/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/05/05/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted svgtune [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.3.0-1]00:12
EickmeyerRelease team: As discussed above between myself and cjwatson, it appears as though inkscape (i386) needs a hint.01:53
Eickmeyerin groovy01:53
tewardum, guys, I think piuparts and debootstrap are broken.02:48
tewardhttps://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/amd64/p/piuparts/20200504_192251_db5e4@/log.gz02:48
tewardand yet it's trying to do focal autopkgtests02:48
tewardthis is holding up the nginx migration02:48
tewardthe four failures are, however, not nginx related.02:48
tewardfailure is the same error in all four piuparts nginx-triggered failures.02:49
tewardso either that needs an exception or someone to fix piuparts.02:50
teward(or rather, debootstrap)02:50
vorlonEickmeyer: it actually needs the build-deps sorted so they're built on i386; working on that04:16
vorlonwgrant, cjwatson: ok, gtkspell3 copy-package did create the i386 build record, so it seems that does work as intended now04:19
wgrantGreat04:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed discount from i386-whitelist in groovy04:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed gogo from i386-whitelist in groovy04:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed ruby-did-you-mean from i386-whitelist in groovy04:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed ruby-json from i386-whitelist in groovy04:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed ruby-rdiscount from i386-whitelist in groovy04:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added apiguardian to i386-whitelist in groovy04:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gtkspell3 to i386-whitelist in groovy04:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added junit5 to i386-whitelist in groovy04:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added opentest4j to i386-whitelist in groovy04:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added univocity-parsers to i386-whitelist in groovy04:46
vorlonEickmeyer: well, inkscape/i386 is dep-wait on gtkmm3.0 now, and after adding gtkmm3.0 to the whitelist, it ftbfs on i386 with a source error that someone will need to investigate04:53
vorlonhttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtkmm3.0/3.24.2-1build1/+build/1926303604:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gtkmm3.0 to i386-whitelist in groovy05:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sugar-log-activity [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [42-1] (no packageset)05:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-initramfs-tools (eoan-proposed/main) [0.44ubuntu1 => 0.44ubuntu1.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)06:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-utils (eoan-proposed/main) [0.31-5-gef42f6b5-0ubuntu1 => 0.31-5-gef42f6b5-0ubuntu1.1] (core, edubuntu)07:02
sil2100Wimpress: hello! Could you create the stable/ubuntu-20.10 track for software-boutique? It's causing mate image builds to fail right now07:52
Laneysil2100: maybe try email, I pinged a few times about this already08:13
Laneyany idea about the studio failure btw?08:14
seb128sil2100, he's off work this week08:20
LocutusOfBorgplease somebody unblacklist ghc?08:32
xnoxLocutusOfBorg: why?08:52
xnoxi don't think we want 8.8.3 without debian unstable taking it08:53
xnoxwe are currently in sync with debian, are we not?08:53
sil2100seb128, Laney: ah, thanks o/08:54
sil2100hm08:55
LocutusOfBorgxnox, ghc blacklist also haskell libraries08:56
LocutusOfBorgof course I don't want to sync ghc itself08:56
LocutusOfBorgbut we didn't autosync haskell-hs-bibutils and that makes a transition never end08:57
xnoxsigh08:57
LocutusOfBorgI wish we had a way to blacklist only src:ghc syncs from experimental08:57
LocutusOfBorgI'm not sure how many haskell libraries we are missing08:58
xnoxthere is a way to run autosync script, to see why it chooses not to sync something i think.08:58
xnoxsuch that at least we can see what is skipped / ignored / blacklisted08:58
xnoxhttps://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/auto-sync/2020-05-05/05:00:03.log08:59
xnoxhm, reading that09:00
xnoxLaney:  sil2100: do you know what needs adding to make ^ understand riscv64 arch?09:01
Laneynot offhand09:06
Laneydo you know if that has any actual impact?09:06
xnoxLaney:  risc-only packages might not get synced, or some such? i.e. the way we don't sync things that _only_ build on alpha.09:09
xnoxno idea if there are any riscv64-only packages though, it might be just !riscv64? or ....... riscv64 in addition to the usual.09:10
LocutusOfBorgshouldn't we "just" upgrade dpkg-dev on the machine running auto-sync?09:16
LocutusOfBorge.g. if I run auto-sync on bionic, I don't get any error...09:19
LocutusOfBorgon trusty, dpkg in cputable is missing riscv6409:26
wgrantYeah, need to SRU that09:26
wgrantSame in xenial09:26
wgrantI forget if bionic hasit09:26
LocutusOfBorgriscv64riscv64riscv6464little09:27
LocutusOfBorg1.17.5ubuntu5.8 is fine in bionic yes09:28
Laneythat machine is running xenial09:28
LocutusOfBorgwgrant, 1.19.0.5ubuntu2.3 on bionic is fine09:29
LocutusOfBorgthanks Laney... time to upgrade? :)09:29
LaneyI think SRUing would be easier ...09:30
LocutusOfBorgwgrant, I would suggest to SRU ee0855cc66076691de4796be48f8a0d889fde001 and 544dd8967940aeee11b47b53a8df6f88110a9a16 ?09:37
wgrantLocutusOfBorg: I only did ee0855c, since 544dd89 is only needed for building binaries. https://launchpadlibrarian.net/472098869/dpkg_1.18.4ubuntu1_1.18.4ubuntu1.6+ppa1.diff.gz is the version that LP uses09:40
wgrantLocutusOfBorg: IIRC it's a backport of ee0855c except with the test arch count adjusted to match xenial's version09:40
wgranthttps://launchpad.net/~wgrant/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/11158536/+listing-archive-extra09:41
LocutusOfBorgok thanks10:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1052.57]10:16
=== paride9 is now known as paride
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: monitoring-plugins (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.2-3ubuntu2 => 2.2-3ubuntu3] (ubuntu-server)10:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (focal-proposed/main) [2.0.2 => 2.0.3] (core, i386-whitelist)11:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: monitoring-plugins (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.2-6build2 => 2.2-6ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)11:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: monitoring-plugins (focal-proposed/universe) [2.2-6ubuntu1 => 2.2-6ubuntu1.1] (no packageset)11:42
dokovorlon: is there a reason to b-d on the turbo-dev package? if yes, then b-d on libjpeg8-turbo-dev. the major difference is configuring with -DWITH_JPEG8=1. So you could rebase the packaging with the one from Debian and keep the 8 names, configure option, etc.11:43
ricotzdoko, hi, do you have an ETA for fixing gcc-10 in groovy-proposed?12:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1017.19~18.04.1] (no packageset)12:27
cpaelzerhi SRU team (sil2100, rbasak, ... ?) there is a setof changes in bionic-unapproved for a while - bug 1847361 packages libvirt/qemu12:34
ubot5bug 1847361 in qemu (Ubuntu Eoan) "Upgrade of qemu binaries causes running instances not able to dynamically load modules" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/184736112:34
cpaelzerso far I didn't mind that they wait until you had time, but now mdeslaur has some fixes in the queue he'd want to push as well12:34
cpaelzerany chance someone could get to revew the changes that are in -unapproved already?12:34
cpaelzerThe same is in eoan-unapproved12:35
=== kanashiro_ is now known as kanashiro
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gjs (focal-proposed/main) [1.64.1-2ubuntu1 => 1.64.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.1] (desktop-core, desktop-extra, i386-whitelist, mozilla)12:53
sil2100cpaelzer: hey! I can try looking into those today-ish o/12:54
cpaelzerthanks in advance sil210012:54
cpaelzerin case there are questions that come up let me know12:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: clamav (bionic-proposed/main) [0.102.2+dfsg-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 0.102.2+dfsg-0ubuntu0.18.04.2] (ubuntu-server)13:21
sil2100cpaelzer: I know this is quite a 'safe' change, but did you ask the security team's opinion on the libvirt apparmor changes?13:24
ahasenacksergiodj: see the clamav note above? Now we wait for the sru team to go through their queue and get to that package eventually13:34
sergiodjahasenack: ah, I see it!13:34
sergiodjcool13:34
sergiodjthanks for letting me know13:34
sil2100ahasenack: what series is that for?13:35
ahasenacksil2100: bionic13:35
cpaelzersil2100: yes we discussed it when we added it to focal13:35
sil2100cpaelzer: excellent13:35
Laneyubuntu-archive I just noticed a bunch of uploads in focal NEW that should probably be rejected, they are from pre-release13:36
cpaelzersil2100: for the auduit-trail the written part of it can be seen in https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+git/libvirt/+merge/38046913:37
cpaelzeraudit-trail13:37
sil2100Laney: oh, indeed!13:37
sil2100cpaelzer: thanks13:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected gnome-shell-extension-dashtodock [sync] (focal-proposed) [67+git20200225-1]13:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected libbpf [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.0.6-1]13:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected simde [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.0.0.git.20200415-1]13:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar-calculate-activity [sync] (focal-proposed) [46-1]13:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar-datastore [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.117-1]13:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar-jukebox-activity [sync] (focal-proposed) [36-1]13:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar-pippy-activity [sync] (focal-proposed) [75-1]13:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar-read-activity [sync] (focal-proposed) [123-1]13:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar-write-activity [sync] (focal-proposed) [100-1]13:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar [source] (focal-proposed) [0.117-2~build1]13:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected gnome-shell-extension-easyscreencast [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.1.0-1]13:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar-browse-activity [sync] (focal-proposed) [205-2]13:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar-imageviewer-activity [sync] (focal-proposed) [65-1]13:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar-read-activity [sync] (focal-proposed) [121-1]13:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar-write-activity [sync] (focal-proposed) [101-1]13:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected pulseaudio-dlna [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.5.3+git20200329-0.1]13:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar-memorize-activity [sync] (focal-proposed) [58-1]13:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected whipper [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.9.0-1]13:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar-chat-activity [sync] (focal-proposed) [86-1]13:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar-terminal-activity [sync] (focal-proposed) [47-1]13:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected dragonfly-reverb [source] (focal-proposed) [3.0.0-0ubuntu1]13:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sane-airscan [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.16-0ubuntu1]13:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:4.0+dfsg-0ubuntu9.5]13:52
tewardsil2100: around?13:53
sil2100teward: more-or-less, what's up?13:53
tewardneed a second set of eyes on an autopkgtest failure for piuparts... https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/amd64/p/piuparts/20200504_192251_db5e4@/log.gz AFAICT this is a debootstrap issue?13:53
teward(nginx triggered the test somehow? o.O)13:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (eoan-proposed) [5.4.0-0ubuntu5.3]13:54
tewardif this bug is as I think it is in piuparts and is going to hold up the tests then i'm going to have to file a high level bug against debootstrap with a pointer here.  (Either that or we need a hint to ignore those failures for now because it's a debootstrap bug)13:55
sil2100teward: so, I didn't dig into the log too deeply, but if the issue here is the error returned by debootstrap failing to recognise groovy, we have a new debootstrap in focal-proposed (and I see this ADT test pulled in the old one still) - so maybe it would make sense to re-run it with debootstrap/1.0.118ubuntu1.1 ?13:57
tewardrerun queued.  was debootstrap updated since yesterday and I missed it?13:58
sil2100No, the new debootstrap for focal is in focal-proposed since we started archive opening I guess, if that's what you mean13:58
tewardsil2100: then the error still exists and it's piuparts/autopkgtests at fault not pulling in that new debootstrap13:59
tewardsil2100: unless the autopkgtests are configured to also pull in proposed, then I have no control over that.13:59
tewardi reran the builds yesterday and they too failed again13:59
tewardso if debootstrap in proposed isn't getting pulled in this is a much larger bug in the testing infra13:59
tewardthis has been stuck since I SRU uploaded this days ago14:00
teward(i have ZERO idea why piuparts in proposed for focal-proposed is looking for groovy...)14:01
sil2100teward: well, I think it's per ADT design that we don't pull everything from -proposed if not requested explicitly14:02
tewardthen the piuparts autopkgtests need adjusted in focal accordingly14:03
sil2100(if the all-proposed flag is not set)14:03
tewardbecause *piuparts* is the test that's failing14:03
tewardand that's not one i touched14:03
tewardthe core problem is debootstrap that the piuparts test is pulling in is not pulling in from -proposed so fails14:03
teward(I get annoyed when the system starts pinging me about adt failures)14:04
Laneyany reason not to get debootstrap released?14:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.24]14:10
tewardthat's a sil2100 question :p14:10
sil2100Laney, teward: I'd be super happy with it, but it's my SRU so I can't release it. And no one else seems to like it, since it's verified but unreleased since a while14:11
tewardsil2100: it's locked by freeze14:11
tewardas is nginx14:11
sil2100teward: it's always locked by freeze, it's an SRU14:11
teward*shrugs*14:11
teward> no one else seems to like it14:11
Laneyapw: ^- fancy releasing debootstrap?14:11
sil2100SRUs are released manually, as always14:11
tewardi think it's a case of nobody doing anything :P14:11
sil2100;)14:12
apwLaney, in focal ?14:12
teward*blames all the release team for this*14:12
sil2100apw: all stable series o/14:12
sil2100Onegaishimasu14:12
sil2100I think there's a weird ADT failure on xenial, but I looked at it and commented on the bug14:13
apwsil2100, yeah i lean to your interpretation ... it is also a simple change, so ... i will release them14:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.0-1ubuntu8.16]14:14
Laneyw00t14:14
sil2100apw: thank you \o/14:14
apwLaney, gone  cc: sil2100 teward14:15
Laneyso I guess piuparts should go green soon14:18
tewardone would hope.  xz-utils is also impacted by the same failures (evidence piuparts' test doesn't pull proposed)14:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1017.19~18.04.1]14:30
vorlondoko: I don't know if there's a reason to depend on turbo-dev specifically; without any documentation about the jpeg library delta in Debian, it's difficult to navigate14:36
Eickmeyervorlon: Thanks for your info. Since inkscape is still dep-wait on i386 and FTBFS on riscv64, and since there's an ISO-killing dependency issue, I've removed it from the ubuntustudio seed for now to prevent the build failure.14:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1021.22] (core, kernel)15:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mailnag (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-1.1ubuntu2 => 1.2.1-1.1ubuntu2.1] (no packageset)15:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1021.22~18.04.1] (no packageset)15:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accountsservice (focal-proposed/main) [0.6.55-0ubuntu11 => 0.6.55-0ubuntu12~20.04.1] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop)16:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-1021.22]16:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1021.22~18.04.1]16:52
sil2100bdmurray: hey! Would you have some cycles today to take a look at our netplan SRUs? They're, as always, straight backports18:24
bdmurraysil2100: sure18:37
* Eickmeyer is once again trying to figure out why Ubuntu Studio's groovy iso failed, and can't blame Inkscape18:45
vorlonEickmeyer: I see there is now an ubuntustudio/groovy image build failure because something is trying to pull in python-chardet; I didn't realize ubuntustudio hadn't gotten rid of python2 in the focal cycle, is that going to be a goal for groovy?19:10
EickmeyerWell, now it has to be.19:10
EickmeyerWe lost a few important applications with Python2, but in one case it's the upstream author's fault.19:11
EickmeyerAs far as the dependency here, I don't know what's pulling that other than Inkscape, which I've removed from the seed temporarily.19:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (focal-proposed/main) [2:4.11.6+dfsg-0ubuntu1.1 => 2:4.11.6+dfsg-0ubuntu1.2] (core, i386-whitelist)19:17
Eickmeyervorlon: So, since I've removed inkscape from the seed, I don't know what it could be.19:19
Eickmeyervorlon: Could it be scribus? Scribus still depends on python2.7 in focal.19:25
EickmeyerSame in groovy.19:28
vorlonEickmeyer: an examination of the germinate output should show what's pulling it in19:35
vorlonEickmeyer: but also it could be that this particular build log is from before you dropped inkscape19:37
Eickmeyervorlon: I dropped inkscape several hours ago and the buildlog is from one hour ago. I think it's scribus pulling-in libpython2.7 which is pulling-in python-bs4 which is pulling-in python-charlib as a recommends.19:38
vorlonok19:38
vorlonbut the only reverse-dependency I see of python-bs4 I see in the archive is python-lxml19:39
vorlonEickmeyer: and inkscape in the archive still has the Task field19:41
vorlonEickmeyer: ubuntustudio-meta needs uploading, and migrating?19:41
EickmeyerDid that too.19:42
EickmeyerMaybe it didn't migrate in time?19:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.4-0ubuntu18.04.2 => 3.28.4+git20200505-0ubuntu20.04.1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop)19:42
EickmeyerIn the release pocket as of 3 hours ago.19:42
Eickmeyervorlon: ^19:43
vorlonEickmeyer: ubuntustudio-video 0.212 is the latest, and it recommends inkscape19:43
EickmeyerThere it is. Oof.19:43
EickmeyerI'm trying to figure out now why it's in video, but whatever. I'll remove it.19:43
Eickmeyervorlon: Thanks. I guess I overlooked that one.19:45
* Eickmeyer doesn't normally associate vector graphics with video19:45
Eickmeyervorlon: Are you able to manually try an ISO rebuild if I remind you in a couple hours? The ISO tracker won't let me right now since the first FTB.19:46
EickmeyerAnd, sorry for being such a pest. I just want to get the DE switch done asap to give it as much time as possible to work out bugs and configs.19:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.4-0ubuntu18.04.2 => 3.28.4+git20200505-0ubuntu18.04.1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop)19:52
vorlonEickmeyer: yep, happy to manually kick one off when the time comes20:01
bdmurrayvorlon: Is this group check necessary in focal? https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/hGMH3sJZ2X/20:15
vorlonbdmurray: well the libreoffice-l10n package doesn't exist post-disco, so I guess so20:18
Eickmeyervorlon: Looks like I've got a migrated meta. Would you be so kind as to kick a spin of Ubuntu Studio Groovy off for me?21:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (focal-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu3~20.04.1]21:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu3~19.10.1]22:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [s390x] (eoan-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~19.10.1] (core)22:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~19.10.1] (core)22:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [i386] (eoan-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~19.10.1] (core)22:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~19.10.1] (core)22:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [arm64] (eoan-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~19.10.1] (core)22:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [armhf] (eoan-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~19.10.1] (core)22:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu3~18.04.1]22:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~18.04.1] (core)22:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~18.04.1] (core)22:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~18.04.1] (core)22:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~18.04.1] (core)22:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~18.04.1] (core)22:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~18.04.1] (core)22:22
vorlonEickmeyer: running now22:31
Eickmeyervorlon: And failed. No inkscape, still broken.22:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.18 => 1:20.04.19] (core)22:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: varnish-modules [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.16.0-1] (no packageset)23:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: varnish-modules [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.16.0-1] (no packageset)23:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: varnish-modules [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.16.0-1] (no packageset)23:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: varnish-modules [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.16.0-1] (no packageset)23:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: varnish-modules [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.16.0-1] (no packageset)23:18
Eickmeyervorlon: I just ran germinate locally and python-chardet doesn't even show up in rdepends, so I really don't know what's going on now.23:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1011.11] (core, kernel)23:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-30.34] (core, kernel)23:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-30.34] (core, kernel)23:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1010.10] (core, kernel)23:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-30.34] (core, kernel)23:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1010.10] (core, kernel)23:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-30.34] (core, kernel)23:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: varnish-modules [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.16.0-1] (no packageset)23:43
Eickmeyervorlon: Figured it out. openshot is pulling in inkscape as a recommends. *insert why.gif here*23:48

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!