teward | wxl @wxl23 so they've reproduced it when a file is deleted from the S3 store - my guess is the backend provided by DO deleted the file or some cleanup process did that, and that's what led to the existing issue | 00:24 |
---|---|---|
teward | at this point I just want them to state a better error | 00:25 |
lubot | <teward001> @wxl23 @kc2bez @tsimonq2 if we're deleting files from the datastore in the backend that's the problem - that needs to not happen because the assumption is S3 hosted files will stay there perpetually | 00:32 |
lubot | <kc2bez> Agreed, that seems like the wrong way to remove them. | 00:34 |
lubot | <teward001> correct. | 00:36 |
lubot | <teward001> also upstream indicates the files shouldn't be removed in these cases anyways | 00:36 |
lubot | <teward001> so my 'bug report' is to use a better error message | 00:36 |
lubot | <kc2bez> moar detail would be nice. | 00:37 |
lubot | <teward001> yep | 00:37 |
lubot | <teward001> To quote upstream dev: | 00:37 |
lubot | <teward001> We could raise a more tailored error message here (“File data has been destroyed in the backing storage engine and can not be recovered.”), but the expectation is that S3 is a permanent datastore. If you destroy data in S3 manually, that will generally break Phabricator, just like Phabricator would break if you deleted some rows in | 00:37 |
lubot | the database or some of its source code. | 00:37 |
lubot | <teward001> so i just want a more useful error message there | 00:38 |
lubot | <teward001> even with that expectation because some users with deployments of things are... um... 'stupid' is one word but eh | 00:38 |
=== krytarik is now known as kryten | ||
-lugito12:#lubuntu-devel- [rMANUALab39c2c2239e: Update to current directory] lynorian (Lyn Perrine) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rMANUALab39c2c2239e | 10:24 | |
-lugito12:#lubuntu-devel- [rMANUAL22872e30f6f7: remove other uneeded dependencies for html will make snap build faster and is…] lynorian (Lyn Perrine) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rMANUAL22872e30f6f7 | 10:51 | |
lubot | <lynorian> ouch snap stuff is not updating to latest commit when building and I don't know why | 10:55 |
-lugito12:#lubuntu-devel- [rMANUAL961d89b4b449: update libreoffice.png] lynorian (Lyn Perrine) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rMANUAL961d89b4b449 | 11:03 | |
-lugito12:#lubuntu-devel- [rMANUAL4742fbd41403: Update libreoffice_calc.png] lynorian (Lyn Perrine) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rMANUAL4742fbd41403 | 11:36 | |
-lugito12:#lubuntu-devel- [rMANUALdeb1fdb3992b: Update calc-save.png] lynorian (Lyn Perrine) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rMANUALdeb1fdb3992b | 11:50 | |
-lugito12:#lubuntu-devel- [rMANUALef8d3e62e33a: Update calc-specialcharacter.png] lynorian (Lyn Perrine) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rMANUALef8d3e62e33a | 11:53 | |
-lugito12:#lubuntu-devel- [rMANUAL0921d87c51e7: Update calc-link.png] lynorian (Lyn Perrine) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rMANUAL0921d87c51e7 | 12:13 | |
lubot | <tsimonq2> @lynorian [ouch snap stuff is not updating to latest commit when building and I don't know …], Which branch is it on? | 15:17 |
lubot | <tsimonq2> Which Git branch? | 15:18 |
lubot | <MichaelTunnell> Calamares dev briefly talks about Lubuntu implementation of Calamares plus plans for the future of Calamares (switching to C++ & QML) … Lubuntu is a lightweight Ubuntu, which installs LxQt. There are a few Calamares modules for Ubuntu-derivatives that are developed by Lubuntu. Usually I’m an “eager upstream”, and I think that m | 15:44 |
lubot | odules should live upstream. This module, automirror, is really distro-family specific though and I’m happy to see that it’s good code (smart enough to fetch cached GeoIP results) and maintained downstream – and if Lubuntu needs something, they know where I live on IRC. (Edit 2020-04-09: not LXDE, LxQt – I said I don’t pay much attention to what th | 15:44 |
lubot | e environment is, eh.) … https://euroquis.nl//calamares/2020/04/08/calamares-q1.html | 15:44 |
lubot | <kc2bez> Thank you for sharing @MichaelTunnell | 16:15 |
lubot | <HMollerCl> do you know why lxqt.org is offline? | 18:32 |
wxl | https://github.com/lxqt/lxqt.github.io/issues/41 | 18:36 |
ubot93 | Issue 41 in lxqt/lxqt.github.io "lxqt.org is down: Connection reset by peer" [Open] | 18:36 |
lubot | <RikMills> @HMollerCl [do you know why lxqt.org is offline?], currently being merged with knome.org? | 18:37 |
wxl | X'''D | 18:37 |
lubot | <MichaelTunnell> lol | 18:37 |
lubot | <RikMills> welcome to the collective! | 18:38 |
lubot | <MichaelTunnell> We Are Korg! | 18:39 |
lubot | <kc2bez> Resistance is futile. | 18:40 |
lubot | <MichaelTunnell> wait a second . . . KDE sucks at naming stuff so instead of Korg which might be good they would likely just call it KBorg | 18:40 |
lubot | <lynorian> @tsimonq2 [Which branch is it on?], right now it is just from source: https://phab.lubuntu.me/source/manual.git I did not tell it to use a branch so wouldn't that be master by default | 20:43 |
lubot | <tsimonq2> @lynorian [right now it is just from source: https://phab.lubuntu.me/source/manual.git I …], It should be, hm | 22:01 |
lubot | <RikMills> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1872551 | 22:05 |
lubot | <RikMills> does that happen in Lubuntu? | 22:06 |
lubot | <RikMills> @HMollerCl you did the drivers tab did you not? ^^^ | 22:23 |
lubot | <HMollerCl> I didi that tab | 22:32 |
lubot | <HMollerCl> @RikMills ^ | 22:32 |
lubot | <RikMills> Then presumably you were able to test it at the time, and still can? | 22:33 |
lubot | <RikMills> I don't have a nvidia box spare | 22:34 |
lubot | <HMollerCl> I did, I had concerns however on how it would be affected in secure boot environments | 22:34 |
lubot | <HMollerCl> I will ask to test in software-properties-gtk then we now if it is a *-qt problem or software-properties-* | 22:36 |
lubot | <RikMills> ack. thanks | 22:36 |
lubot | <HMollerCl> done | 22:39 |
lubot | <RikMills> great. and good night | 22:40 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!