[00:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted svgtune [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.3.0-1]
[01:53] <Eickmeyer> Release team: As discussed above between myself and cjwatson, it appears as though inkscape (i386) needs a hint.
[01:53] <Eickmeyer> in groovy
[02:48] <teward> um, guys, I think piuparts and debootstrap are broken.
[02:48] <teward> https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/amd64/p/piuparts/20200504_192251_db5e4@/log.gz
[02:48] <teward> and yet it's trying to do focal autopkgtests
[02:48] <teward> this is holding up the nginx migration
[02:48] <teward> the four failures are, however, not nginx related.
[02:49] <teward> failure is the same error in all four piuparts nginx-triggered failures.
[02:50] <teward> so either that needs an exception or someone to fix piuparts.
[02:50] <teward> (or rather, debootstrap)
[04:16] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: it actually needs the build-deps sorted so they're built on i386; working on that
[04:19] <vorlon> wgrant, cjwatson: ok, gtkspell3 copy-package did create the i386 build record, so it seems that does work as intended now
[04:19] <wgrant> Great
[04:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed discount from i386-whitelist in groovy
[04:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed gogo from i386-whitelist in groovy
[04:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed ruby-did-you-mean from i386-whitelist in groovy
[04:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed ruby-json from i386-whitelist in groovy
[04:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed ruby-rdiscount from i386-whitelist in groovy
[04:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added apiguardian to i386-whitelist in groovy
[04:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gtkspell3 to i386-whitelist in groovy
[04:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added junit5 to i386-whitelist in groovy
[04:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added opentest4j to i386-whitelist in groovy
[04:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added univocity-parsers to i386-whitelist in groovy
[04:53] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: well, inkscape/i386 is dep-wait on gtkmm3.0 now, and after adding gtkmm3.0 to the whitelist, it ftbfs on i386 with a source error that someone will need to investigate
[04:53] <vorlon> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtkmm3.0/3.24.2-1build1/+build/19263036
[05:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gtkmm3.0 to i386-whitelist in groovy
[05:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sugar-log-activity [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [42-1] (no packageset)
[06:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-initramfs-tools (eoan-proposed/main) [0.44ubuntu1 => 0.44ubuntu1.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)
[07:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-utils (eoan-proposed/main) [0.31-5-gef42f6b5-0ubuntu1 => 0.31-5-gef42f6b5-0ubuntu1.1] (core, edubuntu)
[07:52] <sil2100> Wimpress: hello! Could you create the stable/ubuntu-20.10 track for software-boutique? It's causing mate image builds to fail right now
[08:13] <Laney> sil2100: maybe try email, I pinged a few times about this already
[08:14] <Laney> any idea about the studio failure btw?
[08:20] <seb128> sil2100, he's off work this week
[08:32] <LocutusOfBorg> please somebody unblacklist ghc?
[08:52] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg: why?
[08:53] <xnox> i don't think we want 8.8.3 without debian unstable taking it
[08:53] <xnox> we are currently in sync with debian, are we not?
[08:54] <sil2100> seb128, Laney: ah, thanks o/
[08:55] <sil2100> hm
[08:56] <LocutusOfBorg> xnox, ghc blacklist also haskell libraries
[08:56] <LocutusOfBorg> of course I don't want to sync ghc itself
[08:57] <LocutusOfBorg> but we didn't autosync haskell-hs-bibutils and that makes a transition never end
[08:57] <xnox> sigh
[08:57] <LocutusOfBorg> I wish we had a way to blacklist only src:ghc syncs from experimental
[08:58] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm not sure how many haskell libraries we are missing
[08:58] <xnox> there is a way to run autosync script, to see why it chooses not to sync something i think.
[08:58] <xnox> such that at least we can see what is skipped / ignored / blacklisted
[08:59] <xnox> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/auto-sync/2020-05-05/05:00:03.log
[09:00] <xnox> hm, reading that
[09:01] <xnox> Laney:  sil2100: do you know what needs adding to make ^ understand riscv64 arch?
[09:06] <Laney> not offhand
[09:06] <Laney> do you know if that has any actual impact?
[09:09] <xnox> Laney:  risc-only packages might not get synced, or some such? i.e. the way we don't sync things that _only_ build on alpha.
[09:10] <xnox> no idea if there are any riscv64-only packages though, it might be just !riscv64? or ....... riscv64 in addition to the usual.
[09:16] <LocutusOfBorg> shouldn't we "just" upgrade dpkg-dev on the machine running auto-sync?
[09:19] <LocutusOfBorg> e.g. if I run auto-sync on bionic, I don't get any error...
[09:26] <LocutusOfBorg> on trusty, dpkg in cputable is missing riscv64
[09:26] <wgrant> Yeah, need to SRU that
[09:26] <wgrant> Same in xenial
[09:26] <wgrant> I forget if bionic hasit
[09:27] <LocutusOfBorg> riscv64		riscv64		riscv64			64	little
[09:28] <LocutusOfBorg> 1.17.5ubuntu5.8 is fine in bionic yes
[09:28] <Laney> that machine is running xenial
[09:29] <LocutusOfBorg> wgrant, 1.19.0.5ubuntu2.3 on bionic is fine
[09:29] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks Laney... time to upgrade? :)
[09:30] <Laney> I think SRUing would be easier ...
[09:37] <LocutusOfBorg> wgrant, I would suggest to SRU ee0855cc66076691de4796be48f8a0d889fde001 and 544dd8967940aeee11b47b53a8df6f88110a9a16 ?
[09:40] <wgrant> LocutusOfBorg: I only did ee0855c, since 544dd89 is only needed for building binaries. https://launchpadlibrarian.net/472098869/dpkg_1.18.4ubuntu1_1.18.4ubuntu1.6+ppa1.diff.gz is the version that LP uses
[09:40] <wgrant> LocutusOfBorg: IIRC it's a backport of ee0855c except with the test arch count adjusted to match xenial's version
[09:41] <wgrant> https://launchpad.net/~wgrant/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/11158536/+listing-archive-extra
[10:11] <LocutusOfBorg> ok thanks
[10:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1052.57]
[10:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: monitoring-plugins (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.2-3ubuntu2 => 2.2-3ubuntu3] (ubuntu-server)
[11:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (focal-proposed/main) [2.0.2 => 2.0.3] (core, i386-whitelist)
[11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: monitoring-plugins (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.2-6build2 => 2.2-6ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: monitoring-plugins (focal-proposed/universe) [2.2-6ubuntu1 => 2.2-6ubuntu1.1] (no packageset)
[11:43] <doko> vorlon: is there a reason to b-d on the turbo-dev package? if yes, then b-d on libjpeg8-turbo-dev. the major difference is configuring with -DWITH_JPEG8=1. So you could rebase the packaging with the one from Debian and keep the 8 names, configure option, etc.
[12:03] <ricotz> doko, hi, do you have an ETA for fixing gcc-10 in groovy-proposed?
[12:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1017.19~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[12:34] <cpaelzer> hi SRU team (sil2100, rbasak, ... ?) there is a setof changes in bionic-unapproved for a while - bug 1847361 packages libvirt/qemu
[12:34] <cpaelzer> so far I didn't mind that they wait until you had time, but now mdeslaur has some fixes in the queue he'd want to push as well
[12:34] <cpaelzer> any chance someone could get to revew the changes that are in -unapproved already?
[12:35] <cpaelzer> The same is in eoan-unapproved
[12:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gjs (focal-proposed/main) [1.64.1-2ubuntu1 => 1.64.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.1] (desktop-core, desktop-extra, i386-whitelist, mozilla)
[12:54] <sil2100> cpaelzer: hey! I can try looking into those today-ish o/
[12:54] <cpaelzer> thanks in advance sil2100
[12:54] <cpaelzer> in case there are questions that come up let me know
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: clamav (bionic-proposed/main) [0.102.2+dfsg-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 0.102.2+dfsg-0ubuntu0.18.04.2] (ubuntu-server)
[13:24] <sil2100> cpaelzer: I know this is quite a 'safe' change, but did you ask the security team's opinion on the libvirt apparmor changes?
[13:34] <ahasenack> sergiodj: see the clamav note above? Now we wait for the sru team to go through their queue and get to that package eventually
[13:34] <sergiodj> ahasenack: ah, I see it!
[13:34] <sergiodj> cool
[13:34] <sergiodj> thanks for letting me know
[13:35] <sil2100> ahasenack: what series is that for?
[13:35] <ahasenack> sil2100: bionic
[13:35] <cpaelzer> sil2100: yes we discussed it when we added it to focal
[13:35] <sil2100> cpaelzer: excellent
[13:36] <Laney> ubuntu-archive I just noticed a bunch of uploads in focal NEW that should probably be rejected, they are from pre-release
[13:37] <cpaelzer> sil2100: for the auduit-trail the written part of it can be seen in https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+git/libvirt/+merge/380469
[13:37] <cpaelzer> audit-trail
[13:37] <sil2100> Laney: oh, indeed!
[13:37] <sil2100> cpaelzer: thanks
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected gnome-shell-extension-dashtodock [sync] (focal-proposed) [67+git20200225-1]
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected libbpf [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.0.6-1]
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected simde [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.0.0.git.20200415-1]
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar-calculate-activity [sync] (focal-proposed) [46-1]
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar-datastore [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.117-1]
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar-jukebox-activity [sync] (focal-proposed) [36-1]
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar-pippy-activity [sync] (focal-proposed) [75-1]
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar-read-activity [sync] (focal-proposed) [123-1]
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar-write-activity [sync] (focal-proposed) [100-1]
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar [source] (focal-proposed) [0.117-2~build1]
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected gnome-shell-extension-easyscreencast [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.1.0-1]
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar-browse-activity [sync] (focal-proposed) [205-2]
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar-imageviewer-activity [sync] (focal-proposed) [65-1]
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar-read-activity [sync] (focal-proposed) [121-1]
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar-write-activity [sync] (focal-proposed) [101-1]
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected pulseaudio-dlna [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.5.3+git20200329-0.1]
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar-memorize-activity [sync] (focal-proposed) [58-1]
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected whipper [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.9.0-1]
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar-chat-activity [sync] (focal-proposed) [86-1]
[13:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sugar-terminal-activity [sync] (focal-proposed) [47-1]
[13:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected dragonfly-reverb [source] (focal-proposed) [3.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[13:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sane-airscan [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.16-0ubuntu1]
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:4.0+dfsg-0ubuntu9.5]
[13:53] <teward> sil2100: around?
[13:53] <sil2100> teward: more-or-less, what's up?
[13:53] <teward> need a second set of eyes on an autopkgtest failure for piuparts... https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/amd64/p/piuparts/20200504_192251_db5e4@/log.gz AFAICT this is a debootstrap issue?
[13:54] <teward> (nginx triggered the test somehow? o.O)
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (eoan-proposed) [5.4.0-0ubuntu5.3]
[13:55] <teward> if this bug is as I think it is in piuparts and is going to hold up the tests then i'm going to have to file a high level bug against debootstrap with a pointer here.  (Either that or we need a hint to ignore those failures for now because it's a debootstrap bug)
[13:57] <sil2100> teward: so, I didn't dig into the log too deeply, but if the issue here is the error returned by debootstrap failing to recognise groovy, we have a new debootstrap in focal-proposed (and I see this ADT test pulled in the old one still) - so maybe it would make sense to re-run it with debootstrap/1.0.118ubuntu1.1 ?
[13:58] <teward> rerun queued.  was debootstrap updated since yesterday and I missed it?
[13:58] <sil2100> No, the new debootstrap for focal is in focal-proposed since we started archive opening I guess, if that's what you mean
[13:59] <teward> sil2100: then the error still exists and it's piuparts/autopkgtests at fault not pulling in that new debootstrap
[13:59] <teward> sil2100: unless the autopkgtests are configured to also pull in proposed, then I have no control over that.
[13:59] <teward> i reran the builds yesterday and they too failed again
[13:59] <teward> so if debootstrap in proposed isn't getting pulled in this is a much larger bug in the testing infra
[14:00] <teward> this has been stuck since I SRU uploaded this days ago
[14:01] <teward> (i have ZERO idea why piuparts in proposed for focal-proposed is looking for groovy...)
[14:02] <sil2100> teward: well, I think it's per ADT design that we don't pull everything from -proposed if not requested explicitly
[14:03] <teward> then the piuparts autopkgtests need adjusted in focal accordingly
[14:03] <sil2100> (if the all-proposed flag is not set)
[14:03] <teward> because *piuparts* is the test that's failing
[14:03] <teward> and that's not one i touched
[14:03] <teward> the core problem is debootstrap that the piuparts test is pulling in is not pulling in from -proposed so fails
[14:04] <teward> (I get annoyed when the system starts pinging me about adt failures)
[14:05] <Laney> any reason not to get debootstrap released?
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.24]
[14:10] <teward> that's a sil2100 question :p
[14:11] <sil2100> Laney, teward: I'd be super happy with it, but it's my SRU so I can't release it. And no one else seems to like it, since it's verified but unreleased since a while
[14:11] <teward> sil2100: it's locked by freeze
[14:11] <teward> as is nginx
[14:11] <sil2100> teward: it's always locked by freeze, it's an SRU
[14:11] <teward> *shrugs*
[14:11] <teward> > no one else seems to like it
[14:11] <Laney> apw: ^- fancy releasing debootstrap?
[14:11] <sil2100> SRUs are released manually, as always
[14:11] <teward> i think it's a case of nobody doing anything :P
[14:12] <sil2100> ;)
[14:12] <apw> Laney, in focal ?
[14:12] <teward> *blames all the release team for this*
[14:12] <sil2100> apw: all stable series o/
[14:12] <sil2100> Onegaishimasu
[14:13] <sil2100> I think there's a weird ADT failure on xenial, but I looked at it and commented on the bug
[14:14] <apw> sil2100, yeah i lean to your interpretation ... it is also a simple change, so ... i will release them
[14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.0-1ubuntu8.16]
[14:14] <Laney> w00t
[14:14] <sil2100> apw: thank you \o/
[14:15] <apw> Laney, gone  cc: sil2100 teward
[14:18] <Laney> so I guess piuparts should go green soon
[14:21] <teward> one would hope.  xz-utils is also impacted by the same failures (evidence piuparts' test doesn't pull proposed)
[14:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1017.19~18.04.1]
[14:36] <vorlon> doko: I don't know if there's a reason to depend on turbo-dev specifically; without any documentation about the jpeg library delta in Debian, it's difficult to navigate
[14:39] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Thanks for your info. Since inkscape is still dep-wait on i386 and FTBFS on riscv64, and since there's an ISO-killing dependency issue, I've removed it from the ubuntustudio seed for now to prevent the build failure.
[15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1021.22] (core, kernel)
[15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mailnag (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-1.1ubuntu2 => 1.2.1-1.1ubuntu2.1] (no packageset)
[15:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1021.22~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[16:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accountsservice (focal-proposed/main) [0.6.55-0ubuntu11 => 0.6.55-0ubuntu12~20.04.1] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-1021.22]
[16:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1021.22~18.04.1]
[18:24] <sil2100> bdmurray: hey! Would you have some cycles today to take a look at our netplan SRUs? They're, as always, straight backports
[18:37] <bdmurray> sil2100: sure
[18:45]  * Eickmeyer is once again trying to figure out why Ubuntu Studio's groovy iso failed, and can't blame Inkscape
[19:10] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: I see there is now an ubuntustudio/groovy image build failure because something is trying to pull in python-chardet; I didn't realize ubuntustudio hadn't gotten rid of python2 in the focal cycle, is that going to be a goal for groovy?
[19:10] <Eickmeyer> Well, now it has to be.
[19:11] <Eickmeyer> We lost a few important applications with Python2, but in one case it's the upstream author's fault.
[19:12] <Eickmeyer> As far as the dependency here, I don't know what's pulling that other than Inkscape, which I've removed from the seed temporarily.
[19:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (focal-proposed/main) [2:4.11.6+dfsg-0ubuntu1.1 => 2:4.11.6+dfsg-0ubuntu1.2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[19:19] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: So, since I've removed inkscape from the seed, I don't know what it could be.
[19:25] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Could it be scribus? Scribus still depends on python2.7 in focal.
[19:28] <Eickmeyer> Same in groovy.
[19:35] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: an examination of the germinate output should show what's pulling it in
[19:37] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: but also it could be that this particular build log is from before you dropped inkscape
[19:38] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: I dropped inkscape several hours ago and the buildlog is from one hour ago. I think it's scribus pulling-in libpython2.7 which is pulling-in python-bs4 which is pulling-in python-charlib as a recommends.
[19:38] <vorlon> ok
[19:39] <vorlon> but the only reverse-dependency I see of python-bs4 I see in the archive is python-lxml
[19:41] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: and inkscape in the archive still has the Task field
[19:41] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: ubuntustudio-meta needs uploading, and migrating?
[19:42] <Eickmeyer> Did that too.
[19:42] <Eickmeyer> Maybe it didn't migrate in time?
[19:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.4-0ubuntu18.04.2 => 3.28.4+git20200505-0ubuntu20.04.1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop)
[19:42] <Eickmeyer> In the release pocket as of 3 hours ago.
[19:43] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: ^
[19:43] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: ubuntustudio-video 0.212 is the latest, and it recommends inkscape
[19:43] <Eickmeyer> There it is. Oof.
[19:43] <Eickmeyer> I'm trying to figure out now why it's in video, but whatever. I'll remove it.
[19:45] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Thanks. I guess I overlooked that one.
[19:45]  * Eickmeyer doesn't normally associate vector graphics with video
[19:46] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Are you able to manually try an ISO rebuild if I remind you in a couple hours? The ISO tracker won't let me right now since the first FTB.
[19:49] <Eickmeyer> And, sorry for being such a pest. I just want to get the DE switch done asap to give it as much time as possible to work out bugs and configs.
[19:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.4-0ubuntu18.04.2 => 3.28.4+git20200505-0ubuntu18.04.1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop)
[20:01] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: yep, happy to manually kick one off when the time comes
[20:15] <bdmurray> vorlon: Is this group check necessary in focal? https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/hGMH3sJZ2X/
[20:18] <vorlon> bdmurray: well the libreoffice-l10n package doesn't exist post-disco, so I guess so
[21:33] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Looks like I've got a migrated meta. Would you be so kind as to kick a spin of Ubuntu Studio Groovy off for me?
[21:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (focal-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu3~20.04.1]
[22:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu3~19.10.1]
[22:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [s390x] (eoan-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~19.10.1] (core)
[22:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~19.10.1] (core)
[22:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [i386] (eoan-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~19.10.1] (core)
[22:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~19.10.1] (core)
[22:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [arm64] (eoan-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~19.10.1] (core)
[22:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [armhf] (eoan-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~19.10.1] (core)
[22:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu3~18.04.1]
[22:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~18.04.1] (core)
[22:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~18.04.1] (core)
[22:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~18.04.1] (core)
[22:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~18.04.1] (core)
[22:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~18.04.1] (core)
[22:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~18.04.1] (core)
[22:31] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: running now
[22:37] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: And failed. No inkscape, still broken.
[22:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.18 => 1:20.04.19] (core)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: varnish-modules [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.16.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: varnish-modules [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.16.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: varnish-modules [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.16.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: varnish-modules [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.16.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: varnish-modules [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.16.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:25] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: I just ran germinate locally and python-chardet doesn't even show up in rdepends, so I really don't know what's going on now.
[23:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1011.11] (core, kernel)
[23:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-30.34] (core, kernel)
[23:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-30.34] (core, kernel)
[23:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1010.10] (core, kernel)
[23:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-30.34] (core, kernel)
[23:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1010.10] (core, kernel)
[23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-30.34] (core, kernel)
[23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: varnish-modules [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.16.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:48] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Figured it out. openshot is pulling in inkscape as a recommends. *insert why.gif here*