[01:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.1-4ubuntu1 => 3.36.1-5ubuntu1] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[02:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (focal-proposed/main) [1.447 => 1.448] (core)
[03:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jtreg (focal-proposed/universe) [5.0-b01-2ubuntu2 => 5.0-b01-2.1] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[03:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flowblade (focal-proposed/universe) [2.4-1 => 2.4.0.1-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[03:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flowblade [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.4.0.1-2]
[04:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mozjs68 (focal-proposed/main) [68.6.0-1 => 68.6.0-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[04:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openjdk-15 [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [15~18-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[05:04] <vorlon> wgrant: publisher, or mirroring?
[05:04] <wgrant> vorlon: publisher, I think
[05:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libinput (focal-proposed/main) [1.15.4-1 => 1.15.5-1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) (sync)
[06:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-input-evdev (focal-proposed/universe) [1:2.10.6-1 => 1:2.10.6-2] (ubuntukylin, xorg) (sync)
[06:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-intel (focal-proposed/main) [2:2.99.917+git20190815-1 => 2:2.99.917+git20200226-1] (desktop-core, xorg) (sync)
[06:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: curl (focal-proposed/main) [7.68.0-1ubuntu1 => 7.68.0-1ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[06:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wslu (focal-proposed/main) [2.3.2-0ubuntu4 => 2.3.6-0ubuntu1] (core)
[06:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected wslu [source] (focal-proposed) [2.3.6-0ubuntu1]
[06:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wslu (focal-proposed/main) [2.3.2-0ubuntu4 => 2.3.6-0ubuntu1] (core)
[07:28] <seb128> ^ wslu is important for the WSL team, would be nice to have it accepted
[07:28] <seb128> they wrote rational and testing on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wslu/+bug/1872879
[07:34] <tjaalton> is there something blocking llvm-toolchain-10? I have a pending mesa update which would migrate it to llvm-10 and adds a couple of bugfixes. the migration to llvm-10 itself is said to fix gpu hangs on certain amd cards (according to debian #956004)
[07:52] <sil2100> seb128: will take a look
[07:57] <sil2100> seb128: ok, this is by no means an issue, but wanted to point that out just in case: looks weird that some patches were just renamed with their patch numbers bumped for no reason, like 0006-Fix-empty-.config-wslu-baseexec.patch became 0009-Fix-empty-.config-wslu-baseexec.patch, but actually there is no 0006 patch used
[07:57] <sil2100> seb128: so the numeration is now like 0004 then 0008, 0009, 0010 etc.
[07:57] <sil2100> But as said, just pointing that out, not an issue ;)
[07:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted curl [source] (focal-proposed) [7.68.0-1ubuntu2]
[07:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wslu [source] (focal-proposed) [2.3.6-0ubuntu1]
[07:59] <seb128> sil2100, thanks for looking, yeah those changes are not needed at this point but I didn't want to go through another roundtrip :/
[07:59] <seb128> but I agree with you
[07:59] <seb128> I will give them the feedback for next time
[08:00] <ginggs> would someone please 'force-reset-test octave-communications/1.2.2-1build1/ppc64el' ? octave-communications was removed on ppc64el
[08:01] <seb128> thanks for accepting!
[08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wpa (focal-proposed/main) [2:2.9-1ubuntu3 => 2:2.9-1ubuntu4] (core)
[08:34] <xnox> tjaalton: llvm-toolchain-10 is in release, and it is the default version.
[08:34] <xnox> tjaalton: where do you see llvm-10 having a block?
[08:37] <tjaalton> xnox: -4?
[08:37] <tjaalton> was synced
[08:37] <tjaalton> on the queue
[08:38] <xnox> tjaalton: yes, awaiting manual review. We are frozen for release and all seeded uploads go through human review. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=
[08:39] <Laney> apw: want to review xnox's base-installer in the queue?
[08:40] <locutus__> we need the one in unapproved after riscv publishes
[08:40] <Laney> I've a feeling I won't give the best quality oversight there:-)
[08:42] <tjaalton> xnox: yes I know that
[08:42] <xnox> Right ok. I don't think it is "blocked", it's just waiting.
[08:42] <tjaalton> wgrant: you mentioned yesterday that the llvm sync (-4) can't migrate yet, because you needed -3 for something still?
[08:43] <wgrant> tjaalton: -3 needs to remain published somewhere in the primary archive so the riscv64 build can complete
[08:43] <tjaalton> ah
[08:43] <wgrant> But it's in the release pocket now, so it would be sufficient to prevent -4 from migrating I suppose
[08:44] <tjaalton> how long does it make to build? :)
[08:44] <tjaalton> *take
[08:44] <xnox> Days
[08:44] <tjaalton> sigh :)
[08:44] <tjaalton> what is this risc thing used for anyway? :)
[08:45] <tjaalton> (nevermind)
[09:08] <locutus__> wgrant, you can accept it *now* and I can open a block-proposed bug
[09:08] <locutus__> so we don't loose days
[09:09] <wgrant> locutus__: I'm not on the release team, but that sounds like a reasonable idea, yeah
[09:10] <locutus__> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-10/+bug/1872932
[09:10] <locutus__> done
[09:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openmpi (focal-proposed/universe) [4.0.3~rc4-0ubuntu2 => 4.0.3-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[09:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rapid-photo-downloader (focal-proposed/universe) [0.9.20-0ubuntu1 => 0.9.22-0ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio)
[09:20] <tjaalton> locutus__: thanks
[09:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-10 (focal-proposed/main) [10-20200411-0ubuntu1 => 10-20200411-0ubuntu2] (i386-whitelist)
[10:03] <RikMills> kubuntu and xubuntu ISOs failed to build today (maybe others) https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/rWXwnGdQrK/
[10:06] <Laney> should be fixed if you retry
[10:12] <mitya57> Can someone please approve/decline bug 1871077? Universe package, not seeded, and I would really like to have it in before the final freeze.
[10:12] <mitya57> sil2100: maybe I can ask you? ↑
[10:15] <sil2100> mitya57: looking now o/
[10:15] <Laney> mitya57: Looks ok, you can go ahead (feel free to paste this into the bug)
[10:16]  * Laney steals from sil2100 
[10:18] <sil2100> eeek, ok, just gave a +1 on teh bug anyway
[10:18] <sil2100> mitya57: so a +2 then, please sync!
[10:18] <mitya57> sil2100: thanks a lot!
[10:19] <mitya57> And thanks Laney too :)
[10:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openjdk-15 [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [15~18-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: retext (focal-proposed/universe) [7.0.4-1 => 7.1.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[10:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yaru-theme (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.4 => 20.04.5] (desktop-core)
[10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted retext [sync] (focal-proposed) [7.1.0-1]
[10:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chrony (focal-proposed/main) [3.5-6ubuntu3 => 3.5-6ubuntu4] (core)
[10:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chrony (bionic-proposed/main) [3.2-4ubuntu4.2 => 3.2-4ubuntu4.3] (ubuntu-server)
[10:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wpa [source] (focal-proposed) [2:2.9-1ubuntu4]
[10:33] <jbicha> ubuntu-archive please take a look at some removal requests: bug 1872588 bug 1872590 bug 1872593 bug 1872598
[10:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: akonadi (focal-proposed/universe) [4:19.12.3-0ubuntu1 => 4:19.12.3-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu)
[10:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ksmtp (focal-proposed/universe) [19.12.3-0ubuntu1 => 19.12.3-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu)
[10:38] <RikMills> sil2100: ^^ couple of fixes for PIM
[10:38] <RikMills> Laney: thanks. retrying ISO :)
[10:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted akonadi [source] (focal-proposed) [4:19.12.3-0ubuntu2]
[10:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ksmtp [source] (focal-proposed) [19.12.3-0ubuntu2]
[10:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [1.448]
[10:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: what-is-python (focal-proposed/main) [3 => 4] (no packageset)
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: feedreader (focal-proposed/universe) [2.10.0-1 => 2.10.0-1.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted feedreader [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.10.0-1.1]
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted what-is-python [source] (focal-proposed) [4]
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: oem-somerville-three-eyed-raven-meta (focal-proposed/main) [20.04~ubuntu1 => 20.04~ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[10:54] <ginggs> would someone please approve openmpi?  it would be nice to ship with the final release instead of release candidate 4.  upstream changelog mentions a couple of bugs squashed
[11:02] <apw> Laney: looks ok ... done
[11:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-installer [source] (focal-proposed) [1.158ubuntu6]
[11:02] <Laney> merci!
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: git (focal-proposed/main) [1:2.25.1-1ubuntu1 => 1:2.25.1-1ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[11:13] <Laney> locutus__: why are we taking a new version of meson now?
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (focal-proposed/main) [11ubuntu4 => 11ubuntu5] (core, i386-whitelist)
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-launchpadlib (focal-proposed/main) [1.10.10-1 => 1.10.11-1] (core) (sync)
[11:29] <locutus__> Laney, I dont' remember, python fixes, boost fixes, and some cmake integration of libsdl or similar, that IIRC was preventing something in the archive from building correctly, but after one week I forgot... I remember I wrote it here
[11:30] <locutus__> https://mesonbuild.com/Release-notes-for-0-54-0.html
[11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu25 => 2.04-1ubuntu26] (core)
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (focal-proposed/main) [1.141 => 1.142] (core)
[11:44] <Laney> well it's not like meson updates have always been plain sailing ...
[11:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vim (focal-proposed/main) [2:8.1.2269-1ubuntu4 => 2:8.1.2269-1ubuntu5] (core, i386-whitelist)
[12:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mariadb-10.3 (focal-proposed/universe) [1:10.3.22-1 => 1:10.3.22-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mariadb-10.3 [source] (focal-proposed) [1:10.3.22-1ubuntu1]
[12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-installer (focal-proposed/main) [1.158ubuntu6 => 1.158ubuntu7] (core, i386-excludes)
[12:30] <xnox> Laney:  apw: now with extra testsuite FTBFS fixes
[12:30] <Laney> nice to know it was test built 😰
[12:35] <xnox> hahahhahahaha
[12:36] <xnox> Laney:  yes because those alpha arch tests are real
[12:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: latte-dock (focal-proposed/universe) [0.9.10-0ubuntu1 => 0.9.11-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[12:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: smb4k (focal-proposed/universe) [3.0.3-1 => 3.0.4-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted smb4k [source] (focal-proposed) [3.0.4-0ubuntu1]
[12:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (focal-proposed/partner) [1:20200414.1-0ubuntu1 => 1:20200414.1-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[13:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted oem-somerville-three-eyed-raven-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu2]
[13:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openmpi [source] (focal-proposed) [4.0.3-0ubuntu1]
[13:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted landscape-client [source] (focal-proposed) [19.12-0ubuntu4]
[13:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted chrony [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.2-4ubuntu4.3]
[13:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-8 (focal-proposed/universe) [8u252-b07-1 => 8u252-b09-1] (no packageset)
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjdk-8 [source] (focal-proposed) [8u252-b09-1]
[14:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: modemmanager (focal-proposed/main) [1.12.6-1 => 1.12.8-1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) (sync)
[14:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-lts (focal-proposed/main) [11.0.7+9-1ubuntu1 => 11.0.7+10-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[14:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.1-5ubuntu1]
[14:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pop-gtk-theme (focal-proposed/universe) [5.0.0~1576602011~19.10~7760154~ubuntu1 => 5.0.0~1576602011~19.10~7760154~ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[14:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pop-gtk-theme [source] (focal-proposed) [5.0.0~1576602011~19.10~7760154~ubuntu2]
[14:47] <teward> just another poke but we're trying to keep as close to NGINX next-stable so when they cut it from Mainline it's only a version string change.  There's precedent in this from other cycles.  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+bug/1872774 is the FFe request bug, and this is already in the Unapproved queue.
[14:48] <Eickmeyer> Release team: Please ack ardour, it's a critical bugfix upload. Version before (no-change rebuild against libgcc-s1) was failing in areas of key functionality.
[14:48] <Eickmeyer> (bug 1872555)
[14:48] <teward> re: nginx - the intent is once 1.18.0 releases there's minimal changes (version strings only essentially) as a just-before-release or just-after-relase SRU to get us onto the proper version string (but also the proper set of revisions, etc.)
[14:49] <teward> infinity is aware of such precedents in the last several LTS cycles as well (this isn't necessarily a new thing but it still needs FFe exception and approval from the queue)
[14:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zsys (focal-proposed/main) [0.4.3 => 0.4.4] (no packageset)
[15:12] <cpaelzer> could someone cancel chrony 3.5-6ubuntu4 from focal-unapproved I identified another fix that we need
[15:13] <cpaelzer> if not rejected but also not accepted once I have the next upload ready I'll upload a new version but include both in the .changes file - so really look at the version to cancel
[15:13] <cpaelzer> just in case the newer one is already in -unapproved by then
[15:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: open-iscsi (focal-proposed/main) [2.0.874-7.1ubuntu5 => 2.0.874-7.1ubuntu6] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[15:21] <xnox> Odd_Bloke:  ^
[15:21] <xnox> awaiting review
[15:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (focal-proposed/main) [158 => 159] (ubuntu-desktop)
[15:24] <Odd_Bloke> xnox: Thanks!  Who do we need to poke for review?
[15:27] <xnox> Odd_Bloke:  ~ubuntu-release team
[15:28] <xnox> Odd_Bloke:  they are reviewing things constantly though. so wait a bit i guess
[15:28] <Odd_Bloke> Cool.
[15:40] <seb128> could webkit2gtk from the queue be accepted? it's a .1 bugfix version and it usually takes some time to build/autopkgtest so would be nice to have it in today
[15:40] <seb128> the ubuntu diff to fix ppc is in the new version
[15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sshguard (focal-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1 => 2.3.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sshguard [source] (focal-proposed) [2.3.1-1ubuntu1]
[15:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zsys [source] (focal-proposed) [0.4.4]
[15:51] <rbalint> ubuntu-release: needed revert per Ubuntu's decision to stick to iptables ^^
[15:51] <rbalint> nevermind, it got approved automatically as i see
[15:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-iscsi [source] (focal-proposed) [2.0.874-7.1ubuntu6]
[15:52] <Odd_Bloke> \o/
[15:52] <jchittum> w00 Thanks!
[15:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjdk-lts [source] (focal-proposed) [11.0.7+10-2ubuntu1]
[15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added openjdk-12 to i386-whitelist in focal
[15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20200414.1-0ubuntu2]
[16:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-launchpadlib [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.10.11-1]
[16:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: manila-ui (focal-proposed/universe) [1:2.19.2~git2020041315.301fc4e-0ubuntu1 => 1:2.19.2~git2020041511.a2dcb0e-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted manila-ui [source] (focal-proposed) [1:2.19.2~git2020041511.a2dcb0e-0ubuntu1]
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.4-dfsg-4ubuntu20.04.1 => 6.1.6-dfsg-1ubuntu20.04.1] (no packageset)
[16:12] <LocutusOfBorg> wgrant, I don't think llvm-toolchain-10 will ever end on riscv64
[16:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-hwe [source] (focal-proposed) [6.1.6-dfsg-1ubuntu20.04.1]
[16:13] <LocutusOfBorg> tjaalton, where is xserver-xorg-dev-hwe-20.04?
[16:14] <wgrant> LocutusOfBorg: A *really* well-timed network glitch made LP think the buildd had died. The build is still going in the background, and I'll fix LP's view of it in the morning.
[16:14] <wgrant> Same with opencv
[16:14] <wgrant> *great* timing.
[16:18] <tjaalton> LocutusOfBorg: how so?
[16:19] <tjaalton> LocutusOfBorg: I mean, why'd you need one?
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chrony (focal-proposed/main) [3.5-6ubuntu3 => 3.5-6ubuntu5] (core)
[16:34] <cpaelzer> can someone please accept that chrony focal upload of 3.5-6ubuntu5 that we see above
[16:35] <cpaelzer> that will avoid some issues due to systemd changes with timesyncd
[16:35] <cpaelzer> rbalint: FYI ^^ this includes the test hardning for 1873031
[16:36] <cpaelzer> let me know what you intend for 1873031 for systemd itself once you have decided on an approach, I'm interested to stay in the loop how all that goes forward
[16:37] <cpaelzer> for requests like the one above, can we already group-highlight ubuntu-release the same way we can for ubuntu-archive?
[16:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apache2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.4.41-4ubuntu3]
[16:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-builder [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.36.0-3]
[16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gcc-10 [source] (focal-proposed) [10-20200411-0ubuntu2]
[16:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu [source] (focal-proposed) [159]
[16:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: clevis (eoan-proposed/universe) [11-2 => 11-2ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[16:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: clevis (bionic-proposed/universe) [8-1 => 8-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[17:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hedgewars (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-4ubuntu1 => 1.0.0-5] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:10] <LocutusOfBorg> tjaalton, shouldn't somebody provide the new 20.04 virtual package?
[17:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hedgewars [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.0.0-5]
[17:12] <tjaalton> LocutusOfBorg: eventually
[17:27] <Eickmeyer> Release team: Please ack ardour, it's a critical bugfix upload. Version before (no-change rebuild against libgcc-s1) was failing in areas of key functionality. (bug 1872555)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjdk-15 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [15~18-1ubuntu1]
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjdk-15 [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [15~18-1ubuntu1]
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjdk-15 [arm64] (focal-proposed) [15~18-1ubuntu1]
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjdk-15 [s390x] (focal-proposed) [15~18-1ubuntu1]
[17:33] <sil2100> Eickmeyer: let me take a look
[17:33] <ahasenack> hello, could someone please badtest mongodb i386? It's not built for that arch
[17:33] <ahasenack> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#mongodb
[17:36] <sil2100> Eickmeyer: I see the upload removes quite a lot of files as well, were those some unrelated leftovers?
[17:36] <sil2100> Eickmeyer: like libs/ardour/msvc/msvc_libardour.cc etc
[17:37] <Eickmeyer> sil2100: Yes, those were unrelated leftovers. Previous version of the .orig used a repack I did, this one's straight from the Debian archives with a bunch of patches.
[17:38] <Eickmeyer> sil2100: cjwatson has further information in the backscroll, he did the upload.
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution-data-server (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.1-1 => 3.36.1-2] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[17:58] <sil2100> Eickmeyer: ah, ok! ;)
[17:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ardour [source] (focal-proposed) [1:5.12.0-3ubuntu4]
[17:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.5 => 1:20.04.6] (core)
[18:01] <bdmurray> sil2100: I'm deactivating milestones for 20.04 that have passed. Is that documented anywhere?
[18:01] <Eickmeyer> Thanks, sil2100!!!
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: resource-agents (focal-proposed/main) [1:4.5.0-2ubuntu1 => 1:4.5.0-2ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)
[18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vim [source] (focal-proposed) [2:8.1.2269-1ubuntu5]
[18:32] <Laney> bdmurray: that doesn't happen when the date passes?
[18:33] <Laney> apparently not
[18:33] <bdmurray> Ooh, we could make it LP's problem
[18:34] <Laney> I checked ubuntu-18.04.3 which is in the past but still active
[18:35]  * Laney is having fun pdb-ing britney2.py
[18:35] <Laney> trying to find out why BREAK_ARCHES is not breaking the arch
[18:42] <vorlon> Laney: from code inspection, I understand that it only affects the update_output phase, not the excuses phase; so a package which is a candidate is allowed to break OTHER packages on the arch and increase uninstallability count, but a package which has unsatisfiable deps will still not be a candidate even if it's already uninstallable in release :P
[18:43] <seb128> could webkit2gtk from the queue be accepted? it's a .1 bugfix version and it usually takes some time to build/autopkgtest so would be nice to have it in today
[18:44] <seb128> the ubuntu delta being dropped was not a mistake, the packaging changes are in debian
[18:44] <seb128> the ppc fix is in the new upstream version
[18:44] <vorlon> syncs are harder to review fwiw
[18:47] <seb128> someone should improve the review tools, that keeps being an issue :-/
[18:47] <seb128> it's not paying us back for being good citizen, we get our diff in Debian and lower work but that get in the way of the work to land :(
[18:49] <sil2100> Reviewing source syncs for me got a bit easier after I made a stupid wrapper script that does the diff and diffstat for me
[18:49] <sil2100> Binary syncs are still an issue
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted webkit2gtk [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.28.1-1]
[18:52] <vorlon> Laney: oh, but then I also see that cairo-dock-plug-ins/riscv4 is a candidate, but not accepted because it increases uninstallability, shrug
[18:53] <doko> sil2100: well, sometimes you are requesting those ;p
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added openjdk-13 to i386-whitelist in focal
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added openjdk-14 to i386-whitelist in focal
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added openjdk-15 to i386-whitelist in focal
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added openjdk-8 to i386-whitelist in focal
[18:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected meson [source] (focal-proposed) [0.54.0-1ubuntu1]
[18:59] <Laney> vorlon: I'm looking at things being invalidated at excuses, like gvfs
[19:00] <Laney> probably not going to get there tonight
[19:00] <sil2100> doko: but here I know the diff beforehand ;)
[19:01] <sil2100> But yes ;p
[19:04] <jdstrand> hey, can someone push isc-dhcp through? it isn't migrating cause of chrony breakage wrt systemd changes: time-sources-from-dhcp-servers FAIL stderr: Failed to try-restart systemd-timesyncd.service: Unit systemd-timesyncd.service is masked.
[19:04] <jdstrand> that seems related to bug #1872902
[19:05] <jdstrand> that might be the wrong bug
[19:05]  * jdstrand looks
[19:06] <jdstrand> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1849156/comments/15
[19:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bamf [source] (focal-proposed) [0.5.3+18.04.20180207.2-0ubuntu2]
[19:06] <jdstrand> and the actual bug for this is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1873031
[19:11] <ahasenack> Laney: hi, around? Could you please add mongodb./i386 to your badtest hint? You have a section saying it's no longer built for armhf and i386, but only badtest armhf
[19:12] <ahasenack> commit 2522
[19:13] <Laney> ahasenack: I did add it then, it must have been dropped later, can you find that?
[19:13] <ahasenack> does bzr have the equivalent of git log -S?
[19:13] <ahasenack> :)
[19:15]  * Laney dunno
[19:15] <ahasenack> https://launchpad.net/bzr-grep
[19:16] <cpaelzer> jdstrand: yes you found the right bug 1849156
[19:16] <cpaelzer> jdstrand: a fix for that is waiting in focal-unapproved
[19:16] <cpaelzer> that will make the test resilient against the stderr that is thrown until systemd has fixed it for real
[19:16] <ahasenack> found it
[19:16] <ahasenack> Laney:
[19:16] <ahasenack> [19:16] <ahasenack>   [19:16] <ahasenack>     -force-badtest mongodb/all/i386
[19:17] <cpaelzer> jdstrand: I'm waiting for someone in ubuntu-release to accept it and have pinged a few times already
[19:17] <jdstrand> cool. I don't think that isc-dhcp in -proposed needs to be hung up on that though
[19:17] <ahasenack> message:
[19:17] <ahasenack>   drop many i386 hints that are no longer needed
[19:17] <ahasenack> vorlon dropped it
[19:17] <jdstrand> cpaelzer: ack, thanks
[19:17] <cpaelzer> if that is the only thing left I agree
[19:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gjs [source] (focal-proposed) [1.64.1-2ubuntu1]
[19:24] <Eickmeyer> Release team: I think the missing piece of the puzzle is tjaalton's upload of rapid-photo-downloader needs an ack then Ubuntu Studio will be ready for Final Freeze.
[19:28] <Laney> cpaelzer: Will add it back, but I'm not sure why the test got requested
[19:31] <cpaelzer> Laney: what do you mean - why the chrony test got requetse don the isc-dhcp upload?
[19:32] <Laney> oops
[19:32] <Laney> I meant to ping ahasenack, sorry!
[19:32] <Laney> you server people are all the same :p
[19:32] <ahasenack> tall
[19:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-aws (bionic-updates/main) [4.15.0-1066.70 => 4.15.0-1065.69] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie) (sync)
[19:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-installer [source] (focal-proposed) [1.158ubuntu7]
[19:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted chrony [source] (focal-proposed) [3.5-6ubuntu5]
[19:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rapid-photo-downloader [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.22-0ubuntu1]
[19:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted chrony [source] (focal-proposed) [3.5-6ubuntu4]
[19:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yaru-theme [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.5]
[19:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted git [source] (focal-proposed) [1:2.25.1-1ubuntu2]
[19:43] <TJ-> I added patches for weechat to fix a python3 linking regression, and recent CVEs, a few days ago but it doesn't seem to have been processed. Is there anyone could handle that before release?  Bug #1872425
[20:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-bunny (focal-proposed/universe) [2.14.4-2 => 2.14.4-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-aws [sync] (bionic-updates) [4.15.0-1065.69]
[20:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-bunny [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.14.4-3]
[20:09] <Eickmeyer> Thanks for the r-p-d accept!
[20:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mozjs68 [source] (focal-proposed) [68.6.0-1ubuntu1]
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bind9 (focal-proposed/main) [1:9.16.1-0ubuntu1 => 1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[21:08] <kc2bez> It looks like the Lubuntu iso build is taking a long time https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/focal/lubuntu/+build/211713
[21:08] <kc2bez> Is there a known issue? ^
[21:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (focal-proposed/main) [2:16.0.0~b3~git2020041013.e74c8f8c88-0ubuntu1 => 2:16.0.0~b3~git2020041516.5f42488a9a-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[21:22] <locutus_> ping please accept llvm-toolchain-10! it takes days to build
[21:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (focal-proposed/main) [1:13.99.1-1ubuntu2 => 1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[21:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireguard-linux-compat (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.20200413-1 => 1.0.20200413-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[21:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireguard-linux-compat [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.0.20200413-1]
[21:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd-glib (focal-proposed/main) [1.57-0ubuntu1 => 1.57-0ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[21:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (focal-proposed/main) [20.1-10-g71af48df-0ubuntu3 => 20.1-10-g71af48df-0ubuntu4] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud)
[21:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glib2.0 (focal-proposed/main) [2.64.1-1 => 2.64.2-1~fakesync1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[21:40] <bdmurray> kc2bez: that looks like something we saw during the beta. Are any other images taking a long time?
[21:46] <kc2bez> bdmurray: From what I looked at other flavors built in the normal time.
[21:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26]
[21:47] <bdmurray> kc2bez: Okay, I'm looking into it
[21:47] <kc2bez> Thanks.
[21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (focal-proposed) [1.142]
[21:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-files [source] (focal-proposed) [11ubuntu5]
[22:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (eoan-proposed/main) [2.620.1 => 2.620.2] (desktop-core)
[22:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26 => 2.04-1ubuntu26] (core)
[22:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26 => 2.04-1ubuntu26] (core)
[22:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: enigmail (focal-proposed/universe) [2:2.1.5+ds1-1 => 2:2.1.6+ds1-1] (mozilla) (sync)
[22:47] <RikMills> vorlon: excuses says for kdepim-addons, missing build on amd64,arm64,armhf whic is not true https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdepim-addons/19.12.3-0ubuntu1
[23:00] <RikMills> Launchpad encountered an internal error during the following operation: copying package kdepim-addons.  It was logged with id OOPS-6ee96f352188b58513339ddcda5997f5.  Sorry for the inconvenience.
[23:00] <RikMills> maybe that is why?
[23:00] <RikMills> cjwatson wgrant?
[23:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: exo (focal-proposed/universe) [0.12.11-1 => 0.12.11-1ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio, xubuntu)
[23:05] <wgrant> RikMills: That's a rare race condition in the copier, but the copy completed successfully.
[23:05] <wgrant> Wow, what a mess
[23:05] <RikMills> wgrant: excuses does not agree
[23:05] <wgrant> Duplicate builds.
[23:06] <wgrant> That's never meant to be able to happen. Quite possibly the copier succeeded but got very confused because the build state is invalid.
[23:06] <RikMills> this is also fun https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kimap/19.12.3-0ubuntu1
[23:06] <RikMills> in both release and proposed!
[23:07] <wgrant> That at least is probably just a proposed-migration bug. That state is perfectly legal in the archive.
[23:07] <wgrant> kdepim-addons, though... those duplicate builds are probably a Launchpad race.
[23:07] <wgrant> One that has existed forever, but I don't think we've ever actually seen it happen.
[23:08] <RikMills> aren't I lucky! lol
[23:08] <wgrant> So, so lucky.
[23:09] <wgrant> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/amd64/kdepim-addons <- proposed-migration deleted the binaries
[23:09] <RikMills> wgrant: is kdepim-addons fixable, or should I just do a no-change rebuild and forget the ubuntu1?
[23:10] <wgrant> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdepim-addons/19.12.3-0ubuntu1/+publishinghistory <- looks like two copies raced, creating the two sets of weird-arch builds. proposed-migration tried to migrate one of them, but the binaries didn't make it across and it left the other source publication around. So now it's trying to migrate again based on the surviving source publication, but the binaries are
[23:10] <wgrant> already gone.
[23:10] <wgrant> I think if I revive the binaries in -proposed it should all work.
[23:11] <RikMills> wgrant: great if you could, as it is causing some users dep issues in release
[23:12] <wgrant> hellooooo copier, are you there?
[23:14] <wgrant> Ah, copy failed because of the duplicate builds
[23:14] <wgrant> Let me see what I can do about those.
[23:14] <wgrant> I already had some DB surgery planned for this morning anyway...
[23:14] <RikMills> ty :)
[23:14]  * wgrant also sees how many other violations there are, to see if he can just add a DB constraint\
[23:15] <RikMills> for the record...
[23:15] <RikMills> Launchpad encountered an internal error during the following operation: copying package kimap
[23:15] <RikMills> Launchpad encountered an internal error during the following operation: copying package mbox-importer
[23:16] <wgrant> I wonder if there were two proposed-migrations running in parallel, or it just got really unlucky.
[23:16] <RikMills> those emails got 'filtered' by my client rules
[23:24] <Ukikie> With regards to that exo upload I did, if you want a full diffoscope: http://paste.openstack.org/show/uH1u8QCjLep3WGSyRHOt/
[23:25] <Ukikie> This should be fairly low impact, just !amd64 systems.
[23:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fonts-beng-extra (focal-proposed/main) [1.0-6ubuntu1 => 1.0-7] (desktop-core, personal-gunnarhj) (sync)
[23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fonts-deva-extra (focal-proposed/main) [3.0-4ubuntu1 => 3.0-5] (desktop-core, personal-gunnarhj) (sync)
[23:33] <wgrant> RikMills: It was only kdepim-addons that lost the race here, though it's happened to seven other packages in the primary archive over time. I'll get it fixed up and revive its binaries, so proposed-migration can proceed as normal.
[23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fonts-gujr-extra (focal-proposed/main) [1.0-7 => 1.0.1-1] (desktop-core, personal-gunnarhj) (sync)
[23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fonts-guru-extra (focal-proposed/main) [2.0-4ubuntu2 => 2.0-5] (desktop-core, personal-gunnarhj) (sync)
[23:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fonts-orya-extra (focal-proposed/main) [2.0-5ubuntu1 => 2.0-6] (desktop-core, personal-gunnarhj) (sync)
[23:49] <RikMills> wgrant: thank you!
[23:50] <Eickmeyer> Is ardour failing to migrate due to riscv64?
[23:50] <Eickmeyer> Granted, it's only been 5 hours, just a little concerned.
[23:50] <wgrant> missing build on riscv64: ardour (from 1:5.12.0-3ubuntu3)
[23:51] <Eickmeyer> Yep, I was told I shouldn't have to worry about riscv64.
[23:53] <Eickmeyer> Though, looks like it built the previous version, so likely this one will build fine too.
[23:54] <Eickmeyer> Wouldn't think it would take 5 hours though, wgrant.
[23:56] <wgrant> We're very used to having fast CPUs :)
[23:57] <Eickmeyer> heh, indeed.
[23:57] <wgrant> Though riscv64 will hopefully get faster in not too long.
[23:57] <Eickmeyer> Looks like it's being emulated?
[23:57] <wgrant> At present, yeah, though the actual chip I have on my desk is only faster in certain workloads :(
[23:58] <Eickmeyer> Heh, oh well. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
[23:58] <wgrant> It's still a very slow in-order core. But there'll be some fancier ones coming in not too long, hopefully.
[23:58] <Eickmeyer> Oh, that would be good.