 Waht was the package that allowed Ubuntu's logo to show up at boot alongside the OEM?
 plymouth?
 what a beautiful site:
 Going good.  Been using home assistance in a docker container on it.
 Working good.
 Only issues is on reboot it keeps setting the date to the day I installed it.
 So I have to do a ntpdate sync towards my pfSense to get the time.  Then it works. (re @philipz: how is it going running on a RPi)
[03:01] <lotuspsychje> good morning
 It was 10:01pm for me when you sent that.... (re @ubuntutesting_bot: [irc] <lotuspsychje> good morning)
 morning here :D
 is anyone else noticing this bug with the close button:
 i'm running the cawbird snap
 I also experience this with the Firefox Snap. (re @philipz: )
 Incidentally, I don't experience it with all of them, just some of them.
 Never heard of cawbird.
 Looks cool. (re @philipz: i'm running the cawbird snap)
[08:37] <lotuspsychje> morning @troyBORG and @philipz
[09:10] <shaban238> im still getting this blank screen even though in the power manager i selected everything correctly. so after computer is idle i got a black screen and it should not
 Should the issue of ubuntu-server preinstalled server image report here?
[09:40] <shaban238> https://streamable.com/1f9k7w
[09:55] <shaban238> this are my settings: https://postimg.cc/Mcjh1Bfx
 did you file a bug for it? (re @schykle: Incidentally, I don't experience it with all of them, just some of them.)
 fork of elementary OS's abandoned twitter client called corebird (re @troyBORG: Never heard of cawbird.
 Looks cool.)
 shaban238: i'd report that upsteram with xfce https://bugzilla.xfce.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Xfce4-power-manager&component=General&resolution=---
 paste the link here when you do. attach your settings file in the bug report
[10:16] <shaban238> ok thank you
[10:47] <shaban238> https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16712
 shaban238: can you attach the actual file and not the screenshot of it
[11:13] <shaban238> ok i will do that
[11:19] <shaban238> did it!
 thanks
 moving day is upon me
 Morning/afternoon everyone
 afternoon @ItzSwirlz
 Looks like there has been no daily builds for today, so keeps your eyes peeled for Focal Final testcases
 http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/412/builds
 Meanwhile i'll go work on website
 Here's a sneaky peeky:
 did you also get the .com?
[14:36] <Ussat> Anyone here able to maby point out something that makes zero sence to me:  https://pastebin.com/j5i78zT7 this is a fresh install of a iso from yesterday, but I installed it on a 50GB disk, in vmware. I chose use entire disk and put in a LVM
[14:37] <RikMills> can someone hint software-properties past the crash/7.2.8-1ubuntu1 test failures, or retry the tests if it is likely to now find the missing ddebs?
[14:37] <RikMills> damn. typed in wrong chat^ sorry
 XD
 All good @RikMills
[14:39] <RikMills> ubuntu-quality and ubuntu-release IRC channels are right next to each other on my client :P
 Don't forget -release-party I'm sure that has never been done by anyone either. :D
[14:45] <RikMills> I don't join there until a release is imminent!
 we have .org-i'm not sure if .com will be important but we will see (re @philipz: did you also get the .com?)
 better to have both, to keep squaters away
 yeah i read it (re @philipz: better to have both, to keep squaters away)
 dont worry, dming the person who owns the domain
 do i have to worry about a .net squatter?
 or will .com be enough
 I would worry about .* squatter. You probably want all the things just to be safe.
 .com and .org minimum should be fine
 Yeah, focus on the mainstream stuff first.
 .com is most important
 strange, as godaddy says the .com is available
 you sure? (re @ItzSwirlz: dont worry, dming the person who owns the domain)
 ? yeah (re @philipz: you sure?)
 if we can try to get it minus well
 asking if you are sure its already registered, as godaddy has it as available
[18:50] <shaban238> Eickmeyer can i please ask you smth?
 i'll try to help shaban238 if i can
[18:53] <shaban238> thank you :)
[18:54] <shaban238> there is an option in realtimequickscan to add the soundcard to be checked also. in the help file it says that you need to find the IRQ in proc/interupts and than do export SOUND_CARD_IRQ={IRQ #} in the same terminal window. i did that and im getting Checking for devices at IRQ {IRQ #32}... did not find any. not ok.
 oh that's above my knowledge. sorry.
[18:55] <shaban238> no worries
 @RikMills, @kc2bez: you guys have any input for our tester
 not a clue :P
 Sorry, I don't know either.
 a heads up to all the flavors, i'll be putting out a call for testers tomorrow, to give one last push for testing before the release.
[18:59] <shaban238> :)
 are all the isos for final being uploaded at the same time
[20:10] <Eickmeyer> shaban238: So, that's a support question, and this isn't exactly a support chat. I'm pretty confident OvenWerks in #ubuntustudio would know what to do there, I have no clue. For some reason, all of my hardware Just Works™.
[20:10] <shaban238> ok thnks anyway
[20:12] <Eickmeyer> shaban238: Also, realtimeconfigquickscan isn't the be-all/end-all, it's just a few "pointers" to get you to a more-optimized configuration, but it is 100% dependent on the hardware, OS, and tools available. Sometimes it returns false positives, too.
[20:13] <Eickmeyer> Kinda like the audio engineering mantra: Mix with your ears, not with your eyes. :)
[20:13] <shaban238> yes i remember you told me that. i managed to have all good btw and im not getting any xruns so its good to go :D
[20:13] <Eickmeyer> Sweet. :(
[20:13] <Eickmeyer> s/:(/:)
[22:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Netboot amd64 [Focal Final] (20101020ubuntu613) has been added
[22:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Netboot armhf [Focal Final] (20101020ubuntu613) has been added
[22:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Netboot s390x [Focal Final] (20101020ubuntu613) has been added
[22:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Netboot arm64 [Focal Final] (20101020ubuntu613) has been added
[22:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Netboot ppc64el [Focal Final] (20101020ubuntu613) has been added
 We got netboot!

[22:45] <Eickmeyer> RCs are slowly pouring in.
 currently testing netboot amd64 in vm
 iso is still wrong but I went to the mirror, grabbed latest (apr 16)
 the latest update was apr 18 tho, but i can't figure out how to update it
[23:27] <Eickmeyer> @ItzSwirlz: The netboot's date will always be wrong. It has something to do with when the first netboot was created, and that it is manually built as opposed to built daily.
 checking out @bashfulrobot on DLN - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HB2BazvTDk4
 Is it a bug when after using netboot to install ubuntu desktop (all, first two options not minimal), the wallpaper isn't set
 the warty-final-ubuntu.png hasn't been placed
 file as a bug?
[23:53] <Eickmeyer> @ItzSwirlz Does the file exist at all in the install?
 ill check-i saw when looking at the backgrounds i saw the focal image
[23:54] <Eickmeyer> Ok. the warty-final-ubuntu.png should be a symlink to whatever the name of the default wallpaper is.
[23:55] <Eickmeyer> If it's not there, then there might be a bug in ubuntu-settings.
[23:57] <Eickmeyer> actually, the bug would be in ubuntu-wallpapers.
 It’s there
[23:57] <Eickmeyer> Is it symlinking then?
 No, the dconf is correct
 But the wallpaper isn’t changing
 Actually
 It’s not even able to change
 Or be enabled