| tumbleweed | upstreams tend to have far narrower view of architecture support than we do | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: clamav (bionic-proposed/main) [0.102.3+dfsg-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 0.102.3+dfsg-0ubuntu0.18.04.2] (ubuntu-server) | 00:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted inkscape [source] (focal-proposed) [0.92.5-1ubuntu1.1] | 02:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (focal-proposed) [0.8.3-1ubuntu12.1] | 03:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected pegjs [source] (focal-proposed) [0.10.0-3~ubuntu1.20.04.1] | 03:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pegjs [source] (focal-proposed) [0.10.0-3~ubuntu1.20.04.1] | 05:22 | |
| === M_hc[m] is now known as _hc | ||
| cpaelzer | Policy question: I found a Debian package that places a .list file in /etc/apt/sources.list.d that enables buster-backports - that won't ever work well in Ubuntu, but is that as bad as needing a package removal? | 07:05 |
| cpaelzer | I could file a removal request and leave it to the decision of the ubuntu-archive member handling it, but if there is a pre-discussion to be had I'm all for it | 07:06 |
| cpaelzer | doko: seb128: apw: you are thre AAs that might be around atm - opinions on ^^ ? | 07:06 |
| doko | which package is this? | 07:07 |
| RAOF | cpaelzer: Is there a reason not to simply upload a new version that removes that .list file? | 07:07 |
| RAOF | Because removal from the archive is not going to unbreak systems which have already installed it. | 07:07 |
| cpaelzer | package is freedombox of src:plinth | 07:08 |
| cpaelzer | RAOF: we'd then have Delta to maintain, do regular merges on a rather complex (as it seems) package and TBH I don't know if things of that package will work well then. They must have had a reason to add this (changelog mentions it is there to make some of their components installable) | 07:09 |
| cpaelzer | I'm not saying we can't just stop it from doing so | 07:09 |
| cpaelzer | but this isn't a package I want to regularly look at and update | 07:09 |
| cpaelzer | I'd rather file a bug with Debian to stop doing so - at least if running on Ubuntu and derivatives | 07:10 |
| cpaelzer | it is blocked in proposed due to this behavior, so we won't get a new version until this is somehow solved | 07:10 |
| doko | even for Debian, should be RC severity | 07:10 |
| cpaelzer | how about this approach, I'll file a LP bug and mark it update-excuse (to avoid others doignt he same debug) and a Debian RC bug describing the issue | 07:11 |
| RAOF | “We need to add an extra repository so that we can install our stuff” sounds like it should be in that extra repository :) | 07:11 |
| cpaelzer | then we can see what happens | 07:11 |
| doko | 19.0 has " * upgrades: Fix premature adding of buster-backports sources" | 07:11 |
| cpaelzer | doko: it came back in between 20.3 and 20.10 | 07:11 |
| cpaelzer | I feel good now, thanks for the discussion doko and RAOF - I think filing the bugs is a good approach | 07:12 |
| cpaelzer | it doesn't stop anything else atm, so it isn't super-urgent to be unblocked | 07:12 |
| cpaelzer | doko: can you erfer to a particular part of the Debian policy that makes this a RC bug so I could refer to it in my bug? | 07:12 |
| doko | a package should not mess with sources ... I mean, google-chrome is doing the same, but that's an archive with just one packge | 07:12 |
| doko | no | 07:13 |
| doko | but it adds sources without informing the user ... backports ... | 07:13 |
| cpaelzer | thank you for the discussion doko and RAOF | 07:16 |
| doko | sil2100, apw: please ignore the rapmap autopkg test for any version, for any arch except for amd64. the package is only built there | 08:44 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc4py [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.13.0-2build1] (no packageset) | 09:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc4py [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.13.0-2build1] (no packageset) | 09:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc4py [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.13.0-2build1] (no packageset) | 09:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc4py [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.13.0-2build1] (no packageset) | 09:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc4py [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.13.0-2build1] (no packageset) | 09:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc4py [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.13.0-2build1] (no packageset) | 09:36 | |
| ricotz | hello, could someone please take a look at vala 0.40.23-0ubuntu1 which is waiting in the bionic queue | 11:18 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mandelbulber2 [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.20-2] (no packageset) | 11:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mandelbulber2 [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.20-2] (no packageset) | 11:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mandelbulber2 [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.20-2] (no packageset) | 11:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slepc4py [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [3.13.0-2] | 11:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slepc4py [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [3.13.0-2] | 11:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slepc4py [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [3.13.0-2] | 11:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slepc4py [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [3.13.0-2build1] | 11:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slepc4py [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [3.13.0-2build1] | 11:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slepc4py [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [3.13.0-2build1] | 11:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slepc4py [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [3.13.0-2] | 11:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slepc4py [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [3.13.0-2] | 11:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slepc4py [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [3.13.0-2build1] | 11:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slepc4py [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [3.13.0-2] | 11:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slepc4py [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [3.13.0-2build1] | 11:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slepc4py [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [3.13.0-2build1] | 11:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted containerd [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.4-0ubuntu4] | 11:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted containerd [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.4-0ubuntu5] | 11:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpod [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.6.4+dfsg1-3ubuntu1] | 11:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpod [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.6.4+dfsg1-3ubuntu1] | 11:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpod [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.6.4+dfsg1-3ubuntu1] | 11:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nomad [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.10.5+dfsg1-1ubuntu1] | 11:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpod [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.6.4+dfsg1-3ubuntu1] | 11:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpod [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.6.4+dfsg1-3ubuntu1] | 11:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpod [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.6.4+dfsg1-3ubuntu1] | 11:26 | |
| doko | mwhudson: rustc on riscv64: Missing build dependencies: rustc (>= 1.42.0+dfsg) | 11:27 |
| doko | built in focal | 11:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lsp-plugins [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.1.22-0ubuntu1] | 11:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lsp-plugins [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.1.22-0ubuntu1] | 11:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lsp-plugins [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.1.22-0ubuntu1] | 11:29 | |
| mwhudson | doko: yes, i don't understand what is going on | 11:42 |
| mwhudson | (latest rustc ftbfs) | 11:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mandelbulber2 [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.20-2] (no packageset) | 11:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mandelbulber2 [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.20-2] (no packageset) | 11:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: busybox (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.30.1-4ubuntu6 => 1:1.30.1-4ubuntu6.1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 11:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nomad-driver-lxc [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 12:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nomad-driver-lxc [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 12:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nomad-driver-lxc [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 12:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nomad-driver-lxc [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 12:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nomad-driver-lxc [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 12:43 | |
| doko | mwhudson: you mean, rustc 1.42? | 13:05 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: libnma (groovy-proposed/primary) [1.8.28-2] | 13:25 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | can anybody please approve it? ^^ it is split out from the new network-manager-applet source package | 13:29 |
| LocutusOfBorg | seb128, ^^ | 13:29 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, I'm unsure in what order things should go, it would probably make sense to wait for n-m-applet to be uploaded so they are a consistent set? | 13:31 |
| LocutusOfBorg | the problem is that if I upload, it will be BD_unistallable until the libnma is done | 13:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'm updating the git repo | 13:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ok I failed to do the git stuff | 13:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and uploaded in Ubuntu | 13:36 |
| LocutusOfBorg | do you think you can import the version on git? | 13:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-ucm-conf (focal-proposed/main) [1.2.2-1 => 1.2.2-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) | 13:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vala [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.40.23-0ubuntu1] | 14:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnma [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.8.28-2] | 14:24 | |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, k, accepted, please follow up next with the applet :) | 14:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnma [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.8.28-2] (no packageset) | 14:26 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | seb128, applet is already uploaded, please sync the git with the changes if you can :D | 14:30 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, hum, why didn't you use the vcs? | 14:31 |
| LocutusOfBorg | seb128, I'm not sure about how to proceed | 14:31 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted djvulibre [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.5.27.1-8ubuntu0.2] | 14:31 | |
| seb128 | shrug | 14:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I mean, I can git push, but I don't want to mess with your workflow | 14:32 |
| ricotz | rbasak, thank you for processing vala/bionic | 14:32 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gjs (focal-proposed/main) [1.64.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.1 => 1.64.3-1~ubuntu20.04.1] (desktop-core, desktop-extra, i386-whitelist, mozilla) | 14:32 | |
| rbasak | ricotz: yw! | 14:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | seb128, let me know if I can git push, this is where I pushed changes https://github.com/LocutusOfBorg/ubuntu-applet | 14:37 |
| cpaelzer | hmm, this is FTFBS proliferation - is there a tool that allows me "restart all builds on src:haskell-* that are in groovy-proposed and failed to build" ? | 14:50 |
| cpaelzer | I might eventually need to be a bit more granular on the "haskell-*" part, but does such a tool exist at all? | 14:50 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, did you git merge from salsa? | 14:52 |
| LocutusOfBorg | seb128, I failed in doing it | 14:53 |
| seb128 | shrug | 14:53 |
| seb128 | it's becoming more work now that I had done it myself :/ | 14:53 |
| cjwatson | cpaelzer: That's all scriptable using the API but I'm not aware of a tool | 14:54 |
| cpaelzer | ok, thanks cjwatson | 14:56 |
| cpaelzer | if I end up with more than 50-100 I might take a look at the API then | 14:56 |
| cpaelzer | thanks | 14:56 |
| LocutusOfBorg | can anybody please accept libnma-common from queue? | 15:04 |
| doko | seb128: why do you demote childsplay, and don't remove it? | 15:05 |
| seb128 | doko, in case someone wants to fix it, Debian didn't remove it yet either ... but feel free if you prefer | 15:06 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, NEWed | 15:06 |
| doko | seb128: the dependency won't come back, so it will require a new upload | 15:06 |
| seb128 | right | 15:07 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnma [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.8.28-2] | 15:07 | |
| doko | and it's removed from testing | 15:07 |
| seb128 | but it's listed on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html this way | 15:07 |
| seb128 | anyway, feel free to remove it if you prefer, I don't care much either way | 15:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks | 15:07 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected docker.io [source] (focal-proposed) [19.03.8-0ubuntu1.20.04] | 15:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-keyring [source] (xenial-proposed) [2012.05.19.1] | 16:40 | |
| Laney | woot | 16:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.10 => 1:20.04.10.1] (core) | 17:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mandelbulber2 [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.20-2] (no packageset) | 18:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected apport [source] (focal-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu27.3] | 18:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (bionic-proposed/main) [1:18.04.11.12 => 1:18.04.11.13] (core) | 19:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (eoan-proposed/main) [1:19.04.8 => 1:19.04.8.1] (core) | 19:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: initramfs-tools (focal-proposed/main) [0.136ubuntu6 => 0.136ubuntu6.1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 19:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected initramfs-tools [source] (focal-proposed) [0.136ubuntu6.20.04.1] | 19:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (focal-proposed/main) [2.20.11-0ubuntu27.2 => 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.3] (core, i386-whitelist) | 19:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (eoan-proposed/main) [19.4-33-gbb4131a2-0ubuntu1~19.10.1 => 20.2-45-g5f7825e2-0ubuntu1~19.10.1] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud) | 21:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (bionic-proposed/main) [19.4-33-gbb4131a2-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 20.2-45-g5f7825e2-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) | 21:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (focal-proposed/main) [20.1-10-g71af48df-0ubuntu5 => 20.2-45-g5f7825e2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud) | 21:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (bionic-proposed/main) [19.4-33-gbb4131a2-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 20.2-45-g5f7825e2-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) | 22:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (eoan-proposed/main) [19.4-33-gbb4131a2-0ubuntu1~19.10.1 => 20.2-45-g5f7825e2-0ubuntu1~19.10.1] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud) | 22:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted initramfs-tools [source] (focal-proposed) [0.136ubuntu6.1] | 22:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyqt5-sip [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [12.8.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:41 | |
| mwhudson | ubuntu-archive can someone reject https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=golang-1.14 i want to add another patch | 23:44 |
| RAOF | mwhudson: Done. | 23:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected golang-1.14 [source] (focal-proposed) [1.14.3-2ubuntu1~20.04.1] | 23:57 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!