[00:28] <xnox> apw: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845801 how come nvidia-drm.modeset=1 not the default? Also I think my laptop hangs on boot too, as described in the bug.
[00:28] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1845801 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 (Ubuntu Eoan) "[nvidia] Automatic login fails and then all subsequent logins fail. Killing gnome-session-binary fixes it, or just not using automatic login." [Low,Confirmed]
[00:28] <xnox> For me gdm hangs / never comes up.
[00:30] <xnox> Also, failing to boot any arm64 images off usb.
[00:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sugar-artwork (focal-proposed/universe) [0.116-1 => 0.117-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[00:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sugar-artwork [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.117-1]
[00:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sugar-toolkit-gtk3 (focal-proposed/universe) [0.116-6 => 0.117-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[00:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sugar-toolkit-gtk3 [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.117-1]
[00:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: subtitleeditor (focal-proposed/universe) [0.54.0-3build1 => 0.54.0-4] (ubuntustudio) (sync)
[00:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: simde (focal-proposed/primary) [0.0.0.git.20200415-1]
[00:54] <RAOF> xnox: Hm. For me, *setting* `nvidia-drm.modeset=1` resulted in all manner of broken behaviour (that was a hybrid system). This might be a hybrid/not-hybrid problem?
[00:56] <xnox> Rao
[00:56] <xnox> RAOF: with or without splash? And on Focal, right?
[00:57] <RAOF> With splash, on focal.
[00:58] <RAOF> But earlier in the cycle, and my hybrid laptop decided to die.
[01:00] <RAOF> My bug was that starting X as non-root would silently fall *unless* there was an existing instance of X started as root already running.
[01:02] <RAOF> Hm, now that I think if it maybe that *wasn't* focal. My laptop died earlier than that. Must have been eoan.
[02:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ruby2.7 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.7.0-5ubuntu1]
[03:31] <handsome_feng> Hi, Does wallpaper changes need UIFe (Not the default wallpapers) ?
[03:37] <handsome_feng> If add a new wallpaper need UIFe , can I just drop a wallpaper which have license problem?
[05:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby2.7 (focal-proposed/main) [2.7.0-4ubuntu1 => 2.7.0-5ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[05:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yubioath-desktop (focal-proposed/universe) [5.0.2-3 => 5.0.3-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[05:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yubioath-desktop [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.0.3-1]
[07:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntukylin-wallpapers (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04.1 => 20.04.2] (ubuntukylin)
[07:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby2.7 (focal-proposed/main) [2.7.0-4ubuntu1 => 2.7.0-5ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[07:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: boinc (focal-proposed/universe) [7.16.6+dfsg-1 => 7.16.6+dfsg-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[07:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sass-spec (focal-proposed/universe) [3.6.3-1.1 => 3.6.3-1.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[07:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted boinc [sync] (focal-proposed) [7.16.6+dfsg-1]
[07:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby2.7 (focal-proposed/main) [2.7.0-4ubuntu1 => 2.7.0-5ubuntu1ppa1] (i386-whitelist)
[07:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sass-spec [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.6.3-1.1]
[07:31] <LocutusOfBorg> of course the ruby2.7 ubuntu1ppa1 was meant to my ppa, not sure why dput allows me to upload on ubuntu :/ /me grabs coffee
[07:32] <wgrant> LocutusOfBorg: Morning. I actually already uploaded symbol fixes based on your failed build, now waiting in the queue. Built fine everywhere in https://launchpad.net/~wgrant/+archive/ubuntu/nonvirt/+sourcepub/11195715/+listing-archive-extra
[07:40] <LocutusOfBorg> nice!
[07:40] <wgrant> LocutusOfBorg: Mind if I reject your two?
[07:40] <wgrant> Or at least the ppa1 one :)
[07:41] <LocutusOfBorg> sure!
[07:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ruby2.7 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.7.0-5ubuntu1ppa1]
[07:43] <sil2100> Wimpress: hello! Can you give me the powers to update that discourse thread? ;)
[07:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ruby2.7 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.7.0-5ubuntu1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ruby2.7 [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.7.0-5]
[07:45] <philroche> Wimpress: Me too please
[07:45] <sil2100> apw: hey! We seem to have a few NBSes related to kernels right now
[07:47] <mwhudson> LocutusOfBorg: i have a dput wrapper that stops me doing things like that
[07:48] <mwhudson> LocutusOfBorg: https://github.com/mwhudson/dput-wrap
[07:49] <philroche> Morning all. I am testing hyperv desktop image builds in prep for release and build is failing due to `gamemode:amd64 Depends on libinih1:amd64 < none @un H > (>= 48) can't be satisfied!` I cannot replicate this issue locally on focal install. Is anyone aware of dependency issues with 'gamemode' package?
[07:49] <sil2100> tjaalton: hey! I see the new linux-oem-5.6 kernel is still blocked in -proposed, any ETA for getting it into release?
[07:51] <sil2100> philroche: hm, not that I am aware of, no
[07:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireshark (focal-proposed/universe) [3.2.2-1 => 3.2.3-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[07:51] <philroche> sil2100: ack. I'll keep digging
[07:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireshark [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.2.3-1]
[07:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntukylin-wallpapers [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.2]
[07:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.policy [source] (focal-proposed) [3.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[08:02] <tjaalton> sil2100: well, I wonder if it could be a post-release update, sort of like being a part of the current sru cycle while in reality it's a devel series kernel.. but I can also check if it could be released soon and included in the image
[08:03] <tjaalton> dkms tests failing because it's 5.6, it seems
[08:03] <tjaalton> thought I marked them failing for good, but apparently not
[08:07] <apw> sil2100, ack
[08:14] <xnox> philroche:  are you building "main-only" or "with-universe enabled"? I see that gamemode is currently in main, but not seed, and thus wants to be demoted. And libinih1 is only available in universe. Also gamemode is up for demotion at https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.html
[08:15] <xnox> philroche:  should gamemode be in main, if it's seeded in the hyperv image? then we need to added to either like desktop-supported or cloud-supported?
[08:16] <sil2100> tjaalton: ok, let's leave it in -proposed then
[08:16] <seb128> xnox, gamemode was added to desktop-minimal on friday
[08:17] <seb128> xnox, philroche, I will fix it, I overlooked that libinih was in universe when I did the gamemode update that enabled it as a depends
[08:18] <xnox> seb128:  sure. but i'm trying to understand why components-missmatches wants to demote it. as if the seed change is stuck somewhere
[08:27] <sil2100> Ok everyone, we're currently waiting for some staged packages to migrate out of -proposed (like glibc etc.)  and then we'll be spinning our first release candidates
[08:28] <cjwatson> ddebs.u.c has caught up
[08:31] <LocutusOfBorg> mwhudson, thanks, why not integrate on dput upstream?
[08:32] <mwhudson> LocutusOfBorg: too lazy!
[08:32] <LocutusOfBorg> converting into a dput profile!
[08:32] <mwhudson> LocutusOfBorg: is that a dput-ng thing?
[08:33] <mwhudson> sil2100: eta on that?
[08:33]  * mwhudson wonders about a quick subiquity snap build and promote
[08:34] <sil2100> mwhudson: anything critical in that?
[08:34] <sil2100> Some saucy fixes?
[08:34] <mwhudson> sil2100: some autoinstall bugfixes
[08:35] <LocutusOfBorg> probably yes mwhudson
[08:36] <Laney> vorlon: I'll let the team know
[08:36] <sil2100> mwhudson: it's all tested, right? Guess build+promote is quite fast, to what I would say: yes
[08:36] <mwhudson> sil2100: tested, let's say that i'm confident that it's better than what's in stable/ubuntu-20.04 right now
[08:39] <LocutusOfBorg> mwhudson, probably "hooks" or similar
[08:39] <LocutusOfBorg> meh, who remembers?
[08:39] <sil2100> Since though glibc just migrated, there's the kylin wallpaper package that I think I'd still like to have that in the release
[08:39] <sil2100> mwhudson: go for it!
[08:39] <mwhudson> LocutusOfBorg: i certainly never figured it out, which is why it's a perl wrapper still!
[08:39] <xnox> seb128:  running germinate locally results in: ? Unknown desktop-minimal package: gamemode
[08:40] <xnox> seb128:  no idea, why
[08:40] <mwhudson> sil2100: turns out the automatic import github -> lp ran at exactly the right time so the snap was already building
[08:40] <philroche> xnox universe appears to be enabled
[08:41] <philroche> seb128: Thank you
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lubuntu-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.7]
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxd [source] (focal-proposed) [1:0.9]
[08:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (focal-proposed/main) [159 => 160] (ubuntu-desktop)
[08:47] <seb128> handsome_feng, ^
[08:48] <Laney> argh
[08:48] <seb128> the upload fixes bug #1873543
[08:48] <ubot5> bug 1873543 in ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (Ubuntu) "The version 159 revert the translations of ubuntukylin" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1873543
[08:50] <Wimpress> Morning all o/
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice-dictionaries [sync] (focal-proposed) [1:6.4.3-1]
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu [source] (focal-proposed) [160]
[08:52] <xnox> seb128:  ok, updated my mirror, and now germinate is happy with everything. still no idea about components-missmatches
[08:53] <handsome_feng> seb128: Thanks!
[09:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected spirv-headers [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.5.1+git20200409-1]
[09:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected vulkan-loader [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.2.135.0-2]
[09:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected spirv-tools [sync] (focal-proposed) [2020.2-1]
[09:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-launchpadlib [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.10.13-1]
[09:15] <mwhudson> sil2100: subiquity published to the appropriate places
[09:23] <sil2100> mwhudson: \o/
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gamemode (focal-proposed/main) [1.5.1-0ubuntu2 => 1.5.1-0ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[09:30] <seb128> ^ that fixes the gamemode issue trying to pull a lib from universe than philroche reported a bit earlier than is breaking hyperv images (and probably problematic for Ubuntu builds as well)
[09:31] <seb128> the diff is non trivial but it's basically reverted the recent .1 upload changes and going back to the codebase that was reviewing during the MIR
[09:32] <philroche> seb128: Thanks. I'll verify once it's accepted
[09:33] <xnox> doko:  bzr branch lp:ubuntu-archive-scripts: ./auto-accept debug => should say why things are not getting auto-accepted.
[09:33] <xnox> doko:  but also i guess comment out queue accept call at the end of it, just in case it uses your AA powers.
[09:33] <sil2100> seb128: hey! Could you upload it with the patch having a description of what's going on? Since we'll just be confused if we look at it in the future
[09:34] <seb128> sil2100, I could, I do plan to revert than change in g* when it opens, we just need to MIR libinih
[09:34] <seb128> it feels late to do that now in focal though
[09:34] <cjwatson> "./auto-accept debug"> kinda needs actual option parsing
[09:34] <cjwatson> Could easily enough be ./auto-accept --debug --dry-run
[09:35] <xnox> Laney:  cjwatson: yeah, we can't figure out why gcc-snapshot was not auto-accepted, we thought that it should be, despite being in the "i386" seed.
[09:35] <xnox> or is auto-accept off at this point?
[09:35] <Laney> no it's not
[09:36] <sil2100> seb128: ok, if you could upload then we'd accept that one, I'll reject the one without a patch comment
[09:36] <alexaf> Hello people. I intend to create a local mirror of Ubuntu Focal after it's officially released. Is there a way to get an estimate of the needed disk space? Thanks
[09:37] <seb128> sil2100, ok, that's for you paperwork lovers :)
[09:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gamemode (focal-proposed/main) [1.5.1-0ubuntu2 => 1.5.1-0ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[09:38] <seb128> sil2100, ^ enjoy
[09:39] <sil2100> seb128: thank you!
[09:40] <seb128> sil2100, yw!
[09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gamemode [source] (focal-proposed) [1.5.1-0ubuntu3]
[09:57] <sil2100> seb128: oh, one more thing, should we still build dep on libinih* there?
[09:58] <seb128> sil2100, I'm unsure, I went for minimal risk and just revert to what we had in Debian/the archive for cycles
[09:58] <doko> apw, sforshee, wgrant: can linux-riscv64 be demoted, or should it be seeded?
[09:58] <sil2100> seb128: hm, ok
[09:58] <sil2100> Makes sense
[09:59] <seb128> sil2100, it's probably not needed no but I didn't want to start doing cleanups and risk introducing another problem because I overlooked something
[10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gamemode [source] (focal-proposed) [1.5.1-0ubuntu3]
[10:03] <seb128> opinion on syncing glib-networking from https://packages.qa.debian.org/g/glib-networking/news/20200417T084838Z.html ?
[10:04] <Laney> seb128: file an SRU bug, include the bug reference
[10:04] <seb128> it feels a bit late but it has basically one commit which is ' Reenable TLS 1.0/1.1 due to COVID-19 '
[10:04] <seb128> Laney, do you want to maybe consider it for release? if not I just put that lower on my todo, SRUs can wait
[10:05] <Laney> I mean maybe, if it's in the queue we can decide later
[10:06] <seb128> k, I will deal with some other things before and see if I find the motiviation to do the SRU paperowrk after lunch :)
[10:06] <doko> binutils-riscv64-linux-gnu still wants to demote, component-mismatches still doesn't include riscv64
[10:08] <xnox> seb128:  we re-enabled it in Firefox, Chrome, Chromium, so humans can access covid websites. Are there any human visible browsers that use glib-networking?
[10:09] <xnox> doko:  i think linux-riscv64 should be seeded
[10:11] <seb128> xnox, yes, the GNOME one (epiphany-browser)
[10:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glib-networking (focal-proposed/main) [2.64.1-1 => 2.64.2-1build1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[10:20] <seb128> ^ k, in between option, uploaded with a bug reference but the bug isn't SRU compliant yet but that way it can be made later if needed
[10:20] <seb128> (also I uploaded the wrong one first so rejected/uploaded again)
[10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected glib-networking [source] (focal-proposed) [2.64.2-1build1]
[10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glib-networking (focal-proposed/main) [2.64.1-1 => 2.64.2-1build1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[10:25] <xnox> doko:  updated seeded kernel packages with audio review from apw https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/platform/commit/?id=c0e59184d807f50ec6f89d3800758691fda1b601
[10:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected qemu [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.2-3ubuntu6]
[10:34] <xnox> doko:  gcc-snapshot lack of auto-accept fix is in https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/ubuntu-archive-scripts/auto-accept-i386-only-packages/+merge/382569
[10:35] <sil2100> Ok everyone! The britney -proposed freeze block is now ON
[10:35] <xnox> boom
[10:35] <doko> xnox: add community-maas there as well?
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (focal-proposed/main) [1:4.2-3ubuntu5 => 1:4.2-3ubuntu6] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[10:36] <xnox> doko:  probably
[10:36] <xnox> doko:  still need to fix community-missmatches for community stuff
[10:47] <philroche> seb128: xnox: Thank you both. Desktop hyperv images now successfully build.
[10:47] <seb128> philroche, great!
[11:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted faudio [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04-2]
[11:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (focal-proposed) [6.0.0-0ubuntu8]
[11:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virglrenderer [source] (focal-proposed) [0.8.2-1ubuntu1]
[11:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.2-3ubuntu6]
[11:08] <xnox> doko:  https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/ubuntu-archive-tools/riscv64/+merge/382573 fixing up adding riscv64 to components-missmatches
[11:12] <Laney> https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/ubuntu-archive-scripts/trunk/revision/279
[11:13] <Laney> should fix mysterious non-auto-accepts that somebody was complaining about earlier
[11:14] <Laney> seb128: gamemode is still in universe, could you promote it please?
[11:56] <Laney> stgraber: could you add paride (~legovini) to ubuntu-qa-website-devel maybe?
[11:57] <Laney> we just noticed he's missing some permissions and this seems like the simplest way to grant them
[12:01] <Laney> huh, component-mismatches is from thursday
[12:02] <Laney> xnox: is that something to do with you
[12:05] <xnox> Laney:  thanks, so instead of revieing a branch from me https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/ubuntu-archive-scripts/auto-accept-i386-only-packages/+merge/382569 you two create your own and merge that
[12:05] <seb128> Laney, I promoted it on friday, looking at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gamemode/+publishinghistory it looks like doko demoted it a bit earlier, unsure why?
[12:05] <xnox> Laney:  please reject mine one, i guess
[12:05] <Laney> didn't see it, sorry
[12:05] <xnox> seb128:  it is in components-missmatches report.
[12:05] <Laney> see my previous comment ab out component-mismatches
[12:05] <xnox> doko:  please stop demoting things. something is odd with components-missmatches
[12:06] <Laney> and I can't reject it, no permissions
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sylpheed (focal-proposed/universe) [3.5.1-1ubuntu5 => 3.7.0-6ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sylpheed [source] (focal-proposed) [3.7.0-6ubuntu1]
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: gcc-8-cross (focal-release/primary) [33ubuntu2]
[12:09] <seb128> Laney, k, promoted again
[12:09] <seb128> hopefully that doesn't trigger that bug when promoting again makes things vanish (I don't remember the specifics)
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: gcc-8-cross-ports (focal-release/primary) [27ubuntu2]
[12:11] <Laney> don't think that happens any more anyway
[12:12] <Laney> ok cowboyed a fix for component-mismatche
[12:12] <Laney> s
[12:15] <doko> I went over component mismatches this morning. I only saw gamesmode on the list of demotions
[12:16] <stgraber> Laney: done
[12:16] <Laney> maybe someone in ubuntu-archive could review https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/ubuntu-archive-tools/riscv64/+merge/382573 so I can uncowboy it
[12:16] <Laney> stgraber: cheers!
[12:16] <Laney> seb128: and thanks for the promotion
[12:16] <kanashiro> locutus__: thanks for the heads-up about ruby2.7, I didn't notice it failed in riscv64 for instance. However, the changes you proposed FTBFS in armhf due to symbols changes: https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+sourcepub/11195317/+listing-archive-extra
[12:16] <seb128> Laney, np!
[12:18] <wgrant> kanashiro: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/475372268/ruby2.7_2.7.0-4ubuntu1_2.7.0-5ubuntu1.diff.gz (from the focal-proposed queue) fixes the build on 32-bit architectures.
[12:18] <paride> stgraber, thanks!
[12:21] <kanashiro> wgrant: great, I'll apply those changes in Debian. Thanks!
[12:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ddtp-translations (focal-proposed/universe) [20200416.1 => 20200420.1] (no packageset)
[12:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ddtp-translations [source] (focal-proposed) [20200420.1]
[13:06] <sil2100> vorlon: hey! Was looking at the twisted and pyhamcrest uploads - I see some of the dropped python-twisted- packages have some reverse dependencies that might need dealing with, one is python-cyclone (which I think would be good for removal) but the other is python-tx-tftp, which is a stale main package
[13:06] <sil2100> (wonder why it's in main, it's not seeded anywhere it seems)
[13:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-8-cross-ports [sync] (focal-release) [27ubuntu2]
[13:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-8-cross [sync] (focal-release) [33ubuntu2]
=== s8321414_ is now known as s8321414
[13:21] <doko> mwhudson: golang-1.14: subscribed foundations and promoted
[13:24] <doko> cpaelzer, jamespage: nova-spiceproxy is pulled in from supported-misc-servers. ok to promote?
[13:24] <doko> the binary
[13:27] <doko> seb128, Laney: yelp now recommends docbook-xml (universe)
[13:29] <seb128> doko, feel free to promote docbook-xml, it was in main in xenial and desktop-packages is already subscribed
[13:31] <doko> seb128: done, including sgml-data
[13:31] <seb128> doko, thanks
[13:31] <Laney> merci
[13:41] <doko> jamespage, coreycb: spice-html5 recommends the websockify binary. ok to promote, or do you want to lower that to a suggests?
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (focal-proposed/main) [67ubuntu20.04.4 => 67ubuntu20.04.5] (ubuntu-desktop)
[13:42] <cpaelzer> doko: I thought that was promoted in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/websockify/+bug/1108935/comments/28
[13:42] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1108935 in websockify (Ubuntu) "[MIR] websockify, spice-html5" [High,Fix released]
[13:42] <cpaelzer> doko: did it get auto-demoted since then?
[13:44] <doko> I only see it now on c-m
[13:44] <cpaelzer> for  nova-spiceprox I guess the answer is yes, but would want jamespage to answer
[13:46] <sforshee> sil2100, Laney: we have a networking driver bug that we're trying to confirm a fix for (bug 1871182). I don't know that this is hard respin material, but would be good to include if there's an opportunity
[13:46] <ubot5> bug 1871182 in initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) "[RTL810xE] No ethernet connection" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1871182
[13:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (eoan-proposed/main) [242-7ubuntu3.7 => 242-7ubuntu3.8] (core)
[13:48] <sil2100> sforshee: thanks for the heads up, the fix would be in the kernel then? What is the usual turn-around for a kernel respin?
[13:49] <sil2100> sforshee: would that be only for the linux kernel or also for linux-oem-5.6 ?
[13:50] <sforshee> sil2100: yes in the kernel. The build is 8-10 hours, depending on how long armhf takes. oem-5.6 should already be fixed, as the report says 5.5 tests ok
[13:50] <Laney> I guess it would be good to kick off builds in parallel with verifying the fix
[13:51] <sforshee> yeah, we can do that
[13:51] <Laney> 👍
[13:54] <sil2100> popey: hello! Could you give me the power to edit that focal-release-status discourse post? :)
[13:54] <popey> do you have an account now? I couldn't find you previously
[13:55] <popey> nvm, found you
[13:55] <popey> done
[13:55] <sil2100> popey: thanks! Yeah, I didn't have an account apaprently last time
[13:56] <philroche> popey: Me too please - for cloud image updates. Discourse username philroche
[13:56] <popey> you already should have
[13:56] <popey> i added you 3 days ago
[13:57] <philroche> popey: I see no option to edit though
[13:57] <sil2100> popey: hm, I think I still not see teh edit button
[13:58] <popey> it's at the bottom, next to 3 little dots
[13:58] <popey> https://imgur.com/a/1Dg3wfg
[13:59] <sil2100> popey: weird! Don't have that, hm
[13:59] <popey> one moment
[13:59] <philroche> Nor me https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/XOSBQ6eR/image.png
[13:59] <sil2100> popey: Brian even screen shared and I don't seem to have that edit thingy nor the pencil on top
[13:59] <popey> ah, new accounts, you're untrusted newbs :D
[14:00] <popey> sil2100 try now, refresh the page
[14:00] <popey> philroche same, try now (although probably not at the same time ;D)
[14:00] <sil2100> Ah ha!
[14:00] <sil2100> I have it now!
[14:00] <popey> huzzah
[14:00] <sil2100> popey: thanks ;)
[14:01] <popey> feel free to let me know if any extra rls people need access
[14:01] <philroche> Bingo. Me too. Thanks popey
[14:01] <popey> Great Success.
[14:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chrony (focal-proposed/main) [3.5-6ubuntu5 => 3.5-6ubuntu6] (core)
[14:03] <seb128> sil2100, Laney, others: can we get the gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock upload be considered for release? it's a pretty annoying issue which has different side effect on the shell, I'm a bit worried it creates other issue than the one referenced and I would prefer to see the fix in the release if possible
[14:04] <popey> The vertical monitor issue with tiny icons? Yes. super annoying :)
[14:04] <seb128> popey, dunno about the tiny icon, but vertical monitor which leads the overview to be like 1/8th of the screen
[14:05] <popey> https://imgur.com/a/AoQKfFa this
[14:05] <seb128> popey, https://launchpadlibrarian.net/473594511/Screenshot_20200408_130437-search-bar-half-visible.png is how I saw it when testing
[14:05] <popey> yes, same
[14:06] <seb128> by "tiny" you mean 'cut"?
[14:06] <popey> no, press super, don't search for app, press "All", press super again
[14:06] <seb128> (just making sure we are talking about the same thing, maybe there is also a problem where icons have the wrong size)
[14:06] <popey> you'll see no icons until the animation happens
[14:06] <seb128> k
[14:06] <popey> well, there's two bugs here, I suspect they're rleated
[14:06] <cpaelzer> hi release team, can I ask to accept chrony in focal-unapproved please
[14:07] <seb128> anyway, we agree having the fix would be good :)
[14:07] <cpaelzer> no need to stall the ISO build by it, but it would be great to get it into -proposed for another potential respin to pick it up
[14:07] <cpaelzer> sil2100: are you the queue-master right now or can you point me to who I should ping?
[14:07] <cpaelzer> I have already added a full SRU template to the bug just in case
[14:08] <cpaelzer> rbalint: thanks for finding and filing BTW
[14:11] <sil2100> cpaelzer: looking
[14:11] <popey> sil2100 this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mZZtClVOSg
[14:12]  * popey tries to find the bug 
[14:12] <sil2100> Wow, those are really tiny icons
[14:14] <sil2100> vorlon: ok, so I had a quick chat with sparkiegeek about the python-txtftp thingy - it's still used, but only the python3 versions, although apparently dropping python-txtftp is non-trivial
[14:14] <sil2100> vorlon: (the python2 version of it)
[14:14] <philroche> sil2100: popey: Wimpress: Do any of you know hoe to get edit access on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FocalFossa/ReleaseNotes ? - currently marked as "Immutable Page"
[14:15] <bdmurray> philroche: That's something with your account as I can edit it
[14:15] <popey> philroche logout / login / refresh/ sacrifice a chicken in a pentagram
[14:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (bionic-proposed/main) [237-3ubuntu10.39 => 237-3ubuntu10.40] (core)
[14:15] <cpaelzer> popey: your icons seem a bit like the fix to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1869571 overshoot
[14:15] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1869571 in OEM Priority Project "Vertical dual monitor setup with main monitor on bottom causes overview to only use one eighth of screen" [High,New]
[14:16]  * philroche goes to find a chicken
[14:16] <cpaelzer> formerly only half visible, now all fitting but very very small
[14:16] <popey> cpaelzer yes, this was the bug we would like fixed
[14:16] <sil2100> vorlon: so basically if we accept your twisted upload, this would potentially make python-tx-tftp unbuildable (and the python-txtftp binary uninstallable)
[14:16] <Laney> maybe move talk of desktop bugs to #ubuntu-desktop
[14:17] <Laney> seb128: will look
[14:17] <sil2100> vorlon: which sadly feels like not the right way to go right now, as we potentially might need python-tx-tftp rebuildable in case of fixes/security, as it is (will) actively be used
[14:17] <seb128> Laney, thanks
[14:17] <cpaelzer> sil2100: thanks for looking after chrony (1 line change btw) - if you need anything please let me know
[14:18] <seb128> Laney, the desktop bugs 'discussion' was for benefit of the r-t to demonstrate the impact of the bug and why we ask the fix to be accepted, no need to move it I think
[14:18] <seb128> but yeah, we did enough writing on that now, we can stop :)
[14:18] <Laney> it seems to be getting onto other bugs
[14:18] <Laney> no need to push back thanks
[14:18] <sil2100> cpaelzer: ok, let's get that in
[14:19] <philroche> bdmurray: popey: Logout followed by login worked
[14:19] <sil2100> cpaelzer: we most probably will have a re-spin anyway, so then this can get in
[14:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (xenial-proposed/main) [229-4ubuntu21.27 => 229-4ubuntu21.28] (core)
[14:19] <cpaelzer> thanks sil2100
[14:19] <popey> philroche excellent
[14:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted chrony [source] (focal-proposed) [3.5-6ubuntu6]
[14:20] <cpaelzer> sil2100: sad to hear that we will need another respin thou
[14:20]  * cpaelzer hugs (corona safe) the release Team
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock [source] (focal-proposed) [67ubuntu20.04.5]
[14:24] <popey> sil2100 / cpaelzer just tested the fix on bug 1869571 - and it totally works, and fixes the small icons issue too.
[14:24] <ubot5> bug 1869571 in OEM Priority Project "Vertical dual monitor setup with main monitor on bottom causes overview to only use one eighth of screen" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1869571
[14:24] <popey> (screenshots attached)
[14:25] <cpaelzer> thanks popey
[14:26] <cpaelzer> I'll need to wait until I can reboot without loosing too mcuh
[14:26] <popey> I just did alt+f2, R, after editing that file
[14:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: subiquity (focal-proposed/universe) [20.03.3+git147gb34aeda0 => 20.04.1+git45g5f9fae19] (no packageset)
[14:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted subiquity [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.1+git45g5f9fae19]
[14:58] <jamespage> doko, cpaelzer: checking now but nova-spiceproxy does need to be promoted
[15:01] <jamespage> hmm actually it would be better to recommend python3-websockify as that is the package that actually provides the websockify binary.
[15:05] <doko> jamespage: can you still change that?
[15:07] <vorlon> sil2100: so the reason I was trying to sync pyhamcrest and twisted in the first place is that pyhamcrest is already unbuildable in main due to missing python2 build-dependencies
[15:15] <sil2100> Oh hamburgers
[15:24] <bdmurray> I had hamburgers last night!
[15:25] <sil2100> vorlon: ok, so this is a tricky situation since it's bad either way right now, it's either pyhamcrest being unbuildable (as now) or python-tx-tftp
[15:25] <vorlon> YEAH
[15:25] <vorlon> oops
[15:25] <vorlon> yeah
[15:26] <sil2100> Not sure which one is more likely to require fixes, I see both don't have much going on
[15:29] <jamespage> doko: well I can ask :)
[15:30] <jamespage> choice is upload to switch depends, or promote websockify bin package to main
[15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spice-html5 (focal-proposed/main) [0.2.2-0ubuntu1 => 0.2.2-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[15:45] <jamespage> hi release team - minor tweak from myself so that doko and I can avoid soiling main with a package that is not required ^^
[15:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spice-html5 [source] (focal-proposed) [0.2.2-0ubuntu2]
[15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-mapnik (focal-proposed/universe) [1:0.0~20180723-588fc9062-3ubuntu2 => 1:0.0~20180723-588fc9062-3ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[15:46] <jamespage> thankyou :)
[15:46] <Laney> <ubuntu-archive-robot> no problem at all!
[15:46] <Laney> :p
[15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-mapnik [source] (focal-proposed) [1:0.0~20180723-588fc9062-3ubuntu3]
[15:47] <jamespage> lol
[16:05] <vorlon> sil2100: should we let strace in from -proposed?  currently blocked by hint, and looks like this is the fix for the ftbfs
[16:13] <sil2100> vorlon: yes, but we didn't want to let it migrate now as it's a big version jump, which we didn't feel comfortable in accepting so close to the release (though this is a debugging tool and rather low risk)
[16:13] <vorlon> sil2100: so what's the plan, if not letting it migrate now?
[16:13] <vorlon> migrating later is not less risky :)
[16:14] <sil2100> We were thinking about getting it in as an SRU, since then it can have a proper validation scheme and aging
[16:15] <vorlon> so it'll need a reupload then, since there's no SRU bug linked?
[16:15] <vorlon> fwiw I personally think it would be better to take it now rather than as an SRU, just because the interfaces of strace are so narrow (debugging tool as you say) and the possible release impact is minimal
[16:18] <Laney> respins spinning
[16:19] <bdmurray> seb128: Are you looking at bug 1871960?
[16:19] <ubot5> bug 1871960 in libgtk3-perl (Ubuntu Focal) "package libpam-modules 1.1.8-3.6ubuntu2.18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: pre-dependency problem - not installing libpam-modules:amd64" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1871960
[16:20] <seb128> bdmurray, I started poking a bit but I doubt I will get to the bottom of it, if it's urgent feel free to take over or find someone with more available slot (sorry, almost time to call it a day for me, but I will resume on that first thing tomorrow if nobody else has picked it up)
[16:22] <bdmurray> seb128: We think it is a blocker for enabling upgrades.
[16:26] <seb128> bdmurray, ack, I agree it's important, sorry day was just crazy and I poked a bit but didn't have much success yet
[16:26] <bdmurray> seb128: okay, we do have a little bit more time since it is an upgrade issue
[16:27] <sil2100> vorlon: oh, right, I thought we did have those, but then I guess I said it's not needed (as I forgot about the SRU part and thought only about the block-proposed part)
[16:37] <vorlon> seb128: I see that ubuntu-system-service is now a candidate for demotion because gnome-control-center no longer recommends it.  Is gnome-control-center now handling these services independently?
[16:38] <vorlon> if it were completely unused I would drop it from the archive, but unity-control-center still recommends it
[16:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added
[16:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added
[16:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added
[16:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server ppc64el [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added
[16:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server s390x [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added
[16:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added
[16:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added
[16:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added
[16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added
[16:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] has been updated (20200420)
[16:52] <seb128> vorlon, no, the distro patch which was allowing to set a system proxy using the service was commented out some cycles ago so it's a feature gap that needs to be restored but meanwhile there is no point keeping the package in main since it's not in use...
[16:53] <seb128> also I don't know if we would still use that backend if we restore the feature
[16:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added
[16:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added
[16:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added
[16:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added
[17:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added
[17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xubuntu-default-settings (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04.3 => 20.04.4] (xubuntu)
[17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added
[17:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected xubuntu-default-settings [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.4]
[17:08] <sforshee> vorlon: not sure who to ping about this, but since you uploaded it recently ... multipath tools isn't happy with linux-kvm, bug 1873912
[17:08] <ubot5> bug 1873912 in multipath-tools (Ubuntu) "multipathd.service fails to start with linux-kvm kernel" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1873912
[17:08] <sforshee> seems to want some modules what we don't have enabled in that kernel
[17:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Focal Final] (20200420) has been added
[17:15] <sforshee> sil2100, Laney: ^ fyi
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xubuntu-default-settings (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04.3 => 20.04.4] (xubuntu)
=== terry__ is now known as trudd
[17:29] <vorlon> sforshee: mmm; shouldn't this be fixed in linux-kvm by enabling that module?
[17:32] <sforshee> vorlon: it's a possibility, though at least the scsi modules have little other relevance to kvm
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rabbitmq-server (bionic-backports/main) [3.6.10-1ubuntu0.1 => 3.8.2-0ubuntu1~ubuntu18.04.1] (ubuntu-server)
[17:33] <vorlon> sforshee: well it looks like it tries to modprobe any relevant modules and there are warnings for that, but the failure is "DM multipath kernel driver not loaded", so only dm-multipath may be required?
[17:33] <sforshee> hmm, possibly
[17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rabbitmq-server (eoan-backports/main) [3.7.8-4ubuntu2 => 3.8.2-0ubuntu1~ubuntu19.10.1] (ubuntu-server)
[17:33] <sforshee> vorlon: I will try it. We're respinning linux-kvm today anyway, so this is an opportune time
[17:34] <vorlon> ok
[17:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: elixir-lang (bionic-backports/universe) [1.3.3-2 => 1.9.1.dfsg-1~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: erlang (bionic-backports/main) [1:20.2.2+dfsg-1ubuntu2 => 1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted elixir-lang [source] (bionic-backports) [1.9.1.dfsg-1~ubuntu18.04.1]
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rabbitmq-server [source] (bionic-backports) [3.8.2-0ubuntu1~ubuntu18.04.1]
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted erlang [source] (bionic-backports) [1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1]
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rabbitmq-server [source] (eoan-backports) [3.8.2-0ubuntu1~ubuntu19.10.1]
[17:38] <doko> rbalint: is the libc6-lse supposed to be in main?
[17:39] <vorlon> doko: it is and I asked him to follow up on seeding it
[17:39] <vorlon> doko: but maybe you see a good place to seed it, I didn't see an obvious precedent
[17:40] <doko> ok, I'll seed it
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xubuntu-default-settings [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.4]
[17:45] <doko> vorlon: you uploaded ubuntu-system-service last, which is ready for demotion. is this intended?
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: erlang [s390x] (bionic-backports/main) [1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[17:45] <vorlon> doko: see above discussion with seb128 (and I already demoted it)
[17:46] <doko> ahh, ok
[18:01] <rbalint> thanks doko!
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: erlang [ppc64el] (bionic-backports/main) [1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gui-ufw (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04.1-1 => 20.04.1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate)
[18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: erlang [amd64] (bionic-backports/main) [1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: erlang [i386] (bionic-backports/main) [1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: erlang [arm64] (bionic-backports/main) [1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[18:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: erlang [armhf] (bionic-backports/main) [1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted erlang [amd64] (bionic-backports) [1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1]
[19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted erlang [armhf] (bionic-backports) [1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1]
[19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted erlang [ppc64el] (bionic-backports) [1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1]
[19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted erlang [arm64] (bionic-backports) [1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1]
[19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted erlang [s390x] (bionic-backports) [1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1]
[19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted erlang [i386] (bionic-backports) [1:22.0.7+dfsg-1build1~ubuntu18.04.1]
[19:12] <bdmurray> bluesabre: xubuntu-default-settings has migrated and xubuntu images can be built
[19:21] <bluesabre> bdmurray: awesome, thanks!
[19:23] <bluesabre> bdmurray: how do I do that without rebuilding everybody?
[19:24] <bluesabre> I've never clicked the ominous "Request Rebuild" button before :)
[19:24] <bdmurray> let me have a look
[19:25] <bdmurray> bluesabre: its listed as re-building already so lets see what happens
[19:26] <bluesabre> bdmurray: great!
[19:26] <bdmurray> actually that might be the failed build from a couple of hours ago
[19:33] <mwhudson> morning
[19:33] <mwhudson> general on-fire-ness status?
[19:36] <bdmurray> its a slow burn initial images were created not too long ago
[19:36] <mwhudson> i suppose i should do some testing then
[19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qclib (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-0ubuntu1 => 2.1.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qclib [source] (focal-proposed) [2.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[19:45] <bdmurray> bluesabre: we are starting the builds for xubuntu
[19:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: git (focal-proposed/main) [1:2.25.1-1ubuntu2 => 1:2.25.1-1ubuntu3] (core, i386-whitelist)
[19:53] <cjwatson> bdmurray: Are there likely to be many other image builds happening tonight?  I'd like to do a Launchpad rollout tonight if I can manage it - it shouldn't actually disrupt anything, but wanted to check
[19:54] <bdmurray> cjwatson: No not likely given sil2100 and Laney have taken off for the night. The xubuntu one should be the last one.
[19:54] <cjwatson> OK
[19:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: horizon (focal-proposed/main) [3:18.2.1~git2020041013.754804667-0ubuntu2 => 3:18.2.1~git2020041013.754804667-0ubuntu3] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[20:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] (20200420.1) has been added
[20:03] <coreycb> hi release team, I uploaded a new version of horizon with a bug fix. I don't plan to do any more uploads this week for openstack fwiw.
[20:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lubuntu-meta (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04.7 => 20.04.8] (lubuntu)
[20:04] <The_LoudSpeaker> ^ this is to fix a previous revert
[20:17] <sforshee> vorlon: enabling dm-multipath works, I
[20:17] <sforshee> I'll get a new linux-kvm building
[20:28] <bdmurray> The_LoudSpeaker: Could you elaborate on what you mean by "fix a previous revert" and say something about the importance of this upload so the release team can evaluate including it?
[20:28] <The_LoudSpeaker> Yeah.
[20:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: remmina (focal-proposed/main) [1.4.2+dfsg-1ubuntu1 => 1.4.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[20:31] <The_LoudSpeaker> sooo @tsimonq2 reverted a commit here https://phab.lubuntu.me/rSEEDe6e116cc8eae962950b37fad88d686191bc274b5 to remove lubuntu-grub-theme which has a important bug right now.
[20:32] <The_LoudSpeaker> which lead to update of meta to 20.04.7
[20:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python2.7 (focal-proposed/universe) [2.7.18~rc1-2 => 2.7.18-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[20:33] <The_LoudSpeaker> But if you notice that xfonts-efont-unicode which is required for Lubuntu's xscreensaver theme also got removed
[20:33] <The_LoudSpeaker> 20.04.8 just adds xfonts-efont-unicode back
[20:33] <The_LoudSpeaker> coressponding to https://phab.lubuntu.me/rSEED3468321dfdf2f01d04172fc7c8812f7da352c47a
[20:34] <doko> ^^^please consider accepting python2.7, final release, no code changes
[20:34] <The_LoudSpeaker> ^^ bdmurray
[20:37] <The_LoudSpeaker> xfonts-efont-unicode is necessary as it is the font which we use in xscreensaver dialoguebox
[20:41] <bdmurray> got it thanks
[20:41] <sil2100> bdmurray: hey! You need help with the failed builds?
[20:41] <sil2100> I can clear those out so you can press the buttan
[20:42] <bdmurray> sil2100: vorlon built them
[20:42] <sil2100> Excellent
[20:42] <sil2100> \o/
[20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wine (focal-proposed/universe) [5.0-3 => 5.0-3ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wine [source] (focal-proposed) [5.0-3ubuntu1]
[21:14] <wgrant> Could someone look at ruby2.7 soonish? I think it would have been autoapproved under the new i386-whitelist ignore rule
[21:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-subtitles (focal-proposed/universe) [1.4.2-1 => 1.6-2.1] (cli-mono) (sync)
[21:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ogmrip (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-2build1 => 1.0.1-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[21:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ogmrip [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.0.1-3]
[22:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: googleplay-api (focal-proposed/universe) [0.4.4-1 => 0.4.4+git20200310-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: birdtray (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.0+ds-2 => 1.8.0+ds-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted birdtray [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.8.0+ds-1]
[22:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted googleplay-api [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.4.4+git20200310-2]
[22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-kvm (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1008.8 => 5.4.0-1009.9] (core, kernel) (sync)
[22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-kvm (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0.1008.8 => 5.4.0.1009.9] (core, kernel) (sync)