=== Eliz is now known as Elizabeth
[06:03] <cpaelzer> Laney: (or anyone else who can) about cancelling tests - please cancel this regexp '\\n{"triggers": \["perl/5.30.3-1"\]'
[06:04] <cpaelzer> there is a 5.30.3-2 in groovy-proposed now so all old tests will be retried and running the other ~7k that are left is a waste of time I'd think
[06:10] <enyc> LocutusOfBorg: "enyc, will do eventually :)" -> Thankyou =) I can personally confirm the difference with 6.1.6 to 6.1.8 debian version for example...
[06:11] <LocutusOfBorg> enyc, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+source/virtualbox-hwe/+bug/1882106
[06:11] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1882106 in virtualbox-hwe (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] virtualbox*" [Undecided,In progress]
[06:11] <LocutusOfBorg> I also added a new patch on top of 6.1.8
[06:11] <LocutusOfBorg> I'll ask you to test, once somebody accepts the upload from the queue :)
[06:13] <enyc> LocutusOfBorg: hrrm don't have directly installed 20.04's myself, they are other way round inside vm AT the moment!  but that may change =)
[06:17] <enyc> LocutusOfBorg: i note, too, 5.2.34 and ubuntu 18.04 ... might warrant update to cope with  HWE kernel in time,   maybe maybe-not ...
[06:21] <LocutusOfBorg> enyc, I'll do it too
[06:29] <enyc> LocutusOfBorg: more to the point, for supporting virtualizing newer linux ontop of bionic.  Note 5.2 supported upstream until next month.
[06:30] <enyc> LocutusOfBorg: any newer 5.2-18.04 i'd be in good positon to test tbh
[07:09] <LocutusOfBorg> bionic won't have any new kernel anymore, so 5.2.48 or whatever will be the last one, specially because 6.0 is a no-go (amd64 only, I don't want to drop i386 support on bionic)
[07:10] <enyc> LocutusOfBorg: yes, but it can provide guest-additions to  a newer-kernel  guest-os
[07:11] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm talking about host, not guest
[07:11] <enyc> LocutusOfBorg: I know you are =)   uerr sorry not so waake here!
[07:12] <LocutusOfBorg> :)
[07:14]  * LocutusOfBorg grabs some coffee too
[09:52] <xnox> vorlon:  https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/8yXvy48SRy/ => i do not see DEB_HOST_ARCH=i386
[09:52] <xnox> that's from procenv autopkgtest
[09:52] <xnox> https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-groovy/groovy/i386/p/procenv/20191130_052433_2c6be@/log.gz
[10:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-cuda-toolkit [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [10.1.243-5ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-cuda-toolkit [amd64] (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [10.1.243-5ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[10:21] <LocutusOfBorg> please reject nvidia-cuda-toolkit new binaries on ppc64el and amd64 ^^
[10:21] <LocutusOfBorg> new upload will come
[10:22] <LocutusOfBorg> (from Graham, we need different binaries in Ubuntu)
[10:47] <LocutusOfBorg> can any archive-admin please NBS-proposed cleanup "erlang-guestfs" (from src:libguestfs) thanks
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wiki2beamer [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [0.9.5-2] (no packageset)
[13:10] <oSoMoN> can someone on the release team please ack https://code.launchpad.net/~osomon/britney/hints-ubuntu-i386-badtests/+merge/385113 ?
[13:24] <blackboxsw> tjaalton:  if around today and available cloudinit has an unapproved upload queued an sru for X B E and F releases per https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1881018
[13:24] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1881018 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Focal) "sru cloud-init (19.4.33 to 20.2-45) Xenial, Bionic, Eoan and Focal" [Undecided,New]
[13:24] <tjaalton> blackboxsw: ok
=== hggdh is now known as hggdh-msft
[13:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mozjs68 (focal-proposed/main) [68.6.0-1ubuntu1 => 68.9.0-1~ubuntu20.04.1] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[13:43] <Trevinho> apw: hey, had any time to look at https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu-archive-tools/sru-review-bileto-support/+merge/364193 ?
[13:43] <Trevinho> I did the change you requested me long time ago
[14:11] <tjaalton> blackboxsw: each one has two uploads, which one to pick?
[14:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (focal-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu27.3]
[14:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.10.1]
[14:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:19.04.8.1]
[14:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:18.04.11.13]
[14:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [20.2-45-g5f7825e2-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[14:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (eoan-proposed) [20.2-45-g5f7825e2-0ubuntu1~19.10.1]
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1019.21~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1019.21~18.04.1]
[16:00] <Eickmeyer> So, with 20.04.1 coming up in just under 2 months, I want to figure out why our focal dailies are failing. Something about it installing two kernels and livecd-rootfs freaking out?
[16:00] <Eickmeyer> (Studio)
[16:41] <blackboxsw> tjaalton: ahh missed that,  checking diffs, I may have accidentally uploaded the same bits twice
[16:41] <blackboxsw> tjaalton: bionic is 0.2-45-g5f7825e2-0ubuntu1~18.04.1
[16:42] <blackboxsw> make that 20.2-45-g5f7825e2-0ubuntu1~18.04.1
[16:42] <blackboxsw> please  avoid any 20.2=-38
[16:42] <blackboxsw> xenial: 20.2-45-g5f7825e2-0ubuntu1~16.04.1
[16:43] <blackboxsw> eoan: 20.2-45-g5f7825e2-0ubuntu1~19.10.1
[16:44] <blackboxsw> tjaalton: and focal was the one I mistakenly uploaded the same content twice https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=cloud-init
[16:44] <blackboxsw> either one works, that patch diff is the same
[16:44] <blackboxsw>  	20.2-45-g5f7825e2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1
[16:46] <blackboxsw> so rejecting any 20.2-38 cloud-init is desired
[17:31] <Laney> cpaelzer: done (late, I was on PTO today)
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.1 => 3.36.3-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (desktop-core, desktop-extra)
[17:44] <tjaalton> blackboxsw: I've rejected the dupes
[17:45] <tjaalton> and old ones
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [20.2-38-g8377897b-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [20.2-45-g5f7825e2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1]
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (eoan-proposed) [20.2-38-g8377897b-0ubuntu1~19.10.1]
[18:07] <xnox> ubuntu-archive please process unsual manual uploads removals https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/+bugs?field.tag=rm-signed
[18:08] <xnox> should NBS report be extended to report on signed things?
[18:08] <blackboxsw> thanks tjaalton
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.1 => 3.36.3-1ubuntu1~20.04.2] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[18:31] <apw> xnox: that is not an archive-admin thing that needs deeper access. vorlon ^
[18:35] <xnox> apw:  some AAs have that =)
[18:35] <xnox> but i don't know which
[19:06] <cpaelzer> thanks Laney
[19:47] <vorlon> apw: on vacation this week
[19:48] <vorlon> xnox: how are you checking the environment?  The DEB_HOST_ARCH is definitely set on i386 autopkgtests
[21:35] <blackboxsw> tjaalton: I wan't sure if there was a followup plan for approving 20.2-45 for cloud-init on xenial, bionic, eoan and focal  after rejecting the previous uploads?
[21:36] <blackboxsw> I'd expect an EOW there as it's 12 or 1am local time
[21:38] <blackboxsw> vorlon: not sure if you'll have time today to peek at the cloud-init unapproved queue for SRU X, B, E and F. we're looking to get official verification going on the cloud-init binaries version 20.2-45 for bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1881018
[21:38] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1881018 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Focal) "sru cloud-init (19.4.33 to 20.2-45) Xenial, Bionic, Eoan and Focal" [Undecided,New]
[21:38] <vorlon> blackboxsw: nope, on PTO today
[21:38] <blackboxsw> ahh good man.
[21:38] <blackboxsw> will hit folks up Monday. have a good one :)
[21:39]  * blackboxsw misread the prior message to a-p-w
[22:25] <Eickmeyer> So, with 20.04.1 coming up in just under 2 months, I want to figure out why our focal dailies are failing. Something about it installing two kernels and livecd-rootfs freaking out?
=== hggdh-msft is now known as hggdh
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wiki2beamer [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: php-horde [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.2.21+debian1-1] (no packageset)
[23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hera [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0~git20200602+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hera [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0~git20200602+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hera [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0~git20200602+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hera [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0~git20200602+dfsg-1] (no packageset)