[01:15] @wxl [ stolen from https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/variants-of-logos-for-flavours/ …], Can we ask the op to send a better picture? We can use it for sddm. [01:17] I just noticed https://discourse.lubuntu.me/t/partitioning-error-in-installer/917 , I still regularly get https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/1851188 as others do I note, yet it's marked 'fix released'. should we create a new bug, or re-open 18511885? [01:17] Launchpad bug 1851188 in calamares (Ubuntu) "Failed to create a partition table - install failed" [Critical, Fix Released] [01:19] I didn't face it when I did a Lubuntu install in a vm that already had 20.04 in it. I too used erase disk option. [01:19] Is it specific to installs where 19.10 is already there? [01:21] no; it appears specific to specific few machines.. some machines reliably get it, most do not. [01:22] Okay. I also didn't get the replace option mentioned there which intrigued me, I got only the option of erase disk and manual partitioning. Earlier install was just an efi partition and then whole system in one btrfs partition. [01:23] Is it normal to not get that replace option? [01:23] I forgot to ask that day. [01:23] I think it is not. [01:23] Sorry The_LoudSpeaker I can't help with replace appearing, I forget what Walter or Dan have told me.. [01:24] @wxl: wake up! It is 7 am. [01:24] :P [01:25] It's still Good Friday for Walter & many of our team ! [01:26] Yeah. I know. [01:26] But I am still gonna poke wxl: to wake up! [01:46] * guiverc just updated iso, and re-did qa-test install on my 755 that gets 1851188 regularly; no issues today! (last ~4 full disk installs died with it) [17:09] who awakens me [17:37] wxl: I didn't wake you but I do need some guidance with https://phab.lubuntu.me/D88 [17:37] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Needs Review] Add wallpapers from wallpaper contest.: https://phab.lubuntu.me/D88 [17:53] first is anyone seeing this on phab? [17:53] Unhandled Exception ("Exception") [17:53] HMAC-SHA256 can only digest strings. [17:54] Yes, i got the same. [17:54] That is why I was concerned [17:54] weird [17:54] it's specific to that thing [17:55] Yeah, either I borked my upload or phab doesn't like me. [17:55] i wasn't sure [17:56] https://discourse.phabricator-community.org/t/invalid-all-files-fail-with-hmac-sha256-can-only-digest-strings/3081/3 [17:56] @teward001 is that something you can look into? ^^ [18:08] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Unapproved: libfm-qt (focal-proposed/universe) [0.14.1-12ubuntu2 => 0.14.1-12ubuntu3] (lubuntu) (sync) [18:08] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Unapproved: libqtxdg (focal-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1build1 => 3.4.0-1build2] (lubuntu) (sync) [18:08] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Unapproved: lxqt-qtplugin (focal-proposed/universe) [0.14.0-3ubuntu3 => 0.14.0-3ubuntu4] (lubuntu) (sync) [19:08] Qt 5.12.8 is landing [19:14] !info util-linux [19:14] util-linux (2.34-0.1ubuntu9, focal): miscellaneous system utilities. In component main, is required. Built by util-linux. Size 997 kB / 4,538 kB [19:14] oh ho [19:21] so rearding the random weird issues some people have had and some people have not had with installs, i'm thinking we may need to get a newer util-linux https://github.com/karelzak/util-linux/commit/ac762ed71f982468f4c83291158e97cf86281beb [19:24] er well, that patch :/ [19:25] 2.35.1 was released upstream 31 jan and doesn't include that yet [19:26] sighhhhhhh i guess we should test that theory by packaging git master and throwing it into a ppa siiiiighh [19:26] context here https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1334 [19:26] Issue 1334 in calamares/calamares "failed install with manual partitioning & existing scheme" [Open] === hggdh is now known as hggdh-msft [21:02] @lynorian Did you get a chance to make any progress on the Lubuntu Manual snap? [21:03] @teward001 If we indeed go through with making the manual a default part of the installation, we might want to consider putting that through a CDN to make sure that our infrastructure doesn't get slammed hard [21:06] @tsimonq2 [@teward001 If we indeed go through with making the manual a default part of the …], Why would our resources need to be involved? [21:08] @wxl23 [Why would our resources need to be involved?], Much more visibility, in the same way that the main site has its own server [21:08] Lubuntu.me and manual.l.m should probably both be under a CDN all the time [21:09] Counterarguments welcome though :) [21:09] Does the proposed snap idea not take care of that? [21:10] It takes care of the problem to a degree but the site will still get visibility because it's "shipped by default" and people may want to view it to see if it's good [21:11] It does sound counter-intuitive but it'll be a highlight [21:11] Ok , I understand your concern. [21:11] But isn't that what having the Snap installed is for? [21:11] I mean I generally agree with CDN tho [21:12] @wxl23 [But isn't that what having the Snap installed is for?], Yes and no