/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/05/20/#ubuntu-release.txt

tumbleweedwhat version of autodep8 is the CI infrastructure using?00:16
tumbleweedif it's from from 18.04, it'd explain the r-bioc-rhdf5 failure and I can stop tearing hair out (missing tset dep)00:17
vorlontumbleweed: autodep8 is deployed from https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/+git/autodep801:14
vorlonseems to be 0.1901:15
vorlonso not 18.04, but older than what's in focal, to be sure01:15
EickmeyerQuick question: what is the proper versioning for a Debian package that needs to be SRU'd? For instance, if it's 0.24.8~dfsg0-1 would it be 0.24.8~dfsg0-1~20.04.1 or 0.24.8~dfsg0-1ubuntu1~20.04.1?01:18
vorlonEickmeyer: recommending versioning scheme here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Update_the_packaging01:22
Eickmeyervorlon: ta01:22
Eickmeyer(I was close with my second example)01:25
vorlontumbleweed: correction, looks like that branch is up-to-date with 0.2201:27
tumbleweedvorlon: with what apt sources available?03:16
tumbleweed(the R stuff uses grep-aptavail)03:16
tumbleweedwell, more to the point, grep-dctrl03:16
tumbleweedno, the aptavail is what matters03:19
tumbleweedso, I'm guessing xenial03:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libclamunrar [amd64] (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [0.102.3-2] (no packageset)05:16
vorlontumbleweed: er, it runs grep-dctrl against a file in the package source, doesn't it? (DESCRIPTION)05:41
tumbleweedvorlon: yes, but it gets the list of R modules available in the world, from apt06:13
tumbleweedthere was a force-reset-test for it. commented and bumped06:13
vorlontumbleweed: ah.  ok, that seems rather terrible06:13
tumbleweedindeed06:14
tumbleweedwe colud hack it to look at lists of packages that we maintain separately, but ick06:14
tumbleweedI guess it's a sign that autopkgtests are maturing, that this release a lot of the issues I'm looking at are specific to Ubuntu's test-runner environment's difference to debian06:16
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, you were right, missing "+x" on init file08:18
LocutusOfBorgdamn MoM bugs!08:18
LocutusOfBorgand thanks!08:19
Laneytumbleweed: Sounds like a bug in autodep8 :(08:19
Laneydoes Debian provide that guarantee?08:19
LocutusOfBorguploading on bileto, lets see08:19
LaneyI guess we should check snakefruit to see if anything to stuck after the networking incident yesterday08:34
Laneythat's happened before08:34
* Laney does08:34
Laneyheh, there was a run of https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/testing-ports/ from Apr 2608:36
Laneysuch a used service08:36
Laneylooks ok apart from that08:36
=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer
=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer
=== ergiusenss is now known as sergiusens
dokoRikMills: loaklize still recommends python2 packages, blocking some NBS10:39
=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wpa (focal-proposed/main) [2:2.9-1ubuntu4 => 2:2.9-1ubuntu5] (core)11:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected wpa [source] (focal-proposed) [2:2.9-1ubuntu5]11:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wpa (focal-proposed/main) [2:2.9-1ubuntu4 => 2:2.9-1ubuntu5] (core)11:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: select2.js [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [4.0.13+dfsg1-2] (no packageset)11:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libproxy (focal-proposed/main) [0.4.15-10 => 0.4.15-10ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)11:29
RikMillsdoko: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lokalize/4:20.04.1-0ubuntu211:48
dokota11:50
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g_
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: urwid (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-3 => 2.1.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)12:30
dokoLaney: can you have an extra dependency for an autopkg test, which is triggered by Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-python12:35
dokoor anybody else12:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected urwid [source] (focal-proposed) [2.1.0-1ubuntu1]12:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (groovy-proposed/main) [2.12.0-0ubuntu3 => 2.12.0-0ubuntu4] (core)12:41
coreycbdoko: hi, we had python-ironicclient in main at one point via bug 1376238. by any chance could we get python3-ironicclient into main for focal and above?13:04
ubot5bug 1376238 in python-ironicclient (Ubuntu) "[MIR] python-ironicclient" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/137623813:04
Laneydoko: If you add a test with "Restrictions: hint-testsuite-triggers" and the extra depends in "Depends:" of that test, it should do what you want (I think, test it in bileto or something)13:07
dokoLaney: in debian/control ? the package doesn't have a separate test14:01
Laneyin debian/tests/control14:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-clocks (focal-proposed/universe) [3.36.0-1ubuntu0.1 => 3.36.0-1ubuntu0.2] (desktop-extra)14:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vala (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.40.19-0ubuntu1 => 0.40.23-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)14:26
seb128rbasak, ^ could you review that gnome-clocks SRU? it's a trivial no change upload to rebuild with a fixed toolchain and fix a regression from the previous SRU (which sadly already moved to -updates so would be nice to get the regression fix going)14:49
rbasakLooking14:50
rbasakseb128: broken bug reference?14:50
dokoxnox: could you have a look at https://launchpadlibrarian.net/477651652/buildlog_ubuntu-groovy-amd64.vcmi_0.99+dfsg+git20190113.f06c8a87-1build2_BUILDING.txt.gz  boost 1.71 issue14:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-clocks (focal-proposed/universe) [3.36.0-1ubuntu0.1 => 3.36.0-1ubuntu0.2] (desktop-extra)14:51
seb128rbasak, good eyes! thanks, ^14:51
zesty"pkexec do-release-upgrade -d -m desktop -f DistUpgradeViewKDE" gives me a front door message that says "This release is still in development. Do not install it on production machines."  Just an oversight?14:58
vorlonLaney: testing-ports> heh15:00
zestywithout the "-d" option I get "There is no development version of an LTS available."15:00
zestySo... mostly released?15:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adwaita-icon-theme (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.1-2ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 3.36.1-2ubuntu0.20.04.2] (core, i386-whitelist)15:02
xnoxdoko:  looks very odd indeed.15:04
dokobdmurray: apport should b-d on pyflakes3, not pyflakes. could you change that?15:18
bdmurraydoko: yes15:19
dokobdmurray: are you calling pyflakes3 as well?15:22
bdmurraydoko: yes15:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-clocks [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.0-1ubuntu0.2]15:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-clocks [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.0-1ubuntu0.2]15:31
rbasakseb128: ^ sorry for the delay. I had interrupts and am still unwinding my stack.15:31
rbasakI was going to add a vala Focal task but I think a Launchpad bug is stopping me from doing that.15:32
rbasak(presumably it is Fix Released though)15:32
vorlondoko, bdmurray: oops I already uploaded that change15:56
vorlonand NBS-cleaned up pyflakes15:56
bdmurrayokay16:00
bdmurrayvorlon: shouldn't these tzdata updates go to -security?16:01
tumbleweedLaney: filed a bug for the autodep8 R thing: https://bugs.debian.org/96113816:09
ubot5Debian bug 961138 in autodep8 "autodep8 uses host APT packages to generate dependencies for pkg-r-autopkgtest tests" [Normal,Open]16:09
Laneynice one16:16
seb128rbasak, it's fix release in g for vala yes, and fix commit in focal (SRU in proposed)16:24
seb128rbasak, and thanks for the reviews!16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: biosig4c++ [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.9.5-1] (no packageset)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: biosig4c++ [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.9.5-1] (no packageset)16:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: biosig4c++ [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.9.5-1] (no packageset)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: biosig4c++ [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.9.5-1] (no packageset)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: biosig4c++ [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.9.5-1] (no packageset)16:27
vorlonbdmurray: well security SRUs are supposed to be built in the security pocket, which these haven't been16:32
vorlonbdmurray: maybe that's ok because they're data-only, but we'd need the security team to ack16:32
bdmurrayvorlon: how can we get that ack?16:37
vorlonsbeattie: ^^ do you want to ack this? :)16:37
sbeattieone sec, let me look16:38
vorlon"Due to the potentially disastrous consequences of having localtime differ between systems running -updates and systems running only -security, this package is always kept in sync between the two pockets." https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates but it doesn't mention whether the package needs to be built in -security16:40
bdmurraythis built w/ updates afaict https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/2019c-0ubuntu0.18.04/+build/1783739916:42
sbeattieI acked on LP: #187810816:43
ubot5Launchpad bug 1878108 in tzdata (Ubuntu Trusty) "new upstream release 2020a" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187810816:43
bdmurraysbeattie: what should the process be going forward?16:43
Eickmeyerrbasak: I have an SRU in bug 1877806, I just wanted to gauge your thoughts on it.16:45
ubot5bug 1877806 in ardour (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] ardour crashes when saving lv2 plugin preset - bug discovered in lilv" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187780616:45
sbeattiebdmurray: as long as tzdata retains the status of being data-only plus one shell script, I think going forward it is fine to build in -proposed.16:48
rbasakEickmeyer: sorry, I won't have time today - about to finish.16:48
Eickmeyerrbasak: Ok, thanks.16:48
bdmurraysbeattie: okay, should we get security to review each one?16:48
sbeattiebdmurray: yeah, let's do that, and if it interferes with the ability to get timely tzdata updates landed, we can revisit.16:49
bdmurraysbeattie: the review could happen before the verification is done / when it ends up in -proposed16:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu3~18.04.2]16:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tmux (focal-proposed/main) [3.0a-2 => 3.0a-2ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-server)16:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tmux [source] (focal-proposed) [3.0a-2ubuntu0.1]16:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: biosig4c++ [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.9.5-1] (no packageset)17:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added lilv to ubuntustudio in bionic17:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added lilv to ubuntustudio in eoan17:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added lilv to ubuntustudio in focal17:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added lilv to ubuntustudio in groovy17:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-matrix-nio [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [0.11.2-2] (no packageset)17:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lilv (focal-proposed/universe) [0.24.6-1 => 0.24.8~dfsg0-1ubuntu0.20.04.1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, ubuntustudio)17:20
EickmeyerCan I get a reject on lilv above? It has a dependency issue I need to resolve. Sorry about the mess!17:33
Eickmeyervorlon: ^ ?17:37
vorlonEickmeyer: rejected17:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lilv [source] (focal-proposed) [0.24.8~dfsg0-1ubuntu0.20.04.1]17:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted biosig4c++ [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.9.5-1]18:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted biosig4c++ [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.9.5-1]18:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted biosig4c++ [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.9.5-1]18:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libclamunrar [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.102.3-2]18:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-matrix-nio [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.11.2-2]18:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted biosig4c++ [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.9.5-1]18:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted biosig4c++ [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.9.5-1]18:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted select2.js [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [4.0.13+dfsg1-2]18:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted biosig4c++ [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.9.5-1]18:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-masakariclient [source] (groovy-proposed) [6.0.0-0ubuntu1]18:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted umis [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.7-1]18:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted umis [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.7-1]18:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted umis [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.7-1]18:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted umis [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.7-1]18:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted umis [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.7-1]18:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libclamunrar [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.102.3-1]18:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted notcurses [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2.3+dfsg.1-1]18:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted notcurses [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2.3+dfsg.1-1]18:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted purify [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.0.0-5]18:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted purify [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [2.0.0-5]18:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted purify [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [2.0.0-5]18:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.42.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1]18:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [i386] (groovy-proposed) [1.42.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1]18:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.42.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1]18:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted notcurses [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2.3+dfsg.1-1]18:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted notcurses [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2.3+dfsg.1-1]18:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted purify [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [2.0.0-5]18:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.42.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1]18:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted notcurses [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2.3+dfsg.1-1]18:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.42.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1]18:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted purify [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2.0.0-5]18:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.42.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1]18:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted apertium-cat-ita [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.2.1-2]18:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted yara [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [4.0.1-1]18:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted yara [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [4.0.1-1]18:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted yara [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [4.0.1-1]18:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted yara [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [4.0.1-1]18:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted yara [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [4.0.1-1]18:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted yara [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [4.0.1-1]18:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-masakariclient [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [6.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)18:05
Eickmeyervorlon: ta18:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-masakariclient [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [6.0.0-0ubuntu1]18:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: live-build (focal-proposed/main) [3.0~a57-1ubuntu38 => 3.0~a57-1ubuntu38.20.04.1] (desktop-core)18:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lilv (focal-proposed/universe) [0.24.6-1 => 0.24.6-1ubuntu0.3] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, ubuntustudio)18:54
Eickmeyervorlon: Sorry to bug you again, but could you reject lilv again? I meant to put that in a PPA first.18:54
EickmeyerIt builds, but I have yet to test and the versioning is wrong.18:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (focal-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu27.2]19:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aptdaemon [source] (focal-proposed) [1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu32.1]19:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aptdaemon [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu28.2]19:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aptdaemon [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu19.3]19:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aptdaemon [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu14.3]19:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lilv [source] (focal-proposed) [0.24.6-1ubuntu0.3]19:22
Eickmeyervorlon: ta19:22
mwhudsonubuntu-archive: is it ok to "SRU" a rustc to focal that won't build on riscv?19:42
jdstrandhey, fyi, the pulseaudio in groovy-proposed isn't migrating cause of a testsuite failure 'FAIL: volume-test'. I did the upload to address a CVE amd didn't touch this area of the code19:43
jdstranderr, testsuite failure on *riscv64* only19:43
jdstrandall the other archs pass. this also bundles a fix from the desktop team from ubuntu4, but it wasn't built on riscv64 there19:45
jdstrandI'm not really in a position to fix this arch-specific issue atm. is this a candidate to be forced?19:46
* jdstrand notes pulseaudio ftbfs on focal19:47
jdstrand(again, for riscv64)19:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pantalaimon [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.6.1-2] (no packageset)19:49
vorlonmwhudson: is that going to cause the rustc package itself to be out of date on riscv64?  will it cause regressions in installability?19:52
mwhudsonvorlon: yes to the former, don't think so to the latter19:53
mwhudsoni guess it means that there will be a librust-std1.41 or whatever it's called on riscv still and librust-std1.42 on others19:53
vorlonmwhudson: ok.  as long as it doesn't increase uninstallabilities, I'd consider it acceptable19:54
mwhudsonvorlon: is there an easy way to check that?19:54
vorlonmwhudson: well we should probably use britney to do that19:55
mwhudsonvorlon: ah well we can almost do that now https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/groovy/update_excuses.html#rustc19:56
mwhudsonvorlon: how do we get britney to ignore the missing build?19:57
vorlonmwhudson: yeah except that's to the release pocket vs updates; there are britney instances for SRUs, so I'd say upload it and we'll see19:57
mwhudsoni know removing the old binaries is one way19:57
vorlonI don't think we do want to ignore the missing build for devel19:57
mwhudsonok19:57
mwhudsonvorlon: ok i've uploaded to focal unapproved20:12
mwhudsonvorlon: this needs to get to the security pocket eventually but i guess that can be done via another upload?20:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rustc (focal-proposed/universe) [1.41.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu2 => 1.42.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu2~20.04.1] (i386-whitelist)20:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lilv (focal-proposed/universe) [0.24.6-1 => 0.24.6-1ubuntu0.1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, ubuntustudio)20:25
EickmeyerOk, ^ that one is for real for SRU bug 187780620:26
ubot5bug 1877806 in ardour (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] ardour crashes when saving lv2 plugin preset - bug discovered in lilv" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187780620:26
RikMillsvorlon: it seems that nmapsi4 in proposed switched to build depending on QtWebEngine, so is now not buildable on ppc4el/s390x/riscv64. Could you remove the release pocket binaries for those?20:54
vorlonRikMills: forensics-all-gui needs fixed first to not depend on it21:05
vorlonRikMills: oh wait, that's arch: all - nevermind21:05
vorlonRikMills: removed21:05
RikMillsvorlon: thanks!21:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager (focal-proposed/main) [1.22.10-1ubuntu2 => 1.22.10-1ubuntu2.1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)21:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected wpa [source] (focal-proposed) [2:2.9-1ubuntu5]21:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wpa (focal-proposed/main) [2:2.9-1ubuntu4 => 2:2.9-1ubuntu5] (core)21:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: djvulibre (bionic-proposed/main) [3.5.27.1-8ubuntu0.1 => 3.5.27.1-8ubuntu0.2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)21:37
vorlonwgrant: any idea why util-linux's setarch --uname-2.6 test would have regressed on riscv64?  it's not a new test23:29
wgrantvorlon: that was failing early on last year, due to an assumption about iirc stack layout that was fixed upstream. I carried a patch in my out-of-archive port for a while, but then one update it started building fine so I assumed the upstream fix had made it downstream. I have notes somewhere, will find in a bit.23:34
wgrantvorlon: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/util-linux/util-linux.git/commit/sys-utils/setarch.c?id=33e87bf1524baa215413cbcb26668e600a7b5cb8 was the fix in question23:37
wgrantnot sure if it's the same issue23:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kmod [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [27+20200310-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)23:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kmod [s390x] (groovy-proposed/main) [27+20200310-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)23:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kmod [i386] (groovy-proposed/main) [27+20200310-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)23:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kmod [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [27+20200310-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)23:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kmod [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [27+20200310-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)23:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kmod [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [27+20200310-2ubuntu1]23:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kmod [i386] (groovy-proposed) [27+20200310-2ubuntu1]23:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kmod [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [27+20200310-2ubuntu1]23:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kmod [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [27+20200310-2ubuntu1]23:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kmod [armhf] (groovy-proposed/main) [27+20200310-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)23:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kmod [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [27+20200310-2ubuntu1]23:53

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!