| === pieq_ is now known as pieq | ||
| cpaelzer | oSoMoN: seb128: doko: xnox: (wow +1 pinigng is a nice long list today) - I updated https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PlusOneMaintenanceTeam/Status again as I was checking my ongoing +1 activities. That should be fine for initial coordination | 06:15 |
|---|---|---|
| cpaelzer | once I start something else after breakfast (all current things are waiting on something/someone) I'll let you know | 06:16 |
| cpaelzer | six and python-azure things are fully completed and migrated | 06:19 |
| * tsimonq2 loves all of the +1 maintenance activity | 06:21 | |
| cpaelzer | thanks tsimonq2 | 06:26 |
| cpaelzer | I'm afraid if I send my mail at the end of my double week it will be a book and no one will read it | 06:26 |
| cpaelzer | maybe I should send at the end of each week ... | 06:26 |
| tsimonq2 | cpaelzer: Was speaking generally, but each person makes up a chunk of that, so you're welcome. | 06:27 |
| tsimonq2 | If only there was a more centralized way to provide an audit log of sorts. | 06:27 |
| tsimonq2 | So e.g. on a daily basis, interested people could just look there. | 06:28 |
| tsimonq2 | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ | 06:28 |
| cpaelzer | we (all) need to find which way of commuication works best to a) do not feel like a burden/pain but b) gets out to the people so everyone can see and is aware what is going on | 06:28 |
| tsimonq2 | That's agreeable. | 06:30 |
| eoli3n_ | Hi | 06:33 |
| eoli3n_ | i don't get what changed about netboot : http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/netboot/focal/ | 06:33 |
| eoli3n_ | can't i get focal netboot image ? | 06:33 |
| eoli3n_ | ok found : http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/dists/focal/main/installer-arm64/current/legacy-images/netboot/ | 06:37 |
| cpaelzer | oSoMoN: seb128: doko: xnox: there is a test fail in lintian for the new libclass-xsaccessor-perl, I'll look at that next since this eventually will be needed for the overall perl things to complete | 07:08 |
| seb128 | hey cpaelzer, k | 07:09 |
| eoli3n_ | arm... not amd | 07:15 |
| eoli3n_ | so where can i get focal netboot please ? | 07:15 |
| eoli3n_ | http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/focal/main/installer-amd64/current/legacy-images/netboot/ | 07:18 |
| cpaelzer | eoli3n_: that is the legacy build like you were used to it - alternatively you might follow http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/netboot/ to http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/netboot/focal/ which will lead you to https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/netbooting-the-live-server-installer/14510 | 07:20 |
| cpaelzer | worth a read to consider this going forward | 07:20 |
| eoli3n_ | i have my own netboot server since many years with a kickstart file etc... | 07:20 |
| eoli3n_ | don't stop to provide legacy netboot for next releases | 07:21 |
| LocutusOfBorg | seb128, I think a better pulseaudio/riscv64 would have been this patch https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-audio-dev/pulseaudio/commit/?h=ubuntu&id=40db304aba4f2258edfb3d524787b1e0f22baacb | 07:23 |
| LocutusOfBorg | what is your opinion? | 07:23 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, the test does work on other archs but maybe yes, ideally that would be upstreamed | 07:27 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, it does sound similar to https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pulseaudio/pulseaudio/-/issues/619 , they fixed it by disabling the ffmath option but that's on for us it seems, maybe the patch to the test there would still make sense | 07:28 |
| xnox | @pilot in | 08:44 |
| === udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Open | 20.04 Released! | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Trusty-Focal | If you can't send messages here, authenticate to NickServ first | Patch Pilots: xnox | ||
| xnox | I am here working on +1 maintenance = meaning all things groovy. If you have anything not in groovy or stuck in groovy-proposed, ask me to help getting it moving! | 08:45 |
| Unit193 | \o/ | 08:46 |
| oSoMoN | xnox, this is my first +1 maintenance shift, I'm not familiar with good practices yet, am I supposed to also @pilot in/out when I start/end my day? | 09:12 |
| oSoMoN | or are you doing both +1 maintenance and patch piloting today? | 09:13 |
| xnox | oSoMoN: I think we came up with idea of (ab)using pilon in on Tuesday for patch piloting. | 09:14 |
| xnox | oSoMoN: i.e. if there are any other +1 maintenance people without upload rights they know, that I am around to click autopkgtest retires for them, or like sponsor uploads. | 09:15 |
| oSoMoN | ack | 09:16 |
| xnox | *retries | 09:18 |
| LocutusOfBorg | cpaelzer, any timeline for qemu 5.0 in groovy? :) | 09:26 |
| cpaelzer | LocutusOfBorg: ~August | 09:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks :) | 09:34 |
| cpaelzer | sil2100: this week you looked at ntirpc/nfs-ganesha | 09:43 |
| cpaelzer | did you (or someone else) make nfs-ganesha a sync while doing so? | 09:43 |
| cpaelzer | because there is a component mismatch left, so one old delta at least needs to get back | 09:44 |
| cpaelzer | I can do that, but I wanted to know the intention/plan to not make things worse by making this a merge again | 09:44 |
| cpaelzer | oSoMoN: seb128: doko: xnox: I'll ping the NFS-ganesha merge that is needed to make ntirpc migrate | 09:54 |
| cpaelzer | s/ping/take/ | 09:54 |
| === CarwynNelson4 is now known as CarwynNelson | ||
| xnox | working on removal of ubuntu-app-launch & url-dispatcher without breaking anything that depends on it for the DE we actually ship | 09:58 |
| cpaelzer | ok,t hanks for the info xnox | 10:02 |
| doko | xnox: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950404 is awaiting feedback | 10:04 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 950404 in src:ndpi "ndpi FTBFS on arm64, i386, ppc64el and s390x due to test failures" [Serious,Open] | 10:05 |
| doko | RikMills: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nootka/1.2.0-0ubuntu4/+build/19239722 any idea? otoh the package could be removed, no rdeps | 10:07 |
| doko | not in Debian either | 10:07 |
| xnox | doko: i'm sorry that's out of scope for +1 maintainance in Ubuntu atm. ndpi is not blocked in groovy, is it? | 10:11 |
| RikMills | doko: nootka? had not heard of that. very out of date (1.2 vs latest 1.4.7), and their website supplies ubuntu debs. I guess I could work to update it, but have zero motivation to do so and maintain/support it | 10:17 |
| * RikMills guesses removal bug is required | 10:19 | |
| RikMills | if people want it, looks like a snap candidate | 10:19 |
| RikMills | \o/ they have a flatpak and an android version in the play store as well | 10:20 |
| doko | RikMills: could you file one? | 10:25 |
| RikMills | LP: #1880630 | 10:25 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1880630 in nootka (Ubuntu) "Please remove nootka from Ubuntu" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1880630 | 10:25 |
| doko | ta | 10:25 |
| RikMills | looks like already done. I have commented with context | 10:25 |
| doko | ahh, there already was one | 10:25 |
| juliank | Make experts! How do I write ".man.8: Makefile" correctly? | 10:28 |
| juliank | because this triggers "warning: ignoring prerequisites on suffix rule definition" | 10:28 |
| juliank | making it "%.8: %.man Makefile" makes automake complain that's gnu make stuff | 10:29 |
| juliank | Ah I see I need to get all explicit .8 targets and add depends for those | 10:31 |
| juliank | nasty | 10:31 |
| juliank | So, flatpak-builder says | 10:39 |
| juliank | echo Building | 10:39 |
| juliank | make: echo: Operation not permitted | 10:39 |
| juliank | on s390x | 10:39 |
| juliank | what am I supposed to do with that? | 10:39 |
| juliank | with make 4.3 | 10:39 |
| juliank | seems fine with older make | 10:40 |
| doko | waveform: is this supposed to build? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi2-5.4/5.4.0-1001.1build1 | 10:40 |
| doko | sforshee: ^^^ | 10:40 |
| cpaelzer | oSoMoN: seb128: doko: xnox: for ntirpc/nfs-ganesha this will be needed https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/nfs-ganesha/+git/nfs-ganesha/+merge/385106 - I'd appreciate if one could take a look for a sanity check | 10:44 |
| xnox | juliank: is it shell builtin, or /usr/bin/echo, what's stdout connect to? | 10:46 |
| * juliank probably should have tested the dpkg makefile & autoreconf upload before uploading it | 10:46 | |
| xnox | juliank: for example, normally there is no tty1 on s390x | 10:46 |
| juliank | xnox: I have no idea really, but this must have changed between make 4.2 and 4.3 | 10:46 |
| xnox | cure | 10:46 |
| juliank | probably could find out by recreating a stdout that is not writable? | 10:47 |
| xnox | *cute | 10:47 |
| xnox | juliank: where is it a problem? | 10:47 |
| xnox | it seems to build fine (i.e. dpkg is built now?!) | 10:47 |
| juliank | xnox: flatpak-builder autopkgtest | 10:48 |
| xnox | juliank: all we care is for make to be in groovy-proposed =) cause it's used to build all the things ;-) | 10:48 |
| juliank | looking at the log, this seems a real regression: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/flatpak-builder/groovy/s390x | 10:49 |
| juliank | because it only fails in the make 4.3 runs, but works in the ones betwee nthose | 10:49 |
| juliank | GNU make will now use posix_spawn() on systems where it is available. | 10:49 |
| juliank | ^ this? | 10:49 |
| xnox | juliank: ack. I can take a look into that on s390x box later today. | 10:50 |
| xnox | with like strace on fds | 10:50 |
| xnox | plus autopkgtests have multiple indirections of what stdout is | 10:50 |
| doko | RikMills: kopete was removed in Debian testing, because linphone was removed (ftbfs). can we remove it in Ubuntu too? | 10:51 |
| doko | or build it without libphone support | 10:51 |
| juliank | xnox: I could actually just investigate this on the autopkgtest infra directly with a --shell-fail rerun | 10:52 |
| juliank | ok, other cross-toolchain-base-* uploads to do, and then that's the remaining blocker for make-dfsg | 10:53 |
| juliank | :) | 10:53 |
| waveform | doko, no - we renamed linux-raspi2 to linux-raspi for focal, so it's only relevant on bionic at this point | 10:54 |
| doko | waveform: can we remove the package? | 11:06 |
| doko | if yes, please file a bug report and subscribe ubuntu-archive | 11:07 |
| waveform | doko, it's still used in bionic so I don't we can just yet | 11:07 |
| waveform | doko, (linux-raspi2 generally that is, not that particular version which only appears to be built for focal and groovy where it definitely isn't used) | 11:08 |
| doko | waveform: I'm talking about groovy | 11:09 |
| waveform | doko, in that case definitely - I'll file the issue | 11:09 |
| doko | ta | 11:09 |
| doko | waveform: so you filed a bug for linux-raspi2, but I asked for linux-raspi2-5.4. can both be removed? | 11:37 |
| seb128 | xnox, fftw3 i386 autopkgtest are still red with your fixes, did you notice? | 11:50 |
| xnox | seb128: i have | 11:51 |
| xnox | seb128: my next plan is to skip them. | 11:51 |
| seb128 | k | 11:51 |
| xnox | seb128: because i fail to comprehend how come cross compiler is installed, i386 library is installed, and yet it fails to use i386 search paths for libs. | 11:51 |
| xnox | seb128: but also, we only do native i386 building & testing cross-buildability of fftw3 is outofscope for i386-on-amd64 cross-autopkgtesting i think | 11:52 |
| oSoMoN | I have added a force-badtest for metis/i386, can someone from the release team please review/merge https://code.launchpad.net/~osomon/britney/hints-ubuntu-i386-badtests/+merge/385113 ? | 12:12 |
| === mfo_ is now known as mfo | ||
| cpaelzer | oSoMoN: seb128: doko: xnox: there is abunch of tests in excuses on ppc64 that failed with a infa error like "Creating nova instance ...ERROR: autopkgtest" | 12:35 |
| cpaelzer | oSoMoN: seb128: doko: xnox: I'd have gone for scanning test status for those cases and re-queue them | 12:35 |
| cpaelzer | or is anyone of you already on this? | 12:35 |
| oSoMoN | I'm not | 12:36 |
| seb128 | cpaelzer, I clicked some I saw on the by team excuse | 12:36 |
| seb128 | we really need those improvements to not requeue things already queued | 12:36 |
| cpaelzer | seb128: only on the Desktop "by team" ? | 12:36 |
| === antoine5 is now known as antoine | ||
| seb128 | cpaelzer, mostly, but I glanced over the foundations section as well and clicked a few there | 12:37 |
| === Enlik is now known as Guest52001 | ||
| waveform | doko, ah apologies - didn't realize that was a separate "project" in launchpad; linux-raspi2 itself should be removed at some point but I'm assuming we need to keep it alive whilst bionic is still supported | 12:48 |
| waveform | doko, I'll re-file | 12:48 |
| cpaelzer | seb128: ok you had gnutls28 but sepia and pinto are not in the per team view and not currently queued | 12:50 |
| cpaelzer | so I restarted those two | 12:50 |
| seb128 | cpaelzer, thanks | 12:50 |
| cpaelzer | oSoMoN: seb128: doko: xnox: FYI I'll be looking at jinja2/oca-core test fails | 12:52 |
| seb128 | k | 12:53 |
| RikMills | doko: kopete does not build depend on linphone any more as far as I can see. the previous linphone build depends are now provided with a higher version by the ortp and mediastreamer2 source packages | 12:55 |
| cpaelzer | oSoMoN: seb128: doko: xnox: lintian tests all passed as well now (one more peice in the perl puzzle) | 12:56 |
| RikMills | plus | 12:56 |
| RikMills | reverse-depends src:linphone | 12:56 |
| RikMills | No reverse dependencies found | 12:56 |
| === dannf is now known as dannf` | ||
| doko | $ reverse-depends -b src:linphone | 13:54 |
| doko | Reverse-Build-Depends | 13:54 |
| doko | * kopete (for libmediastreamer-dev) | 13:54 |
| doko | * kopete (for libortp-dev) | 13:54 |
| doko | RikMills: ^^^ | 13:54 |
| doko | hmm, ok | 13:54 |
| cpaelzer | oSoMoN: seb128: doko: xnox: jinja case resolved - it is indeed broken and should not migrate - I filed an updateexcuse bug so the next one looking at the queue is aware without re-debugging it | 14:28 |
| cpaelzer | I'm in meetings from now on, probably no more +1 cases for me today | 14:28 |
| eoli3n_ | what do i see ?? apt embeed snap packages now ? | 14:46 |
| eoli3n_ | does snap packages still doesn't work when home is not local..? | 14:47 |
| juliank | ddstreet: did you see me approving your software-properties branch? | 15:09 |
| juliank | (last thu) | 15:10 |
| juliank | seb128: you committed a change to software-properties repo middle of April, are you going to follow up on that? https://git.launchpad.net/software-properties/commit/?id=e375293fd8787f8a40b6eded51dde808f9d9cb09 | 15:12 |
| juliank | because it's not uploaded | 15:12 |
| seb128 | juliank, there was no hurry that's why I didn't upload, I though other changes would come at some point and it could wait for the next upload | 15:13 |
| juliank | seb128: ok | 15:14 |
| juliank | It's a small change anyway | 15:14 |
| === ErichEickmeyer is now known as Eickmeyer | ||
| oSoMoN | cpaelzer, seb128, xnox, doko : I went through all the rdeps of ttf-dejavu* that are blocking the migration of fonts-dejavu and I filed bugs/attached patches | 15:54 |
| xnox | oSoMoN: oooh nice! | 15:57 |
| xnox | @pilot out | 15:57 |
| === udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Open | 20.04 Released! | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Trusty-Focal | If you can't send messages here, authenticate to NickServ first | Patch Pilots: | ||
| * xnox is finishing up for the day, but i will be back tomorrow! | 15:57 | |
| ddstreet | juliank yes thanks, i'll try to get time to push it (if i have acl...) | 16:04 |
| juliank | it's ~ubuntu-core-dev owned iirc? | 16:06 |
| === AdmWiggin is now known as tianon | ||
| === ben_r_ is now known as ben_r | ||
| oSoMoN | I'm looking into the fontforge s390x build failures (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=961841) | 18:24 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 961841 in src:fontforge "fontforge FTBFS on 64bit big endian: test failures" [Serious,Open] | 18:24 |
| oSoMoN | that's encouraging: https://launchpad.net/~osomon/+archive/ubuntu/fontforge-bigendian-groovy/+build/19408615 | 18:33 |
| ahasenack | in focal, we have both golang 1.13 and 1.14, with 1.13 being the default | 19:49 |
| ahasenack | golang-defaults creates the symlinks from /usr/bin/go to the 1.13 binary somewhere in /usr/lib | 19:49 |
| ahasenack | is there sometihng that does the same for golang 1.14? Create the symlinks and such? Or should I do it by hand, if I want to use 1.14 in focal? | 19:50 |
| * ahasenack wonders if it's managed by alternatives | 19:51 | |
| ahasenack | no, looks like alternatives was used once upon a time, but not anymore | 19:51 |
| sarnold | ahasenack: it's my understanding that 1.14 is there for riscv64 -- I don't know if that's any help to you or not :) but I'm not sure the intention is to use 1.14 for non-riscv64 architectures | 19:51 |
| ahasenack | that's unexpected reasoning :) | 19:54 |
| * ahasenack tries the manual symlinks | 19:54 | |
| ahasenack | the thing built, so far so good | 19:55 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!