[10:55] <lubot> <mitya57> @RikMills qtwebengine finally built fine in 4072. Do you think it's ok to land it now?
[10:57] <lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 [@RikMills qtwebengine finally built fine in 4072. Do you think it's ok to land i …], Probably, as Qt is not migrating any time soon. Can we run the testis or the PPA though to make sure rdep tests are ok?
[10:57] <lubot> <mitya57> I forgot how to do this :(
[10:58] <lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 [I forgot how to do this :(], diff and set lander signoff to approved
[10:59] <lubot> <RikMills> after a couple of 20 min bileto bot updates, tests should run
[10:59] <lubot> <mitya57> Doing.
[11:00] <lubot> <RikMills> :)
[11:14] <lubot> <RikMills> Maybe we should also ask vorlon tonight if he is happy with it landing. Our original Qt landing stomped on another transition, which vorlon reverted webengine to get through. Then the other day I bemoaned someone else's webengine rebuild that entangled re2. So to maintain good will, and in case this rebuild has picked up a dep in pro
[11:14] <lubot> posed we can't tell, then asking would be smart.
[11:16] <lubot> <mitya57> Asked on #-release.
[11:19] <lubot> <RikMills> Great. This is safer. Going to need his help to get Qt through 😉
[15:17] <lubot> <mitya57> https://bileto.ubuntu.com/excuses/4072/groovy.html — looks like Bileto does not use packages from -proposed
[15:17] <lubot> <mitya57> "libqt5webengine5 : Depends: libqt5core5a (>= 5.14.2+dfsg~) but 5.12.8+dfsg-0ubuntu1 is to be installed"
[15:22] <lubot> <RikMills> odd. I am sure is has before on ones I did
[21:39] <lubot> <RikMills> vorlon said ok, so am trying to land it