-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxcfs [source] (eoan-proposed) [3.0.4-2ubuntu1]00:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxcfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.2]00:30
tewardat this point in the cycle, do seed changes need Release Team approval?01:01
tewardfor flavors01:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (focal-proposed/main) [1:3.36.1-1ubuntu2 => 1:3.36.1-1ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)01:06
vorlonteward: not "approval", but coordination at least since freeze lists would need updated etc01:40
tewardvorlon: OK, you need to talk to Eickmeyer then before I sync this per his request01:41
tewardbug #187024801:41
ubot5bug 1870248 in obs-studio (Ubuntu) "Sync obs-studio 25.0.3+dfsg1-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187024801:41
vorlonsurely the seeding is separate from the syncing?01:41
EickmeyerA similar sync request never happened last cycle.01:42
EickmeyerIn fact, it was never even looked at.01:42
EickmeyerIt's already seeded. Just needs a sync.01:42
vorlonok, that wasn't what I understood as "seed change"01:42
EickmeyerNot a seed change, teward.01:43
vorlonso you can sync anything you think is appropriate, and it will land in the unapproved queue due to the freeze01:43
EickmeyerIt's already seeded.01:43
tewardbleh i'm dead then01:43
tewardvorlon: so if we sync it then it just needs approved then, assuming that the seed manager OKs?01:43
tewardi.e. "JFDI" since Eickmeyer asked?01:43
teward(at least from me running syncpackage that is)01:43
vorlonWimpress: nvidia-dkms-440 is at version 440.64-0ubuntu3 in the focal release pocket.  linux-modules-nvidia-440-generic Provides: nvidia-dkms-440 (= 440.64-0ubuntu2).  We have version skew that shouldn't be allowed to happen but that we currently don't have infrastructure to prevent. :/01:43
vorlonapw, tseliot: ^^ lrm vs nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 skew in the release pocket01:44
tewardEickmeyer: sync in progress.  *goes to find coffee*01:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: obs-studio (focal-proposed/universe) [24.0.6+dfsg1-1build2 => 25.0.3+dfsg1-2] (ubuntustudio) (sync)01:46
teward^ there it is in unapproved.01:48
tewardrelated: Eickmeyer (ubuntustudio lead) asked for the sync01:48
apwvorlon, is this the piece where automated upgrades would prevent update but manual dist-upgrade will allow skew to form ...01:49
apwWimpress, it is really causing and actual dmesg report ?01:49
apwvorlon, or are we shy some breaks still01:50
apw(on the nvidia binaries)01:51
Eickmeyerteward: ack01:51
Wimpressapw: I've got to the bottom of the segfaults and kernel panics.02:15
WimpressNot us.02:15
WimpressTL;DR Z390 motherboards and over optimistic power targets in early BIOS revisions (that I was running) lead to segfaults due to stressing CPU cores.02:16
WimpressThat said, not sure the intended design is building nvidia driver DKMS modules based on prior chats with vorlon02:17
WimpressFollowing a BIOS update which resulted in a new XMP memory profile and lower boost clock for unicore and multicore, the DKMS module builds successfully complete.02:19
WimpressAnd I'm back in business.02:19
Wimpresssarnold: o/02:21
sarnoldhey Wimpress :)02:21
vorlonapw: I don't see any breaks around here04:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: initramfs-tools (focal-proposed/main) [0.136ubuntu2 => 0.136ubuntu3] (core, i386-whitelist)04:37
vorlonEickmeyer: so are you expecting a respin of ubuntustudio beta image for this obs-studio update?04:40
Eickmeyervorlon: No, it’s not “OMG must be in Beta” important, more like “let’s get this in for final” important.04:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted obs-studio [sync] (focal-proposed) [25.0.3+dfsg1-2]05:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nodejs [source] (focal-proposed) [10.19.0~dfsg-3ubuntu1]05:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: llvm-toolchain-9 (focal-proposed/main) [1:9.0.1-10 => 1:9.0.1-11] (i386-whitelist) (sync)06:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: telegram-desktop (focal-proposed/universe) [1.9.21+ds-1 => 2.0.1+ds-1] (no packageset) (sync)06:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ocaml-deriving-ocsigen (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7.1-1ubuntu1 => 0.7.1-1.1] (no packageset) (sync)06:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ocaml-deriving-ocsigen [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.7.1-1.1]06:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected telegram-desktop [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.0.1+ds-1]06:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rlottie (focal-proposed/universe) [0~git20190721.24346d0+dfsg-2build1 => 0~git20200305.a717479+dfsg-1] (no packageset) (sync)06:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rlottie [sync] (focal-proposed) [0~git20200305.a717479+dfsg-1]06:26
sil2100mwhudson: hey! Thanks for working on that subiquity bug06:57
sil2100mwhudson: did you get any confirmation of anyone that it fixes the bug?06:57
jibelsil2100, Hi, do you have the diff of the manifests between ubuntu desktop 0331 and 0401 ?07:08
sil2100jibel: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/RG732BVvfB/07:11
sil2100mwhudson: is there an easy way for paride to refresh subiquity to an edge version after booting for testing? I guess so, right?07:17
mwhudsonsil2100: yeah, drop to shell and snap refresh --edge subiquity07:20
mwhudsonsil2100: no, no confirmation yet07:21
sil2100paride: once you're up, could you give it a spin? Since if that helps, I'd like it promoted to stable and images respun ASAP ;) ^07:23
paridesil2100, mwhudson, up07:28
parideI've just read the new comments on the bugs07:28
parideand I'm going to try edge07:28
mwhudsonhmm i think edge might have some other problems07:29
mwhudsonbut it would be interesting to know if it segfaults07:29
paridewell let's see07:29
mwhudsonoh ffs07:30
mwhudsonparide: just don't rush :)07:30
mwhudsonif you go a bit slowly i think it'll be fine...07:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-seamicroclient (focal-proposed/universe) [0.4.0+2016.05.20.git.40ee44c664-2ubuntu1 => 0.4.0+2016.05.20.git.40ee44c664-3ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)07:32
sil2100paride: thanks!07:32
sil2100mwhudson: hm, since you're saying edge is a bit risky right now, what would be the best steps to get this fix into stable then?07:33
mwhudsonsil2100: ah i think i've found the bug and i think it's probably in stable already...07:34
sil2100mwhudson: do you have separate branches per channel?07:34
mwhudsonsil2100: in general no, such a thing can always be arranged though07:34
sil2100Ouchy ;)07:34
mwhudsonit's an obscure race, you'll only hit it if you're racing through the ui07:34
mwhudsonor on a very slow network07:35
cpaelzerhi release team - I'd ask for the fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1869629 which is in focal-unapproved to be evalauted and accepted07:35
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1869629 in snapd "please add /etc/mdns.allow to /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/mdns" [Undecided,Triaged]07:35
cpaelzerit could cause test issues in various places (fix is in apparmor abstraction) - so having it fixed should reduce the noise of the beta test feedback a bit07:35
sil2100cpaelzer: the usual question: that's for post-beta, right?07:35
cpaelzerpost-beta but pre-release07:36
cpaelzerbut if post-beta someone shoudl know that any kind of mdns issues are likely due to that07:36
mwhudsonsil2100, paride: i've just landed a branch that should make debugging the bug of doom easier07:37
mwhudsonsil2100, paride: so if it does recur, retrying with the snap that will hit edge in 20 mins or so might make sense07:38
cpaelzersil2100: totally different question - riscv is now enabled in bileto PPAs and since the checkbox is disabled I can't disable it07:38
cpaelzersil2100 any chance to not have riscv enabled there?07:38
cpaelzerwasn't an issue a few hours ago ...07:39
cpaelzerwgrant:  you are MR riscv :-) - do you have a chance to disable riscv on a single PPA for me to be able to go on atm https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4000 ?07:40
wgrantcpaelzer: Huh, I wonder how that appeared there07:41
wgrantOhhh, maybe bileto automatically configures all arches07:41
wgrantriscv64 isn't enabled in the primary archive yet...07:41
cpaelzerI know wgrant, but bileto usualyl enables all07:42
cpaelzerand until sil2100 found some time to make that be differentwe'd prefer to have some way to disable it07:42
wgrantYeah, we didn't consider things dynamically creating PPAs using the whole set of processors, rather than just mirroring the primary rachive07:42
wgrantcpaelzer: I've disabled riscv64 on that PPA and cancelled the build07:42
wgrantI don't know if that'll be enough to make bileto happy07:43
cpaelzerwgrant: I can see why users can't enable it (like int he old devirt days) but maybe LP could allow everyone to "disable" it ?07:43
cpaelzeris that hard?07:43
wgrantAnyone can, on their own PPAs07:43
cpaelzernope (for me) I can't on https://launchpad.net/~paelzer/+archive/ubuntu/test-is-riscv-on/+edit07:44
cpaelzerthe checkbox is greyed out07:44
cpaelzerI can neither enable (my PPA) nor disable (Bileto PPA that starts with all enabled)07:44
wgrantEnablement is meant to be restricted07:45
sil2100cpaelzer: uh, yeah, we never had this problem, might need to tweak bileto a bit07:45
wgrantIt's possible the UI disables the checkbox in both cases07:45
wgrantBut the API should allow disablement07:45
cpaelzerwgrant: is there a cmdline to disable it through API?07:45
cpaelzerI might be able to use that against my bileto PPAs as well (not just the personal ones)07:46
sil2100cpaelzer: since IIRC bileto periodically fixes up the PPA right now, so that even if you disable it manaully, it will most probably switch it back on07:46
sil2100(not sure if it does that for arches, but does for other stuff)07:46
wgrantsil2100: How does bileto calculate the set of archs?07:46
cpaelzersil2100: bad that is, but good to know :-)07:46
wgrantLooks like it might just be all processors07:46
cpaelzerthat might also have been what swicthed it on07:46
cpaelzersince I as using that PPA for a while without issues07:46
sil2100wgrant: I think right now it's just 'all', but maybe it should be smarter ;p07:46
wgrantcpaelzer: It's just setting archive.processors in launchpadlib07:47
sil2100Will sit down on that in some minutes07:47
wgrantI'll remove the chroot for now to prevent any more builds from being created07:48
paridemwhudson, mmh the install still failed but it didn't crash07:52
mwhudsonparide: oh yay07:52
paride /target is mounted so no ENOSPC. Let's see what's in the logs07:52
mwhudsonparide: can you add my keys?07:53
mwhudsonparide: or pastebin the .crash i guess07:54
sil2100wgrant, cpaelzer: ok, this will be a rather easy fix, will push it in some moments07:59
wgrantsil2100: Great, thanks.07:59
paridemwhudson, I attached the crash file to the bug. It's too big to pastebin08:00
mwhudsoni should deploy myself a mcdivitt08:01
parideI also noticed it contains a broken string with non-utf8 non-ascii data, but this is unrelated08:01
RikMillsmorning. do we have any re-spine worth bugs? or looking ok so far?08:01
paridenoticed because pastebinit didn't like it08:01
cpaelzernice to hear that - thanks sil210008:02
mwhudson FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'efibootmgr': 'efibootmgr'08:02
sil2100RikMills: morning! So far I saw nothing like that on the ISOtracker (besides the known subiquity issues)08:02
paridemwhudson, /target/usr/bin/efibootmgr is there08:03
mwhudsonparide: is it there in the live session?08:03
paridemwhudson, no, at least not in the obvious locations08:03
mwhudsonparide: well isn't that a thing08:04
parideit is!08:04
mwhudsonparide: i am now very confused08:06
sil2100RikMills: but anyway, mwhudson and paride are working on those, and I'm pretty sure this will not require any other re-spins besides subiquity - so I think all other isos might be 'final'08:06
RikMillsok. fingers crossed then :)08:07
paridesil2100, there's the s390x one08:07
paridewhich appears to be subiquity too, but there's a crash in the logs08:07
parideso I don't really know what the root cause is08:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swig3.0 [source] (focal-proposed) [3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1]08:16
mwhudsonas far as i can tell the s390x and arm64 subiquity things are the same08:18
mwhudsoni wonder if i have tried a uefi install recently08:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swig3.0 [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1] (no packageset)08:23
paridemwhudson, that is what I was hoping for08:23
paridea manual install run with subiquity edge on s390x succeeded08:24
paridenow I'm running the -edge jenkins job08:24
paridewe'll know in a few minutes08:25
cpaelzersil2100: wgrant: FYI as expected the riscv build was turned on again on my PPA08:33
cpaelzersil2100: once you got to code and deploy something let me know so I can retry things08:33
=== Laney changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: Bionic 18.04.4, Eoan 19.10 | Beta Communicator: Laney | Archive: Beta Freeze | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Focal Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or gin | melius malum quod cognoscis
mwhudsonparide: yes a uefi install fails locally on amd64 with edge08:34
mwhudsonparide: this seems suboptimal08:34
mwhudsonparide: i guess i should stage efibootmgr into the snap08:35
paridemwhudson, mmh :/ we test edge but not with uefi08:35
paridemaybe we should switch to testing uefi by default at some point, and bios boot only as part of the 'smoke-default' test08:37
parideopposite of what we're doing now08:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zsnapd (focal-proposed/universe) [0.8.11h-1ubuntu1 => 0.8.11h-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)08:37
mwhudsonparide: would probably make sense08:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zsnapd [source] (focal-proposed) [0.8.11h-1ubuntu2]08:38
mwhudsoneacb655263bc2177c4d7f9173bc3efd4a9e6bf75 in curtin invokes efibootmgr on the host not target08:39
mwhudsoni wonder if that was intended08:39
* mwhudson digs up the mp08:39
sil2100cpaelzer: yeah, eek, still need a few minutes, got context switched08:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-report (focal-proposed/main) [1.6.0 => 1.6.1] (ubuntu-desktop)08:43
mwhudsonparide: i dropped to a shell, installed efibootmgr and the install completed (on arm64)08:46
paridemwhudson, I had a look at eacb655263bc2177c4d7f9173bc3efd4a9e6bf75 and nothing makes me think that invoking efibootmgr from the host is intentional08:54
mwhudsonparide: yeah i think so too08:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swig3.0 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1]08:55
xnoxmwhudson:  i think it is intended to run efibootmgr on the host, not in target.08:55
xnoxmwhudson:  and i think we used to depend/install efibootmgr, but then dropped. I wonder if cloud/maas images are affected too. Although normally curtin tries to install missing deps but yeah, snap.08:56
mwhudsonxnox: it would work totally fine if it did try to install it08:57
mwhudsonit's in the pool08:57
paridemwhudson, and I can't tell why https://github.com/CanonicalLtd/subiquity/pull/670 made the crash go away, if that's actually what did it...08:58
gitbotCanonicalLtd issue (Pull request) 670 in subiquity "write netplan directly to the target" [Closed]08:58
mwhudsonparide: because it means curtin net-meta auto does less stuff08:58
mwhudsonparide: i don't really get it, to be sure08:58
xnoxmwhudson:  ah08:59
mwhudsonxnox, paride: https://github.com/CanonicalLtd/subiquity/pull/67808:59
gitbotCanonicalLtd issue (Pull request) 678 in subiquity "stage efibootmgr for now" [Open]08:59
xnoxif we don't understand it, let's ship it! that's how release weeks work, right?!08:59
paridexnox, at least it's not release week, yet!09:00
mwhudsoni would like to understand where the crash came from yes :(09:00
xnoxdry-run mode09:00
parideok :)09:00
xnoxmwhudson:  keep the image around, i guess =/09:00
mwhudsonxnox: eh i was going to test that the efibootmgr change actually helps before i merged it :)09:01
mwhudson(it does, though)09:01
sil2100cpaelzer: ok, we need to wait for the nearest auto-deploy cycle for bileto09:02
sil2100cpaelzer: (and hope that the instance won't explode like the last time after an update, for no reason)09:02
* mwhudson starts yet another subiquity edge build09:05
* sil2100 fixes publish-image-set to support the renamed raspi images09:15
xnoxmwhudson:  ah, ok09:15
sil2100cpaelzer: ...this happens every 30 minutes, so I htink we missed the previous tick. Do in ~15 minutes the changes should be deployed09:16
sil2100Laney: do you think it makes sense to pre-publish only the desktop images?09:17
Laneysil2100: why not09:20
mwhudsonoh ffs eftbootmgr not available everywhere of course09:21
rbalintcpaelzer, chrony and ntp are now coinstallable in focal unlike in eoan, imo we should pick https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-ntp-team/ntp/-/commit/a696bf0bef7118039f04b41cb0688980f2ebe90b after the beta is out09:33
rbalintcpaelzer, i also rely on it with my fix in https://salsa.debian.org/systemd-team/systemd/-/merge_requests/61 but i can special case ntp if needed09:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bedtools (focal-proposed/universe) [2.27.1+dfsg-4 => 2.27.1+dfsg-4ubuntu1] (no packageset)09:35
xnoxmwhudson:  yeas, not on ibm =)09:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bedtools [source] (focal-proposed) [2.27.1+dfsg-4ubuntu1]09:36
mwhudsonxnox: i am now trying to understand undocumented snapcraft features09:37
xnoxmwhudson:  we should rename it to witchcraft09:39
mwhudsonxnox: haha09:39
mwhudsongranny weathercraft09:39
sil2100cpaelzer: ok, looks like it's working \o/ https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4002 <- as an example09:41
sil2100cpaelzer: bileto should auto-correct your PPA automatically at some point, but a diff on the PPA might trigger it earlier09:42
wgrantThanks sil210009:44
mwhudsonxnox, paride: ok building yet another another edge snap09:58
mwhudsonxnox, paride: please beat the heck out of this while i am sleeping :)09:58
xnoxjust beat it beat it09:59
xnoxbdmurray:  omg, i understand what you mean now.10:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: llvm-toolchain-10 (focal-proposed/main) [1:10.0.0-1ubuntu1 => 1:10.0.0-1ubuntu2] (i386-whitelist)10:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: binutils-riscv64-unknown-elf (focal-proposed/universe) [2.32.2019.08+dfsg-1 => 2.34-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)10:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted binutils-riscv64-unknown-elf [source] (focal-proposed) [2.34-0ubuntu1]10:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted llvm-toolchain-10 [source] (focal-proposed) [1:10.0.0-1ubuntu2]10:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unity-greeter (focal-proposed/universe) [18.04.0+20.04.20200312-0ubuntu1 => 18.04.0+20.04.20200312-0ubuntu2] (mythbuntu)10:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-snapshot (focal-proposed/universe) [1:20200401-1ubuntu1 => 1:20200402-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)10:05
* sil2100 fingers crossed that the new subiquity will fix the world10:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-snapshot [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20200402-0ubuntu1]10:05
paridesil2100, count me in, but let's remember there's something crashing hidden somewhere10:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wine-development [source] (focal-proposed) [5.5-2ubuntu1]10:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-settings (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.4 => 20.04.5] (ubuntu-desktop)10:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (focal-proposed/main) [2.44+20.04 => 2.44.2+20.04] (core)10:23
cpaelzersil2100: thanks for the work my ppa 4000 still isn't reset (despite runnign a diff a minute ago)10:33
cpaelzerI'll give it some time and recheck in a bit10:33
cpaelzerthat PPA seems stuck overall10:33
cpaelzeralso binaries won't publish for more than 2h now10:33
cpaelzermaybe I should just abandon and use a new one10:33
cpaelzermaybe that risc build fail + cancel + deactivate arch + reactivate arch confused it10:34
cpaelzerI can work with a new ticket just as much, so we don't have to debug the old one10:34
RikMillscpaelzer: I have things in a ppa pending for 1 3/4 hrs. I think the ppa publisher is backlogged or some problem10:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libarchive (focal-proposed/main) [3.4.0-1ubuntu2 => 3.4.0-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)10:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (focal-proposed/main) [0.8.3-1ubuntu10 => 0.8.3-1ubuntu11] (core)10:39
didrockssil2100: this one ^10:40
sil2100Laney is on it o/10:40
didrocksack :)10:40
wgrantRikMills, cpaelzer: Forgot to turn something back on, sorry. Fixing.10:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (focal-proposed) [0.8.3-1ubuntu11]10:44
cpaelzerah ok then wgrant10:45
cpaelzerwgrant: what is the time we should re-check - immediately or in Xmin?10:46
wgrantcpaelzer: The PPA publisher isn't instantaneous. Will be 10 minutes at least10:46
LaneyThat zfs-linux is looking like a respin :(10:46
cpaelzeryeah I was expecting some delay, thanks for providing an ~ETA10:46
didrockssorry Laney, sil2100 :/10:47
didrocksworked fine on already installed system, the bug is only on new install after the *second* boot (but it’s the first one which silently screws things up)10:48
sil2100And I have hoped we won't do any respins ;/10:50
sil2100Oh well!10:50
seb128could we also get ubuntu-settings approved if we respin?10:56
seb128it's only a change to our default launcher config to update for the gnome-software -> snap-store change we did in focal10:56
seb128the icon is currently missing due to the wrong name being used10:57
sil2100From the initial look of things, we'll need to respin: ubuntu, xubuntu, ubuntu-mate, ubuntu-budgie, ubuntustudio10:59
sil2100seb128: I think we'd like to play it very very safe and just get this one thing in, respin ASAP and hopefully get stuff tested in time10:59
seb128it's a gsettings override, no code10:59
seb128but as you wish11:00
sil2100paride: how's the new subiquity looking?11:13
paridesil2100, edge work on both arm64 and s390x11:13
paride(I commented on the bugs)11:13
paridesil2100, I think we're waiting for rharper take on mwhudson's question here: https://code.launchpad.net/~raharper/curtin/+git/curtin/+merge/37967511:14
parideto understand if the problem has to be fixed in subiquity or curtin11:14
sil2100paride: awesome! So late in the cycle I'd only want to get this into stable and released! Should we poke xnox to get the edge subiquity promoted?11:18
xnoxsil2100:  i could release it to stable/ubuntu-20.0411:19
xnoxsil2100:  not sure about releasing to stable (which is used by bionic too)11:19
sil2100xnox: ok, as long as we can get it for teh beta, I'm fine with ubuntu-20.0411:19
sil2100paride: are you relatively happy with the subiquity from edge in that case? Since the sooner we can get this into stable/ubuntu-20.04 the sooner we can respin the subiquity images11:20
paridexnox, that's a good point, why bionic-live-server-arm64 works if stable is the same for both11:21
parideand efibootmgr is missing11:21
xnoxparide:  because curtin only calls it for some series, not others?11:22
xnoxor some other per-series behaviour11:22
paridemmh don't we always need to call it at least once to add the boot entry?11:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: firefox (focal-proposed/main) [74.0+build3-0ubuntu1 => 75.0+build1-0ubuntu1] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)11:23
paridesil2100, I am from this first round of tests, but I'm not fully aware of all the bits we have in edge that we don't have in stable11:24
parideso I'm not sure there is stuff in edge we don't expect to land in stable for the moment11:25
paridebut xnox can probably give the green light on this11:25
xnoxparide:  because bionic tests are not run in uefi11:30
paridexnox, arm!11:30
xnoxSkipping install of {'efibootmgr', 'vlan', 'bridge-utils', 'grub-efi-arm64', 'grub-efi-arm64-signed', 'ifenslave'}.  Not needed on netplan system.11:39
xnoxstart: cmd-install/stage-curthooks/builtin/cmd-curthooks: Installing packages on target system: ['efibootmgr', 'grub-efi-arm64', 'grub-efi-arm64-signed']11:39
xnoxis confusing11:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (focal-proposed/main) [3.192.29 => 3.192.30] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)11:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pysmi (focal-proposed/main) [0.3.2-1build1 => 0.3.2-2] (ubuntu-server) (sync)11:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-pysnmp4 (focal-proposed/main) [4.4.6+repack1-1build1 => 4.4.6+repack1-2] (ubuntu-server) (sync)11:44
xnoxsil2100:  promoted edge subiquity to latest/stable/ubuntu-20.04 i think we can respin subiquity images for focal beta11:46
xnoxsil2100:  and figure out more details if curtin is correct; and if bionic is affected later11:46
sil2100Let me spin those in a moment11:48
sil2100Laney: ^11:49
Laneyprobably do those separately as well11:49
sil2100I guess I'll do it in 2 batches, one for s390x, ppc64el and amd64 and one for arm6411:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chromium-browser (focal-proposed/universe) [80.0.3987.87-0ubuntu1 => 80.0.3987.162-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)12:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-riscv64-unknown-elf (focal-proposed/universe) [ => 9.3.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)12:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-riscv64-unknown-elf [source] (focal-proposed) [9.3.0-0ubuntu1]12:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnutls28 (focal-proposed/main) [ => 3.6.12-2] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)12:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lintian [source] (focal-proposed) [2.59.0ubuntu1]12:30
oibafHi, can someone please sync https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/collectd/+bug/187033913:00
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1870339 in collectd (Ubuntu) "FFe: Sync collectd 5.11.0-2 (universe) from Debian sid (main)" [Undecided,New]13:00
oibafand https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freeradius/+bug/1870340 ? Thanks!13:01
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1870340 in freeradius (Ubuntu) "FFe: Sync freeradius 3.0.21+dfsg-1 (main) from Debian sid (main)" [Undecided,New]13:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: session-migration (focal-proposed/main) [0.3.4 => 0.3.5] (desktop-core)13:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.9-3 => 1.3.9-4] (core) (sync)13:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200402)13:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200402)13:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200402)13:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200402)13:27
sil2100Subiquity images respun ^!13:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xxhash (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-1 => 0.7.3-1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)13:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-8 (focal-proposed/universe) [8.4.0-3ubuntu1 => 8.4.0-3ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)13:51
paridejibel, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/187035613:55
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1870356 in gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) "Can't connect to paired bluetooth devices via g-c-c; works with blueman" [Undecided,New]13:55
dokohmm, why is gcc-8 in the core seed?13:58
LaneySo status update on the respin - we're waiting for proposed-migration to give us some green and copy zfs-linux14:01
Laneythen as soon as rmadison shows it's published in the release pocket we'll be hitting the butan14:02
LaneyA couple of hours out at least14:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.525.42]14:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvncserver (focal-proposed/main) [0.9.12+dfsg-8 => 0.9.12+dfsg-9] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)14:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ms-gsl (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-2 => 2.1.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)14:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ms-gsl [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.1.0-1]14:28
seb128paride, jibel, can we get champagne bugs at a minimum be reported with apport? Reports without any information about the package versions used, nor the desktop environment nor logs are creating extra work...14:31
parideseb128, let me add some missing info to that one, in any case I'm file if it's demoted as non-champagne14:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mypaint (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1 => 2.0.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)14:46
Laneyzfs-linux migrated, waiting for it to publish14:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-traceback2 (focal-proposed/main) [1.4.0-5build1 => 1.4.0-5ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)14:49
sil2100paride: btw. can you double check that the latest subiquity images we re-spun are good to go?14:52
tewardsil2100: can you approve mypaint? it fixes a Fails To Run bug.14:53
teward(because of missing deps)14:53
teward(on behalf of the Studio team, cc RikMills)14:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jemalloc (focal-proposed/universe) [5.2.1-1build1 => 5.2.1-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntustudio)14:56
LaneyOK it's arrived15:08
LaneyI'm going to respin everything that seeds zfs-linux now15:09
paridesil2100, the jenkins jobs failed :/ checking why.15:10
sil2100Laney: \o/15:13
sil2100paride: ouch15:13
Laneymy smart idea about doing the builds in parallel doesn't work because there's a lock15:21
julianklocks are nice15:21
Laneythey are made to be picked15:21
sil2100Laney: just fire up the amd64 one for now and them arm6415:24
Laneyam doing15:24
Laneysil2100: hm, it's on server too, should we respin that or leave it?15:31
sil2100zfs? Oh crap, forgot15:37
sil2100Been a while since I last installed a server15:37
sil2100xnox: there is an option for using zfs in the subiquity installer?15:38
Laneysil2100: but this bug/fix shouldn't apply there anyway, so perhaps it's ok to not respin15:44
sil2100If that's the case, I wouldn't care for beta I think15:45
* sil2100 is a bit distracted with everything going on15:46
xnoxsil2100:  no15:46
Laneyok good15:47
sil2100SHIP IT15:47
sil2100I mean, not respin-it15:47
vorlondoko: why does your gnutls28 sync drop xnox's default-priority-string handling in debian/rules?15:50
cpaelzersil2100: just FYI riscv still gets enabled in PPAs, but I understand that you are busy with other things right now - so really just FYI15:50
xnoxblock-propsed! or reject!15:51
xnoxvorlon:  doko: ^ we have different levels set15:52
vorlonxnox, doko: rejected15:52
xnoxvorlon:  doko: i'll look into merging openssl & gnutls2815:53
xnox(separetely, not together)15:53
juliankmerge two tls libraries into one15:53
vorlonmerging them together sounds good15:53
juliankgo for it15:53
vorlonlet's do that15:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnutls28 [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.6.12-2]15:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mstflint (eoan-proposed/universe) [4.11.0+1-1 => 4.13.3+2-2~ubuntu19.10.1] (no packageset)15:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mstflint (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.8.0-2 => 4.13.3+2-2~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)15:54
parideseb128, thanks for finding the upstream bug for the bluetooth issue. I still think the "works with blueman" bit of information was a key part of my bug report, the one that allowed me to point to blame gnome-control-center. But OK.15:59
seb128paride, I find it quite confusing 'why is the description talking about blueman. what does blueman has to do with it. is he even using ubuntu/gnome'16:00
seb128paride, usually it's best to focus the description to be short and explaining the problem16:00
seb128then you can add comments with side points16:00
sil2100cpaelzer: hey! So uh, apparently riscv64 is now enabled in the archive16:09
sil2100cpaelzer: so not much I can do without hard-coding it in bileto right now ;/16:09
sil2100Since if you check via LP API lp.distributions['ubuntu'].main_archive.processors now has riscv6416:10
sil2100While in the morning it didn't, as we expected16:10
sil2100paride: did you manage to take a look why the jenkins job failed? Anything wrong with the images?16:16
paridesil2100, I am still not sure, I am now trying manually16:17
sil2100Beta release status update: as some of you might have seen the zfs-linux and subiquity fixes have migrated and we are now rebuilding the images that were affected16:17
sil2100Those should be built in some time - taking longer than usual due to the networking weirdness16:17
paridesil2100, seb128, local install works, but I didn't test all the archs yet. Looking at the jenkins jobs again as it's pretty strange they're failing16:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (focal-proposed/universe) [1:4.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:4.0.0-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)16:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxc [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.0.0-0ubuntu2]16:32
parideseb128, sil2100, xnox, paramiko can't ssh to the testbed system: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/KmhhpsXhjT/16:34
parideI think paramiko is not able to handle all types of key yet, I already saw this but now I don't remember the details16:35
paridewas anything related to this changed in the latest respin?16:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (disco-proposed/main) [2.42.1+19.04 => 2.44.2+19.04] (core)16:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (eoan-proposed/main) [2.42.1+19.10 => 2.44.2+19.10] (core)16:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (bionic-proposed/main) [2.42.1+18.04 => 2.44.2+18.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)16:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.42.1 => 2.44.2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)16:39
bdmurraythose crazy snapd developers16:42
bdmurrayShould "Ctrl+C" to cancel filesystem checks work in QEMU?17:06
jibelbdmurray, it does, but it's slow to react17:08
bdmurrayyeah, slow enough that I got bored17:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-meta (focal-proposed/universe) [1.261 => 1.262] (ubuntu-mate)17:09
sil2100paride: the latest respin should have been new-subiquity only17:09
sil2100(and zfs-linux, but that's not relevant to the subiquity images)17:10
bdmurrayjibel: I'm testing bug 1824905 and it only took me like 3s. Do you know if this is better?17:10
ubot5bug 1824905 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Eoan) "Provide user feedback when running ubuntu-drivers [was:Long pause when selecting 3rd party drivers during install]" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/182490517:10
sil2100Ah, actually, zfs-linux didn't change for subiquity images17:10
jibelbdmurray, well I had to press CTRL+C like 10 times17:10
bdmurrayjibel: I've no idea if I *had* to but I did too. ;-)17:10
bdmurrayIt made it to 99% and then said check skipped17:12
handsome_fengHi, I will mark ubuntukylin ready now although there are still some problems (will fix them after beta ASAP), It is  01:14 now in china... Thank you release team and happy release day! :)17:13
jibelNo work has been done to improve it and there is still a long delay to switch to next page17:13
jibelbdmurray, ^17:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mstflint [sync] (eoan-proposed) [4.13.3+2-2~ubuntu19.10.1]17:15
* Laney cries17:20
bdmurrayWell then release note it is17:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been marked as ready17:22
bdmurrayrelease_notes_url points to http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes?...17:27
bdmurraySo do we need to ping IS about the redirect?17:27
bdmurraysil2100: ^^17:27
Laneywhere's that used?17:28
bdmurrayubiquity/plugins/ubi-language.py:_release_notes_url_path = '/cdrom/.disk/release_notes_url'17:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mstflint [source] (eoan-proposed) [4.13.3+2-2~ubuntu19.10.1]17:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mstflint [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.13.3+2-2~ubuntu18.04.1]17:32
sil2100The build uploads feel even slower today17:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mstflint [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.13.3+2-2~ubuntu18.04.1]17:36
* Laney holds sil2100 17:40
Laneyit's still April 2 somewhere on the planet for quite some time ...17:40
LaneyI did once send a release announcement in Honolulu time17:42
fo0barhttps://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2018-April/000231.html <-- check the time; ruined by mailman converting BST to UTC17:46
* Laney was in that room17:48
Laneyit was a stressful one17:48
fo0baryeah, I was handling cloud cache image uploads at the time, I think everything finished at about 23:59:1517:49
EickmeyerWhich bug had the zfs issue?17:49
Eickmeyer(somoene filed a duplicate)17:49
LaneyDon't know if there's a bug report17:49
LaneyFeel free to close it with a link to the zfs-linux upload I'd say17:50
fo0barbdmurray: oh, and anything under ubuntu.com is now exclusively in webteam's domain; IS has no control over frontend content17:50
EickmeyerI changed it from Ubuntu Studio (project) to zfs-ubuntu and marked it "Fix Released".17:50
xnoxparide: hm but the machine has networking?17:50
didrocksEickmeyer: second reboot after installation drop into grub command line17:51
fo0bar(previously the FEs had hardcoded redirects for some stuff, but that was eliminated about a month ago)17:51
Eickmeyerdidrocks: bug 187039517:51
ubot5bug 1870395 in zfs-linux (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu Studio 20.04 ZFS Option Fails to Boot" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187039517:51
EickmeyerLooks like it.17:51
paridexnox, utah wait for it to reply to a ping before trying to ssh17:51
Laneyfo0bar: That's probably when it broke ;-)17:51
paridethis is *super* strange17:51
didrocksEickmeyer: hum, shouldn’t be on first boot, but the report is vague17:52
Eickmeyerdidrocks: Agreed. Should it be "Incomplete"?17:52
fo0barLaney: likely.  during the migration, IS had given the list to webteam to cull and integrate the rest into the webapps, which they did.  but to webteam's credit, it was about 15 years worth of cruft, so it's not like every entry could be looked at with precision :)17:53
xnoxparide:  on 30th of march new openssh did land17:54
xnoxparide:  the 8.2p1 release, not sure if that changes things17:54
bdmurrayfo0bar: oh cool, only a month of breakge17:54
fo0barof course, that's just a guess.  IANACE (anymore), so this is from memory, heh17:55
paridexnox, it must be that. I checked the d/changelog and the latest entry was from february, but now I remember it was held in proposed for a long time17:56
paridessh(1), sshd(8), ssh-keygen(1): this release removes the "ssh-rsa" (RSA/SHA1) algorithm from those accepted for certificate signatures17:58
paridefrom the changelog17:58
paridesure enough utah is using a deprecated key type17:58
didrocksEickmeyer: let’s keep it like this and ping me if you have people opening bugs17:59
Eickmeyerdidrocks: Ok, will do. :)18:01
=== Laney changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: Bionic 18.04.4, Eoan 19.10 | Beta Communicator: bdmurray | Archive: Beta Freeze | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Focal Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or gin | melius malum quod cognoscis
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: opencryptoki (focal-proposed/universe) [3.13.0+dfsg-0ubuntu1 => 3.13.0+dfsg-0ubuntu3] (no packageset)18:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted opencryptoki [source] (focal-proposed) [3.13.0+dfsg-0ubuntu3]18:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (focal-proposed/main) [20.2.1~0ubuntu1 => 20.3] (core)18:10
paridexnox, the utah key works fine on focal apparently. that's not it.18:11
xnoxparide:  so, i think maybe you need to disable ECC keys in paramiko, asking it to ignore them / not use them.18:13
xnoxparide:  i thought i.e. something was done in launchpad to start supporting new key types or ignoring them. maybe grep through launchpad code to see things there?18:13
xnoxi think it uses paramiko too, and like had to upgrade it or something?18:13
xnox(in the git ssh code stuff)18:13
paridexnox, the EC bit is often misleading, see https://github.com/paramiko/paramiko/issues/521 https://github.com/paramiko/paramiko/issues/38718:23
gitbotparamiko issue 521 in paramiko "misleading exception: not a valid EC private key file" [Closed]18:23
gitbotparamiko issue 387 in paramiko "Key handling is terribad" [Bug, Exception Handling, High Priority, Keys, Open]18:23
parideand the key is a static key utah always reuses18:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: opencryptoki (focal-proposed/universe) [3.13.0+dfsg-0ubuntu3 => 3.13.0+dfsg-0ubuntu4] (no packageset)18:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted opencryptoki [source] (focal-proposed) [3.13.0+dfsg-0ubuntu4]18:33
RikMillsummm. how come my existing bileto PPA is build riscv64?18:52
RikMillscpaelzer sil2100 can I land that after beta in that state? as the riscv64 builds will obviously dep wait19:04
sil2100RikMills: yeah, as mentioned above, I tweaked bileto to only set architectures that the archive builds for but as per LP currently riscv64 seems to be enabled for the archive19:05
sil2100So oh well...19:06
RikMillsok. I guess briteny will shrug at the depwaits19:06
RikMillsseems an odd time to do this19:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: abiword (focal-proposed/universe) [3.0.2-9build2 => 3.0.2-10] (desktop-extra) (sync)19:13
LocutusOfBorgit seems to be not an odd time, because we are in freeze, so building the archive now is a good time to bootstrap an architecture...19:14
mwhudsonparide: did you get an answer about efibootmgr?19:14
LocutusOfBorgI'm interested in understanding why llvm-toolchain-10 is not showing risc64 builds...19:14
cpaelzersil2100: for now I do my bileto PPA builds overriding architecture in d/control to not build riscv19:47
cpaelzerthat way I can work around it until you had time to fix19:47
paridemwhudson, I guess it's my time to show up late :) rharper said running efibootmgr from the host is intentional and needed, as IIUC some efi files are not available in the target system (/sys/firmware/efi).19:48
mwhudsonparide: ok19:48
mwhudsonthe fix i landed in subiquity can stay then :)19:48
paridebut he was still surprised that it failed19:48
parideprobably expecting curtin to install in efibootmgr to the host system on its own? I'm not sure19:49
pariderharper, ^^19:49
sil2100cpaelzer: there's not much to fix sadly19:52
sil2100cpaelzer: I can blacklist it, but if the architecture is enabled for the target archive, this would basically make syncing less reliable19:53
sil2100cpaelzer: and it is19:53
cpaelzerat least our team never uses it for syncs19:53
cpaelzerand IIRC riscv isn't expected to always build fine19:53
cpaelzerso there might be some magic dust in the main archive that makes it work there to not consider a build fully broken if one arch is FTFBS19:54
cpaelzerbut in the PPAs that does not work yet19:54
cpaelzeruntil that happens I'd ask to disable it there (or allow us to disable it)19:54
cpaelzerotherwsie the bileto ppas that always were so handy for iterating on cross-arch autopkgests become mostly useless to us - which would be sad19:54
cpaelzeras discussed many times we don't use it to build and then publish from these PPAs, we use it if we need the real autopkgtest infrastructure to run across architectures19:56
cpaelzerand that use case is kind of broken if it never passes build state now due to riscv FTFBS19:56
cpaelzermaybe wgrant could outline how that will work in the actual archive19:57
cpaelzerif we upload package src:foo now and it FTFBS on riscv but otherwise works what happens then=19:57
cpaelzerI'd assume there must be a good share of FTFBS left and I can't imagine we further handicap (the already complex) late minute fixes by suddenly also all have to build fine on riscv19:58
cpaelzersil2100: lets wait what wgrant says and then consider replicating that in the bileto PPAs ok?19:58
sil2100cpaelzer: yeah, let's get feedback from wgrant and I can then look into getting that sorted out20:04
RikMillsso I abandon my landing ppa?20:08
sil2100hm, ok20:14
RikMillsback later20:17
sil2100I was considering maybe indeed temporarily give the option to disable arches, but then I noticed it might not be as easy20:18
sil2100I mean, from the LP POV, since the PPA UI was always graying out the riscv arch20:19
RikMillsmaybe I will just upload plasma 5.18.4 direct this time until things are clearer? that should work ok still?20:20
RikMillsor maybe see it will let me land it in the state of the riscv64 depwaiting?20:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-wallpapers (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.1-0ubuntu1 => 20.04.2-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core)21:01
sbeattiehi. The security team accidentally published a package to focal-security. (we were planning to have it sponsored into focal-proposed, but our documentation led our uploader astray.)21:24
sbeattieThe source package is libgd2.21:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libstdc++-arm-none-eabi (focal-proposed/universe) [12build1 => 12build2] (no packageset)21:24
sbeattieWhat's the best approach to get this resolved.21:24
sil2100sbeattie: ok, I think I'll do what Laney just suggested: I can copy it to -proposed for you and remove it from -security21:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libstdc++-arm-none-eabi [source] (focal-proposed) [12build2]21:24
sbeattiesil2100: that would be awesome, thank you!21:25
cjwatsonxnox: No, the LP work for this was to do with Twisted, not paramiko21:25
cjwatson(and remains not quite complete)21:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: auctex (focal-proposed/universe) [11.91-2ubuntu1 => 11.91-2ubuntu2] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)21:28
sil2100sbeattie: on it now o/21:28
sbeattiethanks again!21:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libgd2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.2.5-5.2ubuntu1 => 2.2.5-5.2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) (sync)21:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libgd2 [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.2.5-5.2ubuntu1]21:34
xnoxok thanks.21:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-settings (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04.2 => 20.04.3] (ubuntu-mate)21:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (focal-proposed/main) [156 => 158] (ubuntu-desktop)21:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ido (focal-proposed/universe) [13.10.0+17.04.20161028-0ubuntu1 => 13.10.0+17.04.20161028-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)21:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu [source] (focal-proposed) [158]22:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: initramfs-tools (focal-proposed/main) [0.136ubuntu2 => 0.136ubuntu3] (core, i386-whitelist)22:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (focal-proposed/main) [156 => 158] (ubuntu-desktop)22:26
bdmurrayThe respins are still taking a really long time and based on our estimates it will be a few more hours provided everything goes well.23:05
bdmurraySo if you are hanging around waiting to test the respun isos feel free to take a break for the evening / night - whatever it is where you are.23:07
bdmurrayThe release team will let you know when we have some news and isos to test.23:07
=== bdmurray changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: Bionic 18.04.4, Eoan 19.10 | Beta Communicator: None | Archive: Beta Freeze | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Focal Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or gin | melius malum quod cognoscis
amurrayhey AA's - I inadvertently published a security update for apport in focal yesterday to focal-security - I would be very grateful if someone could pocket copy it to the release pocket and delete it from focal-security23:52

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!