[00:00] <mwhudson> hah, that upload probably wouldn'
[00:01] <mwhudson> t have built anyway
[00:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: live-build (focal-proposed/main) [3.0~a57-1ubuntu38.20.04.1 => 3.0~a57-1ubuntu38.20.04.2] (desktop-core)
[00:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (focal-proposed/main) [2.20.11-0ubuntu27.2 => 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.3] (core, i386-whitelist)
[00:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected apport [source] (focal-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu27.3]
[01:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyqt5-sip [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [12.8.0-1] (no packageset)
[01:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyqt5-sip [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [12.8.0-1] (no packageset)
[01:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyqt5-sip [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [12.8.0-1] (no packageset)
[01:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyqt5-sip [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [12.8.0-1] (no packageset)
[02:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: memcached (eoan-proposed/main) [1.5.10-0ubuntu3 => 1.5.10-0ubuntu3.1] (ubuntu-server)
[02:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: memcached (focal-proposed/main) [1.5.22-2 => 1.5.22-2ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-server)
[02:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyqt5-sip [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [12.8.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:58] <LocutusOfBorg> can anybody please recreate and update ubuntu chroots? there is a bug fixed in debhelper, I can confirm the fix, but even with the fixed debhelper migrating in groovy release ppc64el is still sad
[05:59] <LocutusOfBorg> (please don't retry the build)
[05:59] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/482665193/buildlog_ubuntu-groovy-ppc64el.telegram-purple_1.4.3-3_BUILDING.txt.gz
[05:59] <LocutusOfBorg> dpkg-genbuildinfo: error: cannot fstat file ../telegram-purple-dbgsym_1.4.3-3_ppc64el.ddeb: No such file or directory
[05:59] <LocutusOfBorg> looks like somewhere an old debhelper is used, not the one that is installed in the chroot
[05:59] <LocutusOfBorg> I tried a build from a newly created local ppc64el chroot and worked
[08:16] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: That doesn't seem plausible.  There's nowhere that an old debhelper could live.  The problem is something else
[08:17] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: Did your chroot have pkgbinarymangler in it?
[08:19] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: Perhaps you could try the latest cpc-buildd image, which would be what we'd update the LP chroots to if we updated them: https://launchpad.net/~cloud-images/+livefs/ubuntu/groovy/cpc-buildd/+build/220089
[08:19] <cjwatson> (You want livecd.ubuntu-base.rootfs.tar.gz from that)
[08:34] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, I don't have binarymangler, it was a pbuilder chroot
[08:35] <LocutusOfBorg> is it possible for an ubuntu-archive admin to kick out gnome-chemistry-utils because of debian bug: #947529? it can't be built since focal
[08:36] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: I think it's necessary to try the candidate new chroot before stating that a new chroot will fix it; and this is the sort of thing where you need more accuracy than a pbuilder chroot will provide
[08:36] <doko> sil2100, apw, Laney, bdmurray: please ignore the rapmap autopkg test for any version, for any arch except for amd64. the package is only built there
[08:38] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, actually I'm trying my new chroot with an added b-d on pkgbinarymangler :)
[08:39] <LocutusOfBorg> I know it might be not the same, but easier for me to test it
[08:41] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: Anyway chances of a new chroot fixing this kind of thing seem quite negligible
[08:41] <cjwatson> It's very likely some other complicated interaction that doesn't show up in your less-accurate setup, I'm afraid
[08:42] <cjwatson> Normally all that new chroots might fix would be possibly some kind of build-dep installation failure, or of course slow build-dep installation
[08:42] <cjwatson> debhelper isn't even installed in the chroots to start with
[08:51] <Laney> doko: ok, pushed, fwiw a MP or even giving the text of a hint would make it a little bit easier
[08:51] <doko> "the package is only built there", but thanks
[08:52] <Laney> hm?
[09:05] <doko> tseliot: looking at primus-vk in -proposed, do the depends on the virtual packages need adjustments, or should the package not built at all?
[09:09] <tseliot> doko, do you have a link I can have a look at?
[09:10] <doko> tseliot: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#primus-vk
[09:16] <tseliot> doko, I think we can drop it, since it expects nvidia packages that quite different from ours
[09:17] <doko> tseliot: could you file a removal bug with the reasoning and assign it to ubuntu-archive?
[09:18] <doko> ginggs: fyi, ^^^
[09:19] <doko> LocutusOfBorg, tumbleweed: I see you gave back primer3/s390x. any follow-up on that?
[09:20] <tseliot> doko, I am going to have a closer look, and if I can't fix it easily, I'll file that bug report
[09:21] <doko> ta
[09:29] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, no idea for primer3, looks like an old endianess issue since 2 years or so
[09:32] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, I have an idea now
[09:35] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, reproducible in pbuilder too, just we need to call dh_builddeb -a
[09:41] <LocutusOfBorg> let me find if pkgbinarymangler is responsible
[09:51] <doko> Trevinho: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/482050195/buildlog_ubuntu-groovy-amd64.nux_4.0.8+18.10.20180623-0ubuntu2_BUILDING.txt.gz
[09:51] <doko> you introduced these fallthrough comments before. could you have a look, orjust disabled -Werror?
[09:58] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, confirmed pkgbinarymangler is the one to blame
[09:58] <cjwatson> Right
[10:00] <LocutusOfBorg> and only if dpkg-buildpackage is run with -B
[10:06] <apw> i don't suppose we get to blame p-itti any more
[10:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: backport-iwlwifi-dkms (focal-proposed/universe) [8324-0ubuntu1 => 8324-0ubuntu3~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[10:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: pocketsphinx-python (groovy-proposed/primary) [1:0.1.15-2]
[10:15] <LocutusOfBorg> can anybody please accept it? it hasn't been autosyncd because pocketsphinx was still needing a merge ^^
[10:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pocketsphinx [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.8.0+real5prealpha+1-11ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:26] <RikMills> ubuntu-archive when convenient LP: #1880630
[10:30] <doko> RikMills: already done
[10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (focal-proposed) [1.142.1]
[10:38] <RikMills> :)
[10:40] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, I'm really sad...
[10:40] <LocutusOfBorg>         cp -p /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Dh_Lib.pm /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Dh_Getopt.pm perl5/Ubuntu/PkgBinaryMangler/.
[10:40] <LocutusOfBorg>         sed -i 's/Debian::Debhelper::/Ubuntu::PkgBinaryMangler::/g' perl5/Ubuntu/PkgBinaryMangler/*.pm
[10:40] <LocutusOfBorg> this is done on pkgbinarymangle build, so we "embed" some code from debhelper, and without no-change rebuilds we still get the very same bugs over and over
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted busybox [source] (focal-proposed) [1:1.30.1-4ubuntu6.1]
[10:41] <cjwatson> I have no objection to somebody working out how to improve the situation
[10:42] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm thinking about using the Debhelper one, it is just a copy-paste, but I'm pretty sure who did that had good reasons, and ENOPERL here :)
[10:42] <LocutusOfBorg> in the meanwhile I'm uploading a no-change rebuild (modulo some changes lol)
[10:43] <LocutusOfBorg> oh I might know the reason for that. pkgbinarymangler uses Dh_Lib but doesn't depend on debhelper
[10:44] <LocutusOfBorg> would add a new debhelper dependency generate some chicken and egg issue?
[10:45] <LocutusOfBorg> (oh we might have some cdbs old stuff still out there)
[10:48] <cjwatson> cdbs depends on debhelper ...
[10:48] <cjwatson> It means every build would end up with debhelper installed rather than just 99% of them
[10:48] <cjwatson> I would mildly prefer to avoid it since those builds are already weird in various ways
[10:49] <cjwatson> And I can imagine that it would increase the set of possible failure modes that would require manual intervention to get out of
[10:49] <cjwatson> Probably wouldn't be the absolute end of the world or anything but nice to avoid if possible
[10:50] <LocutusOfBorg> you mean to depend on debhelper?
[10:50] <cjwatson> Yes
[10:50] <cjwatson> Not sure I actually quite understand why it's needed in the first place though
[10:50] <cjwatson> Ubuntu::PkgBinaryMangler::Dh_Lib is only used by pkgbinarymangler's dh_builddeb wrapper
[10:51] <cjwatson> And that wrapper is only called by builds that use dh_builddeb, which must all already build-depend on debhelper
[10:52] <cjwatson> So I think (just by inspection) that it could just as well use Debian::Debhelper::Dh_Lib directly and drop its copies
[10:52] <cjwatson> That would be better than having it depend on debhelper - it would be a simplification in more ways
[10:53] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, so you are suggesting my patch to directly use debhelper without depending on it?
[10:54] <cjwatson> Yes.  I suspect that the copies were introduced when pkgbinarymangler was shaped slightly differently
[10:57] <cjwatson> Specifically I'm suggesting (but entirely untested) https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/xS7D2P7cS4/
[11:05] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, it is *exactly* the one I'm testing :)
[11:06] <LocutusOfBorg> modulo copyright changes :)
[11:06] <cjwatson> Heh
[11:07] <cjwatson> (I suspect that at one point this was used in something like a dpkg-deb wrapper that was used more broadly.  But I'm not sure, would need archaeology)
[11:09] <LocutusOfBorg> just to understand, we need to update chroots now, right?
[11:12] <xnox> doko:  i got a weird email from launchpad about urweb saying that it is rejected in groovy-proposed because binaries conflicting with the existing ones already exist or some such.
[11:12] <xnox> doko:  if it was you doing something with urweb, do check what's up. Maybe some other source package took over the binaries already?
[11:13] <xnox> doko:  or maybe it's a demotion race, and something needs to be copied again?
[11:13]  * xnox is not sure what was done.
[11:13] <xnox> do you want that email bounced to you?
[11:16] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: I don't see why
[11:17] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: pkgbinarymangler is installed as a package and we do a dist-upgrade at the start of the build
[11:17] <doko> xnox: I demoted that to proposed
[11:17] <doko> it was a fakesync, so importing the Debian version doesn't help
[11:22] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, I found it out after asking :)
[11:22] <xnox> doko:  right, i'm not sure if demotion published in groovy-proposed or not.
[11:22] <xnox> doko:  because i got an email that it failed to publish into groovy-proposed. I guess something to double check in a couple of hours.
[11:32] <enyc> LocutusOfBorg: ooi do you know if  https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/19496  got imported into the fixes of focal 20.04 virtualbox done just before release etc?
[11:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: subversion [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.14.0-1] (kubuntu)
[11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: subversion [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.14.0-1] (kubuntu)
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: subversion [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.14.0-1] (kubuntu)
[12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mandelbulber2 [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.20-2]
[12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mandelbulber2 [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [2.20-2]
[12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mandelbulber2 [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [2.20-2]
[12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pocketsphinx-python [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1:0.1.15-2]
[12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mandelbulber2 [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2.20-2]
[12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mandelbulber2 [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [2.20-2]
[12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mandelbulber2 [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [2.20-2]
[12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pocketsphinx [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.8.0+real5prealpha+1-11ubuntu1]
[12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyqt5-sip [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [12.8.0-1]
[12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyqt5-sip [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [12.8.0-1]
[12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyqt5-sip [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [12.8.0-1]
[12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyqt5-sip [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [12.8.0-1]
[12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyqt5-sip [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [12.8.0-1]
[12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyqt5-sip [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [12.8.0-1]
[12:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nomad-driver-lxc [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[12:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nomad-driver-lxc [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[12:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nomad-driver-lxc [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[12:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nomad-driver-lxc [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[12:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nomad-driver-lxc [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cd-boot-images [source] (groovy-proposed) [1]
[12:08] <LocutusOfBorg> enyc, nope
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cd-boot-images [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1] (no packageset)
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cd-boot-images [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/none) [1] (no packageset)
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cd-boot-images [arm64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1] (no packageset)
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cd-boot-images [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1]
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cd-boot-images [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1]
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cd-boot-images [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1]
[12:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: subversion [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.14.0-1] (kubuntu)
[12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: subversion [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.14.0-1] (kubuntu)
[12:30] <LocutusOfBorg> enyc, will do eventually :)
[14:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: budgie-extras (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-2 => 1.0.2-1] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-budgie) (sync)
[14:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 [source] (bionic-proposed) [440.82-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 [source] (focal-proposed) [440.82.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server [source] (bionic-proposed) [418.126.02-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server [source] (bionic-proposed) [440.64.00-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server [source] (focal-proposed) [418.126.02-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server [source] (focal-proposed) [440.64.00-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[14:54] <juliank> Laney: are you rebasing britney? because the card is back in backlog, but I think you are?
[14:54] <juliank> https://trello.com/c/Fvi9ir6D/23-rebase-britney
[14:55] <Laney> juliank: yup
[14:55] <Laney> should be in progress
[14:55] <Laney> or started or whatever
[14:56] <Laney> about ready to try a test run actually :-o
[14:56] <Laney> just got to add force-reset-test back
[14:56] <juliank> Laney: nice
[14:58] <Laney> well then it'll probably explode in flames, but hey ho
[15:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted backport-iwlwifi-dkms [source] (focal-proposed) [8324-0ubuntu3~20.04.1]
[15:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.6-1 => 6.1.8-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1] (no packageset)
[15:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.6-dfsg-2ubuntu20.04.1 => 6.1.8-dfsg-2~ubuntu1.20.04.1] (no packageset)
[15:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.6-1 => 6.1.8-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1] (no packageset)
[15:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.6-dfsg-1 => 6.1.8-dfsg-2~ubuntu1.20.04.1] (ubuntu-cloud)
[15:21] <LocutusOfBorg> sil2100, if you have spare time... ^^ thanks :D
[15:21] <LocutusOfBorg> (please wait for the groovy version to migrate first)
[15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted subversion [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.14.0-1]
[15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted subversion [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.14.0-1]
[15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted subversion [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.14.0-1]
[15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted subversion [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.14.0-1]
[15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted subversion [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.14.0-1]
[16:09] <LocutusOfBorg> Hello, does anybody know why merge-o-matic page is not listing e.g. qemu
[16:09] <LocutusOfBorg> ?
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: subversion [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.14.0-1] (kubuntu)
[16:44] <xnox> sync-blacklist.txt:# stevenk, we don't want qemu from Debian, talk to kirkland
[16:44] <xnox> sync-blacklist.txt:qemu
[16:44] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  it's in sync-blacklist in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveAdministration#Blacklisting / lp:~ubuntu-archive/+junk/sync-blacklist
[16:44] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  do not touch =)
[16:54] <LocutusOfBorg> xnox, I don't want to touch, I was just curious :)
[17:01] <Laney> hmm this commit is a bit complex, it interacts with the new neutral handling in interesting ways
[18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (xenial-proposed/main) [2:8.4.0-0ubuntu7.4 => 2:8.4.0-0ubuntu7.5] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[19:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (xenial-proposed/main) [19.4-33-gbb4131a2-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 20.2-45-g5f7825e2-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[19:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (focal-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~20.04.1 => 0.99-0ubuntu3~20.04.2] (core)
[19:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected netplan.io [source] (focal-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu3~20.04.2]
[19:43] <blackboxsw> sil2100: if around today and available cloudinit has queued an sru for X B E and F releases per https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1881018
[19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (eoan-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~19.10.1 => 0.99-0ubuntu3~19.10.2] (core)
[19:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected netplan.io [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu3~19.10.2]
[19:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu3~18.04.3]
[19:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu3~19.10.2]
[19:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (focal-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu3~20.04.2]
[20:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.1 => 3.36.3-1ubuntu1~20.04.1] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[22:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-1.14 (focal-proposed/main) [1.14.2-1ubuntu1 => 1.14.3-2ubuntu2~20.04.1] (no packageset)