| === igitoor_ is now known as igitoor | ||
| FourDollars | Hi, I am trying to test the webhook usage for lp:~oem-solutions-engineers/oem-dev-tools/+git/oem-scripts but it won't call the webhook I added. Is there any problem? | 04:31 |
|---|---|---|
| FourDollars | Recent deliveries of https://code.launchpad.net/~oem-solutions-engineers/oem-dev-tools/+git/oem-scripts/+webhook/13229 is always empty. Although I made https://code.launchpad.net/~fourdollars/oem-dev-tools/+git/oem-scripts/+merge/384887 for it. | 04:31 |
| FourDollars | But it works fine if I added the webhook on lp:~fourdollars/oem-dev-tools/+git/oem-scripts. | 04:31 |
| FourDollars | How can I use the webhook on lp:~oem-solutions-engineers/oem-dev-tools/+git/oem-scripts? | 04:31 |
| wgrant | FourDollars: What's the event configuration for the webhook? | 04:38 |
| FourDollars | wgrant: Enabled git push,merge proposal, active and use secret. | 04:40 |
| === wgrant changed the topic of #launchpad to: Help contact: pappacena (12:00-21:00 UTC) | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support and spam reporting: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | ||
| wgrant | FourDollars: There are some complications around webhooks for private repositories, but it all looks right to me. If you have the merge-proposal:0.1 event type selected, it'll need some more digging that I can't really do right now - best if you can wait guntil the help contact is around, or ask asynchronously on https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad. | 04:44 |
| FourDollars | wgrant: OK. Thx. | 04:45 |
| wgrant | Oh, I think I may see the problem. It looks like it might assume that the owner of the repository is always a user rather than a team. But that's only from a quick glance. | 04:48 |
| FourDollars | Yes | 04:48 |
| FourDollars | It is weird that I can add the webhook on the team's Git private repositories but it won't delivery the events. | 04:52 |
| wgrant | FourDollars: Bugs are weird, yes :) | 04:56 |
| wgrant | But merge proposal privacy is more complicated than just one repository. | 04:57 |
| FourDollars | OK. I have asked the question on https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/691066. | 04:57 |
| === SpecialK|Canon changed the topic of #launchpad to: Help contact: SpecialK|Canon (08:00-17:00 UTC) | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support and spam reporting: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | ||
| LocutusOfBorg | hello, is launchpad having a sad day? | 09:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | builders seems to be stuck, or not completing anything useful | 09:35 |
| SpecialK|Canon | Hm, they definitely look a smidge unhappy don't they - I'll take a look | 09:42 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks | 10:09 |
| SpecialK|Canon | LocutusOfBorg: Right, that should do it - things look a bit happier now - I'll keep an eye on the queue to make sure that continues | 10:18 |
| LocutusOfBorg | not sure SpecialK|Canon but I still smell some sadness... | 10:53 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-monad-par-extras/0.3.3-11/+build/19388304 | 10:53 |
| SpecialK|Canon | LocutusOfBorg: Hm, I think that's a different manifestation of sadness, I'll take a look | 10:55 |
| cjwatson | May just be backlogged after the restart. | 10:55 |
| cjwatson | That particular bit isn't buildd-manager, it's a queue that's processed serially. | 10:55 |
| LocutusOfBorg | oh, ok so even if haskell libraries are not so heavy, stuff previously in the queue might be | 10:56 |
| LocutusOfBorg | makes sense thanks | 10:56 |
| cjwatson | And I see it just processed | 10:56 |
| cjwatson | previously in the queue> right, exactly | 10:57 |
| cjwatson | 2020-06-01 10:51:28 DEBUG firefox-trunk_78.0~a1~hg20200531r533157-0ubuntu0.19.10.1~umd1_amd64.changes can be unsigned. | 10:57 |
| cjwatson | for example :) | 10:57 |
| cjwatson | (that's slightly unfair, the time in this case was actually mostly kernels) | 10:57 |
| LocutusOfBorg | :D thanks twice! | 10:58 |
| SpecialK|Canon | Cheers | 11:00 |
| rbasak | Similar to bug 1860456, I'm getting a "500 Internal Server Error" when I try https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcefiles/apache2/2.2.8-1ubuntu0.4/apache2_2.2.8-1ubuntu0.4.dsc | 12:51 |
| ubot5 | bug 1860456 in usd-importer "ubuntutools.archive.UbuntuSourcePackage().pull() fails" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1860456 | 12:51 |
| rbasak | Steps to reproduce: on Focal, with python3-ubuntutools 0.176 | 12:51 |
| rbasak | ubuntutools.archive.UbuntuSourcePackage('apache2', '2.2.8-1ubuntu0.4').pull() | 12:51 |
| rbasak | ^ help please SpecialK|Canon? | 12:52 |
| rbasak | Colin knows the background but I'm aware you should be asked first :) | 12:52 |
| SpecialK|Canon | rbasak: Taking a look | 13:02 |
| SpecialK|Canon | rbasak: Could you file a bug about it please; given +sf/sn/sv/filename should be unambiguous, certainly something's not right there | 13:32 |
| rbasak | SpecialK|Canon: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1881598 - thanks! | 13:36 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1881598 in ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) "ubuntutools.archive.UbuntuSourcePackage().pull() fails (take 2)" [Undecided,New] | 13:36 |
| rbasak | Do you want a task against Launchpad also? | 13:36 |
| cjwatson | It's a Launchpad bug | 13:43 |
| cjwatson | Not ubuntu-dev-tools | 13:43 |
| rbasak | OK, changed. | 13:46 |
| SpecialK|Canon | rbasak: What's the concrete impact here? Looks like we have data issues (of the "we've ended up with two and that shouldn't happen" kind) - is this blocking you from anything at all or are we free to attempt to wrangle the inconsistency? | 13:54 |
| rbasak | SpecialK|Canon: it sort of blocks me from reimporting everything in main to git-ubuntu's now consistent standard, so I can declare all branches stable. I'd prefer not to have to say "all branches but X and Y are stable" though obviously that is an intermediate step. I would prefer not to work around it by injecting a dsc from somewhere else in case that inadvertently produces a non-reproducible result, | 13:56 |
| rbasak | though I can do that if necessary. | 13:56 |
| SpecialK|Canon | rbasak: Right, thanks | 13:57 |
| rbasak | (we already have code to inject a different source dsc URL for a particular package and version, so actually doing it is trivial) | 13:57 |
| cjwatson | I think we should probably discuss it in our team weekly tomorrow, if you can tolerate that much delay | 13:57 |
| cjwatson | It's not a straightforward situation | 13:58 |
| rbasak | Sure. | 13:58 |
| SpecialK|Canon | We have https://launchpadlibrarian.net/23154047/apache2_2.2.8-1ubuntu0.4.dsc and https://launchpadlibrarian.net/23719959/apache2_2.2.8-1ubuntu0.4.dsc so something's clearly gone wrong, but unpicking it is nontrivial as cjwatson says | 13:58 |
| rbasak | Sorry, I didn't say anything about timescales. | 13:58 |
| cjwatson | FWIW it looks like a historical copier bug | 13:58 |
| rbasak | If it's fixed in a couple of weeks I won't even really notice - I have plenty of other things to do before then. | 13:58 |
| cjwatson | https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/fXfpzbGt7R/ is the diff between the two versions in question | 13:58 |
| SpecialK|Canon | rbasak: Ah, fabulous, thanks | 13:59 |
| cjwatson | (the bug being that it didn't notice the conflict and refuse the copy) | 13:59 |
| ricotz | hi :), seems like the s390x builders have a problem | 20:07 |
| cjwatson | s390x builders should be back now | 21:51 |
| RikMills | \o/ | 21:54 |
| cjwatson | Maybe. A little bit. | 22:18 |
| cjwatson | But I'm very EOD | 22:18 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!