| === pieq-afk is now known as pieq | ||
| ricotz | hello, please get libreoffice accepted - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text= | 07:05 |
|---|---|---|
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pulseaudio [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:11.1-1ubuntu7.6] | 07:10 | |
| === Guest10938 is now known as slyon | ||
| cpaelzer | sil2100: hi, do you remember when we said spice can be a zero day SRU past the release? | 07:19 |
| cpaelzer | sil2100: I don't know what happened exactly but its state is odd (at least to me) | 07:19 |
| cpaelzer | I got the "it got released" mail yesterday and thought things are done | 07:20 |
| cpaelzer | and also I see | 07:20 |
| cpaelzer | spice | 0.14.2-4ubuntu3 | focal-updates | source | 07:20 |
| cpaelzer | so far so good | 07:20 |
| cpaelzer | but just now I got a mail about it being accepted to proposed | 07:20 |
| cpaelzer | there must be something wrong in between release/SRU of this package | 07:20 |
| cpaelzer | could you (or another archive/sru person) take a look and tell me if any action on my side is needed? | 07:21 |
| cpaelzer | Laney: you released the package, let me know if there was anything special about it? | 07:23 |
| sil2100 | cpaelzer: I think everything looks fine here | 07:26 |
| cpaelzer | ok, I was just wondering about the order the mails arrived | 07:27 |
| cpaelzer | and would have assumed that it will be removed from -proposed | 07:27 |
| cpaelzer | when being released | 07:27 |
| sil2100 | cpaelzer: so I see the package in both -updates and -proposed right now, with the -proposed one being published earlier than -updates, as expected | 07:27 |
| cpaelzer | really | 07:27 |
| cpaelzer | ok then it is just mail-ordering | 07:27 |
| sil2100 | ah, no, once a series gets stable, the -proposed removal is manual | 07:27 |
| cpaelzer | thanks for checking sil2100 | 07:27 |
| sil2100 | Like we clean out the -proposed packages after accepting SRUs manually ;) | 07:27 |
| marcustomlinson | tjaalton: could I ask for a review on the update-manager SRU for focal. It's a very small change for a rather large impact | 08:49 |
| tjaalton | marcustomlinson: sure | 08:51 |
| marcustomlinson | thanks! | 08:51 |
| === TheMaverick is now known as xMaverick | ||
| tjaalton | huh, sru-review it's saying I'm not authorized to accept it | 09:50 |
| tjaalton | maybe lp login expired, but shouldn't it refresh it? | 09:50 |
| Laney | I think we didn't give ubuntu-sru the right access yet | 09:53 |
| Laney | step 15 on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NewReleaseCycleProcess - who can do that? | 09:54 |
| tjaalton | ahah | 09:55 |
| tjaalton | apw: ^ can you help? | 09:56 |
| tjaalton | or sil2100 maybe.. | 09:56 |
| Laney | it's "launchpad.Edit" | 09:57 |
| Laney | nto sure if that is ~ubuntu-drivers or an actual Launchpad admin | 09:57 |
| tjaalton | wgrant then? :) | 09:57 |
| wgrant | Not me. | 09:58 |
| wgrant | Probably archive owner | 09:58 |
| wgrant | But I forget and am afk | 09:58 |
| tjaalton | sure, no worries | 09:59 |
| Laney | Someone in ~ubuntu-archive might as well try | 09:59 |
| doko | Laney: why start again with the wiki page when we have the google doc? | 10:02 |
| Laney | because linking a private document in a public channel is quite unfriendly | 10:03 |
| doko | then make it public? sil2100? | 10:03 |
| Laney | The wiki pages are still canonical | 10:03 |
| Laney | sorry this is an argument I'm not really up for having | 10:03 |
| cjwatson | Laney: ~techboard | 10:06 |
| cjwatson | For primary archives, launchpad.Edit needs the distribution owner | 10:06 |
| Laney | OK, I'm not always sure how to map launchpad.Edit to a team, thanks | 10:07 |
| cjwatson | (Or in general ~admins, i.e. IS, can nearly always do stuff) | 10:07 |
| cjwatson | lp.security (or occasionally lp.<app>.security) defines those rules | 10:07 |
| Laney | mdeslaur: stgraber: ^- maybe one of you could help out with that step please so we can start processing SRUs for focal? | 10:10 |
| Laney | possibly that should be split in two and moved from NewReleaseCycleProcess to ReleaseProcess | 10:11 |
| Laney | although ideally we would clear out PREVIOUS-proposed before, I guess ... | 10:11 |
| rbasak | Laney: FWIW, Focal Unapproved has now appeared at https://trello.com/b/XgBxtrZ9/sru (another board driving by the same script). | 10:13 |
| rbasak | driven by | 10:13 |
| Laney | tjaalton: (In the meantime you could proxy your accepts through someone in ~ubuntu-archive) | 10:15 |
| Laney | rbasak: Nice one | 10:15 |
| Laney | I think the situation will probably be a little bit confusing for the SRU team until we've cleared the syncs out, at least | 10:15 |
| rbasak | Of course :) | 10:16 |
| rbasak | I didn't really expect to touch anything until the release team says so | 10:16 |
| Laney | There's a slightly elevated risk given that focal-proposed is still full of junk, but if you're careful enough I think you can do some SRU processing for higher-priority issues | 10:17 |
| tjaalton | only 15 packages | 10:24 |
| ricotz | please accept libreoffice https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1874285 | 10:25 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1874285 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal) " [SRU] libreoffice 6.4.3 for focal" [High,In progress] | 10:25 |
| ricotz | it will also take care of an upgrade issue from bionic | 10:26 |
| Laney | tjaalton: actually I think I can still accept things into proposed if you want to give me a sign | 10:40 |
| tjaalton | Laney: update-manager is fine | 11:00 |
| mdeslaur | Laney: so, step 15 from the wiki? | 11:09 |
| mdeslaur | Laney: done. | 11:16 |
| tjaalton | mdeslaur: thanks, works :) | 11:17 |
| mdeslaur | cool :) | 11:17 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.10] | 11:17 | |
| Laney | mdeslaur: thanks! | 11:21 |
| mdeslaur | yw! | 11:23 |
| xnox | popey: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/groovy-gorilla-release-schedule/15531 is "locked" with ACLs right? I think we are ok with comments, but people may not edit it. Similar to how the Release Tracking document was. | 14:50 |
| popey | Ya, the release category is "see" for everyone and "create / reply / see" for the release-team. Perhaps I should add "Canonical" as create/reply/see too? | 14:56 |
| popey | which seems reasonable | 14:57 |
| Laney | if it's possible to sync groups on Discourse with Launchpad groups I'd probably be OK with letting ~ubuntu-dev have edit rights there | 15:00 |
| popey | I do not think it can do that, might be a question for IS | 15:04 |
| * tumbleweed does the distro-info-data dance | 15:14 | |
| Laney | ah | 15:22 |
| Laney | sil2100: ^^^^ | 15:22 |
| Laney | don't you two collide | 15:22 |
| tumbleweed | if someone else is going to, I'll happily do dayjob work instead :) | 15:28 |
| tumbleweed | but I need to get the Debian side done, at least | 15:28 |
| Laney | It's probably OK, I just didn't want you two to duplicate each others work | 15:28 |
| sil2100 | tumbleweed: if you want then feel free! | 15:32 |
| sil2100 | I'll do debootstrap then | 15:33 |
| sil2100 | tumbleweed: will you do the SRUs also? I can then review those | 15:33 |
| cjwatson | FWIW I committed the debootstrap change to Debian, though haven't particularly bothered to upload | 15:34 |
| cjwatson | we have an Ubuntu delta anyway so doesn't hurt to upload that | 15:34 |
| tumbleweed | People at work reporting upgrades to fossa aborting because of a snap store outage :( | 15:35 |
| tumbleweed | sil2100: +1 | 15:35 |
| cjwatson | tumbleweed: yeah, store team is on it | 15:36 |
| sil2100 | tumbleweed: thank you! | 15:41 |
| cjwatson | and I *think* all the LP bits of opening groovy are done | 15:41 |
| sil2100 | tumbleweed: give me a sign if you have stuff uploaded ;) | 15:41 |
| xnox | sil2100: https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/ubuntu-cdimage/core20-beta-builds/+merge/382932 | 15:43 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (focal-proposed/main) [11ubuntu5 => 11ubuntu6] (core, i386-whitelist) | 15:43 | |
| sil2100 | xnox: thanks! | 15:46 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected base-files [source] (focal-proposed) [11ubuntu6] | 15:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (groovy-proposed/main) [11ubuntu5 => 11ubuntu6] (core, i386-whitelist) | 15:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected base-files [source] (groovy-proposed) [11ubuntu6] | 15:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (groovy-proposed/main) [11ubuntu5 => 11ubuntu6] (core, i386-whitelist) | 15:53 | |
| Laney | mdeslaur: are you up for running another ACL command for us please? we need queue admin for ubuntu-release in groovy now, which I think is: for pocket in proposed updates; do edit-acl -p ubuntu-sru -S groovy --pocket $pocket -t admin remove; edit-acl -p ubuntu-release -S groovy --pocket $pocket -t admin add; done | 15:53 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-files [source] (groovy-proposed) [11ubuntu6] | 15:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (focal-proposed/main) [0.43ubuntu1 => 0.43ubuntu1.1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 15:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (groovy-proposed/main) [0.43ubuntu1 => 0.44ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 15:56 | |
| mdeslaur | Laney: sure, one sec | 15:58 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vaultlocker [source] (bionic-backports) [1.0.6-0ubuntu0.19.10.1~ubuntu18.04.1] | 15:59 | |
| mdeslaur | Laney: done. | 16:01 |
| Laney | mdeslaur: nice, thanks again | 16:01 |
| mdeslaur | np | 16:01 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-15 (groovy-proposed/universe) [15~19-1ubuntu2 => 15~19-1ubuntu2] (i386-whitelist) (sync) | 16:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (eoan-proposed/main) [0.40ubuntu3 => 0.40ubuntu4] (core) | 16:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected openjdk-15 [sync] (groovy-proposed) [15~19-1ubuntu2] | 16:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (bionic-proposed/main) [0.37ubuntu0.6 => 0.37ubuntu0.7] (core) | 16:07 | |
| tumbleweed | sil2100: ^^ all uploaded groovy back to xenial | 16:09 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (xenial-proposed/main) [0.28ubuntu0.13 => 0.28ubuntu0.14] (core) | 16:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.44ubuntu1] | 16:09 | |
| tumbleweed | actually, I'll do the two ESMs too... | 16:10 |
| tumbleweed | err one ESM | 16:16 |
| sil2100 | tumbleweed: sweet! Ok, reviewing the SRU ones now | 16:16 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (focal-proposed) [0.43ubuntu1.1] | 16:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.40ubuntu4] | 16:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.37ubuntu0.7] | 16:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.28ubuntu0.14] | 16:23 | |
| bdmurray | popey / wimpress: Do you know if there is a way to get notifications about changes to a post like the Groovy release schedule? | 16:24 |
| popey | i get notifications from it actually. dunno why | 16:26 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openmpi (groovy-proposed/universe) [4.0.3-0ubuntu1 => 4.0.3-6ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) (sync) | 16:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected openmpi [sync] (focal-proposed) [4.0.3-6ubuntu1] | 16:28 | |
| Laney | https://meta.discourse.org/t/wiki-notifications/86680 this says to me that there's a way, but it's not v. clear what that way is | 16:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-defaults (groovy-proposed/main) [2:1.13~1ubuntu2 => 2:1.14~1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync) | 16:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox [sync] (focal-proposed) [6.1.6-dfsg-2] | 16:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (groovy-release/multiverse) [6.1.6-dfsg-1 => 6.1.6-dfsg-2] (ubuntu-cloud) (sync) | 16:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected golang-google-grpc [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.27.1-1] | 16:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-google-grpc (groovy-release/universe) [1.22.1-1ubuntu1 => 1.27.1-1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync) | 16:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected weechat-scripts [sync] (focal-proposed) [20200421-1] | 16:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: weechat-scripts (groovy-release/universe) [20191009-1 => 20200421-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 16:45 | |
| Laney | vorlon: or someone else on the TB: Please could you mark focal release as dirty? We changed the set of signing keys and I want it to re-publish with those. | 17:09 |
| Laney | URGH | 17:09 |
| Laney | NOT FOCAL | 17:09 |
| Laney | groovy | 17:09 |
| Laney | This is the same as me writing '2019' for all of January 2020 | 17:10 |
| cjwatson | "mark-suite-dirty -s groovy" should do it (possibly switching it to python3 in the process, which should work although I can't currently test it ...) | 17:11 |
| cjwatson | in fact I'm just going to commit a #! change, it looks fine | 17:12 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (groovy-proposed/main) [1.0.118ubuntu1 => 1.0.123ubuntu1] (core) | 17:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot amd64 [Groovy Daily] (20101020ubuntu614) has been added | 17:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot arm64 [Groovy Daily] (20101020ubuntu614) has been added | 17:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot armhf [Groovy Daily] (20101020ubuntu614) has been added | 17:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot i386 [Groovy Daily] (20101020ubuntu614) has been added | 17:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot ppc64el [Groovy Daily] (20101020ubuntu614) has been added | 17:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot s390x [Groovy Daily] (20101020ubuntu614) has been added | 17:30 | |
| vorlon | Laney: changed the set of signing keys> archive signing keys? | 17:31 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-9 (groovy-proposed/main) [9.3.0-10ubuntu2 => 9.3.0-11ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 17:31 | |
| vorlon | Laney, cjwatson: command run | 17:31 |
| tsimonq2 | I call dibs on creating the new wiki page for Groovy. | 17:36 |
| * tsimonq2 runs through my personal new-release checklist (well, Lubuntu's, but...): https://phab.lubuntu.me/source/new-release/browse/master/README.md | 17:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: devscripts (focal-proposed/main) [2.20.2ubuntu2 => 2.20.2ubuntu3] (core, i386-whitelist) | 17:37 | |
| ddstreet | Groovy Gorilla, sounds fun | 17:37 |
| tsimonq2 | Indeed. | 17:38 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected devscripts [source] (focal-proposed) [2.20.2ubuntu3] | 17:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: devscripts (groovy-proposed/main) [2.20.2ubuntu2 => 2.20.2ubuntu3] (core, i386-whitelist) | 17:40 | |
| tsimonq2 | I can take care of Lintian unless someone else is already on that. | 17:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.123ubuntu1] | 17:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-9 [source] (groovy-proposed) [9.3.0-11ubuntu1] | 17:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted devscripts [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.20.2ubuntu3] | 17:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-defaults [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2:1.14~1] | 17:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager (bionic-proposed/main) [1.10.6-2ubuntu1.4 => 1.10.6-2ubuntu1.5] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 17:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager (eoan-proposed/main) [1.20.4-2ubuntu2.2 => 1.20.4-2ubuntu2.3] (desktop-core) | 17:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager (focal-proposed/main) [1.22.10-1ubuntu1 => 1.22.10-1ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) | 17:44 | |
| tsimonq2 | https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/304 | 17:46 |
| vorlon | sil2100, Laney, bdmurray: archive opening checklist says to create a 'feature-freeze' milestone but we haven't done that in recent past (or possibly ever) and no one has complained. Unless one of you objects, I'm going to remove it from the checklist | 17:50 |
| bdmurray | vorlon: it might be useful if we were to look at milestones for trello card due dates | 17:52 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: is that an objection, then? | 17:53 |
| bdmurray | vorlon: its a conceptual one not a strenuous one. ;-) | 17:54 |
| vorlon | fyi I'm cleaning up priority mismatches now for groovy... so we'll find out whether that in fact breaks anything | 17:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.95ubuntu0.5 => 1.0.95ubuntu0.6] (core) | 18:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (focal-proposed/main) [1.0.118ubuntu1 => 1.0.118ubuntu1.1] (core) | 18:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (eoan-proposed/main) [1.0.116ubuntu1.1 => 1.0.116ubuntu1.2] (core) | 18:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (xenial-proposed/main) [1.0.78+nmu1ubuntu1.10 => 1.0.78+nmu1ubuntu1.11] (core) | 18:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.118ubuntu1.1] | 18:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.116ubuntu1.2] | 18:19 | |
| Laney | vorlon: ISTR that some teams wanted to use that to track their work items | 18:20 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.95ubuntu0.6] | 18:20 | |
| Laney | but maybe it never got used, so no particular objection | 18:21 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.78+nmu1ubuntu1.11] | 18:23 | |
| sil2100 | vorlon: hey! | 18:23 |
| sil2100 | vorlon: can you do the branch-livefses task? Since I suppose only buildd-admins can do that one | 18:24 |
| sil2100 | I ran the script but it failed at one point | 18:24 |
| sil2100 | (I don't have the powers to set relative_build_score it seems) | 18:25 |
| sil2100 | wgrant: hey! So regarding ceph in focal-proposed, I assume it's something you'd like to have in -updates? | 18:29 |
| vorlon | sil2100: I will take a look at it; currently I'm looking at why proposed-migration doesn't seem to be getting anywhere on snakefruit | 19:41 |
| vorlon | ah because I fixed the p-m run but the archive hasn't changed so archive-reports is skipping. Easy enough to work around | 19:42 |
| vorlon | ... and someone cowboyed an 'exit 0' into the middle of the run-proposed-migration script? pretty sure that's not in the archive opening checklist | 19:43 |
| vorlon | anyway, running now | 19:44 |
| vorlon | sil2100: branch-livefses not updated yet to python3? | 19:45 |
| * vorlon pushes | 19:45 | |
| sil2100 | vorlon: sadly! I think both branch-* scripts are 2.7 still | 19:46 |
| sil2100 | Thank you! | 19:46 |
| vorlon | branch-livefses running now | 19:46 |
| vorlon | sil2100: error because https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/groovy/buildd already exists; deleting, trying again | 19:47 |
| vorlon | sil2100: how many of these got created when you ran it? | 19:49 |
| vorlon | sil2100: in fact, I'm unable to set require_virtualized | 19:51 |
| vorlon | sil2100: so it fails for me anyway | 19:51 |
| Laney | vorlon: I'd have preferred it if you didn't remove that, was waiting for autopkgtest to be ready | 20:01 |
| Laney | I could have been less violent though | 20:02 |
| Laney | it's checking for test results that might not be there now | 20:06 |
| Laney | in fact I'd better kill this; if something falsely gets an ALWAYSFAIL now it could be promoted and I don't even | 20:12 |
| Laney | hopefully nobbled so it doesn't run for groovy only | 20:15 |
| cjwatson | so I can probably do branch-livefses since I'm in launchpad-buildd-admins | 20:18 |
| cjwatson | shall I do that now? | 20:18 |
| cjwatson | (and also in ~ubuntu-cdimage) | 20:19 |
| cjwatson | actually this is surprising, since vorlon is also in ~launchpad-buildd-admins | 20:19 |
| cjwatson | oh, right, it needs ~launchpad-ppa-self-admins or ~launchpad-ppa-admins | 20:20 |
| cjwatson | but I can do it if that's OK | 20:20 |
| cjwatson | Laney,vorlon: ^- | 20:21 |
| Laney | cjwatson: I think that'd be fine | 20:21 |
| vorlon | cjwatson: well I'm patching the script so that it can do something reasonable on already-existing livefs builds; testing now and then I can push if you want to use it | 20:21 |
| cjwatson | sure, tell me when | 20:22 |
| vorlon | cjwatson: pushed | 20:22 |
| cjwatson | vorlon: have you created the livefses, just not devirted them etc., then? | 20:24 |
| vorlon | cjwatson: sil2100 created them | 20:24 |
| cjwatson | vorlon: (that would be helpful since I'm not in ~cloud-images-release-managers) | 20:24 |
| vorlon | oh I can go create those | 20:24 |
| vorlon | I stopped at ubuntu-cdimage so far | 20:24 |
| cjwatson | Yeah if you could do all three that'd be perfect, and then I can power them up | 20:25 |
| vorlon | ok | 20:25 |
| vorlon | if [ "$SERIES" = focal ] -o [ "$SERIES" = groovy ]; then | 20:29 |
| vorlon | >_< | 20:29 |
| cjwatson | Where's that? | 20:30 |
| vorlon | in britney | 20:30 |
| vorlon | fixed now :) | 20:31 |
| cjwatson | Yeah that's not ideal :) | 20:31 |
| vorlon | doko, Laney: which of you is cowboying the changes to run-proposed-migration? | 20:35 |
| vorlon | I have no idea what "proposed-migration is still seeding" is supposed to mean | 20:35 |
| cjwatson | vorlon: (ideally soon - it's 21:43 local and I don't want to stick around much longer) | 20:43 |
| vorlon | ah sorry, hit more errors again | 20:44 |
| vorlon | cjwatson: ok cloud-image-release-managers and cloudware are done, ubuntu-cdimage is still working through the list | 20:57 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Kubuntu amd64 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added | 21:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Lubuntu amd64 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added | 21:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu GNOME amd64 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added | 21:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu GNOME i386 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added | 21:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu MATE amd64 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added | 21:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu MATE i386 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added | 21:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Lubuntu i386 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added | 21:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu Server amd64 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added | 21:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu Server i386 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added | 21:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu Studio amd64 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added | 21:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu Studio i386 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added | 21:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu amd64 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added | 21:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Kubuntu i386 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added | 21:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu i386 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added | 21:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade UbuntuKylin amd64 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added | 21:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade UbuntuKylin i386 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added | 21:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Xubuntu amd64 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added | 21:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Xubuntu i386 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added | 21:01 | |
| vorlon | cjwatson: ubuntu-cdimage livefses created. and the script is now more happily idempotent | 21:03 |
| cjwatson | vorlon: OK, preferred invocation? | 21:04 |
| cjwatson | (I mean, I only wrote this script, can't be expected to remember it ...) | 21:04 |
| vorlon | cjwatson: for owner in cloudware ubuntu-cdimage cloud-images-release-managers; do ./branch-livefses --source-series=focal --dest-series=groovy $owner; done | 21:04 |
| vorlon | :) | 21:05 |
| vorlon | now afk for a spell | 21:05 |
| cjwatson | running | 21:05 |
| cjwatson | Seems to be doing reasonable things | 21:07 |
| Laney | vorlon: It's me, I highlighted you and updated this channel to say I was doing it | 21:16 |
| cjwatson | vorlon: should all be done now | 21:42 |
| vorlon | Laney: ah sorry, missed that | 22:13 |
| Laney | np | 22:15 |
| Laney | the sync just finished | 22:15 |
| Laney | so I need to do download-results on the web node now | 22:15 |
| Laney | http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/gzip this is getting silly, we need to do some purging | 22:17 |
| vorlon | Laney: so I guess we should record the dependency as well for the future, to wait for autopkgtest stuff to finish before doing the p-m bits? | 22:18 |
| Laney | vorlon: Sounds sensible, yeah | 22:19 |
| Laney | I think results are downloaded now | 22:19 |
| * Laney pushes config changes | 22:19 | |
| Laney | there's still some cowboys for i386 testing which I will update but should be committed | 22:21 |
| wgrant | sil2100: ceph> yeah, though I guess that means it needs an SRU bug etc. now | 22:26 |
| Laney | think I might finish off the rest of the autopkgtest enablement/proposed-migration tomorrow | 22:30 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1050.55] (no packageset) | 23:15 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!