[00:01] <RAOF> Eickmeyer: I know it's preexisting, but that postinst looks suspicious. Unconditionally deleting configuration files seems bad?
[00:02] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: That service file is meant for non-Ubuntu distros, such as Fedora.
[00:03] <RAOF> Are we both talking about `/etc/xdg/autostart/autojack.desktop`?
[00:03] <RAOF> Because that's a configuration file you're deleting in postinst.
[00:04] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: Oh, no. That has to be deleted because we don't want it running in xdg/autostart, but rather as a user systemd service.
[00:04] <tumbleweed> ah, that dbus issue is part of Ubuntu's dbus delta
[00:04] <RAOF> (Deleting `/lib/systemd/system/studio-system.service` in the postinst *also* seems suspicious, but is at least not in an usually-preserved path)
[00:06] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: so why is that file present such that it needs to be deleted in postinst?
[00:06] <RAOF> Eickmeyer: Why might that file exist in `xdg/autostart`?
[00:06] <Eickmeyer> Previous versions of Ubuntu Studio had it.
[00:06] <Eickmeyer> er... ubuntustudio-controls.
[00:06] <Eickmeyer> And it wasn't autodeleting during upgrade.
[00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-horde-mail-autoconfig [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.3-6]
[00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-horde-pack [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.7-5]
[00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-horde-timezone [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.1.0-5]
[00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-horde-vfs [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.4.0-5]
[00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-horde-mime-viewer [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.2.2+debian0-1]
[00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-horde-tree [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.0.5-5]
[00:07] <RAOF> Eickmeyer: https://manpages.debian.org/wheezy/dpkg/dpkg-maintscript-helper.1.en.html
[00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-horde-smtp [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.9.5-5]
[00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-horde-xml-element [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.0.4-7]
[00:07] <vorlon> right
[00:07] <vorlon> should be using dh_maintscript for this, not a hard-coded delet
[00:07] <vorlon> e
[00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-horde-editor [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.0.5+debian0-4]
[00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-horde-itip [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.2-6]
[00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-horde-queue [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.1.5-5]
[00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-horde-routes [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.0.5-7]
[00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-horde-socket-client [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.2-3]
[00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-horde-text-diff [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.2.0-5]
[00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-horde-http [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.7-5]
[00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-horde-rdo [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.0-5]
[00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-horde-spellchecker [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.3-7]
[00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-horde-listheaders [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.2.5-5]
[00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-horde-rpc [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.8-5]
[00:08] <RAOF> Likewise, why would `/lib/systemd/system/studio-system.service` exist?
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-horde-argv [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.0-5]
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-horde-date-parser [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.0.6-5]
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volk [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.3.0-2]
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volk [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [2.3.0-2]
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volk [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [2.3.0-2]
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-horde-crypt [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.7.12-3]
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volk [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2.3.0-2]
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volk [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [2.3.0-2]
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-horde-image [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.6.0-2]
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volk [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [2.3.0-2]
[00:09] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: In other distributions, ondemand.service does not exist. That service file is required every boot for studio-controls to function.
[00:09] <Eickmeyer> ondemand.service is an Ubuntu-only thing.
[00:11] <RAOF> But why are you manually `rm`ing `studio-system.service` in the postinst?
[00:12] <Eickmeyer> To prevent people from enabling it. I could not convince the developer that it can exist without doing anything.
[00:12] <Eickmeyer> Mostly to make him happy.
[00:12] <xnox> RAOF:  Eickmeyer: what package are you discussing? i'm curious to review it.
[00:13] <Eickmeyer> xnox: studio-controls, it's identical to ubuntustudio-controls, but we're de-ubuntuifying it and making it distro-agnostic.
[00:13] <Eickmeyer> So, it's literally a file rename of what already exists.
[00:14] <xnox> ok
[00:14] <RAOF> And hence has the good fortune to be subject to AA review 😉
[00:14] <xnox> Eickmeyer:  why are you de-ubuntuifying it?
[00:14] <xnox> Eickmeyer:  are you..... leaving us?
[00:14] <Eickmeyer> xnox: I'
[00:14] <Eickmeyer> oops
[00:15] <Eickmeyer> xnox: I'm not leaving, but other distros want the tool. I also lead Fedora Jam.
[00:15] <Eickmeyer> And my developer, Len Ovens (OvenWerks) doesn't want to have to develop in two places, and I don't blame him.
[00:16] <xnox> i see. cool.
[00:16] <RAOF> Yeah, it's perfectly reasonable to change it from a native to a real upstream package.
[00:17] <RAOF> But I still don't see why the Ubuntu postinst has “#Remove systemd service file for non-Ubuntu systems” :)
[00:17] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: Because the functionality already exists in lib/systemd/ondemand.service.d
[00:18] <Eickmeyer> There's a studio.conf file there that does the same thing.
[00:18] <Eickmeyer> We wouldn't want that function to double-up, causing two processes to start.
[00:19] <RAOF> Oh! You mean to say that the package *installs* `/lib/systemd/system/studio-system.service` and then you delete it in the postinst?
[00:19] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: Correct.
[00:19] <RAOF> Um, no.
[00:19] <RAOF> Just don't install it in the package!
[00:20] <Eickmeyer> I tried that, and debhelper threw an error, iirc.
[00:21] <Eickmeyer> But, I suppose I might be able to manipulate studio-controls.install.
[00:21] <RAOF> `dh_missing` may have warned about upstream files existing but not being installed?
[00:21] <Eickmeyer> Yes, I think I remember that.
[00:21] <RAOF> If so, `debian/not-installed` is the file you want to list them in.
[00:22] <xnox> Eickmeyer:  we have many packages that install only a subset of things.
[00:22] <xnox> based on distro
[00:22] <xnox> e.g. cloud-init
[00:22] <xnox> (a very versatile per-distro thing)
[00:23] <Eickmeyer> This also may have been when the package was native.
[00:23] <RAOF> There seems to be even less for a native package to install a file, only to delete it in its own postinst :)
[00:24] <RAOF> s/less/less reason/
[00:24]  * Eickmeyer feels as though he's about to get hit upside the head with a Nack
[00:27] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: I've made the changes, including the maintscript, changed debian/studio-controls.install to not install studio-system.service, and added not-installed to list that file.
[00:29] <RAOF> Sounds good. I'll reject what's there and the new upload a review?
[00:29] <Eickmeyer> Yeah, sounds good.
[00:29] <Eickmeyer> teward: ^
[00:30] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: https://launchpad.net/studio-controls is where it's located, FYI.
[00:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected studio-controls [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.99.1-0ubuntu1]
[00:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: keystone (focal-proposed/main) [2:17.0.0~b3~git2020041013.7bb6314e4-0ubuntu1 => 2:17.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[00:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: heat (focal-proposed/main) [1:14.0.0~b3~git2020041012.2ef9f4bf3-0ubuntu1 => 1:14.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[01:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: designate (focal-proposed/main) [1:10.0.0~b3~git2020041012.9ed2623a-0ubuntu1 => 1:10.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[01:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (focal-proposed/main) [2:16.0.0~b3~git2020041516.5f42488a9a-0ubuntu2 => 2:16.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[01:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: studio-controls (groovy-proposed/primary) [1.99.1-0ubuntu1]
[01:18] <teward> RAOF: studio-controls now in New should meet with better approval
[01:19] <RAOF> Ta. I'll get onto that next.
[05:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vlfeat [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.9.21+dfsg0-6ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[05:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vlfeat [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.9.21+dfsg0-6ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[05:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vlfeat [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.9.21+dfsg0-6ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[05:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vlfeat [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.9.21+dfsg0-6ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[05:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vlfeat [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.9.21+dfsg0-6ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[05:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted studio-controls [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.99.1-0ubuntu1]
[05:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: studio-controls [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.99.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[05:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssh (xenial-proposed/main) [1:7.2p2-4ubuntu2.9 => 1:7.2p2-4ubuntu2.10] (core)
[06:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vlfeat [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.9.21+dfsg0-6ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted studio-controls [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.99.1-0ubuntu1]
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vlfeat [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.9.21+dfsg0-6ubuntu1]
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vlfeat [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.9.21+dfsg0-6ubuntu1]
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vlfeat [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.9.21+dfsg0-6ubuntu1]
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vlfeat [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.9.21+dfsg0-6ubuntu1]
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vlfeat [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [0.9.21+dfsg0-6ubuntu1]
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vlfeat [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.9.21+dfsg0-6ubuntu1]
[10:11] <mitya57> Can someone please reject tilda in focal SRU queue? Then I will upload a version with a different changelog entry, addressing bdmurray's comment.
[10:14] <sil2100> RikMills: hey! You around?
[10:18] <sil2100> RikMills: I'm looking at the plasma SRUs right now, and just wanted to make sure this is not an error - for two packages already I saw that debian/control has been modified and some dependencies being changed from >= 4:5.18.4.1~ to >= 4:5.18.4~ (for example the libkf5sysguard-dev dependency in plasma-vault)
[10:18] <sil2100> RikMills: it's weird that the dependency is now smaller, is this intentional, or a typo for something that was supposed to be 4:5.18.5~ ?
[10:18] <sil2100> Since this is .5 basically
[10:23] <sil2100> mitya57: done
[10:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tilda [source] (focal-proposed) [1.5.2-0ubuntu1]
[10:24] <RikMills> sil2100: sorta intentional or sorta not. let me explain. the packaging was taken from 5.18.5 in groovy where the interneral stack build deps were bumped from 5.18.4.1 to 5.18.5, where I then lowered some in debian/control to allow things to build sice we are not doing the whole stack for the SRU. in this case I forgot that Plasma people made a snafu so had to release 5.18.4.1 so just pout 5.18.4. In the end it doesn't matter at all as
[10:24] <RikMills> the build deps in the archive are fine, but that is why
[10:25] <mitya57> sil2100: thanks!
[10:25]  * RikMills glares at mistypes
[10:32] <sil2100> RikMills: ok, so what's important is that those that were downgraded to .4 from .4.1 don't really require .5 - thanks!
[10:33] <RikMills> sil2100: yep. exactly.
[10:37] <sil2100> Ok, was also worried about the new build requirement of KF5 CoreAddons in plasma-browser-integration without a new build-dep, but then I see almost all libkf5*-dev packages actually pull it in ;p
[10:42] <RikMills> sil2100: yes, much of kf5 frameworks is like that. I should probably add it explicitly though. I'll do that in groovy packaging
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted drkonqi [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.18.5-0ubuntu0.1]
[10:44] <sil2100> RikMills: thanks o/
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kinfocenter [sync] (focal-proposed) [4:5.18.5-0ubuntu0.1]
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kwin [sync] (focal-proposed) [4:5.18.5-0ubuntu0.1]
[10:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted milou [sync] (focal-proposed) [4:5.18.5-0ubuntu0.1]
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plasma-browser-integration [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.18.5-0ubuntu0.1]
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plasma-desktop [sync] (focal-proposed) [4:5.18.5-0ubuntu0.1]
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plasma-discover [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.18.5-0ubuntu0.1]
[10:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plasma-pa [sync] (focal-proposed) [4:5.18.5-0ubuntu0.1]
[10:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plasma-vault [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.18.5-0ubuntu0.1]
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plasma-workspace [sync] (focal-proposed) [4:5.18.5-0ubuntu0.1]
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xdg-desktop-portal-kde [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.18.5-0ubuntu0.1]
[10:49] <RikMills> \o/
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected live-build [source] (focal-proposed) [3.0~a57-1ubuntu38.1]
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (bionic-proposed/main) [1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.24 => 1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.25] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[10:54] <cpaelzer> the qemu that showed up in bionic-unapproved fixes an issue in an ongoing SRU verification
[10:55] <cpaelzer> the actual change vs what is already reviewed and in -proposed comes down to just https://git.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/qemu/commit/?id=47a2da2f474b81bb2ba033b9facf21c16194e3eb
[10:55] <cpaelzer> sil2100: you did the initial accept - since this is also blockign some coming CVE fixes I wante to ask if you (or someone else of the SRU Team) could check and accept that qemu
[10:56] <cpaelzer> it also builds quite some time, so accepting it soon would allow to re-verify it today
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected sbuild-launchpad-chroot [source] (focal-proposed) [0.16ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[10:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected sbuild-launchpad-chroot [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.15ubuntu0.19.04.1]
[11:01] <sil2100> cpaelzer: ok, looking good o/
[11:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.25]
[11:07] <cpaelzer> thank you
[11:08] <rbalint> ddstreet, true qemu is not found on arm64, i've updated LP: #1684588 with ppc64el finding it now
[11:09] <rbalint> Laney, systemd/ppc64el still times out :-(, is there anything else to make the change to adding it to long_tests take effect?
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tinyxml2 [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.0.0+dfsg-2] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tinyxml2 [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.0.0+dfsg-2] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tinyxml2 [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.0.0+dfsg-2] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tinyxml2 [i386] (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.0.0+dfsg-2] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[11:18] <rbalint> Laney, ahh, it  is bos02, not bos01
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tinyxml2 [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.0.0+dfsg-2] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tinyxml2 [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.0.0+dfsg-2] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[11:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tinyxml2 [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.0.0+dfsg-2] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[11:34] <Laney> ah
[11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tilda (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5.0-1.1 => 1.5.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate)
[11:34] <rbalint> Laney, fixing it ...
[11:35] <Laney> yeah forgot we had separate configs there
[11:35] <Laney> annoying system
[11:35] <rbalint> Laney, agreed :-)
[11:36] <Laney> it's going to be gone with the New Deployment®™Ⓒ
[11:36] <Laney> that looks more like https://git.launchpad.net/autopkgtest-cloud/tree/mojo/service-bundle?h=wip/mojo-juju-2
[11:38] <rbalint> Laney, could you please update the config? https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/+merge/383943
[11:38] <rbalint> ddstreet, Laney ^ sneaking systemd-upstream in
[11:40] <ddstreet> sweet!
[11:40] <Laney> rbalint: it needs to be in both configs
[11:40] <rbalint> Laney, ah, even more confusing, fixing it
[11:41] <Laney> we have two cloud regions that can run ppc64el tests
[11:41] <Laney> not sure if systemd-upstream will work there
[11:41] <Laney> rbalint: also  long_test not big?
[11:42] <rbalint> Laney, i'd like to try in on big, to see the gain, it runs qemu
[11:43] <Laney> what gain?
[11:43] <Laney> big reduces the capacity available for all other tests
[11:43] <Laney> and we frequently get many systemd tests running at once
[11:45] <Laney> (yeah systemd-upstream should work there I think)
[11:45] <rbalint> Laney, i thought ppc64el was doing relatively well regarding capacity
[11:46] <rbalint> Laney, also the shorter run time may make up for some of the kept resources
[11:47] <rbalint> Laney, we can revert to long if big makes too much trouble
[11:47] <rbalint> Laney, i think it would make sense to give it a try
[11:49] <rbalint> Laney,'ve updated the mr
[13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rabbitmq-server [source] (focal-proposed) [3.8.2-0ubuntu1.1]
[13:23] <Laney> rbalint: sorry went to lunch. m1.large uses 5 1/3 × as much RAM and 4 × as many vCPUs as the autopkgtest policy and so I don't really want to do this 'on spec' without more consideration
[13:23] <Laney> I'll give you long_tests for now
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rabbitmq-server [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.6.10-1ubuntu0.2]
[13:25] <rbalint> Laney, please check the comments on ddstreet's previous mr, it seems vorlon finally approved the big change
[13:26] <Laney> which one is that?
[13:26] <rbalint> Laney, https://code.launchpad.net/~ddstreet/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/+merge/369620/comments/974133
[13:26] <rbalint> Laney, also linked from current mr
[13:31] <Laney> thanks, I'll refer to my previous arguments then
[13:31] <Laney> basically that if we want to do this, we need to work on improving our own support
[13:32] <rbalint> Laney, is there a bug/ticket to track that?\
[13:33] <rbalint> Laney, also trying and reverting does not seem too much hassle if it turns out to be too heavy on the infra
[13:38] <Laney> rbalint: There's https://bugs.launchpad.net/auto-package-testing/+bug/1654761 for at least part of it
[13:38] <Laney> I think we're missing a bug for 'limit the number of concurrent big tests'
[13:41] <rbalint> Laney, ok, thanks for merging the long bump, i'm opening a new mr for 'big' to let the discussion be documented around the change
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rabbitmq-server [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.5.7-1ubuntu0.16.04.3]
[13:42] <Laney> FYI I killed the current systemd/groovy/ppc64el run
[13:43] <Laney> it sneaked in before I had deployed the change
[13:43] <Laney> should restart in a few minutes
[13:49] <rbalint> Laney, ok, thanks
[13:49] <rbalint> Laney, i've filed the new mr and invited you, too, to the review/discussion
[14:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: barbican (focal-proposed/main) [1:10.0.0~b2~git2020020508.7b14d983-0ubuntu3 => 1:10.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[15:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceilometer (focal-proposed/main) [1:14.0.0~b3~git2020041012.75b9d4e9-0ubuntu1 => 1:14.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ironic-inspector (focal-proposed/universe) [1:10.0.1~git2020041316.14b425e-0ubuntu1 => 1:10.1.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (no packageset)
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: magnum (focal-proposed/universe) [10.0.0~b3~git2020041013.01629398-0ubuntu1 => 10.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (no packageset)
[16:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: manila (focal-proposed/universe) [1:10.0.0~b3~git2020041013.ea90fd17-0ubuntu1 => 1:10.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (openstack)
[16:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: masakari-monitors (focal-proposed/main) [9.0.0~b3~git2020041013.e225e6d-0ubuntu1 => 9.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (no packageset)
[16:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: panko (focal-proposed/universe) [7.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 8.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (no packageset)
[16:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zaqar (focal-proposed/universe) [10.0.0~b3~git2020041014.22c457a5-0ubuntu1 => 10.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] (no packageset)
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: masakari (focal-proposed/main) [9.0.0~b3~git2020041013.94ec959-0ubuntu1 => 9.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-os-ken (focal-proposed/main) [1.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.0.0-0ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-server)
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.service (focal-proposed/main) [2.1.1-0ubuntu1 => 2.1.1-0ubuntu1.1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: networking-bagpipe (focal-proposed/universe) [12.0.0~b3~git2020041013.c15d5e0-0ubuntu1 => 12.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (no packageset)
[18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: networking-bgpvpn (focal-proposed/universe) [12.0.0~b3~git2020032545.9dcd5ed-0ubuntu1 => 12.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (no packageset)
[18:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: networking-hyperv (focal-proposed/universe) [1:7.3.2~git2020021315.1b1ee11-0ubuntu1 => 1:8.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (no packageset)
[18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: networking-odl (focal-proposed/universe) [1:16.0.0~b3~git2020032509.3de47a829-0ubuntu1 => 1:16.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (no packageset)
[18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron-fwaas (focal-proposed/main) [1:16.0.0~b3~git2020032402.5e6c04885-0ubuntu1 => 1:16.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron-dynamic-routing (focal-proposed/universe) [2:16.0.0~b3~git2020041013.045811b-0ubuntu1 => 2:16.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (no packageset)
[18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron-vpnaas (focal-proposed/main) [2:16.0.0~b3~git2020041013.358d35202-0ubuntu1 => 2:16.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[19:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg-server-hwe-18.04 (bionic-proposed/main) [2:1.20.5+git20191008-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 2:1.20.8-2ubuntu2~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[19:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: networking-sfc (focal-proposed/universe) [10.0.0~b3~git2020032510.8417568-0ubuntu1 => 10.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (no packageset)
[19:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: placement (focal-proposed/main) [3.0.0~b3~git2020041014.0f90d197-0ubuntu1 => 3.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (no packageset)
[19:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: octavia (focal-proposed/universe) [6.0.0~b3~git2020041014.771a5d87-0ubuntu1 => 6.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (no packageset)
[19:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mesa (bionic-proposed/main) [19.2.8-0ubuntu0~18.04.3 => 20.0.4-2ubuntu1~18.04.1] (core, xorg)
[19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: swift (focal-proposed/main) [2.24.1~git2020041316.a495f1e32-0ubuntu1 => 2.25.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (openstack)
[19:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (bionic-proposed/main) [237-3ubuntu10.40 => 237-3ubuntu10.41] (core)
[19:56] <ddstreet> tjaalton when you get in tomorrow, for your ~ubuntu-sru shift, would be great if you could accept this systemd upload ^ has an urgent patch.  thanks!
[19:57] <ddstreet> or bdmurray or vorlon if you happen to have sru review time today ^
[20:03] <bdmurray> ddstreet: I reviewed some of this already right?
[20:03] <ddstreet> bdmurray some of it was in the upload for focal, yes (and there is also an upload in eoan with some)
[20:04] <bdmurray> okay then it might make sense for me to do it
[20:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: networking-l2gw (focal-proposed/universe) [1:16.0.0~b3~git2020032509.d57ae1a-0ubuntu1 => 1:16.0.0~git2020051415.30f4209-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (no packageset)
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (eoan-proposed) [242-7ubuntu3.9]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (bionic-proposed) [237-3ubuntu10.41]
[20:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added studio-controls to ubuntustudio in groovy
[20:48] <Eickmeyer> ^ Thanks!
[21:55] <ddstreet> Eickmeyer i replied to your dmb email, essentially all the DMB bits are done now, we just need the TB to change the packageset uploader over to the new ubuntu-studio-uploaders team
[21:56] <ddstreet> if it gets urgent, you might be able to ping one of the TB members, otherwise I assume they'll get to it at their next meeting
[21:57] <fo0bar> flipping through channels; IRTA "i replied to your dumb email"
[22:39] <Eickmeyer> ddstreet: Thanks!
[22:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-desktop3 (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.2-0ubuntu1 => 3.36.2-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)