[12:59] <cpaelzer> hiho jamespage didrocks doko ddstreet joeubuntu sarnold
[12:59] <ddstreet> o/
[13:00] <cpaelzer> I guess in release week there isn't much going on and this can be fast
[13:00] <joeubuntu> good morning cpaelzer ddstreet !
[13:00] <cpaelzer> but lets check it out
[13:00] <cpaelzer> also I haven't had lunch yet so I want to be fast :-)
[13:00] <doko> hi
[13:00] <doko> should we skip?
[13:00] <sarnold> good morning cpaelzer, ddstreet, joeubuntu, doko :)
[13:00] <cpaelzer> lets do it but be quick, I don't expect much to come up
[13:00] <cpaelzer> #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status
[13:00] <meetingology> Meeting started Tue Apr 21 13:00:41 2020 UTC.  The chair is cpaelzer. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[13:00] <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick
[13:00] <cpaelzer> #topic Review of previous action items
[13:00] <cpaelzer> none open AFAIK
[13:01] <cpaelzer> #topic current component mismatches
[13:01] <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg
[13:01] <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg
[13:01] <cpaelzer> only known cases
[13:01] <cpaelzer> the mass seed which isn't urgent part of 20.04
[13:01] <cpaelzer> and the apport dependency which is the ordering of the deps
[13:01] <cpaelzer> no action needed on those, any disagreement?
[13:02] <sarnold> fine by me
[13:02] <cpaelzer> ok lets go on - anyone feel free to speak up if we go too fast
[13:02] <cpaelzer> #topic New MIRs
[13:02] <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
[13:02] <cpaelzer> one real candidate
[13:02] <cpaelzer> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/1871835
[13:02] <cpaelzer> and actually I don't think this even needs a review
[13:02] <cpaelzer> this is a kernel source like the many kernel sources built by the kernel team
[13:02] <cpaelzer> just another flavor of it
[13:03] <cpaelzer> doko: how did we add e.g. -azure and -gce abck in the day
[13:03] <cpaelzer> does this really need a review - or can we promote it right away?
[13:04] <cpaelzer> joeubuntu: sarnold: and from your POV - adding those would be a no-op right?
[13:05] <cpaelzer> you track kernels anyway I guess
[13:06] <joeubuntu> I don't see a problem, sarnold your thoughts ?
[13:06] <sarnold> cpaelzer: yeah, I'm not sure how the zoo of kernels works out
[13:06] <cpaelzer> doko: how was this handled in the past
[13:06] <cpaelzer> I'd prefere to just do it the same way
[13:06] <cpaelzer> which most likely means no new MIR process needed on this
[13:06] <sarnold> cpaelzer: the one funny thing with pi is that it seems to have binary blobs that may be less maintainable than more 'normal' machine kernels
[13:07] <cpaelzer> lets go through the rest of the agenda (all no-ops today I think) - we can wait for dokos answer in the last segment
[13:07] <cpaelzer> #topic Incomplete bugs / questions
[13:07] <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
[13:07] <sarnold> cpaelzer: but that seems more like a business decision, "is this platform important enough to pay the costs", and hope that our partners will be able to supply us with fixes in five, ten years
[13:08] <cpaelzer> nothing new in the incomplete
[13:08] <cpaelzer> so we can go for
[13:08] <cpaelzer> #topic Any other business?
[13:08] <cpaelzer> and here I'd ait for doko to chime in how this was handled in the past
[13:08] <cpaelzer> sarnold: I agree - this is a support statement more than anything else
[13:10] <sarnold> can we move this meeting ~two hours later? that'd help me quite a lot :) it's 0600 for me, and while joeubuntu has been kind enough to take my place, that's been inconvenient all around
[13:11] <doko> cpaelzer: no MIR required in the past, same as for the versioned source packages
[13:11] <cpaelzer> thank doko, can I assign it to you for promotion on thaose terms then?
[13:11] <cpaelzer> sarnold: 2h later I have other meeting conflicts, but 1h or 1.5h are fine
[13:12] <cpaelzer> sarnold: would you mind starting something like a doodle poll for new times?
[13:12] <doko> sure
[13:12] <sarnold> cpaelzer: good idea, thanks :)
[13:13] <didrocks> a pool sounds good to me. Most of the time, this meeting conflicts with some others for me (but 2 hours isn’t doable, so let’s see for a poll)
[13:13] <cpaelzer> ok, then we are don for today
[13:13] <cpaelzer> thanks everyone
[13:13] <cpaelzer> #endmeeting
[13:13] <meetingology> Meeting ended Tue Apr 21 13:13:43 2020 UTC.
[13:13] <meetingology> Minutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2020/ubuntu-meeting.2020-04-21-13.00.moin.txt
[13:13] <doko> that would move it into other meetings for me.
[13:13] <didrocks> thx
[13:14] <sarnold> thanks cpaelzer, all :)