 @wxl [<wxl> stolen from https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/variants-of-logos-for-flavours/ …], Can we ask the op to send a better picture? We can use it for sddm.
[01:17] <guiverc> I just noticed https://discourse.lubuntu.me/t/partitioning-error-in-installer/917 , I still regularly get https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/1851188 as others do I note, yet it's marked 'fix released'.  should we create a new bug, or re-open 18511885?
 I didn't face it when I did a Lubuntu install in a vm that already had 20.04 in it. I too used erase disk option.
 Is it specific to installs where 19.10 is already there?
[01:21] <guiverc> no; it appears specific to specific few machines.. some machines reliably get it, most do not.
 Okay. I also didn't get the replace option mentioned there which intrigued me, I got only the option of erase disk and manual partitioning. Earlier install was just an efi partition and then whole system in one btrfs partition.
 Is it normal to not get that replace option?
 I forgot to ask that day.
 I think it is not.
[01:23] <guiverc> Sorry The_LoudSpeaker I can't help with replace appearing, I forget what Walter or Dan have told me..
 @wxl: wake up! It is 7 am.
 :P
[01:25] <guiverc> It's still Good Friday for Walter & many of our team !
 Yeah. I know.
 But I am still gonna poke wxl: to wake up!
[01:46]  * guiverc just updated iso, and re-did qa-test install on my 755 that gets 1851188 regularly; no issues today!  (last ~4 full disk installs died with it)
[17:09] <wxl> who awakens me
[17:37] <kc2bez> wxl: I didn't wake you but I do need some guidance with https://phab.lubuntu.me/D88
[17:37] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Needs Review] Add wallpapers from wallpaper contest.: https://phab.lubuntu.me/D88
[17:53] <wxl> first is anyone seeing this on phab? 
[17:53] <wxl> Unhandled Exception ("Exception")
[17:53] <wxl> HMAC-SHA256 can only digest strings.
[17:54] <kc2bez> Yes, i got the same.
[17:54] <kc2bez> That is why I was concerned
[17:54] <wxl> weird
[17:54] <wxl> it's specific to that thing
[17:55] <kc2bez> Yeah, either I borked my upload or phab doesn't like me.
[17:55] <kc2bez> i wasn't sure
[17:56] <wxl> https://discourse.phabricator-community.org/t/invalid-all-files-fail-with-hmac-sha256-can-only-digest-strings/3081/3
[17:56] <wxl> @teward001 is that something you can look into? ^^
[18:08] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Unapproved: libfm-qt (focal-proposed/universe) [0.14.1-12ubuntu2 => 0.14.1-12ubuntu3] (lubuntu) (sync)
[18:08] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Unapproved: libqtxdg (focal-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1build1 => 3.4.0-1build2] (lubuntu) (sync)
[18:08] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Unapproved: lxqt-qtplugin (focal-proposed/universe) [0.14.0-3ubuntu3 => 0.14.0-3ubuntu4] (lubuntu) (sync)
 Qt 5.12.8 is landing
[19:14] <wxl> !info util-linux
[19:14] <wxl> oh ho
[19:21] <wxl> so rearding the random weird issues some people have had and some people have not had with installs, i'm thinking we may need to get a newer util-linux https://github.com/karelzak/util-linux/commit/ac762ed71f982468f4c83291158e97cf86281beb
[19:24] <wxl> er well, that patch :/
[19:25] <wxl> 2.35.1 was released upstream 31 jan and doesn't include that yet
[19:26] <wxl> sighhhhhhh i guess we should test that theory by packaging git master and throwing it into a ppa siiiiighh
[19:26] <wxl> context here https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1334
 @lynorian Did you get a chance to make any progress on the Lubuntu Manual snap?
 @teward001 If we indeed go through with making the manual a default part of the installation, we might want to consider putting that through a CDN to make sure that our infrastructure doesn't get slammed hard
 @tsimonq2 [@teward001 If we indeed go through with making the manual a default part of the …], Why would our resources need to be involved?
 @wxl23 [Why would our resources need to be involved?], Much more visibility, in the same way that the main site has its own server
 Lubuntu.me and manual.l.m should probably both be under a CDN all the time
 Counterarguments welcome though :)
[21:09] <kc2bez> Does the proposed snap idea not take care of that? 
 It takes care of the problem to a degree but the site will still get visibility because it's "shipped by default" and people may want to view it to see if it's good
 It does sound counter-intuitive but it'll be a highlight
[21:11] <kc2bez> Ok , I understand your concern.
 But isn't that what having the Snap installed is for?
 I mean I generally agree with CDN tho
 @wxl23 [But isn't that what having the Snap installed is for?], Yes and no