=== brainwash_ is now known as brainwash [03:01] bluesabre: So I ran the 'get-pot.sh' script, merged the translations with the msgmerge tool, then diff'd the translation percent: http://paste.openstack.org/show/8OpGNiuGJXRNBIHUuIat/ it's a bit painful. === jphilips_ is now known as jphilips [09:00] thunar taking up 1 cpu has happened to me twice in the last day :D [10:30] Unit193: so maybe we don't ship those translations yet, and install call for updates to them and get them out for 20.04.1? [10:30] s/install/instead [10:33] -BottyMcBotFace:#xubuntu-devel- ::platform:: Update supported kernel packages @ http://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/platform/commit/?id=c0e59184d807f50ec6f89d3800758691fda1b601 (by Dimitri John Ledkov) [17:00] -BottyMcBotFace:#xubuntu-devel- Reminder: Next meeting chair is Unit193 [18:49] https://gitlab.gnome.org/Community/Ubuntu/gtk-common-themes/-/commit/77468200d2e287ba041aed1e5c475f0958af4a5f :) [20:18] Heads up about an Xorg regression affecting multi-monitors a recent upgrade caused; might not be specific to Xubuntu but affecting 6 new Lenovo E495's here Bug #1873895 [20:18] bug 1873895 in xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu (Ubuntu) "Regression: block staircase display with side-by-side monitors" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1873895 [20:19] Thanks TJ- [20:19] bluesabre: struggling to figure out how to further track it down; any suggestions as to what to attack welcome! [20:21] TJ-: We updated xfwm4 recently, not sure if that could be related [20:22] bluesabre: let me review the package upgrade list! [20:23] ooo!! xfwm4:amd64 (4.14.0-2ubuntu1, 4.14.1-0ubuntu1) [20:24] so if we downgrade to 4.14.0-2ubuntu1 that would be a worthwhile test [20:27] Yes. I’d be curious about that. Somebody else mentioned the same issue, but their screenshot showed a completely normal desktop. [20:28] the gitlab issue points to https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16716 [20:28] bugzilla.xfce.org bug 16716 in General "don't use xpresent on AMD CARRIZO as it produces garbled screen" [Normal,New] [20:29] that's where we started! in my bug report I linked to the amdgpu 'driver' bug though [20:30] the bit didn't understand is the mention of xpresent vs glx, and "...switched back to glx" [20:31] 4.14.1 uses xpresent when an AMD gpu is detected [20:31] .0 used glx [20:31] aha! [20:32] thanks for the explanation. I'm not at the office but just realised I've a HDMI monitor and cable close to hand so I can test it now [20:33] https://git.xfce.org/xfce/xfwm4/commit/?id=23900123ad8418149897a094d1096d6ecb984d3c [20:42] It would help to test it still fails before downgrading! Didn't have the problem with the older package but just doing a full upgrade to test if it does fail here [20:44] it's a last minute change for sure [20:45] meaning that .1 was not tested much at all [20:46] well grrrr, cannot reproduce! [20:48] Got it!! [20:49] The eDP is 192x1080, the external monitor here (at home) is 1920x1200 and does not suffer [20:49] At the office the external monitor(s) are 1680x1050 and suffer. I just switched the resolution of this HDMI monitor to 1680x105 and reproduced [20:55] No AMD gpu to test things with. Will be my next hardware purchase. [20:58] If you can confirm, we can probably patch that back out after reporting upstream [20:58] Well, now we've got it where should I dig? I've updated the bug report with my observations about the resolution and my hypothesis as to WHY it occurs as it does; I need sleep but tomorrow we can have a crack at fixing it if I know which code to attack [20:59] I don't think xfwm4 is at fault here so instead of reverting there, let's attack the driver itself [20:59] bluesabre: which country are you in? [21:04] basically, looks like the driver is trying to render 1920 pixels to 1680 display - we can try to measure the block width tomorrow to confirm [21:08] I can work on it for now but if I get out of my depth I'm prepared to ship a loan E495 to one of you if you think you can get further [21:34] TJ-: US. I wouldn’t recommend shipping me anything currently, not sure if make reasonable progress. [21:35] bluesabre: OK ... I'm looking at the driver... a bisect might get us somewhere based on this: $ gitlog | grep present: | wc -l => 20 [21:37] I suspect a636f42b496b0604ca00a144690ece61d1a88a27 present: Check that flip and screen pixmap pitches match [21:50] looks like there's a series of incremental patches around flip/pitch in present that are suspect [22:00] Core installer crashes in both VMWare and Virtual Box. Had no problem installing the Desktop ISO. [22:03] Running the installer from the boot menu or the live desktop session? [22:06] Both. [22:07] Tried unchecking downloads and using safe graphics option, neither helped. Crash is always near the end of the install. [22:08] OK, the boot menu option is unfortunately common, but live session isn't. Did the installer complete, just crash at the end? Do you have logs of what happened? [22:15] No, never completed so I don't know if there's an install log. I'll try again and look. [22:16] That'd be the logs in /var/log/installer/ and /var/log/syslog (ubiquity pushes everything to there..) [22:22] I've noticed an apparent xf86-video-amdgpu 'pitch' problem in Xorg log. When using single output eDP 1920x1080 the log shows "=> pitch 7680 bytes" and 7680/4=1920. with ext monitor at 1920x1200 I see "=> pitch 15360 bytes" and 15360/4-1920=1920 BUT when ext monitor is at 1680x1050 I see " => pitch 14848 bytes" however 14848/4-1920=1792 NOT 1680 as would be expected [22:25] TJ-: I may have missed it, did you end up trying downgrading xfwm4? [22:26] Unit193: yes but that wasn't conclusive since I was testing with a 1920x1200 ext HDMI - didn't spot until later that the issue occurs with the 1680x1050 output [22:26] Unit193: with the downgrade I didn't observe the issue BUT didn't test with the HDMI at 1680 [22:46] Couldn't find anything useful in the logs so tried the installer from the desktop again in Virtual Box and this time it installed. This was a fresh image, last time I installed from the desktop after the crash took me there. If I can replicate the crash again I'll let you know. Thanks for your help! [22:47] xu-core-beta0tw: Hey, glad it seems to be working!