| spyfly | I'm experiencing some issues with the nvidia-440 driver on the 20.04 beta | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| exit70 | is it a good idea to test 20.04 using https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DebootstrapChroot | 00:01 |
| lotuspsychje | good morning | 03:38 |
| === masteroman_ is now known as masteroman | ||
| Groar | hi | 09:18 |
| Groar | anyone here? | 09:22 |
| Groar | Well, I'll ask my question and I'll wait till someone answers haha | 09:32 |
| Groar | I have holidays and nothing to do since Covid19 is in the air... well, now really, I live in Spain and cannot go outside. So I have nothing better to do than to enjoy my computer | 09:33 |
| Groar | so I've been thinking about upgrading from 18.04 to 22.04 | 09:33 |
| Groar | errr 20.04* | 09:33 |
| Groar | In case I did it, when Ubuntu 20.04 (final) was released, would I have to reinstall it again or it wouldn't be needed at all? | 09:34 |
| jatt | you won't need to reinstall, you can just upgrade and you will get the final version | 09:38 |
| Groar | jatt: are you under it? is it working fine? | 09:45 |
| === Groar is now known as Groar_ | ||
| === Groar_ is now known as Groar | ||
| jatt | yes I upgraded yesterday, xrdp and openssh didn't work properly afterwards but I could fix the problems by installing an older version of those packages | 09:46 |
| jatt | other than that it's very much stable | 09:46 |
| Groar | I'll install it on Wednesday since the kernel will be freezing by that day | 09:47 |
| Groar | :) | 09:47 |
| jatt | good | 09:47 |
| lotuspsychje | Groar: just keep in mind the LTS upgrade way is waiting until 20.04.1 point release comes out around august | 10:06 |
| Groar | lotuspsychje: Yeah I knew that fact :) | 10:13 |
| lotuspsychje | cool, the users choice then :p | 10:13 |
| spyfly | I am experiencing some issues with the gui scaling. I am trying to set the scaling to 200% on a triple monitor setup with xorg using the proprietary nvidia-440 driver, but the screens will just go blank and revert back to 100% | 12:41 |
| diddledan | ello, anyone know anything about zfs setup for 20.04? my /boot is seemingly devoid of storage capacity - zfs list shows the active set (snapshot?) as using 1.13G while du -sh /boot shows ~300MB.. I need to figure out how to reduce its usage so I can finish installing updates (mkinitramfs dies because there isn't enough storage space on /boot for | 15:09 |
| diddledan | the initrd).. | 15:09 |
| diddledan | here's some info I managed to gather: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/MVfHnqzbzf/ | 15:13 |
| diddledan | I'm presuming I've somehow got a borked system and need to reinstall....? (it is beta, after all :-) | 15:14 |
| howarth | Is Gnome Weather working in the Ubuntu Message Tray for anyone as described in https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2020/04/see-world-clock-and-weather-info-ubuntu | 15:22 |
| howarth | I am seeing 'Weather Select a location' which is I click brings up the Gnome Weather app that automatically detects my location. | 15:23 |
| howarth | However when I click on the tray a second time, it is still showing 'Weather Select a location' instead of the five day report. | 15:24 |
| howarth | Ah, the comments in the article suggest that it doesn't seem to work well with automatic location detection | 15:25 |
| dh-tech | Hi folks, i am testing Ubuntu 20.04, before reporting a bug i want to make sure i am right, i have the all dark theme setup, but i noticed notification drop down, settings drop down and the authentication popup are white and not using the dark theme. | 15:25 |
| dh-tech | is that expected | 15:25 |
| howarth | Figured it out, turns out that I didn't have location detection services turned on, which is odd because the app itself still did detect location without that | 15:26 |
| dh-tech | Sorry to repeat my question, i am testing Ubuntu 20.04, before reporting a bug i want to make sure i am right, i have the all dark theme setup, but i noticed notification drop down, settings drop down and the authentication popup are white and not using the dark theme. | 15:42 |
| cowpig | Hello! I've had a problem with iwlwifi since installing 20.04 on my new laptop, about 3 weeks ago. Have asked about it here a few times but nobody's been able to figure it out. Here are some details on the problem: | 15:44 |
| cowpig | https://askubuntu.com/questions/1224353/intel-wifi-driver-problems-in-ubuntu-20-04-development-branch?noredirect=1#comment2058973_1224353 | 15:44 |
| cowpig | I want to report it to the right place but the instructions on reporting a bug seem to require a package: | 15:45 |
| cowpig | https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs | 15:45 |
| cowpig | My problem is the driver, not the package, I think. So I don't know how I'm supposed to report this | 15:45 |
| cowpig | should I report the problem on `ping` ?? | 15:46 |
| Groar | one question. Does ubuntu 20.04 use xorg by default as previous versions? | 15:46 |
| Groar | or has it changed already? | 15:46 |
| dh-tech | My install used X11 by default, but i upgraded from 19.10 to 20.04 not a fresh install | 15:47 |
| Groar | dh-tech: is xorg better than the new one? | 15:48 |
| dh-tech | in my opinion Wayland still need a lot of improvements, but you always have the option to switch on the login screen | 15:51 |
| diddledan | cowpig: run `dpkg -l |grep iwlwifi` if that returns `backport-iwlwifi-dkms` then you can run `ubuntu-bug backport-iwlwifi-dkms` to file the bug report semi-automatically. | 15:51 |
| cowpig | @diddledan it doesn't :( | 15:53 |
| diddledan | in that case then, try `ubuntu-bug linux-modules-extra-$(uname -r)` | 15:54 |
| diddledan | it looks like iwlwifi is in that second one if you haven't got the backport installed, so that should get you to the correct file bug page | 15:56 |
| cowpig | I got disconnected but submitted the bug report as you suggested diddledan | 16:07 |
| cowpig | would be nice if the bug report page had an explanation of how to figure out which package you should report to in https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs | 16:08 |
| luna_ | trying to change from Alpha to Beta now | 17:03 |
| luna_ | worked good | 17:05 |
| howarth | Has anyone else noticed the following bug in the installer? On my 2008 MacPro, I prefer to Ubuntu 20.04 install its /boot/efi mount on the EFI partition of the physical linux disk. I tried using the Custom Partitioning option to select that device (/dev/sde) as the device for the boot loader installation. What actually happened was quite weird. The boot loader still got installed on the EFI partition of the macOS drive and worse the E | 19:01 |
| howarth | I partition on /dev/sde got recreated with the identical blkid of that of the EFI partition of the macOS drive. | 19:01 |
| howarth | So that I had two different devices with identical blkid's for their EFI partitions. Not good. | 19:02 |
| OmegaRidley | I'm trying the 20.04 beta image from Friday, and after I install the ubuntu-restricted-extras package, I can't login back from the login screen anymore. After I confirm the password, it tries to login, but goes back to the login screen. I could confirm that it starts happening after I install that package. Anyone knows if that is a known issue | 19:06 |
| OmegaRidley | already? | 19:06 |
| luna_ | sent some more suggestions for translations in the ubuntu-wallpaper-2004 package | 19:08 |
| howarth | Hard to see why anything in ubuntu-restricted-extras would impact logins | 19:17 |
| howarth | It just appears to be a metapackage to install unrar, ttf-mscorefonts and restricted audio codecs | 19:18 |
| billythekid123 | hi there! | 19:27 |
| billythekid123 | I just upgraded from 19.10 to 20.04 beta. I checked the installed snaps and noticed that both gnome-3-28-1804 and gnome-3-34-1804 are installed so I tried to remove the 3.28. After doing that all snaps stopped working. Reinstalling it makes everything work. Any idea what this is? | 19:27 |
| howarth | The execution of the scripts in 'do-release-upgrade -d' seemed to do a dependency check on the snaps so it probably is a real dependency on some that haven't been fully updated to the newer gnome. | 19:35 |
| billythekid123 | howarth that's my understanding as well. I tried doing something like: | 19:37 |
| billythekid123 | $ snap connect firefox:gnome-3-34-1804 gnome-3-34-1804error: snap "firefox" has no plug named "gnome-3-34-1804" | 19:37 |
| billythekid123 | so probably most snaps need to connect to the 3-34? right? | 19:37 |
| billythekid123 | it's weird though because the beta comes with only gnome-3-34-1804 installed, so it should be working | 19:38 |
| billythekid123 | oh yes that's it... I have a VM and I just fired Ubuntu beta. Installing firefox installs also gnome-3-34-1804. | 19:41 |
| howarth | Things can lag. I just noticed that gnome-photos is still based on the 3.34 code base | 19:42 |
| billythekid123 | sorry I meant gnome-3-28-1804 | 19:42 |
| billythekid123 | one of the snaps actually works with only 3.34 on but firefox and Thunderbird require 3.34 | 19:43 |
| billythekid123 | and they install it if it's missing on a fresh install | 19:43 |
| howarth | And a big feature with Gnome 3.36 was supposed to be the replacement of Shotwell with Gnome Photos | 19:43 |
| billythekid123 | you think it's worth reporting this over snapcraft or you think it's certain they are on to it? | 19:43 |
| howarth | Evolution is supposed to be replaced by Geary and Gnome calendar. Likewise Rhythm Box is supposed to be replaced by Gnome Music. https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2020/02/gnome-3-36-features | 19:45 |
| billythekid123 | haha yeah I read it :D | 19:45 |
| billythekid123 | yeap 100% confirmed. some snaps depend on the previous gnome snaps and when you install them they install also previous versions of gnome. Removing the old gnome snap makes the snap unbootable. | 19:47 |
| billythekid123 | if you install it again, everything works. Cool, thanks for the help/info howarth. I'll be patient then :) | 19:48 |
| BobParr | Hi all - looking to get some help for an issue. I fresh-installed MATE 20.04 and after trying to get some DVD's to play, I get "error:0 in libdvdnav.so.4.2.0" in syslog. I'm not sure where I start in troubleshooting this | 23:00 |
| BobParr | It was working after the fresh install in VLC, but some add-on I did must have messed it up | 23:01 |
| valorie | libdvd is part of a library name | 23:02 |
| Bashing-om | BobParr: What shows ' dpkg -l libdvd-pkg ' ? | 23:02 |
| BobParr | Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)||/ Name Version Architecture Description+++-==============-============-============-=====================================ii libdvd-pkg 1.4.2-1-1 all | 23:02 |
| BobParr | DVD-Video playing library - installer | 23:02 |
| BobParr | That didn't paste very nicely | 23:03 |
| Bashing-om | !paste | BobParr | 23:03 |
| ubottu | BobParr: For posting multi-line texts into the channel, please use https://paste.ubuntu.com | To post !screenshots use https://imgur.com/ !pastebinit to paste directly from command line | Make sure you give us the URL for your paste - see also the channel topic. | 23:03 |
| BobParr | https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/7xHkRjqQ7J/ | 23:04 |
| Bashing-om | BobParr: Your paste does not load - check for typo, please. | 23:05 |
| BobParr | It was a copy paste ... Let's try again https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/7xHkRjqQ7J/ | 23:06 |
| BobParr | Link works for me... | 23:06 |
| BobParr | !pastebinit Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)||/ Name Version Architecture Description+++-==============-============-============-=====================================ii libdvd-pkg | 23:07 |
| BobParr | 1.4.2-1-1 all DVD-Video playing library - installer | 23:07 |
| BobParr | dangit, sorry | 23:07 |
| Bashing-om | BobParr: A problem here with my seconday browser - works in my primary. Any way the lib is installed. Was my only thought. | 23:08 |
| BobParr | Should I purge it and reinstall? apt install --reinstall libdvd-pkg didn't fix anything | 23:10 |
| oerheks | lib dvd needs 2 steps to work, right? | 23:10 |
| oerheks | sudo apt install libdvd-pkg && sudo dpkg-reconfigure libdvd-pkg | 23:10 |
| BobParr | $ sudo dpkg-reconfigure libdvd-pkglibdvd-pkg: guest package [libdvdcss2/1.4.2-1~local] is already installed. | 23:10 |
| BobParr | $ sudo dpkg-reconfigure libdvd-pkg | 23:11 |
| BobParr | libdvd-pkg: guest package [libdvdcss2/1.4.2-1~local] is already installed. | 23:11 |
| Bashing-om | oerheks: BobParr : +1 ^ | 23:11 |
| oerheks | well, remove vlc and addon you messed up | 23:11 |
| BobParr | What's the best way to do that? apt purge? | 23:11 |
| Bashing-om | !info libdvd-pkg | 23:12 |
| ubottu | libdvd-pkg (source: libdvd-pkg): DVD-Video playing library - installer. In component multiverse, is optional. Version 1.4.2-1-1 (focal), package size 14 kB, installed size 79 kB | 23:12 |
| oerheks | and remove cruft in ~/.config and ~/.cache too, VLC | 23:13 |
| BobParr | so use apt purge to do it? | 23:13 |
| oerheks | yes. | 23:14 |
| BobParr | I purged vlc, deleted the folders in ~/.cache and ~/.config and then reinstalled. Same error. Next step would be to purge libdvdnav4? It seems to remove a lot after that | 23:16 |
| BobParr | The following packages will be REMOVED: celluloid* handbrake* libdvdnav4* libmpv1* mpv* vlc* vlc-plugin-base* | 23:16 |
| BobParr | Seems to only be an issue with DVDs, as BluRay plays fine | 23:19 |
| BobParr | bah - I purged libdvdnav4, which removed VLC. Then I reinstalled VLC (which came with libdvdnav4) and still get the same error | 23:26 |
| BobParr | kernel: [ 2273.937646] traps: vlc[7593] general protection fault ip:7f3ac6eb9d74 sp:7f3a8a77deb0 error:0 in libdvdnav.so.4.2.0[7f3ac6eb0000+d000] | 23:26 |
| oerheks | file a bugreport, perhaps? i find no recent ones | 23:39 |
| BobParr | ok. I'll have to do that. Thanks! | 23:40 |
| BobParr | I used the snap version and it works... so I guess I'll stick with that :P | 23:47 |
| === lestac_afk is now known as lestac | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!