and impacts its revdeps, putting those into a blacklist in addition to removing the binaries would be more overhead15:50
sil2100mwhudson: hey! Once you're around (not sure if you got pinged about this already), could you take a look at LP: #1865027 ? We suspect it might be something wrong with probert, at least that's how it looks like15:53
ubot5Launchpad bug 1865027 in subiquity "focal-arm64 install fails. No space left on device on /target" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186502715:53
sil2100Status update regarding beta: we are still waiting for all rebuilds to finish uploading, we still have one subiquity-related blocker on our radar (details above ^), but most likely this will not require respinning the whole world15:55
sil2100So please proceed with testing of those images that rebuilt already15:55
sil2100(I think we still waiting for desktop)15:55
bdmurrayI'm testing RPi arm64!15:55
sil2100\o/15:56
plarssame16:28
plarsand armhf of course16:28
plarsbdmurray: which device(s)?16:30
bdmurrayplars: oh, that's right Pi4 right now16:30
plarsbdmurray: I've 1/2GB pi4 on armhf/arm64, moving on to 4GB next. I have automated results for *almost* everything else, but I want to at check sanity with everything on local devices too16:31
plarscm3-arm64 is giving me grief for automated tests we run though, because all the dependencies fills up the tiny 4GB emmc on the device :/16:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yasm (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-2build1 => 1.3.0-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)16:47
locutus_vorlon, I got reminded already by j_bicha and I did upload them in my ppa already https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+packages17:01
locutus_this is the trigger I'm testing right now https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=focal&arch=i386&package=libsass&ppa=costamagnagianfranco/locutusofborg-ppa&trigger=sass-spec/3.5.4-2ubuntu1&trigger=libsass/3.6.3-1ubuntu1&trigger=sassc/3.6.1-2&trigger=ruby-sass/3.7.4-1ubuntu1&all-proposed=117:01
vorlonlocutus_: ok17:01
locutus_vorlon, https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal-costamagnagianfranco-locutusofborg-ppa/focal/i386/libs/libsass/20200401_170419_456fb@/log.gz17:05
locutus_I can't make it work17:05
locutus_patced sass-spec, ruby-sass, libsass, and no improvement17:05
vorlonlocutus_: since sass-spec and sass-spec-data are Architecture: all, they also need to either be marked Multi-Arch: foreign, or the test deps need to be annotated :native17:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openwsman (focal-proposed/universe) [2.6.5-0ubuntu4 => 2.6.5-0ubuntu5] (no packageset)17:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openwsman [source] (focal-proposed) [2.6.5-0ubuntu5]17:27
=== Laney changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: Bionic 18.04.4, Eoan 19.10 | Beta Communicator: bdmurray | Archive: Beta Freeze | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Focal Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or gin | melius malum quod cognoscis
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hp-ppd (focal-proposed/universe) [0.9ubuntu2+really-0.2ubuntu1 => 0.9ubuntu2+really-0.2ubuntu2] (no packageset)17:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hp-ppd [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9ubuntu2+really-0.2ubuntu2]17:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: telepathy-glib (focal-proposed/universe) [0.24.1-2 => 0.24.1-2ubuntu1] (kubuntu)17:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdeconnect (focal-proposed/universe) [1.4-0ubuntu3 => 1.4-0ubuntu4] (kubuntu)17:57
RikMills^ not needed for the beta17:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: folder-color (focal-proposed/universe) [0.0.86-0ubuntu2 => 0.0.86-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-mate)17:58
bdmurrayRikMills: Is there anything you can add to the Beta Release notes about Kubuntu?17:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sundials (focal-proposed/universe) [3.1.2+dfsg-3build5 => 3.1.2+dfsg-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)18:02
RikMillsbdmurray: yes, there will be. where are the ubuntu ones?18:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sundials [source] (focal-proposed) [3.1.2+dfsg-3ubuntu1]18:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected telepathy-glib [source] (focal-proposed) [0.24.1-2ubuntu1]18:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected folder-color [source] (focal-proposed) [0.0.86-0ubuntu3]18:16
RikMillsbdmurray: bare bones are now @ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FocalFossa/Beta/Kubuntu18:17
RikMillswill polish that up by release time18:17
bdmurraythanks18:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected apt-clone [source] (focal-proposed) [0.4.1ubuntu3]18:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sass-spec (focal-proposed/universe) [3.5.4-2 => 3.5.4-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)18:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sass-spec [source] (focal-proposed) [3.5.4-2ubuntu1]18:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-sass (focal-proposed/universe) [3.7.4-1 => 3.7.4-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)18:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-sass [source] (focal-proposed) [3.7.4-1ubuntu1]18:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libsass (focal-proposed/universe) [3.6.3-1 => 3.6.3-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)18:26
mwhudsonsil2100: yeah18:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected yasm [source] (focal-proposed) [1.3.0-2ubuntu1]18:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-snapshot (focal-proposed/universe) [1:20200124-1ubuntu1 => 1:20200401-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)19:03
locutus_ubuntu-archive please accept libsass? I fixed the multiarch i386 autopkgtest sadness19:07
sil2100mwhudson: thank you!19:10
sil2100:)19:10
sil2100wow, desktop arm64 still didn't get uploaded19:12
sil2100Actually, scratch that, I see the livefs build succeeded 19 minutes ago!19:13
bdmurray"Uploading build"19:13
bdmurray"Successfully built"!19:17
sil2100This is a new record!19:20
sil2100;)19:20
dokois it intended that the packages in i386-whitelist land in the unapproved queue?19:20
dokosil2100: ^^^19:20
dokoanyway, accepted gcc-snapshot19:22
sil2100doko: they shouldn't, but the bot needs to be updated - not sure if we had anyone actioned to do it yet19:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401)19:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401)19:22
sil2100I just remember L_aney talking about it19:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-snapshot [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20200401-1ubuntu1]19:22
dokook, then I'll accept those19:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libsass [source] (focal-proposed) [3.6.3-1ubuntu1]19:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yasm [source] (focal-proposed) [1.3.0-2ubuntu1]19:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sassc [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.6.1-2]19:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pikepdf [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.10.3+dfsg-1]19:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wine-development [source] (focal-proposed) [5.5-1ubuntu1]19:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rapidjson [source] (focal-proposed) [1.1.0+dfsg2-5ubuntu1]19:25
rafaeldtinocohello. I have 1 important and another one .. medium important FFe opened. would u like to highlight them here to see if they can be reviewed19:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cwiid [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.6.00+svn201-5]19:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lintian [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.61.0]19:26
rafaeldtinocoimportant one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/resource-agents/+bug/186638319:26
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1866383 in resource-agents (Ubuntu) "[FFe][Focal] resource-agents need fixes from recent release upstream version" [Undecided,New]19:26
rafaeldtinocosemi-important one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kronosnet/+bug/186638519:26
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1866385 in kronosnet (Ubuntu) "[FFe][focal] kronosnet need fixes from just released upstream version" [Medium,New]19:26
bdmurrayOkay, now Ubuntu Desktop amd64 rebuild is available. Get testing!19:29
juliankdoko: fyi, i did upload the apt-clone and aptdaemon ftbfs fixes earlier today. I'm not super sure about aptdaemon because it's test suite runs too long and I cancelled it, but it at least built :)19:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (focal-proposed/main) [156 => 157] (ubuntu-desktop)19:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fence-agents [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.25-2ubuntu1.1]20:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pacemaker [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.18-0ubuntu1.2]20:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd-signed (focal-proposed/main) [1.26 => 1.27] (core)20:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: phpmyadmin (focal-proposed/universe) [4:4.9.5+dfsg1-1ubuntu1 => 4:4.9.5+dfsg1-2] (no packageset) (sync)20:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted phpmyadmin [sync] (focal-proposed) [4:4.9.5+dfsg1-2]20:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wine-development (focal-proposed/universe) [5.5-1ubuntu1 => 5.5-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)20:21
locutus_please don't accept wine until the current one migrates :)20:28
mclemenceaucd20:32
locutus_~20:32
rbalintvorlon, i've updated the kodi s390x removal bug20:47
Eickmeyersil2100: Can you spare a cycle to look at https://launchpad.net/bubblemail? It would be an entirely NEW package that works in the spirit of mailnag.20:49
Eickmeyerteward and I have been working on this one.20:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tor (focal-proposed/universe) [0.4.2.6-1 => 0.4.2.7-1] (no packageset) (sync)20:51
EickmeyerNot intended for any seed.20:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tor [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.4.2.7-1]20:51
EickmeyerNo rdeps.20:54
Laneybdmurray: thanks for following up with IS21:09
bdmurrayLaney: no problem21:10
vorlonrbalint: somehow I still don't see any xbmc on there?21:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: picard (focal-proposed/universe) [2.3-1 => 2.3.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)21:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted picard [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.3.1-1]21:18
seb128fossfreedom, hey, I've sponsored you slideshow fix but you should probably ask to r-t people here if you want it to be considered, especially that you didn't attach any bug report or anything that would help with judging the importance of the fix21:23
vorlonrbalint: ah I see you have a separate bug for xbmc21:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: murano-agent (focal-proposed/universe) [1:5.0.0~b1~git2019121815.2b2cc45-0ubuntu4 => 1:5.0.0~b1~git2019121815.2b2cc45-0ubuntu5] (no packageset)21:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted murano-agent [source] (focal-proposed) [1:5.0.0~b1~git2019121815.2b2cc45-0ubuntu5]21:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (focal-proposed/universe) [3.0.4-0ubuntu3 => 4.0.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)21:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lxc [source] (focal-proposed) [4.0.0-0ubuntu1]21:50
=== bdmurray changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: Bionic 18.04.4, Eoan 19.10 | Beta Communicator: None | Archive: Beta Freeze | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Focal Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or gin | melius malum quod cognoscis
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: bubblemail (focal-proposed/primary) [0.5-0ubuntu1]21:57
Wimpressvorlon: Is it expected that nvidia drivers are build DKMS modules in 20.04?21:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (focal-proposed/universe) [3.0.4-0ubuntu3 => 1:4.0.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)22:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxc [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.0.0-0ubuntu1]22:02
vorlonWimpress: >_<22:06
WimpressI ask, because that is what happened during updates today. Which caused a kernel panic.22:07
vorlonWimpress: the kernel pieces have landed such that ubuntu-drivers should not /need/ to pull in nvidia-dkms-$ver.  However I don't know if ubuntu-drivers does the correct thing yet22:07
WimpressCurrent status:22:07
Wimpresshttps://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/tpThF7NA/IMG_20200401_230526.jpg22:07
vorlon"during updates" so this was an already installed system, not a fresh install?22:07
WimpressYes, already install 20.04.22:07
=== mruffell_ is now known as mruffell
WimpressHas been on 20.04 for months.22:08
WimpressApplying daily updates.22:08
vorlonWimpress: a kernel panic is a strange outcome of compiling kernel modules.22:08
WimpressI agree 🙂22:08
vorlonWimpress: but also if this wasn't a fresh install, you might well have installed at a time when nvidia-dkms was the only option22:09
vorlonafter you recover you could check what happens if you apt purge nvidia-dkms-44022:09
WimpressSystem load is 1622:09
WimpressWhile attempting to build DKMS modules which are in a segfault loop.22:09
vorloncute22:09
vorlonwell kill all of that with fire22:09
WimpressYes. I'll do the 440 purge and gather info.22:10
WimpressSo, try and remove DKMS now?22:10
tewardubuntu-archive: No rush but if you get bored or have ten minutes to review bubblemail that'd be great.  There's an in-the-works process in Debian to get it into Debian so until then we're using -0ubuntuX notations on the bubblemail packages.  (Eickmeyer would like this to be available for focal, himself, and it's not going to be seeded anywhere.)22:15
tewardbut *no rush*22:15
teward*lurks*22:15
EickmeyerThere is a corresponding gnome shell extension that the upstream would like packaged at some point, but that can wait.22:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireguard-linux-compat (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.20200330-1ubuntu1 => 1.0.20200401-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)22:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireguard-linux-compat [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.20200401-1ubuntu1]22:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cgit (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.1+git2.18.0-1 => 1.2.3+git2.25.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)22:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: telegram-desktop (focal-proposed/universe) [1.9.21+ds-1 => 2.0.1+ds-1] (no packageset) (sync)22:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted telegram-desktop [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.0.1+ds-1]22:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cgit [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.2.3+git2.25.1-1]22:49
Wimpressvorlon: attempting to remove nvidia-dkms-440 want to remove the entirety of the nvidia drivers.23:01
WimpressRunning 'ubuntu-drivers autoinstall' is pulling in nvidia-dkms-440'23:11
=== tumbleweed_ is now known as tumbleweed
WimpressThe 390, 435 and 440 drivers all segfault while attempting to build DKMS modules. Net result, currently impossible to install nvidia drivers.23:39
WimpressI've captured some logs and crash reports23:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: stress-ng (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.05-1 => 0.11.07-1] (no packageset) (sync)23:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted stress-ng [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.11.07-1]23:56

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!