| OvenWerks | matrix is gone? | 14:58 |
|---|---|---|
| Eickmeyer | No, Matrix isn't gone. Every now and then they reset the bridge. | 16:09 |
| Eickmeyer | OvenWerks: New icon for Studio Controls? https://www.svgrepo.com/svg/233175/circle-oval | 20:18 |
| Eickmeyer | Another idea: https://www.svgrepo.com/svg/8167/circles | 20:20 |
| OvenWerks | Eickmeyer: the first is too close to the ubuntustudio one I think... might lead to confusion | 20:29 |
| Eickmeyer | OvenWerks: That's why I saw the second one and thought it might work with a little tweaking. | 20:31 |
| Eickmeyer | They're CC0 so they don't even need credit. | 20:31 |
| OvenWerks | https://www.svgrepo.com/svg/8176/split-circle has both S and C if it was flipped upside down... | 20:34 |
| OvenWerks | However, you have better graphics skills than I do so feel free to use whatever seems to work. | 20:34 |
| OvenWerks | maybe it doesn't need to be flipped | 20:35 |
| Eickmeyer | I don't think it needs to be flipped. Just not a fan of the lime green, but that can be changed. | 20:35 |
| OvenWerks | of course there is the extra D (SCD?) | 20:36 |
| OvenWerks | :) | 20:36 |
| Eickmeyer | Studio Controls for Dummies? hahaha | 20:36 |
| OvenWerks | :) that is certainly where it started out. | 20:36 |
| Eickmeyer | Hahaha | 20:36 |
| OvenWerks | anyway, I need to get my wife out the door to work. | 20:37 |
| * OvenWerks has been working on adding a meter to the foldback bus | 20:37 | |
| Eickmeyer | Nice. :) | 20:38 |
| Eickmeyer | OvenWerks: I played with it and came up with this: | 20:40 |
| Eickmeyer | Uhhh... | 20:40 |
| * Eickmeyer[m] uploaded an image: g90.png (19KB) < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/YJRItJtVmDPVXVzKvlEWCxHX > | 20:43 | |
| Eickmeyer[m] | That. | 20:43 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | OvenWerks: ^ | 20:43 |
| Eickmeyer | OvenWerks: Unrelated, new upload of hexter just hit Debian. | 20:54 |
| OvenWerks | I'm fine with that | 21:22 |
| Eickmeyer | Cool. I'll get working on it. | 21:25 |
| Eickmeyer | OvenWerks: New icon is added. I've begun working on the actual, non-native packaging. How do you feel about using what we've got as a 1.99.0 release in preparation for a 2.0 release as studio-controls? | 21:47 |
| Eickmeyer | By release I mean tag? | 21:48 |
| Eickmeyer | 1.99 basically pre-release. | 21:48 |
| OvenWerks | sure | 21:52 |
| Eickmeyer | Ok. | 21:53 |
| OvenWerks | There are some things I would like to get out for G though on top of that. | 21:53 |
| OvenWerks | but having a release means it can be packaged | 21:53 |
| Eickmeyer | Well, sure. This just gives us a baseline to start. I made launchpad.net/studio-controls to be staging for the packaging. | 21:54 |
| OvenWerks | so like cadence... ubuntustudio-controls can't be used at the same time :) | 21:54 |
| Eickmeyer | Right, nothing in the debian/control file is changing in that regard. | 21:55 |
| OvenWerks | oh but it does need to be change to add conficts with ubuntustudio-controls | 21:55 |
| OvenWerks | or provides or replaces | 21:56 |
| Eickmeyer | Right. It will be Conflicts: ubuntustudio-controls <= whatever and then I'll upload a new ubuntustudio-controls as a transitional dummy package. | 21:56 |
| Eickmeyer | OvenWerks: Feel free to put all code/bugfixes in s-c on github. Any fixes will land in s-c. | 22:21 |
| Eickmeyer | teward: "new" package at https://launchpad.net/studio-controls. Literally replaces ubuntustudio-controls as an unbranded, cross-distro application. | 22:22 |
| teward | if it replaces do you have a migration plan to switch ubuntustudio-controls -> studio-controls (i.e. metapackage) | 22:22 |
| Eickmeyer | Yes, all ready to go. studio-controls needs to land first for obvious reasons. | 22:23 |
| OvenWerks | Eickmeyer: right, That was my plan anyway... but it will be after Ardour 6.0 Or at least RC2 I think. | 23:16 |
| Eickmeyer | OvenWerks: Sounds good, which means my timing on getting this transition going is right. | 23:17 |
| Eickmeyer | I just don't want you to have to put code in two different places. | 23:17 |
| OvenWerks | :) | 23:51 |
| OvenWerks | Foldback meter: http://www.ovenwerks.net/paste/foldbackmeter.png | 23:51 |
| OvenWerks | I am realizing it is the only horizontal meter in Ardour.... so I am getting prepared to be told to make it vertical :) | 23:52 |
| Eickmeyer | OMG... if I had a nickel for every console that had vertical meters but also had one horizontal meter, I'd be a rich man. | 23:53 |
| Eickmeyer | Their argument is invalid. | 23:53 |
| Eickmeyer | That said, looks good. | 23:54 |
| OvenWerks | It's not my toy and Ben has a lot to say about it too cause it lands in MB. | 23:54 |
| Eickmeyer | Yeah, that's fair. | 23:54 |
| OvenWerks | Vertical would mean the level knob would be offset probably | 23:54 |
| OvenWerks | My original reasoning was that the reason people wanted the plugin box bigger was because they wanted to put an inline meter in there which would be horizontal... | 23:55 |
| Eickmeyer | Yeah, that might look a little funny, but I guess it's not your call. | 23:56 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
