| Ukikie | jbicha: ...Or you could cheat and just add the provides to current debhelper, but that seems less than ideal. | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 [source] (focal-proposed) [440.82+really.440.64-0ubuntu4] | 00:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 (focal-proposed/restricted) [440.82-0ubuntu1 => 440.82+really.440.64-0ubuntu4] (i386-whitelist) | 00:40 | |
| xnox | jbicha: it was rejected. | 00:44 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.661 => 2.663] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) | 00:45 | |
| xnox | cjwatson: the one thing that is not nice, is that teh VMs are "upgraded" daily | 00:45 |
| xnox | meaning one cannot quiete rebuild them independantly without knowing when/what they upgraded things to | 00:45 |
| cjwatson | TBH even just getting a list of installed package names and versions from one of those VMs would be helpful | 00:49 |
| xnox | git clone lp:autopkgtest-cloud | 00:50 |
| xnox | has ./tools/build-adt-image-all-clouds | 00:50 |
| cjwatson | If you can launch a VM from it do you think you could extract the output of "dpkg-query -W"? | 00:50 |
| cjwatson | But I'll look at that too, thanks | 00:50 |
| xnox | which does call from $ pull-lp-source autopkgtest => calls setup-commands/setup-testbed | 00:51 |
| xnox | which does a lot | 00:51 |
| xnox | like installing dbus & installing libpam-systemd | 00:51 |
| xnox | potentially triggering session auditing and what not. | 00:51 |
| cjwatson | dbus could well be relevant | 00:51 |
| xnox | cjwatson: right, but i'm about to sleep. Will do that for you tomorrow. Unless someone beats me to it. i.e. juliank maybe. | 00:51 |
| xnox | also gpg is installed | 00:53 |
| xnox | which means that systemd- user session jobs are probably started | 00:53 |
| cjwatson | Thanks, me too. Will see how far I get | 00:53 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 now build- and install-tested; I'll self-accept after a couple of hours if no one else is available to review | 01:08 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.1-3ubuntu2 => 3.36.1-3ubuntu3] (desktop-core, desktop-extra) | 01:10 | |
| === dax is now known as housecat | ||
| cjwatson | Ah, maybe I see the launchpadlib bug by zen debugging | 01:35 |
| cjwatson | Possibly https://code.launchpad.net/~cjwatson/launchpadlib/postpone-keyring-errors-import/+merge/382465 | 01:44 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 [source] (focal-proposed) [440.82+really.440.64-0ubuntu4] | 05:26 | |
| cpaelzer | cjwatson: for "exact images we use for autopkgtest" in one of such cases that I had (local autopkgtest-buildvm-ubuntu-cloud) didn't reproduce it - someone (IIRC Laney) was able to upload the image used in the tests into canonistack | 05:28 |
| cpaelzer | cjwatson: that way I was able to spawn exactly what the tests used | 05:28 |
| cpaelzer | I read the backlog and was unsure if you got to a solution already, if you did please ignore the noise | 05:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.662] | 05:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.663] | 05:45 | |
| seb128 | does anyone know how we there is so much backlog on autopkgtest? | 06:38 |
| seb128 | we are in freeze, it's not like we had synced half of the archive or done a python transition | 06:38 |
| RikMills | I guess glibc which triggers the world of tests under 'huge' is part of it? | 06:42 |
| seb128 | rikMills, right, I guess that could be it, unfortunate that one update can DoS the infra for over a day :-/ | 06:57 |
| RikMills | I guess at least it limits the immediate worker availability for !huge things. | 07:03 |
| * RikMills shrugs | 07:03 | |
| juliank | ugh | 07:20 |
| juliank | Laney: Apparently we got stuck with duplicate servers again in l{cy,gw}01, so we did not get updated images for a week | 07:24 |
| juliank | Really gotta add some error reporting _somewhere_ | 07:24 |
| juliank | cjwatson: So, dpkg -l on the autopkgtest image https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/NvQqMTKjGC/ | 07:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (focal-proposed/main) [15.2.0-0ubuntu2 => 15.2.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 07:29 | |
| juliank | I'll build some new focal images for amd64 | 07:35 |
| * juliank accidentally overwrote the logs for the other image builds | 07:39 | |
| juliank | lgw is exceeding quota, and hence, not building | 07:40 |
| juliank | trying by hand | 07:40 |
| juliank | So I guess modifying create-nova-image-new-release to delete any server with the same name as the one we're about to create will solve the issue | 07:42 |
| juliank | I think the script is exiting somewhere due to set -e and not reaching the part where it does the removing | 07:42 |
| juliank | Also, I hacked the script to not build i386 images on focal anymore | 07:43 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mutter [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.1-3ubuntu3] | 07:44 | |
| sil2100 | hm, this is weird | 07:51 |
| sil2100 | seb128: so I ran my langpack sanity tests and noticed that most of the new base refreshes are basically dropping snapd-glib.po | 07:53 |
| sil2100 | Ah, ok, I see the translation strings are completely different now | 07:56 |
| sil2100 | Which is why probably most languages didn't translate it | 07:56 |
| seb128 | sil2100, right, it was not properly set for translation until yesterday :-/ | 07:56 |
| sil2100 | seb128: ACK | 08:00 |
| sil2100 | I also see we MoinMoin.po and JabberBot.po being dropped in comparison to the last base refresh, but I suppose it's due to moin being removed from the archive | 08:01 |
| seb128 | likely | 08:01 |
| sil2100 | Anyway, thanks for the info, I'll start the upload process of those packs | 08:02 |
| Laney | juliank: hacked> please commit it | 08:06 |
| Laney | I'm not happy with the cowboys we're building up there | 08:06 |
| Laney | cjwatson: if you change log.gz in your url to artifacts.tar.gz there's a 'testbed-packages' in there which is the stuff that was preinstalled in the testbed itself, perhaps that's useful to you | 08:10 |
| juliank | Laney: I will | 08:10 |
| Laney | xlnt | 08:11 |
| juliank | Laney: I'm not sure what happened to the Cross-Test changes, why are they not committed? | 08:11 |
| Laney | there's a MP and I gave some review comments on there, but they AFAIK didn't get addressed | 08:11 |
| Laney | juliank: perhaps installing a 'trap' once we have an ID of an image-build instance would help | 08:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.6-dfsg-1ubuntu20.04.1 => 6.1.6-dfsg-2ubuntu20.04.1] (no packageset) | 08:15 | |
| Laney | and not referring to instances by name probably | 08:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-hwe [source] (focal-proposed) [6.1.6-dfsg-2ubuntu20.04.1] | 08:15 | |
| juliank | Yeah, like trap "openstack server delete $foo" EXIT | 08:15 |
| Laney | yep | 08:16 |
| juliank | oh well, with nova | 08:16 |
| Laney | I tried to make this all much more robust in the new deploymment | 08:16 |
| Laney | so hopefully it's better $soon | 08:16 |
| juliank | I feel like deleting any leftover instances before booting a new one is probably easiest, though | 08:17 |
| Laney | I would probably do both | 08:18 |
| juliank | haha I was tailing the log and wondering why it did not exit, thinking it was the process itself | 08:19 |
| juliank | amd64 images are uptodate now | 08:20 |
| juliank | Laney: Does the new one also retry? Sometimes we fail on quota and need to retry later | 08:20 |
| juliank | Or maybe we should fix our number of instances we use | 08:20 |
| Laney | check it out in wip/mojo-juju-2 | 08:21 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yaru-theme (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.5 => 20.04.6] (desktop-core) | 08:21 | |
| Laney | there's a lot of retrying going on in there | 08:21 |
| juliank | I think we don't account for building images in parallel to workers running tests | 08:21 |
| juliank | like, building the image probably should pause one worker | 08:21 |
| Laney | and indeed the trap that I just mentioned, forgot I did that! | 08:21 |
| Laney | well we don't usually run at 100% of our quota | 08:22 |
| Laney | because some tests require m1.large | 08:22 |
| juliank | ok, but it's not exactly the first time I saw a quota failure | 08:22 |
| juliank | ERROR (Forbidden): Quota exceeded for cores: Requested 1, but already used 30 of 30 cores (HTTP 403) (Request-ID: req-da4689aa-e861-4852-b4e3-2b8ded1af1a0) | 08:22 |
| Laney | yeah, it's common | 08:22 |
| Laney | I guess one suggestion would be to run the script more frequently - like, hourly - but have it exit 0 if the image it wants to make already exists | 08:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: strace (focal-proposed/main) [4.26-0.2ubuntu3 => 5.5-3ubuntu1] (core) (sync) | 08:30 | |
| wgrant | ooh | 08:32 |
| wgrant | rbalint: Thanks for that, makes my weekend easier. | 08:32 |
| rbalint | please see FFe in LP: #1873409 | 08:33 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1873409 in strace (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Please accept strace 5.5-3ubuntu1 to Focal" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1873409 | 08:33 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (focal-proposed/main) [2:21.0.0~b3~git2020041013.57ff308d6d-0ubuntu1 => 2:21.0.0~b3~git2020041013.57ff308d6d-0ubuntu2] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 08:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0.24.29 => 5.4.0.24.30] (core, kernel) | 08:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected linux-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0.24.30] | 08:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0.24.29 => 5.4.0.24.30] (core, kernel) | 08:53 | |
| sil2100 | Will approve all the langpacks in a moment | 08:54 |
| apw | sil2100, can i have linux-meta first :) | 08:55 |
| apw | else it will take hours to build :) | 08:56 |
| sil2100 | Looking ;) | 08:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0.24.30] | 08:58 | |
| sil2100 | apw: ^ | 08:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (focal-proposed) [2:21.0.0~b3~git2020041013.57ff308d6d-0ubuntu2] | 08:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ironic (focal-proposed/universe) [1:14.0.1~git2020041013.af9e6ba90-0ubuntu1 => 1:14.0.1~git2020041013.af9e6ba90-0ubuntu2] (openstack) | 08:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openmpi (focal-proposed/universe) [4.0.3-0ubuntu1 => 4.0.3-6ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) (sync) | 09:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-calendar (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.0-1 => 3.36.1-0build1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) | 09:06 | |
| cjwatson | Laney: testbed-packages> oh, handy, and thanks juliank | 09:12 |
| cpaelzer | ubuntu-archve: hi the dbgsym seem to be out of date again | 09:56 |
| cjwatson | hi we're already working on it | 09:56 |
| apw | cpaelzer, it is known that ddebs.u.c is lagging and it is ... oh | 09:56 |
| cjwatson | it's not "again", it's still. stalled on 2020-04-02 and we only noticed a couple of days ago, so it has a big backlog | 09:56 |
| cpaelzer | ok cjwatson apw | 09:57 |
| cpaelzer | from my limited POV it was "again", didn't know there was a known lag | 09:57 |
| cjwatson | it's about 50% through the catch-up | 09:57 |
| cpaelzer | ok, thanks then | 09:57 |
| cjwatson | 26 hours in or so | 09:57 |
| cpaelzer | maybe just rechecking on monday then | 09:57 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yaru-theme [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.6] | 09:58 | |
| locutus__ | any archive admin, pleeeeeeeeease remove node-run-sequence from focal see debian bug: #954832 | 10:15 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 954832 in ftp.debian.org "RM: node-run-sequence -- ROM; Deprecated since node-gulp 4" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/954832 | 10:16 |
| locutus__ | ubot5, stop saying that closed bugs are open, thanks | 10:16 |
| ubot5 | locutus__: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :) | 10:16 |
| Laney | Wimpress / popey: (cc sil2100 jibel paride bdmurray): Yo ho de ho, for the release we were thinking of maintaining a 'status whiteboard' on Discourse that people can look at to find out what's going on with respins / bugs / etc. wdyt about giving us a wiki post in the announcements category that we can use for that? | 10:37 |
| jamespage | cpaelzer: I think I can push the jwcrypto dependency from websockify to a suggests which would take MIR pressure off this late in cycle | 10:37 |
| jamespage | testing now | 10:37 |
| Wimpress | Laney, that's a great idea. | 10:38 |
| paride | Laney, +1 | 10:38 |
| philroche | Laney: I'm happy to contribute to that dashboard for cloud images | 10:38 |
| Wimpress | Do you want a reserved wiki post now Laney? | 10:39 |
| Laney | philroche: nice, ok | 10:39 |
| Laney | Wimpress: Yeah, that'd work | 10:39 |
| Laney | if you can make it so that all of those CCed people + philroche can edit | 10:39 |
| Laney | it | 10:39 |
| Wimpress | popey: Can we get together in a bit and set that up? 👆 | 10:40 |
| jamespage | cpaelzer: yep lgtm | 10:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: websockify (focal-proposed/main) [0.9.0-0ubuntu1 => 0.9.0-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server) | 10:43 | |
| jamespage | please can ^^ and the ironic upload I did today be accepted - they should unblock ubuntu-openstack proposed-migration blocks | 10:43 |
| rbalint | sil2100, could strace go in today? | 10:44 |
| sil2100 | rbalint: ouch, that's a big jump | 10:48 |
| Laney | indeed it is | 10:49 |
| Laney | final freeze ... | 10:49 |
| sil2100 | I need to think about it, as this doesn't make me feel very happy | 10:50 |
| rbalint | Laney, sil2100: indeed, it is, please see the FFe | 10:50 |
| rbalint | i'm not sure how far we are from building riscv64 images, but strace is a blocker, i believe | 10:52 |
| sil2100 | rbalint: just for the record: did you look at if it's easy to identify which changes would make the test passing on riscv64? Or would that be hard to determine with all the changes? | 10:54 |
| * Laney hasn't heard anything about images | 10:55 | |
| jamespage | and also the ceph 15.2.1 point release - it includes important upgrade and security fixes :) | 10:55 |
| Laney | I think I lean towards saying that this should be moved to an SRU | 10:55 |
| sil2100 | I mean, I wouldn't mind pulling this into focal in principle somewhen, but doing it so late in the cycle is bad, this has a lot of behavior changes | 10:55 |
| rbalint | sil2100, it seems hard, i have not looked (for 5.5) | 10:56 |
| Laney | then (1) no risk to the focal release, (2) can have explicit verification and it can be rolled back if necessary | 10:57 |
| rbalint | Laney, how would verification look like? | 10:57 |
| Laney | You tell me | 10:58 |
| Laney | how does verification of *this* look like? | 10:58 |
| rbalint | Laney, builds and autopkgtests | 10:58 |
| rbalint | Laney, i'm fine with postponing it to focal+1 | 10:59 |
| rbalint | Laney, interested people can sru later | 11:00 |
| wgrant | strace, being mostly a debugging tool, seems relatively low risk to the release in general. It also doesn't have a massive history of regressions. But yes, big jump. | 11:00 |
| rbalint | yes, imo is it is very low risk, but having old strace in focal missing syscalls is very annoying | 11:01 |
| rbalint | we never had an strace sru/security update per rmadison | 11:02 |
| juliank | just add the syscalls? | 11:02 |
| popey | Wimpress sure thing | 11:03 |
| rbalint | juliank, if someone else is interested i would not block her/him, but i'm not interested at all doing it , rather use strace from a ppa | 11:03 |
| rbalint | how about having strace in -proposed but not letting it in until after the release? then riscv64 bootstrap can continue | 11:05 |
| sil2100 | I think this might be an option | 11:05 |
| Laney | sounds possible | 11:06 |
| sil2100 | It's unlikely we'd have to do any release-blocking hotfixes for strace | 11:06 |
| wgrant | I need to drop -proposed from the chroots for at least a bit to finish the haskell and rust trees because -proposed is a bit of a mess, but yeah, makes sense | 11:06 |
| Laney | So we've definitely had strace being the cause of build failures / autopkgtest failures (more so these) in the past | 11:07 |
| sil2100 | Oh, we did? | 11:07 |
| Laney | It's the kind of thing that I don't want to risk us having with not much time to get things aligned | 11:07 |
| Laney | it should be ok in -proposed for the autopkgtest side, as this strace won't be pulled in unless requested | 11:07 |
| rbalint | Laney, the test rebuilds and bileto tests should have minimized the potential disruption | 11:08 |
| sil2100 | Yeah, +1 - guess it would be easiest if we had the bug number attached in the changelog | 11:08 |
| Laney | yeah but we know that we only catch first level regressions by these methods | 11:08 |
| sil2100 | Though I guess I can just do a block hint for it | 11:08 |
| Laney | that's most of our problems in autopkgtest-land | 11:08 |
| Laney | anyway I think blocking is ok | 11:09 |
| Laney | if we do hit problems, it can always be removed then | 11:09 |
| sil2100 | Laney: I'll look at the diff, add a block hint and accept | 11:09 |
| Laney | nod | 11:09 |
| rbalint | sil2100, thanks! | 11:09 |
| jbicha | ubuntu-archive please take a look at removal requests bug 1872598 and bug 1872593 | 11:14 |
| ubot5 | bug 1872598 in ipython-py2 (Ubuntu) "Please remove ipython-py2 from Ubuntu" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1872598 | 11:14 |
| ubot5 | bug 1872593 in dh-kpatches (Ubuntu) "Please remove dh-kpatches from Ubuntu" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1872593 | 11:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: horizon (focal-proposed/main) [3:18.2.1~git2020041013.754804667-0ubuntu1 => 3:18.2.1~git2020041013.754804667-0ubuntu2] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 11:17 | |
| Laney | sil2100: so about the discourse thing, some of the sections on the release document should move over there I think | 11:20 |
| sil2100 | Laney: ah, the discourse thread? | 11:20 |
| sil2100 | For release? | 11:21 |
| Laney | yeah | 11:21 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pepperflashplugin-nonfree (focal-proposed/multiverse) [1.8.4ubuntu2 => 1.8.6ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 11:21 | |
| Laney | status summary / current blockers / bugs to watch ? | 11:21 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pepperflashplugin-nonfree [source] (focal-proposed) [1.8.6ubuntu1] | 11:21 | |
| Laney | if you agree, I'll do that and add a link once the post is created | 11:22 |
| sil2100 | Laney: +1 on that - did you create that thread already? Could you paste the link once you have it? | 11:23 |
| Laney | see ^ - Wimpres_s and pope_y are on it | 11:23 |
| sil2100 | This will be something new for me as I never was a discourse person ;) | 11:23 |
| Laney | ah, you can have 'wiki posts', so it'll not be too un-familiar for you | 11:24 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted strace [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.5-3ubuntu1] | 11:25 | |
| sil2100 | jamespage: holy shit 9MB of diff for ceph | 11:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (focal-proposed/main) [2:16.0.0~b3~git2020041516.5f42488a9a-0ubuntu1 => 2:16.0.0~b3~git2020041516.5f42488a9a-0ubuntu2] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 11:30 | |
| sil2100 | jamespage: the changelog in the diff has much more changes than the ones listed on the diff - whyyy is this so late | 11:31 |
| sil2100 | eh, let me try that again | 11:33 |
| sil2100 | jamespage: the changelog in the diff has much more changes than the ones listed on the bug - whyyy is this so late | 11:33 |
| jamespage | sil2100: sorry which one? | 11:34 |
| sil2100 | jbicha: looking at some of those in a moment | 11:34 |
| jamespage | the ceph diff? | 11:34 |
| jamespage | sil2100: do you mean the list in doc/releases/octopus.rst ? I think upstream did a catchup in the docs from the 15.1.0 beta release between 15.2.0 and 15.2.1 | 11:39 |
| jamespage | sil2100: this point release only appeared this week and it takes me a while to validate due to build times | 11:40 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cinnamon (focal-proposed/universe) [4.4.8-3 => 4.4.8-4] (no packageset) (sync) | 11:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cinnamon [sync] (focal-proposed) [4.4.8-4] | 11:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (focal-proposed) [3:18.2.1~git2020041013.754804667-0ubuntu2] | 12:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (focal-proposed) [2:16.0.0~b3~git2020041516.5f42488a9a-0ubuntu2] | 12:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ironic [source] (focal-proposed) [1:14.0.1~git2020041013.af9e6ba90-0ubuntu2] | 12:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pdfchain (focal-proposed/universe) [1:0.4.4.2-1build1 => 1:0.4.4.2-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 12:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pdfchain [sync] (focal-proposed) [1:0.4.4.2-2] | 12:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: balsa (focal-proposed/universe) [2.5.9-4 => 2.6.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 12:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted balsa [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.6.0-2] | 12:02 | |
| * sil2100 AFK for lunch | 12:06 | |
| Wimpress | Laney: Re: release wiki post on Discourse. Do you want people to be able to comment? | 12:17 |
| Laney | Wimpress: ideally not, we don't want to be replying there really | 12:17 |
| kanashiro | could someone please take a look at this MP to unblock mysql-8.0? https://code.launchpad.net/~lucaskanashiro/britney/hint-update-mysql-connector-c++/+merge/382246 | 12:19 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-lts (focal-proposed/main) [11.0.7+10-2ubuntu1 => 11.0.7+10-3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync) | 12:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-8 (focal-proposed/universe) [8u252-b09-1 => 8u252-b09-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) (sync) | 12:30 | |
| Wimpress | Laney: Here's your topic - https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/focal-fossa-final-release-status-tracking/15366 | 12:34 |
| Wimpress | Release team members have write access to that category. | 12:34 |
| Wimpress | When that post has something in it, I will pin it. | 12:34 |
| Laney | Wimpress: Ta duck | 12:35 |
| Laney | ooh | 12:42 |
| Laney | it copies from google docs with proper formatting | 12:42 |
| Laney | ok filled out with some initial content | 12:47 |
| Wimpress | Great. | 12:47 |
| Laney | sil2100: want to check you can edit that? | 12:48 |
| Wimpress | sil2100: I could not find you in Discourse. So let me know your username. | 12:49 |
| Wimpress | Laney: Post globally pinned until 23:59 on April 24th. | 12:50 |
| Laney | 😎 | 12:51 |
| Laney | Wimpress: popey:: Another idea for that category might be a post with some links giving people info on how to contribute to the release (testing), then I could link to it from the top of this wiki post | 12:51 |
| Laney | Or maybe in the Quality category and we link to that as a place for testers to gather | 12:52 |
| Laney | (if you like, just edit the release post and add a short sentence linking people to where you want them to go) | 12:53 |
| popey | Knock yourself out :D | 12:57 |
| Laney | sorry, to remove that doubt, I'm suggesting but not volunteering to write that content I'm afraid :-) | 12:59 |
| === Laney changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: Bionic 18.04.4, Eoan 19.10 | Archive: Final Freeze | Focal release status: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/focal-fossa-final-release-status-tracking/15366 | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Focal Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or gin | melius malum quod cognoscis | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: stress-ng (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.05.23-1ubuntu3 => 0.05.23-1ubuntu4] (no packageset) | 13:10 | |
| jibel | Laney, there is this post which already links to testing resources and daily builds https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/testing-ubuntu-20-04-lts-official-ubuntu-flavors/14053 | 13:21 |
| tjaalton | Laney: hey, did you see my updates to the vulkan ffe? | 13:26 |
| sil2100 | Laney: thanks! Let me first try logging in | 13:40 |
| sil2100 | Laney, Wimpress: ok, I actually didn't even have an account - I have now created it | 13:41 |
| sil2100 | Wimpress: can you try adding me now? | 13:42 |
| philroche | Wimpress: Should I be able to edit that post directly to update cloud image status? I don't seem to have perms to do so .. or is it pulling the updates from elsewhere? | 13:54 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjdk-8 [sync] (focal-proposed) [8u252-b09-1ubuntu1] | 13:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjdk-lts [sync] (focal-proposed) [11.0.7+10-3ubuntu1] | 13:55 | |
| apw | sil2100, you ok with an update to the oem-5.6 kernel ? | 14:12 |
| sil2100 | ...we don't have it on any images now, right? | 14:13 |
| Laney | sure we do | 14:13 |
| xnox | apw: i will upload ubiquity in a moment..... so yeah, they will respin. | 14:14 |
| xnox | Laney: sil2100: vorlon: paride reports that ssh -i /var/lib/jenkins/.ssh/cdimage cdimage@nusakan.canonical.com '/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/bin/mark-current -p ubuntu-server -s focal -t legacy-server -a amd64 20200417' | 14:14 |
| xnox | fails | 14:14 |
| xnox | when i run something similar, on my local machine..... it works. | 14:15 |
| xnox | is there something missing? like clearing out the old 'focal-server-arm64.iso' from current & pending? | 14:15 |
| xnox | or rather is stray published | 14:15 |
| paride | xnox, did you try with "-t legacy-server" ? | 14:15 |
| xnox | paride: yes. | 14:16 |
| sil2100 | xnox: let me run that on nusakan and see how it fails | 14:16 |
| xnox | Laney: sil2100: vorlon: I think it is bad that "server" builds are listed on http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily/current/ together with "legacy-server" builds. | 14:16 |
| xnox | paride: but my local deployment has no "server.iso" builds. | 14:16 |
| paride | sil2100, https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/m9cqKMmxjK/ | 14:16 |
| sil2100 | huh | 14:16 |
| paride | sil2100, note that is was passed "-a amd64" but still looks for an arm64 image | 14:17 |
| sil2100 | Need to see what current is right now, as I purged the old images from the latest publish directory | 14:17 |
| sil2100 | paride, xnox: I think I see the reason | 14:18 |
| sil2100 | paride: can you try now? | 14:19 |
| apw | xnox, so are you happier if i drop it in now, rather than waiting ? | 14:19 |
| xnox | sil2100: the tree looks better! | 14:20 |
| xnox | apw: yeah, but oem kernel respins are cheap. It is only on the /pool => such that we can rebuild desktop iso, without rebuilding livefs. | 14:20 |
| sil2100 | xnox: yeah, stupid current was a mixture of different publish sets, and some were actually invalid symlinks because of my earlier purge | 14:20 |
| xnox | apw: it simply would redownload the old squashfs, and redo debian-cd add packages to the pool. | 14:20 |
| xnox | apw: ditto e.g. nvidia-* | 14:20 |
| apw | xnox, ok then i will dump it in | 14:21 |
| xnox | sil2100: ful! | 14:21 |
| xnox | sil2100: fun! | 14:21 |
| sil2100 | apw: yeah, throw it at us | 14:21 |
| apw | sil2100, if you are in agreement | 14:21 |
| Laney | apw: you know you're not talking to a release team member for these acks right | 14:21 |
| * Laney sees sneaky xnox | 14:21 | |
| sil2100 | ;) | 14:21 |
| apw | Laney, which is why i am deferring to sil2100 :) | 14:21 |
| sil2100 | Oh, actually apw is a release team member, so he can ACK himself?! | 14:22 |
| apw | sil2100, but one should not really count ones own ack in this context me thinks | 14:22 |
| Laney | ok good | 14:22 |
| paride | sil2100, mark-current -p ubuntu-server -s focal -t legacy-server -a amd64 20200417: success | 14:22 |
| Laney | what is this new oem kernel for, out of interest? | 14:22 |
| paride | thanks! | 14:22 |
| apw | Laney, fixes for graphics and the like for supported platforms | 14:22 |
| apw | Laney, and we get to make one last choice with britney yet | 14:24 |
| sil2100 | Laney: here's the changes file: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/474833166/linux-oem-5.6_5.6.0-1008.8_source.changes | 14:24 |
| apw | by our standards tiny | 14:25 |
| sil2100 | I'd prefer not having a new release of that, but the GPU fixes sound legit... | 14:25 |
| Laney | fair enough | 14:28 |
| Laney | I was expecting it to be revved along with the GA kernel on that cadence but I just assumed that | 14:28 |
| Laney | guess we're considering that kernel freeze only applies to the default kernel | 14:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dbus-c++ (focal-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-8.1build1 => 0.9.0-8.1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntustudio) | 14:30 | |
| apw | Laney, it is a newer base, so yeah. but we can hold this in -proposed and release it after too | 14:30 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: atk1.0 (focal-proposed/main) [2.35.1-1ubuntu1 => 2.35.1-1ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 14:31 | |
| Laney | nod | 14:34 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dbus-c++ [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.0-8.1ubuntu1] | 14:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted websockify [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.0-0ubuntu2] | 14:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted atk1.0 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.35.1-1ubuntu2] | 14:37 | |
| sforshee | sil2100, Laney: fyi I'm respining the kernel for a couple of install-related issues | 14:38 |
| sforshee | just the primary kernel, no derivatives | 14:38 |
| Laney | sforshee: ok, eta? | 14:40 |
| sforshee | Laney: I'm test building now, should upload within the hour | 14:40 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1020.21] (core, kernel) | 14:41 | |
| sil2100 | sforshee: thanks for the heads up o/ | 14:42 |
| Laney | probably be spinning images later than my normal EOD then! | 14:42 |
| bdmurray | remember there's somebody in a different TZ who can help! ;-) | 14:43 |
| sforshee | sil2100, Laney: we usually use a build ppa, would be eaiser this time if I just upload to -proposed instead? | 14:43 |
| sforshee | *would it | 14:43 |
| * apw would lean to the PPA as it gives us one more chance to not take it | 14:44 | |
| sil2100 | sforshee: let's keep the PPA approach | 14:45 |
| sforshee | ack | 14:45 |
| sil2100 | We already recommended that for other bigger things | 14:45 |
| Laney | yeah it doesn't add much delay | 14:45 |
| sil2100 | And we can deal with bin-sync in such cases, since we're expecting those and know where to look | 14:46 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-1020.21] | 14:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: collectd (focal-proposed/universe) [5.9.2.g-1ubuntu4 => 5.9.2.g-1ubuntu5] (no packageset) | 14:50 | |
| sil2100 | I'm pushing some NBS fixes if anything ^ | 14:50 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted collectd [source] (focal-proposed) [5.9.2.g-1ubuntu5] | 14:51 | |
| sil2100 | Only few more left \o/ | 14:51 |
| sforshee | new kernel is building, should be done in ~8 hours | 15:04 |
| xnox | Laney: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/vZX45YS8fB/ | 15:09 |
| xnox | Laney: so, should i just upload this, or do i need to explain my head bashing aobut this? | 15:09 |
| Laney | xnox: If you have more explanation, put it in the changelog itself so that future students can study your thoughts | 15:11 |
| bdmurray | jibel: Have you looked at these upgrade (automatic testing) failures at all? | 15:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: automake-1.15 (focal-proposed/universe) [1:1.15.1-5ubuntu1 => 1:1.15.1-5ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 15:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted automake-1.15 [source] (focal-proposed) [1:1.15.1-5ubuntu2] | 15:21 | |
| sil2100 | cjwatson, stgraber: hey guys, need a quick opinion about something: I want to get rid of the last thing from the NBS report - basically the whole libopencl-clang-dev libopencl-clang9 libllvmspirvlib9 chain - basically both libllvmspirvlib9 and libopencl-clang9 can be safely removed as this is all caused by a dangling old version of libopencl-clang-dev (9.0.0-1build1) | 15:45 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson, stgraber: so I'm wondering, why is libopencl-clang-dev both 10.0.0-2 and 9.0.0-1build1 visible still? There is no reverse-dependency explicitly depending on the old version, so I'd assume the binary should be superseeded and no longer visible | 15:46 |
| sil2100 | Should I also remove the 10.0.0-2 libopencl-clang-dev binary package manually in this case? | 15:46 |
| sil2100 | eh, I mean, remove 9.0.0-1build1 | 15:46 |
| sil2100 | Or will everything go fine when I simply remove the chain of libopencl-clang9 and libllvmspirvlib9 ? I guess maybe that's holding it in somehow | 15:47 |
| locutus__ | the clang approach for NBS stuff is usually do it an cross fingers :D | 15:48 |
| locutus__ | in this case, they are not provided by llvm-defaults, so you should be good to let them go, I'm not even sure why they existed in first place, maybe some sync from experimental | 15:50 |
| locutus__ | oh indeed, they are not provided by llvm-* so meh | 15:51 |
| cjwatson | libopencl-clang-dev is Architecture: all, so LP conservatively keeps it around as long as any arch-dependent binaries from the same source and version are still active | 15:51 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: oh! | 15:51 |
| cjwatson | you shouldn't need to remove it manually | 15:51 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: ok, so it will resolve itself once I remove the other two, thanks! Yeah, this makes total sense | 15:52 |
| cjwatson | it'll be automatically superseded by the dominator once the other binaries are gone | 15:52 |
| cjwatson | right | 15:52 |
| locutus__ | Package: libopencl-clang-dev | 15:52 |
| locutus__ | Architecture: amd64 i386 | 15:52 |
| locutus__ | not anymore fortunately | 15:52 |
| cjwatson | right, it was arch: all at version 9.0.0-1build1 | 15:52 |
| locutus__ | yep :) | 15:52 |
| locutus__ | also debian tracker is confused by it | 15:53 |
| sil2100 | Thanks guys | 15:55 |
| sil2100 | Ok, so hopefully when stuff migrates, we'll be able to remove the last NBS binaries and we'll have a clean report | 15:55 |
| Laney | sil2100: next: focal_uninst.txt :-) | 15:57 |
| sil2100 | :( | 15:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.663 => 2.664] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) | 16:08 | |
| rcj | Could I get a review of livecd-rootfs in the queue? | 16:10 |
| sil2100 | Wimpress: hey! Can you give me the powers now to edit that post? ;) | 16:28 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664] | 16:28 | |
| sil2100 | jamespage: ok, looking at ceph now again | 16:31 |
| sil2100 | jamespage: so as said the diff is huge, 9MB, and I guess I see a lot of huge directories being added - just wanted to make sure that's correct | 16:32 |
| Laney | xnox: you going to upload that soon? | 16:32 |
| Laney | please close bug #1873434 when you do | 16:32 |
| ubot5 | bug 1873434 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Focal) "default kernel left installed on systems which use oem kernel" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1873434 | 16:32 |
| xnox | Laney: yes. | 16:33 |
| sil2100 | jamespage: there's like src/rocksdb added and src/civetweb and those seem to have like super a lot of source files | 16:33 |
| Laney | merci merci | 16:33 |
| jamespage | sil2100: reviewing now | 16:33 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.13 => 20.04.14] (core) | 16:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (focal-proposed/main) [1.448 => 1.449] (core) | 16:35 | |
| xnox | paride: did things work, or not? | 16:35 |
| xnox | paride: sil2100: should sil2100 mark all latests builds as current himself? cause then he will see what's broken | 16:36 |
| xnox | sil2100: can you please ./bin/mark-current for -t legacy-server for 20200417 for all 4 arches? | 16:37 |
| xnox | Laney: ubiquity uploaded | 16:37 |
| Laney | xnox: R O C K O N | 16:38 |
| paride | yes xnox it works now, but for the other archs the jobs still have to run. UTAH needs to be rebuilt | 16:38 |
| paride | but the promotion worked | 16:38 |
| xnox | paride: ah cool! | 16:39 |
| xnox | sil2100: unping | 16:39 |
| sil2100 | ;) | 16:40 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-calendar [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.1-0build1] | 16:43 | |
| jamespage | sil2100: leave it with me - I had a load of exclusions in d/copyright that have somehow got dropped between 15.2.0 and 15.2.1 | 16:47 |
| jamespage | hence the stupid diff | 16:47 |
| Laney | xnox: no idea how having "${OEM_KERNEL}" there causes the default kernel to remain installed | 16:51 |
| Laney | voodoo | 16:51 |
| jamespage | sil2100: would you like to reject that version and I'll have another run at it... | 16:52 |
| sil2100 | jamespage: ok o/ | 16:54 |
| sil2100 | jamespage: rejected, give me a poke when you re-upload o/ | 16:55 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ceph [source] (focal-proposed) [15.2.1-0ubuntu1] | 16:55 | |
| jamespage | me listens to xz running his fans hard | 16:58 |
| bdmurray | Shouldn't we just stop listing Eoan as active on the isotracker? | 16:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-launchpadlib (focal-proposed/main) [1.10.11-1 => 1.10.12-1] (core) (sync) | 17:11 | |
| cjwatson | ^- should fix autopkgtests | 17:13 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxc [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.0.2-0ubuntu1] | 17:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.14] | 17:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-launchpadlib [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.10.12-1] | 17:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [1.449] | 17:16 | |
| Laney | bdmurray: ok I updated the discourse with the packages that I think we should wait for before spinning | 17:24 |
| Laney | going now | 17:24 |
| bdmurray | Laney: ack, thanks! | 17:24 |
| philroche | bdmurray: Laney: Wimpress: Can CPC team have edit access to the post too so we can update cloud image build progress? myself and rcj if possible. | 17:26 |
| sil2100 | Laney: o/ | 17:34 |
| Laney | philroche: can't help with that, sorry | 17:37 |
| Laney | bdmurray: sil2100: btw there's an autopkgtest backlog and quite a few things waiting in proposed | 17:37 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virt-manager (focal-proposed/universe) [1:2.2.1-3ubuntu1 => 1:2.2.1-3ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 17:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virt-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1:2.2.1-3ubuntu2] | 17:38 | |
| Laney | we're probably going to want to make a call on remaining things on monday, and I guess punt some of them to SRUs | 17:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.6-dfsg-1 => 6.1.6-dfsg-2] (ubuntu-cloud) (sync) | 17:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.6.0-1008.8] (no packageset) | 17:56 | |
| sil2100 | Laney: yeah | 18:03 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spirv-headers (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5.1-4 => 1.5.1+git20200409-1] (i386-whitelist) (sync) | 18:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spirv-tools (focal-proposed/universe) [2020.1-2 => 2020.2-1] (i386-whitelist) (sync) | 18:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vulkan-loader (focal-proposed/main) [1.2.131.2-1 => 1.2.135.0-2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) (sync) | 18:31 | |
| tjaalton | synced these ^ back for the ffe | 18:31 |
| jamespage | sil2100: OK re-uploading - I think I've got it right now... | 19:10 |
| jamespage | (ceph that is) | 19:10 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (focal-proposed/main) [15.2.0-0ubuntu2 => 15.2.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 19:12 | |
| cjwatson | Bah, http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/p/python-launchpadlib/focal/amd64 still failing. Not sure I'll manage to cram this into focal now :-/ | 19:16 |
| cjwatson | ddstreet: ^- FYI | 19:16 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxd (focal-proposed/universe) [1:0.8 => 1:0.9] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server) | 20:04 | |
| stgraber | ^ this is a tiny change but apparently quite critical for LTS to LTS upgrade on WSL | 20:04 |
| stgraber | (the lxd deb isn't seeded, this is used during upgrades only to switch over to the snap) | 20:04 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxcfs (focal-proposed/universe) [4.0.2-0ubuntu1 => 4.0.3-0ubuntu1] (edubuntu) | 20:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxcfs [source] (focal-proposed) [4.0.3-0ubuntu1] | 20:46 | |
| matlock | ^lxd We discovered in testing under some circumstances a user who upgraded from 16.04 to 18.04 and then upgrades to 20.04 on WSL would have their upgrade stall and could leave them with a broken system. This patch better handles that scenario. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntuwsl/+bug/1862550 | 20:47 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1862550 in Ubuntu WSL "Upgrading to 20.04 Attempts to Install LXD via Snap Store" [Critical,Fix committed] | 20:47 |
| rbalint | vorlon, could you please merge https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/382530 for glibc? the rest seems just flakiness | 21:01 |
| xnox | matlock: ok.... do you have a question? | 21:11 |
| xnox | matlock: did you want to open a bugtask against "lxd" package in Ubuntu project for the focal series? | 21:11 |
| vorlon | rbalint: done | 21:15 |
| xnox | matlock: nevermind, i see the request from stgraber now. | 21:17 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.7 => 1:20.04.9] (core) | 22:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: gnome-shell-extension-dashtodock (focal-proposed/primary) [67+git20200225-1] | 22:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-workspaces-to-dock (focal-proposed/universe) [52-1 => 52+git20200318-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 22:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-workspaces-to-dock [sync] (focal-proposed) [52+git20200318-1] | 22:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.9] | 22:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor (focal-proposed/universe) [38-2 => 38+git20200414-32cc79e-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 22:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor [sync] (focal-proposed) [38+git20200414-32cc79e-1] | 22:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: valentina (focal-proposed/universe) [0.6.1~dfsg-9build1 => 0.6.1~dfsg-10] (no packageset) (sync) | 23:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted valentina [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.6.1~dfsg-10] | 23:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ceph [source] (focal-proposed) [15.2.1-0ubuntu1] | 23:48 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!