[00:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireguard-linux-compat (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.20200506-1~19.10.1 => 1.0.20200506-1~19.10.2] (no packageset)
[01:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-os-ken [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu1.1]
[01:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.service [source] (focal-proposed) [2.1.1-0ubuntu1.1]
[07:49] <locutus_> vorlon, look e.g. http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/b/bilibop/groovy/amd64
[07:50] <locutus_> and people reporting "can't boot properly with -proposed enabled"
[07:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireguard-linux-compat (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.20200506-1~19.10.1 => 1.0.20200506-1~19.10.2] (no packageset)
[07:50] <locutus_> and even after uploading the "ubuntu2" (that is bit-bit the same as the one in release), the autopkgtests still were bad
[07:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected wireguard-linux-compat [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.20200506-1~19.10.2]
[08:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireguard-linux-compat [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.20200506-1~19.10.2]
[09:02] <juliank> heads up that apt 2.1.3 seems to have broken dpkg --unpack/-i && apt-get install -f type scenarios, which breaks autopkgtest amongst other things
[09:03] <juliank> So it won't make it out of proposed, as it can't satisfy its own test dependencies :D
[09:03] <juliank> But still might cause some trouble with all-proposed runs, for example
[09:17] <Laney> any reason to keep it in proposed?
[09:26] <sil2100> Should I drop it from -proposed then?
[09:26] <Laney> juliank: ^----
[09:26] <Laney> sil2100: (imho yes)
[09:27] <juliank> Laney: We can, yes
[09:27] <juliank> sil2100: ^
[09:27] <juliank> Now releasing 2.1.4
[09:27] <juliank> so I could locally sync that and avoid extra work on your side
[09:28] <juliank> but it's a bit of a meh situation I suppose
[09:30] <sil2100> juliank: it's not a big deal, let me remove it then
[09:51] <seb128> could someone from the SRU team review vala/focal? it's needed to fix bug #1878361 (we need the fixed vala then to rebuild the application)
[10:44] <locutus_> hello vorlon do you think we can kick out from release scap-security-guide? its preventing python3-only pyyaml migration
[10:45] <locutus_> its out from debian testing
[10:49] <seb128> bdmurray, ^ if you could review the vala SRU later maybe?
[10:55] <locutus_> do we still need mongodb? xnox ?
[11:06] <locutus_> vorlon, regarding your hint on r-bioc-rhdf5/amd64, looks like the new r-cran-testthat (probably) started running tests, so they are not a real regression, just they were not run before
[11:07] <locutus_> or the new pkg-r-autopkgtest probably
[11:08] <locutus_> in any case, not a regression
[11:09] <locutus_> this is something that introduced lots of regression in other r-* packages too, specially s390x, holding almost all the ongoing transitions
[11:24] <xnox> locutus_:  we want to rip out src:mongodb, but we had a vague plan to upload src:mongodb-sspl into multiverse. But i'm not sure if that has happened yet. (and thus offer users some continiuty)
[11:24] <xnox> locutus_:  but also i think we still had a few packages in universe that reference mongodb, and that should be dropped and/or demoted from Depends to something lower.
[11:25] <xnox> Reverse-Build-Depends-Indep
[11:25] <xnox> * aodh                          (for mongodb)
[11:25] <xnox> * zaqar                         (for mongodb)
[11:26] <xnox> i think will fail, if we demote src:mongodb to multiverse as src:mongodb-sspl but not sure.
[11:26] <xnox> actually maybe it should work hm.... I can't remember if universe builds, are allowed to build-depend on multiverse or not.
[11:26] <xnox> (i know that binaries may not depend, but can't remember if it was allowed in Ubuntu, to be used during build)
[11:29] <cjwatson> They aren't
[11:29] <cjwatson> Build-dependencies downward in supportedness are allowed nowadays, but not downward in freedom
[11:31] <xnox> cjwatson:  thank you! that makes sense.
[11:31] <xnox> (i.e. restricted can build-depend on multiverse)
[11:35] <cjwatson> Yes
[12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-32.36] (core, kernel)
[12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.0-1 => 20.04.0-2~ubuntu20.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[12:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-32.36] (core, kernel)
[12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-32.36] (core, kernel)
[12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-32.36] (core, kernel)
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-32.36]
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-32.36]
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-32.36]
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-32.36]
[12:59] <locutus_> aodh and zaqar needs merge from debian?
[13:00] <locutus_> in Debian they use pymongo
[13:00] <locutus_> (and suggest mongodb)
[13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sssd (eoan-proposed/main) [2.2.0-4ubuntu1 => 2.2.0-4ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sssd (bionic-proposed/main) [1.16.1-1ubuntu1.5 => 1.16.1-1ubuntu1.6] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evince (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.0-2 => 3.36.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-102.103] (core, kernel)
[14:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-180.210] (core, kernel)
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-102.103] (core, kernel)
[14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-180.210]
[14:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-102.103]
[14:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-102.103]
[14:50] <cking> hi there, i'd like to get 0.05.23-1ubuntu3 in xenial released, it fixes an issue found in testing during for 0.05.23-1ubuntu2, can this be nudged
[15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-dynamic-routing [source] (focal-proposed) [2:16.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[15:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted networking-hyperv [source] (focal-proposed) [1:8.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted networking-bgpvpn [source] (focal-proposed) [12.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[15:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted networking-odl [source] (focal-proposed) [1:16.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted networking-sfc [source] (focal-proposed) [10.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[16:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-fwaas [source] (focal-proposed) [1:16.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[16:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-vpnaas [source] (focal-proposed) [2:16.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted octavia [source] (focal-proposed) [6.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[16:18] <vorlon> locutus_: wrt the initramfs-tools merge, if you used MoM for the merge, did you happen to verify that none of the scripts that were +x in the earlier tarball had been made -x by the merge?
[16:23] <vorlon> because MoM seems to have an annoying bug in this regard which has defied fixing
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted swift [source] (focal-proposed) [2.25.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[16:23] <vorlon> locutus_: pyyaml seems to have migrated and is now only NBS?
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted manila [source] (focal-proposed) [1:10.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[16:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mistral [source] (focal-proposed) [10.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[17:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (focal-proposed/main) [2.13.3-7ubuntu5 => 2.13.3-7ubuntu5.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted senlin [source] (focal-proposed) [9.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted watcher [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: umis [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0.7-1] (no packageset)
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: umis [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0.7-1] (no packageset)
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: umis [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0.7-1] (no packageset)
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: umis [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0.7-1] (no packageset)
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: masakari (focal-proposed/main) [9.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 9.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] (no packageset)
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: umis [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0.7-1] (no packageset)
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sahara [source] (focal-proposed) [1:12.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vala [source] (focal-proposed) [0.48.6-0ubuntu1]
[18:57] <bdmurray> dannf`: Did you do the regression test in bug 1875984?
[19:29] <dannf`> bdmurray: i don't recall - but i just did. it worked, i'll note as much in the bug
[19:29] <coreycb> bdmurray: I have just one more upload in the focal unapproved queue to fix a component mismatch for masakari
[19:29] <coreycb> bdmurray: vorlon: thanks for all the reviews, really appreciate it
[19:30] <bdmurray> coreycb: I looked but was waiting for it to migrate in groovy
[19:30] <coreycb> bdmurray: ah cool, good idea
[19:31] <bdmurray> coreycb: if you see it migrate feel free to ping me
[19:31] <coreycb> bdmurray: sounds good, I'll keep an eye on it and will let you know
[20:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python-masakariclient (groovy-proposed/primary) [6.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[21:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [1.450.1]
[21:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sbuild-launchpad-chroot [source] (focal-proposed) [0.16ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[21:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sbuild-launchpad-chroot [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.15ubuntu0.19.10.1]
[21:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sbuild-launchpad-chroot [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.14ubuntu0.18.04.2]
[21:21] <coreycb> bdmurray: masakari has migrated in groovy
[21:23] <bdmurray> coreycb: ack
[21:28] <kanashiro> hi, I am investigating why genshi is blocked in proposed for 18 days and I noticed python 2 binary package was dropped in this new version and in the excuses page says that python-genshi is missing
[21:28] <kanashiro> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#genshi
[21:28] <kanashiro> I also did not find any reverse dependency
[21:29] <kanashiro> does anyone has a clue on how to unblock it?
[21:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yaru-theme [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.7]
[21:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adwaita-icon-theme [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.1-2ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[21:43] <vorlon> kanashiro: that's an awkward thing in britney because the package moved from building an arch: any binary to now only building arch: all binaries; so it miscalculates whether a build is missing
[21:44] <vorlon> kanashiro: I'll just axe the python-genshi binaries from groovy (after double-checking no revdeps) and that will clear it
[21:45] <kanashiro> vorlon: ah right, thank you for that
[21:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted masakari [source] (focal-proposed) [9.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.2]
[22:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tilda [source] (focal-proposed) [1.5.2-0ubuntu1]
[22:36] <bdmurray> hrrm, sru-review is hung and I don't know what its up to