/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/04/11/#lubuntu-devel.txt

lubot<The_LoudSpeaker> @wxl [<wxl> stolen from https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/variants-of-logos-for-flavours/ …], Can we ask the op to send a better picture? We can use it for sddm.01:15
guivercI just noticed https://discourse.lubuntu.me/t/partitioning-error-in-installer/917 , I still regularly get https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/1851188 as others do I note, yet it's marked 'fix released'.  should we create a new bug, or re-open 18511885?01:17
ubot93Launchpad bug 1851188 in calamares (Ubuntu) "Failed to create a partition table - install failed" [Critical, Fix Released]01:17
lubot<The_LoudSpeaker> I didn't face it when I did a Lubuntu install in a vm that already had 20.04 in it. I too used erase disk option.01:19
lubot<The_LoudSpeaker> Is it specific to installs where 19.10 is already there?01:19
guivercno; it appears specific to specific few machines.. some machines reliably get it, most do not.01:21
lubot<The_LoudSpeaker> Okay. I also didn't get the replace option mentioned there which intrigued me, I got only the option of erase disk and manual partitioning. Earlier install was just an efi partition and then whole system in one btrfs partition.01:22
lubot<The_LoudSpeaker> Is it normal to not get that replace option?01:23
lubot<The_LoudSpeaker> I forgot to ask that day.01:23
lubot<The_LoudSpeaker> I think it is not.01:23
guivercSorry The_LoudSpeaker I can't help with replace appearing, I forget what Walter or Dan have told me..01:23
lubot<The_LoudSpeaker> @wxl: wake up! It is 7 am.01:24
lubot<The_LoudSpeaker> :P01:24
guivercIt's still Good Friday for Walter & many of our team !01:25
lubot<The_LoudSpeaker> Yeah. I know.01:26
lubot<The_LoudSpeaker> But I am still gonna poke wxl: to wake up!01:26
* guiverc just updated iso, and re-did qa-test install on my 755 that gets 1851188 regularly; no issues today! (last ~4 full disk installs died with it)01:46
wxlwho awakens me17:09
kc2bezwxl: I didn't wake you but I do need some guidance with https://phab.lubuntu.me/D8817:37
-lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Needs Review] Add wallpapers from wallpaper contest.: https://phab.lubuntu.me/D8817:37
wxlfirst is anyone seeing this on phab? 17:53
wxlUnhandled Exception ("Exception")17:53
wxlHMAC-SHA256 can only digest strings.17:53
kc2bezYes, i got the same.17:54
kc2bezThat is why I was concerned17:54
wxlweird17:54
wxlit's specific to that thing17:54
kc2bezYeah, either I borked my upload or phab doesn't like me.17:55
kc2bezi wasn't sure17:55
wxlhttps://discourse.phabricator-community.org/t/invalid-all-files-fail-with-hmac-sha256-can-only-digest-strings/3081/317:56
wxl@teward001 is that something you can look into? ^^17:56
-queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Unapproved: libfm-qt (focal-proposed/universe) [0.14.1-12ubuntu2 => 0.14.1-12ubuntu3] (lubuntu) (sync)18:08
-queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Unapproved: libqtxdg (focal-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1build1 => 3.4.0-1build2] (lubuntu) (sync)18:08
-queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Unapproved: lxqt-qtplugin (focal-proposed/universe) [0.14.0-3ubuntu3 => 0.14.0-3ubuntu4] (lubuntu) (sync)18:08
lubot<RikMills> Qt 5.12.8 is landing19:08
wxl!info util-linux19:14
ubot93util-linux (2.34-0.1ubuntu9, focal): miscellaneous system utilities. In component main, is required. Built by util-linux. Size 997 kB / 4,538 kB19:14
wxloh ho19:14
wxlso rearding the random weird issues some people have had and some people have not had with installs, i'm thinking we may need to get a newer util-linux https://github.com/karelzak/util-linux/commit/ac762ed71f982468f4c83291158e97cf86281beb19:21
wxler well, that patch :/19:24
wxl2.35.1 was released upstream 31 jan and doesn't include that yet19:25
wxlsighhhhhhh i guess we should test that theory by packaging git master and throwing it into a ppa siiiiighh19:26
wxlcontext here https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/133419:26
ubot93Issue 1334 in calamares/calamares "failed install with manual partitioning & existing scheme" [Open]19:26
=== hggdh is now known as hggdh-msft
lubot<tsimonq2> @lynorian Did you get a chance to make any progress on the Lubuntu Manual snap?21:02
lubot<tsimonq2> @teward001 If we indeed go through with making the manual a default part of the installation, we might want to consider putting that through a CDN to make sure that our infrastructure doesn't get slammed hard21:03
lubot<wxl23> @tsimonq2 [@teward001 If we indeed go through with making the manual a default part of the …], Why would our resources need to be involved?21:06
lubot<tsimonq2> @wxl23 [Why would our resources need to be involved?], Much more visibility, in the same way that the main site has its own server21:08
lubot<tsimonq2> Lubuntu.me and manual.l.m should probably both be under a CDN all the time21:08
lubot<tsimonq2> Counterarguments welcome though :)21:09
kc2bezDoes the proposed snap idea not take care of that? 21:09
lubot<tsimonq2> It takes care of the problem to a degree but the site will still get visibility because it's "shipped by default" and people may want to view it to see if it's good21:10
lubot<tsimonq2> It does sound counter-intuitive but it'll be a highlight21:11
kc2bezOk , I understand your concern.21:11
lubot<wxl23> But isn't that what having the Snap installed is for?21:11
lubot<wxl23> I mean I generally agree with CDN tho21:11
lubot<tsimonq2> @wxl23 [But isn't that what having the Snap installed is for?], Yes and no21:12

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!