[00:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: paraglob [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[00:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.13.2+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[00:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.13.2+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[00:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.13.2+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[01:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: petsc4py [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.13.0-2] (no packageset)
[01:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.13.2+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[04:36] <amurray> vorlon: we (security) are wanting to SRU libseccomp 2.4.3 back to f/e/b/x via -security - I've prepared it all via LP #1876055 but haven't had any luck getting it reviewed by the SRU team - since this is wanted as part of UC20 it is time-sensitive - how can I get more visibility for it to be reviewed? Updates are ready and sitting in the security-proposed PPA
[04:36] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1876055 in libseccomp (Ubuntu Groovy) "SRU: Backport 2.4.3-1ubuntu2 from groovy to focal/eoan/bionic/xenial for newer syscalls for core20 base" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1876055
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ordered-map [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.8.1-2] (no packageset)
[05:17] <ginggs> vorlon: np, i figured it out.  i was doing them by dependency layer.
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ordered-map [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.8.1-2] (no packageset)
[05:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ordered-map [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.8.1-2] (no packageset)
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ordered-map [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.8.1-2] (no packageset)
[05:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ordered-map [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.8.1-2] (no packageset)
[05:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ordered-map [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.8.1-2] (no packageset)
[07:32] <LocutusOfBorg> hello, please reject lvm2 from focal unapproved queue
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ceph [source] (bionic-proposed) [12.2.13-0ubuntu0.18.04.2]
[07:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lvm2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.03.07-1ubuntu1.20.04.1]
[08:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shadow (focal-proposed/main) [1:4.8.1-1ubuntu5 => 1:4.8.1-1ubuntu6] (core, i386-whitelist)
[08:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shadow [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.8.1-1ubuntu6]
[08:58] <xnox> amurray:  i do not believe this is time sensitive for uc20, as we already have something similar via image ppa.
[09:04] <LocutusOfBorg> xnox, I found your initramfs-tools upload in focal unapproved queue
[09:04] <LocutusOfBorg> I merged your changes and the new changes from the other pending SRU into one single one
[09:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: initramfs-tools (focal-proposed/main) [0.136ubuntu6 => 0.136ubuntu6.20.04.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[09:05] <LocutusOfBorg> ^^ any any archive admin please reject all the previous uploads of this package in unapproved queue?
[09:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected initramfs-tools [source] (focal-proposed) [0.136ubuntu6.1]
[09:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected initramfs-tools [source] (focal-proposed) [0.136ubuntu6.20.04.3]
[09:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected initramfs-tools [source] (focal-proposed) [0.136ubuntu6.20.04.1]
[09:27] <vorlon> amurray: right, SRUs are normally processed via the launchpad upload queues and not via SRU bugs.  And if it's being done in the security pocket it doesn't normally need SRU team input. Are you planning to put it to -proposed before publishing to -security? If so probably best to copy-package -b to the -proposed queue and then ping the SRU team member on duty for the day
[09:28] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  well, there will be more initramfs-tools backports..... but yeah lvm2 & arm fix would be nice to go in.
[09:28] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  but by doing this, we are at the back of the queue again =)
[09:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-settings (focal-proposed/main) [440.64-0ubuntu1 => 440.82-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-settings (bionic-proposed/main) [440.44-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 440.82-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[10:24] <RikMills> we now have libjs-jquery 3.3.1~dfsg-3 from src:jquery in main and libjs-jquery 3.5.1+dfsg-4 from src:node-jquery in universe
[10:24] <RikMills> debian have removed src:jquery
[10:24] <RikMills> anyone looking at this?
[10:44] <amurray> vorlon: no we weren't planning to go via -proposed but wanted SRU team
[10:45] <amurray> wanted SRU teams blessing due to version update for most releases
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openbabel [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.1.1+dfsg-2] (kubuntu)
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openbabel [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.1.1+dfsg-2] (kubuntu)
[11:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openbabel [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.1.1+dfsg-2] (kubuntu)
[12:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openbabel [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.1.1+dfsg-2] (kubuntu)
[12:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openbabel [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.1.1+dfsg-2] (kubuntu)
[12:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1021.23~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1021.23~18.04.1]
[12:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gummi (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7.999-1 => 0.8.1-1ubuntu0.20.04.1] (no packageset)
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: containerd [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [1.3.4-0ubuntu5] (no packageset)
[13:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openbabel [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.1.1+dfsg-2] (kubuntu)
[13:49] <coreycb> hello SRU team, the OpenStack Ussuri packages should be all set to release to focal-updates
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (focal-proposed/main) [1:0.8.1.1 => 1:0.8.4~0.20.04.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[14:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-181.211] (core, kernel)
[16:25] <vorlon> amurray: I don't regard this as something that requires SRU team "blessing"; if you're looking for a technical review, I think talking to the SRU team member of the day is still best
[16:28] <vorlon> yuck why does r-cran-knitr depend on node-highlight.js, that's going to be a problem for R on riscv64
[17:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-181.211]
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (focal-proposed/main) [2.20.11-0ubuntu27.2 => 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.3] (core, i386-whitelist)
[19:19] <hellsworth> hi sil2100: would you please take a look at libreoffice 6.4.4 stuck in unapproved
[19:20] <hellsworth> #1856446
[19:20] <hellsworth> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1856446
[19:20] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1856446 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Eoan) "[SRU] libreoffice 6.3.4 for eoan" [High,Fix released]
[19:20] <hellsworth> oh sorry wrong link..
[19:20] <hellsworth> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1881007
[19:20] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1881007 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] libreoffice 6.4.4 for focal" [High,In progress]
[20:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added jsunit to mozilla in bionic
[20:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added jsunit to mozilla in eoan
[20:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added jsunit to mozilla in xenial
[22:27] <xnox> vorlon:  i'm confused on how to test for i386 any more.
[22:28] <xnox> is there any environment variable that indicates which arch things are being tested for?
[22:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-103.104] (core, kernel)
[22:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-103.104~16.04.1] (kernel)
[22:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-103.104~16.04.1] (kernel)
[22:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-103.104] (core, kernel)
[23:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1054.59] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libplacebo [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.29.1+dfsg1-2] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libplacebo [i386] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.29.1+dfsg1-2] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libplacebo [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.29.1+dfsg1-2] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libplacebo [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.29.1+dfsg1-2] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libplacebo [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.29.1+dfsg1-2] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libplacebo [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.29.1+dfsg1-2] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)