[00:00] <vorlon> wgrant: zeromq3 unblocked
[00:01] <wgrant> Oh there's ceph as well, but that'll get a security update soon enough and the only rbuilddeps on riscv64 are boring (qemu/libvirt have it disabled), so much less interesting and slightly less obviously completely benign
[00:01] <wgrant> vorlon: Thanks!
[00:01]  * vorlon nods
[00:02] <mwhudson> ok well i'm going to go and be a parent for a bit, telegram me if you need anything
[00:03] <xnox> vorlon:  your picture is frozen in hangout
[00:03] <xnox> vorlon:  yet me and everyone else is animated
[00:04] <wgrant> I mean, you're never not animated.
[00:04] <vorlon> xnox: brian's camera is off, you don't have a baseline on this side of the ocean :)
[00:04] <vorlon> anyway, reconnected
[00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] has been updated (20200422.1)
[00:07] <Laney> do not get excited about that build!!!!!!!!!
[00:07] <Laney> it's just for us to test some stuff, a proper respin will be happening shortly along with all of the other flavours
[00:08] <vorlon> (marked it disabled on the iso tracker)
[00:08] <Laney> 👍
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] has been disabled
[00:18] <wgrant> What's the best way to force the remaining riscv64 builds stuck in -proposed because some of their binaries are uninstallable due to e.g. snapd and strace? kdeplasma-addons, libguestfs, nfs-ganesha, plasma-discover are the problematic sources.
[00:22] <tumbleweed> you mean force them to migrate?
[00:22] <wgrant> Yeah
[00:22] <vorlon> we could force the binaries in with hints
[00:22] <xnox> wgrant:  force hint & unblock hint in britney
[00:23] <vorlon> and leave them uninstallable in the release pocket
[00:23] <wgrant> That would seem to make sense, because most of the interesting binaries install just fine.
[00:23] <tumbleweed> isn't there a flag to tell britney to ignore the arch entirely?
[00:23] <tumbleweed> broken_archs or somethnig like that
[00:23] <vorlon> maybe but it doesn't work
[00:23] <xnox> tumbleweed:  we have all of them set now, and they still don't migrate
[00:24] <tumbleweed> ah I see yeah
[00:24] <vorlon> so a combination of force + force-hint
[00:24] <vorlon> is what actually does it
[00:24] <wgrant> Is there documentation on this somewhere, or should I go digging?
[00:27] <vorlon> eh
[00:27] <vorlon> I don't know, I'm going from 16-year-old memory
[00:43] <tumbleweed> dare I ask about g-animals?
[00:44] <vorlon> you can ask, but I still haven't heard confirmation of gelephant
[01:14] <bdmurray> wgrant: python-tornado failed to build on riscv64
[01:14] <wgrant> bah
[01:14] <bdmurray> looks like a timeout
[01:15] <kryten> vorlon: On behalf of the Lubuntu Artwork team, could you please deploy the updated CD Image assets from <https://git.launchpad.net/~lubuntu-art/+git/cdimage-css> to <http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/include/lubuntu/> ?
[01:15] <wgrant> Yeah, will retry, and in parallel manually confirm that it's close to the timeout
[01:25] <wgrant> vorlon: Thanks, those all migrated.
[01:45] <wgrant> bdmurray: The fact that it failed again in exactly the same way reminded me that I'd rebooted the VM host a few days ago, and I found that its CPU came back at a lower clock speed. I've fixed that, but will also upload some higher timeouts to a silo just in case.
[01:49] <wgrant> These really aren't the most reliable tests, are they, just got two weird timeouts on amd64.
[01:57] <wgrant>  Test that write() Futures are never orphaned. ... ok
[01:59] <wgrant> OK (skipped=46)
[02:00] <wgrant> bdmurray: Sorry about that, should be good now.
[02:00] <wgrant> Server power management defaults ftl
[02:13] <xnox> tumbleweed: gutsy 😀
[02:24] <bdmurray> wgrant: thanks
[02:28] <housecat> Howdy. Couple of quick questions from over in #ubuntu: 1) I'm guessing the plan this cycle is to enable bionic -> focal do-release-upgrade once 20.04.1 is out as normal? 2) Assuming the answer to (1) is yes, is the plan also to leave do-release-upgrade -d pointing at focal until that has happened?
[02:28] <housecat> istr that's how it worked for bionic, but somebody is loudly telling me i'm wrong so figured i should check :)
[02:30] <vorlon> kryten: done
[02:34] <bdmurray> housecat: you are correct
[02:35] <bdmurray> housecat: and somebody else is wrong
[02:35] <housecat> thanks. mind if i quote that?
[02:35] <bdmurray> well, maybe I should give you a better quote
[02:37] <bdmurray> housecat: you are absolutely correct and release upgrades from 18.04 LTS to 20.04 LTS will not be enabled until 20.04.1 and you are also correct that do-release-upgrade -d on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS will point to Ubuntu 20.04 LTS.
[02:38] <tumbleweed> xnox: :P
[02:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: requests (focal-proposed/main) [2.22.0-2build1 => 2.22.0-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[02:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted requests [source] (focal-proposed) [2.22.0-2ubuntu1]
[03:02] <kryten> vorlon: Thanks!
[03:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sphinx (focal-proposed/main) [1.8.5-7ubuntu2 => 1.8.5-7ubuntu3] (edubuntu, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[03:33] <mwhudson> xnox, tumbleweed: gusty gibbon
[03:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sphinx [source] (focal-proposed) [1.8.5-7ubuntu3]
[05:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-tx-tftp (focal-proposed/main) [0.1~bzr47-0ubuntu4 => 0.1~bzr47-0ubuntu5] (ubuntu-server)
[06:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-tx-tftp [source] (focal-proposed) [0.1~bzr47-0ubuntu5]
[06:24] <vorlon> respins still pending; the packages that I tried to get in quickly at the end have not gone so quick. :/
[07:11] <wgrant> vorlon: Anything others can help with? Looks like we're mostly just waiting on flaky autopkgtest retries?
[07:23] <vorlon> wgrant: mostly just waiting on the time it takes to iterate britney; I wasn't going to block on the retries in this context
[07:23] <wgrant> Ah
[07:24] <vorlon> but requests has gone through now, so most respins are unblocked
[07:28] <sil2100> vorlon: morning! I see twisted migrated to release but there are no server image respins - should I do that now?
[07:28] <sil2100> mwhudson: hey, how's the subiquity situation?
[07:29] <vorlon> sil2100: I just hit the button now
[07:29] <vorlon> sil2100: sorry - the python stuff took much longer to shake out than planned, so the respins are only happening now. and I still need to hit sphinx with a hammer before we can respin ubuntustudio
[07:33] <sil2100> vorlon: oh shit, sphinx was in the whole reverse-chain too? Did you poke Eickmeyer with a heads-up?
[07:33] <vorlon> and piuparts autopkgtest failed when triggered by sphinx because today is the release date and there is no updated distro-info-data with a new devel series name ;P
[07:33] <sil2100> ;p
[07:33] <vorlon> sil2100: Wimpress said he was taking care of notifying flavors that we would respin the world, I didn't specifically ping anyone
[07:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-tx-tftp (focal-proposed/main) [0.1~bzr47-0ubuntu5 => 0.1~bzr47-0ubuntu6] (ubuntu-server)
[07:38] <jibel> vorlon, I did on the telegram channel
[07:39] <vorlon> ... telegram channel
[07:40] <jibel> yeah, there is a channel bridge with #ubuntu-quality where the flavors are coordinating the testing.
[07:43] <vorlon> mmk
[07:43] <philroche> vorlon: sil2100: Are all packages, those that you are aware of anyway, made it in? If so I can start prepping cloud images. I won't release until I get a +1 of course
[07:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-wsgi-intercept (focal-proposed/universe) [1.9.2-0ubuntu1 => 1.9.2-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-wsgi-intercept [source] (focal-proposed) [1.9.2-0ubuntu2]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected vala [source] (focal-proposed) [0.48.4-0ubuntu1]
[07:45] <sil2100> vorlon: did you hear from mwhudson about any further fixes to the multipath pieces?
[07:45] <sil2100> Oh, I see there was a hotfix committed
[07:46] <vorlon> yeah
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-tx-tftp [source] (focal-proposed) [0.1~bzr47-0ubuntu6]
[07:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] has been updated (20200423)
[07:51] <sil2100> philroche: I think yes
[07:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] has been updated (20200423)
[07:52] <philroche> sil2100: ack
[07:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Focal Final] has been updated (20200423)
[07:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Focal Final] has been updated (20200423)
[07:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Focal Final] has been updated (20200423)
[07:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Focal Final] has been updated (20200423)
[07:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Focal Final] has been updated (20200423)
[07:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] has been updated (20200423)
[07:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Focal Final] has been updated (20200423)
[07:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Focal Final] has been updated (20200423)
[07:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server ppc64el [Focal Final] has been updated (20200423)
[07:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server s390x [Focal Final] has been updated (20200423)
[07:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-wsgi-intercept (focal-proposed/universe) [1.9.2-0ubuntu2 => 1.9.2-0ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[07:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Focal Final] has been updated (20200423)
[07:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Focal Final] has been updated (20200423)
[07:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-wsgi-intercept [source] (focal-proposed) [1.9.2-0ubuntu3]
[07:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vala (focal-proposed/universe) [0.48.3-1 => 0.48.5-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[08:00] <mwhudson> sil2100: yes, subiquity is now 100% bug free!!!
[08:00] <sil2100> mwhudson: SWEET!
[08:01] <sil2100> It wasn't that hard, see?
[08:02] <sil2100> We now need to do the same for everything in Ubuntu
[08:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] has been updated (20200423)
[08:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] has been updated (20200423)
[08:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] has been updated (20200423)
[08:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] has been updated (20200423)
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Focal Final] has been updated (20200423)
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Focal Final] has been updated (20200423)
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Focal Final] has been updated (20200423)
[08:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Focal Final] (20200423) has been added
[08:09] <Laney> guess I came on at the right time eh
[08:11] <sumagna> why?
[08:11] <didrocks> sumagna: images just published for testing ^
[08:11] <sumagna> oh ok
[08:11] <tsimonq2> He was waiting for the testing giraffes to start smoke testing the fresh ISOs.
[08:14] <vorlon> sil2100: do you recall if cron.source requires any options in order to DTRT?
[08:16] <Laney> vorlon: no
[08:17] <paride> \o/
[08:19] <Laney> vorlon: take it you're taking that item then?
[08:20] <vorlon> Laney: yah it's running
[08:20] <Laney> great
[08:20] <vorlon> (before I asked, because we could always cancel/ throw away)
[08:20] <Laney> I'll mark it as in progress on the doc
[08:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Focal Final] has been disabled
[08:22] <vorlon> ^^ that's because it needs sphinx.  documented it in the discourse, and hopefully sphinx will clear in the next p-m run
[08:23] <vorlon> but it's 0130 here so I think I'm going to have to leave the rest to Europe
[08:27] <vorlon> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/testing-ports/focal_probs.html looks... sorta wrong
[08:27] <vorlon> apparently does not understand versioned provides, hmph
[08:29] <vorlon> someone might want to poke at https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/priority-mismatches a bit; I've done the promotions, but I haven't checked whether the demotions are sane/safe
[08:41] <vorlon> and someone please finish cleaning up https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/nbs.html once sphinx migrates
[09:07] <vorlon> sphinx has migrated, so someone can respin ubuntustudio in a few
[09:13] <sil2100> vorlon: will do, thanks! ;)
[09:14] <sil2100> Yeah, saw it migrating, will wait a few more minutes, manually anonftpsync and build
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (focal-proposed/main) [1:6.4.2-0ubuntu3 => 1:6.4.3-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[09:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Focal Final] has been updated (20200422)
[09:31] <philroche> sil2100: python3-requests:amd64  2.22.0-2ubuntu1 would trigger a new cloud image build. Current 20200423 cloud image has 2.22.0-2build1. From changelog I see the  2.22.0-2ubuntu1 change was to drop python2 support - cherry picked from Debian.  Is that change worthy of a full rebuild?
[09:33] <sil2100> philroche: it was just dropping python2 support - so as long as we don't need to have a sync between 'release pocket' and 'cloud image contents', I don't think it needs that
[09:33] <philroche> sil2100: ack. Thanks
[09:35] <LocutusOfBorg> today is the day piuparts autopkgtests start failing... distro_info.DistroDataOutdated: Distribution data outdated. Please check for an update for distro-info-data. See /usr/share/doc/distro-info-data/README.Debian for details.
[09:35] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, ^^ hint?
[09:41] <tsimonq2> LocutusOfBorg: See above, he acked the failure/probably left to Europe people.
[09:43] <Laney> I've just applied the block-all source and turned off the auto-accept bot
[09:44] <Laney> so no more migrations, no more accepts
[09:44] <sil2100> I re-kicked the source iso builds
[09:49] <LocutusOfBorg> lol ack
[09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Focal Final] has been updated (20200423)
[10:00] <Eickmeyer> sil2100, vorlon: I'm awake. Does somebody want to fill me in on what's happening with Studio?
[10:00] <sil2100> Eickmeyer: yes! It is rebuilt now o/
[10:00] <Eickmeyer> Perfect. I'll smoke test.
[10:01] <Eickmeyer> Just to make sure it's known, we ARE participating as LTS this time around. :)
[10:01] <sil2100> Eickmeyer: so we had to sadly respin everything because of some python2 removals - basically no real changes (just removing python2 versions from source packages), but still best to sanity check
[10:01] <Eickmeyer> sil2100: ack.
[10:18] <yfsdffasdff> w-h-e-n?
[10:18] <tsimonq2> yfsdffasdff: You just delayed it by an hour.
[10:19] <yfsdffasdff> oh nooooo
[10:19] <yfsdffasdff> shame on me
[10:19] <sumagna> what?!?
[10:23] <cjwatson> So can y'all not make us have to moderate this channel?
[10:23] <cjwatson> This isn't #ubuntu-release-party or whatever, it's a working channel
[10:32] <jfh> hi, I just noticed that there is a new daily-live image in pending with time-stamp April 23rd, but the s390x image is unusually small - just 366051328 instead of 685703168 (April 20th) - I wondered if something went wrong ?! (will give it a try anyway ...) -- http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily-live/pending/
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Focal Final] has been marked as ready
[10:36] <jfh> like assumed it's broken and doesn't boot up ...
[10:36] <Laney> jfh: paride noticed that
[10:36] <Laney> and xnox is about to check!
[10:37] <Eickmeyer> People are griping in my main channal about no SSL for the download. >.<
[10:37] <jfh> Laney: ok - didn't saw that ...
[10:37] <Laney> yeah sorry, it was a discussion on a hangout
[10:37] <paride> jfh, but thanks for spotting the difference in size
[10:38] <paride> that clearly indicates that something went wrong. Whan I did notice is that the image doesn't boot
[10:39] <jfh> paride: yeah - the download was "way to fast" ...
[10:46] <Laney> We're respinning server-live for s390x only
[10:46] <Laney> there was a failure to download the squashfs ...
[10:48] <jfh> ok
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Focal Final] has been updated (20200423.1)
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] has been marked as ready
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] has been marked as ready
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] has been marked as ready
[11:16] <xnox> Laney:  vorlon: should mongodb be ripped out of release pocket, into updates? or we will do that later elsehow?
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] has been marked as ready
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pycurl (focal-proposed/main) [7.43.0.2-1ubuntu5 => 7.43.0.2-1ubuntu6] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-5.0 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1035.36] (kernel)
[11:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-5.0 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1035.36]
[11:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] has been marked as ready
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] has been marked as ready
[11:56] <philroche> sil2100: Cloud images 20200423 are ready to go. Awaiting +1
[11:56] <sil2100> philroche: awesome, thanks!
[11:56] <sil2100> We'll give you a sign ;)
[11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: weechat-scripts (focal-proposed/universe) [20191009-1 => 20200421-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[11:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Focal Final] has been marked as ready
[12:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Focal Final] has been marked as ready
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Focal Final] has been marked as ready
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Focal Final] has been marked as ready
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Focal Final] has been marked as ready
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Focal Final] has been marked as ready
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Focal Final] has been marked as ready
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server ppc64el [Focal Final] has been marked as ready
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server s390x [Focal Final] has been marked as ready
[12:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: sugar (focal-proposed/primary) [0.117-2~build1]
[12:15] <jbicha> If y'all have time, please review the Sugar packages in the focal NEW queue. They were only removed this cycle because of py2 but that's been fixed
[12:16] <jbicha> also gnome-shell-extension-dashtodock (just GNOME 3.36, not py2)
[12:22] <jbicha> reverse-depends -r focal -b python-sphinx 😢
[12:22] <jbicha> some of those python-sphinx packages are Ubuntu Server stuff
[12:24] <jbicha> https://paste.debian.net/1142507/
[12:26] <doko> apw, sforshee: can the 5.6.0-1007-oem packages be demoted? https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.txt
[12:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Focal Final] has been marked as ready
[12:44] <apw> doko, are they not NBS in fact?
[12:45] <doko> apw: nothing in https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/nbs.html
[12:53] <xnox> doko:  no
[12:53] <xnox> doko:  1007 is in release pocket, 1008 is in proposed
[12:53] <xnox> doko:  both need to be in main
[12:53] <xnox> doko:  -proposed is too pre-emptive about this.
[12:54] <xnox> both are buildable, and will be published
[12:54] <xnox> 1008 will go into -updates when ready
[13:03] <apw> xnox, ahhh it is just lying, i love reports hwihc do that
[13:17] <wings> hey, for everyone working on getting 20.04 out the door
[13:17] <wings> thank you
[13:23] <xnox> doko:  apw: linux-oem is documented in https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/focal-fossa-20-04-lts-final-release-status-tracking/15366
[13:23] <xnox> btw, and has been there all week? or something.
[13:23] <xnox> doko:  apw: but yeah, something is broken in the -proposed report.
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (focal-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu1 => 0.99-0ubuntu2] (core)
[13:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (focal-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu2]
[13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Focal Final] has been marked as ready
[13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Focal Final] has been marked as ready
[13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Focal Final] has been marked as ready
[13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Focal Final] has been marked as ready
[14:21] <seb128> shrug, I tested the wrong iso ... any reason http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current still points to yesterday's image?
[14:29] <sil2100> philroche: ok, we're basically releasing now, so please proceed with the cloud images!
[14:29] <philroche> sil2100: ack
[14:33] <xnox> seb128:  because pending -> current promotion for devel series is broken on release days =)
[14:34] <seb128> xnox, :(
[15:07] <seb128> xnox, it case it was not clear before, that would be nice to fix if that's a thing known to be broken... what's the right place to report it? if the promotion stops working at some point maybe then just symlink current to proposed during the freeze?
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Focal Final] has been updated (20200423.1)
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Focal Final] has been updated (20200423.1)
[15:30] <xnox> seb128:  for milestone testing one must never go to cdimage
[15:30] <xnox> seb128:  one must always use the qa iso tracker, and use download urls listed there
[15:30] <xnox> seb128:  and one can submit pending / successful test results
[15:30] <xnox> seb128:  see http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/412/builds
[15:31] <xnox> seb128:  because publication (publish-image-set from ubuntu-archive-tools) is driven by build-ids listed and marked as ready in the qa tracker with manual tests passing.
[15:31] <xnox> seb128:  this is the only way we can publish mixed-build-id images on per-product basis
[15:32] <seb128> xnox, one must vs real world right?
[15:32] <seb128> but feel free to ignore the feedback, izfine
[15:32] <seb128> keep that 'current' pointing to the wrong thing if you think it's best this way
[15:33] <xnox> seb128:  all of our flavour leads, and everyone from discourse, is told to use the qa tracker
[15:33] <xnox> seb128:  and they do, and submit release critical bugs via qa tracker
[15:33] <seb128> that's not what I'm telling you
[15:33] <seb128> shrug
[15:33] <xnox> seb128:  please participate in milestone on discourse
[15:33] <seb128> I've been participating and using the QA tracker thanks
[15:33] <xnox> seb128:  i think you are the only person who used current image this week.....
[15:33] <seb128> I found something wrong which is confusing some people
[15:33] <xnox> who was confused?
[15:34] <xnox> bug #?
[15:34] <seb128> right, the only person in the world
[15:34] <bdmurray> hold on y'all
[15:34] <bdmurray> seb128: How did you get to the current image?
[15:34] <seb128> bdmurray, http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/ , the current entry was outdated when I posted my message
[15:34] <seb128> it has been fixed now
[15:34] <seb128> thanks to whoever did it
[15:35] <xnox> no it hasn't been fixed, it's done automatically and driven by jenkins
[15:35] <xnox> current image is never the latest spin we are testing
[15:35] <seb128> well, jenkins maybe fixed it
[15:35] <xnox> they are always published in pending
[15:35] <seb128> but it has been fixed
[15:35] <seb128> it's correct now
[15:35] <xnox> if you want the latest build we popped out you should look at pending only
[15:36] <seb128> thx, I know all that
[15:36] <xnox> seb128:  current != pending if jenkins didn't finish, or failed.
[15:36] <seb128> right, I got failed job emails
[15:36] <seb128> which is a flaky job
[15:36] <seb128> but at this point I don't think it makes sense to keep it outdated
[15:36] <seb128> we regularly force copy to current
[15:36] <xnox> !!!!!!
[15:38] <seb128> anyway, thanks for turning simple remarks into endless arguments, always an useful use of our time to all
[15:46] <sil2100> philroche: are you good from the cloud POV?
[16:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spice (focal-updates/main) [0.14.2-4ubuntu3 => 0.14.2-4ubuntu3] (ubuntu-server) (sync)
[16:03] <gaughen> Happy Release Day all!
[16:04] <xnox> =)
[16:05] <Laney> 🌈
[16:05] <Laney> hey gaughen
[16:05] <sil2100> \o/
[16:05] <philroche> sil2100: We are good. Discourse updated too https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/focal-fossa-20-04-lts-final-release-status-tracking/15366
[16:05] <philroche> gaughen: \o
[16:06] <sil2100> 🦄
[16:10] <waveform> o/ gaughen
[16:11] <mclemenceau> o/ gaughen
[16:13] <vorlon> xnox: mongodb out of release pocket> I don't see a reason for this.  It has currently unsatisfiable build-deps but it's in universe and there are no python2-specific binary packages built so that looks fixable in update as needed
[16:15] <xnox> ack
[16:19] <xnox> vorlon:  To join the video meeting, click this link: https://meet.google.com/ndx-sffh-tab
[16:19] <xnox> Otherwise, to join by phone, dial +44 20 3956 0723 and enter this PIN: 545 259 244#
[16:19] <xnox> To view more phone numbers, click this link: https://tel.meet/ndx-sffh-tab?hs=5
[16:23] <bryce> gaughen, :-)
[16:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spice [sync] (focal-updates) [0.14.2-4ubuntu3]
[16:53] <vorlon> List of old libraries in testing (0):
[16:53] <vorlon> yay
[17:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Focal Final] has been marked as ready
[17:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Focal Final] has been marked as ready
[17:29] <sil2100> \o/
[17:30] <slyon> yay!
[17:46] <waveform> woohoo!
[17:47] <dannf> \o/
[17:49] <cwayne> Whee
[17:50] <ogra> 'grats !
[17:50] <sil2100> We're ouut!
[17:50] <philroche> \o Nice work all
[17:50] <rbalint> o/
[17:50] <rbalint> thanks everyone!
[17:52] <Odd_Bloke> Great job, folks!
[17:53] <tyhicks> congrats! :)
[17:55] <sarnold> woo! congratulations :D
[17:56] <willcooke> Congrats all! \o/
[17:56] <Eickmeyer> YAY!
[17:57] <Eickmeyer> Release team! Great job! BTW, heads up: Ubuntu Studio is switching away from Xfce to KDE Plasma next release.
[17:57] <mdeslaur> congrats everyone! :)
[17:58] <mapreri> \o/
[18:00] <gaughen> fantastic work you all! <3
[18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.9 => 1:20.04.10] (core)
[18:05] <sil2100> gaughen: thank you!
[18:05] <sil2100> Eickmeyer: thanks o/
[18:05] <sil2100> willcooke: oh oh Will! Thanks \o/
[18:08] <ogra> there seems to be a bad redirect on the ubuntu.com website when using the download button
[18:09] <ogra> The requested URL /repos/Ubuntu/releases/20.04/ubuntu-20.04-live-server-amd64.iso was not found on this server.
[18:09] <ogra> so a 404
[18:09] <ogra> seems it redirects to https://reflector.westga.edu/repos/Ubuntu/releases/20.04/ubuntu-20.04-live-server-amd64.iso
[18:10] <ogra> (this is when using either download button on https://ubuntu.com/#download )
[18:18] <powersj> that mirror does seem to have updated maybe? https://reflector.westga.edu/repos/Ubuntu/releases/20.04/
[18:20] <ogra> ah, yeah, the isos are beta
[18:22] <vorlon> rafaeldtinoco: ah so you now have the mp targeted to the right place but it has the wrong base :)
[18:40] <fcanela_> As user, thank you all for your great work. I really appreciate it.
[18:41] <rafaeldtinoco> vorlon: =(
[18:41] <rafaeldtinoco> let me redo it
[18:42] <rafaeldtinoco> its about time for me to make this right
[18:42] <rafaeldtinoco> =)
[18:43] <rafaeldtinoco> https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-sru/britney/hints-ubuntu-bionic/revision/3173
[18:43] <vorlon> rafaeldtinoco: I went ahead and landed it manually :)
[18:43] <rafaeldtinoco> ok you already did
[18:44] <rafaeldtinoco> vorlon: i thought it was just proposing to that first target and that was it
[18:44] <rafaeldtinoco> i see now there are multiple targets for the srus
[18:44] <rafaeldtinoco> thanks anyway, sorry for the burden
[19:30] <Kamilion> just curious if xen's going to get a point release upgrade to move to python3?
[19:42] <vorlon> that is not likely to be sru material
[19:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: 36 entries have been added, updated or disabled
[20:08] <mwhudson> congrats to all :)
[20:26] <pizzaiolo> congrats team!!!! \o/
[20:46] <valorie> what a great release
[20:47] <valorie> thank you all, release team
[20:47] <valorie> if I ever meet any of you in person, you get the best gin made
[21:07] <Kamilion> so i'm stuck with python2 and xen 4.11 for another two and a half years?
[21:16] <Kamilion> meh. Guess i'll have some ppas to play with.
[21:50] <valorie> Kamilion: there was quite a bit of discussion about 0 day updates so don't lose hope
[21:50]  * valorie always enables backports
[21:51] <sarnold> valorie: I dunno, xen is a big beast. I have trouble seeing someone packaging up a version that uses py3 instead of py2 for -backports
[21:52] <valorie> aha
[21:52] <valorie> someone might do a PPA for it and get some testing then
[21:54] <Kamilion> not expecting 0-day -- just seeing 4.13 at the first or second point release *(20.04.1 / 20.04.2)
[21:55] <Kamilion> as far as i can tell, all the other requirements are in place; just nobody had time to spend looking after bringing 4.13 over from debian I guess
[21:56] <Kamilion> we've already shipped multiple versioned copies of xen in previous LTSs
[22:08] <powersj> Kamilion, I don't see 4.13 in debian
[22:08] <powersj> https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/xen
[22:17]  * Kamilion scratches head -- i could have sworn i saw a bunch of mailing list traffic about it
[22:17] <Kamilion> ah well, i must be misremembering or confused
[22:18]  * Kamilion double checks that it was xen 4.13 that brought py3 support
[22:39] <jbicha> please review the desktop-file-utils SRU for focal. It's an important issue that early adopters are complaining about
[23:05] <valorie> Kamilion: if you help Debian you help Ubuntu
[23:06] <Ukikie> ...In other words, if you clutter Debian with packages, you do so in Ubuntu (most of the time) too!
[23:08] <valorie> Ukikie: lol
[23:09] <sarnold> Ukikie: lol
[23:16] <xnox> Then Debian goes through autoremovals and Ubuntu is stuck with them forever
[23:17] <xnox> We were cleaning up today NBS & Uninstallable packages that we can't install nor rebuild. Thanks to all the py2 removals in Debian.
[23:17] <xnox> Well done Debian. But was painful for us, given we cut the release today.
[23:20] <sarnold> we'll get them back though, we'll get a head start on removing py3 packages, and that'll show em
[23:24] <Ukikie> I do actually have a package I'm a little concerned about in Ubuntu, in Debian it's not as concerning as I can pop it into backports.  It's somewhat along the lines of youtube-dl, which would be great to backport too. :3
[23:30] <valorie> xnox: thank you for your work
[23:30] <xnox> Thanks
[23:43] <vorlon> xnox: autoremovals from unstable are processed.  lazy Debian removals from testing but not unstable are the problem
[23:43] <vorlon> and https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/rcbuggy-problem-packages.html could be improved
[23:43] <vorlon> (it misses various classes of why a package is problematic to still be in Ubuntu when it's removed from testing)
[23:45] <Kamilion> i'm just happy 'python-is-python3' works for me in almost every case so far.
[23:45] <Kamilion> i know it won't work with C extensions, but that's okay
[23:46] <Kamilion> leaving it up to the site admin: good++
[23:51] <xnox> Kamilion: ❤️