=== Eliz is now known as Elizabeth | ||
cpaelzer | Laney: (or anyone else who can) about cancelling tests - please cancel this regexp '\\n{"triggers": \["perl/5.30.3-1"\]' | 06:03 |
---|---|---|
cpaelzer | there is a 5.30.3-2 in groovy-proposed now so all old tests will be retried and running the other ~7k that are left is a waste of time I'd think | 06:04 |
enyc | LocutusOfBorg: "enyc, will do eventually :)" -> Thankyou =) I can personally confirm the difference with 6.1.6 to 6.1.8 debian version for example... | 06:10 |
LocutusOfBorg | enyc, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+source/virtualbox-hwe/+bug/1882106 | 06:11 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1882106 in virtualbox-hwe (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] virtualbox*" [Undecided,In progress] | 06:11 |
LocutusOfBorg | I also added a new patch on top of 6.1.8 | 06:11 |
LocutusOfBorg | I'll ask you to test, once somebody accepts the upload from the queue :) | 06:11 |
enyc | LocutusOfBorg: hrrm don't have directly installed 20.04's myself, they are other way round inside vm AT the moment! but that may change =) | 06:13 |
enyc | LocutusOfBorg: i note, too, 5.2.34 and ubuntu 18.04 ... might warrant update to cope with HWE kernel in time, maybe maybe-not ... | 06:17 |
LocutusOfBorg | enyc, I'll do it too | 06:21 |
enyc | LocutusOfBorg: more to the point, for supporting virtualizing newer linux ontop of bionic. Note 5.2 supported upstream until next month. | 06:29 |
enyc | LocutusOfBorg: any newer 5.2-18.04 i'd be in good positon to test tbh | 06:30 |
LocutusOfBorg | bionic won't have any new kernel anymore, so 5.2.48 or whatever will be the last one, specially because 6.0 is a no-go (amd64 only, I don't want to drop i386 support on bionic) | 07:09 |
enyc | LocutusOfBorg: yes, but it can provide guest-additions to a newer-kernel guest-os | 07:10 |
LocutusOfBorg | I'm talking about host, not guest | 07:11 |
enyc | LocutusOfBorg: I know you are =) uerr sorry not so waake here! | 07:11 |
LocutusOfBorg | :) | 07:12 |
* LocutusOfBorg grabs some coffee too | 07:14 | |
xnox | vorlon: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/8yXvy48SRy/ => i do not see DEB_HOST_ARCH=i386 | 09:52 |
xnox | that's from procenv autopkgtest | 09:52 |
xnox | https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-groovy/groovy/i386/p/procenv/20191130_052433_2c6be@/log.gz | 09:52 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-cuda-toolkit [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [10.1.243-5ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 10:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-cuda-toolkit [amd64] (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [10.1.243-5ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 10:21 | |
LocutusOfBorg | please reject nvidia-cuda-toolkit new binaries on ppc64el and amd64 ^^ | 10:21 |
LocutusOfBorg | new upload will come | 10:21 |
LocutusOfBorg | (from Graham, we need different binaries in Ubuntu) | 10:22 |
LocutusOfBorg | can any archive-admin please NBS-proposed cleanup "erlang-guestfs" (from src:libguestfs) thanks | 10:47 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wiki2beamer [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [0.9.5-2] (no packageset) | 11:14 | |
oSoMoN | can someone on the release team please ack https://code.launchpad.net/~osomon/britney/hints-ubuntu-i386-badtests/+merge/385113 ? | 13:10 |
blackboxsw | tjaalton: if around today and available cloudinit has an unapproved upload queued an sru for X B E and F releases per https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1881018 | 13:24 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1881018 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Focal) "sru cloud-init (19.4.33 to 20.2-45) Xenial, Bionic, Eoan and Focal" [Undecided,New] | 13:24 |
tjaalton | blackboxsw: ok | 13:24 |
=== hggdh is now known as hggdh-msft | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mozjs68 (focal-proposed/main) [68.6.0-1ubuntu1 => 68.9.0-1~ubuntu20.04.1] (i386-whitelist) (sync) | 13:41 | |
Trevinho | apw: hey, had any time to look at https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu-archive-tools/sru-review-bileto-support/+merge/364193 ? | 13:43 |
Trevinho | I did the change you requested me long time ago | 13:43 |
tjaalton | blackboxsw: each one has two uploads, which one to pick? | 14:11 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (focal-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu27.3] | 14:18 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.10.1] | 14:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:19.04.8.1] | 14:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:18.04.11.13] | 14:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [20.2-45-g5f7825e2-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] | 14:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (eoan-proposed) [20.2-45-g5f7825e2-0ubuntu1~19.10.1] | 14:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1019.21~18.04.1] (no packageset) | 15:30 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1019.21~18.04.1] | 15:32 | |
Eickmeyer | So, with 20.04.1 coming up in just under 2 months, I want to figure out why our focal dailies are failing. Something about it installing two kernels and livecd-rootfs freaking out? | 16:00 |
Eickmeyer | (Studio) | 16:00 |
blackboxsw | tjaalton: ahh missed that, checking diffs, I may have accidentally uploaded the same bits twice | 16:41 |
blackboxsw | tjaalton: bionic is 0.2-45-g5f7825e2-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 | 16:41 |
blackboxsw | make that 20.2-45-g5f7825e2-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 | 16:42 |
blackboxsw | please avoid any 20.2=-38 | 16:42 |
blackboxsw | xenial: 20.2-45-g5f7825e2-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 | 16:42 |
blackboxsw | eoan: 20.2-45-g5f7825e2-0ubuntu1~19.10.1 | 16:43 |
blackboxsw | tjaalton: and focal was the one I mistakenly uploaded the same content twice https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=cloud-init | 16:44 |
blackboxsw | either one works, that patch diff is the same | 16:44 |
blackboxsw | 20.2-45-g5f7825e2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 | 16:44 |
blackboxsw | so rejecting any 20.2-38 cloud-init is desired | 16:46 |
Laney | cpaelzer: done (late, I was on PTO today) | 17:31 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.1 => 3.36.3-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (desktop-core, desktop-extra) | 17:39 | |
tjaalton | blackboxsw: I've rejected the dupes | 17:44 |
tjaalton | and old ones | 17:45 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [20.2-38-g8377897b-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] | 17:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [20.2-45-g5f7825e2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] | 17:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (eoan-proposed) [20.2-38-g8377897b-0ubuntu1~19.10.1] | 17:45 | |
xnox | ubuntu-archive please process unsual manual uploads removals https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/+bugs?field.tag=rm-signed | 18:07 |
xnox | should NBS report be extended to report on signed things? | 18:08 |
blackboxsw | thanks tjaalton | 18:08 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.1 => 3.36.3-1ubuntu1~20.04.2] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop) | 18:25 | |
apw | xnox: that is not an archive-admin thing that needs deeper access. vorlon ^ | 18:31 |
xnox | apw: some AAs have that =) | 18:35 |
xnox | but i don't know which | 18:35 |
cpaelzer | thanks Laney | 19:06 |
vorlon | apw: on vacation this week | 19:47 |
vorlon | xnox: how are you checking the environment? The DEB_HOST_ARCH is definitely set on i386 autopkgtests | 19:48 |
blackboxsw | tjaalton: I wan't sure if there was a followup plan for approving 20.2-45 for cloud-init on xenial, bionic, eoan and focal after rejecting the previous uploads? | 21:35 |
blackboxsw | I'd expect an EOW there as it's 12 or 1am local time | 21:36 |
blackboxsw | vorlon: not sure if you'll have time today to peek at the cloud-init unapproved queue for SRU X, B, E and F. we're looking to get official verification going on the cloud-init binaries version 20.2-45 for bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1881018 | 21:38 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1881018 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Focal) "sru cloud-init (19.4.33 to 20.2-45) Xenial, Bionic, Eoan and Focal" [Undecided,New] | 21:38 |
vorlon | blackboxsw: nope, on PTO today | 21:38 |
blackboxsw | ahh good man. | 21:38 |
blackboxsw | will hit folks up Monday. have a good one :) | 21:38 |
* blackboxsw misread the prior message to a-p-w | 21:39 | |
Eickmeyer | So, with 20.04.1 coming up in just under 2 months, I want to figure out why our focal dailies are failing. Something about it installing two kernels and livecd-rootfs freaking out? | 22:25 |
=== hggdh-msft is now known as hggdh | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wiki2beamer [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:16 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: php-horde [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.2.21+debian1-1] (no packageset) | 23:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hera [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0~git20200602+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 23:18 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hera [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0~git20200602+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 23:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hera [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0~git20200602+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 23:31 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hera [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0~git20200602+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 23:43 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!