=== housecat is now known as dax | ||
lotuspsychje | good morning | 03:05 |
---|---|---|
ducasse | good morning | 05:41 |
lordievader | Good morning | 06:12 |
lotuspsychje | !info e17 | 09:33 |
ubot5 | 'focal' is not a valid distribution: bionic, bionic-backports, bionic-proposed, cosmic, cosmic-backports, cosmic-proposed, disco, disco-backports, disco-proposed, eoan, eoan-backports, eoan-proposed, kubuntu-backports, kubuntu-experimental, kubuntu-updates, partner, precise, precise-backports, precise-proposed, stable, testing, trusty, trusty-backports, trusty-proposed, unstable, xenial, xenial-backports, xenial-proposed | 09:33 |
lotuspsychje | absence: the difference between a support question and a discussion: | 09:53 |
lotuspsychje | can you help me with making java work i need it for program x | 09:54 |
lotuspsychje | discussion: please explain me why openjdk 13 has been removed from the repos | 09:54 |
lotuspsychje | absence: we try to divide discussions and support questions into the right channels | 09:55 |
ducasse | answer: it was never there | 09:55 |
absence | lotuspsychje: to me they both look like support questions, but i'm happy to ask here if that's better :) | 09:55 |
absence | ducasse: what do you mean? | 09:57 |
absence | https://packages.ubuntu.com/source/eoan/openjdk-13 | 09:57 |
ducasse | !info openjdk-13 eoan | 09:57 |
ubot5 | Package openjdk-13 does not exist in eoan | 09:58 |
absence | !info openjdk-13-jdk eoan | 09:59 |
ubot5 | openjdk-13-jdk (source: openjdk-13): OpenJDK Development Kit (JDK). In component universe, is optional. Version 13+33-1 (eoan), package size 10 kB, installed size 53 kB | 09:59 |
absence | !info openjdk-13-jdk focal | 09:59 |
ubot5 | 'focal' is not a valid distribution: bionic, bionic-backports, bionic-proposed, cosmic, cosmic-backports, cosmic-proposed, disco, disco-backports, disco-proposed, eoan, eoan-backports, eoan-proposed, kubuntu-backports, kubuntu-experimental, kubuntu-updates, partner, precise, precise-backports, precise-proposed, stable, testing, trusty, trusty-backports, trusty-proposed, unstable, xenial, xenial-backports, xenial-proposed | 09:59 |
absence | ducasse: confusing | 09:59 |
ducasse | launchpad lists it as a debian package only | 10:00 |
lotuspsychje | absence: tell us why you need 13 for exactly? | 10:00 |
absence | ducasse: it was in 19.10 and was removed, but there's no info in the release notes, so i'm just trying to find out what is the ubuntu way to install it | 10:01 |
ducasse | if it's not in the repos there is no official way | 10:01 |
absence | lotuspsychje: development at work | 10:02 |
lotuspsychje | absence: wich feature do you need from 13 you dont have in 11? | 10:02 |
absence | lotuspsychje: i've no idea, it's what all the projects are set up for | 10:04 |
lotuspsychje | absence: try 11 and let us know what you miss? | 10:04 |
absence | lotuspsychje: looks like something is specifically looking for java 13 | 10:18 |
absence | anyway, if there's no ubuntu package for it anymore, i'll just get it from java.net | 10:18 |
lotuspsychje | absence: 'something' ? | 10:19 |
absence | lotuspsychje: yes, something. i'm not about to spend time on what it is when i can fix it by installing the version we're using :) | 10:20 |
ducasse | you could look for a third party repo | 10:22 |
lotuspsychje | absence: did you actually try 11? | 10:22 |
daftykins | it's not really advisable to go backwards with things like java, functions could be used that simply don't exist in an earlier edition | 10:23 |
daftykins | however, it also doesn't make sense that you would rush to adopt a newer LTS | 10:24 |
lotuspsychje | im pretty curious about what actually not working in 11 | 10:25 |
absence | daftykins: i'm not on lts, this is just a dev machine, not the prod server | 10:26 |
lotuspsychje | absence: but your original question was why 20.04 dint have 13 right | 10:27 |
daftykins | absence: are you not asking about openjdk on focal? i.e. 20.04 i.e. LTS | 10:27 |
daftykins | devs work on stable hosts in order to target stable releases. | 10:28 |
absence | daftykins: well yes, but i upgraded from 19.10, so i'm not following lts releases | 10:28 |
absence | lts wasn't viable last time because of hardware support issues, but focal seems to work, so maybe it's a good idea to stay on lts this time | 10:31 |
jeremy31 | lotuspsychje: discovered has a wifi that is supported only by rtl8812au-dkms in the repos | 10:52 |
jeremy31 | I wonder if it has not been patched for 20.04 | 10:53 |
lotuspsychje | jeremy31: he's on 20.04 | 10:53 |
lotuspsychje | his system seems up to date with kernel 5.4 -28 too | 10:54 |
jeremy31 | He is using an out of tree unsigned module from the dmesg | 10:56 |
lotuspsychje | oh? | 10:56 |
jeremy31 | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rtl8812au/+bug/1875016 | 10:57 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1875016 in rtl8812au (Ubuntu) "Driver doesn't work on Ubuntu 20.04 " [Undecided,New] | 10:57 |
jeremy31 | Last change to rtl8812au-dkms was July 2019 | 10:58 |
lotuspsychje | tnx jeremy31 | 10:59 |
jeremy31 | It might be best to file a new bug report with apport info | 10:59 |
lotuspsychje | yeah | 10:59 |
lotuspsychje | jeremy31: requested an apport-collect on that bug | 11:02 |
lotuspsychje | leftyfb: zahnx is being trolly since few days, offensive and all | 14:52 |
leftyfb | ok, I'm done. Nothing but a bunch of trolls in there today | 16:06 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!