[00:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200331)
[00:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200331)
[00:29] <wgrant> The problem seems to be network saturation in the clouds, but it's a bit weird.
[01:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-46.38~18.04.1]
[01:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-46.38~18.04.1]
[01:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-46.38~18.04.1]
[01:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1014.15~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[02:08] <sarnold> what's the contents of these .list files? eg http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/bionic/daily-live/current/bionic-desktop-amd64.list -- there's only 44 lines with 'pool' in them, I expected far more than that many packages installed..
[02:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: logaricheck (focal-proposed/universe) [0.6.1-0ubuntu3 => 0.6.1-0ubuntu4] (no packageset)
[02:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted logaricheck [source] (focal-proposed) [0.6.1-0ubuntu4]
[03:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxd-agent-loader (focal-proposed/main) [0.3 => 0.4] (no packageset)
[03:11] <mwhudson> sarnold: that's the files on the iso, mostly
[03:11] <mwhudson> sarnold: the /pool/ is the package pool for things that can be installed by the installer (some dkms garbage usually)
[03:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (focal-proposed/main) [1.446 => 1.447] (core)
[03:12] <stgraber> ^ the previous ubuntu-meta had the changelog entry generate for lxd-agent-loader but was missing the actual change somehow (not sure what happened with the update script), this one looks actually correct. Only affects server/cloud, I don't have an opinion on whether this should still make it for beta or be let in afterwards.
[03:13] <sarnold> mwhudson: that's the funny thing though, half the packages there don't look useful, at least not to me :), and it's about 400 fewer than I expected..
[03:13] <mwhudson> sarnold: the installer mostly does cp -a out of a squashfs
[03:14] <sarnold> mwhudson: are these /pool/ files then packages that had to be replaced after the squash was squished?
[03:14] <mwhudson> sarnold: no
[03:14] <mwhudson> they are extra stuff that the installer can choose to install
[03:14] <mwhudson> the random stuff is mostly from dkms being there
[03:14] <mwhudson> some are less random, e.g. grub-efi :)
[03:15] <sarnold> that one makes sense :)
[03:15] <sarnold> fakeroot though, libasan..
[03:16] <mwhudson> sarnold: gory details https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu.focal/ship-live
[03:17] <sarnold> oh I'm sucker for ascii tables
[03:17] <mwhudson> oh that's focal of course
[03:17] <sarnold> thanks mwhudson ;)
[03:18] <mwhudson> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu.bionic/ship-live <- bit smaller
[03:18] <mwhudson> sarnold: these are the packages that are specified https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu.bionic/ship-live.seed
[03:19] <sarnold> interesting how that grows to include libasan :)
[05:22] <cpaelzer> sil2100: Laney: I'll look for the chrony tests now (was EOD yesterday already when it came up)
[05:26] <cpaelzer> we had fixes for "the new systemd" when the new one was 244, maybe we need soemthing for 245 now
[05:26] <cpaelzer> I'll let you know in a bit
[05:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1014.15~18.04.1]
[05:53] <RAOF> ubuntu-archive: I've a question about dragonfly-reverb in the focal NEW queue. I've reviewed it, and it seems okaaaaaay, other than that it embeds a xxd'd copy of NotoSans in a source file, and it's not clear to me that this is kosher in a GPL-licensed binary. Has this been seen before?
[06:26] <jibel> Laney, can you have a look at bug 1869992? I think it's caused by the changes for oem enablement
[06:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: pgl-ddl-deploy (focal-proposed/primary) [1.7.0-1]
[06:51] <handsome_feng> Hi, release team, could I upload qt5-ukui-platformtheme 1.0.2-0ubuntu1 which fix a crash bug found in today's daily test? Sorry for the inconvenience.
[06:55] <seb128> handsome_feng, hey, you can always upload, you don't need approval for that. You might ask for things to get reviewed/approved for beta once upload though
[06:56] <handsome_feng> seb128: Got it, Thanks!
[06:56] <seb128> np!
[06:59] <handsome_feng> Then, could someone help to upload it for me since the request for add it to packageset don't get response yet, :) PPA: https://launchpad.net/~feng-kylin/+archive/ubuntu/ukui-debian
[07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qt5-ukui-platformtheme (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.0.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[07:28] <RikMills> handsome_feng: ^
[07:29] <handsome_feng> RikMills: \o/
[07:30] <cpaelzer> hiho ubuntu-archive - pgl-ddl-deploy is in focal-new and would be the last remainder of the postgresql-11 removal in bug 1862601 to come back being postgresql-12 compatible now
[07:31] <cpaelzer> it is a leaf package and not seeded anywhere
[07:31] <cpaelzer> from an upgrader POV not having it in Focal is more of a "feature change" than getting this new version in
[07:31] <cpaelzer> therefore I wanted to ask if you agree and would accept this into focal?
[07:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gssproxy (focal-proposed/universe) [0.8.2-1 => 0.8.2-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[07:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gssproxy [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.8.2-2]
[08:01] <sil2100> I can look at it after the beta
[08:04] <Laney> jibel: definitely!
[08:05] <Laney> you probably don't need to assign me bugs in multiple places though
[08:06] <RikMills> I guess LP: #1869983 should be a dupe, even though no in the actual oem install?
[08:07] <handsome_feng> sil2100: Hi, Is it possible to accept qt5-ukui-platformtheme 1.0.2 into beta?
[08:07] <sil2100> handsome_feng: ok!
[08:07] <handsome_feng> Thanks!
[08:08] <sil2100> handsome_feng: there is a possibility that we *might* be respinning, so I guess it could still get into the next batch - but we'll see
[08:08] <handsome_feng> sil2100: Fine, :)
[08:09] <locutus_> hello, can any AA please change force-badtest libsass/3.5.5-4/i386 into a versionless hint?
[08:09] <RikMills> sil2100: I guess you wouldn't allow a whole Plasma point release into the beta, LOL
[08:11] <sil2100> RikMills: I think *that* is a bit too much ;)
[08:11] <RikMills> figure so :)
[08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qt5-ukui-platformtheme [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1]
[08:11] <RikMills> bad upstream timing on that release. sigh...
[08:14] <jibel> Laney, yeah I added it to the gdoc for good measure but that's just duplicating what lp already knows
[08:14] <Laney> nod
[08:16] <Laney> It's a good idea to list the bugs there but maybe not the assignment too :p
[08:30] <Laney> ok, I've got a fix for ubiquity, just test building it and will upload
[08:30] <sil2100> \o/
[08:31] <jibel> and I've got a kernel panic
[08:32]  * sil2100 doesn't know how to do a 'hands down' emote
[08:32] <sil2100> Oh, I know
[08:32] <sil2100> This one fits:
[08:32] <sil2100>  /o\
[08:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spectre-meltdown-checker (focal-proposed/universe) [0.43-2 => 0.43-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spectre-meltdown-checker [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.43-3]
[08:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lintian (focal-proposed/main) [2.59.0 => 2.59.0ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[08:41] <rbalint> lintian fixes the autpkgtest on armhf ^
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.8 => 20.04.9] (core)
[08:44] <Laney> sil2100: ^- please do the review thing
[08:45] <rbalint> cpaelzer, re systemd vs chrony, there is 245.3 cooking in ppa:ci-train-ppa-service/3801 with a bigger ntp-related fix
[08:49] <sil2100> On it
[08:50] <rbalint> ubuntu-archive also please unblock kodi LP: #1868499
[08:51] <rbalint> sil2100, and uchardet :-)
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.9]
[08:57] <jibel> sil2100, Laney bug 1870067
[09:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spice-html5 (focal-proposed/universe) [0.1.7-4 => 0.2.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:01] <jibel> sil2100, could be a corrupted media again
[09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spice-html5 [source] (focal-proposed) [0.2.2-0ubuntu1]
[09:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: salt (focal-proposed/universe) [3000+dfsg1-3 => 3000+dfsg1-4] (no packageset) (sync)
[09:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted salt [sync] (focal-proposed) [3000+dfsg1-4]
[09:04] <sil2100> jibel: ok, give me a sign if you see the same issue on that other USB stick
[09:07] <sil2100> I'll unblock ubiquity and qt5-ukui-platformtheme in the meantime
[09:08] <sil2100> rbalint: will re-look when I have a moment!
[09:18] <Laney> We'll definitely be respinning everything with ubiquity on it, just to be clear
[09:21] <cpaelzer> rbalint: good to know, but it might be more subtle
[09:21] <cpaelzer> rbalint: all retries I have o far work
[09:22] <cpaelzer> s390x/ppc were fixed by retries (this was never flaky before)
[09:23] <cpaelzer> I'm still looking for a place that reproduces the remaining issue (on x86)
[09:26] <jamespage> morning
[09:27] <jamespage> please could python-openstacksdk 0.45.0-0ubuntu2 be accepted into focal - it resolves the current FTBFS for this package and unblocks a dep-wait for senlin in universe
[09:38] <sil2100> Does anyone have a few cycles to check LP: #1869928, possibly on real hardware?
[09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: subdownloader (focal-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-2 => 2.1.0-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted subdownloader [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.1.0-3]
[10:03] <jamespage> also I need a release team ack to push nova-spiceproxy to the supported-misc-servers seed to support MIR bug 1108935
[10:03] <jamespage> please :)
[10:05] <sil2100> Oh noes, was able to reproduce LP: #1869928 on kvm
[10:05] <sil2100> Eickmeyer: ^
[10:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-magcode-core (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5.4-1 => 1.5.4-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-magcode-core [source] (focal-proposed) [1.5.4-1ubuntu1]
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-magcode-core (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5.4-1ubuntu1 => 1.5.4-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[10:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-magcode-core [source] (focal-proposed) [1.5.4-1ubuntu2]
[10:24] <sil2100> We're looking into that bug, as it might have been our changes that caused the regression
[10:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rapidjson (focal-proposed/universe) [1.1.0+dfsg2-5 => 1.1.0+dfsg2-5ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[10:29] <Laney> I've looked into the ubuntustudio failure
[10:29] <Laney> We think it was caused by the recent debian-cd changes
[10:29] <Laney> and have a proposed fix, going to try it now
[10:29] <Laney> juliank: ^- fyi ;-)
[10:30] <juliank> ok
[10:30] <Laney> hardcoding generic at line 159 was wrong for studio
[10:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: reptyr (focal-proposed/universe) [0.6.2-1.2 => 0.6.2-1.2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted reptyr [source] (focal-proposed) [0.6.2-1.2ubuntu1]
[10:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sabnzbdplus (focal-proposed/multiverse) [2.3.6+dfsg-1build1 => 2.3.6+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: seqan (focal-proposed/universe) [1.4.2+dfsg-3 => 1.4.2+dfsg-4] (no packageset) (sync)
[10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sabnzbdplus [source] (focal-proposed) [2.3.6+dfsg-1ubuntu1]
[10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted seqan [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.4.2+dfsg-4]
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401)
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: signing-party (focal-proposed/universe) [2.10-2 => 2.10-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:43] <juliank> Laney: oh, do they use lowlatency?
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted signing-party [source] (focal-proposed) [2.10-2ubuntu1]
[10:44] <sil2100> juliank: yes, the only flavour IIRC
[10:44] <Laney> yus
[10:45]  * sil2100 waits for his mirror to get updated
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sugar-toolkit-gtk3 (focal-proposed/universe) [0.116-5 => 0.116-5ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sugar-toolkit-gtk3 [source] (focal-proposed) [0.116-5ubuntu1]
[10:53] <Laney> sil2100: can haz images
[10:55] <sil2100> Iz working?
[10:55] <jibel> sil2100, everything looks fine on build 20200331 for Ubuntu. I'll redo a round of tests when we get the new image.
[10:57] <Laney> sure is!
[10:59] <sil2100> Sweet! Confirmed here as well
[10:59] <sil2100> Eickmeyer: ^ ubuntustudio should now have a booting iso again
[11:03] <jbicha> locutus__: did you see https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/03/31/%23ubuntu-release.html#t20:08 ?
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sugar-toolkit-gtk3 [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.116-5ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjade (focal-proposed/universe) [1.4devel1-21.3build1 => 1.4devel1-21.3ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-budgie, ubuntukylin)
[11:09] <cpaelzer> I asked this morning already, but let me re-ask now with more people being around
[11:09] <cpaelzer> ubuntu-archive - pgl-ddl-deploy is in focal-new and would be the last remainder of the postgresql-11 removal in bug 1862601 to come back being postgresql-12 compatible now
[11:10] <cpaelzer> it is a leaf package and not seeded anywhere
[11:10] <cpaelzer> from an upgrader POV not having it in Focal is more of a "feature change" than getting this new version in
[11:10] <cpaelzer> therefore I wanted to ask if you agree and would accept this into focal?
[11:10] <tjaalton> could someone ack xf86-input-wacom from the bionic queue, it's been there for three weeks
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: syslog-summary (focal-proposed/universe) [1.14-2.1build1 => 1.14-2.1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted syslog-summary [source] (focal-proposed) [1.14-2.1ubuntu1]
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: teeworlds (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-5build1 => 0.7.2-5ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted teeworlds [source] (focal-proposed) [0.7.2-5ubuntu1]
[11:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: telepathy-glib (focal-proposed/universe) [0.24.1-2 => 0.24.1-2ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: telepathy-idle (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-2build1 => 0.2.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted telepathy-idle [source] (focal-proposed) [0.2.0-2ubuntu1]
[11:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: telepathy-rakia (focal-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-3build1 => 0.8.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted telepathy-rakia [source] (focal-proposed) [0.8.0-3ubuntu1]
[11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: timew (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1build1 => 1.2.0-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted timew [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.2.0-2]
[11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: telepathy-ring (focal-proposed/universe) [2.3.24-1 => 2.3.24-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:35] <sil2100> Ok, so while we're waiting for ubiquity to migrate, we still have LP: #1865027 as a blocker, but it's being worked on right now
[11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted telepathy-ring [source] (focal-proposed) [2.3.24-1ubuntu1]
[11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: traitlets (focal-proposed/universe) [4.3.3-2 => 4.3.3-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted traitlets [source] (focal-proposed) [4.3.3-2ubuntu1]
[11:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: uftrace (focal-proposed/universe) [0.9.3-1 => 0.9.3-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wims-help (focal-proposed/universe) [4.01-3 => 4.01-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted uftrace [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.3-1ubuntu1]
[11:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wims-help [source] (focal-proposed) [4.01-3ubuntu1]
[11:52] <locutus__> jbicha, ack thanks
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: x86info (focal-proposed/universe) [1.31~pre0.8052aabdd159bc9050e7dc264f33782c5acce05f-1build1 => 1.31~pre0.8052aabdd159bc9050e7dc264f33782c5acce05f-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted x86info [source] (focal-proposed) [1.31~pre0.8052aabdd159bc9050e7dc264f33782c5acce05f-1ubuntu1]
[12:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yasm (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-2build1 => 1.3.0-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[12:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (focal-proposed/main) [2.13.3-7ubuntu2 => 2.13.3-7ubuntu3] (core, i386-whitelist)
[12:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zsnapd (focal-proposed/universe) [0.8.10b-1 => 0.8.11h-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zsnapd [source] (focal-proposed) [0.8.11h-1ubuntu1]
[12:06] <Laney> OK, now that ubiquity 20.04.9 is in focal, I'm going to respin all of the flavours that have it on
[12:06] <Laney> stand by
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zziplib (focal-proposed/universe) [0.13.62-3.2 => 0.13.62-3.2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[12:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgl-ddl-deploy [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.7.0-1]
[12:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sugar-toolkit-gtk3 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.116-5ubuntu1]
[12:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-grape-logging [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.8.3-1]
[12:23] <bdmurray> sil2100: How often does the "ISO Testing Notification" job run? I just got an email about the 20200331 image which seems late.
[12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgl-ddl-deploy [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1] (no packageset)
[12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgl-ddl-deploy [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1] (no packageset)
[12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgl-ddl-deploy [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1] (no packageset)
[12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgl-ddl-deploy [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1] (no packageset)
[12:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgl-ddl-deploy [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1] (no packageset)
[12:38] <sil2100> bdmurray: hm, I need to check, I think not too frequently, I think this was set up more for dailies
[12:38] <sil2100> Laney: \o/
[12:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bubblewrap (focal-proposed/main) [0.4.0-1ubuntu3 => 0.4.0-1ubuntu4] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntugnome)
[12:51] <tjaalton> bdmurray: hi, could you check xf86-input-wacom bionic sru again to see if my explanation is enough?
[13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgl-ddl-deploy [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.7.0-1]
[13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgl-ddl-deploy [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.7.0-1]
[13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgl-ddl-deploy [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.7.0-1]
[13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgl-ddl-deploy [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.7.0-1]
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgl-ddl-deploy [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.7.0-1]
[13:06] <bdmurray> sil2100: Could you help with a 2nd opinion on bug 1774242?
[13:06] <sil2100> bdmurray: looking
[13:06] <bdmurray> Thanks!
[13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401)
[13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401)
[13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server ppc64el [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401)
[13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server s390x [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401)
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401)
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401)
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401.1)
[13:27] <bdmurray> tjaalton: What behavior difference will Cinnamon users have if this change lands?
[13:27] <bdmurray> The description just says "feature regression" which isn't very specific.
[13:29] <tjaalton> that was based on upstream assumptions
[13:30] <sil2100> Since I was wondering how much worse will it be for users
[13:30] <tjaalton> it's been in focal from the start
[13:30] <sil2100> Like, will touch completely stop working for them?
[13:31] <sil2100> Yeah, but if there's a feature regression possible for existing users in bionic, I'd like to understand a bit better what upstream meant by that
[13:31] <tjaalton> most touchscreens use libinput
[13:31] <tjaalton> I'd say
[13:32] <tjaalton> https://github.com/linuxmint/cinnamon/issues/5497
[13:32] <gitbot> linuxmint issue 5497 in cinnamon "Touch Screen support." [Feature Request, Closed]
[13:32] <tjaalton> that says 'install touchegg'
[13:34] <tjaalton> and no, it wouldn't completely stop working, just no gestures where they were previously provided by wacom
[13:35] <bdmurray> Does that mean a subset of gestures would be available?
[13:35] <tjaalton> depends on the desktop. gnome handles them natively, for instance
[13:35] <tjaalton> cinnamon itself doesn't provide any
[13:43] <bdmurray> sil2100: What do you think? Maybe accept but let it age for quite a while?
[13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-1017.18]
[13:50] <sil2100> bdmurray: I guess this might be an option - maybe we could also ask flavors for help? They could give the -proposed packages a spin and assess on how big of an impact does it actually have on their users
[13:51] <bdmurray> sil2100: Do you think we should reach out to the flavors or tjaalton?
[13:53] <sil2100> bdmurray: it makes most sense for it to be the uploader's responsibility
[13:53] <tjaalton> I can ask binli to test cinnamon on bionic. it's what Mint has aiui, so they have some users
[13:53] <sil2100> Guess an e-mail to ubuntu-flavors@ could be enough?
[13:54] <tjaalton> or that
[13:54] <bdmurray> or both!
[13:54] <tjaalton> :)
[13:54] <sil2100> Both would be lovely!
[13:54] <sil2100> ;)
[13:54] <sil2100> tjaalton: thanks o/
[14:00]  * RikMills glares at kubuntu iso build
[14:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401)
[14:04] <sil2100> Things are still slow, Laney is discussing with IS what could be the real deal here
[14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xf86-input-wacom [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:0.36.1-0ubuntu1.1]
[14:05] <bdmurray> "the real deal"
[14:06] <Laney> ah yes
[14:06] <Laney> let's update...
[14:07] <Laney> The builds will finish eventually but we would like performance to be more like normal if possible
[14:11] <tjaalton> sil2100, bdmurray: ty :)
[14:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401)
[14:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401)
[14:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401)
[14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: telepathy-glib (focal-proposed/universe) [0.24.1-2 => 0.24.1-2ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[14:26] <sil2100> RikMills: kubuntu done! This time I think you should be able to get further in the installation process ;p
[14:27] <RikMills> sil2100: I did a very quick test on that last iso in the VM, updating ubiquity, and it succeeded
[14:29] <RikMills> taking ages to sync to cdimage, but that happens
[14:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: aptdaemon (focal-proposed/main) [1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu31 => 1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu32] (desktop-core)
[14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sassc (focal-proposed/universe) [3.5.0-1 => 3.6.1-2] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[14:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt-clone (focal-proposed/main) [0.4.1ubuntu2 => 0.4.1ubuntu3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[14:54] <locutus_> can any AA please do some NBS-proposed cleanup? missing build on amd64: rabbitvcs-thunar
[14:55] <locutus_> it is in proposed, but not sure why itsn't automatically cleaned it up because there is no rabbitvcs in release pocket
[14:55] <locutus_> jbicha, ^^
[15:03] <jibel> Laney, can you have a look at bug 1870147
[15:03] <jibel> ?
[15:06] <sil2100> This bug is not very descriptive
[15:07] <sil2100> jibel: when is this crash happening? How can we reproduce?
[15:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt-clone (focal-proposed/main) [0.4.1ubuntu2 => 0.4.1ubuntu3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[15:07] <bdmurray> But is it destructive?
[15:08] <jibel> sil2100, I asked the OP more info.
[15:09] <vorlon> locutus_: NBS-proposed never gets cleaned up automatically
[15:10] <vorlon> locutus_: done
[15:12] <vorlon> locutus_: I think you missed my comment yesterday about libsass due to disconnect.  If libsass's test-depends switched to depending on ruby:any, and libsass itself changed its test dependency to ruby:native, I believe this should work; however I can't test locally because sass-spec-data contains non-normalized utf8 directory names, which causes dpkg to fail to unpack it on a ZFS filesystem. :P
[15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager-fortisslvpn (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.8-2 => 1.2.10-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted network-manager-fortisslvpn [source] (focal-proposed) [1.2.10-0ubuntu1]
[15:31] <Laney> Release noting bug #1870018
[15:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: swig3.0 (focal-proposed/primary) [3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1]
[15:36] <rbalint> vorlon, could you please clean up LP: #1868499 , too?
[15:40] <vorlon> rbalint: yes, looking at it now
[15:41] <vorlon> rbalint: there are reverse-build-depends on kodi that build on s390x (kodi-addons-dev).  Can you analyze these and feed me a list of what needs removed from other sources, confirming that they also have no revdeps?
[15:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nodejs (focal-proposed/universe) [10.17.0~dfsg-2ubuntu6 => 10.19.0~dfsg-3ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[15:42] <rbalint> vorlon, i've listed them all in the bug
[15:43] <vorlon> rbalint: kodi-pvr-argustv has xbmc-pvr-argustv as a revdep and is built on s390x
[15:43] <vorlon> so you haven't recursed the revdeps
[15:45] <rbalint> vorlon, hm, i did recurse, but missed those xbmc ones
[15:45] <rbalint> vorlon, thanks, i'll update the list
[15:46] <xnox> now that we have blacklists/whitelists in launchpad, maybe we can make s390x to be a partial port too?
[15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: capnproto (focal-proposed/main) [0.7.0-5build1 => 0.7.0-6] (ubuntu-desktop)
[15:50] <vorlon> xnox: I don't believe it would be less overhead than the current approach
[15:50] <vorlon> xnox: we basically only remove stuff once it ftbfs and impacts its revdeps, putting those into a blacklist in addition to removing the binaries would be more overhead
[15:53] <sil2100> mwhudson: hey! Once you're around (not sure if you got pinged about this already), could you take a look at LP: #1865027 ? We suspect it might be something wrong with probert, at least that's how it looks like
[15:55] <sil2100> Status update regarding beta: we are still waiting for all rebuilds to finish uploading, we still have one subiquity-related blocker on our radar (details above ^), but most likely this will not require respinning the whole world
[15:55] <sil2100> So please proceed with testing of those images that rebuilt already
[15:55] <sil2100> (I think we still waiting for desktop)
[15:55] <bdmurray> I'm testing RPi arm64!
[15:56] <sil2100> \o/
[16:28] <plars> same
[16:28] <plars> and armhf of course
[16:30] <plars> bdmurray: which device(s)?
[16:30] <bdmurray> plars: oh, that's right Pi4 right now
[16:31] <plars> bdmurray: I've 1/2GB pi4 on armhf/arm64, moving on to 4GB next. I have automated results for *almost* everything else, but I want to at check sanity with everything on local devices too
[16:32] <plars> cm3-arm64 is giving me grief for automated tests we run though, because all the dependencies fills up the tiny 4GB emmc on the device :/
[16:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yasm (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-2build1 => 1.3.0-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[17:01] <locutus_> vorlon, I got reminded already by j_bicha and I did upload them in my ppa already https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+packages
[17:01] <locutus_> this is the trigger I'm testing right now https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=focal&arch=i386&package=libsass&ppa=costamagnagianfranco/locutusofborg-ppa&trigger=sass-spec/3.5.4-2ubuntu1&trigger=libsass/3.6.3-1ubuntu1&trigger=sassc/3.6.1-2&trigger=ruby-sass/3.7.4-1ubuntu1&all-proposed=1
[17:01] <vorlon> locutus_: ok
[17:05] <locutus_> vorlon, https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal-costamagnagianfranco-locutusofborg-ppa/focal/i386/libs/libsass/20200401_170419_456fb@/log.gz
[17:05] <locutus_> I can't make it work
[17:05] <locutus_> patced sass-spec, ruby-sass, libsass, and no improvement
[17:08] <vorlon> locutus_: since sass-spec and sass-spec-data are Architecture: all, they also need to either be marked Multi-Arch: foreign, or the test deps need to be annotated :native
[17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openwsman (focal-proposed/universe) [2.6.5-0ubuntu4 => 2.6.5-0ubuntu5] (no packageset)
[17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openwsman [source] (focal-proposed) [2.6.5-0ubuntu5]
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hp-ppd (focal-proposed/universe) [0.9ubuntu2+really-0.2ubuntu1 => 0.9ubuntu2+really-0.2ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hp-ppd [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9ubuntu2+really-0.2ubuntu2]
[17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: telepathy-glib (focal-proposed/universe) [0.24.1-2 => 0.24.1-2ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdeconnect (focal-proposed/universe) [1.4-0ubuntu3 => 1.4-0ubuntu4] (kubuntu)
[17:58] <RikMills> ^ not needed for the beta
[17:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: folder-color (focal-proposed/universe) [0.0.86-0ubuntu2 => 0.0.86-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-mate)
[17:58] <bdmurray> RikMills: Is there anything you can add to the Beta Release notes about Kubuntu?
[18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sundials (focal-proposed/universe) [3.1.2+dfsg-3build5 => 3.1.2+dfsg-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:03] <RikMills> bdmurray: yes, there will be. where are the ubuntu ones?
[18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sundials [source] (focal-proposed) [3.1.2+dfsg-3ubuntu1]
[18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected telepathy-glib [source] (focal-proposed) [0.24.1-2ubuntu1]
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected folder-color [source] (focal-proposed) [0.0.86-0ubuntu3]
[18:17] <RikMills> bdmurray: bare bones are now @ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FocalFossa/Beta/Kubuntu
[18:17] <RikMills> will polish that up by release time
[18:18] <bdmurray> thanks
[18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected apt-clone [source] (focal-proposed) [0.4.1ubuntu3]
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sass-spec (focal-proposed/universe) [3.5.4-2 => 3.5.4-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sass-spec [source] (focal-proposed) [3.5.4-2ubuntu1]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-sass (focal-proposed/universe) [3.7.4-1 => 3.7.4-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-sass [source] (focal-proposed) [3.7.4-1ubuntu1]
[18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libsass (focal-proposed/universe) [3.6.3-1 => 3.6.3-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[18:27] <mwhudson> sil2100: yeah
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected yasm [source] (focal-proposed) [1.3.0-2ubuntu1]
[19:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-snapshot (focal-proposed/universe) [1:20200124-1ubuntu1 => 1:20200401-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[19:07] <locutus_> ubuntu-archive please accept libsass? I fixed the multiarch i386 autopkgtest sadness
[19:10] <sil2100> mwhudson: thank you!
[19:10] <sil2100> :)
[19:12] <sil2100> wow, desktop arm64 still didn't get uploaded
[19:13] <sil2100> Actually, scratch that, I see the livefs build succeeded 19 minutes ago!
[19:13] <bdmurray> "Uploading build"
[19:17] <bdmurray> "Successfully built"!
[19:20] <sil2100> This is a new record!
[19:20] <sil2100> ;)
[19:20] <doko> is it intended that the packages in i386-whitelist land in the unapproved queue?
[19:20] <doko> sil2100: ^^^
[19:22] <doko> anyway, accepted gcc-snapshot
[19:22] <sil2100> doko: they shouldn't, but the bot needs to be updated - not sure if we had anyone actioned to do it yet
[19:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401)
[19:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401)
[19:22] <sil2100> I just remember L_aney talking about it
[19:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-snapshot [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20200401-1ubuntu1]
[19:23] <doko> ok, then I'll accept those
[19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libsass [source] (focal-proposed) [3.6.3-1ubuntu1]
[19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yasm [source] (focal-proposed) [1.3.0-2ubuntu1]
[19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sassc [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.6.1-2]
[19:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pikepdf [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.10.3+dfsg-1]
[19:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wine-development [source] (focal-proposed) [5.5-1ubuntu1]
[19:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rapidjson [source] (focal-proposed) [1.1.0+dfsg2-5ubuntu1]
[19:26] <rafaeldtinoco> hello. I have 1 important and another one .. medium important FFe opened. would u like to highlight them here to see if they can be reviewed
[19:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cwiid [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.6.00+svn201-5]
[19:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lintian [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.61.0]
[19:26] <rafaeldtinoco> important one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/resource-agents/+bug/1866383
[19:26] <rafaeldtinoco> semi-important one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kronosnet/+bug/1866385
[19:29] <bdmurray> Okay, now Ubuntu Desktop amd64 rebuild is available. Get testing!
[19:31] <juliank> doko: fyi, i did upload the apt-clone and aptdaemon ftbfs fixes earlier today. I'm not super sure about aptdaemon because it's test suite runs too long and I cancelled it, but it at least built :)
[19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (focal-proposed/main) [156 => 157] (ubuntu-desktop)
[20:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fence-agents [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.25-2ubuntu1.1]
[20:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pacemaker [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.18-0ubuntu1.2]
[20:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd-signed (focal-proposed/main) [1.26 => 1.27] (core)
[20:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: phpmyadmin (focal-proposed/universe) [4:4.9.5+dfsg1-1ubuntu1 => 4:4.9.5+dfsg1-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted phpmyadmin [sync] (focal-proposed) [4:4.9.5+dfsg1-2]
[20:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wine-development (focal-proposed/universe) [5.5-1ubuntu1 => 5.5-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[20:28] <locutus_> please don't accept wine until the current one migrates :)
[20:32] <mclemenceau> cd
[20:32] <locutus_> ~
[20:47] <rbalint> vorlon, i've updated the kodi s390x removal bug
[20:49] <Eickmeyer> sil2100: Can you spare a cycle to look at https://launchpad.net/bubblemail? It would be an entirely NEW package that works in the spirit of mailnag.
[20:49] <Eickmeyer> teward and I have been working on this one.
[20:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tor (focal-proposed/universe) [0.4.2.6-1 => 0.4.2.7-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:51] <Eickmeyer> Not intended for any seed.
[20:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tor [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.4.2.7-1]
[20:54] <Eickmeyer> No rdeps.
[21:09] <Laney> bdmurray: thanks for following up with IS
[21:10] <bdmurray> Laney: no problem
[21:10] <vorlon> rbalint: somehow I still don't see any xbmc on there?
[21:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: picard (focal-proposed/universe) [2.3-1 => 2.3.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[21:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted picard [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.3.1-1]
[21:23] <seb128> fossfreedom, hey, I've sponsored you slideshow fix but you should probably ask to r-t people here if you want it to be considered, especially that you didn't attach any bug report or anything that would help with judging the importance of the fix
[21:30] <vorlon> rbalint: ah I see you have a separate bug for xbmc
[21:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: murano-agent (focal-proposed/universe) [1:5.0.0~b1~git2019121815.2b2cc45-0ubuntu4 => 1:5.0.0~b1~git2019121815.2b2cc45-0ubuntu5] (no packageset)
[21:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted murano-agent [source] (focal-proposed) [1:5.0.0~b1~git2019121815.2b2cc45-0ubuntu5]
[21:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (focal-proposed/universe) [3.0.4-0ubuntu3 => 4.0.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[21:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lxc [source] (focal-proposed) [4.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[21:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: bubblemail (focal-proposed/primary) [0.5-0ubuntu1]
[21:58] <Wimpress> vorlon: Is it expected that nvidia drivers are build DKMS modules in 20.04?
[22:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (focal-proposed/universe) [3.0.4-0ubuntu3 => 1:4.0.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxc [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[22:06] <vorlon> Wimpress: >_<
[22:07] <Wimpress> I ask, because that is what happened during updates today. Which caused a kernel panic.
[22:07] <vorlon> Wimpress: the kernel pieces have landed such that ubuntu-drivers should not /need/ to pull in nvidia-dkms-$ver.  However I don't know if ubuntu-drivers does the correct thing yet
[22:07] <Wimpress> Current status:
[22:07] <Wimpress> https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/tpThF7NA/IMG_20200401_230526.jpg
[22:07] <vorlon> "during updates" so this was an already installed system, not a fresh install?
[22:07] <Wimpress> Yes, already install 20.04.
[22:08] <Wimpress> Has been on 20.04 for months.
[22:08] <Wimpress> Applying daily updates.
[22:08] <vorlon> Wimpress: a kernel panic is a strange outcome of compiling kernel modules.
[22:08] <Wimpress> I agree 🙂
[22:09] <vorlon> Wimpress: but also if this wasn't a fresh install, you might well have installed at a time when nvidia-dkms was the only option
[22:09] <vorlon> after you recover you could check what happens if you apt purge nvidia-dkms-440
[22:09] <Wimpress> System load is 16
[22:09] <Wimpress> While attempting to build DKMS modules which are in a segfault loop.
[22:09] <vorlon> cute
[22:09] <vorlon> well kill all of that with fire
[22:10] <Wimpress> Yes. I'll do the 440 purge and gather info.
[22:10] <Wimpress> So, try and remove DKMS now?
[22:15] <teward> ubuntu-archive: No rush but if you get bored or have ten minutes to review bubblemail that'd be great.  There's an in-the-works process in Debian to get it into Debian so until then we're using -0ubuntuX notations on the bubblemail packages.  (Eickmeyer would like this to be available for focal, himself, and it's not going to be seeded anywhere.)
[22:15] <teward> but *no rush*
[22:15] <teward> *lurks*
[22:18] <Eickmeyer> There is a corresponding gnome shell extension that the upstream would like packaged at some point, but that can wait.
[22:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireguard-linux-compat (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.20200330-1ubuntu1 => 1.0.20200401-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireguard-linux-compat [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.20200401-1ubuntu1]
[22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cgit (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.1+git2.18.0-1 => 1.2.3+git2.25.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: telegram-desktop (focal-proposed/universe) [1.9.21+ds-1 => 2.0.1+ds-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted telegram-desktop [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.0.1+ds-1]
[22:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cgit [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.2.3+git2.25.1-1]
[23:01] <Wimpress> vorlon: attempting to remove nvidia-dkms-440 want to remove the entirety of the nvidia drivers.
[23:11] <Wimpress> Running 'ubuntu-drivers autoinstall' is pulling in nvidia-dkms-440'
[23:39] <Wimpress> The 390, 435 and 440 drivers all segfault while attempting to build DKMS modules. Net result, currently impossible to install nvidia drivers.
[23:40] <Wimpress> I've captured some logs and crash reports
[23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: stress-ng (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.05-1 => 0.11.07-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted stress-ng [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.11.07-1]