| sil2100 | wgrant: ceph is already in -proposed and we could basically treat it as an 0-day SRU | 00:23 |
|---|---|---|
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1050.55] | 02:54 | |
| === Eickmeyer is now known as Eickmeyer[q] | ||
| vorlon | Laney: btw I'm not sure the i386 cowboys are actually required; I had implemented it differently in git and waffled about whether to drop the cowboyed bit | 03:57 |
| Laney | vorlon: great, let's get that sorted out then | 08:11 |
| Laney | right, autopkgtests look good to me | 08:38 |
| Laney | let's do a run | 08:38 |
| Laney | (of proposed-migration) | 08:46 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openmpi [sync] (groovy-proposed) [4.0.3-6ubuntu1] | 09:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: weechat-scripts (groovy-proposed/universe) [20191009-1 => 20200421-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 09:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-google-grpc (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.22.1-1ubuntu1 => 1.27.1-1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync) | 09:35 | |
| Laney | could someone in ubuntu-archive reject those three syncs to groovy *release* please? | 09:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-google-grpc [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.27.1-1] | 09:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted weechat-scripts [sync] (groovy-proposed) [20200421-1] | 09:36 | |
| doko | Laney: done | 10:26 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected golang-google-grpc [sync] (groovy-release) [1.27.1-1] | 10:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected weechat-scripts [sync] (groovy-release) [20200421-1] | 10:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox [sync] (groovy-release) [6.1.6-dfsg-2] | 10:27 | |
| Laney | doko: thanks | 10:27 |
| Laney | looks good to open to me I'd say | 10:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-9 (groovy-proposed/main) [9.3.0-11ubuntu1 => 9.3.0-11ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 10:31 | |
| doko | yes, the s390x gcc-9 build on s390x succeeded, for the other archs it's just a normal upload | 10:33 |
| doko | Laney: does britney migration now wait on riscv64? | 10:33 |
| Laney | no change since focal yet | 10:34 |
| doko | please enable that, or else transitions will be out of sync in a day or two | 10:36 |
| juliank | Upgraded my server to focal, everything seems to work fine | 10:36 |
| doko | during the freeze we didn't have any transitions | 10:36 |
| Laney | ok, but it implies active fixing will likely be required so we should probably mention it in the opening email | 10:37 |
| doko | Laney: and probably it should be enabled for focal now as well | 10:37 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-9 [source] (groovy-proposed) [9.3.0-11ubuntu2] | 10:41 | |
| juliank | ubuntu-security-status does not give me a list of packages, sigh | 10:44 |
| juliank | Let's enable esm-infra and esm-apps | 10:46 |
| juliank | :) | 10:46 |
| juliank | And I gotta upload python-apt with groovy template | 10:46 |
| Laney | there's a list somewhere of packages that need uploading | 10:47 |
| juliank | yes, but I already got a bug report from unhappy users about it, and it breaks a ton of autopkgtests :D | 10:48 |
| juliank | I think it needs moving up in the list we have, because it does cause quite a few unnecessary test failures | 10:49 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-10 (groovy-proposed/main) [10-20200411-0ubuntu1 => 10-20200425-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) | 10:51 | |
| juliank | Oh Laney, I thought it's groovy gorilla, but archive just says Groovy? | 10:52 |
| juliank | Launchpad says Groovy, focal is The Focal Fossa | 10:52 |
| Laney | it is, that'll be changed | 10:52 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-apt (groovy-proposed/main) [2.0.0 => 2.0.0ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 11:00 | |
| juliank | ^ Anyhow, I'll just leave that here, accept as needed | 11:00 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-apt [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.0.0ubuntu1] | 11:03 | |
| juliank | We can then sync python-apt 2.1.3 over it later (not yet available), which removes the python-apt binary package (aka python2 support) | 11:09 |
| juliank | This way we get the minimal thing to unblock migration for various packages without entangling it with py2removal :) | 11:10 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-10 [source] (groovy-proposed) [10-20200425-1ubuntu1] | 11:10 | |
| juliank | groovy | 11:11 |
| ginggs | i can't retry autopkgtests: | 15:35 |
| ginggs | You submitted an invalid request: Unknown release groovy | 15:35 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-10 (groovy-proposed/main) [10-20200425-1ubuntu1 => 10-20200425-1ubuntu2] (i386-whitelist) | 16:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-10 [source] (groovy-proposed) [10-20200425-1ubuntu2] | 16:21 | |
| doko | Laney: ^^^ | 16:22 |
| ginggs | autopkgtests retries working now, thanks whomever :) | 16:46 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: llvm-toolchain-10 (groovy-proposed/main) [1:10.0.0-4ubuntu1 => 1:10.0.0-4ubuntu2] (i386-whitelist) | 16:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted llvm-toolchain-10 [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:10.0.0-4ubuntu2] | 16:50 | |
| juliank | Oh, forgot distro-info-data | 18:43 |
| juliank | Ah it's in there, just gotta retry failures | 18:43 |
| vorlon | doko: britney did already wait for riscv64; so there's no change, and transitions should not go out of sync? | 19:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: remmina (groovy-proposed/main) [1.4.2+dfsg-1ubuntu1 => 1.4.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 21:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby2.7 (groovy-proposed/main) [2.7.0-5ubuntu1 => 2.7.0-6ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) | 21:46 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!