[08:11] <lubot> <mitya57> And now it's finally available!
[08:12] <lubot> <RikMills> \o/
[08:13] <lubot> <mitya57> I will start working on it in 15 minutes :)
[08:25] <lubot> <mitya57> But https://download.qt.io/official_releases/qt/5.12/5.12.8/submodules/ is empty :(
[08:33] <lubot> <X> Release script bug or releases are not public anymore?
[08:33] <lubot> <mitya57> Not finished yet, I think.
[08:39] <RikMills>  /o\
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qt5-ukui-platformtheme (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1 => 1.0.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: accepted qt5-ukui-platformtheme [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.3-0ubuntu1]
[14:49] <lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 [Not finished yet, I think.], :(
[15:04] <lubot> <mitya57> Also I wonder why there is no release meeting. There should have been one an hour ago.
[15:47] <lubot> <mitya57> Hmm, salsa search_project python-team/modules is working > 1 minute and prints nothing :(
[15:47] <lubot> <mitya57> Do you remember how long it was taking for qt-kde-team/qt?
[15:52] <lubot> <RikMills> Not sure I am searching in the same place, but result seem immediate here
[15:53] <lubot> <mitya57> --verbose please, what do you mean?
[15:54] <lubot> <mitya57> Oh, I am really sorry, I sent the above to wrong Telegram chat :(
[16:01] <lubot> * RikMills asked
[16:01] <lubot> <mitya57> I have just noticed that channel's topic…
=== mitya57_ is now known as mitya57
[16:03] <lubot> <RikMills> gah!
[16:03] <lubot> <mitya57> At least someone created 5.12.8 directory today, so I assumed there is some release script in progress.
[16:05] <lubot> <RikMills> This things don't always complete smoothly, and if people are AWOL for the meeting they might not also be babysitting such a script
[16:06] <lubot> <mitya57> Let's wait for jaheikki3's reply
[16:06] <lubot> <mitya57> In the worst case we can fall back to 5.12.7
[16:07] <lubot> <RikMills> @RikMills [These things don't always complete smoothly, and if people are AWOL for the meet …], Or it is now on QtWebEngine 🤣
[16:07] <lubot> <mitya57> That is quite likely :)
[16:08] <lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 [In the worst case we can fall back to 5.12.7], Yeah, I almost asked if there might be benefit starting on that
[16:08] <lubot> <mitya57> Not much benefit. The ABI package name will be different so we would have to re-bootstrap docs for 5.12.8 anyway.
[16:09] <lubot> <RikMills> Worth waiting to see then.
[16:11] <lubot> <mitya57> On codereview there are no changes for 5.12.8 since April 2nd. So the needed automated testing has already happened, and I hope manual testing too.