=== igitoor_ is now known as igitoor [04:31] Hi, I am trying to test the webhook usage for lp:~oem-solutions-engineers/oem-dev-tools/+git/oem-scripts but it won't call the webhook I added. Is there any problem? [04:31] Recent deliveries of https://code.launchpad.net/~oem-solutions-engineers/oem-dev-tools/+git/oem-scripts/+webhook/13229 is always empty. Although I made https://code.launchpad.net/~fourdollars/oem-dev-tools/+git/oem-scripts/+merge/384887 for it. [04:31] But it works fine if I added the webhook on lp:~fourdollars/oem-dev-tools/+git/oem-scripts. [04:31] How can I use the webhook on lp:~oem-solutions-engineers/oem-dev-tools/+git/oem-scripts? [04:38] FourDollars: What's the event configuration for the webhook? [04:40] wgrant: Enabled git push,merge proposal, active and use secret. === wgrant changed the topic of #launchpad to: Help contact: pappacena (12:00-21:00 UTC) | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support and spam reporting: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad [04:44] FourDollars: There are some complications around webhooks for private repositories, but it all looks right to me. If you have the merge-proposal:0.1 event type selected, it'll need some more digging that I can't really do right now - best if you can wait guntil the help contact is around, or ask asynchronously on https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad. [04:45] wgrant: OK. Thx. [04:48] Oh, I think I may see the problem. It looks like it might assume that the owner of the repository is always a user rather than a team. But that's only from a quick glance. [04:48] Yes [04:52] It is weird that I can add the webhook on the team's Git private repositories but it won't delivery the events. [04:56] FourDollars: Bugs are weird, yes :) [04:57] But merge proposal privacy is more complicated than just one repository. [04:57] OK. I have asked the question on https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/691066. === SpecialK|Canon changed the topic of #launchpad to: Help contact: SpecialK|Canon (08:00-17:00 UTC) | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support and spam reporting: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad [09:35] hello, is launchpad having a sad day? [09:35] builders seems to be stuck, or not completing anything useful [09:42] Hm, they definitely look a smidge unhappy don't they - I'll take a look [10:09] thanks [10:18] LocutusOfBorg: Right, that should do it - things look a bit happier now - I'll keep an eye on the queue to make sure that continues [10:53] not sure SpecialK|Canon but I still smell some sadness... [10:53] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-monad-par-extras/0.3.3-11/+build/19388304 [10:55] LocutusOfBorg: Hm, I think that's a different manifestation of sadness, I'll take a look [10:55] May just be backlogged after the restart. [10:55] That particular bit isn't buildd-manager, it's a queue that's processed serially. [10:56] oh, ok so even if haskell libraries are not so heavy, stuff previously in the queue might be [10:56] makes sense thanks [10:56] And I see it just processed [10:57] previously in the queue> right, exactly [10:57] 2020-06-01 10:51:28 DEBUG firefox-trunk_78.0~a1~hg20200531r533157-0ubuntu0.19.10.1~umd1_amd64.changes can be unsigned. [10:57] for example :) [10:57] (that's slightly unfair, the time in this case was actually mostly kernels) [10:58] :D thanks twice! [11:00] Cheers [12:51] Similar to bug 1860456, I'm getting a "500 Internal Server Error" when I try https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcefiles/apache2/2.2.8-1ubuntu0.4/apache2_2.2.8-1ubuntu0.4.dsc [12:51] bug 1860456 in usd-importer "ubuntutools.archive.UbuntuSourcePackage().pull() fails" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1860456 [12:51] Steps to reproduce: on Focal, with python3-ubuntutools 0.176 [12:51] ubuntutools.archive.UbuntuSourcePackage('apache2', '2.2.8-1ubuntu0.4').pull() [12:52] ^ help please SpecialK|Canon? [12:52] Colin knows the background but I'm aware you should be asked first :) [13:02] rbasak: Taking a look [13:32] rbasak: Could you file a bug about it please; given +sf/sn/sv/filename should be unambiguous, certainly something's not right there [13:36] SpecialK|Canon: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1881598 - thanks! [13:36] Ubuntu bug 1881598 in ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) "ubuntutools.archive.UbuntuSourcePackage().pull() fails (take 2)" [Undecided,New] [13:36] Do you want a task against Launchpad also? [13:43] It's a Launchpad bug [13:43] Not ubuntu-dev-tools [13:46] OK, changed. [13:54] rbasak: What's the concrete impact here? Looks like we have data issues (of the "we've ended up with two and that shouldn't happen" kind) - is this blocking you from anything at all or are we free to attempt to wrangle the inconsistency? [13:56] SpecialK|Canon: it sort of blocks me from reimporting everything in main to git-ubuntu's now consistent standard, so I can declare all branches stable. I'd prefer not to have to say "all branches but X and Y are stable" though obviously that is an intermediate step. I would prefer not to work around it by injecting a dsc from somewhere else in case that inadvertently produces a non-reproducible result, [13:56] though I can do that if necessary. [13:57] rbasak: Right, thanks [13:57] (we already have code to inject a different source dsc URL for a particular package and version, so actually doing it is trivial) [13:57] I think we should probably discuss it in our team weekly tomorrow, if you can tolerate that much delay [13:58] It's not a straightforward situation [13:58] Sure. [13:58] We have https://launchpadlibrarian.net/23154047/apache2_2.2.8-1ubuntu0.4.dsc and https://launchpadlibrarian.net/23719959/apache2_2.2.8-1ubuntu0.4.dsc so something's clearly gone wrong, but unpicking it is nontrivial as cjwatson says [13:58] Sorry, I didn't say anything about timescales. [13:58] FWIW it looks like a historical copier bug [13:58] If it's fixed in a couple of weeks I won't even really notice - I have plenty of other things to do before then. [13:58] https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/fXfpzbGt7R/ is the diff between the two versions in question [13:59] rbasak: Ah, fabulous, thanks [13:59] (the bug being that it didn't notice the conflict and refuse the copy) [20:07] hi :), seems like the s390x builders have a problem [21:51] s390x builders should be back now [21:54] \o/ [22:18] Maybe. A little bit. [22:18] But I'm very EOD