[00:00] jbicha: ...Or you could cheat and just add the provides to current debhelper, but that seems less than ideal. [00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 [source] (focal-proposed) [440.82+really.440.64-0ubuntu4] [00:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 (focal-proposed/restricted) [440.82-0ubuntu1 => 440.82+really.440.64-0ubuntu4] (i386-whitelist) [00:44] jbicha: it was rejected. [00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.661 => 2.663] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) [00:45] cjwatson: the one thing that is not nice, is that teh VMs are "upgraded" daily [00:45] meaning one cannot quiete rebuild them independantly without knowing when/what they upgraded things to [00:49] TBH even just getting a list of installed package names and versions from one of those VMs would be helpful [00:50] git clone lp:autopkgtest-cloud [00:50] has ./tools/build-adt-image-all-clouds [00:50] If you can launch a VM from it do you think you could extract the output of "dpkg-query -W"? [00:50] But I'll look at that too, thanks [00:51] which does call from $ pull-lp-source autopkgtest => calls setup-commands/setup-testbed [00:51] which does a lot [00:51] like installing dbus & installing libpam-systemd [00:51] potentially triggering session auditing and what not. [00:51] dbus could well be relevant [00:51] cjwatson: right, but i'm about to sleep. Will do that for you tomorrow. Unless someone beats me to it. i.e. juliank maybe. [00:53] also gpg is installed [00:53] which means that systemd- user session jobs are probably started [00:53] Thanks, me too. Will see how far I get [01:08] bdmurray: nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 now build- and install-tested; I'll self-accept after a couple of hours if no one else is available to review [01:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.1-3ubuntu2 => 3.36.1-3ubuntu3] (desktop-core, desktop-extra) === dax is now known as housecat [01:35] Ah, maybe I see the launchpadlib bug by zen debugging [01:44] Possibly https://code.launchpad.net/~cjwatson/launchpadlib/postpone-keyring-errors-import/+merge/382465 [05:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 [source] (focal-proposed) [440.82+really.440.64-0ubuntu4] [05:28] cjwatson: for "exact images we use for autopkgtest" in one of such cases that I had (local autopkgtest-buildvm-ubuntu-cloud) didn't reproduce it - someone (IIRC Laney) was able to upload the image used in the tests into canonistack [05:28] cjwatson: that way I was able to spawn exactly what the tests used [05:29] I read the backlog and was unsure if you got to a solution already, if you did please ignore the noise [05:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.662] [05:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.663] [06:38] does anyone know how we there is so much backlog on autopkgtest? [06:38] we are in freeze, it's not like we had synced half of the archive or done a python transition [06:42] I guess glibc which triggers the world of tests under 'huge' is part of it? [06:57] rikMills, right, I guess that could be it, unfortunate that one update can DoS the infra for over a day :-/ [07:03] I guess at least it limits the immediate worker availability for !huge things. [07:03] * RikMills shrugs [07:20] ugh [07:24] Laney: Apparently we got stuck with duplicate servers again in l{cy,gw}01, so we did not get updated images for a week [07:24] Really gotta add some error reporting _somewhere_ [07:29] cjwatson: So, dpkg -l on the autopkgtest image https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/NvQqMTKjGC/ [07:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (focal-proposed/main) [15.2.0-0ubuntu2 => 15.2.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [07:35] I'll build some new focal images for amd64 [07:39] * juliank accidentally overwrote the logs for the other image builds [07:40] lgw is exceeding quota, and hence, not building [07:40] trying by hand [07:42] So I guess modifying create-nova-image-new-release to delete any server with the same name as the one we're about to create will solve the issue [07:42] I think the script is exiting somewhere due to set -e and not reaching the part where it does the removing [07:43] Also, I hacked the script to not build i386 images on focal anymore [07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mutter [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.1-3ubuntu3] [07:51] hm, this is weird [07:53] seb128: so I ran my langpack sanity tests and noticed that most of the new base refreshes are basically dropping snapd-glib.po [07:56] Ah, ok, I see the translation strings are completely different now [07:56] Which is why probably most languages didn't translate it [07:56] sil2100, right, it was not properly set for translation until yesterday :-/ [08:00] seb128: ACK [08:01] I also see we MoinMoin.po and JabberBot.po being dropped in comparison to the last base refresh, but I suppose it's due to moin being removed from the archive [08:01] likely [08:02] Anyway, thanks for the info, I'll start the upload process of those packs [08:06] juliank: hacked> please commit it [08:06] I'm not happy with the cowboys we're building up there [08:10] cjwatson: if you change log.gz in your url to artifacts.tar.gz there's a 'testbed-packages' in there which is the stuff that was preinstalled in the testbed itself, perhaps that's useful to you [08:10] Laney: I will [08:11] xlnt [08:11] Laney: I'm not sure what happened to the Cross-Test changes, why are they not committed? [08:11] there's a MP and I gave some review comments on there, but they AFAIK didn't get addressed [08:15] juliank: perhaps installing a 'trap' once we have an ID of an image-build instance would help [08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.6-dfsg-1ubuntu20.04.1 => 6.1.6-dfsg-2ubuntu20.04.1] (no packageset) [08:15] and not referring to instances by name probably [08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-hwe [source] (focal-proposed) [6.1.6-dfsg-2ubuntu20.04.1] [08:15] Yeah, like trap "openstack server delete $foo" EXIT [08:16] yep [08:16] oh well, with nova [08:16] I tried to make this all much more robust in the new deploymment [08:16] so hopefully it's better $soon [08:17] I feel like deleting any leftover instances before booting a new one is probably easiest, though [08:18] I would probably do both [08:19] haha I was tailing the log and wondering why it did not exit, thinking it was the process itself [08:20] amd64 images are uptodate now [08:20] Laney: Does the new one also retry? Sometimes we fail on quota and need to retry later [08:20] Or maybe we should fix our number of instances we use [08:21] check it out in wip/mojo-juju-2 [08:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yaru-theme (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.5 => 20.04.6] (desktop-core) [08:21] there's a lot of retrying going on in there [08:21] I think we don't account for building images in parallel to workers running tests [08:21] like, building the image probably should pause one worker [08:21] and indeed the trap that I just mentioned, forgot I did that! [08:22] well we don't usually run at 100% of our quota [08:22] because some tests require m1.large [08:22] ok, but it's not exactly the first time I saw a quota failure [08:22] ERROR (Forbidden): Quota exceeded for cores: Requested 1, but already used 30 of 30 cores (HTTP 403) (Request-ID: req-da4689aa-e861-4852-b4e3-2b8ded1af1a0) [08:22] yeah, it's common [08:23] I guess one suggestion would be to run the script more frequently - like, hourly - but have it exit 0 if the image it wants to make already exists [08:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: strace (focal-proposed/main) [4.26-0.2ubuntu3 => 5.5-3ubuntu1] (core) (sync) [08:32] ooh [08:32] rbalint: Thanks for that, makes my weekend easier. [08:33] please see FFe in LP: #1873409 [08:33] Launchpad bug 1873409 in strace (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Please accept strace 5.5-3ubuntu1 to Focal" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1873409 [08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (focal-proposed/main) [2:21.0.0~b3~git2020041013.57ff308d6d-0ubuntu1 => 2:21.0.0~b3~git2020041013.57ff308d6d-0ubuntu2] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [08:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0.24.29 => 5.4.0.24.30] (core, kernel) [08:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected linux-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0.24.30] [08:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0.24.29 => 5.4.0.24.30] (core, kernel) [08:54] Will approve all the langpacks in a moment [08:55] sil2100, can i have linux-meta first :) [08:56] else it will take hours to build :) [08:56] Looking ;) [08:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0.24.30] [08:59] apw: ^ [08:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (focal-proposed) [2:21.0.0~b3~git2020041013.57ff308d6d-0ubuntu2] [08:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ironic (focal-proposed/universe) [1:14.0.1~git2020041013.af9e6ba90-0ubuntu1 => 1:14.0.1~git2020041013.af9e6ba90-0ubuntu2] (openstack) [09:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openmpi (focal-proposed/universe) [4.0.3-0ubuntu1 => 4.0.3-6ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) (sync) [09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-calendar (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.0-1 => 3.36.1-0build1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) [09:12] Laney: testbed-packages> oh, handy, and thanks juliank [09:56] ubuntu-archve: hi the dbgsym seem to be out of date again [09:56] hi we're already working on it [09:56] cpaelzer, it is known that ddebs.u.c is lagging and it is ... oh [09:56] it's not "again", it's still. stalled on 2020-04-02 and we only noticed a couple of days ago, so it has a big backlog [09:57] ok cjwatson apw [09:57] from my limited POV it was "again", didn't know there was a known lag [09:57] it's about 50% through the catch-up [09:57] ok, thanks then [09:57] 26 hours in or so [09:57] maybe just rechecking on monday then [09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yaru-theme [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.6] [10:15] any archive admin, pleeeeeeeeease remove node-run-sequence from focal see debian bug: #954832 [10:16] Debian bug 954832 in ftp.debian.org "RM: node-run-sequence -- ROM; Deprecated since node-gulp 4" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/954832 [10:16] ubot5, stop saying that closed bugs are open, thanks [10:16] locutus__: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :) [10:37] Wimpress / popey: (cc sil2100 jibel paride bdmurray): Yo ho de ho, for the release we were thinking of maintaining a 'status whiteboard' on Discourse that people can look at to find out what's going on with respins / bugs / etc. wdyt about giving us a wiki post in the announcements category that we can use for that? [10:37] cpaelzer: I think I can push the jwcrypto dependency from websockify to a suggests which would take MIR pressure off this late in cycle [10:37] testing now [10:38] Laney, that's a great idea. [10:38] Laney, +1 [10:38] Laney: I'm happy to contribute to that dashboard for cloud images [10:39] Do you want a reserved wiki post now Laney? [10:39] philroche: nice, ok [10:39] Wimpress: Yeah, that'd work [10:39] if you can make it so that all of those CCed people + philroche can edit [10:39] it [10:40] popey: Can we get together in a bit and set that up? 👆 [10:41] cpaelzer: yep lgtm [10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: websockify (focal-proposed/main) [0.9.0-0ubuntu1 => 0.9.0-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server) [10:43] please can ^^ and the ironic upload I did today be accepted - they should unblock ubuntu-openstack proposed-migration blocks [10:44] sil2100, could strace go in today? [10:48] rbalint: ouch, that's a big jump [10:49] indeed it is [10:49] final freeze ... [10:50] I need to think about it, as this doesn't make me feel very happy [10:50] Laney, sil2100: indeed, it is, please see the FFe [10:52] i'm not sure how far we are from building riscv64 images, but strace is a blocker, i believe [10:54] rbalint: just for the record: did you look at if it's easy to identify which changes would make the test passing on riscv64? Or would that be hard to determine with all the changes? [10:55] * Laney hasn't heard anything about images [10:55] and also the ceph 15.2.1 point release - it includes important upgrade and security fixes :) [10:55] I think I lean towards saying that this should be moved to an SRU [10:55] I mean, I wouldn't mind pulling this into focal in principle somewhen, but doing it so late in the cycle is bad, this has a lot of behavior changes [10:56] sil2100, it seems hard, i have not looked (for 5.5) [10:57] then (1) no risk to the focal release, (2) can have explicit verification and it can be rolled back if necessary [10:57] Laney, how would verification look like? [10:58] You tell me [10:58] how does verification of *this* look like? [10:58] Laney, builds and autopkgtests [10:59] Laney, i'm fine with postponing it to focal+1 [11:00] Laney, interested people can sru later [11:00] strace, being mostly a debugging tool, seems relatively low risk to the release in general. It also doesn't have a massive history of regressions. But yes, big jump. [11:01] yes, imo is it is very low risk, but having old strace in focal missing syscalls is very annoying [11:02] we never had an strace sru/security update per rmadison [11:02] just add the syscalls? [11:03] Wimpress sure thing [11:03] juliank, if someone else is interested i would not block her/him, but i'm not interested at all doing it , rather use strace from a ppa [11:05] how about having strace in -proposed but not letting it in until after the release? then riscv64 bootstrap can continue [11:05] I think this might be an option [11:06] sounds possible [11:06] It's unlikely we'd have to do any release-blocking hotfixes for strace [11:06] I need to drop -proposed from the chroots for at least a bit to finish the haskell and rust trees because -proposed is a bit of a mess, but yeah, makes sense [11:07] So we've definitely had strace being the cause of build failures / autopkgtest failures (more so these) in the past [11:07] Oh, we did? [11:07] It's the kind of thing that I don't want to risk us having with not much time to get things aligned [11:07] it should be ok in -proposed for the autopkgtest side, as this strace won't be pulled in unless requested [11:08] Laney, the test rebuilds and bileto tests should have minimized the potential disruption [11:08] Yeah, +1 - guess it would be easiest if we had the bug number attached in the changelog [11:08] yeah but we know that we only catch first level regressions by these methods [11:08] Though I guess I can just do a block hint for it [11:08] that's most of our problems in autopkgtest-land [11:09] anyway I think blocking is ok [11:09] if we do hit problems, it can always be removed then [11:09] Laney: I'll look at the diff, add a block hint and accept [11:09] nod [11:09] sil2100, thanks! [11:14] ubuntu-archive please take a look at removal requests bug 1872598 and bug 1872593 [11:14] bug 1872598 in ipython-py2 (Ubuntu) "Please remove ipython-py2 from Ubuntu" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1872598 [11:14] bug 1872593 in dh-kpatches (Ubuntu) "Please remove dh-kpatches from Ubuntu" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1872593 [11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: horizon (focal-proposed/main) [3:18.2.1~git2020041013.754804667-0ubuntu1 => 3:18.2.1~git2020041013.754804667-0ubuntu2] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [11:20] sil2100: so about the discourse thing, some of the sections on the release document should move over there I think [11:20] Laney: ah, the discourse thread? [11:21] For release? [11:21] yeah [11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pepperflashplugin-nonfree (focal-proposed/multiverse) [1.8.4ubuntu2 => 1.8.6ubuntu1] (no packageset) [11:21] status summary / current blockers / bugs to watch ? [11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pepperflashplugin-nonfree [source] (focal-proposed) [1.8.6ubuntu1] [11:22] if you agree, I'll do that and add a link once the post is created [11:23] Laney: +1 on that - did you create that thread already? Could you paste the link once you have it? [11:23] see ^ - Wimpres_s and pope_y are on it [11:23] This will be something new for me as I never was a discourse person ;) [11:24] ah, you can have 'wiki posts', so it'll not be too un-familiar for you [11:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted strace [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.5-3ubuntu1] [11:25] jamespage: holy shit 9MB of diff for ceph [11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (focal-proposed/main) [2:16.0.0~b3~git2020041516.5f42488a9a-0ubuntu1 => 2:16.0.0~b3~git2020041516.5f42488a9a-0ubuntu2] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [11:31] jamespage: the changelog in the diff has much more changes than the ones listed on the diff - whyyy is this so late [11:33] eh, let me try that again [11:33] jamespage: the changelog in the diff has much more changes than the ones listed on the bug - whyyy is this so late [11:34] sil2100: sorry which one? [11:34] jbicha: looking at some of those in a moment [11:34] the ceph diff? [11:39] sil2100: do you mean the list in doc/releases/octopus.rst ? I think upstream did a catchup in the docs from the 15.1.0 beta release between 15.2.0 and 15.2.1 [11:40] sil2100: this point release only appeared this week and it takes me a while to validate due to build times [11:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cinnamon (focal-proposed/universe) [4.4.8-3 => 4.4.8-4] (no packageset) (sync) [11:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cinnamon [sync] (focal-proposed) [4.4.8-4] [12:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (focal-proposed) [3:18.2.1~git2020041013.754804667-0ubuntu2] [12:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (focal-proposed) [2:16.0.0~b3~git2020041516.5f42488a9a-0ubuntu2] [12:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ironic [source] (focal-proposed) [1:14.0.1~git2020041013.af9e6ba90-0ubuntu2] [12:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pdfchain (focal-proposed/universe) [1:0.4.4.2-1build1 => 1:0.4.4.2-2] (no packageset) (sync) [12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pdfchain [sync] (focal-proposed) [1:0.4.4.2-2] [12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: balsa (focal-proposed/universe) [2.5.9-4 => 2.6.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) [12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted balsa [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.6.0-2] [12:06] * sil2100 AFK for lunch [12:17] Laney: Re: release wiki post on Discourse. Do you want people to be able to comment? [12:17] Wimpress: ideally not, we don't want to be replying there really [12:19] could someone please take a look at this MP to unblock mysql-8.0? https://code.launchpad.net/~lucaskanashiro/britney/hint-update-mysql-connector-c++/+merge/382246 [12:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-lts (focal-proposed/main) [11.0.7+10-2ubuntu1 => 11.0.7+10-3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync) [12:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-8 (focal-proposed/universe) [8u252-b09-1 => 8u252-b09-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) (sync) [12:34] Laney: Here's your topic - https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/focal-fossa-final-release-status-tracking/15366 [12:34] Release team members have write access to that category. [12:34] When that post has something in it, I will pin it. [12:35] Wimpress: Ta duck [12:42] ooh [12:42] it copies from google docs with proper formatting [12:47] ok filled out with some initial content [12:47] Great. [12:48] sil2100: want to check you can edit that? [12:49] sil2100: I could not find you in Discourse. So let me know your username. [12:50] Laney: Post globally pinned until 23:59 on April 24th. [12:51] 😎 [12:51] Wimpress: popey:: Another idea for that category might be a post with some links giving people info on how to contribute to the release (testing), then I could link to it from the top of this wiki post [12:52] Or maybe in the Quality category and we link to that as a place for testers to gather [12:53] (if you like, just edit the release post and add a short sentence linking people to where you want them to go) [12:57] Knock yourself out :D [12:59] sorry, to remove that doubt, I'm suggesting but not volunteering to write that content I'm afraid :-) === Laney changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: Bionic 18.04.4, Eoan 19.10 | Archive: Final Freeze | Focal release status: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/focal-fossa-final-release-status-tracking/15366 | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Focal Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or gin | melius malum quod cognoscis [13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: stress-ng (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.05.23-1ubuntu3 => 0.05.23-1ubuntu4] (no packageset) [13:21] Laney, there is this post which already links to testing resources and daily builds https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/testing-ubuntu-20-04-lts-official-ubuntu-flavors/14053 [13:26] Laney: hey, did you see my updates to the vulkan ffe? [13:40] Laney: thanks! Let me first try logging in [13:41] Laney, Wimpress: ok, I actually didn't even have an account - I have now created it [13:42] Wimpress: can you try adding me now? [13:54] Wimpress: Should I be able to edit that post directly to update cloud image status? I don't seem to have perms to do so .. or is it pulling the updates from elsewhere? [13:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjdk-8 [sync] (focal-proposed) [8u252-b09-1ubuntu1] [13:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjdk-lts [sync] (focal-proposed) [11.0.7+10-3ubuntu1] [14:12] sil2100, you ok with an update to the oem-5.6 kernel ? [14:13] ...we don't have it on any images now, right? [14:13] sure we do [14:14] apw: i will upload ubiquity in a moment..... so yeah, they will respin. [14:14] Laney: sil2100: vorlon: paride reports that ssh -i /var/lib/jenkins/.ssh/cdimage cdimage@nusakan.canonical.com '/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/bin/mark-current -p ubuntu-server -s focal -t legacy-server -a amd64 20200417' [14:14] fails [14:15] when i run something similar, on my local machine..... it works. [14:15] is there something missing? like clearing out the old 'focal-server-arm64.iso' from current & pending? [14:15] or rather is stray published [14:15] xnox, did you try with "-t legacy-server" ? [14:16] paride: yes. [14:16] xnox: let me run that on nusakan and see how it fails [14:16] Laney: sil2100: vorlon: I think it is bad that "server" builds are listed on http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily/current/ together with "legacy-server" builds. [14:16] paride: but my local deployment has no "server.iso" builds. [14:16] sil2100, https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/m9cqKMmxjK/ [14:16] huh [14:17] sil2100, note that is was passed "-a amd64" but still looks for an arm64 image [14:17] Need to see what current is right now, as I purged the old images from the latest publish directory [14:18] paride, xnox: I think I see the reason [14:19] paride: can you try now? [14:19] xnox, so are you happier if i drop it in now, rather than waiting ? [14:20] sil2100: the tree looks better! [14:20] apw: yeah, but oem kernel respins are cheap. It is only on the /pool => such that we can rebuild desktop iso, without rebuilding livefs. [14:20] xnox: yeah, stupid current was a mixture of different publish sets, and some were actually invalid symlinks because of my earlier purge [14:20] apw: it simply would redownload the old squashfs, and redo debian-cd add packages to the pool. [14:20] apw: ditto e.g. nvidia-* [14:21] xnox, ok then i will dump it in [14:21] sil2100: ful! [14:21] sil2100: fun! [14:21] apw: yeah, throw it at us [14:21] sil2100, if you are in agreement [14:21] apw: you know you're not talking to a release team member for these acks right [14:21] * Laney sees sneaky xnox [14:21] ;) [14:21] Laney, which is why i am deferring to sil2100 :) [14:22] Oh, actually apw is a release team member, so he can ACK himself?! [14:22] sil2100, but one should not really count ones own ack in this context me thinks [14:22] ok good [14:22] sil2100, mark-current -p ubuntu-server -s focal -t legacy-server -a amd64 20200417: success [14:22] what is this new oem kernel for, out of interest? [14:22] thanks! [14:22] Laney, fixes for graphics and the like for supported platforms [14:24] Laney, and we get to make one last choice with britney yet [14:24] Laney: here's the changes file: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/474833166/linux-oem-5.6_5.6.0-1008.8_source.changes [14:25] by our standards tiny [14:25] I'd prefer not having a new release of that, but the GPU fixes sound legit... [14:28] fair enough [14:28] I was expecting it to be revved along with the GA kernel on that cadence but I just assumed that [14:29] guess we're considering that kernel freeze only applies to the default kernel [14:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dbus-c++ (focal-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-8.1build1 => 0.9.0-8.1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntustudio) [14:30] Laney, it is a newer base, so yeah. but we can hold this in -proposed and release it after too [14:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: atk1.0 (focal-proposed/main) [2.35.1-1ubuntu1 => 2.35.1-1ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist) [14:34] nod [14:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dbus-c++ [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.0-8.1ubuntu1] [14:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted websockify [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.0-0ubuntu2] [14:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted atk1.0 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.35.1-1ubuntu2] [14:38] sil2100, Laney: fyi I'm respining the kernel for a couple of install-related issues [14:38] just the primary kernel, no derivatives [14:40] sforshee: ok, eta? [14:40] Laney: I'm test building now, should upload within the hour [14:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1020.21] (core, kernel) [14:42] sforshee: thanks for the heads up o/ [14:42] probably be spinning images later than my normal EOD then! [14:43] remember there's somebody in a different TZ who can help! ;-) [14:43] sil2100, Laney: we usually use a build ppa, would be eaiser this time if I just upload to -proposed instead? [14:43] *would it [14:44] * apw would lean to the PPA as it gives us one more chance to not take it [14:45] sforshee: let's keep the PPA approach [14:45] ack [14:45] We already recommended that for other bigger things [14:45] yeah it doesn't add much delay [14:46] And we can deal with bin-sync in such cases, since we're expecting those and know where to look [14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-1020.21] [14:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: collectd (focal-proposed/universe) [5.9.2.g-1ubuntu4 => 5.9.2.g-1ubuntu5] (no packageset) [14:50] I'm pushing some NBS fixes if anything ^ [14:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted collectd [source] (focal-proposed) [5.9.2.g-1ubuntu5] [14:51] Only few more left \o/ [15:04] new kernel is building, should be done in ~8 hours [15:09] Laney: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/vZX45YS8fB/ [15:09] Laney: so, should i just upload this, or do i need to explain my head bashing aobut this? [15:11] xnox: If you have more explanation, put it in the changelog itself so that future students can study your thoughts [15:15] jibel: Have you looked at these upgrade (automatic testing) failures at all? [15:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: automake-1.15 (focal-proposed/universe) [1:1.15.1-5ubuntu1 => 1:1.15.1-5ubuntu2] (no packageset) [15:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted automake-1.15 [source] (focal-proposed) [1:1.15.1-5ubuntu2] [15:45] cjwatson, stgraber: hey guys, need a quick opinion about something: I want to get rid of the last thing from the NBS report - basically the whole libopencl-clang-dev libopencl-clang9 libllvmspirvlib9 chain - basically both libllvmspirvlib9 and libopencl-clang9 can be safely removed as this is all caused by a dangling old version of libopencl-clang-dev (9.0.0-1build1) [15:46] cjwatson, stgraber: so I'm wondering, why is libopencl-clang-dev both 10.0.0-2 and 9.0.0-1build1 visible still? There is no reverse-dependency explicitly depending on the old version, so I'd assume the binary should be superseeded and no longer visible [15:46] Should I also remove the 10.0.0-2 libopencl-clang-dev binary package manually in this case? [15:46] eh, I mean, remove 9.0.0-1build1 [15:47] Or will everything go fine when I simply remove the chain of libopencl-clang9 and libllvmspirvlib9 ? I guess maybe that's holding it in somehow [15:48] the clang approach for NBS stuff is usually do it an cross fingers :D [15:50] in this case, they are not provided by llvm-defaults, so you should be good to let them go, I'm not even sure why they existed in first place, maybe some sync from experimental [15:51] oh indeed, they are not provided by llvm-* so meh [15:51] libopencl-clang-dev is Architecture: all, so LP conservatively keeps it around as long as any arch-dependent binaries from the same source and version are still active [15:51] cjwatson: oh! [15:51] you shouldn't need to remove it manually [15:52] cjwatson: ok, so it will resolve itself once I remove the other two, thanks! Yeah, this makes total sense [15:52] it'll be automatically superseded by the dominator once the other binaries are gone [15:52] right [15:52] Package: libopencl-clang-dev [15:52] Architecture: amd64 i386 [15:52] not anymore fortunately [15:52] right, it was arch: all at version 9.0.0-1build1 [15:52] yep :) [15:53] also debian tracker is confused by it [15:55] Thanks guys [15:55] Ok, so hopefully when stuff migrates, we'll be able to remove the last NBS binaries and we'll have a clean report [15:57] sil2100: next: focal_uninst.txt :-) [15:59] :( [16:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.663 => 2.664] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) [16:10] Could I get a review of livecd-rootfs in the queue? [16:28] Wimpress: hey! Can you give me the powers now to edit that post? ;) [16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664] [16:31] jamespage: ok, looking at ceph now again [16:32] jamespage: so as said the diff is huge, 9MB, and I guess I see a lot of huge directories being added - just wanted to make sure that's correct [16:32] xnox: you going to upload that soon? [16:32] please close bug #1873434 when you do [16:32] bug 1873434 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Focal) "default kernel left installed on systems which use oem kernel" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1873434 [16:33] Laney: yes. [16:33] jamespage: there's like src/rocksdb added and src/civetweb and those seem to have like super a lot of source files [16:33] merci merci [16:33] sil2100: reviewing now [16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.13 => 20.04.14] (core) [16:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (focal-proposed/main) [1.448 => 1.449] (core) [16:35] paride: did things work, or not? [16:36] paride: sil2100: should sil2100 mark all latests builds as current himself? cause then he will see what's broken [16:37] sil2100: can you please ./bin/mark-current for -t legacy-server for 20200417 for all 4 arches? [16:37] Laney: ubiquity uploaded [16:38] xnox: R O C K O N [16:38] yes xnox it works now, but for the other archs the jobs still have to run. UTAH needs to be rebuilt [16:38] but the promotion worked [16:39] paride: ah cool! [16:39] sil2100: unping [16:40] ;) [16:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-calendar [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.1-0build1] [16:47] sil2100: leave it with me - I had a load of exclusions in d/copyright that have somehow got dropped between 15.2.0 and 15.2.1 [16:47] hence the stupid diff [16:51] xnox: no idea how having "${OEM_KERNEL}" there causes the default kernel to remain installed [16:51] voodoo [16:52] sil2100: would you like to reject that version and I'll have another run at it... [16:54] jamespage: ok o/ [16:55] jamespage: rejected, give me a poke when you re-upload o/ [16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ceph [source] (focal-proposed) [15.2.1-0ubuntu1] [16:58] me listens to xz running his fans hard [16:59] Shouldn't we just stop listing Eoan as active on the isotracker? [17:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-launchpadlib (focal-proposed/main) [1.10.11-1 => 1.10.12-1] (core) (sync) [17:13] ^- should fix autopkgtests [17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxc [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.0.2-0ubuntu1] [17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.14] [17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-launchpadlib [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.10.12-1] [17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [1.449] [17:24] bdmurray: ok I updated the discourse with the packages that I think we should wait for before spinning [17:24] going now [17:24] Laney: ack, thanks! [17:26] bdmurray: Laney: Wimpress: Can CPC team have edit access to the post too so we can update cloud image build progress? myself and rcj if possible. [17:34] Laney: o/ [17:37] philroche: can't help with that, sorry [17:37] bdmurray: sil2100: btw there's an autopkgtest backlog and quite a few things waiting in proposed [17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virt-manager (focal-proposed/universe) [1:2.2.1-3ubuntu1 => 1:2.2.1-3ubuntu2] (no packageset) [17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virt-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1:2.2.1-3ubuntu2] [17:41] we're probably going to want to make a call on remaining things on monday, and I guess punt some of them to SRUs [17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.6-dfsg-1 => 6.1.6-dfsg-2] (ubuntu-cloud) (sync) [17:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.6.0-1008.8] (no packageset) [18:03] Laney: yeah [18:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spirv-headers (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5.1-4 => 1.5.1+git20200409-1] (i386-whitelist) (sync) [18:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spirv-tools (focal-proposed/universe) [2020.1-2 => 2020.2-1] (i386-whitelist) (sync) [18:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vulkan-loader (focal-proposed/main) [1.2.131.2-1 => 1.2.135.0-2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) (sync) [18:31] synced these ^ back for the ffe [19:10] sil2100: OK re-uploading - I think I've got it right now... [19:10] (ceph that is) [19:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (focal-proposed/main) [15.2.0-0ubuntu2 => 15.2.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [19:16] Bah, http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/p/python-launchpadlib/focal/amd64 still failing. Not sure I'll manage to cram this into focal now :-/ [19:16] ddstreet: ^- FYI [20:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxd (focal-proposed/universe) [1:0.8 => 1:0.9] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server) [20:04] ^ this is a tiny change but apparently quite critical for LTS to LTS upgrade on WSL [20:04] (the lxd deb isn't seeded, this is used during upgrades only to switch over to the snap) [20:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxcfs (focal-proposed/universe) [4.0.2-0ubuntu1 => 4.0.3-0ubuntu1] (edubuntu) [20:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxcfs [source] (focal-proposed) [4.0.3-0ubuntu1] [20:47] ^lxd We discovered in testing under some circumstances a user who upgraded from 16.04 to 18.04 and then upgrades to 20.04 on WSL would have their upgrade stall and could leave them with a broken system. This patch better handles that scenario. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntuwsl/+bug/1862550 [20:47] Ubuntu bug 1862550 in Ubuntu WSL "Upgrading to 20.04 Attempts to Install LXD via Snap Store" [Critical,Fix committed] [21:01] vorlon, could you please merge https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/382530 for glibc? the rest seems just flakiness [21:11] matlock: ok.... do you have a question? [21:11] matlock: did you want to open a bugtask against "lxd" package in Ubuntu project for the focal series? [21:15] rbalint: done [21:17] matlock: nevermind, i see the request from stgraber now. [22:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.7 => 1:20.04.9] (core) [22:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: gnome-shell-extension-dashtodock (focal-proposed/primary) [67+git20200225-1] [22:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-workspaces-to-dock (focal-proposed/universe) [52-1 => 52+git20200318-1] (no packageset) (sync) [22:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-workspaces-to-dock [sync] (focal-proposed) [52+git20200318-1] [22:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.9] [22:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor (focal-proposed/universe) [38-2 => 38+git20200414-32cc79e-1] (no packageset) (sync) [22:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor [sync] (focal-proposed) [38+git20200414-32cc79e-1] [23:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: valentina (focal-proposed/universe) [0.6.1~dfsg-9build1 => 0.6.1~dfsg-10] (no packageset) (sync) [23:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted valentina [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.6.1~dfsg-10] [23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ceph [source] (focal-proposed) [15.2.1-0ubuntu1]