[00:33] Hmm... how do I set the language to Portuguese on Live Server install? [00:43] when i read live server install, i wonder what the difference would be vs regular server install [00:48] The interface is different. Prettier, but has very few language options... [00:56] I hope changing the language after install is easy [02:38] After installing language-pack-pt and edit /etc/default/locale (the best was to write locale output to /etc/default/locale and then replacing all "C." instances with "pt_BR.") [06:42] hey TJ- [06:42] KjetilK: not so far as I know but have you spotted something? [06:42] lotuspsychje: g'morning ... boy it's nice to have 10 hours sleep! Been doing 16+ hour days the last 2 weeks [06:43] nice [06:43] trouble is sleep makes me tired :P [06:44] yeah i got the same [06:44] too long: zombie mode [07:50] morning Dr8g0n [08:29] Hey lotuspsychje - morning [08:29] any progress on your gestures bug? [08:30] lotuspsychje - none at all I have the impression. Not a single reaction. [08:30] But have not been able to monitor it yesterday in U-Q had to reboot and only logged back into the channel now [08:31] I do have another bug... [08:32] I notice that the first animation when hitting Super-A is missing [08:33] In other words: coming from any which other application, hit Super-A. The applications appear but without that (lovely) animation. [08:33] Hit Super-A again: the applications hide themselves WITH animation [08:34] Hit it a third time: they appear WITH animation [08:34] Fourth: disappear with animation [08:34] Switch to other application [08:34] Hit super-A again: appear WITHOUT animation [08:34] Entirely reproducible [08:35] Is this known? [08:55] lotuspsychje - filed another report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1872177 [08:55] Launchpad bug 1872177 in gnome-shell (Ubuntu) "Launcher animation initially does NOT work (20.04-X Server)" [Undecided,New] [13:23] welcome SirMcLouis [13:23] thanks lotuspsychje [13:23] what can we do for you [13:23] I can share screen… seems that is a bug [13:23] anyway to fix? [13:24] can or cant? [13:24] can't (sorry) [13:24] think ive seen a bug on that recently holdon [13:25] someone else reported that recently [13:25] I've seen something on ask ubuntu [13:26] but it was dismissed since it isn't the current version [13:27] https://askubuntu.com/questions/1225832/cannot-enable-screen-sharing-on-ubuntu-20-04 [13:27] bug #1871787 [13:27] bug 1871787 in gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) "Screen sharing can not be enabled from the Gnome Control Center" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1871787 [13:27] here SirMcLouis [13:28] is there any way enable it on terminal? [13:28] SirMcLouis: test the bug case, and if its you, please affect yourself on left upper corner [13:29] see also the bug sebastien linked to [13:30] thanks! [13:30] welcome and tnx yourself to report it [14:31] apt-cacher-ng is returning : Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/focal/main/cnf/Commands-amd64 403 Forbidden file type or location, what type of file pattern is likely to be missing? [14:32] in the acng config file? [14:34] in my settings PfilePattern = .(.d?deb|.db|.rpm|.drpm|.dsc|.tar(.gz|.bz2|.lzma|.xz|.zst)(.gpg)?|.diff(.gz|.bz2|.lzma|.zst|.xz)|.jigdo|.template|changelog|copyright|.udeb|.debdelta|.diff/..gz|(Devel)?ReleaseAnnouncement(\?.)?|[a-f0-9]+-(susedata|updateinfo|primary|deltainfo).xml.gz|fonts/(final/)?[a-z]+32.exe(\?download.)?|/dists/./installer-[^/]+/[0-9][^/]+/images/.)$ [14:49] on sudo apt update [14:53] regarding the previous bug about the screen sharing… is there any way using terminal to toggle that option? [14:54] SirMcLouis: the bug is not yet solved, as the problem is probably vino is not included, and screensharing wants to point to there [14:54] I can access vino on /usr/lib/vino/vino-server [14:54] SirMcLouis: think we can only await in this stage [14:54] (Y) [14:54] OK! [14:55] 👍 [14:55] SirMcLouis: another idea is sharing this bug to #ubuntu-quality where devs & testers meet [14:55] SirMcLouis: maybe it can fasten the solving [14:55] I don' t know why by during this time I've lost the ability to show all the open windows pushing the win button [14:56] works here SirMcLouis [14:57] I believe you [14:57] how is that screen called? [14:59] sorry… I had the wrong language layout [14:59] :P [15:53] libgcc-s1 was renamed in Focal. Anyone know what it was called before? [15:56] lib name changes seem particularly hard to track because for changelogs and bug reports this is just part of the gcc-10 package [15:57] I guess it's one of those things where breakage will be reported as needed [15:57] not sure, but libgcc_s perhaps? [15:59] !info libgcc1 [15:59] libgcc1 (source: gcc-10 (10-20200405-0ubuntu1)): GCC support library (dependency package). In component universe, is required. Version 1:10-20200405-0ubuntu1 (focal), package size 40 kB, installed size 120 kB [16:03] comparing https://packages.ubuntu.com/eoan/libgcc1 to https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/libgcc1 suggests that, starting with focal, libgcc1 was moved to universe and the separate libgcc-s1 package (which libgcc1 depends on) was created also in universe. [16:07] the focal package changelog for gcc-10 (note eoan ships gcc-9, not -10) may explain why this was done (i don't claim to understand) [16:07] Kon: ^ [16:18] Yeah that changelog is above my paygrade [16:19] Very interesting that gcc-10 moved into universe [16:19] debian's bug tracker may have more insight. [16:20] maybe it's just too early a snapshot to provide official support for it in the soon to be 20.04 release [16:21] (after all, gcc 10 is not released, yet) [16:22] focal's default gcc version continues to be gcc-9 https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/gcc (but libgcc-s1 is part of gcc-10) [16:27] Ahh, that's probably it [17:16] Hi, does anyone know if the .profile should be read when I establish Xorg session via RDP? Ubuntu Mate 20.04 with xrdp installed. [17:17] I am missing my ~/bin directory in path when i connect via RDP so I am not sure if this is a bug or not. [17:42] I'm having issues with the graphical installer. It seems super-desparate to tell me about how it's going to create "Primary" and "Logical" partitions despite booting into EFI mode Also, it seems super-desparate to tell me that it's going to format a swap partition located on a completely different hard drive that I would prefer the installer not even touch [17:42] I can't install Ubuntu without this issue being addressed I don't think. [18:14] AlexMax: sounds strange since swap moved to be a swapfile not a partition [18:14] Oh, I'm doing the partitions myself. [18:14] In the official installer [18:14] So i create my own swap partition [18:14] But for some reason, it also wants to format the swap partition on the other hard drive. [18:16] AlexMax: there's an existing swap partition ? [18:17] Yes. I have two hard drives. One of them has an existing Fedora installation. The other has some.....well, doesn't matter, I want to torch it all and put Ubuntu on it. [18:17] AlexMax: just don't define a swap at all [18:18] AlexMax: does the installer still, then, try to grab the existing swap partition? [18:18] Haven't tried. [18:18] Currentyl in the middle of something, but I'll check in a bit. [18:19] I do quite complex 'Something else' schemes and not had a problem so far in the way you describe [18:19] I've just noticed it automatically added the /swapfile here too, so that is done anyhow I guess === hggdh is now known as hggdh-msft