[00:41] <kc2bez> @tsimonq2 should your timers start at 0? https://phab.lubuntu.me/source/ci-tooling/browse/master/ci/lp_check.py$61
[00:41] <tsimonq2> kc2bez: Yes.
[00:42] <tsimonq2> The upgrade to 20.04 for Phab is almost done.
[00:47] <tsimonq2> There we are.
[00:47] <tsimonq2> https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_unstable_qterminal/20/console
[00:47] <tsimonq2> Let's see if this works/
[00:47] <tsimonq2> It'll probably take 20-30 minutes because of the LP publisher.
[00:54] <tsimonq2> Once that's working and all of the packages are Lintian clean, I'll consider 0.15.0 ready for upload.
 @tsimonq2 [<tsimonq2> Once that's working and all of the packages are Lintian clean, I'll c …], for 20.10 or 20.04? :P
[00:55] <tsimonq2> Actually, I'm thinking about both.
 @tsimonq2 [<tsimonq2> Actually, I'm thinking about both.], ok
[00:55] <tsimonq2> 20.10 has to be first though.
[00:58] <tsimonq2> I'll be going AFK for about 30 mins to an hour.
[00:59] <tsimonq2> When I get back, I'll check if the dust has settled.
[00:59] <tsimonq2> I also did the first Britney run in a while, so unstable-ci and stable-ci release pockets will see new packages.
 what'd you break
 (also: support tickets!)
 oh i see what you did you broke LXD on that server
 congrats
 *smacks tsimonq2*
 @tsimonq2 CI is in the process of starting up again.  Rebooting after whatever you did torpedoed LXD
 so it's Your Fault
 CI is in the process of restarting though
 Nice
 @guiverc Tested for the calamares bug 1871877733 today with a failure -added comments to your bug report
 @guiverc intend to look at it again in a day or 2..
[07:19] <guiverc> thanks, mine were all good today, but i'm only using sudo -E cala.. -d now  ; i think it's random(timing) so I'll hopefully get verbose reporting with the issue eventually  (fingers crossed anyway)
[07:19]  * guiverc wonders if it's always good with debugging verbose; we have a work-around by making that default anyway :)
 @guiverc funny I was actually thinking that when  got the fail-it that works why not use it?
[07:34] <guiverc> is lp 1878336 against correct package?  or should it be pcmanfm-qt?  I'm out of time today, but I'll endeavour to give that a test on debian-bullseye tomorrow maybe & if issues there & someone agrees, I'll file upstream (I don't see any issues on https://github.com/lxqt/pcmanfm-qt/issues?page=2&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen - but am I missing anything?
 guiverc yes you should link the bug with pcmanfm-qt
[07:47] <guiverc> thanks @aptghetto
 Thanks for testing and triaging
[08:55] <guiverc> thanks aptghetto :)  and for all your work too !
[17:00] <apt-ghetto> teward: Regarding your change in ci/jobgenerator.py on line 134 from https://phab.lubuntu.me/rCIf7e731faaed830d279095cab16db69fcadd0ca46 why is `if data is not None` better than `if data`? Isn't it possible to pass a boolean or empty list or empty string?
[17:02] <teward> apt-ghetto: you could but then you get an indexerror with references.  given the way Simon wrote this out I assume thst this is JSON data but as I init the thing as None as I did then its still None.
[17:03] <teward> theres a few ways to achieve the same goal but as data is init as None anyways... :P
[17:04] <apt-ghetto> As far as I understand, data is set to None only if you don't pass a second parameter
[18:03] <apt-ghetto> tsimonq2: I cannot `git push origin ci/unstable`, bug or new feature?
[20:56] <teward> apt-ghetto theres ways to do it but the way we are extracting data only works for dicts.
[20:56] <teward> so anyting else is invaluf
[20:56] <teward> invalid*,