[00:20] <iconoclasthero> seveas:  If LD_LIBRARY_PATH was messed with, it wasn't by me.
[00:21] <iconoclasthero> i don't mess with environmental variables.
[00:22] <iconoclasthero> $ echo "$LD_LIBRARY_PATH"
[00:22] <iconoclasthero> $
[00:33] <iconoclasthero> also, i just realized that the error i happened to past was git, but this is also happening with apt:
[00:34] <iconoclasthero> /usr/lib/apt/methods/http: /usr/local/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libffi.so.7: no version information available (required by /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libp11-kit.so.0)
[00:35] <iconoclasthero> and that error repeats 12 times.
[02:22] <lestac> hey! hello
[02:23] <lestac> download is available?
[02:23] <dax> !isitout
[03:26] <Guma> Looks like redhat is also effected by this issue i reported here yesterday
[03:26] <Guma> v
[03:27] <Guma> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822831
[03:29] <Guma> would it be possible for 20.04 point release include this fix?
[03:29] <Guma> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11483367/
[15:37] <housecat> !info sgt-puzzles
[15:38] <housecat> i should probably wait for the archive to open before i poke about that huh
[15:50] <saxin> :D
[15:55] <saxin> nice name for next version \o/
[18:01] <jatt> mounting cifs partitions started to fail after a focal upgrade this week, the error log says:
[18:01] <jatt> [ 1026.700518] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -2
[18:01] <jatt> is this a known problem?
[18:01] <lotuspsychje> jatt: 20.04 support in #ubuntu now
[18:01] <jatt> hm ok thanks
[20:14] <kinghat> is there a spin that I can install to a 2gb drive?
[20:17] <Guma> I was wondering. Ii I update from RC to today latest will I be exact as released gold?