=== pieq-afk is now known as pieq | ||
rbasak | I'm making plans to "reimport" all the git-ubuntu branches with their final versions. On qastaging it looks like if I force push all branches, existing MPs will remain. Is this correct? | 10:01 |
---|---|---|
rbasak | Only my test MP seems to be having its preview diff regenerated, which is confusing. | 10:02 |
rbasak | I also got OOPS-82e235e545a60a1f77a42487a22e9aa8 on my first push attempt | 10:02 |
ubot5 | https://oops.canonical.com/?oopsid=OOPS-82e235e545a60a1f77a42487a22e9aa8 | 10:02 |
rbasak | (the first attempt to force push master to change it under the MP, that is) | 10:02 |
cjwatson | rbasak: They'll remain though the "conversation" may be a bit confusing on each | 10:03 |
cjwatson | The oops is a timeout because qastaging runs on potatoes | 10:03 |
cjwatson | Seven seconds to select from FeatureFlag, seriously | 10:03 |
rbasak | That sounds good enough to me. Thanks! | 10:04 |
rbasak | Oh, one further question. I want to split ~usd-import-team apart, since right now we're conflating the team that maintains the git-ubuntu code base with the team (really just one bot) that maintains the imported branches themselves. | 10:05 |
rbasak | I think the easiest way to do this would be to create a new team for the bot. But then the branches need to move across. | 10:05 |
rbasak | I was going to do that at the same time as the reimport. | 10:05 |
rbasak | If I make sure that the default repository for each distribution source package target points to the ~usd-import-team repos, then when I push to the new team, tree objects should be shared with the old ones, so shouldn't cause double storage issues, right? | 10:06 |
rbasak | So I was going to make sure the pointers are all correctly pointing to the old repos, then as I import each replacement, push it to the new team and switch the default repository. | 10:07 |
rbasak | Will this work for you? | 10:07 |
cjwatson | Um | 10:13 |
cjwatson | Why not just change the owner of the existing repos? | 10:13 |
rbasak | Oh. I can I do that? | 10:14 |
rbasak | I can do that? | 10:14 |
rbasak | owner_link (writeable) | 10:15 |
rbasak | So I can | 10:15 |
rbasak | Thanks | 10:15 |
cjwatson | Clients won't notice unless they've explicitly cloned lp:~usd-import-team/ubuntu/+source/foo/+git/bar rather than lp:ubuntu/+source/foo. But that doesn't seem very likely and is easily fixed on the client end anyway. | 10:20 |
rbasak | As it happens, they have, because that's what "git ubuntu clone" does, because it predates us taking the prime spot. But I will change that very soon. | 10:27 |
rbasak | Another minor issue is that the importer bot itself doesn't have permission to change the default repository, so that's done from a separate script that we only run infrequently. So new repositories won't appear until that's done. | 10:28 |
rbasak | "appear" | 10:28 |
xnox | when doing binary package copy, can i choose architectures to copy? | 14:36 |
xnox | cause i think at the moment i will try to do binary copy & then remove binaries I do not want. | 14:36 |
cjwatson | You cannot | 14:39 |
cjwatson | IIRC anyway | 14:39 |
xnox | thanks | 14:45 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!