xnox | Laney: https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/debian-cd/revert-modaliases/+merge/382296 so i'm keeping casper_flavour bit => i.e. the work to support dual casper flavours. | 11:55 |
---|---|---|
xnox | Laney: unless you don't want that, then i can revert that too | 11:55 |
xnox | i.e. set casper_flavour="" is still there | 11:55 |
xnox | and $casper_flavour everywhere in the menu entries | 11:55 |
Laney | xnox: you're thinking we might need it later? | 12:00 |
xnox | Laney: there is some bullshit for multiple flavours on subiquity images already. But I guess all that uses "BACKPORT_KERNEL" logic | 12:00 |
xnox | and generates hwe grub | 12:00 |
xnox | actually yeah, we don't need it. | 12:01 |
xnox | let me purge the casper_flavour too then. | 12:01 |
Laney | heh | 12:01 |
xnox | Laney: ok, PR updated. I'm happy with it now. | 12:06 |
Laney | cool | 12:06 |
Laney | xnox: on the drop integrity one | 12:06 |
Laney | what is CDIMAGE_INSTALL_BASE and why does that keep the option? | 12:06 |
Laney | could chase this all back up through ubuntu-cdimage but presumably you already know | 12:07 |
xnox | Laney: that is d-i based alternate installer | 12:07 |
xnox | Which has d-i check. | 12:07 |
xnox | Or maybe it is that weird "live" image without ubiquity, with spliced "d-i" (i.e. reboot to install) | 12:07 |
Laney | never heard of that | 12:08 |
Laney | ok it's set from cron.daily i.e. d-i | 12:08 |
Laney | sounds legit | 12:08 |
xnox | The code is written, it is possible to build all in one d-i & live image. Cause d-i kernel is in /boot, and Casper is in /Casper. Etc. | 12:09 |
xnox | Plus the kernel arg is different for d-i integrity check I think. It's MENU=bin/cdrom/-checker that doesn't exist on ubiquity images | 12:11 |
Laney | i gettit | 12:13 |
Laney | sucks that we keep tools/boot/ALL THE RELEASES | 12:13 |
Laney | makes grepping annoying | 12:13 |
Laney | also that we have tools/boot/focal/things that are unused | 12:14 |
xnox | so svn | 12:27 |
Laney | xnox: why can't I see where maybe-ubiquity was set before your MP | 12:38 |
xnox | Laney: for grub, it never was. | 12:39 |
xnox | Laney: grub only did "Try ubuntu" & "Install ubuntu" | 12:40 |
Laney | no for isolinux | 12:40 |
xnox | Laney: and maybe-ubiquity in bios, is baked into the default arg for silent | 12:40 |
Laney | I think "Try $HUMANPROJECT without installing" is wrong and it should be "Start $HUMAMNPROJECT" like Kubuntu has | 12:41 |
xnox | that breaks translations | 12:42 |
xnox | and the UX is bad, and doesn't match the installed system. | 12:42 |
xnox | i hate the "Start" thing | 12:42 |
xnox | Laney: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/vRHwnpf4dm/ is where maybe-ubiquity is set for bios boot | 12:43 |
Laney | how does it break translations if kubuntu uses it? | 12:43 |
xnox | Laney: cause they didn't translate it, and we are not changing bios boot. | 12:43 |
Laney | oh in a different project OF COURSE | 12:43 |
xnox | and that | 12:43 |
xnox | to me, making entries for installer look as close as possible for post boot, is nice. | 12:44 |
xnox | and after install the default boot entry is just "Ubuntu" | 12:44 |
Laney | so what is Try without installing?!?!?! | 12:44 |
xnox | it boot simply to the live session and one sees desktop | 12:45 |
xnox | aka the current efi behaviour on bionic | 12:46 |
xnox | Laney: do you want hangout? i can broadcast the old & new behaviour of all options | 12:46 |
Laney | it's ok | 12:46 |
Laney | I've got to go eat some food, it will probably make sense once I've done that | 12:46 |
xnox | maybe-ubiquity & only-ubiquity => they go to ubuntu-dm, and either show two buttons to "try" & "install", or it has just the installer mode. | 12:46 |
Laney | yeah I know how the options map to what you end up seeing | 12:47 |
xnox | "nothing" => just boots and autologs in | 12:47 |
Laney | ah you added a livelabelgrub | 12:47 |
Laney | I seeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee | 12:47 |
Laney | ok brb | 12:47 |
xnox | yes i did that =) | 12:48 |
Laney | man | 15:11 |
Laney | merging all these branches at the same time is scary | 15:11 |
Laney | xnox: I don't know about all the implications of the "legacy-server" stuff, maybe ask vorlon to take a look? | 15:33 |
Laney | "ubuntu-server" is encoded all over the place | 15:33 |
xnox | Laney: i know, indeed vorlon is on the hook to review that bit. | 15:36 |
xnox | Laney: we will break people, and that's why we are changing the name. | 15:37 |
xnox | Laney: and like i kind of want to prepublish & publish "legacy" beta once this lands. | 15:37 |
Laney | It's more pieces of our infrastructure that expect the current name that I'm worried about atm | 15:44 |
Laney | happy for vorlon to take that on | 15:44 |
Laney | xnox: it's in, want a build? | 16:51 |
Laney | or try tomorrow's daily | 16:51 |
xnox | Laney: i can't tell what's in =( /me pushes buttons to import mirror | 16:57 |
Laney | muhahah | 16:57 |
xnox | Laney: i think i want desktop image respins | 17:00 |
xnox | Laney: can you trigger those? | 17:00 |
Laney | xnox: ok I'll give you an amd64 without livefs | 18:33 |
Laney | it is running | 18:33 |
xnox | tah | 19:27 |
xnox | very sensible! | 19:28 |
xnox | Laney: somehow i know that from the logs http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/20200415.2 should exist, but it does not | 21:28 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!