| kc2bez | Eickmeyer: It was likely installed on the system already but one of the remixes was having issues with LUKS without it. I didn't totally reinvent the wheel either, I followed debian a bit https://salsa.debian.org/live-team/calamares-settings-debian-packaging/-/blob/master/debian/control | 00:08 |
|---|---|---|
| Eickmeyer | Interesting. | 00:08 |
| kc2bez | If it really is an issue I can look at removing. | 00:09 |
| Eickmeyer | I'm going to roll with it for now and see what happens. I just fixed a bug I had previously fixed (love it when that happens) in the Studio configs, so we'll see what happens. | 00:09 |
| kc2bez | I didn't touch those (or at least I didn't intentionally). | 00:10 |
| kc2bez | Apologies for the trouble. | 00:11 |
| Eickmeyer | You didn't, the fix I had previously (blacklisting the file) didn't work. | 00:12 |
| Eickmeyer | So now I'm checking for if it exists. | 00:13 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> 0.15 landed | 00:55 |
| lubot | <kc2bez> @tsimonq2 [0.15 landed], Fantastic work Simon | 01:06 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> Thanks :) you too! | 01:06 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> amazing! good/hard work! | 01:25 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> It's a team effort :) | 01:25 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> In the meantime, I have some prototype code at home which refactors the nightly | 01:26 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> Makes it about 6-10x faster and allows for different config files | 01:27 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> This puts me really close to starting Qt 6 nightlies | 01:28 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> And then we can build LXQt against it | 01:28 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> Then once there's an actual release of Qt 6, we can work with Debian Qt/KDE to get it in Debian | 01:29 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_qterminal just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_qterminal/523/ | 01:38 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_qterminal just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_qterminal/523/ | 01:38 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_qterminal just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_qterminal/64/ | 01:38 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_qterminal just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_qterminal/64/ | 01:38 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_qterminal just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_qterminal/64/ | 01:39 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_qterminal just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_qterminal/523/ | 01:39 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_qterminal just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_qterminal/64/ | 01:39 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_qterminal just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_qterminal/523/ | 01:39 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_pcmanfm-qt just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_pcmanfm-qt/307/ | 01:39 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_pcmanfm-qt just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_pcmanfm-qt/62/ | 01:39 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_pcmanfm-qt just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_pcmanfm-qt/307/ | 01:39 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_pcmanfm-qt just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_pcmanfm-qt/62/ | 01:39 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_qterminal FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_qterminal/524/ | 01:44 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_qterminal FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_qterminal/65/ | 01:44 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_qterminal FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_qterminal/65/ | 01:44 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_qterminal FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_qterminal/524/ | 01:44 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/293/ | 01:48 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-powermanagement just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/44/ | 01:48 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/293/ | 01:48 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-powermanagement just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/44/ | 01:48 | |
| Eickmeyer[m] | Hmmmm... Anybody notice that if you're using luks encryption that it asks for the password before Plymouth loads? | 01:51 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/294/ | 01:53 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-powermanagement FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/45/ | 01:53 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lximage-qt just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lximage-qt/295/ | 01:56 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lximage-qt just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lximage-qt/295/ | 01:56 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lximage-qt just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lximage-qt/62/ | 01:56 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lximage-qt just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lximage-qt/62/ | 01:56 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-notificationd just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-notificationd/287/ | 01:58 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-notificationd just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-notificationd/287/ | 01:58 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-sudo FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-sudo/296/ | 01:58 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_qterminal FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_qterminal/66/ | 01:59 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_qterminal FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_qterminal/66/ | 01:59 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_qterminal FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_qterminal/525/ | 01:59 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_qterminal FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_qterminal/525/ | 01:59 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-sudo just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-sudo/297/ | 02:03 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/295/ | 02:08 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-powermanagement FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/46/ | 02:08 | |
| guiverc | Eickmeyer[m], I assumed that (encryption key first) was to give less detail away (ie. plymouth/lubuntu info not yet seen) but I know nothing about it | 02:20 |
| Eickmeyer | guiverc: Yeah, the issue is that it doesn't give a prompt box and visual feedback (****) without Plymouth. I've actually had emails that people expect that. | 02:21 |
| guiverc | I can imagine end-users would like it... I've opted (i guess) to see it as a security-feature :) | 02:22 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | Well, it's not really. Plymouth is part of initramd which is required to load prior to mounting anything. | 02:22 |
| guiverc | I didn't say it was a good security feature... it's less easily giving out details :) | 02:23 |
| lubot | <aptghetto> @Eickmeyer[m] [<Eickmeyer[m]> Hmmmm... Anybody notice that if you're using luks encryption that …], Yes, that is normal and expected. … Calamares encrypts /boot and the LUKS container is unlocked twice. … With Grub, where you have to enter the passphrase and later with a keyfile. … Currently, Calamares does not support FDE with an u | 04:56 |
| lubot | nencrypted /boot partition. | 04:56 |
| Eickmeyer | @aptghetto That's not good. I've been sent emails about that, people want that graphical prompt in Plymouth. | 04:59 |
| Eickmeyer | Anaconda (Fedora), YaST (OpenSUSE), and Ubiquity support it. This needs to be fixed. | 05:00 |
| Eickmeyer | I mean, it's not a complete deal breaker, but it's less than ideal. | 05:00 |
| lubot | <aptghetto> There is an upstream bug, but no one is working on it. | 05:01 |
| Eickmeyer | I just commented on it. https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1311#issuecomment-639260847 | 05:05 |
| ubot93 | Issue 1311 in calamares/calamares "Add an option to not encrypt /boot" [Open] | 05:05 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] jobgenerator just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/jobgenerator/620/ | 05:19 | |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> ^ expected | 05:23 |
| lotuspsychje | good afternoon to all | 12:17 |
| lotuspsychje | i have a little question about language-selector-gnome, seems like lubuntu has dropped this due gtk? | 12:18 |
| lotuspsychje | so is the user supposed to install his own language pack himself now | 12:19 |
| lotuspsychje | i fixxed things manually on a fresh installed lubuntu 20.04 with check-language-support -l nl and installing the packs | 12:21 |
| === hggdh is now known as hggdh-msft | ||
| wxl | Eickmeyer: even though it's not super user friendly it *IS* the more secure option. to not have /boot encrypted is to have non-full disk encryption. | 16:44 |
| Eickmeyer | wxl: I know, but I'm looking out for my users. Either way, looks like they're going to take action and allow it. | 16:45 |
| wxl | Eickmeyer: that's not what i read | 16:47 |
| wxl | Eickmeyer: also i think looking out for users would mean looking out for their security first | 16:47 |
| Eickmeyer | wxl: Then why does every other installer allow it? | 16:48 |
| Eickmeyer | Ubiquity, Anaconda, YaST.... every one except Calamares. | 16:48 |
| wxl | Eickmeyer: because they don't consider security a priority | 16:48 |
| Eickmeyer | I disagree. I think an unencrypted /boot is completely fine. You're not going to have any sensitive files in there. | 16:49 |
| wxl | the keys are there, of course | 16:50 |
| Eickmeyer | Uh, no. The keys should be stored in RAM when the user enters it. | 16:50 |
| Eickmeyer | I've seriously had complaints about this. | 16:51 |
| wxl | not the password | 16:51 |
| wxl | start here https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1311#issuecomment-579741764 | 16:51 |
| ubot93 | Issue 1311 in calamares/calamares "Add an option to not encrypt /boot" [Open] | 16:51 |
| Eickmeyer | wxl: Read down, I've already commented. | 16:51 |
| wxl | i see that, though it doesn't necessarily directly resolve those particular concerns | 16:52 |
| Eickmeyer | Ok, then how can we implement a prompt? Grub won't do it, only Plymouth will. | 16:52 |
| wxl | even kkofler's comment after it refers to the issue i bring up | 16:52 |
| wxl | it's literally a question of choosing to actually do full disk encryption or choosing user friendliness and not encrypting /boot, which is a security risk | 16:53 |
| Eickmeyer | I have some very low opinions about kkofler. He's constantly being negative in #fedora-kde and is bitter at Redhat for removing KDE from RHEL. He's a very negative person, and I take everything he says with a grain of salt. | 16:53 |
| wxl | i understand your personal feelings about him and can relate, but he's not necessarily wrong in his assertions on this issue because of his lackings in social abilities :) | 16:54 |
| Eickmeyer | Also, that's if the EFI partition is /boot. EFI partition should always be /boot/efi. /boot should be a separate partition from EFI. | 16:54 |
| Eickmeyer | He didn't address a separate partition option. | 16:55 |
| Eickmeyer | Seems as though Chrysostomus seems to agree with me. | 16:55 |
| wxl | there's lots of people that agree with the idea | 16:56 |
| wxl | *i* agree with the idea | 16:56 |
| wxl | but implementing it without compromising security is the problem | 16:56 |
| Eickmeyer | This is a situation where I want user friendliness. My target user base isn't going to know what to do when they recieve no prompt for the encryption password. | 16:57 |
| wxl | in general, compromising a little security isn't a terrible problem but when you're making someone think they're securing their disk but they're really not getting that, it's a problem | 16:57 |
| Eickmeyer | And they'll be further confused when they enter it and don't recieve (***) when they type. | 16:57 |
| wxl | that's, honestly, the least of the issues | 16:58 |
| wxl | the biggest issue is for non-us keyboard users | 16:58 |
| Eickmeyer | Probably, but I guarantee I'll get complaints in October if this happens. People going to Ubuntu Studio are looking for user friendlines. | 16:59 |
| wxl | https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1203 | 16:59 |
| ubot93 | Issue 1203 in calamares/calamares "Encryption does not work well with non-QWERTY keyboards" [Open] | 16:59 |
| Eickmeyer | And that's a problem that Plymouth solves. | 16:59 |
| wxl | it's really nothing a manual can't resolve | 16:59 |
| wxl | assuming you don't encrypt /boot, it all works fine | 17:00 |
| wxl | but that also makes "full disk encryption" a lie | 17:01 |
| wxl | it honestly requires a caveat | 17:01 |
| Eickmeyer | Well, technically then, one cannot do "full disk encryption" with UEFI then because the /boot/efi partition must be unencrypted to load the .efi file. | 17:01 |
| wxl | i'm the type of person that likes full disk encryption and when i learned all this, it made me rather uncomfortable to know that i actually never had it | 17:02 |
| Eickmeyer | I'm OK with partial disk encryption. So long as the sensitive files are encrypted, it's good. | 17:02 |
| wxl | *all* of your users are not going to want to encrypt their disk | 17:02 |
| Eickmeyer | Right, but I want to avoid the angry "You broke it" emails. | 17:02 |
| wxl | and the ones that do may not actually want what you're advocating for | 17:03 |
| Eickmeyer | I've already had emails unhappy about the plymouth theme we included in 20.04 since it doesn't properly give a box for the masked password. | 17:04 |
| Eickmeyer | I can't imagine what's going to happen when there's not even a prompt. | 17:04 |
| wxl | you can make some of the people happy some of the time but you can't make all of the people happy all of the time | 17:04 |
| Eickmeyer | I know, I know, but I've been all about improving UX ever since I joined Ubuntu Studio. | 17:05 |
| Eickmeyer | From that perspective, this is a regression. | 17:05 |
| wxl | and from mine, it's an improvement | 17:06 |
| wxl | and again, i'm prone to encrypt my disk | 17:06 |
| Eickmeyer | Either way, I might chalk it up to "those wanting to encrypt their disk won't care about the UX as much". | 17:06 |
| wxl | you may want to ask for second opinions from your users that actually have interest in encryption | 17:06 |
| wxl | i don't think that would be an unreasonable assumption | 17:07 |
| wxl | they care (i care) but if security is a priority, there you go | 17:07 |
| Eickmeyer | Right, but I think I'd still like the option. We'll see what happens with my comment, it seems to have restarted the conversation. | 17:08 |
| wxl | i think it would be nice if they offered the option to not encrypt /boot. it seems relatively simple. i still wouldn't use it, personally, | 17:11 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [rCI5f198dc77053: Massive cleanup of jobgenerator to allow for more flexible metadata.] tsimonq2 (Simon Quigley) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rCI5f198dc77053 | 17:33 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] jobgenerator just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/jobgenerator/621/ | 17:35 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] merger_lxqt-admin just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_lxqt-admin/501/ | 17:36 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] merger_lxqt-policykit just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_lxqt-policykit/504/ | 17:36 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] merger_lximage-qt just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_lximage-qt/506/ | 17:36 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] merger_obconf-qt just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_obconf-qt/504/ | 17:36 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] merger_liblxqt just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_liblxqt/510/ | 17:36 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] merger_qtermwidget just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_qtermwidget/506/ | 17:36 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] merger_lxqt-session just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_lxqt-session/505/ | 17:36 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] merger_lxqt-globalkeys just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_lxqt-globalkeys/510/ | 17:36 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] merger_lxqt-archiver just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_lxqt-archiver/509/ | 17:36 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] merger_lxqt-openssh-askpass just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_lxqt-openssh-askpass/505/ | 17:36 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] merger_compton-conf just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_compton-conf/502/ | 17:36 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] merger_lxqt-build-tools just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_lxqt-build-tools/502/ | 17:36 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] merger_lxqt-qtplugin just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_lxqt-qtplugin/515/ | 17:36 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] merger_lxqt-powermanagement just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_lxqt-powermanagement/509/ | 17:36 | |
| tsimonq2 | Launching a nightly after deploying that. | 17:36 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] merger_pcmanfm-qt just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_pcmanfm-qt/503/ | 17:36 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] merger_screengrab just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_screengrab/507/ | 17:36 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] merger_lxqt-themes just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_lxqt-themes/501/ | 17:36 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] merger_lxqt-panel just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_lxqt-panel/505/ | 17:36 | |
| tsimonq2 | Oh... | 17:36 |
| tsimonq2 | Well... | 17:36 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_calamares just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_calamares/48/ | 17:36 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_nm-tray just failed after being unstable: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_nm-tray/289/ | 17:36 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_nm-tray just failed after being unstable: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_nm-tray/43/ | 17:36 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_nm-tray just failed after being unstable: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_nm-tray/289/ | 17:36 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_calamares just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_calamares/367/ | 17:36 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_calamares just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_calamares/48/ | 17:36 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_calamares just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_calamares/367/ | 17:36 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_nm-tray just failed after being unstable: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_nm-tray/43/ | 17:36 | |
| tsimonq2 | mmm, that makes sense... | 17:37 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_nm-tray FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_nm-tray/44/ | 17:42 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_calamares FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_calamares/49/ | 17:42 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_nm-tray FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_nm-tray/290/ | 17:42 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_calamares FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_calamares/368/ | 17:42 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_nm-tray FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_nm-tray/290/ | 17:42 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_calamares FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_calamares/368/ | 17:42 | |
| lubot | <kc2bez> It does? | 17:43 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_calamares ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_calamares/369/ | 17:44 | |
| tsimonq2 | Working on it. | 17:44 |
| lubot | <kc2bez> I trust you. | 17:45 |
| tsimonq2 | OHHHHHHHHHHHH | 17:53 |
| tsimonq2 | One line messup breaks the entire thing. | 17:53 |
| tsimonq2 | Nice. | 17:53 |
| tsimonq2 | There we go, I'll push this changeset then. | 17:54 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [rCId052943e6dce: Yo dawg, I heard you like dict values, so I made your dict value a dict value.] tsimonq2 (Simon Quigley) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rCId052943e6dce | 17:56 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [rCIfc9e24b62bf8: Update templates for updated Jinja substitution variables.] tsimonq2 (Simon Quigley) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rCIfc9e24b62bf8 | 17:56 | |
| tsimonq2 | ;) | 17:57 |
| lubot | <kc2bez> Thanks dawg ;) | 17:57 |
| tsimonq2 | XD | 17:57 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [rCIa145c02ddeba: Define new jobs by their config name, not by their job type.] tsimonq2 (Simon Quigley) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rCIa145c02ddeba | 18:20 | |
| tsimonq2 | That should be fixed now. | 18:36 |
| tsimonq2 | Once I fix this timer logic, I'll kick off a nightly. | 18:36 |
| tsimonq2 | I'm almost there, fwiw. | 18:36 |
| tsimonq2 | It's off by a little more than a second but that's about the closest I can get for now. | 18:45 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [rCIc394b5221bc1: Fix the timer.] tsimonq2 (Simon Quigley) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rCIc394b5221bc1 | 18:47 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-build-tools ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-build-tools/261/ | 18:48 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-build-tools ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-build-tools/261/ | 18:48 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-policykit ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-policykit/46/ | 18:48 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver/68/ | 18:48 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_libsysstat ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_libsysstat/292/ | 18:48 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_libsysstat ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_libsysstat/292/ | 18:48 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-policykit ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-policykit/288/ | 18:48 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_nm-tray ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_nm-tray/45/ | 18:48 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_compton-conf ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_compton-conf/45/ | 18:48 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-openssh-askpass ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-openssh-askpass/295/ | 18:48 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-runner ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-runner/45/ | 18:48 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_nm-tray ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_nm-tray/291/ | 18:48 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_libsysstat ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_libsysstat/46/ | 18:48 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-archiver ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-archiver/75/ | 18:49 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_nm-tray ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_nm-tray/291/ | 18:49 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_nm-tray ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_nm-tray/45/ | 18:49 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_libsysstat ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_libsysstat/46/ | 18:49 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_compton-conf ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_compton-conf/45/ | 18:49 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-policykit ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-policykit/288/ | 18:49 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_compton-conf ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_compton-conf/297/ | 18:49 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-openssh-askpass ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-openssh-askpass/46/ | 18:49 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_compton-conf ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_compton-conf/297/ | 18:49 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-policykit ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-policykit/46/ | 18:49 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-archiver ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-archiver/75/ | 18:49 | |
| tsimonq2 | That's me. | 18:49 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver/68/ | 18:49 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-runner ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-runner/298/ | 18:49 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-runner ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-runner/298/ | 18:49 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] merger_sddm FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_sddm/48/ | 18:50 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] merger_sddm FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_sddm/48/ | 18:51 | |
| tsimonq2 | Ooo, fun one. | 18:51 |
| tsimonq2 | Here... | 18:51 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [rCI44d9368d3fff: Don't override cascade if it already exists.] tsimonq2 (Simon Quigley) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rCI44d9368d3fff | 18:53 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [rCIMETADATA4bb53fa7cfea: Manually override cascade for SDDM.] tsimonq2 (Simon Quigley) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rCIMETADATA4bb53fa7cfea | 18:54 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [rCIMETADATA51dc85a9742d: Add ubuntu/focal to the default merger cascade.] tsimonq2 (Simon Quigley) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rCIMETADATA51dc85a9742d | 18:54 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] jobgenerator just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/jobgenerator/624/ | 18:54 | |
| Eickmeyer | tsimonq2 forgot a simicolon or did a 20 GOTO 20. | 18:55 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [rCI5b70b9b93df0: Add cascade to the optional fields so if we manually override it there isn't a…] tsimonq2 (Simon Quigley) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rCI5b70b9b93df0 | 18:56 | |
| tsimonq2 | hahahahahaha | 18:56 |
| tsimonq2 | No, actually I forgot to update the field list. | 18:56 |
| Eickmeyer | Ohhhhh... XD | 18:56 |
| tsimonq2 | Now it should be fine. | 18:56 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] jobgenerator just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/jobgenerator/625/ | 18:57 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] merger_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_libfm-qt/538/ | 18:57 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] merger_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_libfm-qt/539/ | 18:58 | |
| tsimonq2 | ^ that is a valid failure. | 18:58 |
| tsimonq2 | Unfortunately my time today is limited. | 18:58 |
| tsimonq2 | However, before I go I'll paste a CI report in here. | 18:58 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-powermanagement FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/46/ | 19:08 | |
| tsimonq2 | not this again | 19:08 |
| tsimonq2 | ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh | 19:08 |
| tsimonq2 | makes sense | 19:09 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/295/ | 19:14 | |
| tsimonq2 | Total jobs failing: 16 | 19:15 |
| tsimonq2 | Total packages failing: 5 | 19:15 |
| tsimonq2 | Packages which are failing: calamares sddm libfm-qt lxqt-powermanagement qterminal | 19:15 |
| tsimonq2 | SDDM is just failing because of Lintian problems. | 19:15 |
| tsimonq2 | (Well, it's Unstable.) | 19:15 |
| tsimonq2 | All of the rest are actual failures. | 19:16 |
| tsimonq2 | https://ci.lubuntu.me/ <-- take a look and fix packages if you have time. | 19:16 |
| lubot | <kc2bez> Why did cala start failing? | 19:16 |
| tsimonq2 | I think it's a transient failure. | 19:17 |
| tsimonq2 | I'll paste the report here again when I get back from work. The nightly should be done by then. | 19:18 |
| lubot | <kc2bez> I will keep my eyes open. | 19:18 |
| tsimonq2 | merger_libfm-qt is definitely some fun low-hanging fruit. I enabled merges from ubuntu/focal -> ubuntu/groovy -> etc. | 19:18 |
| tsimonq2 | Just in case we need to do SRUs. | 19:18 |
| tsimonq2 | At some point in the next several days I'll be making a Backports branch for Focal. | 19:19 |
| lubot | <kc2bez> Cool | 19:19 |
| tsimonq2 | I *think* the way I'm going to do that is ubuntu/focal -> ubuntu/groovy -> backports/focal -> ci/stable -> ci/unstable. | 19:20 |
| tsimonq2 | Actually, hold on, it's a one line change and I can have CI create it for me. | 19:20 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [rCIMETADATAf68e2499b8f3: Add the backports/focal branch.] tsimonq2 (Simon Quigley) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rCIMETADATAf68e2499b8f3 | 19:21 | |
| tsimonq2 | There. | 19:21 |
| tsimonq2 | There's a solid chance we'll see quite a few duplicate builds. | 19:22 |
| tsimonq2 | Bad builds could get spammy. | 19:22 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] merger_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_libfm-qt/540/ | 19:22 | |
| tsimonq2 | And nice, I see backports/focal now. | 19:24 |
| tsimonq2 | That was easy. | 19:24 |
| lubot | <kc2bez> nice | 19:24 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-powermanagement FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/46/ | 19:28 | |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> I don't get what this mean : … + git merge --ff-only ubuntu/focal … fatal: Not possible to fast-forward, aborting. … Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure | 19:32 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> in https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_libfm-qt/539/console | 19:32 |
| tsimonq2 | Basically what it's saying is, when you're on the ubuntu/groovy branch, you can't merge ubuntu/focal into ubuntu/groovy using the fast-forward merge strategy. | 19:32 |
| tsimonq2 | This means it needs to be done manually. | 19:33 |
| tsimonq2 | I don't trust CI to do it for itself, so when a merger job fails we need to fix that ourselves. | 19:33 |
| tsimonq2 | Locally you can do that but don't specify --ff-only. | 19:33 |
| tsimonq2 | Then Git can pick whatever merge strategy it thinks is suitable. | 19:33 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> i didn't knew there existed different merge strategies | 19:34 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/295/ | 19:34 | |
| tsimonq2 | https://git-scm.com/docs/git-merge#_fast_forward_merge and on | 19:35 |
| tsimonq2 | Yeah, it's interesting. | 19:35 |
| tsimonq2 | Git can do all kinds of wonderful things. | 19:35 |
| lubot | <kc2bez> tl;Dr git merge will tell you where the merge errors are. | 19:36 |
| tsimonq2 | Right. | 19:37 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-powermanagement FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/46/ | 19:43 | |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> interesting | 19:44 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/295/ | 19:44 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-build-tools ABORTED: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-build-tools/261/ | 19:44 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-powermanagement FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/46/ | 20:04 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/295/ | 20:05 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_qterminal FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_qterminal/67/ | 20:20 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/295/ | 20:25 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_qterminal FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_qterminal/68/ | 20:25 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-powermanagement FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/46/ | 20:29 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_qterminal FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_qterminal/69/ | 20:51 | |
| === hggdh-msft is now known as hggdh | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!