[00:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200331) [00:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200331) [00:29] The problem seems to be network saturation in the clouds, but it's a bit weird. [01:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-46.38~18.04.1] [01:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-46.38~18.04.1] [01:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-46.38~18.04.1] [01:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1014.15~18.04.1] (no packageset) [02:08] what's the contents of these .list files? eg http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/bionic/daily-live/current/bionic-desktop-amd64.list -- there's only 44 lines with 'pool' in them, I expected far more than that many packages installed.. [02:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: logaricheck (focal-proposed/universe) [0.6.1-0ubuntu3 => 0.6.1-0ubuntu4] (no packageset) [02:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted logaricheck [source] (focal-proposed) [0.6.1-0ubuntu4] [03:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxd-agent-loader (focal-proposed/main) [0.3 => 0.4] (no packageset) [03:11] sarnold: that's the files on the iso, mostly [03:11] sarnold: the /pool/ is the package pool for things that can be installed by the installer (some dkms garbage usually) [03:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (focal-proposed/main) [1.446 => 1.447] (core) [03:12] ^ the previous ubuntu-meta had the changelog entry generate for lxd-agent-loader but was missing the actual change somehow (not sure what happened with the update script), this one looks actually correct. Only affects server/cloud, I don't have an opinion on whether this should still make it for beta or be let in afterwards. [03:13] mwhudson: that's the funny thing though, half the packages there don't look useful, at least not to me :), and it's about 400 fewer than I expected.. [03:13] sarnold: the installer mostly does cp -a out of a squashfs [03:14] mwhudson: are these /pool/ files then packages that had to be replaced after the squash was squished? [03:14] sarnold: no [03:14] they are extra stuff that the installer can choose to install [03:14] the random stuff is mostly from dkms being there [03:14] some are less random, e.g. grub-efi :) [03:15] that one makes sense :) [03:15] fakeroot though, libasan.. [03:16] sarnold: gory details https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu.focal/ship-live [03:17] oh I'm sucker for ascii tables [03:17] oh that's focal of course [03:17] thanks mwhudson ;) [03:18] https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu.bionic/ship-live <- bit smaller [03:18] sarnold: these are the packages that are specified https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu.bionic/ship-live.seed [03:19] interesting how that grows to include libasan :) [05:22] sil2100: Laney: I'll look for the chrony tests now (was EOD yesterday already when it came up) [05:26] we had fixes for "the new systemd" when the new one was 244, maybe we need soemthing for 245 now [05:26] I'll let you know in a bit [05:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1014.15~18.04.1] [05:53] ubuntu-archive: I've a question about dragonfly-reverb in the focal NEW queue. I've reviewed it, and it seems okaaaaaay, other than that it embeds a xxd'd copy of NotoSans in a source file, and it's not clear to me that this is kosher in a GPL-licensed binary. Has this been seen before? [06:26] Laney, can you have a look at bug 1869992? I think it's caused by the changes for oem enablement [06:26] bug 1869992 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Ubiquity crashes during Kubuntu install on WIFI menu" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1869992 [06:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: pgl-ddl-deploy (focal-proposed/primary) [1.7.0-1] [06:51] Hi, release team, could I upload qt5-ukui-platformtheme 1.0.2-0ubuntu1 which fix a crash bug found in today's daily test? Sorry for the inconvenience. [06:55] handsome_feng, hey, you can always upload, you don't need approval for that. You might ask for things to get reviewed/approved for beta once upload though [06:56] seb128: Got it, Thanks! [06:56] np! [06:59] Then, could someone help to upload it for me since the request for add it to packageset don't get response yet, :) PPA: https://launchpad.net/~feng-kylin/+archive/ubuntu/ukui-debian [07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qt5-ukui-platformtheme (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.0.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [07:28] handsome_feng: ^ [07:29] RikMills: \o/ [07:30] hiho ubuntu-archive - pgl-ddl-deploy is in focal-new and would be the last remainder of the postgresql-11 removal in bug 1862601 to come back being postgresql-12 compatible now [07:31] bug 1862601 in postgresql-11 (Ubuntu) "[Remove] Please remove postgresql-11 from Focal" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1862601 [07:31] it is a leaf package and not seeded anywhere [07:31] from an upgrader POV not having it in Focal is more of a "feature change" than getting this new version in [07:31] therefore I wanted to ask if you agree and would accept this into focal? [07:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gssproxy (focal-proposed/universe) [0.8.2-1 => 0.8.2-2] (no packageset) (sync) [07:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gssproxy [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.8.2-2] [08:01] I can look at it after the beta [08:04] jibel: definitely! [08:05] you probably don't need to assign me bugs in multiple places though [08:06] I guess LP: #1869983 should be a dupe, even though no in the actual oem install? [08:06] Launchpad bug 1869983 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Kubuntu 20.04 ubiquity installer crash" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1869983 === Laney changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: Bionic 18.04.4, Eoan 19.10 | Beta Communicator: Laney | Archive: Beta Freeze | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Focal Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or gin | melius malum quod cognoscis [08:07] sil2100: Hi, Is it possible to accept qt5-ukui-platformtheme 1.0.2 into beta? [08:07] handsome_feng: ok! [08:07] Thanks! [08:08] handsome_feng: there is a possibility that we *might* be respinning, so I guess it could still get into the next batch - but we'll see [08:08] sil2100: Fine, :) [08:09] hello, can any AA please change force-badtest libsass/3.5.5-4/i386 into a versionless hint? [08:09] sil2100: I guess you wouldn't allow a whole Plasma point release into the beta, LOL [08:11] RikMills: I think *that* is a bit too much ;) [08:11] figure so :) [08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qt5-ukui-platformtheme [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1] [08:11] bad upstream timing on that release. sigh... [08:14] Laney, yeah I added it to the gdoc for good measure but that's just duplicating what lp already knows [08:14] nod [08:16] It's a good idea to list the bugs there but maybe not the assignment too :p [08:30] ok, I've got a fix for ubiquity, just test building it and will upload [08:30] \o/ [08:31] and I've got a kernel panic [08:32] * sil2100 doesn't know how to do a 'hands down' emote [08:32] Oh, I know [08:32] This one fits: [08:32] /o\ [08:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spectre-meltdown-checker (focal-proposed/universe) [0.43-2 => 0.43-3] (no packageset) (sync) [08:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spectre-meltdown-checker [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.43-3] [08:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lintian (focal-proposed/main) [2.59.0 => 2.59.0ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [08:41] lintian fixes the autpkgtest on armhf ^ [08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.8 => 20.04.9] (core) [08:44] sil2100: ^- please do the review thing [08:45] cpaelzer, re systemd vs chrony, there is 245.3 cooking in ppa:ci-train-ppa-service/3801 with a bigger ntp-related fix [08:49] On it [08:50] ubuntu-archive also please unblock kodi LP: #1868499 [08:50] Launchpad bug 1868499 in kodi (Ubuntu) " Please remove s390x binaries for 2:18.5+dfsg1-0ubuntu3 with all reverse dependencies" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1868499 [08:51] sil2100, and uchardet :-) [08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.9] [08:57] sil2100, Laney bug 1870067 [08:57] bug 1870067 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "ubiquity crashed with TypeError in enable_download_updates(): Argument 1 does not allow None as a value" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1870067 [09:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spice-html5 (focal-proposed/universe) [0.1.7-4 => 0.2.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [09:01] sil2100, could be a corrupted media again [09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spice-html5 [source] (focal-proposed) [0.2.2-0ubuntu1] [09:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: salt (focal-proposed/universe) [3000+dfsg1-3 => 3000+dfsg1-4] (no packageset) (sync) [09:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted salt [sync] (focal-proposed) [3000+dfsg1-4] [09:04] jibel: ok, give me a sign if you see the same issue on that other USB stick [09:07] I'll unblock ubiquity and qt5-ukui-platformtheme in the meantime [09:08] rbalint: will re-look when I have a moment! [09:18] We'll definitely be respinning everything with ubiquity on it, just to be clear [09:21] rbalint: good to know, but it might be more subtle [09:21] rbalint: all retries I have o far work [09:22] s390x/ppc were fixed by retries (this was never flaky before) [09:23] I'm still looking for a place that reproduces the remaining issue (on x86) [09:26] morning [09:27] please could python-openstacksdk 0.45.0-0ubuntu2 be accepted into focal - it resolves the current FTBFS for this package and unblocks a dep-wait for senlin in universe [09:38] Does anyone have a few cycles to check LP: #1869928, possibly on real hardware? [09:38] Launchpad bug 1869928 in Ubuntu Studio "Ubuntu Studio 20.04 ISO Boot Issue" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1869928 [09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: subdownloader (focal-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-2 => 2.1.0-3] (no packageset) (sync) [09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted subdownloader [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.1.0-3] [10:03] also I need a release team ack to push nova-spiceproxy to the supported-misc-servers seed to support MIR bug 1108935 [10:03] bug 1108935 in spice-html5 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] websockify, spice-html5" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1108935 [10:03] please :) [10:05] Oh noes, was able to reproduce LP: #1869928 on kvm [10:05] Launchpad bug 1869928 in Ubuntu Studio "Ubuntu Studio 20.04 ISO Boot Issue" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1869928 [10:05] Eickmeyer: ^ [10:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-magcode-core (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5.4-1 => 1.5.4-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-magcode-core [source] (focal-proposed) [1.5.4-1ubuntu1] [10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-magcode-core (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5.4-1ubuntu1 => 1.5.4-1ubuntu2] (no packageset) [10:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-magcode-core [source] (focal-proposed) [1.5.4-1ubuntu2] [10:24] We're looking into that bug, as it might have been our changes that caused the regression [10:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rapidjson (focal-proposed/universe) [1.1.0+dfsg2-5 => 1.1.0+dfsg2-5ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) [10:29] I've looked into the ubuntustudio failure [10:29] We think it was caused by the recent debian-cd changes [10:29] and have a proposed fix, going to try it now [10:29] juliank: ^- fyi ;-) [10:30] ok [10:30] hardcoding generic at line 159 was wrong for studio [10:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: reptyr (focal-proposed/universe) [0.6.2-1.2 => 0.6.2-1.2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted reptyr [source] (focal-proposed) [0.6.2-1.2ubuntu1] [10:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sabnzbdplus (focal-proposed/multiverse) [2.3.6+dfsg-1build1 => 2.3.6+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: seqan (focal-proposed/universe) [1.4.2+dfsg-3 => 1.4.2+dfsg-4] (no packageset) (sync) [10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sabnzbdplus [source] (focal-proposed) [2.3.6+dfsg-1ubuntu1] [10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted seqan [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.4.2+dfsg-4] [10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401) [10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: signing-party (focal-proposed/universe) [2.10-2 => 2.10-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:43] Laney: oh, do they use lowlatency? [10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted signing-party [source] (focal-proposed) [2.10-2ubuntu1] [10:44] juliank: yes, the only flavour IIRC [10:44] yus [10:45] * sil2100 waits for his mirror to get updated [10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sugar-toolkit-gtk3 (focal-proposed/universe) [0.116-5 => 0.116-5ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sugar-toolkit-gtk3 [source] (focal-proposed) [0.116-5ubuntu1] [10:53] sil2100: can haz images [10:55] Iz working? [10:55] sil2100, everything looks fine on build 20200331 for Ubuntu. I'll redo a round of tests when we get the new image. [10:57] sure is! [10:59] Sweet! Confirmed here as well [10:59] Eickmeyer: ^ ubuntustudio should now have a booting iso again [11:03] locutus__: did you see https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/03/31/%23ubuntu-release.html#t20:08 ? [11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sugar-toolkit-gtk3 [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.116-5ubuntu1] (no packageset) [11:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjade (focal-proposed/universe) [1.4devel1-21.3build1 => 1.4devel1-21.3ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-budgie, ubuntukylin) [11:09] I asked this morning already, but let me re-ask now with more people being around [11:09] ubuntu-archive - pgl-ddl-deploy is in focal-new and would be the last remainder of the postgresql-11 removal in bug 1862601 to come back being postgresql-12 compatible now [11:09] bug 1862601 in postgresql-11 (Ubuntu) "[Remove] Please remove postgresql-11 from Focal" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1862601 [11:10] it is a leaf package and not seeded anywhere [11:10] from an upgrader POV not having it in Focal is more of a "feature change" than getting this new version in [11:10] therefore I wanted to ask if you agree and would accept this into focal? [11:10] could someone ack xf86-input-wacom from the bionic queue, it's been there for three weeks [11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: syslog-summary (focal-proposed/universe) [1.14-2.1build1 => 1.14-2.1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted syslog-summary [source] (focal-proposed) [1.14-2.1ubuntu1] [11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: teeworlds (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-5build1 => 0.7.2-5ubuntu1] (no packageset) [11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted teeworlds [source] (focal-proposed) [0.7.2-5ubuntu1] [11:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: telepathy-glib (focal-proposed/universe) [0.24.1-2 => 0.24.1-2ubuntu1] (kubuntu) [11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: telepathy-idle (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-2build1 => 0.2.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted telepathy-idle [source] (focal-proposed) [0.2.0-2ubuntu1] [11:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: telepathy-rakia (focal-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-3build1 => 0.8.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) [11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted telepathy-rakia [source] (focal-proposed) [0.8.0-3ubuntu1] [11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: timew (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1build1 => 1.2.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) [11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted timew [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.2.0-2] [11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: telepathy-ring (focal-proposed/universe) [2.3.24-1 => 2.3.24-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [11:35] Ok, so while we're waiting for ubiquity to migrate, we still have LP: #1865027 as a blocker, but it's being worked on right now [11:35] Launchpad bug 1865027 in subiquity "focal-arm64 install fails. No space left on device on /target" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1865027 [11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted telepathy-ring [source] (focal-proposed) [2.3.24-1ubuntu1] [11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: traitlets (focal-proposed/universe) [4.3.3-2 => 4.3.3-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted traitlets [source] (focal-proposed) [4.3.3-2ubuntu1] [11:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: uftrace (focal-proposed/universe) [0.9.3-1 => 0.9.3-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [11:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wims-help (focal-proposed/universe) [4.01-3 => 4.01-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) [11:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted uftrace [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.3-1ubuntu1] [11:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wims-help [source] (focal-proposed) [4.01-3ubuntu1] [11:52] jbicha, ack thanks [11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: x86info (focal-proposed/universe) [1.31~pre0.8052aabdd159bc9050e7dc264f33782c5acce05f-1build1 => 1.31~pre0.8052aabdd159bc9050e7dc264f33782c5acce05f-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted x86info [source] (focal-proposed) [1.31~pre0.8052aabdd159bc9050e7dc264f33782c5acce05f-1ubuntu1] [12:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yasm (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-2build1 => 1.3.0-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) [12:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (focal-proposed/main) [2.13.3-7ubuntu2 => 2.13.3-7ubuntu3] (core, i386-whitelist) [12:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zsnapd (focal-proposed/universe) [0.8.10b-1 => 0.8.11h-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zsnapd [source] (focal-proposed) [0.8.11h-1ubuntu1] [12:06] OK, now that ubiquity 20.04.9 is in focal, I'm going to respin all of the flavours that have it on [12:06] stand by [12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zziplib (focal-proposed/universe) [0.13.62-3.2 => 0.13.62-3.2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) [12:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgl-ddl-deploy [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.7.0-1] [12:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sugar-toolkit-gtk3 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.116-5ubuntu1] [12:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-grape-logging [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.8.3-1] [12:23] sil2100: How often does the "ISO Testing Notification" job run? I just got an email about the 20200331 image which seems late. [12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgl-ddl-deploy [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1] (no packageset) [12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgl-ddl-deploy [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1] (no packageset) [12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgl-ddl-deploy [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1] (no packageset) [12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgl-ddl-deploy [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1] (no packageset) [12:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgl-ddl-deploy [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1] (no packageset) [12:38] bdmurray: hm, I need to check, I think not too frequently, I think this was set up more for dailies [12:38] Laney: \o/ [12:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bubblewrap (focal-proposed/main) [0.4.0-1ubuntu3 => 0.4.0-1ubuntu4] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntugnome) [12:51] bdmurray: hi, could you check xf86-input-wacom bionic sru again to see if my explanation is enough? [13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgl-ddl-deploy [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.7.0-1] [13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgl-ddl-deploy [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.7.0-1] [13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgl-ddl-deploy [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.7.0-1] [13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgl-ddl-deploy [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.7.0-1] [13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgl-ddl-deploy [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.7.0-1] [13:06] sil2100: Could you help with a 2nd opinion on bug 1774242? [13:06] bug 1774242 in OEM Priority Project "Wacom touchscreens should disable gestures" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1774242 [13:06] bdmurray: looking [13:06] Thanks! [13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401) [13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401) [13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server ppc64el [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401) [13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server s390x [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401) [13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401) [13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401) [13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401.1) [13:27] tjaalton: What behavior difference will Cinnamon users have if this change lands? [13:27] The description just says "feature regression" which isn't very specific. [13:29] that was based on upstream assumptions [13:30] Since I was wondering how much worse will it be for users [13:30] it's been in focal from the start [13:30] Like, will touch completely stop working for them? [13:31] Yeah, but if there's a feature regression possible for existing users in bionic, I'd like to understand a bit better what upstream meant by that [13:31] most touchscreens use libinput [13:31] I'd say [13:32] https://github.com/linuxmint/cinnamon/issues/5497 [13:32] linuxmint issue 5497 in cinnamon "Touch Screen support." [Feature Request, Closed] [13:32] that says 'install touchegg' [13:34] and no, it wouldn't completely stop working, just no gestures where they were previously provided by wacom [13:35] Does that mean a subset of gestures would be available? [13:35] depends on the desktop. gnome handles them natively, for instance [13:35] cinnamon itself doesn't provide any [13:43] sil2100: What do you think? Maybe accept but let it age for quite a while? [13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-1017.18] [13:50] bdmurray: I guess this might be an option - maybe we could also ask flavors for help? They could give the -proposed packages a spin and assess on how big of an impact does it actually have on their users [13:51] sil2100: Do you think we should reach out to the flavors or tjaalton? [13:53] bdmurray: it makes most sense for it to be the uploader's responsibility [13:53] I can ask binli to test cinnamon on bionic. it's what Mint has aiui, so they have some users [13:53] Guess an e-mail to ubuntu-flavors@ could be enough? [13:54] or that [13:54] or both! [13:54] :) [13:54] Both would be lovely! [13:54] ;) [13:54] tjaalton: thanks o/ [14:00] * RikMills glares at kubuntu iso build [14:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401) [14:04] Things are still slow, Laney is discussing with IS what could be the real deal here [14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xf86-input-wacom [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:0.36.1-0ubuntu1.1] [14:05] "the real deal" [14:06] ah yes [14:06] let's update... === Laney changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: Bionic 18.04.4, Eoan 19.10 | Beta Communicator: sil2100 | Archive: Beta Freeze | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Focal Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or gin | melius malum quod cognoscis [14:07] The builds will finish eventually but we would like performance to be more like normal if possible [14:11] sil2100, bdmurray: ty :) [14:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401) [14:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401) [14:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401) [14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: telepathy-glib (focal-proposed/universe) [0.24.1-2 => 0.24.1-2ubuntu1] (kubuntu) [14:26] RikMills: kubuntu done! This time I think you should be able to get further in the installation process ;p [14:27] sil2100: I did a very quick test on that last iso in the VM, updating ubiquity, and it succeeded [14:29] taking ages to sync to cdimage, but that happens [14:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: aptdaemon (focal-proposed/main) [1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu31 => 1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu32] (desktop-core) [14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sassc (focal-proposed/universe) [3.5.0-1 => 3.6.1-2] (i386-whitelist) (sync) [14:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt-clone (focal-proposed/main) [0.4.1ubuntu2 => 0.4.1ubuntu3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [14:54] can any AA please do some NBS-proposed cleanup? missing build on amd64: rabbitvcs-thunar [14:55] it is in proposed, but not sure why itsn't automatically cleaned it up because there is no rabbitvcs in release pocket [14:55] jbicha, ^^ [15:03] Laney, can you have a look at bug 1870147 [15:03] bug 1870147 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "kubuntu 20200401 installation crashes with dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.NetworkManager.Settings.PermissionDenied: uid 1000 has no permission to perform this operation" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1870147 [15:03] ? [15:06] This bug is not very descriptive [15:07] jibel: when is this crash happening? How can we reproduce? [15:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt-clone (focal-proposed/main) [0.4.1ubuntu2 => 0.4.1ubuntu3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [15:07] But is it destructive? [15:08] sil2100, I asked the OP more info. [15:09] locutus_: NBS-proposed never gets cleaned up automatically [15:10] locutus_: done [15:12] locutus_: I think you missed my comment yesterday about libsass due to disconnect. If libsass's test-depends switched to depending on ruby:any, and libsass itself changed its test dependency to ruby:native, I believe this should work; however I can't test locally because sass-spec-data contains non-normalized utf8 directory names, which causes dpkg to fail to unpack it on a ZFS filesystem. :P [15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager-fortisslvpn (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.8-2 => 1.2.10-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted network-manager-fortisslvpn [source] (focal-proposed) [1.2.10-0ubuntu1] [15:31] Release noting bug #1870018 [15:31] bug 1870018 in casper (Ubuntu) "Option (Ctrl-C) not shown to disable ISO verification" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1870018 [15:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: swig3.0 (focal-proposed/primary) [3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1] [15:36] vorlon, could you please clean up LP: #1868499 , too? [15:36] Launchpad bug 1868499 in kodi (Ubuntu) " Please remove s390x binaries for 2:18.5+dfsg1-0ubuntu3 with all reverse dependencies" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1868499 [15:40] rbalint: yes, looking at it now [15:41] rbalint: there are reverse-build-depends on kodi that build on s390x (kodi-addons-dev). Can you analyze these and feed me a list of what needs removed from other sources, confirming that they also have no revdeps? [15:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nodejs (focal-proposed/universe) [10.17.0~dfsg-2ubuntu6 => 10.19.0~dfsg-3ubuntu1] (kubuntu) [15:42] vorlon, i've listed them all in the bug [15:43] rbalint: kodi-pvr-argustv has xbmc-pvr-argustv as a revdep and is built on s390x [15:43] so you haven't recursed the revdeps [15:45] vorlon, hm, i did recurse, but missed those xbmc ones [15:45] vorlon, thanks, i'll update the list [15:46] now that we have blacklists/whitelists in launchpad, maybe we can make s390x to be a partial port too? [15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: capnproto (focal-proposed/main) [0.7.0-5build1 => 0.7.0-6] (ubuntu-desktop) [15:50] xnox: I don't believe it would be less overhead than the current approach [15:50] xnox: we basically only remove stuff once it ftbfs and impacts its revdeps, putting those into a blacklist in addition to removing the binaries would be more overhead [15:53] mwhudson: hey! Once you're around (not sure if you got pinged about this already), could you take a look at LP: #1865027 ? We suspect it might be something wrong with probert, at least that's how it looks like [15:53] Launchpad bug 1865027 in subiquity "focal-arm64 install fails. No space left on device on /target" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1865027 [15:55] Status update regarding beta: we are still waiting for all rebuilds to finish uploading, we still have one subiquity-related blocker on our radar (details above ^), but most likely this will not require respinning the whole world [15:55] So please proceed with testing of those images that rebuilt already [15:55] (I think we still waiting for desktop) [15:55] I'm testing RPi arm64! [15:56] \o/ [16:28] same [16:28] and armhf of course [16:30] bdmurray: which device(s)? [16:30] plars: oh, that's right Pi4 right now [16:31] bdmurray: I've 1/2GB pi4 on armhf/arm64, moving on to 4GB next. I have automated results for *almost* everything else, but I want to at check sanity with everything on local devices too [16:32] cm3-arm64 is giving me grief for automated tests we run though, because all the dependencies fills up the tiny 4GB emmc on the device :/ [16:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yasm (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-2build1 => 1.3.0-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) [17:01] vorlon, I got reminded already by j_bicha and I did upload them in my ppa already https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+packages [17:01] this is the trigger I'm testing right now https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=focal&arch=i386&package=libsass&ppa=costamagnagianfranco/locutusofborg-ppa&trigger=sass-spec/3.5.4-2ubuntu1&trigger=libsass/3.6.3-1ubuntu1&trigger=sassc/3.6.1-2&trigger=ruby-sass/3.7.4-1ubuntu1&all-proposed=1 [17:01] locutus_: ok [17:05] vorlon, https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal-costamagnagianfranco-locutusofborg-ppa/focal/i386/libs/libsass/20200401_170419_456fb@/log.gz [17:05] I can't make it work [17:05] patced sass-spec, ruby-sass, libsass, and no improvement [17:08] locutus_: since sass-spec and sass-spec-data are Architecture: all, they also need to either be marked Multi-Arch: foreign, or the test deps need to be annotated :native [17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openwsman (focal-proposed/universe) [2.6.5-0ubuntu4 => 2.6.5-0ubuntu5] (no packageset) [17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openwsman [source] (focal-proposed) [2.6.5-0ubuntu5] === Laney changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: Bionic 18.04.4, Eoan 19.10 | Beta Communicator: bdmurray | Archive: Beta Freeze | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Focal Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or gin | melius malum quod cognoscis [17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hp-ppd (focal-proposed/universe) [0.9ubuntu2+really-0.2ubuntu1 => 0.9ubuntu2+really-0.2ubuntu2] (no packageset) [17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hp-ppd [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9ubuntu2+really-0.2ubuntu2] [17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: telepathy-glib (focal-proposed/universe) [0.24.1-2 => 0.24.1-2ubuntu1] (kubuntu) [17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdeconnect (focal-proposed/universe) [1.4-0ubuntu3 => 1.4-0ubuntu4] (kubuntu) [17:58] ^ not needed for the beta [17:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: folder-color (focal-proposed/universe) [0.0.86-0ubuntu2 => 0.0.86-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-mate) [17:58] RikMills: Is there anything you can add to the Beta Release notes about Kubuntu? [18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sundials (focal-proposed/universe) [3.1.2+dfsg-3build5 => 3.1.2+dfsg-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) [18:03] bdmurray: yes, there will be. where are the ubuntu ones? [18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sundials [source] (focal-proposed) [3.1.2+dfsg-3ubuntu1] [18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected telepathy-glib [source] (focal-proposed) [0.24.1-2ubuntu1] [18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected folder-color [source] (focal-proposed) [0.0.86-0ubuntu3] [18:17] bdmurray: bare bones are now @ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FocalFossa/Beta/Kubuntu [18:17] will polish that up by release time [18:18] thanks [18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected apt-clone [source] (focal-proposed) [0.4.1ubuntu3] [18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sass-spec (focal-proposed/universe) [3.5.4-2 => 3.5.4-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sass-spec [source] (focal-proposed) [3.5.4-2ubuntu1] [18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-sass (focal-proposed/universe) [3.7.4-1 => 3.7.4-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-sass [source] (focal-proposed) [3.7.4-1ubuntu1] [18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libsass (focal-proposed/universe) [3.6.3-1 => 3.6.3-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) [18:27] sil2100: yeah [18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected yasm [source] (focal-proposed) [1.3.0-2ubuntu1] [19:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-snapshot (focal-proposed/universe) [1:20200124-1ubuntu1 => 1:20200401-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) [19:07] ubuntu-archive please accept libsass? I fixed the multiarch i386 autopkgtest sadness [19:10] mwhudson: thank you! [19:10] :) [19:12] wow, desktop arm64 still didn't get uploaded [19:13] Actually, scratch that, I see the livefs build succeeded 19 minutes ago! [19:13] "Uploading build" [19:17] "Successfully built"! [19:20] This is a new record! [19:20] ;) [19:20] is it intended that the packages in i386-whitelist land in the unapproved queue? [19:20] sil2100: ^^^ [19:22] anyway, accepted gcc-snapshot [19:22] doko: they shouldn't, but the bot needs to be updated - not sure if we had anyone actioned to do it yet [19:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401) [19:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200401) [19:22] I just remember L_aney talking about it [19:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-snapshot [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20200401-1ubuntu1] [19:23] ok, then I'll accept those [19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libsass [source] (focal-proposed) [3.6.3-1ubuntu1] [19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yasm [source] (focal-proposed) [1.3.0-2ubuntu1] [19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sassc [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.6.1-2] [19:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pikepdf [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.10.3+dfsg-1] [19:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wine-development [source] (focal-proposed) [5.5-1ubuntu1] [19:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rapidjson [source] (focal-proposed) [1.1.0+dfsg2-5ubuntu1] [19:26] hello. I have 1 important and another one .. medium important FFe opened. would u like to highlight them here to see if they can be reviewed [19:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cwiid [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.6.00+svn201-5] [19:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lintian [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.61.0] [19:26] important one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/resource-agents/+bug/1866383 [19:26] Ubuntu bug 1866383 in resource-agents (Ubuntu) "[FFe][Focal] resource-agents need fixes from recent release upstream version" [Undecided,New] [19:26] semi-important one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kronosnet/+bug/1866385 [19:26] Ubuntu bug 1866385 in kronosnet (Ubuntu) "[FFe][focal] kronosnet need fixes from just released upstream version" [Medium,New] [19:29] Okay, now Ubuntu Desktop amd64 rebuild is available. Get testing! [19:31] doko: fyi, i did upload the apt-clone and aptdaemon ftbfs fixes earlier today. I'm not super sure about aptdaemon because it's test suite runs too long and I cancelled it, but it at least built :) [19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (focal-proposed/main) [156 => 157] (ubuntu-desktop) [20:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fence-agents [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.25-2ubuntu1.1] [20:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pacemaker [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.18-0ubuntu1.2] [20:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd-signed (focal-proposed/main) [1.26 => 1.27] (core) [20:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: phpmyadmin (focal-proposed/universe) [4:4.9.5+dfsg1-1ubuntu1 => 4:4.9.5+dfsg1-2] (no packageset) (sync) [20:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted phpmyadmin [sync] (focal-proposed) [4:4.9.5+dfsg1-2] [20:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wine-development (focal-proposed/universe) [5.5-1ubuntu1 => 5.5-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) [20:28] please don't accept wine until the current one migrates :) [20:32] cd [20:32] ~ [20:47] vorlon, i've updated the kodi s390x removal bug [20:49] sil2100: Can you spare a cycle to look at https://launchpad.net/bubblemail? It would be an entirely NEW package that works in the spirit of mailnag. [20:49] teward and I have been working on this one. [20:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tor (focal-proposed/universe) [0.4.2.6-1 => 0.4.2.7-1] (no packageset) (sync) [20:51] Not intended for any seed. [20:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tor [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.4.2.7-1] [20:54] No rdeps. [21:09] bdmurray: thanks for following up with IS [21:10] Laney: no problem [21:10] rbalint: somehow I still don't see any xbmc on there? [21:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: picard (focal-proposed/universe) [2.3-1 => 2.3.1-1] (no packageset) (sync) [21:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted picard [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.3.1-1] [21:23] fossfreedom, hey, I've sponsored you slideshow fix but you should probably ask to r-t people here if you want it to be considered, especially that you didn't attach any bug report or anything that would help with judging the importance of the fix [21:30] rbalint: ah I see you have a separate bug for xbmc [21:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: murano-agent (focal-proposed/universe) [1:5.0.0~b1~git2019121815.2b2cc45-0ubuntu4 => 1:5.0.0~b1~git2019121815.2b2cc45-0ubuntu5] (no packageset) [21:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted murano-agent [source] (focal-proposed) [1:5.0.0~b1~git2019121815.2b2cc45-0ubuntu5] [21:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (focal-proposed/universe) [3.0.4-0ubuntu3 => 4.0.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server) [21:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lxc [source] (focal-proposed) [4.0.0-0ubuntu1] === bdmurray changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: Bionic 18.04.4, Eoan 19.10 | Beta Communicator: None | Archive: Beta Freeze | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Focal Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or gin | melius malum quod cognoscis [21:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: bubblemail (focal-proposed/primary) [0.5-0ubuntu1] [21:58] vorlon: Is it expected that nvidia drivers are build DKMS modules in 20.04? [22:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (focal-proposed/universe) [3.0.4-0ubuntu3 => 1:4.0.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server) [22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxc [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.0.0-0ubuntu1] [22:06] Wimpress: >_< [22:07] I ask, because that is what happened during updates today. Which caused a kernel panic. [22:07] Wimpress: the kernel pieces have landed such that ubuntu-drivers should not /need/ to pull in nvidia-dkms-$ver. However I don't know if ubuntu-drivers does the correct thing yet [22:07] Current status: [22:07] https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/tpThF7NA/IMG_20200401_230526.jpg [22:07] "during updates" so this was an already installed system, not a fresh install? [22:07] Yes, already install 20.04. === mruffell_ is now known as mruffell [22:08] Has been on 20.04 for months. [22:08] Applying daily updates. [22:08] Wimpress: a kernel panic is a strange outcome of compiling kernel modules. [22:08] I agree 🙂 [22:09] Wimpress: but also if this wasn't a fresh install, you might well have installed at a time when nvidia-dkms was the only option [22:09] after you recover you could check what happens if you apt purge nvidia-dkms-440 [22:09] System load is 16 [22:09] While attempting to build DKMS modules which are in a segfault loop. [22:09] cute [22:09] well kill all of that with fire [22:10] Yes. I'll do the 440 purge and gather info. [22:10] So, try and remove DKMS now? [22:15] ubuntu-archive: No rush but if you get bored or have ten minutes to review bubblemail that'd be great. There's an in-the-works process in Debian to get it into Debian so until then we're using -0ubuntuX notations on the bubblemail packages. (Eickmeyer would like this to be available for focal, himself, and it's not going to be seeded anywhere.) [22:15] but *no rush* [22:15] *lurks* [22:18] There is a corresponding gnome shell extension that the upstream would like packaged at some point, but that can wait. [22:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireguard-linux-compat (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.20200330-1ubuntu1 => 1.0.20200401-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [22:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireguard-linux-compat [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.20200401-1ubuntu1] [22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cgit (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.1+git2.18.0-1 => 1.2.3+git2.25.1-1] (no packageset) (sync) [22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: telegram-desktop (focal-proposed/universe) [1.9.21+ds-1 => 2.0.1+ds-1] (no packageset) (sync) [22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted telegram-desktop [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.0.1+ds-1] [22:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cgit [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.2.3+git2.25.1-1] [23:01] vorlon: attempting to remove nvidia-dkms-440 want to remove the entirety of the nvidia drivers. [23:11] Running 'ubuntu-drivers autoinstall' is pulling in nvidia-dkms-440' === tumbleweed_ is now known as tumbleweed [23:39] The 390, 435 and 440 drivers all segfault while attempting to build DKMS modules. Net result, currently impossible to install nvidia drivers. [23:40] I've captured some logs and crash reports [23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: stress-ng (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.05-1 => 0.11.07-1] (no packageset) (sync) [23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted stress-ng [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.11.07-1]