| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xfwm4 (focal-proposed/universe) [4.14.0-2ubuntu1 => 4.14.1-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntustudio, xubuntu) | 00:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected exo [source] (focal-proposed) [0.12.11-1ubuntu1] | 00:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [20.1-10-g71af48df-0ubuntu4] | 00:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bind9 [source] (focal-proposed) [1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2] | 00:11 | |
| Ukikie | Err...'devel' is an accepted convention, but I'll use focal and re-upload. :/ | 00:11 |
|---|---|---|
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd-glib [source] (focal-proposed) [1.57-0ubuntu2] | 00:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libstaroffice (focal-proposed/universe) [0.0.6-1build1 => 0.0.7-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 00:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libstaroffice [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.0.7-1] | 00:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: po4a (focal-proposed/universe) [0.55-1 => 0.57-2] (i386-whitelist) (sync) | 00:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debhelper (focal-proposed/main) [12.10ubuntu1 => 13ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 00:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (focal-proposed/main) [2.20.11-0ubuntu26 => 2.20.11-0ubuntu27] (core, i386-whitelist) | 00:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: exo (focal-proposed/universe) [0.12.11-1 => 0.12.11-1ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio, xubuntu) | 00:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.660 => 2.661] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) | 00:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted exo [source] (focal-proposed) [0.12.11-1ubuntu1] | 00:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-installer (focal-proposed/main) [20101020ubuntu611 => 20101020ubuntu612] (core) | 00:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.11 => 20.04.12] (core) | 00:51 | |
| xnox | ok, accept everything, migrate everything, and it's good enough for candidate images | 00:52 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: thunar (focal-proposed/universe) [1.8.12-1 => 1.8.14-0ubuntu1] (mythbuntu, ubuntustudio, xubuntu) | 01:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xubuntu-default-settings (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04.2 => 20.04.3] (xubuntu) | 01:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-defaults (focal-proposed/main) [2:1.13~1ubuntu1 => 2:1.13~1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) | 01:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kylin-nm (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.3-1 => 1.2.4-1] (ubuntukylin) (sync) | 02:09 | |
| vorlon | RikMills: probably related to the publisher delays that wgrant was mentioning before - it's "published" in launchpad but hasn't made it out yet to where proposed-migration sees it | 02:09 |
| vorlon | RikMills: oh n/m there was a lot more discussion after you highlighted me ;) | 02:10 |
| wgrant | vorlon, RikMills: kdepim-addons should be fixed now | 02:10 |
| wgrant | I did the DB surgery and then revived its dead binaries a few minutes ago | 02:10 |
| vorlon | hurrah | 02:10 |
| RikMills | wgrant: thank you :) | 02:11 |
| wgrant | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/amd64/kdepim-addons <- published fine, so hopefully proposed-migration will catch it next time | 02:13 |
| RikMills | great | 02:16 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd-glib (focal-proposed/main) [1.57-0ubuntu2 => 1.57-0ubuntu3] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) | 02:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-lts (focal-proposed/main) [11.0.7+10-2ubuntu1 => 11.0.7+10-2ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 02:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: boost-defaults (focal-proposed/main) [1.71.0.0ubuntu1 => 1.71.0.0ubuntu2] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) | 03:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: keybinder-3.0 (focal-proposed/universe) [0.3.2-1 => 0.3.2-1ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio, xubuntu) | 03:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.0-0ubuntu1 => 3.36.0-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) | 04:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (focal-proposed/main) [67ubuntu20.04.3 => 67ubuntu20.04.4] (ubuntu-desktop) | 06:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mesa (focal-proposed/main) [20.0.4-1ubuntu1 => 20.0.4-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist, xorg) | 06:10 | |
| tjaalton | mesa ^ needs the llvm-10 sync | 06:10 |
| tjaalton | locutus_: now llvm-10 -4 isn't tagged ;) | 06:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26] | 06:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26] | 06:15 | |
| tjaalton | oh, mesa ftbfs on ppc64el on debian. that's just great | 06:16 |
| tjaalton | (because of llvm) | 06:16 |
| tjaalton | scratch that then | 06:16 |
| vorlon | xnox: so your livecd-rootfs is queue switches the desktop to use only generic-hwe-20.04 but I thought the plan was to offer both generic-hwe-20.04 and generic | 06:20 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glibc (focal-proposed/main) [2.31-0ubuntu8 => 2.31-0ubuntu9] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync) | 06:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd-glib [source] (focal-proposed) [1.57-0ubuntu3] | 06:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.6] | 06:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glibc [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.31-0ubuntu9] | 06:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted resource-agents [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.5.0-2ubuntu2] | 06:27 | |
| tjaalton | I'll upload a new mesa with just a couple of fixes in a bit | 06:27 |
| seb128 | hey there, could someone review/get in some of the pending desktop items? | 06:29 |
| seb128 | - glib2.0 first, it's a bugfix version and includes some fixes we would like to see in release, one being for a segfault that random apps are hitting (bug #1872153) | 06:30 |
| ubot5 | bug 1872153 in glib2.0 (Ubuntu) "SIGSEGV in g_source_set_ready_time()" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1872153 | 06:30 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (focal-proposed) [2:16.0.0~b3~git2020041516.5f42488a9a-0ubuntu1] | 06:30 | |
| seb128 | - gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock has some rls targetted fixes as well | 06:31 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libva (focal-proposed/universe) [2.7.0-1 => 2.7.0-2] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) (sync) | 06:31 | |
| seb128 | - and then pulseaudion evolution-data-server snapd-glib which have small but useful fixes | 06:31 |
| tjaalton | libva ^ has a fix for mapping the proper vaapi driver to use on current mesa | 06:31 |
| tjaalton | which uses 'iris' instead of 'i965' by default on intel | 06:32 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glib2.0 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.64.2-1~fakesync1] | 06:32 | |
| seb128 | thanks! | 06:34 |
| vorlon | seb128: I tried to review some of these and bounced off of the pulseaudio one, there's quite a long list of patches added without bug links so I wasn't comfortable with it | 06:34 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected debhelper [source] (focal-proposed) [13ubuntu1] | 06:35 | |
| vorlon | maybe it needs more explanation, or maybe it needs someone reviewing it not at 11:30pm | 06:35 |
| seb128 | vorlon, pulseaudio we ship a rc and looks like stable isn't going to be on time for focal so I went to git and cherry picked the pending commits that looked useful, I can reduce to only the important ones if you prefer | 06:35 |
| seb128 | right | 06:35 |
| seb128 | let's see what the europeans say | 06:35 |
| seb128 | vorlon, evolution-data-server and snapd-glib should be trivial, the first one has a patch cherry picked from git and the second one is just adding dh_translations to the build so we can translate it | 06:36 |
| vorlon | seb128: ah; an update to sync with current git would probably give me more confidence what no dependencies are missed from any of the cherry-picked patches | 06:36 |
| seb128 | vorlon, ok, feel free to reject and I will re-upload | 06:37 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: I wonder if we should blacklist the systemctl package in Ubuntu, or if we expect folks to actually use that | 06:38 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected pulseaudio [source] (focal-proposed) [1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3] | 06:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (focal-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu27] | 06:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debian-installer [source] (focal-proposed) [20101020ubuntu612] | 06:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-defaults [source] (focal-proposed) [2:1.13~1ubuntu2] | 06:42 | |
| jibel | vorlon, hi, https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-installer/ubiquity/+git/ubiquity/+merge/376815 is still needed? I'm asking because there is no task for ubiquity in the linked bug report and it's fix released | 06:42 |
| jibel | but not merged in ubiquity | 06:42 |
| vorlon | jibel: well, in light of LP: 1869187 the implementation needs fixing | 06:43 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1869187 in shim-signed (Ubuntu Focal) "mokutil ignores timeout parameter" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1869187 | 06:43 |
| vorlon | but yes, it is still important to get this done | 06:43 |
| vorlon | jibel: pushed a rebase + fix for LP: #1869187 | 06:48 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1869187 in shim-signed (Ubuntu Focal) "mokutil ignores timeout parameter" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1869187 | 06:48 |
| jibel | thanks, I'll test and merge it | 06:53 |
| vorlon | xnox: mentions of the community-maas seed still appear on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg | 06:55 |
| === slyon_ is now known as slyon | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution (focal-proposed/universe) [3.36.1-1 => 3.36.1-2] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin) (sync) | 07:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntukylin-default-settings (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04.1 => 20.04.2] (ubuntukylin) | 07:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mesa (focal-proposed/main) [20.0.4-1ubuntu1 => 20.0.4-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist, xorg) | 07:21 | |
| tjaalton | this ^ replaces the previous upload of mesa | 07:22 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution (focal-proposed/universe) [3.36.1-1 => 3.36.1-2] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin) (sync) | 07:26 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | tjaalton, we should ask sylvestre for that | 07:43 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.4-2 => 6.1.6-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 07:44 | |
| tjaalton | LocutusOfBorg: I did, he said it's mesa upstream bug | 07:44 |
| tjaalton | anyway, mesa migration to llvm-10 is a post-release thing now | 07:44 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-ext-pack [sync] (focal-proposed) [6.1.6-1] | 07:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.4-dfsg-4 => 6.1.6-dfsg-1] (ubuntu-cloud) (sync) | 07:44 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | please accept vbox, its a bugfix only release with 3d guest/host acceleration fixes | 07:45 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Changelog here the changelog | 07:45 |
| Laney | I'm thinking | 08:07 |
| Laney | this "upload, and then ping in the channel" thing that we have (no specific criticism of anyone) | 08:08 |
| Laney | maybe we should give out some advice about saying the same justification you give in here in the debian/changelog instead (or a bug) | 08:08 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (focal-proposed/main) [1:13.99.1-1ubuntu2 => 1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 08:09 | |
| seb128 | ^ reuploaded to match what Steve asked earlier, having a git cherrypick patch rather than individual commits | 08:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.661] | 08:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.12] | 08:12 | |
| seb128 | Laney, it makes sense imho to have the changelog describing enough to give a sense of the importance of the upload, it wouldn't hurt to recommend that yes | 08:15 |
| seb128 | (bit more problematic with syncs but at least doing it for uploads would be a positive step) | 08:16 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (focal-proposed/main) [0.98-0ubuntu4 => 0.99-0ubuntu1] (core) | 08:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected spirv-headers [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.5.1+git20200409-1] | 08:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected vulkan-loader [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.2.135.0-2] | 08:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected spirv-tools [sync] (focal-proposed) [2020.2-1] | 08:22 | |
| sil2100 | Laney, apw, vorlon: the last-minute barely-on-time netplan 0.99 uploaded ^ (we have an FFe for it) | 08:23 |
| Laney | not at all scary | 08:23 |
| sil2100 | I have test-built it and sanity tested it before uploading | 08:23 |
| sil2100 | That being said, we know how risky this is so both me and slyon will have eyes wide open for any regressions and ready for hotfix real quick | 08:24 |
| tjaalton | someone rejected vulkan-loader/spirv? | 08:24 |
| apw | not me | 08:25 |
| tjaalton | vulkan-tools & -validationlayers, and glslang need to be removed from proposed then | 08:26 |
| RikMills | who would be best to review (and maybe upload) a software-properties fix? | 08:26 |
| sil2100 | Not me as well, I'm busy trying not to blow up the whole world with this netplan thing | 08:26 |
| LocutusOfBorg | tjaalton, you just need to provide information there https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vulkan-loader/+bug/1871754 | 08:26 |
| RikMills | lol. np | 08:26 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1871754 in vulkan-validationlayers (Ubuntu) "FFE: update vulkan to 1.2.135" [Undecided,New] | 08:26 |
| Laney | RikMills: try in #ubuntu-devel, no need for release team for that | 08:27 |
| tjaalton | LocutusOfBorg: ah there it was | 08:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-noto-color-emoji [sync] (focal-proposed) [0~20200408-1] | 08:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jackd2 (focal-proposed/main) [1.9.12~dfsg-2ubuntu1 => 1.9.12~dfsg-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 08:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected pyhamcrest [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.9.0-3] | 08:31 | |
| seb128 | sil2100, we didn't get langpacks refresh this week, is that cron job still not working? | 08:33 |
| ginggs | would someone please 'force-reset-test octave-communications/1.2.2-1build1/ppc64el' ? octave-communications was removed on ppc64el | 08:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected inkscape [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.92.5-1] | 08:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nginx [source] (focal-proposed) [1.17.10-0ubuntu1] | 08:37 | |
| sil2100 | seb128: the instance is inaccessible, probably due being out of free space - I'm trying to get it back with IS since yesterday, but anyway, me and Gunnar decided we'll just do the full refresh today/tomorrow instead | 08:39 |
| sil2100 | seb128: since we always refresh the base translations right before release | 08:40 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (focal-proposed/main) [0.98.7 => 0.98.8] (core) | 08:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jtreg [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.0-b01-2.1] | 08:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vlc [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.0.9.2-1] | 08:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libinput [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.15.5-1] | 08:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted latte-dock [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.11-0ubuntu1] | 08:44 | |
| seb128 | sil2100, right, would just have been nice to be able to test/spot bugs before the base refresh... | 08:47 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-data-server [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.36.1-2] | 08:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-intel [sync] (focal-proposed) [2:2.99.917+git20200226-1] | 08:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted modemmanager [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.12.8-1] | 08:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-input-evdev [sync] (focal-proposed) [1:2.10.6-2] | 08:49 | |
| xnox | vorlon: re:community-maas => horum will look | 08:53 |
| xnox | vorlon: debhelper diff is tiny, the biggest gain is marking lever 13 stable (the package version number change => debhelper-compat v13 provides is there) | 08:54 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted enigmail [sync] (focal-proposed) [2:2.1.6+ds1-1] | 08:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-deva-extra [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.0-5] | 08:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-guru-extra [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.0-5] | 08:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-beng-extra [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.0-7] | 08:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-orya-extra [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.0-6] | 08:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-gujr-extra [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.0.1-1] | 08:55 | |
| xnox | vorlon: in germinate-output community* things are empty. horum. | 08:55 |
| tjaalton | Laney: thanks for pointing out that vulkan ffe didn't have u-r subscribed, the description is updated now | 09:02 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntukylin-default-settings [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.2] | 09:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jackd2 [source] (focal-proposed) [1.9.12~dfsg-2ubuntu2] | 09:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xfwm4 [source] (focal-proposed) [4.14.1-0ubuntu1] | 09:07 | |
| locutus_ | wgrant, what happened to the riscv64 machine? | 09:10 |
| locutus_ | [BUILDING] Currently building on riscv64-qemu-lcy01-002 (8C, 20GiB) on riscv64-qemu-lcy01-002 (8C, 20GiB) Cancel build | 09:10 |
| locutus_ | is it building twice on the same machine? network error? | 09:10 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libxcomposite (focal-proposed/main) [1:0.4.5-0ubuntu1 => 1:0.4.5-1] (core, i386-whitelist, xorg) (sync) | 09:10 | |
| wgrant | locutus_: A display artifact from the surgery to revive it | 09:11 |
| wgrant | A harmless mistake on my part | 09:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libxdamage (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.1.5-1 => 1:1.1.5-2] (core, i386-whitelist, xorg) (sync) | 09:11 | |
| locutus_ | if its harmless, its ok then :) | 09:12 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libxfixes (focal-proposed/main) [1:5.0.3-1 => 1:5.0.3-2] (core, i386-whitelist, xorg) (sync) | 09:12 | |
| Laney | 🗲🗲🗲🗲🗲🗲🗲🗲🗲🗲🗲🗲🗲🗲🗲🗲 | 09:12 |
| Laney | think I understood what the BREAK_ARCHES problem is | 09:12 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libxres (focal-proposed/main) [2:1.2.0-3 => 2:1.2.0-4] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop, xorg) (sync) | 09:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-vmware (focal-proposed/main) [1:13.3.0-2build1 => 1:13.3.0-3] (desktop-core, xorg) (sync) | 09:13 | |
| Laney | the package gets rejected by the autopkgtest policy | 09:14 |
| sil2100 | apw: since Laney is probably deep in britney debugging now, maybe you would like to review the big netplan.io 0.99 FFe'd upload in the queue? | 09:18 |
| locutus_ | sil2100, I would appreciate a virtualbox review, its made of bugfixes on the guest 3d acceleration parts, something we really would like to have in our iso... | 09:19 |
| locutus_ | I can privately say something more if you are interested in what happened | 09:20 |
| Laney | everything will be reviewed | 09:21 |
| Laney | you might have noticed that I did a ton this morning already :-) | 09:21 |
| locutus_ | yep, and thanks for that! | 09:22 |
| sil2100 | locutus_: yeah, we're doing our best o/ | 09:22 |
| locutus_ | sil is usually doing a great job on vbox part, this is why I ping directly :) | 09:22 |
| locutus_ | also, if you want to accept llvm-toolchain-10, there is a block-proposed bug already, that makes sure riscv64 finishes before going in release | 09:23 |
| locutus_ | it takes days to build, and it contains s390x fixes for mesa builds... | 09:23 |
| locutus_ | otherwise I can do in bileto and publish when the riscv64 build is fine, just let me know if you prefer this way | 09:23 |
| cpaelzer | SRU Team (and or rbasak who reviewed the last one) - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chrony/+bug/1872183/comments/17 | 09:30 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1872183 in chrony (Ubuntu) "package chrony 3.2-4ubuntu4.2 failed to install/upgrade: installed chrony package post-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1" [Undecided,In progress] | 09:30 |
| cpaelzer | the new chrony in bionic-unapproved will fix the test issues, I'd appreciate if it could get into bionic-proposed asap | 09:31 |
| Laney | locutus_: yeah bileto makes me more comfortable tbh | 09:33 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected llvm-toolchain-10 [sync] (focal-proposed) [1:10.0.0-4] | 09:33 | |
| locutus_ | Laney, do we have riscv64 on bileto? | 09:35 |
| locutus_ | seems like we have it, I just opened one without | 09:36 |
| locutus_ | btw wrt inkscape delta, the ppc64el can be dropped, the python move not, mapreri will upload in debian later today | 09:38 |
| locutus_ | https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+build/19167017 | 09:38 |
| locutus_ | (but a plain sync of inkscape works with virtual python-dev provides) | 09:41 |
| locutus_ | wgrant, are you sure the build isn't stuck? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-10/1:10.0.0-3/+build/19151969 the changelog looks always the same... | 09:49 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chrony (bionic-proposed/main) [3.2-4ubuntu4.3 => 3.2-4ubuntu4.4] (ubuntu-server) | 09:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gtk+3.0 (focal-proposed/main) [3.24.17-3ubuntu1 => 3.24.18-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) | 09:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected evolution [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.36.1-2] | 10:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (focal-proposed/main) [0.98.7 => 0.98.9] (core) | 10:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-1.14 (focal-proposed/universe) [1.14.2-1 => 1.14.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 10:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-1.14 [source] (focal-proposed) [1.14.2-1ubuntu1] | 10:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gpodder (focal-proposed/universe) [3.10.13-1 => 3.10.15-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 10:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gpodder [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.10.15-1] | 10:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (focal-proposed/main) [1:3.36.1-1ubuntu4 => 1:3.36.1-1ubuntu5] (ubuntu-desktop) | 10:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox [sync] (focal-proposed) [6.1.6-dfsg-1] | 10:47 | |
| * sil2100 winks on the netplan.io upload in the queue | 10:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: smb4k (focal-proposed/universe) [3.0.4-0ubuntu1 => 3.0.4-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 11:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted smb4k [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.0.4-1] | 11:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gtk+3.0 [source] (focal-proposed) [3.24.18-1ubuntu1] | 11:04 | |
| locutus_ | is it possible to kick out golang-github-census-instrumentation-opencensus-proto from focal? new package, autopkgtest failure/flaky in debian too, not in testing, blocking golang-goprotobuf migration | 11:24 |
| locutus_ | also, please convert the camitk hint into a forget everywhere except amd64 or bump it... | 11:25 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g_ | ||
| mwhudson | sadface? https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu-server/focal/daily-live-20200416.log | 11:27 |
| sil2100 | ;/ | 11:31 |
| Laney | There was some maintenance in Launchpad and several in-progress builds failed like that | 11:31 |
| cjwatson | Right, we were switching DB master | 11:31 |
| cjwatson | Now on full SSD | 11:32 |
| seb128 | \o/ | 11:38 |
| mwhudson | Laney: so what happens, start another build? | 11:41 |
| mwhudson | actually i am going to bed | 11:41 |
| Laney | mwhudson: Yeah feel free to retry | 11:42 |
| mwhudson | Laney: don't have the power, i don't think | 11:42 |
| cjwatson | (standby isn't on full SSD yet, but hopefully ASAP) | 11:42 |
| Laney | I'm stupid and deleted the mails so don't have a list of the failures to hand | 11:42 |
| mwhudson | i only care about focal live server | 11:42 |
| Laney | sil2100: I'll look at netplan.io, finished with proposed-migration now I think | 11:45 |
| Laney | if you wanted to be nice, you could review what I came up with there 😇😇😇😇😇😇 | 11:45 |
| sil2100 | \o/ thank you! I'm checking now if all the non-langpack translations have been done | 11:46 |
| sil2100 | Sure, do you have an MP? Or did you commit already? | 11:46 |
| Laney | just writing commit messages | 11:46 |
| Laney | ah wait, need to take care of one more case (missing builds) | 11:49 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fprintd (focal-proposed/main) [1.90.1-1 => 1.90.1-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core) | 11:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gsettings-desktop-schemas (focal-proposed/main) [3.35.91-0ubuntu1 => 3.36.0-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) | 11:59 | |
| sil2100 | Laney: ok, this was supposed to be an MP but I prematurely pushed it to trunk: can I finalize and release https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/update-manager/main/revision/2879 ? | 12:14 |
| sil2100 | Laney: it's a bump of the dates following the exact same schema as for bionic: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/update-manager/bionic/revision/2826 | 12:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted chrony [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.2-4ubuntu4.4] | 12:15 | |
| sil2100 | We probably want to make it dynamic, using distro-info-data, but now is not the time | 12:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: inkscape (focal-proposed/universe) [0.92.4-5ubuntu5 => 0.92.5-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntustudio) | 12:15 | |
| Laney | sil2100: Looks OK to me, but marcustomlinson has a MP up which we should include in the next upload: https://code.launchpad.net/~marcustomlinson/update-manager/update-manager/+merge/382410 | 12:16 |
| sil2100 | Laney: would you like me to review it and merge it? | 12:18 |
| sil2100 | I need to help out with lunch now, but I can do that when I'm back | 12:19 |
| Laney | sil2100: If you're up for it, feel free | 12:19 |
| Laney | here's my britney2-ubuntu MP too: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/+git/britney2-ubuntu/+merge/382422 | 12:19 |
| Laney | should unblock some items like remmina | 12:19 |
| sil2100 | Ok, will do those two shortly :) | 12:20 |
| * Laney lunches too, then netplan time | 12:21 | |
| kanashiro | could someone please take a look at this MP to unblock mysql-8.0? https://code.launchpad.net/~lucaskanashiro/britney/hint-update-mysql-connector-c++/+merge/382246 | 12:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fonts-monoid (focal-proposed/universe) [0.61-2 => 0.61-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 13:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-monoid [source] (focal-proposed) [0.61-2ubuntu1] | 13:21 | |
| Laney | sil2100: nonon | 14:00 |
| Laney | you're leaking symbols in this libnetplan0, e.g. you have one from GLib in there | 14:00 |
| Laney | oh no that's not true | 14:01 |
| Laney | but you are exporting a g_... function on the ABI which seems wrong | 14:01 |
| sil2100 | Which one? We actually define one symbol that looks like a GLib symbol ;p | 14:01 |
| Laney | this ABI seems a bit wonky | 14:02 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.620.2] | 14:03 | |
| Laney | I think you should scope them all with netplan_ prefixes | 14:04 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1018.19~18.04.1] (no packageset) | 14:08 | |
| sil2100 | Yeah, I guess the library part is not ideal yet, it's used only by netplan and one NM plugin (unreleased anywhere) | 14:09 |
| sil2100 | So technically just by netplan | 14:09 |
| sil2100 | We might look into namespacing it better | 14:10 |
| Laney | you've got functions in there with *really* generic names like "parser_error" and "is_ip4_address" though :S | 14:13 |
| sil2100 | But I'd of course target that for uh, 0.100 ? Or whatever version we'll have next | 14:14 |
| sil2100 | We might drop most of those symbols once we flesh out the other work | 14:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ddtp-translations (focal-proposed/universe) [20200110.1 => 20200416.1] (no packageset) | 14:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ddtp-translations [source] (focal-proposed) [20200416.1] | 14:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shadow (focal-proposed/main) [1:4.8.1-1ubuntu4 => 1:4.8.1-1ubuntu5] (core, i386-whitelist) | 14:18 | |
| sil2100 | Oh, yay, mvo uploaded ddtp-translations \o/ | 14:19 |
| didrocks | I thought this enthousiast was for my shadow upload :p | 14:20 |
| sil2100 | Laney: uh, ok, I wrapped my head around that MP of yours and approved, just some comment typos | 14:20 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zsys (focal-proposed/main) [0.4.4 => 0.4.5] (no packageset) | 14:20 | |
| Laney | merci | 14:22 |
| sil2100 | Was surprised it actually didn't work like that before already | 14:23 |
| Laney | apw: around? wanting a second opinion on netplan.io, see my above comments (weird ABI, sil2100 wants us to overlook that) | 14:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-budgie-meta (focal-proposed/universe) [0.64 => 0.65] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-budgie) | 14:23 | |
| Laney | + self.log('Tests for %s: %s' % (source_name, tests)) | 14:24 |
| Laney | WOH | 14:24 |
| Laney | that's not supposed to be there /o\ | 14:24 |
| sil2100 | I thought it's additional logging | 14:24 |
| Laney | yeah just added it while developing | 14:24 |
| sil2100 | Laney, apw: yeah, I'd appreciate letting that through, mostly because in theory it should be harmless - realistically there should be no consumers of this library, we actually split it out only for the NM read-write plugin, which is why the API isn't super well designed | 14:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adduser (focal-proposed/main) [3.118ubuntu1 => 3.118ubuntu2] (core) | 14:28 | |
| sil2100 | Guess the most interesting symbols are the ones with netplan_* anyway | 14:30 |
| sil2100 | We probably don't need to export any others, but uh... | 14:30 |
| bdmurray | sil2100, Laney: What packages can I be reviewing in the Focal queue? | 14:36 |
| seb128 | could those desktop items get reviewed? they have fixes we would like to see in the release: pulseaudio software-properties gnome-control-center fprintd gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock | 14:36 |
| seb128 | bdmurray, hey, good timing :p | 14:36 |
| bdmurray | From your perspective! | 14:37 |
| bdmurray | ;-) | 14:37 |
| seb128 | haha | 14:37 |
| seb128 | right :) | 14:37 |
| tdaitx | would someone be so kind as to approve openjdk-lts in focal? | 14:40 |
| sil2100 | We'll get to it soon ;) | 14:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ovn-octavia-provider (focal-proposed/universe) [0.0.1~git2020022414.000049c-0ubuntu1 => 0.1.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 14:42 | |
| doko | tdaitx, sil2100: please no, there's one package waiting in -proposed, and I already had prepared a build for the remaining issue | 14:43 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ovn-octavia-provider [source] (focal-proposed) [0.1.0-0ubuntu1] | 14:44 | |
| tdaitx | doko: is there one more issue than the one you pointed out yesterday and asked me to fix? | 14:44 |
| sil2100 | Should we reject? | 14:44 |
| doko | please do, yes. | 14:44 |
| doko | tdaitx: I asked you to apply it for the security updates, and that I would prepare the upload for focal | 14:45 |
| tdaitx | doko ok, I mixed things up then, only thing is that my security updates "backported" this last upload, including version | 14:46 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (bionic-proposed/main) [1.173.17 => 1.173.18] (core, kernel) | 14:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (xenial-proposed/main) [1.157.22 => 1.157.23] (core, kernel) | 14:47 | |
| tdaitx | doko: please just make sure focal lands a higher version than 2ubuntu2 | 14:48 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected openjdk-lts [source] (focal-proposed) [11.0.7+10-2ubuntu2] | 14:48 | |
| sil2100 | apw, Laney: I'd really appreciate a go/no-go for netplan before final-freeze - expecially that we're so late with everything, I'd like to have potentially more time for fixing issues in case those pop up ;) | 14:55 |
| apw | sil2100, sorry, i'll look at the new enw | 14:55 |
| sil2100 | I know the library part is not ideal - we'll make it better, I promise | 14:58 |
| apw | sil2100, tell me the one thing this brings that we cannot live without | 15:03 |
| sil2100 | apw: a lot, we'd need the libnetplan stuff for our ongoing uc20 NM read-write plugin work, and the new SR-IOV feature is our roadmap item that we want to release | 15:03 |
| Laney | sil2100: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/FPRdPXRfds/ there's maybe a start of some visibility work | 15:03 |
| Laney | but if apw's ok-ish then I don't want to block | 15:04 |
| sil2100 | apw: and all the other features are also basically needed for the ongoing NM plugin work | 15:05 |
| sil2100 | Basically, we're trying to release this as it's necessary, we wouldn't release it if it only had things 'good to have' ;) | 15:05 |
| sil2100 | (not this late in the cycle) | 15:05 |
| apw | Laney, i assume that would stop all these seemingly internal entries appearing in the .so list | 15:05 |
| sil2100 | Laney: oh, fancy | 15:06 |
| Laney | I can't say if that's enough for this plugin though | 15:06 |
| Laney | but yeah that's the idea | 15:06 |
| sil2100 | I don't know how much we'd actually need | 15:06 |
| Laney | bdmurray: sorry forgot to reply to you | 15:07 |
| sil2100 | I could distro-patch something based on Laney's suggestion, but as said, not sure | 15:07 |
| Laney | I'm reviewing from the end | 15:08 |
| Laney | so you can start somewhere in the middle if you want | 15:08 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted thunar [source] (focal-proposed) [1.8.14-0ubuntu1] | 15:08 | |
| bdmurray | Laney: okay, its gonna be an hour before I can start | 15:08 |
| bdmurray | Laney: Do you know anything about livecd image building times? I added some info to the doc | 15:08 |
| apw | Laney, 99% of this diff appears to be changes due to the prefix on every single constant changing | 15:08 |
| sil2100 | apw, Laney: my personal recommendation would be leaving it as is and then, calmly, flesh out which symbols are needed and sort out the header situation as well with a future revision | 15:08 |
| sil2100 | (and bumping the soname of course) | 15:09 |
| xnox | Laney: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu/focal/daily-live-20200416.log looks sad | 15:11 |
| Laney | xnox: same as the earlier failures | 15:12 |
| Laney | can respin once your livecd-rootfs is published | 15:12 |
| Laney | bdmurray: They reverted the hack/workaround so it might be slow again, there's a fix proposed but not reviewed yet, will put the hack back if necessary next week | 15:13 |
| xnox | Laney: perfect | 15:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons (focal-proposed/main) [19.10.2+git20200223-1 => 20.04.0-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync) | 15:19 | |
| apw | Laney, i see nothing horrific in this thing other than it being too big to review line by line; if it does what is claimed i think it is ok, and it does at least have tests. we should insist on sil2000 doing the interface review | 15:20 |
| Laney | apw: Right, I wasn't reviewing the upstream stuff because it's too big! | 15:22 |
| Laney | I don't think I would want to link against this library so yeah good if there's a commitment to fix it | 15:22 |
| sil2100 | Laney, apw: I pinky-promise to fix this (since now we have slyon to help out!) | 15:25 |
| vorlon | xnox: tiny debhelper diffs can have large effects on buildability, I'm standing by my nack of this | 15:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1020.21~18.04.1] (no packageset) | 15:26 | |
| vorlon | juliank: btw should we have another shim-signed upload for the new (but unreleasable) shim with a roll-up of the packaging changes? | 15:31 |
| vorlon | juliank: or should we just leave things in the current state until we have a new signed shim | 15:31 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: haskell-stack (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.1-3build2 => 1.9.3.1-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 15:32 | |
| juliank | vorlon: doesn't really matter much i guess | 15:32 |
| juliank | vorlon: Should merge focal branch into master though | 15:32 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted haskell-stack [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.9.3.1-1] | 15:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: thunderbird (focal-proposed/main) [1:68.7.0+build1-0ubuntu1 => 1:68.7.0+build1-0ubuntu2] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop) | 15:33 | |
| seb128 | is there anything we can do to help desktop items to be reviewed? | 15:35 |
| sil2100 | seb128: I'll get to those shortly, we're in a meeting right now | 15:35 |
| seb128 | vorlon, I reuploaded pulseaudio with one git cherry pick but it didn't get reviewed again, if you want to maybe have another look? | 15:35 |
| seb128 | sil2100, ok, thanks | 15:35 |
| Laney | seb128: there's no problem, we're just working our way through everything | 15:35 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: php7.4 (focal-proposed/main) [7.4.3-4ubuntu1 => 7.4.3-4ubuntu2] (i386-whitelist) | 15:36 | |
| seb128 | Laney, freeze is today and I need to call it a day in not long, I'm just trying to make sure I'm still around if there are questions/comments and that we don't miss the freeze | 15:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted po4a [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.57-2] | 15:36 | |
| Laney | you won't, things that were uploaded before the freeze will be reviewed | 15:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kylin-nm [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.2.4-1] | 15:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (focal-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu1] | 15:37 | |
| seb128 | k, fair enough | 15:37 |
| sil2100 | \o/ | 15:37 |
| sil2100 | Laney, apw: thank you for accepting netplan! I know it wasn't an easy choice, we'll be sure to deal with any consequences swiftly | 15:38 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted boost-defaults [source] (focal-proposed) [1.71.0.0ubuntu2] | 15:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted keybinder-3.0 [source] (focal-proposed) [0.3.2-1ubuntu1] | 15:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-software [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.0-0ubuntu2] | 15:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mesa [source] (focal-proposed) [20.0.4-2ubuntu1] | 15:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock [source] (focal-proposed) [67ubuntu20.04.4] | 15:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu1] (core) | 15:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu1] (core) | 15:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu1] (core) | 15:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu1] (core) | 15:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [armhf] (focal-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu1] (core) | 15:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libva [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.7.0-2] | 15:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.36.1-2] | 15:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted software-properties [source] (focal-proposed) [0.98.8] | 15:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libgd2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.2.5-5.2ubuntu1 => 2.2.5-5.2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 15:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxcomposite [sync] (focal-proposed) [1:0.4.5-1] | 15:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxfixes [sync] (focal-proposed) [1:5.0.3-2] | 15:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxdamage [sync] (focal-proposed) [1:1.1.5-2] | 15:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxres [sync] (focal-proposed) [2:1.2.0-4] | 15:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-vmware [sync] (focal-proposed) [1:13.3.0-3] | 15:49 | |
| oSoMoN | dear release team, please consider accepting thunderbird 1:68.7.0+build1-0ubuntu2 into focal-proposed, it's removing a patch that we don't want to carry for 5 more years (was done in firefox a while ago but overlooked for thunderbird, better late than never…) | 15:49 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-stack [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.9.3.1-1] (no packageset) | 15:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fprintd [source] (focal-proposed) [1.90.1-1ubuntu1] | 15:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gsettings-desktop-schemas [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.0-1ubuntu1] | 15:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-control-center [source] (focal-proposed) [1:3.36.1-1ubuntu5] | 15:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-stack [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.9.3.1-1] (no packageset) | 15:53 | |
| Laney | ok I'm done with the queue for today probably | 15:54 |
| Laney | leave the rest of the fun for bdmurray | 15:54 |
| tdaitx | vorlon: libgd2 no change rebuild is in the unapproved queue | 15:54 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04.0-1] | 15:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted thunderbird [source] (focal-proposed) [1:68.7.0+build1-0ubuntu2] | 15:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted inkscape [source] (focal-proposed) [0.92.5-1ubuntu1] | 15:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-budgie-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [0.65] | 15:55 | |
| oSoMoN | thanks! | 15:56 |
| sil2100 | Laney: thanks! | 15:56 |
| Laney | tdaitx: btw, would have been possible for me to accept if the changelog said what the rebuild was for | 15:58 |
| Laney | but as it stood I didn't have enough information so left it | 15:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libgd2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.2.5-5.2ubuntu2] | 16:01 | |
| tdaitx | Laney: ouch, sorry for that, it makes sense... I can't really remember seeing useful changelog entries for no change rebuilds, so I didn't stop to consider doing differently | 16:01 |
| vorlon | Laney: yeah we had out-of-band context, sorry | 16:01 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pulseaudio [source] (focal-proposed) [1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3] | 16:01 | |
| vorlon | Laney: it was because the previous build was uploaded to the security pocket, which means riscv64 can't be built | 16:01 |
| vorlon | tdaitx: mine always say why I'm rebuilding :) | 16:02 |
| tdaitx | I clearly haven't been looking at enough of them | 16:02 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-stack [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.9.3.1-1] (no packageset) | 16:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [riscv64] (focal-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu1] (core) | 16:03 | |
| tdaitx | or I have only looked at the wrong ones for some reason | 16:03 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.6 => 1:20.04.7] (core) | 16:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted netplan.io [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu1] | 16:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted netplan.io [armhf] (focal-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu1] | 16:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted netplan.io [riscv64] (focal-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu1] | 16:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted netplan.io [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu1] | 16:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted netplan.io [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu1] | 16:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted netplan.io [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu1] | 16:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-castellan (focal-proposed/main) [3.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 3.0.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 16:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-keystoneclient (focal-proposed/main) [1:3.22.0-0ubuntu2 => 1:4.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 16:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (focal-proposed/main) [20.1-10-g71af48df-0ubuntu4 => 20.1-10-g71af48df-0ubuntu5] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud) | 16:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-heatclient (focal-proposed/main) [2.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 16:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-novaclient (focal-proposed/main) [2:16.0.0-0ubuntu2 => 2:17.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 16:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-manilaclient (focal-proposed/main) [2.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 16:11 | |
| Odd_Bloke | Hey release team, ^ that cloud-init upload fixes a test failure that we only saw building on Launchpad once the package was accepted. I've done a test build in a PPA to confirm that this version of the package builds successfully on a Launchpad builder. | 16:12 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireguard-linux-compat [sync] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.20200401-1ubuntu1~19.10.1] | 16:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireguard [sync] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.20200319-1ubuntu1~19.10.1] | 16:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-glanceclient (focal-proposed/main) [1:3.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:3.1.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 16:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.policy (focal-proposed/main) [3.0.3-0ubuntu1 => 3.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 16:14 | |
| sil2100 | Odd_Bloke: looking | 16:18 |
| * sil2100 is waiting for the debdiff | 16:19 | |
| Laney | vorlon: by the way, I merged some changes to britney2-ubuntu earlier to have the autopkgtest policy not wait for uninstallables / missing builds on non-adt or BREAK arches | 16:19 |
| Laney | that should *not* by itself cause anything to migrate when it wouldn't have before | 16:22 |
| Laney | but just have test results for those items | 16:22 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xubuntu-default-settings [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.3] | 16:23 | |
| Odd_Bloke | sil2100: It's there now: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/474899794/cloud-init_20.1-10-g71af48df-0ubuntu4_20.1-10-g71af48df-0ubuntu5.diff.gz (Thanks for looking! :) | 16:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: barbican (focal-proposed/main) [1:10.0.0~b2~git2020020508.7b14d983-0ubuntu2 => 1:10.0.0~b2~git2020020508.7b14d983-0ubuntu3] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 16:25 | |
| sil2100 | Odd_Bloke: yeah, saw it! | 16:26 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adduser [source] (focal-proposed) [3.118ubuntu2] | 16:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zsys [source] (focal-proposed) [0.4.5] | 16:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shadow [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.8.1-1ubuntu5] | 16:26 | |
| sil2100 | (and now accepted) | 16:26 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [20.1-10-g71af48df-0ubuntu5] | 16:26 | |
| Odd_Bloke | \o/ | 16:27 |
| sil2100 | I think I'm done with the queue for today as well | 16:28 |
| powersj | Odd_Bloke, sil2100 thanks! | 16:30 |
| sil2100 | yw! | 16:30 |
| sil2100 | Ok, guess it's time to get the langpack export prepared | 16:32 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-stack [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.9.3.1-1] (no packageset) | 16:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.7] | 16:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1020.21~18.04.1] | 16:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1018.19~18.04.1] | 16:50 | |
| Laney | bdmurray: did you want to do the final freeze announcement later? | 17:00 |
| bdmurray | Laney: later being when? | 17:01 |
| Laney | 21:00 UTC is the usual time | 17:01 |
| Laney | so depending on how precise you want to be, then or then abouts :-) | 17:02 |
| jfh | hi - I assumed that there will be a new daily-live image in pending today - one with timestamp Apr-16 -- it's usually there at this time of the day, any ideas why it's not there today? | 17:02 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-stack [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.9.3.1-1] | 17:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-stack [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.9.3.1-1] | 17:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-stack [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.9.3.1-1] | 17:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-stack [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.9.3.1-1] | 17:03 | |
| Laney | jfh: There was Launchpad maintenance earlier and a lot of in-progress image builds got abnormally terminated | 17:03 |
| jfh | Laney: ah, didn't know - so maybe better to wait until tomorrow ... | 17:04 |
| Laney | If you particularly need it then someone could request a rebuild, but otherwise yeah I expect tomorrow's builds to complete normally | 17:04 |
| Laney | that'll have to be someone else | 17:05 |
| * Laney goes away o/ | 17:05 | |
| jfh | nah - waiting for another day is still okay - just wondered ... | 17:05 |
| sil2100 | bdmurray: so do you want to do it or should I? | 17:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cbp2make (focal-proposed/universe) [147+dfsg-2build1 => 147+dfsg-3] (no packageset) (sync) | 17:07 | |
| bdmurray | sil2100: I can do it if you don't want to stick around. | 17:07 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cbp2make [sync] (focal-proposed) [147+dfsg-3] | 17:07 | |
| sil2100 | bdmurray: we can battle over it when the time comes | 17:12 |
| bdmurray | 💪 | 17:13 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: singularity (focal-proposed/universe) [0.30c-1 => 1.0b1-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 17:32 | |
| vorlon | Laney: autopkgtest policy> thanks, sounds like just what we want | 17:32 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted singularity [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.0b1-2] | 17:32 | |
| vorlon | Laney: ah, it seems you've added riscv64 to the arches in britney.conf, is that just for testing or does that impact the production configs? I expect that breaks the britney runs for stable series by adding a non-existent arch to the config? | 17:43 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted software-properties [source] (focal-proposed) [0.98.9] | 17:43 | |
| vorlon | Laney: well, code/b2/britney.conf.ubuntu.eoan at least looks sane, so I guess things are fixed up appropriately somewhere :) | 17:44 |
| vorlon | wgrant: is https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-10/1:10.0.0-3/+build/19151969 hung or are logs just really, really slow to update here | 17:48 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.7 => 1:20.04.8] (core) | 18:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-castellan [source] (focal-proposed) [3.0.1-0ubuntu1] | 18:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-keystoneclient [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.0.0-0ubuntu1] | 18:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-heatclient [source] (focal-proposed) [2.1.0-0ubuntu1] | 18:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: postfix (focal-proposed/main) [3.4.10-1 => 3.4.10-1ubuntu1] (core) | 19:02 | |
| mwhudson | can we get the focal live server iso built? | 19:28 |
| mwhudson | last night's failed and i really want to test one that's core18 based | 19:28 |
| mwhudson | vorlon, sil2100: ^ | 19:28 |
| sil2100 | mwhudson: ok | 19:32 |
| Laney | mwhudson: I'll trigger one (done) | 19:33 |
| mwhudson | Laney, sil2100: thanks | 19:33 |
| Laney | vorlon: The live configs are manually maintained afaik, but that unversioned one is used by the testsuite | 19:33 |
| sil2100 | Oh that Laney snatching stuff from under my feet! | 19:33 |
| Laney | yeah I just wanted the ISO tracker karma | 19:34 |
| sil2100 | Oh yes, we all want that delicious karma! | 19:37 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (focal-proposed/universe) [1:4.0.1-0ubuntu2 => 1:4.0.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server) | 19:55 | |
| rbalint | bdmurray, ok, i found why systemd-timesyncd gets removed on upgrade, it is because it is in minimal task | 20:01 |
| rbalint | bdmurray, where can we change the minimal task? seems not in ubuntu-meta | 20:01 |
| rbalint | vorlon,^? | 20:01 |
| bdmurray | rbalint: it == systemd-timesyncd? | 20:05 |
| rbalint | bdmurray, yes | 20:05 |
| rbalint | LP: #1872902 | 20:08 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1872902 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Focal) "Upgrade to Focal now removes chrony" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1872902 | 20:08 |
| bdmurray | well then I don't seem to know the answer :-| | 20:08 |
| rbalint | bdmurray, thanks, i feel much better now :-) | 20:08 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.1-3ubuntu1 => 3.36.1-3ubuntu2] (desktop-core, desktop-extra) | 20:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pop-gtk-theme (focal-proposed/universe) [5.0.0~1576602011~19.10~7760154~ubuntu2 => 5.2.0~1586289568~20.04~f35b83b~ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 20:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pop-gtk-theme [source] (focal-proposed) [5.2.0~1586289568~20.04~f35b83b~ubuntu1] | 20:13 | |
| rbalint | cjwatson, could you please help us out, how is systemd-timesynd added to the minimal task? | 20:14 |
| mwhudson | rbalint: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu.focal/minimal <- because systemd depends on it? | 20:16 |
| mwhudson | although it's systemd-timesyncd | time-daemon | 20:16 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-manilaclient [source] (focal-proposed) [2.1.0-0ubuntu1] | 20:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pop-icon-theme (focal-proposed/universe) [2.1.0~1571158475~19.10~6bf9347 => 2.1.0~1583343731~20.04~11f18cb~ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 20:19 | |
| rbalint | mwhudson, i suspect that's the (wrong) cause, but why is anything added that's being depended on? | 20:19 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pop-icon-theme [source] (focal-proposed) [2.1.0~1583343731~20.04~11f18cb~ubuntu1] | 20:20 | |
| rbalint | mwhudson, bdmurray or u-r-u should not mark the packages in the seed, just the meta package ubuntu-minimal to install | 20:21 |
| mwhudson | hrm | 20:21 |
| juliank | rbalint, mwhudson seed is expanded recursively afaiui, and it will pick the real option if given real | provider, until you seed a provider explicitly | 20:22 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (focal-proposed/main) [1:4.2-3ubuntu4 => 1:4.2-3ubuntu5] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 20:23 | |
| juliank | rbalint, mwhudson Now, the reason to install all packages in the seed is that it's more consistent | 20:23 |
| juliank | e.g. now machines get upgraded to systemd-timesyncd, instead of having any random time-darmon | 20:23 |
| rbalint | juliank, well i'd argue that it is also wrong, consistently :-) | 20:23 |
| mwhudson | i get confused about which seed is which | 20:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (focal-proposed/main) [6.0.0-0ubuntu6 => 6.0.0-0ubuntu7] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 20:24 | |
| cpaelzer | hi release team, after quite a bunch of extra verifications I have put qemu and libvirt into focal-unapproved and wanted to ask to accept that before the final freeze happens | 20:24 |
| cpaelzer | In case it is needed, the referenced bugs and the merge proposals that you can reach from there have plenty of information. | 20:24 |
| juliank | rbalint: I'd argue the easiest way to work around is to add a blacklist of stuff we don't want to explictly replace | 20:24 |
| cpaelzer | bdmurray: sil2100: vorlon: apw: stgraber: ^^ | 20:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: heat-dashboard (focal-proposed/universe) [2.1.0~git2020021314.7842190-0ubuntu1 => 2.1.0~git2020032615.7842190-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 20:25 | |
| cpaelzer | the uploads also include CVE fixes that mdeslaur assked me to add to focal | 20:25 |
| rbalint | juliank, yes, it is easy | 20:25 |
| juliank | rbalint: now, we do need dependencies expanded in the tasks, otherwise, installing tasks becomes unpredictable | 20:26 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted heat-dashboard [source] (focal-proposed) [2.1.0~git2020032615.7842190-0ubuntu1] | 20:26 | |
| juliank | Which can be a problem | 20:26 |
| sil2100 | cpaelzer: looking | 20:27 |
| cpaelzer | ok sil2100, let me know if there is anything | 20:29 |
| cpaelzer | thanks in advance | 20:29 |
| juliank | We had a related issue when apport depended on x-terminal-emulator, and germinate expanded that to terminator on i386, and that popped up in component mismatches :) | 20:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.2-3ubuntu5] | 20:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (focal-proposed) [6.0.0-0ubuntu7] | 20:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mutter [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.1-3ubuntu2] | 20:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted postfix [source] (focal-proposed) [3.4.10-1ubuntu1] | 20:31 | |
| stgraber | bdmurray: got a FFe for that ubuntu-support-status change? I believe that the removal of a command from all Ubuntu systems probably qualifies as a feature change. | 20:32 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.8] | 20:32 | |
| stgraber | well, someone apparently disagrees? :) | 20:33 |
| bdmurray | lol | 20:33 |
| stgraber | should have rejected faster... | 20:33 |
| Laney | block it in proposed! | 20:33 |
| rbalint | juliank, ok, let's keep the task installation that way | 20:33 |
| sil2100 | Ok, that was me, and it was supposed to be qemu that's accepted? | 20:34 |
| sil2100 | But apparently someone accepted it earlier, and some other package's checkbox got checked? | 20:34 |
| stgraber | I've already done qemu/libvirt | 20:34 |
| * sil2100 sighs | 20:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted barbican [source] (focal-proposed) [1:10.0.0~b2~git2020020508.7b14d983-0ubuntu3] | 20:35 | |
| sil2100 | Ok, sorry about fat fingering that one | 20:35 |
| bdmurray | I'm looking at python-novaclient | 20:35 |
| sil2100 | Hate it when LP leaves the tick even when the package gets accepted | 20:35 |
| stgraber | I'll just delete it from proposed then if that wasn't a deliberate accept | 20:35 |
| stgraber | bdmurray: consider it rejected then | 20:35 |
| cpaelzer | sil2100: you wanted to do the right thing - accept my uploads - it is the spirit that counts | 20:36 |
| cpaelzer | stgraber: thank you as well then | 20:36 |
| sil2100 | Didn't know someone was reviewing those, then again maybe I should not be here at this hour | 20:36 |
| stgraber | yeah, this is always a bit racy at this time in the cycle :) | 20:37 |
| stgraber | bdmurray: to be clear, I'm happy to grant you an FFe for this, but I want to have a LP bug to track it as that may need to be in the release notes (covering both the field being gone, the tool being removed and what the alternative is) | 20:39 |
| bdmurray | stgraber: okay | 20:40 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted php7.4 [source] (focal-proposed) [7.4.3-4ubuntu2] | 20:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-glanceclient [source] (focal-proposed) [1:3.1.1-0ubuntu1] | 20:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mesa [source] (focal-proposed) [20.0.4-2ubuntu1] | 20:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-novaclient [source] (focal-proposed) [2:17.0.0-0ubuntu1] | 20:46 | |
| cpaelzer | sil2100: I just see you are also todays SRU-rota person - feel free to ignore in case the release frenzy makes you busy enough, but if you have a minute (shouldn't be more) this one is just waiting for release => https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools/+bug/1868012/comments/13 | 20:46 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1868012 in open-vm-tools (Ubuntu Eoan) "MRE for open-vm-tools to version 11.0.5" [Low,Fix committed] | 20:46 |
| cpaelzer | and I pinged no one else to avoid concurrent handling :-) | 20:47 |
| rbalint | bdmurray, juliank, cpaelzer https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+git/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+merge/382454 | 20:51 |
| juliank | rbalint: can that be changed to check that another time-daemon is installed already? | 20:58 |
| xnox | juliank: apw: Laney: vorlon: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-installer/ubiquity/+git/ubiquity/+merge/382456 | 20:59 |
| juliank | rbalint: that is, add `and any(p.is_installed for p in self.get_providing_packages("time-daemon"))` to the if? | 21:00 |
| vorlon | apw, we have nvidia vs lrm version skew in the release pocket /again/ | 21:08 |
| juliank | yikes | 21:08 |
| vorlon | ii nvidia-dkms-440 440.82-0ubuntu1 amd64 NVIDIA DKMS package | 21:08 |
| vorlon | $ apt-cache show linux-modules-nvidia-440-generic|grep Prov | 21:08 |
| vorlon | Provides: nvidia-dkms-440 (= 440.64-0ubuntu3) | 21:08 |
| vorlon | $ | 21:08 |
| === bdmurray changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: Bionic 18.04.4, Eoan 19.10 | Archive: Final Freeze | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Focal Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or gin | melius malum quod cognoscis | ||
| Laney | \o/ | 21:14 |
| mwhudson | ok how many times can we upload ubiquity in the next week team? | 21:16 |
| Laney | One more this week, and then experience tells me probably twice next ... | 21:18 |
| tsimonq2 | Speaking of uploading critical packages, how bad would the Release Team hate me if I wanted to upload a few (tested) patches to util-linux to fix some Calamares issues? | 21:23 |
| Laney | bad | 21:24 |
| tsimonq2 | I'm specifically looking at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/util-linux/util-linux.git/commit/?id={fa3ffa,ac762e} | 21:27 |
| RikMills | bad object :P | 21:28 |
| dax | he means https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/util-linux/util-linux.git/commit/?id=fa3ffa and https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/util-linux/util-linux.git/commit/?id=ac762e | 21:28 |
| tsimonq2 | Laney: Not surprising, but to be fair, there is a stop gap if they're ready to burn me at the stake, and they come from upstream Git. | 21:28 |
| tsimonq2 | dax: Correct. | 21:29 |
| RikMills | dax: I know | 21:30 |
| vorlon | sil2100: hey, the nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 that you accepted is a big problem | 21:30 |
| vorlon | sil2100: it skews vs linux-restricted-modules and means we can't replace nvidia-dkms with linux-modules-nvidia at GA and give users signed modules like we're supposed to be doing | 21:31 |
| Laney | vorlon: If there's special knowledge for RT members to know before reviewing classes of packages, could it be written down somewhere? | 21:34 |
| Laney | I might have gotten that one wrong too myself | 21:34 |
| vorlon | Laney: well it's a failure that a) this didn't respect kernel freeze and b) there is no autopkgtest gating in place | 21:35 |
| vorlon | the kernel team is meant to be encapsulating the special knowledge in an autopkgtest that dtrt | 21:35 |
| Laney | TBH I didn't know that kernel freeze would have applied there | 21:37 |
| Laney | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelFreeze is a bit lacking | 21:37 |
| Laney | anyway I actually want to step away, I said what I wanted to, a bit of knowledge transfer would help me here | 21:38 |
| Laney | see ya | 21:38 |
| vorlon | bdmurray, sil2100: nvidia-graphics-drivers-440_440.82+really.440.64-0ubuntu4 now uploading; so far completely untested | 21:54 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 (focal-proposed/restricted) [440.82-0ubuntu1 => 440.82+really.440.64-0ubuntu4] (i386-whitelist) | 22:01 | |
| bdmurray | stgraber: Can I reuse the same upate-manager version number given what happened? | 22:03 |
| stgraber | bdmurray: no, you'll have to increase it | 22:04 |
| bdmurray | stgraber: alright, that's what I thought | 22:04 |
| bdmurray | stgraber: How does bug 1873362 look to you? | 22:06 |
| ubot5 | bug 1873362 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "remove ubuntu-support-status as its a confusing mess" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1873362 | 22:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.0-0ubuntu2 => 3.36.0-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop) | 22:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.12 => 20.04.13] (core) | 22:09 | |
| stgraber | bdmurray: commented | 22:09 |
| bdmurray | You've really seen people use it? | 22:14 |
| sarnold | bdmurray,stgraber, I thought I heard a rumour that the nice people working on the 'ua' tool were tasked with making a nice replacement | 22:21 |
| bdmurray | sarnold: I'm actually that nice person | 22:22 |
| sarnold | bdmurray: I've always said you were a nice person! excellent | 22:26 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-software [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.0-0ubuntu3] | 22:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.13] | 22:37 | |
| stgraber | bdmurray: yep, I've seen people use it to confirm that they have no unsupported packages on their system, included in nagios checks | 22:40 |
| jbicha | vorlon: could you reconsider your debhelper 13 rejection? my specific concern is that you can't currently use focal to build a package that Build-Depends on debhelper-compat (= 13) | 22:56 |
| jbicha | I expect lots of Debian packages will switch to that | 22:58 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.661 => 2.662] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) | 23:00 | |
| === s8321414_ is now known as s8321414 | ||
| === msalvatore_ is now known as msalvatore | ||
| bdmurray | jbicha: Your concern is that packages in focal will switch their Build-Depends after the release? | 23:10 |
| jbicha | no, it just would be nice to be able to build newer packages from Debian or 18.10 on 18.04 LTS without needing to mess with the compat level | 23:11 |
| jbicha | (workaround is to use debian/compat with 13 instead or lower the compat level to 12) | 23:12 |
| cjwatson | Is it possible to get at the exact qemu images used by our autopkgtests? I'm having trouble reproducing https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/amd64/p/python-launchpadlib/20200415_171509_0c21d@/log.gz | 23:16 |
| xnox | stgraber: bdmurray: "the new tool will be provided soon, which will report correct and accurate status not only for focal, but all series" | 23:32 |
| xnox | cjwatson: we have autopkgtest scripts that generate derivative autopkgtest image. It's simply uploaded into the autopkgtest account. I've tried glance image-download before, and it simply times out. | 23:32 |
| xnox | cjwatson: at best i can only launch a spare vm from the same image, and like grant ssh access to it. | 23:33 |
| cjwatson | I could also run the same scripts locally if I knew where they were, I suppose | 23:41 |
| cjwatson | I tried autopkgtest-buildvm-ubuntu-cloud and that apparently wasn't enough | 23:41 |
| mwhudson | cjwatson: are you testing the binaries from the archive or building them as part of the run? | 23:42 |
| cjwatson | The latter though I'd be slightly surprised if it mattered in this case | 23:42 |
| mwhudson | cjwatson: autopkgtest builds the packages without proposed enabled | 23:43 |
| cjwatson | But I can double-check | 23:43 |
| mwhudson | so it can matter | 23:43 |
| cjwatson | I agree in principle but it should just copy in identical Python code | 23:43 |
| mwhudson | true | 23:43 |
| mwhudson | i just lost a lot of time once getting confused by this | 23:44 |
| mwhudson | agree for python it shouldn't matter though | 23:44 |
| mwhudson | i hope there isn | 23:44 |
| mwhudson | t a dh-python in proposed at this stage in the cycle :) | 23:44 |
| cjwatson | mwhudson: Anyway "autopkgtest --apt-pocket=proposed=src:python-launchpadlib --apt-upgrade python-launchpadlib -- qemu ~/autopkgtest-focal-amd64.img" passes locally | 23:57 |
| mwhudson | cjwatson: :( | 23:57 |
| cjwatson | It's plausibly to do with an extra keyring provider being installed or something but I don't know exactly what | 23:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
