[00:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xfwm4 (focal-proposed/universe) [4.14.0-2ubuntu1 => 4.14.1-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntustudio, xubuntu)
[00:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected exo [source] (focal-proposed) [0.12.11-1ubuntu1]
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [20.1-10-g71af48df-0ubuntu4]
[00:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bind9 [source] (focal-proposed) [1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2]
[00:11] <Ukikie> Err...'devel' is an accepted convention, but I'll use focal and re-upload. :/
[00:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd-glib [source] (focal-proposed) [1.57-0ubuntu2]
[00:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libstaroffice (focal-proposed/universe) [0.0.6-1build1 => 0.0.7-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[00:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libstaroffice [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.0.7-1]
[00:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: po4a (focal-proposed/universe) [0.55-1 => 0.57-2] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[00:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debhelper (focal-proposed/main) [12.10ubuntu1 => 13ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[00:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (focal-proposed/main) [2.20.11-0ubuntu26 => 2.20.11-0ubuntu27] (core, i386-whitelist)
[00:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: exo (focal-proposed/universe) [0.12.11-1 => 0.12.11-1ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio, xubuntu)
[00:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.660 => 2.661] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[00:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted exo [source] (focal-proposed) [0.12.11-1ubuntu1]
[00:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-installer (focal-proposed/main) [20101020ubuntu611 => 20101020ubuntu612] (core)
[00:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.11 => 20.04.12] (core)
[00:52] <xnox> ok, accept everything, migrate everything, and it's good enough for candidate images
[01:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: thunar (focal-proposed/universe) [1.8.12-1 => 1.8.14-0ubuntu1] (mythbuntu, ubuntustudio, xubuntu)
[01:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xubuntu-default-settings (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04.2 => 20.04.3] (xubuntu)
[01:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-defaults (focal-proposed/main) [2:1.13~1ubuntu1 => 2:1.13~1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[02:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kylin-nm (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.3-1 => 1.2.4-1] (ubuntukylin) (sync)
[02:09] <vorlon> RikMills: probably related to the publisher delays that wgrant was mentioning before - it's "published" in launchpad but hasn't made it out yet to where proposed-migration sees it
[02:10] <vorlon> RikMills: oh n/m there was a lot more discussion after you highlighted me ;)
[02:10] <wgrant> vorlon, RikMills: kdepim-addons should be fixed now
[02:10] <wgrant> I did the DB surgery and then revived its dead binaries a few minutes ago
[02:10] <vorlon> hurrah
[02:11] <RikMills> wgrant: thank you :)
[02:13] <wgrant> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/amd64/kdepim-addons <- published fine, so hopefully proposed-migration will catch it next time
[02:16] <RikMills> great
[02:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd-glib (focal-proposed/main) [1.57-0ubuntu2 => 1.57-0ubuntu3] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[02:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-lts (focal-proposed/main) [11.0.7+10-2ubuntu1 => 11.0.7+10-2ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[03:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: boost-defaults (focal-proposed/main) [1.71.0.0ubuntu1 => 1.71.0.0ubuntu2] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[03:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: keybinder-3.0 (focal-proposed/universe) [0.3.2-1 => 0.3.2-1ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio, xubuntu)
[04:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.0-0ubuntu1 => 3.36.0-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[06:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (focal-proposed/main) [67ubuntu20.04.3 => 67ubuntu20.04.4] (ubuntu-desktop)
[06:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mesa (focal-proposed/main) [20.0.4-1ubuntu1 => 20.0.4-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist, xorg)
[06:10] <tjaalton> mesa ^ needs the llvm-10 sync
[06:11] <tjaalton> locutus_: now llvm-10 -4 isn't tagged ;)
[06:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26]
[06:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26]
[06:16] <tjaalton> oh, mesa ftbfs on ppc64el on debian. that's just great
[06:16] <tjaalton> (because of llvm)
[06:16] <tjaalton> scratch that then
[06:20] <vorlon> xnox: so your livecd-rootfs is queue switches the desktop to use only generic-hwe-20.04 but I thought the plan was to offer both generic-hwe-20.04 and generic
[06:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glibc (focal-proposed/main) [2.31-0ubuntu8 => 2.31-0ubuntu9] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)
[06:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd-glib [source] (focal-proposed) [1.57-0ubuntu3]
[06:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.6]
[06:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glibc [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.31-0ubuntu9]
[06:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted resource-agents [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.5.0-2ubuntu2]
[06:27] <tjaalton> I'll upload a new mesa with just a couple of fixes in a bit
[06:29] <seb128> hey there, could someone review/get in some of the pending desktop items?
[06:30] <seb128> - glib2.0 first, it's a bugfix version and includes some fixes we would like to see in release, one being for a segfault that random apps are hitting (bug #1872153)
[06:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (focal-proposed) [2:16.0.0~b3~git2020041516.5f42488a9a-0ubuntu1]
[06:31] <seb128> - gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock  has some rls targetted fixes as well
[06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libva (focal-proposed/universe) [2.7.0-1 => 2.7.0-2] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) (sync)
[06:31] <seb128> - and then pulseaudion evolution-data-server snapd-glib which have small but useful fixes
[06:31] <tjaalton> libva ^ has a fix for mapping the proper vaapi driver to use on current mesa
[06:32] <tjaalton> which uses 'iris' instead of 'i965' by default on intel
[06:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glib2.0 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.64.2-1~fakesync1]
[06:34] <seb128> thanks!
[06:34] <vorlon> seb128: I tried to review some of these and bounced off of the pulseaudio one, there's quite a long list of patches added without bug links so I wasn't comfortable with it
[06:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected debhelper [source] (focal-proposed) [13ubuntu1]
[06:35] <vorlon> maybe it needs more explanation, or maybe it needs someone reviewing it not at 11:30pm
[06:35] <seb128> vorlon, pulseaudio we ship a rc and looks like stable isn't going to be on time for focal so I went to git and cherry picked the pending commits that looked useful, I can reduce to only the important ones if you prefer
[06:35] <seb128> right
[06:35] <seb128> let's see what the europeans say
[06:36] <seb128> vorlon, evolution-data-server and snapd-glib should be trivial, the first one has a patch cherry picked from git and the second one is just adding dh_translations to the build so we can translate it
[06:36] <vorlon> seb128: ah; an update to sync with current git would probably give me more confidence what no dependencies are missed from any of the cherry-picked patches
[06:37] <seb128> vorlon, ok, feel free to reject and I will re-upload
[06:38] <vorlon> bdmurray: I wonder if we should blacklist the systemctl package in Ubuntu, or if we expect folks to actually use that
[06:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected pulseaudio [source] (focal-proposed) [1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3]
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (focal-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu27]
[06:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debian-installer [source] (focal-proposed) [20101020ubuntu612]
[06:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-defaults [source] (focal-proposed) [2:1.13~1ubuntu2]
[06:42] <jibel> vorlon, hi, https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-installer/ubiquity/+git/ubiquity/+merge/376815 is still needed? I'm asking because there is no task for ubiquity in the linked bug report and it's fix released
[06:42] <jibel> but not merged in ubiquity
[06:43] <vorlon> jibel: well, in light of LP: 1869187 the implementation needs fixing
[06:43] <vorlon> but yes, it is still important to get this done
[06:48] <vorlon> jibel: pushed a rebase + fix for LP: #1869187
[06:53] <jibel> thanks, I'll test and merge it
[06:55] <vorlon> xnox: mentions of the community-maas seed still appear on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution (focal-proposed/universe) [3.36.1-1 => 3.36.1-2] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin) (sync)
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntukylin-default-settings (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04.1 => 20.04.2] (ubuntukylin)
[07:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mesa (focal-proposed/main) [20.0.4-1ubuntu1 => 20.0.4-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist, xorg)
[07:22] <tjaalton> this ^ replaces the previous upload of mesa
[07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution (focal-proposed/universe) [3.36.1-1 => 3.36.1-2] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin) (sync)
[07:43] <LocutusOfBorg> tjaalton, we should ask sylvestre for that
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.4-2 => 6.1.6-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[07:44] <tjaalton> LocutusOfBorg: I did, he said it's mesa upstream bug
[07:44] <tjaalton> anyway, mesa migration to llvm-10 is a post-release thing now
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-ext-pack [sync] (focal-proposed) [6.1.6-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.4-dfsg-4 => 6.1.6-dfsg-1] (ubuntu-cloud) (sync)
[07:45] <LocutusOfBorg> please accept vbox, its a bugfix only release with 3d guest/host acceleration fixes
[07:45] <LocutusOfBorg> https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Changelog here the changelog
[08:07] <Laney> I'm thinking
[08:08] <Laney> this "upload, and then ping in the channel" thing that we have (no specific criticism of anyone)
[08:08] <Laney> maybe we should give out some advice about saying the same justification you give in here in the debian/changelog instead (or a bug)
[08:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (focal-proposed/main) [1:13.99.1-1ubuntu2 => 1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[08:11] <seb128> ^ reuploaded to match what Steve asked earlier, having a git cherrypick patch rather than individual commits
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.661]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.12]
[08:15] <seb128> Laney, it makes sense imho to have the changelog describing enough to give a sense of the importance of the upload, it wouldn't hurt to recommend that yes
[08:16] <seb128> (bit more problematic with syncs but at least doing it for uploads would be a positive step)
[08:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (focal-proposed/main) [0.98-0ubuntu4 => 0.99-0ubuntu1] (core)
[08:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected spirv-headers [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.5.1+git20200409-1]
[08:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected vulkan-loader [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.2.135.0-2]
[08:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected spirv-tools [sync] (focal-proposed) [2020.2-1]
[08:23] <sil2100> Laney, apw, vorlon: the last-minute barely-on-time netplan 0.99 uploaded ^ (we have an FFe for it)
[08:23] <Laney> not at all scary
[08:23] <sil2100> I have test-built it and sanity tested it before uploading
[08:24] <sil2100> That being said, we know how risky this is so both me and slyon will have eyes wide open for any regressions and ready for hotfix real quick
[08:24] <tjaalton> someone rejected vulkan-loader/spirv?
[08:25] <apw> not me
[08:26] <tjaalton> vulkan-tools & -validationlayers, and glslang need to be removed from proposed then
[08:26] <RikMills> who would be best to review (and maybe upload) a software-properties fix?
[08:26] <sil2100> Not me as well, I'm busy trying not to blow up the whole world with this netplan thing
[08:26] <LocutusOfBorg> tjaalton, you just need to provide information there https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vulkan-loader/+bug/1871754
[08:26] <RikMills> lol. np
[08:27] <Laney> RikMills: try in #ubuntu-devel, no need for release team for that
[08:27] <tjaalton> LocutusOfBorg: ah there it was
[08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-noto-color-emoji [sync] (focal-proposed) [0~20200408-1]
[08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jackd2 (focal-proposed/main) [1.9.12~dfsg-2ubuntu1 => 1.9.12~dfsg-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[08:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected pyhamcrest [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.9.0-3]
[08:33] <seb128> sil2100, we didn't get langpacks refresh this week, is that cron job still not working?
[08:36] <ginggs> would someone please 'force-reset-test octave-communications/1.2.2-1build1/ppc64el' ? octave-communications was removed on ppc64el
[08:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected inkscape [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.92.5-1]
[08:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nginx [source] (focal-proposed) [1.17.10-0ubuntu1]
[08:39] <sil2100> seb128: the instance is inaccessible, probably due being out of free space - I'm trying to get it back with IS since yesterday, but anyway, me and Gunnar decided we'll just do the full refresh today/tomorrow instead
[08:40] <sil2100> seb128: since we always refresh the base translations right before release
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (focal-proposed/main) [0.98.7 => 0.98.8] (core)
[08:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jtreg [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.0-b01-2.1]
[08:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vlc [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.0.9.2-1]
[08:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libinput [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.15.5-1]
[08:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted latte-dock [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.11-0ubuntu1]
[08:47] <seb128> sil2100, right, would just have been nice to be able to test/spot bugs before the base refresh...
[08:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-data-server [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.36.1-2]
[08:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-intel [sync] (focal-proposed) [2:2.99.917+git20200226-1]
[08:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted modemmanager [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.12.8-1]
[08:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-input-evdev [sync] (focal-proposed) [1:2.10.6-2]
[08:53] <xnox> vorlon:  re:community-maas => horum will look
[08:54] <xnox> vorlon:  debhelper diff is tiny, the biggest gain is marking lever 13 stable (the package version number change => debhelper-compat v13 provides is there)
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted enigmail [sync] (focal-proposed) [2:2.1.6+ds1-1]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-deva-extra [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.0-5]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-guru-extra [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.0-5]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-beng-extra [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.0-7]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-orya-extra [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.0-6]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-gujr-extra [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[08:55] <xnox> vorlon:  in germinate-output community* things are empty. horum.
[09:02] <tjaalton> Laney: thanks for pointing out that vulkan ffe didn't have u-r subscribed, the description is updated now
[09:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntukylin-default-settings [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.2]
[09:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jackd2 [source] (focal-proposed) [1.9.12~dfsg-2ubuntu2]
[09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xfwm4 [source] (focal-proposed) [4.14.1-0ubuntu1]
[09:10] <locutus_> wgrant, what happened to the riscv64 machine?
[09:10] <locutus_> [BUILDING] Currently building on riscv64-qemu-lcy01-002 (8C, 20GiB) on riscv64-qemu-lcy01-002 (8C, 20GiB) Cancel build
[09:10] <locutus_> is it building twice on the same machine? network error?
[09:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libxcomposite (focal-proposed/main) [1:0.4.5-0ubuntu1 => 1:0.4.5-1] (core, i386-whitelist, xorg) (sync)
[09:11] <wgrant> locutus_: A display artifact from the surgery to revive it
[09:11] <wgrant> A harmless mistake on my part
[09:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libxdamage (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.1.5-1 => 1:1.1.5-2] (core, i386-whitelist, xorg) (sync)
[09:12] <locutus_> if its harmless, its ok then :)
[09:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libxfixes (focal-proposed/main) [1:5.0.3-1 => 1:5.0.3-2] (core, i386-whitelist, xorg) (sync)
[09:12] <Laney> 🗲🗲🗲🗲🗲🗲🗲🗲🗲🗲🗲🗲🗲🗲🗲🗲
[09:12] <Laney> think I understood what the BREAK_ARCHES problem is
[09:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libxres (focal-proposed/main) [2:1.2.0-3 => 2:1.2.0-4] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop, xorg) (sync)
[09:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-vmware (focal-proposed/main) [1:13.3.0-2build1 => 1:13.3.0-3] (desktop-core, xorg) (sync)
[09:14] <Laney> the package gets rejected by the autopkgtest policy
[09:18] <sil2100> apw: since Laney is probably deep in britney debugging now, maybe you would like to review the big netplan.io 0.99 FFe'd upload in the queue?
[09:19] <locutus_> sil2100, I would appreciate a virtualbox review, its made of bugfixes on the guest 3d acceleration parts, something we really would like to have in our iso...
[09:20] <locutus_> I can privately say something more if you are interested in what happened
[09:21] <Laney> everything will be reviewed
[09:21] <Laney> you might have noticed that I did a ton this morning already :-)
[09:22] <locutus_> yep, and thanks for that!
[09:22] <sil2100> locutus_: yeah, we're doing our best o/
[09:22] <locutus_> sil is usually doing a great job on vbox part, this is why I ping directly :)
[09:23] <locutus_> also, if you want to accept llvm-toolchain-10, there is a block-proposed bug already, that makes sure riscv64 finishes before going in release
[09:23] <locutus_> it takes days to build, and it contains s390x fixes for mesa builds...
[09:23] <locutus_> otherwise I can do in bileto and publish when the riscv64 build is fine, just let me know if you prefer this way
[09:30] <cpaelzer> SRU Team (and or rbasak who reviewed the last one) - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chrony/+bug/1872183/comments/17
[09:31] <cpaelzer> the new chrony in bionic-unapproved will fix the test issues, I'd appreciate if it could get into bionic-proposed asap
[09:33] <Laney> locutus_: yeah bileto makes me more comfortable tbh
[09:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected llvm-toolchain-10 [sync] (focal-proposed) [1:10.0.0-4]
[09:35] <locutus_> Laney, do we have riscv64 on bileto?
[09:36] <locutus_> seems like we have it, I just opened one without
[09:38] <locutus_> btw wrt inkscape delta, the ppc64el can be dropped, the python move not, mapreri will upload in debian later today
[09:38] <locutus_> https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+build/19167017
[09:41] <locutus_> (but a plain sync of inkscape works with virtual python-dev provides)
[09:49] <locutus_> wgrant, are you sure the build isn't stuck? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-10/1:10.0.0-3/+build/19151969 the changelog looks always the same...
[09:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chrony (bionic-proposed/main) [3.2-4ubuntu4.3 => 3.2-4ubuntu4.4] (ubuntu-server)
[09:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gtk+3.0 (focal-proposed/main) [3.24.17-3ubuntu1 => 3.24.18-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected evolution [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.36.1-2]
[10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (focal-proposed/main) [0.98.7 => 0.98.9] (core)
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-1.14 (focal-proposed/universe) [1.14.2-1 => 1.14.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-1.14 [source] (focal-proposed) [1.14.2-1ubuntu1]
[10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gpodder (focal-proposed/universe) [3.10.13-1 => 3.10.15-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[10:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gpodder [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.10.15-1]
[10:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (focal-proposed/main) [1:3.36.1-1ubuntu4 => 1:3.36.1-1ubuntu5] (ubuntu-desktop)
[10:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox [sync] (focal-proposed) [6.1.6-dfsg-1]
[10:55]  * sil2100 winks on the netplan.io upload in the queue
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: smb4k (focal-proposed/universe) [3.0.4-0ubuntu1 => 3.0.4-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted smb4k [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.0.4-1]
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gtk+3.0 [source] (focal-proposed) [3.24.18-1ubuntu1]
[11:24] <locutus_> is it possible to kick out golang-github-census-instrumentation-opencensus-proto from focal? new package, autopkgtest failure/flaky in debian too, not in testing, blocking golang-goprotobuf migration
[11:25] <locutus_> also, please convert the camitk hint into a forget everywhere except amd64 or bump it...
[11:27] <mwhudson> sadface? https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu-server/focal/daily-live-20200416.log
[11:31] <sil2100> ;/
[11:31] <Laney> There was some maintenance in Launchpad and several in-progress builds failed like that
[11:31] <cjwatson> Right, we were switching DB master
[11:32] <cjwatson> Now on full SSD
[11:38] <seb128> \o/
[11:41] <mwhudson> Laney: so what happens, start another build?
[11:41] <mwhudson> actually i am going to bed
[11:42] <Laney> mwhudson: Yeah feel free to retry
[11:42] <mwhudson> Laney: don't have the power, i don't think
[11:42] <cjwatson> (standby isn't on full SSD yet, but hopefully ASAP)
[11:42] <Laney> I'm stupid and deleted the mails so don't have a list of the failures to hand
[11:42] <mwhudson> i only care about focal live server
[11:45] <Laney> sil2100: I'll look at netplan.io, finished with proposed-migration now I think
[11:45] <Laney> if you wanted to be nice, you could review what I came up with there 😇😇😇😇😇😇
[11:46] <sil2100> \o/ thank you! I'm checking now if all the non-langpack translations have been done
[11:46] <sil2100> Sure, do you have an MP? Or did you commit already?
[11:46] <Laney> just writing commit messages
[11:49] <Laney> ah wait, need to take care of one more case (missing builds)
[11:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fprintd (focal-proposed/main) [1.90.1-1 => 1.90.1-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core)
[11:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gsettings-desktop-schemas (focal-proposed/main) [3.35.91-0ubuntu1 => 3.36.0-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[12:14] <sil2100> Laney: ok, this was supposed to be an MP but I prematurely pushed it to trunk: can I finalize and release https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/update-manager/main/revision/2879 ?
[12:15] <sil2100> Laney: it's a bump of the dates following the exact same schema as for bionic: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/update-manager/bionic/revision/2826
[12:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted chrony [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.2-4ubuntu4.4]
[12:15] <sil2100> We probably want to make it dynamic, using distro-info-data, but now is not the time
[12:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: inkscape (focal-proposed/universe) [0.92.4-5ubuntu5 => 0.92.5-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntustudio)
[12:16] <Laney> sil2100: Looks OK to me, but marcustomlinson has a MP up which we should include in the next upload: https://code.launchpad.net/~marcustomlinson/update-manager/update-manager/+merge/382410
[12:18] <sil2100> Laney: would you like me to review it and merge it?
[12:19] <sil2100> I need to help out with lunch now, but I can do that when I'm back
[12:19] <Laney> sil2100: If you're up for it, feel free
[12:19] <Laney> here's my britney2-ubuntu MP too: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/+git/britney2-ubuntu/+merge/382422
[12:19] <Laney> should unblock some items like remmina
[12:20] <sil2100> Ok, will do those two shortly :)
[12:21]  * Laney lunches too, then netplan time
[12:25] <kanashiro> could someone please take a look at this MP to unblock mysql-8.0? https://code.launchpad.net/~lucaskanashiro/britney/hint-update-mysql-connector-c++/+merge/382246
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fonts-monoid (focal-proposed/universe) [0.61-2 => 0.61-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-monoid [source] (focal-proposed) [0.61-2ubuntu1]
[14:00] <Laney> sil2100: nonon
[14:00] <Laney> you're leaking symbols in this libnetplan0, e.g. you have one from GLib in there
[14:01] <Laney> oh no that's not true
[14:01] <Laney> but you are exporting a g_... function on the ABI which seems wrong
[14:01] <sil2100> Which one? We actually define one symbol that looks like a GLib symbol ;p
[14:02] <Laney> this ABI seems a bit wonky
[14:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.620.2]
[14:04] <Laney> I think you should scope them all with netplan_ prefixes
[14:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1018.19~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[14:09] <sil2100> Yeah, I guess the library part is not ideal yet, it's used only by netplan and one NM plugin (unreleased anywhere)
[14:09] <sil2100> So technically just by netplan
[14:10] <sil2100> We might look into namespacing it better
[14:13] <Laney> you've got functions in there with *really* generic names like "parser_error" and "is_ip4_address" though :S
[14:14] <sil2100> But I'd of course target that for uh, 0.100 ? Or whatever version we'll have next
[14:14] <sil2100> We might drop most of those symbols once we flesh out the other work
[14:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ddtp-translations (focal-proposed/universe) [20200110.1 => 20200416.1] (no packageset)
[14:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ddtp-translations [source] (focal-proposed) [20200416.1]
[14:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shadow (focal-proposed/main) [1:4.8.1-1ubuntu4 => 1:4.8.1-1ubuntu5] (core, i386-whitelist)
[14:19] <sil2100> Oh, yay, mvo uploaded ddtp-translations \o/
[14:20] <didrocks> I thought this enthousiast was for my shadow upload :p
[14:20] <sil2100> Laney: uh, ok, I wrapped my head around that MP of yours and approved, just some comment typos
[14:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zsys (focal-proposed/main) [0.4.4 => 0.4.5] (no packageset)
[14:22] <Laney> merci
[14:23] <sil2100> Was surprised it actually didn't work like that before already
[14:23] <Laney> apw: around? wanting a second opinion on netplan.io, see my above comments (weird ABI, sil2100 wants us to overlook that)
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-budgie-meta (focal-proposed/universe) [0.64 => 0.65] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-budgie)
[14:24] <Laney> +            self.log('Tests for %s: %s' % (source_name, tests))
[14:24] <Laney> WOH
[14:24] <Laney> that's not supposed to be there /o\
[14:24] <sil2100> I thought it's additional logging
[14:24] <Laney> yeah just added it while developing
[14:27] <sil2100> Laney, apw: yeah, I'd appreciate letting that through, mostly because in theory it should be harmless - realistically there should be no consumers of this library, we actually split it out only for the NM read-write plugin, which is why the API isn't super well designed
[14:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adduser (focal-proposed/main) [3.118ubuntu1 => 3.118ubuntu2] (core)
[14:30] <sil2100> Guess the most interesting symbols are the ones with netplan_* anyway
[14:30] <sil2100> We probably don't need to export any others, but uh...
[14:36] <bdmurray> sil2100, Laney: What packages can I be reviewing in the Focal queue?
[14:36] <seb128> could those desktop items get reviewed? they have fixes we would like to see in the release: pulseaudio software-properties gnome-control-center fprintd gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock
[14:36] <seb128> bdmurray, hey, good timing :p
[14:37] <bdmurray> From your perspective!
[14:37] <bdmurray> ;-)
[14:37] <seb128> haha
[14:37] <seb128> right :)
[14:40] <tdaitx> would someone be so kind as to approve openjdk-lts in focal?
[14:42] <sil2100> We'll get to it soon ;)
[14:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ovn-octavia-provider (focal-proposed/universe) [0.0.1~git2020022414.000049c-0ubuntu1 => 0.1.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[14:43] <doko> tdaitx, sil2100: please no, there's one package waiting in -proposed, and I already had prepared a build for the remaining issue
[14:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ovn-octavia-provider [source] (focal-proposed) [0.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[14:44] <tdaitx> doko: is there one more issue than the one you pointed out yesterday and asked me to fix?
[14:44] <sil2100> Should we reject?
[14:44] <doko> please do, yes.
[14:45] <doko> tdaitx: I asked you to apply it for the security updates, and that I would prepare the upload for focal
[14:46] <tdaitx> doko ok, I mixed things up then, only thing is that my security updates "backported" this last upload, including version
[14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (bionic-proposed/main) [1.173.17 => 1.173.18] (core, kernel)
[14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (xenial-proposed/main) [1.157.22 => 1.157.23] (core, kernel)
[14:48] <tdaitx> doko: please just make sure focal lands a higher version than 2ubuntu2
[14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected openjdk-lts [source] (focal-proposed) [11.0.7+10-2ubuntu2]
[14:55] <sil2100> apw, Laney: I'd really appreciate a go/no-go for netplan before final-freeze - expecially that we're so late with everything, I'd like to have potentially more time for fixing issues in case those pop up ;)
[14:55] <apw> sil2100, sorry, i'll look at the new enw
[14:58] <sil2100> I know the library part is not ideal - we'll make it better, I promise
[15:03] <apw> sil2100, tell me the one thing this brings that we cannot live without
[15:03] <sil2100> apw: a lot, we'd need the libnetplan stuff for our ongoing uc20 NM read-write plugin work, and the new SR-IOV feature is our roadmap item that we want to release
[15:03] <Laney> sil2100: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/FPRdPXRfds/ there's maybe a start of some visibility work
[15:04] <Laney> but if apw's ok-ish then I don't want to block
[15:05] <sil2100> apw: and all the other features are also basically needed for the ongoing NM plugin work
[15:05] <sil2100> Basically, we're trying to release this as it's necessary, we wouldn't release it if it only had things 'good to have' ;)
[15:05] <sil2100> (not this late in the cycle)
[15:05] <apw> Laney, i assume that would stop all these seemingly internal entries appearing in the .so list
[15:06] <sil2100> Laney: oh, fancy
[15:06] <Laney> I can't say if that's enough for this plugin though
[15:06] <Laney> but yeah that's the idea
[15:06] <sil2100> I don't know how much we'd actually need
[15:07] <Laney> bdmurray: sorry forgot to reply to you
[15:07] <sil2100> I could distro-patch something based on Laney's suggestion, but as said, not sure
[15:08] <Laney> I'm reviewing from the end
[15:08] <Laney> so you can start somewhere in the middle if you want
[15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted thunar [source] (focal-proposed) [1.8.14-0ubuntu1]
[15:08] <bdmurray> Laney: okay, its gonna be an hour before I can start
[15:08] <bdmurray> Laney: Do you know anything about livecd image building times? I added some info to the doc
[15:08] <apw> Laney, 99% of this diff appears to be changes due to the prefix on every single constant changing
[15:08] <sil2100> apw, Laney: my personal recommendation would be leaving it as is and then, calmly, flesh out which symbols are needed and sort out the header situation as well with a future revision
[15:09] <sil2100> (and bumping the soname of course)
[15:11] <xnox> Laney:  https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu/focal/daily-live-20200416.log looks sad
[15:12] <Laney> xnox: same as the earlier failures
[15:12] <Laney> can respin once your livecd-rootfs is published
[15:13] <Laney> bdmurray: They reverted the hack/workaround so it might be slow again, there's a fix proposed but not reviewed yet, will put the hack back if necessary next week
[15:15] <xnox> Laney:  perfect
[15:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons (focal-proposed/main) [19.10.2+git20200223-1 => 20.04.0-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[15:20] <apw> Laney, i see nothing horrific in this thing other than it being too big to review line by line; if it does what is claimed i think it is ok, and it does at least have tests.  we should insist on sil2000 doing the interface review
[15:22] <Laney> apw: Right, I wasn't reviewing the upstream stuff because it's too big!
[15:22] <Laney> I don't think I would want to link against this library so yeah good if there's a commitment to fix it
[15:25] <sil2100> Laney, apw: I pinky-promise to fix this (since now we have slyon to help out!)
[15:25] <vorlon> xnox: tiny debhelper diffs can have large effects on buildability, I'm standing by my nack of this
[15:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1020.21~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[15:31] <vorlon> juliank: btw should we have another shim-signed upload for the new (but unreleasable) shim with a roll-up of the packaging changes?
[15:31] <vorlon> juliank: or should we just leave things in the current state until we have a new signed shim
[15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: haskell-stack (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.1-3build2 => 1.9.3.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[15:32] <juliank> vorlon: doesn't really matter much i guess
[15:32] <juliank> vorlon: Should merge focal branch into master though
[15:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted haskell-stack [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.9.3.1-1]
[15:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: thunderbird (focal-proposed/main) [1:68.7.0+build1-0ubuntu1 => 1:68.7.0+build1-0ubuntu2] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[15:35] <seb128> is there anything we can do to help desktop items to be reviewed?
[15:35] <sil2100> seb128: I'll get to those shortly, we're in a meeting right now
[15:35] <seb128> vorlon, I reuploaded pulseaudio with one git cherry pick but it didn't get reviewed again, if you want to maybe have another look?
[15:35] <seb128> sil2100, ok, thanks
[15:35] <Laney> seb128: there's no problem, we're just working our way through everything
[15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: php7.4 (focal-proposed/main) [7.4.3-4ubuntu1 => 7.4.3-4ubuntu2] (i386-whitelist)
[15:36] <seb128> Laney, freeze is today and I need to call it a day in not long, I'm just trying to make sure I'm still around if there are questions/comments and that we don't miss the freeze
[15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted po4a [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.57-2]
[15:36] <Laney> you won't, things that were uploaded before the freeze will be reviewed
[15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kylin-nm [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.2.4-1]
[15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (focal-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu1]
[15:37] <seb128> k, fair enough
[15:37] <sil2100> \o/
[15:38] <sil2100> Laney, apw: thank you for accepting netplan! I know it wasn't an easy choice, we'll be sure to deal with any consequences swiftly
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted boost-defaults [source] (focal-proposed) [1.71.0.0ubuntu2]
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted keybinder-3.0 [source] (focal-proposed) [0.3.2-1ubuntu1]
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-software [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.0-0ubuntu2]
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mesa [source] (focal-proposed) [20.0.4-2ubuntu1]
[15:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock [source] (focal-proposed) [67ubuntu20.04.4]
[15:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu1] (core)
[15:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu1] (core)
[15:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu1] (core)
[15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu1] (core)
[15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [armhf] (focal-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu1] (core)
[15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libva [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.7.0-2]
[15:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.36.1-2]
[15:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted software-properties [source] (focal-proposed) [0.98.8]
[15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libgd2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.2.5-5.2ubuntu1 => 2.2.5-5.2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxcomposite [sync] (focal-proposed) [1:0.4.5-1]
[15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxfixes [sync] (focal-proposed) [1:5.0.3-2]
[15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxdamage [sync] (focal-proposed) [1:1.1.5-2]
[15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxres [sync] (focal-proposed) [2:1.2.0-4]
[15:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-vmware [sync] (focal-proposed) [1:13.3.0-3]
[15:49] <oSoMoN> dear release team, please consider accepting thunderbird 1:68.7.0+build1-0ubuntu2 into focal-proposed, it's removing a patch that we don't want to carry for 5 more years (was done in firefox a while ago but overlooked for thunderbird, better late than never…)
[15:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-stack [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.9.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[15:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fprintd [source] (focal-proposed) [1.90.1-1ubuntu1]
[15:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gsettings-desktop-schemas [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.0-1ubuntu1]
[15:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-control-center [source] (focal-proposed) [1:3.36.1-1ubuntu5]
[15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-stack [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.9.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[15:54] <Laney> ok I'm done with the queue for today probably
[15:54] <Laney> leave the rest of the fun for bdmurray
[15:54] <tdaitx> vorlon: libgd2 no change rebuild is in the unapproved queue
[15:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04.0-1]
[15:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted thunderbird [source] (focal-proposed) [1:68.7.0+build1-0ubuntu2]
[15:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted inkscape [source] (focal-proposed) [0.92.5-1ubuntu1]
[15:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-budgie-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [0.65]
[15:56] <oSoMoN> thanks!
[15:56] <sil2100> Laney: thanks!
[15:58] <Laney> tdaitx: btw, would have been possible for me to accept if the changelog said what the rebuild was for
[15:59] <Laney> but as it stood I didn't have enough information so left it
[16:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libgd2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.2.5-5.2ubuntu2]
[16:01] <tdaitx> Laney: ouch, sorry for that, it makes sense... I can't really remember seeing useful changelog entries for no change rebuilds, so I didn't stop to consider doing differently
[16:01] <vorlon> Laney: yeah we had out-of-band context, sorry
[16:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pulseaudio [source] (focal-proposed) [1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3]
[16:01] <vorlon> Laney: it was because the previous build was uploaded to the security pocket, which means riscv64 can't be built
[16:02] <vorlon> tdaitx: mine always say why I'm rebuilding :)
[16:02] <tdaitx> I clearly haven't been looking at enough of them
[16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-stack [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.9.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [riscv64] (focal-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu1] (core)
[16:03] <tdaitx> or I have only looked at the wrong ones for some reason
[16:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.6 => 1:20.04.7] (core)
[16:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted netplan.io [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu1]
[16:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted netplan.io [armhf] (focal-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu1]
[16:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted netplan.io [riscv64] (focal-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu1]
[16:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted netplan.io [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu1]
[16:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted netplan.io [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu1]
[16:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted netplan.io [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu1]
[16:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-castellan (focal-proposed/main) [3.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 3.0.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[16:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-keystoneclient (focal-proposed/main) [1:3.22.0-0ubuntu2 => 1:4.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (focal-proposed/main) [20.1-10-g71af48df-0ubuntu4 => 20.1-10-g71af48df-0ubuntu5] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud)
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-heatclient (focal-proposed/main) [2.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-novaclient (focal-proposed/main) [2:16.0.0-0ubuntu2 => 2:17.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-manilaclient (focal-proposed/main) [2.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[16:12] <Odd_Bloke> Hey release team, ^ that cloud-init upload fixes a test failure that we only saw building on Launchpad once the package was accepted.  I've done a test build in a PPA to confirm that this version of the package builds successfully on a Launchpad builder.
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireguard-linux-compat [sync] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.20200401-1ubuntu1~19.10.1]
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireguard [sync] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.20200319-1ubuntu1~19.10.1]
[16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-glanceclient (focal-proposed/main) [1:3.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:3.1.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.policy (focal-proposed/main) [3.0.3-0ubuntu1 => 3.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[16:18] <sil2100> Odd_Bloke: looking
[16:19]  * sil2100 is waiting for the debdiff
[16:19] <Laney> vorlon: by the way, I merged some changes to britney2-ubuntu earlier to have the autopkgtest policy not wait for uninstallables / missing builds on non-adt or BREAK arches
[16:22] <Laney> that should *not* by itself cause anything to migrate when it wouldn't have before
[16:22] <Laney> but just have test results for those items
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xubuntu-default-settings [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.3]
[16:25] <Odd_Bloke> sil2100: It's there now: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/474899794/cloud-init_20.1-10-g71af48df-0ubuntu4_20.1-10-g71af48df-0ubuntu5.diff.gz (Thanks for looking! :)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: barbican (focal-proposed/main) [1:10.0.0~b2~git2020020508.7b14d983-0ubuntu2 => 1:10.0.0~b2~git2020020508.7b14d983-0ubuntu3] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[16:26] <sil2100> Odd_Bloke: yeah, saw it!
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adduser [source] (focal-proposed) [3.118ubuntu2]
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zsys [source] (focal-proposed) [0.4.5]
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shadow [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.8.1-1ubuntu5]
[16:26] <sil2100> (and now accepted)
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [20.1-10-g71af48df-0ubuntu5]
[16:27] <Odd_Bloke> \o/
[16:28] <sil2100> I think I'm done with the queue for today as well
[16:30] <powersj> Odd_Bloke, sil2100 thanks!
[16:30] <sil2100> yw!
[16:32] <sil2100> Ok, guess it's time to get the langpack export prepared
[16:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-stack [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.9.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.7]
[16:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1020.21~18.04.1]
[16:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1018.19~18.04.1]
[17:00] <Laney> bdmurray: did you want to do the final freeze announcement later?
[17:01] <bdmurray> Laney: later being when?
[17:01] <Laney> 21:00 UTC is the usual time
[17:02] <Laney> so depending on how precise you want to be, then or then abouts :-)
[17:02] <jfh> hi - I assumed that there will be a new daily-live image in pending today - one with timestamp Apr-16 -- it's usually there at this time of the day, any ideas why it's not there today?
[17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-stack [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.9.3.1-1]
[17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-stack [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.9.3.1-1]
[17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-stack [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.9.3.1-1]
[17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-stack [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.9.3.1-1]
[17:03] <Laney> jfh: There was Launchpad maintenance earlier and a lot of in-progress image builds got abnormally terminated
[17:04] <jfh> Laney: ah, didn't know - so maybe better to wait until tomorrow ...
[17:04] <Laney> If you particularly need it then someone could request a rebuild, but otherwise yeah I expect tomorrow's builds to complete normally
[17:05] <Laney> that'll have to be someone else
[17:05]  * Laney goes away o/
[17:05] <jfh> nah - waiting for another day is still okay - just wondered ...
[17:06] <sil2100> bdmurray: so do you want to do it or should I?
[17:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cbp2make (focal-proposed/universe) [147+dfsg-2build1 => 147+dfsg-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:07] <bdmurray> sil2100: I can do it if you don't want to stick around.
[17:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cbp2make [sync] (focal-proposed) [147+dfsg-3]
[17:12] <sil2100> bdmurray: we can battle over it when the time comes
[17:13] <bdmurray> 💪
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: singularity (focal-proposed/universe) [0.30c-1 => 1.0b1-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:32] <vorlon> Laney: autopkgtest policy> thanks, sounds like just what we want
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted singularity [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.0b1-2]
[17:43] <vorlon> Laney: ah, it seems you've added riscv64 to the arches in britney.conf, is that just for testing or does that impact the production configs? I expect that breaks the britney runs for stable series by adding a non-existent arch to the config?
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted software-properties [source] (focal-proposed) [0.98.9]
[17:44] <vorlon> Laney: well, code/b2/britney.conf.ubuntu.eoan at least looks sane, so I guess things are fixed up appropriately somewhere :)
[17:48] <vorlon> wgrant: is https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-10/1:10.0.0-3/+build/19151969 hung or are logs just really, really slow to update here
[18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.7 => 1:20.04.8] (core)
[18:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-castellan [source] (focal-proposed) [3.0.1-0ubuntu1]
[18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-keystoneclient [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[18:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-heatclient [source] (focal-proposed) [2.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[19:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: postfix (focal-proposed/main) [3.4.10-1 => 3.4.10-1ubuntu1] (core)
[19:28] <mwhudson> can we get the focal live server iso built?
[19:28] <mwhudson> last night's failed and i really want to test one that's core18 based
[19:28] <mwhudson> vorlon, sil2100: ^
[19:32] <sil2100> mwhudson: ok
[19:33] <Laney> mwhudson: I'll trigger one (done)
[19:33] <mwhudson> Laney, sil2100: thanks
[19:33] <Laney> vorlon: The live configs are manually maintained afaik, but that unversioned one is used by the testsuite
[19:33] <sil2100> Oh that Laney snatching stuff from under my feet!
[19:34] <Laney> yeah I just wanted the ISO tracker karma
[19:37] <sil2100> Oh yes, we all want that delicious karma!
[19:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (focal-proposed/universe) [1:4.0.1-0ubuntu2 => 1:4.0.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[20:01] <rbalint> bdmurray, ok, i found why systemd-timesyncd gets removed on upgrade, it is because it is in minimal task
[20:01] <rbalint> bdmurray, where can we change the minimal task? seems not in ubuntu-meta
[20:01] <rbalint> vorlon,^?
[20:05] <bdmurray> rbalint: it == systemd-timesyncd?
[20:05] <rbalint> bdmurray, yes
[20:08] <rbalint> LP: #1872902
[20:08] <bdmurray> well then I don't seem to know the answer :-|
[20:08] <rbalint> bdmurray, thanks, i feel much better now :-)
[20:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.1-3ubuntu1 => 3.36.1-3ubuntu2] (desktop-core, desktop-extra)
[20:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pop-gtk-theme (focal-proposed/universe) [5.0.0~1576602011~19.10~7760154~ubuntu2 => 5.2.0~1586289568~20.04~f35b83b~ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pop-gtk-theme [source] (focal-proposed) [5.2.0~1586289568~20.04~f35b83b~ubuntu1]
[20:14] <rbalint> cjwatson, could you please help us out, how is systemd-timesynd added to the minimal task?
[20:16] <mwhudson> rbalint: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu.focal/minimal <- because systemd depends on it?
[20:16] <mwhudson> although it's systemd-timesyncd | time-daemon
[20:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-manilaclient [source] (focal-proposed) [2.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pop-icon-theme (focal-proposed/universe) [2.1.0~1571158475~19.10~6bf9347 => 2.1.0~1583343731~20.04~11f18cb~ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:19] <rbalint> mwhudson, i suspect that's the (wrong) cause, but why is anything added that's being depended on?
[20:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pop-icon-theme [source] (focal-proposed) [2.1.0~1583343731~20.04~11f18cb~ubuntu1]
[20:21] <rbalint> mwhudson, bdmurray  or u-r-u should not mark the packages in the seed, just the meta package ubuntu-minimal to install
[20:21] <mwhudson> hrm
[20:22] <juliank> rbalint, mwhudson seed is expanded recursively afaiui, and it will pick the real option if given real | provider, until you seed a provider explicitly
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (focal-proposed/main) [1:4.2-3ubuntu4 => 1:4.2-3ubuntu5] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[20:23] <juliank> rbalint, mwhudson Now, the reason to install all packages in the seed is that it's more consistent
[20:23] <juliank> e.g. now machines get upgraded to systemd-timesyncd, instead of having any random time-darmon
[20:23] <rbalint> juliank, well i'd argue that it is also wrong, consistently :-)
[20:23] <mwhudson> i get confused about which seed is which
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (focal-proposed/main) [6.0.0-0ubuntu6 => 6.0.0-0ubuntu7] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[20:24] <cpaelzer> hi release team, after quite a bunch of extra verifications I have put qemu and libvirt into focal-unapproved and wanted to ask to accept that before the final freeze happens
[20:24] <cpaelzer> In case it is needed, the referenced bugs and the merge proposals that you can reach from there have plenty of information.
[20:24] <juliank> rbalint: I'd argue the easiest way to work around is to add a blacklist of stuff we don't want to explictly replace
[20:25] <cpaelzer> bdmurray: sil2100: vorlon: apw: stgraber: ^^
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: heat-dashboard (focal-proposed/universe) [2.1.0~git2020021314.7842190-0ubuntu1 => 2.1.0~git2020032615.7842190-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:25] <cpaelzer> the uploads also include CVE fixes that mdeslaur assked me to add to focal
[20:25] <rbalint> juliank, yes, it is easy
[20:26] <juliank> rbalint: now, we do need dependencies expanded in the tasks, otherwise, installing tasks becomes unpredictable
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted heat-dashboard [source] (focal-proposed) [2.1.0~git2020032615.7842190-0ubuntu1]
[20:26] <juliank> Which can be a problem
[20:27] <sil2100> cpaelzer: looking
[20:29] <cpaelzer> ok sil2100, let me know if there is anything
[20:29] <cpaelzer> thanks in advance
[20:29] <juliank> We had a related issue when apport depended on x-terminal-emulator, and germinate expanded that to terminator on i386, and that popped up in component mismatches :)
[20:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.2-3ubuntu5]
[20:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (focal-proposed) [6.0.0-0ubuntu7]
[20:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mutter [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.1-3ubuntu2]
[20:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted postfix [source] (focal-proposed) [3.4.10-1ubuntu1]
[20:32] <stgraber> bdmurray: got a FFe for that ubuntu-support-status change? I believe that the removal of a command from all Ubuntu systems probably qualifies as a feature change.
[20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.8]
[20:33] <stgraber> well, someone apparently disagrees? :)
[20:33] <bdmurray> lol
[20:33] <stgraber> should have rejected faster...
[20:33] <Laney> block it in proposed!
[20:33] <rbalint> juliank, ok, let's keep the task installation that way
[20:34] <sil2100> Ok, that was me, and it was supposed to be qemu that's accepted?
[20:34] <sil2100> But apparently someone accepted it earlier, and some other package's checkbox got checked?
[20:34] <stgraber> I've already done qemu/libvirt
[20:35]  * sil2100 sighs
[20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted barbican [source] (focal-proposed) [1:10.0.0~b2~git2020020508.7b14d983-0ubuntu3]
[20:35] <sil2100> Ok, sorry about fat fingering that one
[20:35] <bdmurray> I'm looking at python-novaclient
[20:35] <sil2100> Hate it when LP leaves the tick even when the package gets accepted
[20:35] <stgraber> I'll just delete it from proposed then if that wasn't a deliberate accept
[20:35] <stgraber> bdmurray: consider it rejected then
[20:36] <cpaelzer> sil2100: you wanted to do the right thing - accept my uploads - it is the spirit that counts
[20:36] <cpaelzer> stgraber: thank you as well then
[20:36] <sil2100> Didn't know someone was reviewing those, then again maybe I should not be here at this hour
[20:37] <stgraber> yeah, this is always a bit racy at this time in the cycle :)
[20:39] <stgraber> bdmurray: to be clear, I'm happy to grant you an FFe for this, but I want to have a LP bug to track it as that may need to be in the release notes (covering both the field being gone, the tool being removed and what the alternative is)
[20:40] <bdmurray> stgraber: okay
[20:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted php7.4 [source] (focal-proposed) [7.4.3-4ubuntu2]
[20:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-glanceclient [source] (focal-proposed) [1:3.1.1-0ubuntu1]
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mesa [source] (focal-proposed) [20.0.4-2ubuntu1]
[20:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-novaclient [source] (focal-proposed) [2:17.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[20:46] <cpaelzer> sil2100: I just see you are also todays SRU-rota person - feel free to ignore in case the release frenzy makes you busy enough, but if you have a minute (shouldn't be more) this one is just waiting for release => https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools/+bug/1868012/comments/13
[20:47] <cpaelzer> and I pinged no one else to avoid concurrent handling :-)
[20:51] <rbalint> bdmurray, juliank, cpaelzer https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+git/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+merge/382454
[20:58] <juliank> rbalint: can that be changed to check that another time-daemon is installed already?
[20:59] <xnox> juliank:  apw: Laney: vorlon: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-installer/ubiquity/+git/ubiquity/+merge/382456
[21:00] <juliank> rbalint: that is, add `and any(p.is_installed for p in self.get_providing_packages("time-daemon"))` to the if?
[21:08] <vorlon> apw, we have nvidia vs lrm version skew in the release pocket /again/
[21:08] <juliank> yikes
[21:08] <vorlon> ii  nvidia-dkms-440 440.82-0ubuntu1 amd64        NVIDIA DKMS package
[21:08] <vorlon> $ apt-cache show linux-modules-nvidia-440-generic|grep Prov
[21:08] <vorlon> Provides: nvidia-dkms-440 (= 440.64-0ubuntu3)
[21:08] <vorlon> $
[21:14] <Laney> \o/
[21:16] <mwhudson> ok how many times can we upload ubiquity in the next week team?
[21:18] <Laney> One more this week, and then experience tells me probably twice next ...
[21:23] <tsimonq2> Speaking of uploading critical packages, how bad would the Release Team hate me if I wanted to upload a few (tested) patches to util-linux to fix some Calamares issues?
[21:24] <Laney> bad
[21:27] <tsimonq2> I'm specifically looking at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/util-linux/util-linux.git/commit/?id={fa3ffa,ac762e}
[21:28] <RikMills> bad object :P
[21:28] <dax> he means https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/util-linux/util-linux.git/commit/?id=fa3ffa and https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/util-linux/util-linux.git/commit/?id=ac762e
[21:28] <tsimonq2> Laney: Not surprising, but to be fair, there is a stop gap if they're ready to burn me at the stake, and they come from upstream Git.
[21:29] <tsimonq2> dax: Correct.
[21:30] <RikMills> dax: I know
[21:30] <vorlon> sil2100: hey, the nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 that you accepted is a big problem
[21:31] <vorlon> sil2100: it skews vs linux-restricted-modules and means we can't replace nvidia-dkms with linux-modules-nvidia at GA and give users signed modules like we're supposed to be doing
[21:34] <Laney> vorlon: If there's special knowledge for RT members to know before reviewing classes of packages, could it be written down somewhere?
[21:34] <Laney> I might have gotten that one wrong too myself
[21:35] <vorlon> Laney: well it's a failure that a) this didn't respect kernel freeze and b) there is no autopkgtest gating in place
[21:35] <vorlon> the kernel team is meant to be encapsulating the special knowledge in an autopkgtest that dtrt
[21:37] <Laney> TBH I didn't know that kernel freeze would have applied there
[21:37] <Laney> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelFreeze is a bit lacking
[21:38] <Laney> anyway I actually want to step away, I said what I wanted to, a bit of knowledge transfer would help me here
[21:38] <Laney> see ya
[21:54] <vorlon> bdmurray, sil2100: nvidia-graphics-drivers-440_440.82+really.440.64-0ubuntu4 now uploading; so far completely untested
[22:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 (focal-proposed/restricted) [440.82-0ubuntu1 => 440.82+really.440.64-0ubuntu4] (i386-whitelist)
[22:03] <bdmurray> stgraber: Can I reuse the same upate-manager version number given what happened?
[22:04] <stgraber> bdmurray: no, you'll have to increase it
[22:04] <bdmurray> stgraber: alright, that's what I thought
[22:06] <bdmurray> stgraber: How does bug 1873362 look to you?
[22:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.0-0ubuntu2 => 3.36.0-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[22:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.12 => 20.04.13] (core)
[22:09] <stgraber> bdmurray: commented
[22:14] <bdmurray> You've really seen people use it?
[22:21] <sarnold> bdmurray,stgraber, I thought I heard a rumour that the nice people working on the 'ua' tool were tasked with making a nice replacement
[22:22] <bdmurray> sarnold: I'm actually that nice person
[22:26] <sarnold> bdmurray: I've always said you were a nice person! excellent
[22:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-software [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.0-0ubuntu3]
[22:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.13]
[22:40] <stgraber> bdmurray: yep, I've seen people use it to confirm that they have no unsupported packages on their system, included in nagios checks
[22:56] <jbicha> vorlon: could you reconsider your debhelper 13 rejection? my specific concern is that you can't currently use focal to build a package that Build-Depends on debhelper-compat (= 13)
[22:58] <jbicha> I expect lots of Debian packages will switch to that
[23:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.661 => 2.662] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[23:10] <bdmurray> jbicha: Your concern is that packages in focal will switch their Build-Depends after the release?
[23:11] <jbicha> no, it just would be nice to be able to build newer packages from Debian or 18.10 on 18.04 LTS without needing to mess with the compat level
[23:12] <jbicha> (workaround is to use debian/compat with 13 instead or lower the compat level to 12)
[23:16] <cjwatson> Is it possible to get at the exact qemu images used by our autopkgtests?  I'm having trouble reproducing https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/amd64/p/python-launchpadlib/20200415_171509_0c21d@/log.gz
[23:32] <xnox> stgraber:  bdmurray: "the new tool will be provided soon, which will report correct and accurate status not only for focal, but all series"
[23:32] <xnox> cjwatson:  we have autopkgtest scripts that generate derivative autopkgtest image. It's simply uploaded into the autopkgtest account. I've tried glance image-download before, and it simply times out.
[23:33] <xnox> cjwatson:  at best i can only launch a spare vm from the same image, and like grant ssh access to it.
[23:41] <cjwatson> I could also run the same scripts locally if I knew where they were, I suppose
[23:41] <cjwatson> I tried autopkgtest-buildvm-ubuntu-cloud and that apparently wasn't enough
[23:42] <mwhudson> cjwatson: are you testing the binaries from the archive or building them as part of the run?
[23:42] <cjwatson> The latter though I'd be slightly surprised if it mattered in this case
[23:43] <mwhudson> cjwatson: autopkgtest builds the packages without proposed enabled
[23:43] <cjwatson> But I can double-check
[23:43] <mwhudson> so it can matter
[23:43] <cjwatson> I agree in principle but it should just copy in identical Python code
[23:43] <mwhudson> true
[23:44] <mwhudson> i just lost a lot of time once getting confused by this
[23:44] <mwhudson> agree for python it shouldn't matter though
[23:44] <mwhudson> i hope there isn
[23:44] <mwhudson> t a dh-python in proposed at this stage in the cycle :)
[23:57] <cjwatson> mwhudson: Anyway "autopkgtest --apt-pocket=proposed=src:python-launchpadlib --apt-upgrade python-launchpadlib -- qemu ~/autopkgtest-focal-amd64.img" passes locally
[23:57] <mwhudson> cjwatson: :(
[23:57] <cjwatson> It's plausibly to do with an extra keyring provider being installed or something but I don't know exactly what