mwhudsonhah, that upload probably wouldn'00:00
mwhudsont have built anyway00:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: live-build (focal-proposed/main) [3.0~a57-1ubuntu38.20.04.1 => 3.0~a57-1ubuntu38.20.04.2] (desktop-core)00:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (focal-proposed/main) [2.20.11-0ubuntu27.2 => 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.3] (core, i386-whitelist)00:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected apport [source] (focal-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu27.3]00:59
=== pieq_ is now known as pieq
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyqt5-sip [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [12.8.0-1] (no packageset)01:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyqt5-sip [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [12.8.0-1] (no packageset)01:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyqt5-sip [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [12.8.0-1] (no packageset)01:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyqt5-sip [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [12.8.0-1] (no packageset)01:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: memcached (eoan-proposed/main) [1.5.10-0ubuntu3 => 1.5.10-0ubuntu3.1] (ubuntu-server)02:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: memcached (focal-proposed/main) [1.5.22-2 => 1.5.22-2ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-server)02:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyqt5-sip [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [12.8.0-1] (no packageset)02:22
LocutusOfBorgcan anybody please recreate and update ubuntu chroots? there is a bug fixed in debhelper, I can confirm the fix, but even with the fixed debhelper migrating in groovy release ppc64el is still sad05:58
LocutusOfBorg(please don't retry the build)05:59
LocutusOfBorgdpkg-genbuildinfo: error: cannot fstat file ../telegram-purple-dbgsym_1.4.3-3_ppc64el.ddeb: No such file or directory05:59
LocutusOfBorglooks like somewhere an old debhelper is used, not the one that is installed in the chroot05:59
LocutusOfBorgI tried a build from a newly created local ppc64el chroot and worked05:59
cjwatsonLocutusOfBorg: That doesn't seem plausible.  There's nowhere that an old debhelper could live.  The problem is something else08:16
cjwatsonLocutusOfBorg: Did your chroot have pkgbinarymangler in it?08:17
cjwatsonLocutusOfBorg: Perhaps you could try the latest cpc-buildd image, which would be what we'd update the LP chroots to if we updated them: https://launchpad.net/~cloud-images/+livefs/ubuntu/groovy/cpc-buildd/+build/22008908:19
cjwatson(You want livecd.ubuntu-base.rootfs.tar.gz from that)08:19
LocutusOfBorgcjwatson, I don't have binarymangler, it was a pbuilder chroot08:34
LocutusOfBorgis it possible for an ubuntu-archive admin to kick out gnome-chemistry-utils because of debian bug: #947529? it can't be built since focal08:35
ubot5Debian bug 947529 in src:gnome-chemistry-utils "gnome-chemistry-utils: build-depends on deprecated gnome-doc-utils" [Serious,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/94752908:35
cjwatsonLocutusOfBorg: I think it's necessary to try the candidate new chroot before stating that a new chroot will fix it; and this is the sort of thing where you need more accuracy than a pbuilder chroot will provide08:36
dokosil2100, apw, Laney, bdmurray: please ignore the rapmap autopkg test for any version, for any arch except for amd64. the package is only built there08:36
LocutusOfBorgcjwatson, actually I'm trying my new chroot with an added b-d on pkgbinarymangler :)08:38
LocutusOfBorgI know it might be not the same, but easier for me to test it08:39
cjwatsonLocutusOfBorg: Anyway chances of a new chroot fixing this kind of thing seem quite negligible08:41
cjwatsonIt's very likely some other complicated interaction that doesn't show up in your less-accurate setup, I'm afraid08:41
cjwatsonNormally all that new chroots might fix would be possibly some kind of build-dep installation failure, or of course slow build-dep installation08:42
cjwatsondebhelper isn't even installed in the chroots to start with08:42
Laneydoko: ok, pushed, fwiw a MP or even giving the text of a hint would make it a little bit easier08:51
doko"the package is only built there", but thanks08:51
dokotseliot: looking at primus-vk in -proposed, do the depends on the virtual packages need adjustments, or should the package not built at all?09:05
tseliotdoko, do you have a link I can have a look at?09:09
dokotseliot: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#primus-vk09:10
tseliotdoko, I think we can drop it, since it expects nvidia packages that quite different from ours09:16
dokotseliot: could you file a removal bug with the reasoning and assign it to ubuntu-archive?09:17
dokoginggs: fyi, ^^^09:18
dokoLocutusOfBorg, tumbleweed: I see you gave back primer3/s390x. any follow-up on that?09:19
tseliotdoko, I am going to have a closer look, and if I can't fix it easily, I'll file that bug report09:20
LocutusOfBorgdoko, no idea for primer3, looks like an old endianess issue since 2 years or so09:29
LocutusOfBorgdoko, I have an idea now09:32
LocutusOfBorgcjwatson, reproducible in pbuilder too, just we need to call dh_builddeb -a09:35
LocutusOfBorglet me find if pkgbinarymangler is responsible09:41
dokoTrevinho: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/482050195/buildlog_ubuntu-groovy-amd64.nux_4.0.8+18.10.20180623-0ubuntu2_BUILDING.txt.gz09:51
dokoyou introduced these fallthrough comments before. could you have a look, orjust disabled -Werror?09:51
LocutusOfBorgcjwatson, confirmed pkgbinarymangler is the one to blame09:58
LocutusOfBorgand only if dpkg-buildpackage is run with -B10:00
apwi don't suppose we get to blame p-itti any more10:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: backport-iwlwifi-dkms (focal-proposed/universe) [8324-0ubuntu1 => 8324-0ubuntu3~20.04.1] (no packageset)10:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: pocketsphinx-python (groovy-proposed/primary) [1:0.1.15-2]10:15
LocutusOfBorgcan anybody please accept it? it hasn't been autosyncd because pocketsphinx was still needing a merge ^^10:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pocketsphinx [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.8.0+real5prealpha+1-11ubuntu1] (no packageset)10:23
RikMillsubuntu-archive when convenient LP: #188063010:26
ubot5Launchpad bug 1880630 in nootka (Ubuntu) "Please remove nootka from Ubuntu" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/188063010:26
dokoRikMills: already done10:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (focal-proposed) [1.142.1]10:32
LocutusOfBorgcjwatson, I'm really sad...10:40
LocutusOfBorg        cp -p /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Dh_Lib.pm /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Dh_Getopt.pm perl5/Ubuntu/PkgBinaryMangler/.10:40
LocutusOfBorg        sed -i 's/Debian::Debhelper::/Ubuntu::PkgBinaryMangler::/g' perl5/Ubuntu/PkgBinaryMangler/*.pm10:40
LocutusOfBorgthis is done on pkgbinarymangle build, so we "embed" some code from debhelper, and without no-change rebuilds we still get the very same bugs over and over10:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted busybox [source] (focal-proposed) [1:1.30.1-4ubuntu6.1]10:41
cjwatsonI have no objection to somebody working out how to improve the situation10:41
LocutusOfBorgI'm thinking about using the Debhelper one, it is just a copy-paste, but I'm pretty sure who did that had good reasons, and ENOPERL here :)10:42
LocutusOfBorgin the meanwhile I'm uploading a no-change rebuild (modulo some changes lol)10:42
LocutusOfBorgoh I might know the reason for that. pkgbinarymangler uses Dh_Lib but doesn't depend on debhelper10:43
LocutusOfBorgwould add a new debhelper dependency generate some chicken and egg issue?10:44
LocutusOfBorg(oh we might have some cdbs old stuff still out there)10:45
cjwatsoncdbs depends on debhelper ...10:48
cjwatsonIt means every build would end up with debhelper installed rather than just 99% of them10:48
cjwatsonI would mildly prefer to avoid it since those builds are already weird in various ways10:48
cjwatsonAnd I can imagine that it would increase the set of possible failure modes that would require manual intervention to get out of10:49
cjwatsonProbably wouldn't be the absolute end of the world or anything but nice to avoid if possible10:49
LocutusOfBorgyou mean to depend on debhelper?10:50
cjwatsonNot sure I actually quite understand why it's needed in the first place though10:50
cjwatsonUbuntu::PkgBinaryMangler::Dh_Lib is only used by pkgbinarymangler's dh_builddeb wrapper10:50
cjwatsonAnd that wrapper is only called by builds that use dh_builddeb, which must all already build-depend on debhelper10:51
cjwatsonSo I think (just by inspection) that it could just as well use Debian::Debhelper::Dh_Lib directly and drop its copies10:52
cjwatsonThat would be better than having it depend on debhelper - it would be a simplification in more ways10:52
LocutusOfBorgcjwatson, so you are suggesting my patch to directly use debhelper without depending on it?10:53
cjwatsonYes.  I suspect that the copies were introduced when pkgbinarymangler was shaped slightly differently10:54
cjwatsonSpecifically I'm suggesting (but entirely untested) https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/xS7D2P7cS4/10:57
LocutusOfBorgcjwatson, it is *exactly* the one I'm testing :)11:05
LocutusOfBorgmodulo copyright changes :)11:06
cjwatson(I suspect that at one point this was used in something like a dpkg-deb wrapper that was used more broadly.  But I'm not sure, would need archaeology)11:07
LocutusOfBorgjust to understand, we need to update chroots now, right?11:09
xnoxdoko:  i got a weird email from launchpad about urweb saying that it is rejected in groovy-proposed because binaries conflicting with the existing ones already exist or some such.11:12
xnoxdoko:  if it was you doing something with urweb, do check what's up. Maybe some other source package took over the binaries already?11:12
xnoxdoko:  or maybe it's a demotion race, and something needs to be copied again?11:13
* xnox is not sure what was done.11:13
xnoxdo you want that email bounced to you?11:13
cjwatsonLocutusOfBorg: I don't see why11:16
cjwatsonLocutusOfBorg: pkgbinarymangler is installed as a package and we do a dist-upgrade at the start of the build11:17
dokoxnox: I demoted that to proposed11:17
dokoit was a fakesync, so importing the Debian version doesn't help11:17
LocutusOfBorgcjwatson, I found it out after asking :)11:22
xnoxdoko:  right, i'm not sure if demotion published in groovy-proposed or not.11:22
xnoxdoko:  because i got an email that it failed to publish into groovy-proposed. I guess something to double check in a couple of hours.11:22
enycLocutusOfBorg: ooi do you know if  https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/19496  got imported into the fixes of focal 20.04 virtualbox done just before release etc?11:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: subversion [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.14.0-1] (kubuntu)11:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: subversion [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.14.0-1] (kubuntu)11:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: subversion [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.14.0-1] (kubuntu)11:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mandelbulber2 [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.20-2]12:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mandelbulber2 [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [2.20-2]12:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mandelbulber2 [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [2.20-2]12:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pocketsphinx-python [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1:0.1.15-2]12:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mandelbulber2 [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2.20-2]12:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mandelbulber2 [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [2.20-2]12:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mandelbulber2 [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [2.20-2]12:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pocketsphinx [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.8.0+real5prealpha+1-11ubuntu1]12:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyqt5-sip [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [12.8.0-1]12:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyqt5-sip [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [12.8.0-1]12:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyqt5-sip [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [12.8.0-1]12:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyqt5-sip [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [12.8.0-1]12:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyqt5-sip [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [12.8.0-1]12:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyqt5-sip [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [12.8.0-1]12:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nomad-driver-lxc [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.0-1]12:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nomad-driver-lxc [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.0-1]12:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nomad-driver-lxc [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.0-1]12:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nomad-driver-lxc [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.0-1]12:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nomad-driver-lxc [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.0-1]12:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cd-boot-images [source] (groovy-proposed) [1]12:06
LocutusOfBorgenyc, nope12:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cd-boot-images [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1] (no packageset)12:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cd-boot-images [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/none) [1] (no packageset)12:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cd-boot-images [arm64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1] (no packageset)12:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cd-boot-images [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1]12:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cd-boot-images [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1]12:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cd-boot-images [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1]12:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: subversion [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.14.0-1] (kubuntu)12:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: subversion [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.14.0-1] (kubuntu)12:24
LocutusOfBorgenyc, will do eventually :)12:30
=== mfo_ is now known as mfo
=== Ukikie_ is now known as Ukikie
=== dannf is now known as dannf`
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: budgie-extras (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-2 => 1.0.2-1] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-budgie) (sync)14:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 [source] (bionic-proposed) [440.82-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]14:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 [source] (focal-proposed) [440.82.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]14:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server [source] (bionic-proposed) [418.126.02-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]14:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server [source] (bionic-proposed) [440.64.00-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]14:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server [source] (focal-proposed) [418.126.02-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]14:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server [source] (focal-proposed) [440.64.00-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]14:24
juliankLaney: are you rebasing britney? because the card is back in backlog, but I think you are?14:54
Laneyjuliank: yup14:55
Laneyshould be in progress14:55
Laneyor started or whatever14:55
Laneyabout ready to try a test run actually :-o14:56
Laneyjust got to add force-reset-test back14:56
juliankLaney: nice14:56
Laneywell then it'll probably explode in flames, but hey ho14:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted backport-iwlwifi-dkms [source] (focal-proposed) [8324-0ubuntu3~20.04.1]15:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.6-1 => 6.1.8-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1] (no packageset)15:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.6-dfsg-2ubuntu20.04.1 => 6.1.8-dfsg-2~ubuntu1.20.04.1] (no packageset)15:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.6-1 => 6.1.8-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1] (no packageset)15:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.6-dfsg-1 => 6.1.8-dfsg-2~ubuntu1.20.04.1] (ubuntu-cloud)15:17
LocutusOfBorgsil2100, if you have spare time... ^^ thanks :D15:21
LocutusOfBorg(please wait for the groovy version to migrate first)15:21
=== ErichEickmeyer is now known as Eickmeyer
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted subversion [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.14.0-1]15:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted subversion [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.14.0-1]15:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted subversion [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.14.0-1]15:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted subversion [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.14.0-1]15:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted subversion [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.14.0-1]15:32
LocutusOfBorgHello, does anybody know why merge-o-matic page is not listing e.g. qemu16:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: subversion [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.14.0-1] (kubuntu)16:15
xnoxsync-blacklist.txt:# stevenk, we don't want qemu from Debian, talk to kirkland16:44
xnoxLocutusOfBorg:  it's in sync-blacklist in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveAdministration#Blacklisting / lp:~ubuntu-archive/+junk/sync-blacklist16:44
xnoxLocutusOfBorg:  do not touch =)16:44
LocutusOfBorgxnox, I don't want to touch, I was just curious :)16:54
Laneyhmm this commit is a bit complex, it interacts with the new neutral handling in interesting ways17:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (xenial-proposed/main) [2:8.4.0-0ubuntu7.4 => 2:8.4.0-0ubuntu7.5] (openstack, ubuntu-server)18:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (xenial-proposed/main) [19.4-33-gbb4131a2-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 20.2-45-g5f7825e2-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)19:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (focal-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~20.04.1 => 0.99-0ubuntu3~20.04.2] (core)19:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected netplan.io [source] (focal-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu3~20.04.2]19:38
blackboxswsil2100: if around today and available cloudinit has queued an sru for X B E and F releases per https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/188101819:43
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1881018 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Focal) "sru cloud-init (19.4.33 to 20.2-45) Xenial, Bionic, Eoan and Focal" [Undecided,New]19:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (eoan-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~19.10.1 => 0.99-0ubuntu3~19.10.2] (core)19:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected netplan.io [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu3~19.10.2]19:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu3~18.04.3]19:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu3~19.10.2]19:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (focal-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu3~20.04.2]19:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.1 => 3.36.3-1ubuntu1~20.04.1] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)20:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-1.14 (focal-proposed/main) [1.14.2-1ubuntu1 => 1.14.3-2ubuntu2~20.04.1] (no packageset)22:34
=== WillMoogle_ is now known as WillMoogle

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!