=== pieq-afk is now known as pieq
[07:05] <ricotz> hello, please get libreoffice accepted - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=
[07:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pulseaudio [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:11.1-1ubuntu7.6]
=== Guest10938 is now known as slyon
[07:19] <cpaelzer> sil2100: hi, do you remember when we said spice can be a zero day SRU past the release?
[07:19] <cpaelzer> sil2100: I don't know what happened exactly but its state is odd (at least to me)
[07:20] <cpaelzer> I got the "it got released" mail yesterday and thought things are done
[07:20] <cpaelzer> and also I see
[07:20] <cpaelzer>  spice | 0.14.2-4ubuntu3          | focal-updates    | source
[07:20] <cpaelzer> so far so good
[07:20] <cpaelzer> but just now I got a mail about it being accepted to proposed
[07:20] <cpaelzer> there must be something wrong in between release/SRU of this package
[07:21] <cpaelzer> could you (or another archive/sru person) take a look and tell me if any action on my side is needed?
[07:23] <cpaelzer> Laney: you released the package, let me know if there was anything special about it?
[07:26] <sil2100> cpaelzer: I think everything looks fine here
[07:27] <cpaelzer> ok, I was just wondering about the order the mails arrived
[07:27] <cpaelzer> and would have assumed that it will be removed from -proposed
[07:27] <cpaelzer> when being released
[07:27] <sil2100> cpaelzer: so I see the package in both -updates and -proposed right now, with the -proposed one being published earlier than -updates, as expected
[07:27] <cpaelzer> really
[07:27] <cpaelzer> ok then it is just mail-ordering
[07:27] <sil2100> ah, no, once a series gets stable, the -proposed removal is manual
[07:27] <cpaelzer> thanks for checking sil2100
[07:27] <sil2100> Like we clean out the -proposed packages after accepting SRUs manually ;)
[08:49] <marcustomlinson> tjaalton: could I ask for a review on the update-manager SRU for focal. It's a very small change for a rather large impact
[08:51] <tjaalton> marcustomlinson: sure
[08:51] <marcustomlinson> thanks!
=== TheMaverick is now known as xMaverick
[09:50] <tjaalton> huh, sru-review it's saying I'm not authorized to accept it
[09:50] <tjaalton> maybe lp login expired, but shouldn't it refresh it?
[09:53] <Laney> I think we didn't give ubuntu-sru the right access yet
[09:54] <Laney> step 15 on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NewReleaseCycleProcess - who can do that?
[09:55] <tjaalton> ahah
[09:56] <tjaalton> apw: ^ can you help?
[09:56] <tjaalton> or sil2100 maybe..
[09:57] <Laney> it's "launchpad.Edit"
[09:57] <Laney> nto sure if that is ~ubuntu-drivers or an actual Launchpad admin
[09:57] <tjaalton> wgrant then? :)
[09:58] <wgrant> Not me.
[09:58] <wgrant> Probably archive owner
[09:58] <wgrant> But I forget and am afk
[09:59] <tjaalton> sure, no worries
[09:59] <Laney> Someone in ~ubuntu-archive might as well try
[10:02] <doko> Laney: why start again with the wiki page when we have the google doc?
[10:03] <Laney> because linking a private document in a public channel is quite unfriendly
[10:03] <doko> then make it public? sil2100?
[10:03] <Laney> The wiki pages are still canonical
[10:03] <Laney> sorry this is an argument I'm not really up for having
[10:06] <cjwatson> Laney: ~techboard
[10:06] <cjwatson> For primary archives, launchpad.Edit needs the distribution owner
[10:07] <Laney> OK, I'm not always sure how to map launchpad.Edit to a team, thanks
[10:07] <cjwatson> (Or in general ~admins, i.e. IS, can nearly always do stuff)
[10:07] <cjwatson> lp.security (or occasionally lp.<app>.security) defines those rules
[10:10] <Laney> mdeslaur: stgraber: ^- maybe one of you could help out with that step please so we can start processing SRUs for focal?
[10:11] <Laney> possibly that should be split in two and moved from NewReleaseCycleProcess to ReleaseProcess
[10:11] <Laney> although ideally we would clear out PREVIOUS-proposed before, I guess ...
[10:13] <rbasak> Laney: FWIW, Focal Unapproved has now appeared at https://trello.com/b/XgBxtrZ9/sru (another board driving by the same script).
[10:13] <rbasak> driven by
[10:15] <Laney> tjaalton: (In the meantime you could proxy your accepts through someone in ~ubuntu-archive)
[10:15] <Laney> rbasak: Nice one
[10:15] <Laney> I think the situation will probably be a little bit confusing for the SRU team until we've cleared the syncs out, at least
[10:16] <rbasak> Of course :)
[10:16] <rbasak> I didn't really expect to touch anything until the release team says so
[10:17] <Laney> There's a slightly elevated risk given that focal-proposed is still full of junk, but if you're careful enough I think you can do some SRU processing for higher-priority issues
[10:24] <tjaalton> only 15 packages
[10:25] <ricotz> please accept libreoffice https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1874285
[10:25] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1874285 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal) " [SRU] libreoffice 6.4.3 for focal" [High,In progress]
[10:26] <ricotz> it will also take care of an upgrade issue from bionic
[10:40] <Laney> tjaalton: actually I think I can still accept things into proposed if you want to give me a sign
[11:00] <tjaalton> Laney: update-manager is fine
[11:09] <mdeslaur> Laney: so, step 15 from the wiki?
[11:16] <mdeslaur> Laney: done.
[11:17] <tjaalton> mdeslaur: thanks, works :)
[11:17] <mdeslaur> cool :)
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.10]
[11:21] <Laney> mdeslaur: thanks!
[11:23] <mdeslaur> yw!
[14:50] <xnox> popey:  https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/groovy-gorilla-release-schedule/15531 is "locked" with ACLs right? I think we are ok with comments, but people may not edit it. Similar to how the Release Tracking document was.
[14:56] <popey> Ya, the release category is "see" for everyone and "create / reply / see" for the release-team. Perhaps I should add "Canonical" as create/reply/see too?
[14:57] <popey> which seems reasonable
[15:00] <Laney> if it's possible to sync groups on Discourse with Launchpad groups I'd probably be OK with letting ~ubuntu-dev have edit rights there
[15:04] <popey> I do not think it can do that, might be a question for IS
[15:14]  * tumbleweed does the distro-info-data dance
[15:22] <Laney> ah
[15:22] <Laney> sil2100: ^^^^
[15:22] <Laney> don't you two collide
[15:28] <tumbleweed> if someone else is going to, I'll happily do dayjob work instead :)
[15:28] <tumbleweed> but I need to get the Debian side done, at least
[15:28] <Laney> It's probably OK, I just didn't want you two to duplicate each others work
[15:32] <sil2100> tumbleweed: if you want then feel free!
[15:33] <sil2100> I'll do debootstrap then
[15:33] <sil2100> tumbleweed: will you do the SRUs also? I can then review those
[15:34] <cjwatson> FWIW I committed the debootstrap change to Debian, though haven't particularly bothered to upload
[15:34] <cjwatson> we have an Ubuntu delta anyway so doesn't hurt to upload that
[15:35] <tumbleweed> People at work reporting upgrades to fossa aborting because of a snap store outage :(
[15:35] <tumbleweed> sil2100: +1
[15:36] <cjwatson> tumbleweed: yeah, store team is on it
[15:41] <sil2100> tumbleweed: thank you!
[15:41] <cjwatson> and I *think* all the LP bits of opening groovy are done
[15:41] <sil2100> tumbleweed: give me a sign if you have stuff uploaded ;)
[15:43] <xnox> sil2100:  https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/ubuntu-cdimage/core20-beta-builds/+merge/382932
[15:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (focal-proposed/main) [11ubuntu5 => 11ubuntu6] (core, i386-whitelist)
[15:46] <sil2100> xnox: thanks!
[15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected base-files [source] (focal-proposed) [11ubuntu6]
[15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (groovy-proposed/main) [11ubuntu5 => 11ubuntu6] (core, i386-whitelist)
[15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected base-files [source] (groovy-proposed) [11ubuntu6]
[15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (groovy-proposed/main) [11ubuntu5 => 11ubuntu6] (core, i386-whitelist)
[15:53] <Laney> mdeslaur: are you up for running another ACL command for us please? we need queue admin for ubuntu-release in groovy now, which I think is: for pocket in proposed updates; do edit-acl -p ubuntu-sru -S groovy --pocket $pocket -t admin remove; edit-acl -p ubuntu-release -S groovy --pocket $pocket -t admin add; done
[15:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-files [source] (groovy-proposed) [11ubuntu6]
[15:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (focal-proposed/main) [0.43ubuntu1 => 0.43ubuntu1.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[15:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (groovy-proposed/main) [0.43ubuntu1 => 0.44ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[15:58] <mdeslaur> Laney: sure, one sec
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vaultlocker [source] (bionic-backports) [1.0.6-0ubuntu0.19.10.1~ubuntu18.04.1]
[16:01] <mdeslaur> Laney: done.
[16:01] <Laney> mdeslaur: nice, thanks again
[16:01] <mdeslaur> np
[16:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-15 (groovy-proposed/universe) [15~19-1ubuntu2 => 15~19-1ubuntu2] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[16:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (eoan-proposed/main) [0.40ubuntu3 => 0.40ubuntu4] (core)
[16:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected openjdk-15 [sync] (groovy-proposed) [15~19-1ubuntu2]
[16:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (bionic-proposed/main) [0.37ubuntu0.6 => 0.37ubuntu0.7] (core)
[16:09] <tumbleweed> sil2100: ^^ all uploaded groovy back to xenial
[16:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (xenial-proposed/main) [0.28ubuntu0.13 => 0.28ubuntu0.14] (core)
[16:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.44ubuntu1]
[16:10] <tumbleweed> actually, I'll do the two ESMs too...
[16:16] <tumbleweed> err one ESM
[16:16] <sil2100> tumbleweed: sweet! Ok, reviewing the SRU ones now
[16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (focal-proposed) [0.43ubuntu1.1]
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.40ubuntu4]
[16:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.37ubuntu0.7]
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.28ubuntu0.14]
[16:24] <bdmurray> popey / wimpress: Do you know if there is a way to get notifications about changes to a post like the Groovy release schedule?
[16:26] <popey> i get notifications from it actually. dunno why
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openmpi (groovy-proposed/universe) [4.0.3-0ubuntu1 => 4.0.3-6ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) (sync)
[16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected openmpi [sync] (focal-proposed) [4.0.3-6ubuntu1]
[16:29] <Laney> https://meta.discourse.org/t/wiki-notifications/86680 this says to me that there's a way, but it's not v. clear what that way is
[16:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-defaults (groovy-proposed/main) [2:1.13~1ubuntu2 => 2:1.14~1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[16:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox [sync] (focal-proposed) [6.1.6-dfsg-2]
[16:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (groovy-release/multiverse) [6.1.6-dfsg-1 => 6.1.6-dfsg-2] (ubuntu-cloud) (sync)
[16:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected golang-google-grpc [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.27.1-1]
[16:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-google-grpc (groovy-release/universe) [1.22.1-1ubuntu1 => 1.27.1-1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[16:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected weechat-scripts [sync] (focal-proposed) [20200421-1]
[16:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: weechat-scripts (groovy-release/universe) [20191009-1 => 20200421-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:09] <Laney> vorlon: or someone else on the TB: Please could you mark focal release as dirty? We changed the set of signing keys and I want it to re-publish with those.
[17:09] <Laney> URGH
[17:09] <Laney> NOT FOCAL
[17:09] <Laney> groovy
[17:10] <Laney> This is the same as me writing '2019' for all of January 2020
[17:11] <cjwatson> "mark-suite-dirty -s groovy" should do it (possibly switching it to python3 in the process, which should work although I can't currently test it ...)
[17:12] <cjwatson> in fact I'm just going to commit a #! change, it looks fine
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (groovy-proposed/main) [1.0.118ubuntu1 => 1.0.123ubuntu1] (core)
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot amd64 [Groovy Daily] (20101020ubuntu614) has been added
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot arm64 [Groovy Daily] (20101020ubuntu614) has been added
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot armhf [Groovy Daily] (20101020ubuntu614) has been added
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot i386 [Groovy Daily] (20101020ubuntu614) has been added
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot ppc64el [Groovy Daily] (20101020ubuntu614) has been added
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot s390x [Groovy Daily] (20101020ubuntu614) has been added
[17:31] <vorlon> Laney: changed the set of signing keys> archive signing keys?
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-9 (groovy-proposed/main) [9.3.0-10ubuntu2 => 9.3.0-11ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:31] <vorlon> Laney, cjwatson: command run
[17:36] <tsimonq2> I call dibs on creating the new wiki page for Groovy.
[17:37]  * tsimonq2 runs through my personal new-release checklist (well, Lubuntu's, but...): https://phab.lubuntu.me/source/new-release/browse/master/README.md
[17:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: devscripts (focal-proposed/main) [2.20.2ubuntu2 => 2.20.2ubuntu3] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:37] <ddstreet> Groovy Gorilla, sounds fun
[17:38] <tsimonq2> Indeed.
[17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected devscripts [source] (focal-proposed) [2.20.2ubuntu3]
[17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: devscripts (groovy-proposed/main) [2.20.2ubuntu2 => 2.20.2ubuntu3] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:41] <tsimonq2> I can take care of Lintian unless someone else is already on that.
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.123ubuntu1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-9 [source] (groovy-proposed) [9.3.0-11ubuntu1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted devscripts [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.20.2ubuntu3]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-defaults [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2:1.14~1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager (bionic-proposed/main) [1.10.6-2ubuntu1.4 => 1.10.6-2ubuntu1.5] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[17:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager (eoan-proposed/main) [1.20.4-2ubuntu2.2 => 1.20.4-2ubuntu2.3] (desktop-core)
[17:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager (focal-proposed/main) [1.22.10-1ubuntu1 => 1.22.10-1ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[17:46] <tsimonq2> https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/304
[17:50] <vorlon> sil2100, Laney, bdmurray: archive opening checklist says to create a 'feature-freeze' milestone but we haven't done that in recent past (or possibly ever) and no one has complained.  Unless one of you objects, I'm going to remove it from the checklist
[17:52] <bdmurray> vorlon: it might be useful if we were to look at milestones for trello card due dates
[17:53] <vorlon> bdmurray: is that an objection, then?
[17:54] <bdmurray> vorlon: its a conceptual one not a strenuous one. ;-)
[17:59] <vorlon> fyi I'm cleaning up priority mismatches now for groovy... so we'll find out whether that in fact breaks anything
[18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.95ubuntu0.5 => 1.0.95ubuntu0.6] (core)
[18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (focal-proposed/main) [1.0.118ubuntu1 => 1.0.118ubuntu1.1] (core)
[18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (eoan-proposed/main) [1.0.116ubuntu1.1 => 1.0.116ubuntu1.2] (core)
[18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (xenial-proposed/main) [1.0.78+nmu1ubuntu1.10 => 1.0.78+nmu1ubuntu1.11] (core)
[18:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.118ubuntu1.1]
[18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.116ubuntu1.2]
[18:20] <Laney> vorlon: ISTR that some teams wanted to use that to track their work items
[18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.95ubuntu0.6]
[18:21] <Laney> but maybe it never got used, so no particular objection
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.78+nmu1ubuntu1.11]
[18:23] <sil2100> vorlon: hey!
[18:24] <sil2100> vorlon: can you do the branch-livefses task? Since I suppose only buildd-admins can do that one
[18:24] <sil2100> I ran the script but it failed at one point
[18:25] <sil2100> (I don't have the powers to set relative_build_score it seems)
[18:29] <sil2100> wgrant: hey! So regarding ceph in focal-proposed, I assume it's something you'd like to have in -updates?
[19:41] <vorlon> sil2100: I will take a look at it; currently I'm looking at why proposed-migration doesn't seem to be getting anywhere on snakefruit
[19:42] <vorlon> ah because I fixed the p-m run but the archive hasn't changed so archive-reports is skipping.  Easy enough to work around
[19:43] <vorlon> ... and someone cowboyed an 'exit 0' into the middle of the run-proposed-migration script? pretty sure that's not in the archive opening checklist
[19:44] <vorlon> anyway, running now
[19:45] <vorlon> sil2100: branch-livefses not updated yet to python3?
[19:45]  * vorlon pushes
[19:46] <sil2100> vorlon: sadly! I think both branch-* scripts are 2.7 still
[19:46] <sil2100> Thank you!
[19:46] <vorlon> branch-livefses running now
[19:47] <vorlon> sil2100: error because https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/groovy/buildd already exists; deleting, trying again
[19:49] <vorlon> sil2100: how many of these got created when you ran it?
[19:51] <vorlon> sil2100: in fact, I'm unable to set require_virtualized
[19:51] <vorlon> sil2100: so it fails for me anyway
[20:01] <Laney> vorlon: I'd have preferred it if you didn't remove that, was waiting for autopkgtest to be ready
[20:02] <Laney> I could have been less violent though
[20:06] <Laney> it's checking for test results that might not be there now
[20:12] <Laney> in fact I'd better kill this; if something falsely gets an ALWAYSFAIL now it could be promoted and I don't even
[20:15] <Laney> hopefully nobbled so it doesn't run for groovy only
[20:18] <cjwatson> so I can probably do branch-livefses since I'm in launchpad-buildd-admins
[20:18] <cjwatson> shall I do that now?
[20:19] <cjwatson> (and also in ~ubuntu-cdimage)
[20:19] <cjwatson> actually this is surprising, since vorlon is also in ~launchpad-buildd-admins
[20:20] <cjwatson> oh, right, it needs ~launchpad-ppa-self-admins or ~launchpad-ppa-admins
[20:20] <cjwatson> but I can do it if that's OK
[20:21] <cjwatson> Laney,vorlon: ^-
[20:21] <Laney> cjwatson: I think that'd be fine
[20:21] <vorlon> cjwatson: well I'm patching the script so that it can do something reasonable on already-existing livefs builds; testing now and then I can push if you want to use it
[20:22] <cjwatson> sure, tell me when
[20:22] <vorlon> cjwatson: pushed
[20:24] <cjwatson> vorlon: have you created the livefses, just not devirted them etc., then?
[20:24] <vorlon> cjwatson: sil2100 created them
[20:24] <cjwatson> vorlon: (that would be helpful since I'm not in ~cloud-images-release-managers)
[20:24] <vorlon> oh I can go create those
[20:24] <vorlon> I stopped at ubuntu-cdimage so far
[20:25] <cjwatson> Yeah if you could do all three that'd be perfect, and then I can power them up
[20:25] <vorlon> ok
[20:29] <vorlon>     if [ "$SERIES" = focal ] -o [ "$SERIES" = groovy ]; then
[20:29] <vorlon> >_<
[20:30] <cjwatson> Where's that?
[20:30] <vorlon> in britney
[20:31] <vorlon> fixed now :)
[20:31] <cjwatson> Yeah that's not ideal :)
[20:35] <vorlon> doko, Laney: which of you is cowboying the changes to run-proposed-migration?
[20:35] <vorlon> I have no idea what "proposed-migration is still seeding" is supposed to mean
[20:43] <cjwatson> vorlon: (ideally soon - it's 21:43 local and I don't want to stick around much longer)
[20:44] <vorlon> ah sorry, hit more errors again
[20:57] <vorlon> cjwatson: ok cloud-image-release-managers and cloudware are done, ubuntu-cdimage is still working through the list
[21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Kubuntu amd64 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added
[21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Lubuntu amd64 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu GNOME amd64 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu GNOME i386 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu MATE amd64 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu MATE i386 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Lubuntu i386 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu Server amd64 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu Server i386 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu Studio amd64 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu Studio i386 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu amd64 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Kubuntu i386 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu i386 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade UbuntuKylin amd64 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade UbuntuKylin i386 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Xubuntu amd64 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Xubuntu i386 [Groovy Daily] (20200424) has been added
[21:03] <vorlon> cjwatson: ubuntu-cdimage livefses created. and the script is now more happily idempotent
[21:04] <cjwatson> vorlon: OK, preferred invocation?
[21:04] <cjwatson> (I mean, I only wrote this script, can't be expected to remember it ...)
[21:04] <vorlon> cjwatson: for owner in cloudware ubuntu-cdimage cloud-images-release-managers; do ./branch-livefses --source-series=focal --dest-series=groovy $owner; done
[21:05] <vorlon> :)
[21:05] <vorlon> now afk for a spell
[21:05] <cjwatson> running
[21:07] <cjwatson> Seems to be doing reasonable things
[21:16] <Laney> vorlon: It's me, I highlighted you and updated this channel to say I was doing it
[21:42] <cjwatson> vorlon: should all be done now
[22:13] <vorlon> Laney: ah sorry, missed that
[22:15] <Laney> np
[22:15] <Laney> the sync just finished
[22:15] <Laney> so I need to do download-results on the web node now
[22:17] <Laney> http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/gzip this is getting silly, we need to do some purging
[22:18] <vorlon> Laney: so I guess we should record the dependency as well for the future, to wait for autopkgtest stuff to finish before doing the p-m bits?
[22:19] <Laney> vorlon: Sounds sensible, yeah
[22:19] <Laney> I think results are downloaded now
[22:19]  * Laney pushes config changes
[22:21] <Laney> there's still some cowboys for i386 testing which I will update but should be committed
[22:26] <wgrant> sil2100: ceph> yeah, though I guess that means it needs an SRU bug etc. now
[22:30] <Laney> think I might finish off the rest of the autopkgtest enablement/proposed-migration tomorrow
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1050.55] (no packageset)