[00:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-1.14 (focal-proposed/main) [1.14.2-1ubuntu1 => 1.14.3-2ubuntu1~20.04.1] (no packageset) === wgrant_ is now known as wgrant [05:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: picolibc [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.4.2-2] (no packageset) [05:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-toolchain-10 [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:10.0.0-4ubuntu1~18.04.1] (no packageset) === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc [07:18] sil2100, automake-1.15 switched to python3, I'm going to sync it [07:22] also doing automake-1.16 ( seb128 doko ) (trying to sync and preparing a merge in case armhf is still sad) [07:36] LocutusOfBorg, get the merge ready now I think :) [07:36] LocutusOfBorg: thanks! [07:46] seb128, its already ready to go :) [07:47] the reason for the sync, is to keep a history of armhf failures in LP [09:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pulseaudio [source] (focal-proposed) [1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3.3] [09:05] since azure-cli regressed autopkgtests in release https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/azure-cli/groovy/amd64 can we please get an hint? [09:05] also regressed in Debian FWIW [09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pulseaudio [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:11.1-1ubuntu7.8] [09:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.0-2~ubuntu20.04.1] [10:15] coreycb: I don't see anything waiting in the queue for bug 1877642. Is that correct? [10:15] bug 1877642 in vmware-nsx (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] OpenStack Ussuri final release" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1877642 [10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted network-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1.22.10-1ubuntu2.1] [10:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-55.49] (core, kernel) [10:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [s390x] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-55.49] (core, kernel) [10:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-55.49] (core, kernel) [10:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-55.49] (core, kernel) [11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-55.49] [11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-55.49] [11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-55.49] [11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-55.49] [11:23] can someone take a look at the apparmor in focal unapproved? it fixes bug #1872564 which has quite a few dupes [11:23] bug 1872564 in apparmor (Ubuntu Focal) "/proc/sys/kernel/random/boot_id rule missing from abstractions/nameservice" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1872564 [11:25] cc sergiodj ^ [11:31] jdstrand: accepted [11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apparmor [source] (focal-proposed) [2.13.3-7ubuntu5.1] [11:36] tjaalton: thanks! [11:36] sergiodj: you can do sru verification now [11:37] sergiodj: well, when it finishes building of course :) [11:43] hello vorlon, please NBS-proposed cleanup missing build on amd64: golang-go.net-dev (from 1:0.0+git20190811.74dc4d7+dfsg-1) [11:43] ? [11:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-containers-buildah [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.11.6-1ubuntu5] (no packageset) [11:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted picolibc [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2-2] [11:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-containers-buildah [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.11.6-1ubuntu5] (no packageset) [11:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-containers-buildah [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.11.6-1ubuntu5] (no packageset) [11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-containers-buildah [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.11.6-1ubuntu5] (no packageset) [11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-containers-buildah [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.11.6-1ubuntu5] (no packageset) [12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-containers-buildah [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.11.6-1ubuntu5] (no packageset) [12:29] vorlon & tumbleweed: could we roll back QtWebEngine in proposed to 5.14.2+dfsg-1? The current ongoing rebuild is going to entangle the re2 and perl transition with the ongoing Qt one, if I read excuses correctly [12:31] that is it even builds, which is not certain at the moment [12:34] xnox: hi, sg3-utils is also producing a udeb package. In fact, debian dropped it, but it's our delta [12:34] xnox: do your recent d-i changes mean we can drop this udeb? [12:50] rbasak: that's correct, there's nothing left in the queue. thanks for checking! [13:00] ahasenack: no, you still need that at the moment [13:01] ok [13:01] sadface [13:01] ahasenack: inspecting http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu/dists/focal/main/debian-installer/binary-amd64/Packages.gz [13:01] you can see that multipath-udeb depends on sg3-udeb, meaning multipath-udeb will become "uninstallable" and thus hold things up [13:02] but if we are no longer going to build d-i, why do we still need all these udebs? [13:02] either we need to make britney not care about udeb installability, or like make launchpad to build everything with noudeb build profile [13:02] ahasenack: because we need to unwind them in an orderly fashion, and we have not yet done that work =) [13:02] ah, ok [13:02] their days are numbered then [13:04] and one needs to like remove leave udebs first, or like all of them together, something like that [13:12] xnox: or we just remove them from the archive and ignore them on uploads :) [13:16] juliank: yeah, that, too. but i guess lp change too? [13:17] either a tiny LP change or just strip them from .changes automatically before uploading [13:17] :D [14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-33.37] (core, kernel) [14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-33.37] (core, kernel) [14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-33.37] (core, kernel) [14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-33.37] (core, kernel) [14:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-33.37] [14:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-33.37] [14:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-33.37] [14:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-33.37] [14:15] jdstrand: thanks. I'll wait for simon to do the verification. if we don't see anything until the end of the day, I'll do it myself [14:27] sergiodj: cool, thanks! I suspect he will jump on it. you might wait til Monday to give him a chance to do it over the weekend [14:27] jdstrand: awesome, will do :) [14:28] sergiodj: it needs to sit in proposed for a week any way :) [14:37] RikMills: I'd expect the re2 transition to sail through. But, ah I hadn't realised that I'd be entangling perl too. Duh. [14:37] no objection for me, if you can get qt through [14:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bind9 [s390x] (groovy-proposed/main) [1:9.16.2-3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [14:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bind9 [i386] (groovy-proposed/main) [1:9.16.2-3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [14:50] tumbleweed: thanks. I'll see what vorlon thinks this evening [14:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bind9 [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [1:9.16.2-3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [14:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bind9 [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [1:9.16.2-3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [15:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bind9 [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [1:9.16.2-3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bind9 [armhf] (groovy-proposed/main) [1:9.16.2-3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [15:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1060.63] (no packageset) [15:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1040.44~16.04.1] (kernel) [15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1072.82] (no packageset) [15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-5.0 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1038.39] (kernel) [15:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1072.82] [15:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-5.0 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1038.39] [15:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1060.63] [15:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1040.44~16.04.1] [16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added qt5-ukui-platformtheme to ubuntukylin in bionic [16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added ukui-sidebar to ubuntukylin in eoan [16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added qt5-ukui-platformtheme to ubuntukylin in focal [16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added ukui-sidebar to ubuntukylin in groovy [16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added qt5-ukui-platformtheme to ubuntukylin in eoan [16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added ukui-sidebar to ubuntukylin in focal [16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added ukui-sidebar to ubuntukylin in bionic [16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added qt5-ukui-platformtheme to ubuntukylin in groovy [16:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bind9 [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/main) [1:9.16.2-3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [17:02] ubuntu-archive: hello, bind9 has a new bind9-dev binary [17:10] ubuntu-archive please check https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/ubuntu-archive-tools/bzr-to-git/+merge/384436 [18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1040.44] (kernel) [18:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.664.1 => 2.664.2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) [18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1040.44] [18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (eoan-proposed/main) [2.620.2 => 2.620.3] (desktop-core) [18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-containers-buildah [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.11.6-1ubuntu5] [18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-containers-buildah [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.11.6-1ubuntu5] [18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-containers-buildah [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.11.6-1ubuntu5] [18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-containers-buildah [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.11.6-1ubuntu5] [18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-containers-buildah [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.11.6-1ubuntu5] [18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-containers-buildah [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.11.6-1ubuntu5] [18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bind9 [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1:9.16.2-3ubuntu1] [18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bind9 [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1:9.16.2-3ubuntu1] [18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bind9 [i386] (groovy-proposed) [1:9.16.2-3ubuntu1] [18:22] thanks! ^ [18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bind9 [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1:9.16.2-3ubuntu1] [18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bind9 [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1:9.16.2-3ubuntu1] [18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bind9 [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1:9.16.2-3ubuntu1] [18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bind9 [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1:9.16.2-3ubuntu1] [18:33] sil2100: question on LP: #1875485 for you [18:33] Launchpad bug 1875485 in python-botocore (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] python-botocore out of date" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1875485 [18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-botocore [source] (focal-proposed) [1.15.46+repack-1ubuntu0.20.04.1] [18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected awscli [source] (focal-proposed) [1.18.46-1ubuntu0.20.04.1] [18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected awscli [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.18.46-1ubuntu0.19.10.1] [18:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected awscli [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.18.46-1ubuntu0.19.10.1] [18:42] vorlon: can we roll back qtwebengine, or do we accept that the re2 and perl transition will entangle with the Qt one? [18:49] sil2100: hmm I see that on versions prior to eoan, awscli was uploaded to depend on python3-botocore (>= 1.12.103), but the version mentioned in the bug as required is 1.15.47... which is correct? setup.cfg says botocore==1.15.46 [18:51] doko: you say you uploaded probert for pyflakes removal; did you send the changes to the Server Team? (LP: #1879731) [18:51] Launchpad bug 1879731 in probert (Ubuntu) "probert build-depends on obsolete pyflakes package" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1879731 [18:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected awscli [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.18.46-1ubuntu0.18.04.1] [18:54] tumbleweed: ^^ see RikMills comment above, if packages are already in -proposed as part of other transitions please check with folks before uploading [18:54] RikMills: IIRC qtwebengine takes quite a while to build, so I should probably let it finish before deciding whether to remove anything [18:55] RikMills: and this does not necessarily slow down the qt transition, which is still waiting for test results on a number of dependent packages [18:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected awscli [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.18.46-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] [18:58] vorlon: no problem. webengine can sometimes take ~24hrs on arm64, sometimes less [19:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libnamespace-autoclean-perl to i386-whitelist in groovy [19:35] yeah, I didn't expect Qt to migrate before I got this ready [19:35] But I wasn't expecting perl to be caught up (I'm less familiar with their dependencies). That seems like a problem [19:40] tumbleweed: the rdeps test of the entangling re2 rebuild look a bit angry (red) [19:40] https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#libre-engine-re2-perl [19:41] yeah, I see those. I'll dig into them [19:41] autodep8-perl-build-deps FAIL [19:44] perl itself had broken tests for 4 or 5 packages, so that is not a valid candidate soon :/ [19:44] indeed. I've been picking some of them off [19:46] then again, Qt transition is already blocked on the hdf5/proj/etc one, so not as if that will be ok soon either [19:55] xnox: what do you want to have happen with https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/ubuntu-archive-tools/built-using/+merge/308697 ? you had reviewed it needs-fixing yourself [19:56] I'm not sure if you currently believe this dtrt or not, or what was in the "too much stuff" you said infinity said it was promoting [19:56] vorlon: my comment from 2018 went un-answered [19:56] vorlon: i think we merge something, but not it, and the current reports are still confusing [19:57] xnox: because I don't understand that comment, and it didn't change your own review status [19:57] vorlon: i.e. do you have something today that is blocked on built-using MIR in components-missmatches and is it hard to tell why? [19:59] xnox: I thought the issue is that today, things that are in built-using for main are NOT listed in c-m? [19:59] so we aren't promoting them but are meant to [20:00] hm [20:00] vorlon: and i can't run components-missmatches report [20:00] because i do not have any ssh access to any machine with unsplit mirror [20:00] and all of these reports cannot work against split mirrors [20:01] or like against apt sources, that have all arches enabled and have things in /var/lib/apt/lists/ [20:01] vorlon: give me shell access to snakefruit, and let me have RO access to the unsplit mirror, and i can poke it [20:02] vorlon: i think most of this fell out of concern when we stopped doing static linkin of prebuilt golang stuff? [20:02] since 2016 my hacked up version of things is gone [20:02] that's not a reason for getting shell access to snakefruit :) [20:03] vorlon: i need access to unsplit mirror [20:03] vorlon: how can i have it? [20:03] vorlon: all of you have it, but me. cause i don't have shell on snakefruit, nor nusakan, and there is no other machine with unsplit mirror available. [20:03] xnox: doesn't canonistack give access to ftpmaster.internal? [20:03] over the network [20:03] not locally mounted [20:04] and all of this stuff access things not over the network, but via file access [20:04] vorlon: can i nfs mount ftpmaster.internal? [20:04] I don't believe so [20:05] so i should go and create one more local copy of ftpmaster.internal on people.canonical.com? [20:05] obviously not [20:05] i think before snakefruit, it was available to everyone on people.canonical.com because ~ubuntu-archive was there too [20:05] but you could launch a large instance, rsync it, do what you need to do [20:06] and then terminate [20:06] is it reasonable to make our tools not use RAW unsplit mirror? [20:07] do you even need access to the pool or just dists? [20:07] i.e. port the reports to use chdist which enables ports & archive, and apt-get updates all the things? [20:07] $ for src in $(grep-dctrl -n -sBuilt-Using -FBuilt-Using -r . /var/lib/apt/lists/us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_focal_main_*amd64_Packages | sed -e's/ ([^)]*)//g; s/, */\n/g'| sort -u); do rmadison -s focal -a source $src | grep /; done [20:07] vorlon: most of the reports only ever need dists, or just a subset of files. [20:07] unicode-data | 13.0.0-2build1 | focal/universe | source [20:07] $ [20:07] so focal has one B-U-based component mismatch that we didn't know about [20:07] yet somehow they operate against full raw mirrors, for no reason [20:08] which was there since 2016 and we knew about ;-) [20:08] https://people.canonical.com/~xnox/germinate-output/builtusing/components-missmatches.svg [20:08] cuase it's up there [20:08] also ubuntu-push (but that is dead now, irght?) [20:08] unicode-data: unicode-data [20:08] MIR: #1194070 (Fix Released) [20:08] [Reverse-Built-Using: libgucharmap-2-90-7 (MAIN)] [20:09] vorlon: i think we can just promote that one thing and forget about all of this? [20:09] nusakan uses the pool. snakefruit, I don't think mirrors anything but dists. it's not that difficult to just rsync dists from both sources for local operations, or from ftpmaster.internal if on the Canonical network. A wrapper script to do that would be reasonable. [20:09] xnox: that doesn't help us for future mismatches that get overlooked [20:10] the scripts don't implement the policy [20:11] heh, nusakan has an apt-mirror directory with 109G in dists, none of it newer than yakkety [20:11] super effective [20:11] yes [20:11] maybe we can purge that [20:11] 9.6G apt-mirror/dists/ci-train-ppa-service [20:11] or like use rsync-fuse fs to just "mount" ftpmaster.internal [20:12] most of the time, we just access the same 100-300 .debs that are in the pool [20:12] on isos [20:12] and not all of it [20:12] oops, I said nusakan above and I meant snakefruit [20:12] *snakefruit* has 109G of garbage [20:12] vorlon: is there rsync from ftpmaster.internal? from people.canonical.com rsync ftpmaster.internal is nothing [20:13] vorlon: what is the anonftp settings on nusakan? [20:14] yes, there is; nusakan uses rsync. I wouldn't think that's restricted [20:14] module name or something? [20:14] ah it uses a password [20:14] so apparently restricted [20:15] so yeah, that's my problem is that i cannot mirror or access mounted ftpmaster.internal [20:15] and all of you, brush it off, as if it is available, when it is not [20:15] can't mirror with rsync. can trivially do so with wget [20:15] no, one cannot trivially mirror with wget [20:15] because _nothing_ does it like that [20:16] nusakan needs rsync because it needs the pool [20:16] you don't need the pool for germinate work [20:16] good luck trying to build ubuntu-cdimage/debian-cd images for amd64 & arm64 simultaniously with split rsyncs [20:17] look, I'm aware that this sucks for doing debian-cd work [20:17] to do any debian-cd / ubuntu-cdimage work, i have a a massive patch to skip building pool and downloading artefacts [20:17] that's just one reason why I'd like to get rid of debian-cd from the toolchain [20:17] but we were talking about ubuntu-archive-tools [20:17] right [20:17] and that wants a consistent multiarch view of the archive [20:17] and you're rejecting the practical workarounds that I'm offering [20:18] mirroring dists is not hard [20:18] which is? [20:18] use wget on people.canonical.com? [20:18] sure [20:18] about cdimage [20:19] why does it publish a full tree as a thing that frontends rsync [20:19] instead of like publishing all of that into a swift bucket? [20:19] and then just let swift serve the bucket publically? [20:19] is it because we rely on apache serving those dirs with httpaccess & HEADER.html stuff? [20:19] because it predates swift :P [20:19] can we pre-render those htmls too? [20:19] to have it a static content thing? [20:20] vorlon: the problem i have with wget, is that it has no idea what symlinks are [20:20] and /ubuntu/ubuntu/ubuntu is aweful [20:20] heh [20:20] the HEADER.html stuff was initially because it was shell and doing all the directory listing stuff was too much of a pain. I'm sure it could pre-render index.html nowadays instead if somebody cared to do the work [20:20] but that's outside of dists [20:21] and for releases.u.c, rsync and mirroring are pretty essential [20:22] vorlon: yes, and all the current/ symlinks under http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/focal/main/ [20:22] are not fun to download over and over again [20:23] cjwatson: hm..... indeed. instead of generating HEADER.html it could spit out the full index.html [20:23] I'm pretty sure you or I could have had the whole thing downloaded, duplicate contents included, in the time we've spent talking about this :) [20:23] (and on that note, afk) [20:25] please archive admins NBS cleanup golang-go.net-dev [20:26] PS ftpmaster.internal::ubuntu-dists/ is rsyncable from lillypilly [20:27] xnox: ^- [20:28] That is the same thing that snakefruit rsyncs [20:29] (And yes, possibly a bit historical because ~ubuntu-archive used to be there; but nevertheless, it works, and as long as staff aren't ridiculously abusing it to the point where ftpmaster stops performing reasonably, there's no particular reason to remove it) [20:32] cjwatson: thank you. I've asked vorlon which modules are available to rsync (because doing rsync ftpmaster.internal:: says nothing) and vorlon didn't know [20:32] cjwatson: this is amazing! [20:38] lillypilly has access to ubuntu-dists and ubuntu-germinate [20:40] cjwatson: what is ubuntu-germinate? [20:40] (germinate output as produced by lp publication stuff?) [20:43] That [20:43] Used by some of the archive reports [20:45] tah [20:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: skopeo [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1.40-2] (no packageset) [20:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: skopeo [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1.40-2] (no packageset) [20:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: skopeo [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1.40-2] (no packageset) [20:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: skopeo [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1.40-2] (no packageset) [20:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: skopeo [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1.40-2] (no packageset) [20:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1072.82~16.04.1] (kernel) [20:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1072.82~16.04.1] [21:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: skopeo [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1.40-2] (no packageset) [21:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted skopeo [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.40-2] [21:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted skopeo [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.40-2] [21:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted skopeo [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.40-2] [21:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted skopeo [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.40-2] [21:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted skopeo [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.40-2] [21:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted skopeo [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.40-2] [21:46] LocutusOfBorg: golang-go.net-dev> done [21:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted php7.4 [source] (focal-proposed) [7.4.3-4ubuntu2.1] [21:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted php7.3 [source] (eoan-proposed) [7.3.11-0ubuntu0.19.10.5] [22:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted php7.2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.2.24-0ubuntu0.18.04.5] [22:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-desktop3 [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.2-0ubuntu2] [22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected simple-scan [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.2.1-0ubuntu0.20.04.0] [22:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-iscsi [source] (focal-proposed) [2.0.874-7.1ubuntu6.1] [22:21] rafaeldtinoco: hi, it's unclear to me why you've set the block-proposed-focal tag on LP: #1877617 in addition to block-proposed-groovy, can you explain? [22:21] Launchpad bug 1877617 in open-iscsi (Ubuntu Eoan) "Automatic scans cause instability for cloud use cases" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1877617 [22:21] rafaeldtinoco: (considering it's been uploaded for multiple series and focal is the only stable series that has the block tag set) [22:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-iscsi [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.0.874-7.1ubuntu3.1] [22:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-iscsi [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.874-5ubuntu2.10] [22:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gamemode [source] (focal-proposed) [1.5.1-0ubuntu3.1] [23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pspp [s390x] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.2.0-4] (no packageset) [23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: php-horde-service-urlshortener [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [2.0.3-5] (no packageset) [23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pspp [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-4] (no packageset) [23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pspp [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-4] (no packageset) [23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pspp [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-4] (no packageset) [23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maas [source] (focal-proposed) [1:0.7] [23:46] vorlon: I should have removed that tag now, my mistake [23:47] sorry about that [23:47] rafaeldtinoco: ok