[00:41] @tsimonq2 should your timers start at 0? https://phab.lubuntu.me/source/ci-tooling/browse/master/ci/lp_check.py$61 [00:41] kc2bez: Yes. [00:42] The upgrade to 20.04 for Phab is almost done. [00:47] There we are. [00:47] https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_unstable_qterminal/20/console [00:47] Let's see if this works/ [00:47] It'll probably take 20-30 minutes because of the LP publisher. [00:54] Once that's working and all of the packages are Lintian clean, I'll consider 0.15.0 ready for upload. [00:55] @tsimonq2 [ Once that's working and all of the packages are Lintian clean, I'll c …], for 20.10 or 20.04? :P [00:55] Actually, I'm thinking about both. [00:55] @tsimonq2 [ Actually, I'm thinking about both.], ok [00:55] 20.10 has to be first though. [00:58] I'll be going AFK for about 30 mins to an hour. [00:59] When I get back, I'll check if the dust has settled. [00:59] I also did the first Britney run in a while, so unstable-ci and stable-ci release pockets will see new packages. [02:30] what'd you break [02:30] (also: support tickets!) [02:33] oh i see what you did you broke LXD on that server [02:33] congrats [02:33] *smacks tsimonq2* [02:35] @tsimonq2 CI is in the process of starting up again. Rebooting after whatever you did torpedoed LXD [02:35] so it's Your Fault [02:36] CI is in the process of restarting though [02:38] Nice [07:17] @guiverc Tested for the calamares bug 1871877733 today with a failure -added comments to your bug report [07:18] @guiverc intend to look at it again in a day or 2.. [07:19] thanks, mine were all good today, but i'm only using sudo -E cala.. -d now ; i think it's random(timing) so I'll hopefully get verbose reporting with the issue eventually (fingers crossed anyway) [07:19] * guiverc wonders if it's always good with debugging verbose; we have a work-around by making that default anyway :) [07:20] @guiverc funny I was actually thinking that when got the fail-it that works why not use it? [07:34] is lp 1878336 against correct package? or should it be pcmanfm-qt? I'm out of time today, but I'll endeavour to give that a test on debian-bullseye tomorrow maybe & if issues there & someone agrees, I'll file upstream (I don't see any issues on https://github.com/lxqt/pcmanfm-qt/issues?page=2&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen - but am I missing anything? [07:34] Launchpad bug 1878336 in lubuntu-default-settings (Ubuntu) "the pcmanfm-qt crashes on an inexistant image background" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1878336 [07:46] guiverc yes you should link the bug with pcmanfm-qt [07:47] thanks @aptghetto [07:48] Thanks for testing and triaging [08:55] thanks aptghetto :) and for all your work too ! [17:00] teward: Regarding your change in ci/jobgenerator.py on line 134 from https://phab.lubuntu.me/rCIf7e731faaed830d279095cab16db69fcadd0ca46 why is `if data is not None` better than `if data`? Isn't it possible to pass a boolean or empty list or empty string? [17:02] apt-ghetto: you could but then you get an indexerror with references. given the way Simon wrote this out I assume thst this is JSON data but as I init the thing as None as I did then its still None. [17:03] theres a few ways to achieve the same goal but as data is init as None anyways... :P [17:04] As far as I understand, data is set to None only if you don't pass a second parameter [18:03] tsimonq2: I cannot `git push origin ci/unstable`, bug or new feature? [20:56] apt-ghetto theres ways to do it but the way we are extracting data only works for dicts. [20:56] so anyting else is invaluf [20:56] invalid*,