/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/04/20/#ubuntu-release.txt

xnoxapw: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845801 how come nvidia-drm.modeset=1 not the default? Also I think my laptop hangs on boot too, as described in the bug.00:28
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1845801 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 (Ubuntu Eoan) "[nvidia] Automatic login fails and then all subsequent logins fail. Killing gnome-session-binary fixes it, or just not using automatic login." [Low,Confirmed]00:28
xnoxFor me gdm hangs / never comes up.00:28
xnoxAlso, failing to boot any arm64 images off usb.00:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sugar-artwork (focal-proposed/universe) [0.116-1 => 0.117-1] (no packageset) (sync)00:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sugar-artwork [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.117-1]00:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sugar-toolkit-gtk3 (focal-proposed/universe) [0.116-6 => 0.117-1] (no packageset) (sync)00:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sugar-toolkit-gtk3 [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.117-1]00:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: subtitleeditor (focal-proposed/universe) [0.54.0-3build1 => 0.54.0-4] (ubuntustudio) (sync)00:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: simde (focal-proposed/primary) [0.0.0.git.20200415-1]00:39
RAOFxnox: Hm. For me, *setting* `nvidia-drm.modeset=1` resulted in all manner of broken behaviour (that was a hybrid system). This might be a hybrid/not-hybrid problem?00:54
xnoxRao00:56
xnoxRAOF: with or without splash? And on Focal, right?00:56
RAOFWith splash, on focal.00:57
RAOFBut earlier in the cycle, and my hybrid laptop decided to die.00:58
RAOFMy bug was that starting X as non-root would silently fall *unless* there was an existing instance of X started as root already running.01:00
RAOFHm, now that I think if it maybe that *wasn't* focal. My laptop died earlier than that. Must have been eoan.01:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ruby2.7 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.7.0-5ubuntu1]02:11
handsome_fengHi, Does wallpaper changes need UIFe (Not the default wallpapers) ?03:31
handsome_fengIf add a new wallpaper need UIFe , can I just drop a wallpaper which have license problem?03:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby2.7 (focal-proposed/main) [2.7.0-4ubuntu1 => 2.7.0-5ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)05:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yubioath-desktop (focal-proposed/universe) [5.0.2-3 => 5.0.3-1] (no packageset) (sync)05:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yubioath-desktop [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.0.3-1]05:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntukylin-wallpapers (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04.1 => 20.04.2] (ubuntukylin)07:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby2.7 (focal-proposed/main) [2.7.0-4ubuntu1 => 2.7.0-5ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)07:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: boinc (focal-proposed/universe) [7.16.6+dfsg-1 => 7.16.6+dfsg-1] (no packageset) (sync)07:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sass-spec (focal-proposed/universe) [3.6.3-1.1 => 3.6.3-1.1] (no packageset) (sync)07:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted boinc [sync] (focal-proposed) [7.16.6+dfsg-1]07:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby2.7 (focal-proposed/main) [2.7.0-4ubuntu1 => 2.7.0-5ubuntu1ppa1] (i386-whitelist)07:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sass-spec [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.6.3-1.1]07:29
LocutusOfBorgof course the ruby2.7 ubuntu1ppa1 was meant to my ppa, not sure why dput allows me to upload on ubuntu :/ /me grabs coffee07:31
wgrantLocutusOfBorg: Morning. I actually already uploaded symbol fixes based on your failed build, now waiting in the queue. Built fine everywhere in https://launchpad.net/~wgrant/+archive/ubuntu/nonvirt/+sourcepub/11195715/+listing-archive-extra07:32
LocutusOfBorgnice!07:40
wgrantLocutusOfBorg: Mind if I reject your two?07:40
wgrantOr at least the ppa1 one :)07:40
LocutusOfBorgsure!07:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ruby2.7 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.7.0-5ubuntu1ppa1]07:42
sil2100Wimpress: hello! Can you give me the powers to update that discourse thread? ;)07:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ruby2.7 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.7.0-5ubuntu1]07:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ruby2.7 [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.7.0-5]07:44
philrocheWimpress: Me too please07:45
sil2100apw: hey! We seem to have a few NBSes related to kernels right now07:45
mwhudsonLocutusOfBorg: i have a dput wrapper that stops me doing things like that07:47
mwhudsonLocutusOfBorg: https://github.com/mwhudson/dput-wrap07:48
philrocheMorning all. I am testing hyperv desktop image builds in prep for release and build is failing due to `gamemode:amd64 Depends on libinih1:amd64 < none @un H > (>= 48) can't be satisfied!` I cannot replicate this issue locally on focal install. Is anyone aware of dependency issues with 'gamemode' package?07:49
sil2100tjaalton: hey! I see the new linux-oem-5.6 kernel is still blocked in -proposed, any ETA for getting it into release?07:49
sil2100philroche: hm, not that I am aware of, no07:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireshark (focal-proposed/universe) [3.2.2-1 => 3.2.3-1] (no packageset) (sync)07:51
philrochesil2100: ack. I'll keep digging07:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireshark [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.2.3-1]07:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntukylin-wallpapers [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.2]07:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.policy [source] (focal-proposed) [3.1.0-0ubuntu1]07:55
tjaaltonsil2100: well, I wonder if it could be a post-release update, sort of like being a part of the current sru cycle while in reality it's a devel series kernel.. but I can also check if it could be released soon and included in the image08:02
tjaaltondkms tests failing because it's 5.6, it seems08:03
tjaaltonthought I marked them failing for good, but apparently not08:03
apwsil2100, ack08:07
xnoxphilroche:  are you building "main-only" or "with-universe enabled"? I see that gamemode is currently in main, but not seed, and thus wants to be demoted. And libinih1 is only available in universe. Also gamemode is up for demotion at https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.html08:14
xnoxphilroche:  should gamemode be in main, if it's seeded in the hyperv image? then we need to added to either like desktop-supported or cloud-supported?08:15
sil2100tjaalton: ok, let's leave it in -proposed then08:16
seb128xnox, gamemode was added to desktop-minimal on friday08:16
seb128xnox, philroche, I will fix it, I overlooked that libinih was in universe when I did the gamemode update that enabled it as a depends08:17
xnoxseb128:  sure. but i'm trying to understand why components-missmatches wants to demote it. as if the seed change is stuck somewhere08:18
sil2100Ok everyone, we're currently waiting for some staged packages to migrate out of -proposed (like glibc etc.)  and then we'll be spinning our first release candidates08:27
cjwatsonddebs.u.c has caught up08:28
LocutusOfBorgmwhudson, thanks, why not integrate on dput upstream?08:31
mwhudsonLocutusOfBorg: too lazy!08:32
LocutusOfBorgconverting into a dput profile!08:32
mwhudsonLocutusOfBorg: is that a dput-ng thing?08:32
mwhudsonsil2100: eta on that?08:33
* mwhudson wonders about a quick subiquity snap build and promote08:33
sil2100mwhudson: anything critical in that?08:34
sil2100Some saucy fixes?08:34
mwhudsonsil2100: some autoinstall bugfixes08:34
LocutusOfBorgprobably yes mwhudson08:35
Laneyvorlon: I'll let the team know08:36
sil2100mwhudson: it's all tested, right? Guess build+promote is quite fast, to what I would say: yes08:36
mwhudsonsil2100: tested, let's say that i'm confident that it's better than what's in stable/ubuntu-20.04 right now08:36
LocutusOfBorgmwhudson, probably "hooks" or similar08:39
LocutusOfBorgmeh, who remembers?08:39
sil2100Since though glibc just migrated, there's the kylin wallpaper package that I think I'd still like to have that in the release08:39
sil2100mwhudson: go for it!08:39
mwhudsonLocutusOfBorg: i certainly never figured it out, which is why it's a perl wrapper still!08:39
xnoxseb128:  running germinate locally results in: ? Unknown desktop-minimal package: gamemode08:39
xnoxseb128:  no idea, why08:40
mwhudsonsil2100: turns out the automatic import github -> lp ran at exactly the right time so the snap was already building08:40
philrochexnox universe appears to be enabled08:40
philrocheseb128: Thank you08:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lubuntu-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.7]08:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxd [source] (focal-proposed) [1:0.9]08:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (focal-proposed/main) [159 => 160] (ubuntu-desktop)08:46
seb128handsome_feng, ^08:47
Laneyargh08:48
seb128the upload fixes bug #187354308:48
ubot5bug 1873543 in ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (Ubuntu) "The version 159 revert the translations of ubuntukylin" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187354308:48
WimpressMorning all o/08:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice-dictionaries [sync] (focal-proposed) [1:6.4.3-1]08:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu [source] (focal-proposed) [160]08:51
xnoxseb128:  ok, updated my mirror, and now germinate is happy with everything. still no idea about components-missmatches08:52
handsome_fengseb128: Thanks!08:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected spirv-headers [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.5.1+git20200409-1]09:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected vulkan-loader [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.2.135.0-2]09:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected spirv-tools [sync] (focal-proposed) [2020.2-1]09:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-launchpadlib [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.10.13-1]09:12
mwhudsonsil2100: subiquity published to the appropriate places09:15
sil2100mwhudson: \o/09:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gamemode (focal-proposed/main) [1.5.1-0ubuntu2 => 1.5.1-0ubuntu3] (no packageset)09:28
seb128^ that fixes the gamemode issue trying to pull a lib from universe than philroche reported a bit earlier than is breaking hyperv images (and probably problematic for Ubuntu builds as well)09:30
seb128the diff is non trivial but it's basically reverted the recent .1 upload changes and going back to the codebase that was reviewing during the MIR09:31
philrocheseb128: Thanks. I'll verify once it's accepted09:32
xnoxdoko:  bzr branch lp:ubuntu-archive-scripts: ./auto-accept debug => should say why things are not getting auto-accepted.09:33
xnoxdoko:  but also i guess comment out queue accept call at the end of it, just in case it uses your AA powers.09:33
sil2100seb128: hey! Could you upload it with the patch having a description of what's going on? Since we'll just be confused if we look at it in the future09:33
seb128sil2100, I could, I do plan to revert than change in g* when it opens, we just need to MIR libinih09:34
seb128it feels late to do that now in focal though09:34
cjwatson"./auto-accept debug"> kinda needs actual option parsing09:34
cjwatsonCould easily enough be ./auto-accept --debug --dry-run09:34
xnoxLaney:  cjwatson: yeah, we can't figure out why gcc-snapshot was not auto-accepted, we thought that it should be, despite being in the "i386" seed.09:35
xnoxor is auto-accept off at this point?09:35
Laneyno it's not09:35
sil2100seb128: ok, if you could upload then we'd accept that one, I'll reject the one without a patch comment09:36
alexafHello people. I intend to create a local mirror of Ubuntu Focal after it's officially released. Is there a way to get an estimate of the needed disk space? Thanks09:36
seb128sil2100, ok, that's for you paperwork lovers :)09:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gamemode (focal-proposed/main) [1.5.1-0ubuntu2 => 1.5.1-0ubuntu3] (no packageset)09:37
seb128sil2100, ^ enjoy09:38
sil2100seb128: thank you!09:39
seb128sil2100, yw!09:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gamemode [source] (focal-proposed) [1.5.1-0ubuntu3]09:40
sil2100seb128: oh, one more thing, should we still build dep on libinih* there?09:57
seb128sil2100, I'm unsure, I went for minimal risk and just revert to what we had in Debian/the archive for cycles09:58
dokoapw, sforshee, wgrant: can linux-riscv64 be demoted, or should it be seeded?09:58
sil2100seb128: hm, ok09:58
sil2100Makes sense09:58
seb128sil2100, it's probably not needed no but I didn't want to start doing cleanups and risk introducing another problem because I overlooked something09:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gamemode [source] (focal-proposed) [1.5.1-0ubuntu3]10:00
seb128opinion on syncing glib-networking from https://packages.qa.debian.org/g/glib-networking/news/20200417T084838Z.html ?10:03
Laneyseb128: file an SRU bug, include the bug reference10:04
seb128it feels a bit late but it has basically one commit which is ' Reenable TLS 1.0/1.1 due to COVID-19 '10:04
seb128Laney, do you want to maybe consider it for release? if not I just put that lower on my todo, SRUs can wait10:04
LaneyI mean maybe, if it's in the queue we can decide later10:05
seb128k, I will deal with some other things before and see if I find the motiviation to do the SRU paperowrk after lunch :)10:06
dokobinutils-riscv64-linux-gnu still wants to demote, component-mismatches still doesn't include riscv6410:06
xnoxseb128:  we re-enabled it in Firefox, Chrome, Chromium, so humans can access covid websites. Are there any human visible browsers that use glib-networking?10:08
xnoxdoko:  i think linux-riscv64 should be seeded10:09
seb128xnox, yes, the GNOME one (epiphany-browser)10:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glib-networking (focal-proposed/main) [2.64.1-1 => 2.64.2-1build1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)10:19
seb128^ k, in between option, uploaded with a bug reference but the bug isn't SRU compliant yet but that way it can be made later if needed10:20
seb128(also I uploaded the wrong one first so rejected/uploaded again)10:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected glib-networking [source] (focal-proposed) [2.64.2-1build1]10:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glib-networking (focal-proposed/main) [2.64.1-1 => 2.64.2-1build1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)10:21
xnoxdoko:  updated seeded kernel packages with audio review from apw https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/platform/commit/?id=c0e59184d807f50ec6f89d3800758691fda1b60110:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected qemu [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.2-3ubuntu6]10:31
xnoxdoko:  gcc-snapshot lack of auto-accept fix is in https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/ubuntu-archive-scripts/auto-accept-i386-only-packages/+merge/38256910:34
sil2100Ok everyone! The britney -proposed freeze block is now ON10:35
xnoxboom10:35
dokoxnox: add community-maas there as well?10:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (focal-proposed/main) [1:4.2-3ubuntu5 => 1:4.2-3ubuntu6] (ubuntu-server, virt)10:36
xnoxdoko:  probably10:36
xnoxdoko:  still need to fix community-missmatches for community stuff10:36
philrocheseb128: xnox: Thank you both. Desktop hyperv images now successfully build.10:47
seb128philroche, great!10:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted faudio [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04-2]11:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (focal-proposed) [6.0.0-0ubuntu8]11:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virglrenderer [source] (focal-proposed) [0.8.2-1ubuntu1]11:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.2-3ubuntu6]11:08
xnoxdoko:  https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/ubuntu-archive-tools/riscv64/+merge/382573 fixing up adding riscv64 to components-missmatches11:08
Laneyhttps://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/ubuntu-archive-scripts/trunk/revision/27911:12
Laneyshould fix mysterious non-auto-accepts that somebody was complaining about earlier11:13
Laneyseb128: gamemode is still in universe, could you promote it please?11:14
Laneystgraber: could you add paride (~legovini) to ubuntu-qa-website-devel maybe?11:56
Laneywe just noticed he's missing some permissions and this seems like the simplest way to grant them11:57
Laneyhuh, component-mismatches is from thursday12:01
Laneyxnox: is that something to do with you12:02
xnoxLaney:  thanks, so instead of revieing a branch from me https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/ubuntu-archive-scripts/auto-accept-i386-only-packages/+merge/382569 you two create your own and merge that12:05
seb128Laney, I promoted it on friday, looking at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gamemode/+publishinghistory it looks like doko demoted it a bit earlier, unsure why?12:05
xnoxLaney:  please reject mine one, i guess12:05
Laneydidn't see it, sorry12:05
xnoxseb128:  it is in components-missmatches report.12:05
Laneysee my previous comment ab out component-mismatches12:05
xnoxdoko:  please stop demoting things. something is odd with components-missmatches12:05
Laneyand I can't reject it, no permissions12:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sylpheed (focal-proposed/universe) [3.5.1-1ubuntu5 => 3.7.0-6ubuntu1] (no packageset)12:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sylpheed [source] (focal-proposed) [3.7.0-6ubuntu1]12:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: gcc-8-cross (focal-release/primary) [33ubuntu2]12:09
seb128Laney, k, promoted again12:09
seb128hopefully that doesn't trigger that bug when promoting again makes things vanish (I don't remember the specifics)12:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: gcc-8-cross-ports (focal-release/primary) [27ubuntu2]12:10
Laneydon't think that happens any more anyway12:11
Laneyok cowboyed a fix for component-mismatche12:12
Laneys12:12
dokoI went over component mismatches this morning. I only saw gamesmode on the list of demotions12:15
stgraberLaney: done12:16
Laneymaybe someone in ubuntu-archive could review https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/ubuntu-archive-tools/riscv64/+merge/382573 so I can uncowboy it12:16
Laneystgraber: cheers!12:16
Laneyseb128: and thanks for the promotion12:16
kanashirolocutus__: thanks for the heads-up about ruby2.7, I didn't notice it failed in riscv64 for instance. However, the changes you proposed FTBFS in armhf due to symbols changes: https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+sourcepub/11195317/+listing-archive-extra12:16
seb128Laney, np!12:16
wgrantkanashiro: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/475372268/ruby2.7_2.7.0-4ubuntu1_2.7.0-5ubuntu1.diff.gz (from the focal-proposed queue) fixes the build on 32-bit architectures.12:18
paridestgraber, thanks!12:18
kanashirowgrant: great, I'll apply those changes in Debian. Thanks!12:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ddtp-translations (focal-proposed/universe) [20200416.1 => 20200420.1] (no packageset)12:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ddtp-translations [source] (focal-proposed) [20200420.1]12:27
sil2100vorlon: hey! Was looking at the twisted and pyhamcrest uploads - I see some of the dropped python-twisted- packages have some reverse dependencies that might need dealing with, one is python-cyclone (which I think would be good for removal) but the other is python-tx-tftp, which is a stale main package13:06
sil2100(wonder why it's in main, it's not seeded anywhere it seems)13:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-8-cross-ports [sync] (focal-release) [27ubuntu2]13:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-8-cross [sync] (focal-release) [33ubuntu2]13:07
=== s8321414_ is now known as s8321414
dokomwhudson: golang-1.14: subscribed foundations and promoted13:21
dokocpaelzer, jamespage: nova-spiceproxy is pulled in from supported-misc-servers. ok to promote?13:24
dokothe binary13:24
dokoseb128, Laney: yelp now recommends docbook-xml (universe)13:27
seb128doko, feel free to promote docbook-xml, it was in main in xenial and desktop-packages is already subscribed13:29
dokoseb128: done, including sgml-data13:31
seb128doko, thanks13:31
Laneymerci13:31
dokojamespage, coreycb: spice-html5 recommends the websockify binary. ok to promote, or do you want to lower that to a suggests?13:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (focal-proposed/main) [67ubuntu20.04.4 => 67ubuntu20.04.5] (ubuntu-desktop)13:42
cpaelzerdoko: I thought that was promoted in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/websockify/+bug/1108935/comments/2813:42
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1108935 in websockify (Ubuntu) "[MIR] websockify, spice-html5" [High,Fix released]13:42
cpaelzerdoko: did it get auto-demoted since then?13:42
dokoI only see it now on c-m13:44
cpaelzerfor  nova-spiceprox I guess the answer is yes, but would want jamespage to answer13:44
sforsheesil2100, Laney: we have a networking driver bug that we're trying to confirm a fix for (bug 1871182). I don't know that this is hard respin material, but would be good to include if there's an opportunity13:46
ubot5bug 1871182 in initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) "[RTL810xE] No ethernet connection" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187118213:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (eoan-proposed/main) [242-7ubuntu3.7 => 242-7ubuntu3.8] (core)13:47
sil2100sforshee: thanks for the heads up, the fix would be in the kernel then? What is the usual turn-around for a kernel respin?13:48
sil2100sforshee: would that be only for the linux kernel or also for linux-oem-5.6 ?13:49
sforsheesil2100: yes in the kernel. The build is 8-10 hours, depending on how long armhf takes. oem-5.6 should already be fixed, as the report says 5.5 tests ok13:50
LaneyI guess it would be good to kick off builds in parallel with verifying the fix13:50
sforsheeyeah, we can do that13:51
Laney👍13:51
sil2100popey: hello! Could you give me the power to edit that focal-release-status discourse post? :)13:54
popeydo you have an account now? I couldn't find you previously13:54
popeynvm, found you13:55
popeydone13:55
sil2100popey: thanks! Yeah, I didn't have an account apaprently last time13:55
philrochepopey: Me too please - for cloud image updates. Discourse username philroche13:56
popeyyou already should have13:56
popeyi added you 3 days ago13:56
philrochepopey: I see no option to edit though13:57
sil2100popey: hm, I think I still not see teh edit button13:57
popeyit's at the bottom, next to 3 little dots13:58
popeyhttps://imgur.com/a/1Dg3wfg13:58
sil2100popey: weird! Don't have that, hm13:59
popeyone moment13:59
philrocheNor me https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/XOSBQ6eR/image.png13:59
sil2100popey: Brian even screen shared and I don't seem to have that edit thingy nor the pencil on top13:59
popeyah, new accounts, you're untrusted newbs :D13:59
popeysil2100 try now, refresh the page14:00
popeyphilroche same, try now (although probably not at the same time ;D)14:00
sil2100Ah ha!14:00
sil2100I have it now!14:00
popeyhuzzah14:00
sil2100popey: thanks ;)14:00
popeyfeel free to let me know if any extra rls people need access14:01
philrocheBingo. Me too. Thanks popey14:01
popeyGreat Success.14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chrony (focal-proposed/main) [3.5-6ubuntu5 => 3.5-6ubuntu6] (core)14:02
seb128sil2100, Laney, others: can we get the gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock upload be considered for release? it's a pretty annoying issue which has different side effect on the shell, I'm a bit worried it creates other issue than the one referenced and I would prefer to see the fix in the release if possible14:03
popeyThe vertical monitor issue with tiny icons? Yes. super annoying :)14:04
seb128popey, dunno about the tiny icon, but vertical monitor which leads the overview to be like 1/8th of the screen14:04
popeyhttps://imgur.com/a/AoQKfFa this14:05
seb128popey, https://launchpadlibrarian.net/473594511/Screenshot_20200408_130437-search-bar-half-visible.png is how I saw it when testing14:05
popeyyes, same14:05
seb128by "tiny" you mean 'cut"?14:06
popeyno, press super, don't search for app, press "All", press super again14:06
seb128(just making sure we are talking about the same thing, maybe there is also a problem where icons have the wrong size)14:06
popeyyou'll see no icons until the animation happens14:06
seb128k14:06
popeywell, there's two bugs here, I suspect they're rleated14:06
cpaelzerhi release team, can I ask to accept chrony in focal-unapproved please14:06
seb128anyway, we agree having the fix would be good :)14:07
cpaelzerno need to stall the ISO build by it, but it would be great to get it into -proposed for another potential respin to pick it up14:07
cpaelzersil2100: are you the queue-master right now or can you point me to who I should ping?14:07
cpaelzerI have already added a full SRU template to the bug just in case14:07
cpaelzerrbalint: thanks for finding and filing BTW14:08
sil2100cpaelzer: looking14:11
popeysil2100 this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mZZtClVOSg14:11
* popey tries to find the bug 14:12
sil2100Wow, those are really tiny icons14:12
sil2100vorlon: ok, so I had a quick chat with sparkiegeek about the python-txtftp thingy - it's still used, but only the python3 versions, although apparently dropping python-txtftp is non-trivial14:14
sil2100vorlon: (the python2 version of it)14:14
philrochesil2100: popey: Wimpress: Do any of you know hoe to get edit access on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FocalFossa/ReleaseNotes ? - currently marked as "Immutable Page"14:14
bdmurrayphilroche: That's something with your account as I can edit it14:15
popeyphilroche logout / login / refresh/ sacrifice a chicken in a pentagram14:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (bionic-proposed/main) [237-3ubuntu10.39 => 237-3ubuntu10.40] (core)14:15
cpaelzerpopey: your icons seem a bit like the fix to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1869571 overshoot14:15
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1869571 in OEM Priority Project "Vertical dual monitor setup with main monitor on bottom causes overview to only use one eighth of screen" [High,New]14:15
* philroche goes to find a chicken14:16
cpaelzerformerly only half visible, now all fitting but very very small14:16
popeycpaelzer yes, this was the bug we would like fixed14:16
sil2100vorlon: so basically if we accept your twisted upload, this would potentially make python-tx-tftp unbuildable (and the python-txtftp binary uninstallable)14:16
Laneymaybe move talk of desktop bugs to #ubuntu-desktop14:16
Laneyseb128: will look14:17
sil2100vorlon: which sadly feels like not the right way to go right now, as we potentially might need python-tx-tftp rebuildable in case of fixes/security, as it is (will) actively be used14:17
seb128Laney, thanks14:17
cpaelzersil2100: thanks for looking after chrony (1 line change btw) - if you need anything please let me know14:17
seb128Laney, the desktop bugs 'discussion' was for benefit of the r-t to demonstrate the impact of the bug and why we ask the fix to be accepted, no need to move it I think14:18
seb128but yeah, we did enough writing on that now, we can stop :)14:18
Laneyit seems to be getting onto other bugs14:18
Laneyno need to push back thanks14:18
sil2100cpaelzer: ok, let's get that in14:18
philrochebdmurray: popey: Logout followed by login worked14:19
sil2100cpaelzer: we most probably will have a re-spin anyway, so then this can get in14:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (xenial-proposed/main) [229-4ubuntu21.27 => 229-4ubuntu21.28] (core)14:19
cpaelzerthanks sil210014:19
popeyphilroche excellent14:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted chrony [source] (focal-proposed) [3.5-6ubuntu6]14:20
cpaelzersil2100: sad to hear that we will need another respin thou14:20
* cpaelzer hugs (corona safe) the release Team14:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock [source] (focal-proposed) [67ubuntu20.04.5]14:23
popeysil2100 / cpaelzer just tested the fix on bug 1869571 - and it totally works, and fixes the small icons issue too.14:24
ubot5bug 1869571 in OEM Priority Project "Vertical dual monitor setup with main monitor on bottom causes overview to only use one eighth of screen" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186957114:24
popey(screenshots attached)14:24
cpaelzerthanks popey14:25
cpaelzerI'll need to wait until I can reboot without loosing too mcuh14:26
popeyI just did alt+f2, R, after editing that file14:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: subiquity (focal-proposed/universe) [20.03.3+git147gb34aeda0 => 20.04.1+git45g5f9fae19] (no packageset)14:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted subiquity [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.1+git45g5f9fae19]14:53
jamespagedoko, cpaelzer: checking now but nova-spiceproxy does need to be promoted14:58
jamespagehmm actually it would be better to recommend python3-websockify as that is the package that actually provides the websockify binary.15:01
dokojamespage: can you still change that?15:05
vorlonsil2100: so the reason I was trying to sync pyhamcrest and twisted in the first place is that pyhamcrest is already unbuildable in main due to missing python2 build-dependencies15:07
sil2100Oh hamburgers15:15
bdmurrayI had hamburgers last night!15:24
sil2100vorlon: ok, so this is a tricky situation since it's bad either way right now, it's either pyhamcrest being unbuildable (as now) or python-tx-tftp15:25
vorlonYEAH15:25
vorlonoops15:25
vorlonyeah15:25
sil2100Not sure which one is more likely to require fixes, I see both don't have much going on15:26
jamespagedoko: well I can ask :)15:29
jamespagechoice is upload to switch depends, or promote websockify bin package to main15:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spice-html5 (focal-proposed/main) [0.2.2-0ubuntu1 => 0.2.2-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)15:44
jamespagehi release team - minor tweak from myself so that doko and I can avoid soiling main with a package that is not required ^^15:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spice-html5 [source] (focal-proposed) [0.2.2-0ubuntu2]15:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-mapnik (focal-proposed/universe) [1:0.0~20180723-588fc9062-3ubuntu2 => 1:0.0~20180723-588fc9062-3ubuntu3] (no packageset)15:46
jamespagethankyou :)15:46
Laney<ubuntu-archive-robot> no problem at all!15:46
Laney:p15:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-mapnik [source] (focal-proposed) [1:0.0~20180723-588fc9062-3ubuntu3]15:46
jamespagelol15:47
vorlonsil2100: should we let strace in from -proposed?  currently blocked by hint, and looks like this is the fix for the ftbfs16:05
sil2100vorlon: yes, but we didn't want to let it migrate now as it's a big version jump, which we didn't feel comfortable in accepting so close to the release (though this is a debugging tool and rather low risk)16:13
vorlonsil2100: so what's the plan, if not letting it migrate now?16:13
vorlonmigrating later is not less risky :)16:13
sil2100We were thinking about getting it in as an SRU, since then it can have a proper validation scheme and aging16:14
vorlonso it'll need a reupload then, since there's no SRU bug linked?16:15
vorlonfwiw I personally think it would be better to take it now rather than as an SRU, just because the interfaces of strace are so narrow (debugging tool as you say) and the possible release impact is minimal16:15
Laneyrespins spinning16:18
bdmurrayseb128: Are you looking at bug 1871960?16:19
ubot5bug 1871960 in libgtk3-perl (Ubuntu Focal) "package libpam-modules 1.1.8-3.6ubuntu2.18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: pre-dependency problem - not installing libpam-modules:amd64" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187196016:19
seb128bdmurray, I started poking a bit but I doubt I will get to the bottom of it, if it's urgent feel free to take over or find someone with more available slot (sorry, almost time to call it a day for me, but I will resume on that first thing tomorrow if nobody else has picked it up)16:20
bdmurrayseb128: We think it is a blocker for enabling upgrades.16:22
seb128bdmurray, ack, I agree it's important, sorry day was just crazy and I poked a bit but didn't have much success yet16:26
bdmurrayseb128: okay, we do have a little bit more time since it is an upgrade issue16:26
sil2100vorlon: oh, right, I thought we did have those, but then I guess I said it's not needed (as I forgot about the SRU part and thought only about the block-proposed part)16:27
vorlonseb128: I see that ubuntu-system-service is now a candidate for demotion because gnome-control-center no longer recommends it.  Is gnome-control-center now handling these services independently?16:37
vorlonif it were completely unused I would drop it from the archive, but unity-control-center still recommends it16:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added16:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added16:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added16:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server ppc64el [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added16:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server s390x [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added16:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added16:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added16:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added16:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added16:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] has been updated (20200420)16:51
seb128vorlon, no, the distro patch which was allowing to set a system proxy using the service was commented out some cycles ago so it's a feature gap that needs to be restored but meanwhile there is no point keeping the package in main since it's not in use...16:52
seb128also I don't know if we would still use that backend if we restore the feature16:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added16:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added16:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added16:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added16:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added17:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xubuntu-default-settings (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04.3 => 20.04.4] (xubuntu)17:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added17:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected xubuntu-default-settings [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.4]17:08
sforsheevorlon: not sure who to ping about this, but since you uploaded it recently ... multipath tools isn't happy with linux-kvm, bug 187391217:08
ubot5bug 1873912 in multipath-tools (Ubuntu) "multipathd.service fails to start with linux-kvm kernel" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187391217:08
sforsheeseems to want some modules what we don't have enabled in that kernel17:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added17:09
sforsheesil2100, Laney: ^ fyi17:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xubuntu-default-settings (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04.3 => 20.04.4] (xubuntu)17:21
=== terry__ is now known as trudd
vorlonsforshee: mmm; shouldn't this be fixed in linux-kvm by enabling that module?17:29
sforsheevorlon: it's a possibility, though at least the scsi modules have little other relevance to kvm17:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rabbitmq-server (bionic-backports/main) [3.6.10-1ubuntu0.1 => 3.8.2-0ubuntu1~ubuntu18.04.1] (ubuntu-server)17:32
vorlonsforshee: well it looks like it tries to modprobe any relevant modules and there are warnings for that, but the failure is "DM multipath kernel driver not loaded", so only dm-multipath may be required?17:33
sforsheehmm, possibly17:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rabbitmq-server (eoan-backports/main) [3.7.8-4ubuntu2 => 3.8.2-0ubuntu1~ubuntu19.10.1] (ubuntu-server)17:33
sforsheevorlon: I will try it. We're respinning linux-kvm today anyway, so this is an opportune time17:33
vorlonok17:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: elixir-lang (bionic-backports/universe) [1.3.3-2 => 1.9.1.dfsg-1~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)17:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: erlang (bionic-backports/main) [1:20.2.2+dfsg-1ubuntu2 => 1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)17:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted elixir-lang [source] (bionic-backports) [1.9.1.dfsg-1~ubuntu18.04.1]17:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rabbitmq-server [source] (bionic-backports) [3.8.2-0ubuntu1~ubuntu18.04.1]17:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted erlang [source] (bionic-backports) [1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1]17:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rabbitmq-server [source] (eoan-backports) [3.8.2-0ubuntu1~ubuntu19.10.1]17:35
dokorbalint: is the libc6-lse supposed to be in main?17:38
vorlondoko: it is and I asked him to follow up on seeding it17:39
vorlondoko: but maybe you see a good place to seed it, I didn't see an obvious precedent17:39
dokook, I'll seed it17:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xubuntu-default-settings [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.4]17:41
dokovorlon: you uploaded ubuntu-system-service last, which is ready for demotion. is this intended?17:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: erlang [s390x] (bionic-backports/main) [1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)17:45
vorlondoko: see above discussion with seb128 (and I already demoted it)17:45
dokoahh, ok17:46
rbalintthanks doko!18:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: erlang [ppc64el] (bionic-backports/main) [1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)18:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gui-ufw (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04.1-1 => 20.04.1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate)18:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: erlang [amd64] (bionic-backports/main) [1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)18:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: erlang [i386] (bionic-backports/main) [1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)18:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: erlang [arm64] (bionic-backports/main) [1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)18:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: erlang [armhf] (bionic-backports/main) [1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)18:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted erlang [amd64] (bionic-backports) [1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1]19:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted erlang [armhf] (bionic-backports) [1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1]19:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted erlang [ppc64el] (bionic-backports) [1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1]19:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted erlang [arm64] (bionic-backports) [1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1]19:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted erlang [s390x] (bionic-backports) [1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1]19:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted erlang [i386] (bionic-backports) [1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1]19:04
bdmurraybluesabre: xubuntu-default-settings has migrated and xubuntu images can be built19:12
bluesabrebdmurray: awesome, thanks!19:21
bluesabrebdmurray: how do I do that without rebuilding everybody?19:23
bluesabreI've never clicked the ominous "Request Rebuild" button before :)19:24
bdmurraylet me have a look19:24
bdmurraybluesabre: its listed as re-building already so lets see what happens19:25
bluesabrebdmurray: great!19:26
bdmurrayactually that might be the failed build from a couple of hours ago19:26
mwhudsonmorning19:33
mwhudsongeneral on-fire-ness status?19:33
bdmurrayits a slow burn initial images were created not too long ago19:36
mwhudsoni suppose i should do some testing then19:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qclib (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-0ubuntu1 => 2.1.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)19:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qclib [source] (focal-proposed) [2.1.0-0ubuntu1]19:44
bdmurraybluesabre: we are starting the builds for xubuntu19:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: git (focal-proposed/main) [1:2.25.1-1ubuntu2 => 1:2.25.1-1ubuntu3] (core, i386-whitelist)19:50
cjwatsonbdmurray: Are there likely to be many other image builds happening tonight?  I'd like to do a Launchpad rollout tonight if I can manage it - it shouldn't actually disrupt anything, but wanted to check19:53
bdmurraycjwatson: No not likely given sil2100 and Laney have taken off for the night. The xubuntu one should be the last one.19:54
cjwatsonOK19:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: horizon (focal-proposed/main) [3:18.2.1~git2020041013.754804667-0ubuntu2 => 3:18.2.1~git2020041013.754804667-0ubuntu3] (openstack, ubuntu-server)19:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] (20200420.1) has been added20:01
coreycbhi release team, I uploaded a new version of horizon with a bug fix. I don't plan to do any more uploads this week for openstack fwiw.20:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lubuntu-meta (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04.7 => 20.04.8] (lubuntu)20:04
The_LoudSpeaker^ this is to fix a previous revert20:04
sforsheevorlon: enabling dm-multipath works, I20:17
sforsheeI'll get a new linux-kvm building20:17
bdmurrayThe_LoudSpeaker: Could you elaborate on what you mean by "fix a previous revert" and say something about the importance of this upload so the release team can evaluate including it?20:28
The_LoudSpeakerYeah.20:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: remmina (focal-proposed/main) [1.4.2+dfsg-1ubuntu1 => 1.4.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)20:29
The_LoudSpeakersooo @tsimonq2 reverted a commit here https://phab.lubuntu.me/rSEEDe6e116cc8eae962950b37fad88d686191bc274b5 to remove lubuntu-grub-theme which has a important bug right now.20:31
The_LoudSpeakerwhich lead to update of meta to 20.04.720:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python2.7 (focal-proposed/universe) [2.7.18~rc1-2 => 2.7.18-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)20:33
The_LoudSpeakerBut if you notice that xfonts-efont-unicode which is required for Lubuntu's xscreensaver theme also got removed20:33
The_LoudSpeaker20.04.8 just adds xfonts-efont-unicode back20:33
The_LoudSpeakercoressponding to https://phab.lubuntu.me/rSEED3468321dfdf2f01d04172fc7c8812f7da352c47a20:33
doko^^^please consider accepting python2.7, final release, no code changes20:34
The_LoudSpeaker^^ bdmurray20:34
The_LoudSpeakerxfonts-efont-unicode is necessary as it is the font which we use in xscreensaver dialoguebox20:37
bdmurraygot it thanks20:41
sil2100bdmurray: hey! You need help with the failed builds?20:41
sil2100I can clear those out so you can press the buttan20:41
bdmurraysil2100: vorlon built them20:42
sil2100Excellent20:42
sil2100\o/20:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wine (focal-proposed/universe) [5.0-3 => 5.0-3ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)20:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wine [source] (focal-proposed) [5.0-3ubuntu1]20:55
wgrantCould someone look at ruby2.7 soonish? I think it would have been autoapproved under the new i386-whitelist ignore rule21:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-subtitles (focal-proposed/universe) [1.4.2-1 => 1.6-2.1] (cli-mono) (sync)21:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ogmrip (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-2build1 => 1.0.1-3] (no packageset) (sync)21:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ogmrip [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.0.1-3]21:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: googleplay-api (focal-proposed/universe) [0.4.4-1 => 0.4.4+git20200310-2] (no packageset) (sync)22:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: birdtray (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.0+ds-2 => 1.8.0+ds-1] (no packageset) (sync)22:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted birdtray [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.8.0+ds-1]22:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted googleplay-api [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.4.4+git20200310-2]22:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-kvm (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1008.8 => 5.4.0-1009.9] (core, kernel) (sync)22:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-kvm (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0.1008.8 => 5.4.0.1009.9] (core, kernel) (sync)22:48

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!