[00:33] <kryten> So it seems fixing the CD Image theming for Lubuntu doesn't even have a Phab task and got lost again?  (I've provided CSS sufficient for this about the same time last year, is why I still bother about it.)
 @kryten [<kryten> So it seems fixing the CD Image theming for Lubuntu doesn't even have a …], Wait, you did?
 Oh, so you know about the thing with Canonical Web Team revamping the CSS right?
 I apologize for missing it if you did
[00:35] <kryten> You don't remember.. :'(  And yeah.
[00:35] <kryten> We've chatted in PM at the time.
 To be fair, it's been a hell of a year for me. I wouldn't be surprised if I didn't remember such an event
 (And that's all I'll say publicly.)
 Anyway, can you resend it please?
[00:36] <kryten> Yeah, I know.  And I also know someone else had it on their plate, so I figured it's gonna be done sometime, but it's been silent for some time now..
[00:37] <kryten> Yeah, I'll pastebin it.
[00:39] <kryten> http://paste.openstack.org/show/2gJg6K5puJ019jl3lTYe/ - notice it still refers to xnox's temp image, since that'll have to be uploaded properly then.
[01:58] <kryten> http://paste.openstack.org/show/krpHzdeRSejvQSX5wi3G/ - noticed one thing that changed since (overflow), added a workaround for the custom header CSS that is still there, and added comments.
 Hi, is there someone who can remind me how to git push to launchpad?
 do I need to modify the changelog?
 I'm fixing https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1872551
[03:20] <kryten> https://code.launchpad.net/~hmollercl/software-properties/+git/software-properties - well, given there is this since before you asked even, it seems you got the basics down there though?..  And yeah, add a changelog entry as previously, with "(LP: #1872551)" appended.
 @kryten [<kryten> https://code.launchpad.net/~hmollercl/software-properties/+git/software …], thanks!
 I mean, I had some doubts because I normally use github and phab, not launchapd
 @RikMills I put you as reviewer, is ok? https://code.launchpad.net/~hmollercl/software-properties/+git/software-properties/+merge/382349
[04:02] <guiverc> a strange observation; default install on a box wants to write MBR to floppy-drive???  (I only recently activated floppy in bios for lubu support on askubu)
[04:06] <kryten> -@tsimonq2: Ah, I remember now, last time I just disabled the whole current custom style.css, that's why I didn't have to hide the scrollbar violently or care about the custom header.  Which I still think looks much better than a mix of the two, and also in line with the rest of the Ubuntu family.
[04:23] <kryten> -@tsimonq2: If you are going to base the redesign on my suggestions, then I'd fine-tune it a bit more still.
[04:28] <kryten> The pending Phab task for a new (any really) favicon on lubuntu.me would also apply to this one btw (which still has the old one even).
[05:25] -lugito12:#lubuntu-devel- [rMANUAL5402de5f62b5: Update version number] lynorian (Lyn Perrine) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rMANUAL5402de5f62b5
 @HMollerCl [@RikMills I put you as reviewer, is ok? https://code.launchpad.net/~hmollercl/so …], No, I can't review or upload
 @RikMills [No, I can't review or upload], Ok, will have to put @tsimonq2 then
 @HMollerCl [Ok, will have to put @tsimonq2 then], I got the debian apt guy/core-dev to look in the end. He made his own changes, and uploaded a modified fix
 So no need to merge mine?
 @HMollerCl [So no need to merge mine?], he rejected yours
 Good, thanks!
 he commented on it, so go see
 👍
 bonus is, it's his fix now. ;)
 aaaa, he did a more smart thing, instead of having the same function in 2 places, he moved it to a gtk/qt independet file
 yes
[13:37] -lugito12:#lubuntu-devel- [rMANUAL6c0e1bc23a60: Update wording] lynorian (Lyn Perrine) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rMANUAL6c0e1bc23a60
[13:43] -lugito12:#lubuntu-devel- [rMANUALff8494e0385b: specify path in sddm configuration] lynorian (Lyn Perrine) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rMANUALff8494e0385b
 Found a bot for GitLab repos, in case your interested in using it for GitLab repos, if you have any (`https://integram.org/gitlab/csWpboS8VzG`)
 I tested it for my distro and it works well
 @gitlab_bot
[15:34] -lugito12:#lubuntu-devel- [rMANUAL09596225796f: Update wording on CPU usage] lynorian (Lyn Perrine) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rMANUAL09596225796f
 @HMollerCl fix accepted into proposed
 good to know
[15:59] -lugito12:#lubuntu-devel- [rMANUAL118833cf1640: Fix indentation] lynorian (Lyn Perrine) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rMANUAL118833cf1640
 so the reason LXQt site is down is because their nameservers are pointing to generic Gandi servers. It looks like it was updated just a few days ago .  . . hopefully it doesnt mean what I think it means (squatter) ]
 That would be most unfortunate.
 they would have had to let it lapse for months to let that happen so I super hope they didnt do that but I dont know why they would randomly reset the nameservers to generics. its pretty weird to say the least
 @rs2009 [Found a bot for GitLab repos, in case your interested in using it for GitLab rep …], We don't have any
 @tsimonq2 [To be fair, it's been a hell of a year for me. I wouldn't be surprised if I didn …], It has been like that for everyone.
 @rs2009 [I tested it for my distro and it works well], Which distro? Links please.
 Also, we like lugito more. ;)
 @The_LoudSpeaker [It has been like that for everyone.], I hope that your year hasn't been as horrible as mine has
[19:48] <wxl> also he fails more spectactularly
 @tsimonq2 [I hope that your year hasn't been as horrible as mine has], Same.
 @wxl [<wxl> also he fails more spectactularly], XD
 I miss killing lugito.
 I will be back very soon I promise lugito. :)
[21:03] <kc2bez> Shall we have a meeting?
[21:03] <wxl> sure why not
[21:03] <kc2bez> !standup
 Hey everyone
 I'm here
[21:05] <kc2bez> ack
 ack
[21:05] <wxl> o\
 XD
[21:05] <kc2bez> XD
[21:05] <kc2bez> Nice to see you here.
 It's good to be here.
[21:07] <kc2bez> We're into final freeze territory now 
[21:08] <tsimonq2> Absolutely.
[21:08] <tsimonq2> Crunch time.
[21:09] <tsimonq2> So, a couple of things we'll need for release.
[21:09] <tsimonq2> I've dedicated time on my calendar for Lubuntu.
[21:09] <tsimonq2> Do we have tentative release notes yet?
[21:09] <kc2bez> I have to start over, so no
[21:09] <tsimonq2> kc2bez: Also, are you going to be around on release day if I wanted to show you the fun infra magic?
[21:09] <tsimonq2> Ack. :(
[21:09] <kc2bez> I will be around
[21:10] <tsimonq2> Honestly, what I'd do is just start with what we have for 19.10.
[21:10] <tsimonq2> We can use that general format.
[21:10] <tsimonq2> Plus, I'm going to want something like an FAQ.
[21:10] <tsimonq2> Well, our users are the ones (probably) wanting it. :P
[21:10] <tsimonq2> I'll get a doc started right now.
[21:11] <kc2bez> Sweet, thanks
[21:11] <tsimonq2> Next, how are things looking on the QA front? I know jphilips has been really energized when it comes to that but I'd like to know where we stand as a flavor.
[21:11] <wxl> i just want to toss in that i've been concerned about this particular issue for a while now and have had no chance to follow up on it. every time i have time, it only seems to be for a few minutes https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1334
[21:12] <kc2bez> I am concerned as well, we need it in the release notes at the very least.
[21:12] <tsimonq2> I will dig into that once I have release noted started.
[21:12] <tsimonq2> !standup
[21:12] <tsimonq2> Ping me with what you need.
[21:12] <tsimonq2> After I look into that issue, the main task is being cleaned out.
[21:13] <tsimonq2> Anything we can't do in point releases or for the final is being punted.
[21:13] <wxl> regarding that issue, you can see we need to try to build a new util-linux and perhaps kpmcore4
[21:13] <tsimonq2> wxl: That issue is consistently reproducible, correct?
[21:14] <tsimonq2> kc2bez: https://notes.lubuntu.me/DiVO5X1lQtGE3BWVjhkgjg# - right now it
[21:14] <tsimonq2> Ooops, returned too early.
[21:14] <tsimonq2> It's just a copy of the 19.10 notes.
[21:14] <kc2bez> Thanks 
[21:14] <wxl> tsimonq2: again, not my bug report but i do know that azdays had it popping up and that drove him mad ultimately. see discourse on that
[21:14] <tsimonq2> I'll go and 20.04ify it.
[21:15] <tsimonq2> I'll get a daily syncing now.
[21:15] <kc2bez> I need @teward001 to send me a login for notes. Telegram will do.
[21:16] <wxl> fwiw azdays is MarkF on launchpad
[21:16] <tsimonq2> wxl: Ohh, the name is familiar.
[21:16] <tsimonq2> kc2bez: Go ahead and shoot him an email, so we can get this done ASAP.
[21:17] <tsimonq2> He's used to my nag emails at this point. :P
[21:17] <kc2bez> Okie dokie I will send another.
[21:17] <wxl> tsimonq2: i think this particular issue drove him to stop contributing believe it or not but it seems guiverc has had some experience with it too
[21:18] <guiverc> sorry I'm not sure which issue you're talking about
[21:19] <tsimonq2> wxl: Ouch. That's pretty bad. Do you want do attempt some recon?
[21:19] <tsimonq2> guiverc: re: Cala manual partitioning.
[21:20] <wxl> i'm not even sure if we have a clear description
[21:20] <wxl> but i do know that others can reproduce it
[21:20] <wxl> so i was thinking of building fresh util-linux and kpmcore4 and throwing it in a ppa and letting them see if they can reproduce then
[21:21] <guiverc> yep - loads of experience (one box only though)
[21:22] <kc2bez> guiverc do you have others with the same number of partitions?
[21:23] <tsimonq2> I'll have packages in a PPA within the hour.
[21:23] <guiverc> most probably; d780 (slightly newer, same outside box) but it has debian instead of ex-suse & extra lubuntu instead of xp
[21:24] <kc2bez> I think the number of primary partitions is sort of a key component to the bug
[21:24] <kc2bez> If I understand correctly
[21:25] <guiverc> I can check/compare..
[21:27] <kc2bez> So when cala goes to replace the partition it tries to actually create a 5th which is a no-no. 
[21:27] <kc2bez> not so much cala but sfdisk
[21:28] <wxl> well supposedly
[21:28] <kc2bez> Yeah, I got no scientific data to back up my claim
[21:29] <guiverc> if it's partition bound, I can create a like setup on dc7700 (hp) or d755-8 for testing
[21:29] <kc2bez> It might be worth a test.
[21:30] <kc2bez> On the upside I landed the artwork and it is in the daily.
[21:30] <tsimonq2> guiverc: If you could please get a setup that can reliably reproduce the bug, I'll have packages for you to test.
[21:31] <guiverc> the box it occurred on has 2 primeary partitions; 5 extended within a primary 
[21:31] <tsimonq2> Alright. I have a daily now, let's see.
[21:32] <tsimonq2> What kind of things are in those partitions?
[21:33] <guiverc> sda1 primary losexp, sda2 extended, sda5 swap, sda6 sys (18.04), sda7 home (18.04), sda9 sys (20.04), sda8 home (20.04); all ext4 except for ntfs + swap
[21:34] <guiverc> s/losexp/xp/  (red alert 2 game)
[21:37] <kc2bez> There was a call in #-flavors to update this too https://help.ubuntu.com/community/FocalUpgrades
 Hi! I've been really busy lately
[21:38] <kc2bez> It is commonplace for all of us I think.
[21:38] <tsimonq2> wxl: My understanding with this patch is that it's only a util-linux thing.
[21:38] <tsimonq2> wxl: kpmcore seems to only be modified in order to more verbosely log the output.
[21:39] <wxl> tsimonq2: right
[21:39] <wxl> and we are way behind on util linux
[21:40] <kc2bez> Debian is too, I think we are in sync.
[21:41] <kc2bez> @HMollerCl where are we at with the LibreOffice issue?
 wit the current setup we have problems when printing and importing as pdf
[21:42] <kc2bez> Ok, I hadn't been following the upstream bug.
[21:42] <guiverc_l> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JM29wEHD-6BvCjhLsM-Nv9iZLHMDgbgE/view?usp=sharing    (partition scheme as viewed in kde partition manager)
 workarounds are, uset gtk vcl or use cairo, but cairo crashes when started libreoffice 2/o app (weiter, calc, etc..)
 upstream bug is solved in version 7.x
 7.0 actually
[21:43] <kc2bez> Thanks Hans
 (which we won't ship)
[21:43] <kc2bez> Right, we need to release note it.
 couldn't log into codi
[21:44] <kc2bez> Send @teward001 a request for a PW
[21:44] <kc2bez> He had to rebuild it.
 aaa, ok
[21:49] <kc2bez> Strange, I landed https://phab.lubuntu.me/D88 but it still show open.
[21:49] -lugito12:#lubuntu-devel- [Needs Review] Add wallpapers from wallpaper contest.: https://phab.lubuntu.me/D88
[21:51] <tsimonq2> Patch building in https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-dev/+archive/ubuntu/util-linux-patch
[21:51] <tsimonq2> Last build in Focal took 5 mins, so we'll have testable packages shortly.
[21:52] <tsimonq2> (Add 10-15 minutes for builder queue, publishing time, etc.)
[21:52] <tsimonq2> guiverc: I would really appreciate it if you could test this on real hardware please. ^
[21:52] <tsimonq2> Meanwhile, I'm firing up a daily in a VM to see if I can repro myself.
[21:53] <guiverc> ack; I take it boot live, add PPA (update/upgrade) & test installs on boxes (d755-5 mentioned earlier esp.)
[21:55] <wxl> kc2bez: i bet that's due to our little missing file bug
[21:56] <kc2bez> Sorry I wasn't following I was typing in another screen
[21:56] <kc2bez> The cala issue?
[21:56] <wxl> the fact that your diff is still open
[21:57] <tsimonq2> guiverc: Yep. Like I mentioned earlier, make sure you can actually upgrade to it first. :)
 @N0um3n0 we should ask people to test in our channels.
[21:57] <kc2bez> Oh yeah, most definitely I don't know what to do with it now though wxl
[21:57] -lugito12:#lubuntu-devel- [T131: Version Number in Plymouth?] kc2bez (Dan Simmons) commented on the task: https://phab.lubuntu.me/T131#3294
[21:59] <wxl> kc2bez: leave a comment on it and not worry about it right now
[21:59] <guiverc> tsimonq2, fyi: maybe a couple/few hours..
[22:00] <tsimonq2> guiverc: No worries, just check in with me when you can.
[22:00] -lugito12:#lubuntu-devel- [T123: 20.04 Artwork] kc2bez (Dan Simmons) commented on the task: https://phab.lubuntu.me/T123#3298
[22:07] -lugito12:#lubuntu-devel- [T34: Smart package removal] kc2bez (Dan Simmons) commented on the task: https://phab.lubuntu.me/T34#3303
[22:12] -lugito12:#lubuntu-devel- [T108: Drop or change pkexec patch in Calamares] kc2bez (Dan Simmons) commented on the task: https://phab.lubuntu.me/T108#3307
[22:14] -lugito12:#lubuntu-devel- [T58: consider minimal install] kc2bez (Dan Simmons) commented on the task: https://phab.lubuntu.me/T58#3311
[23:58] <tsimonq2> kryten: What's the best way to test that CSS you have?