| doko | sergiodj: yes, please drop the Python2 stuff again | 06:42 |
|---|---|---|
| santa_ | rbalint: hi, I got a crash in unattended-upgrades and I think I have a patch, if you have some time I would like to discuss how to get it fixed in ubuntu | 09:50 |
| rbalint | santa_, hi, sure, how is it crashing? | 09:51 |
| santa_ | rbalint: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1883082 | 09:51 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1883082 in unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) "Crash when using Package-Whitelist-Strict" [Undecided,New] | 09:51 |
| santa_ | just reported a min ago | 09:51 |
| rbalint | santa_, that's fresh :-) | 09:51 |
| santa_ | it always crashes with strict whitelist | 09:51 |
| santa_ | I think I know the cause and I have a possible patch for this | 09:52 |
| rbalint | santa_, ok, please attach it to the bug | 09:52 |
| santa_ | sure | 09:53 |
| rbalint | santa_, thanks, the fix seems simple and if you attach it i'm including it in the next upload + sru and give the credit since you found the fix first :-) | 10:00 |
| santa_ | rbalint: ok, that was what I was going to ask - SRU for focal; what would be the version you are going to use? | 10:01 |
| santa_ | because I'm going to build a custom package in a PPA ;) | 10:02 |
| santa_ | would be 2.3-0ubuntu0.1 ? | 10:02 |
| santa_ | 2.3-0ubuntu0.1 for focal SRU I mean | 10:03 |
| rbalint | 2.3.0ubuntu0.1 i think, since it is a native package | 10:03 |
| rbalint | santa_, out of curiosity why do you use strict whitelist? | 10:04 |
| santa_ | rbalint: I'm working for a company which requested this | 10:05 |
| santa_ | we used to have a home-made script to do this, but I'm rewrking the thing, if possible, with u-a | 10:05 |
| santa_ | * reworking | 10:06 |
| santa_ | rbalint: the thing needed is having just a small set of packages being upgraded automatically (firefox, openssh server, ...) and the rest manually if I'm not mistaken | 10:07 |
| rbalint | santa_, thanks, make sense, i'd just would like to understand how u-u is being used in the wild | 10:08 |
| santa_ | sure np | 10:09 |
| Laney | juliank: on a different note ;-) | 10:21 |
| Laney | can you help me quickly to make https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/britney2/-/blob/master/britney2/policies/policy.py#L1032 work with xenial's python3-apt? | 10:21 |
| Laney | looks like that has changed signature since | 10:21 |
| juliank | Laney: you're backporting? | 10:37 |
| Laney | juliank: nope, trying to run britney on snakefruit which is xenial | 10:37 |
| juliank | Laney: The architecture option does not exist on xenial | 10:37 |
| juliank | Laney: So I'm not sure this can be run on xenial, because that does the [...] architecture filtering | 10:38 |
| Laney | hmm | 10:39 |
| juliank | you might have to implement architecture wildcards yourself and pre-mangle input | 10:39 |
| Laney | was hoping for a way to do it anyway :P | 10:39 |
| juliank | Laney: Ah | 10:39 |
| juliank | Laney: You can set APT::Architecture before calling it on xenail | 10:39 |
| juliank | Laney: But like restore it afterwards | 10:40 |
| juliank | native_arch = apt_pkg.config["APT::Architecture"] | 10:41 |
| juliank | apt_pkg.config["APT::Architecture"] = arch | 10:41 |
| juliank | parse_src_depends(block, False) | 10:41 |
| juliank | apt_pkg.config["APT::Architecture"] = native_arch | 10:41 |
| Laney | ah, that's nice if it works, let me try it | 10:42 |
| Laney | in an except:, maybe upstream will take it | 10:42 |
| Laney | silly ancient machines | 10:42 |
| Laney | neat, seems to be working | 10:54 |
| Laney | merci juliank | 10:54 |
| paride | Hi! Groovy live-server ISO images are successfully being built for all the 4 archs: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/groovy/ubuntu-server-live | 11:33 |
| paride | but the ppc64 image is not published here: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily-live/pending/ | 11:33 |
| paride | It use to be up to May 28. | 11:34 |
| paride | any idea of what could be wrong? | 11:35 |
| cjwatson | https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu-server/groovy/daily-live-20200611.log | 11:35 |
| cjwatson | absurdly hard to read but I think the relevant error is: | 11:35 |
| cjwatson | xorriso : FAILURE : -as mkisofs: Unsupported option '--netatalk' | 11:35 |
| cjwatson | I think xnox was working on a xorriso upgrade at some point? | 11:36 |
| paride | yeah I saw his branch | 11:37 |
| paride | https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/debian-cd/use-xorriso/+merge/384480 | 11:40 |
| paride | the date of the latest comments matches the last day ppc64 images were produced | 11:40 |
| paride | cjwatson, thanks for pointing me to the right point in the build log. fiy this is the problem: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/+bug/1883103 | 12:25 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1883103 in Ubuntu CD Images "Switch to xorriso causes failure in ppc64 image generation" [Undecided,New] | 12:25 |
| paride | xnox, vorlon, ^^ | 12:25 |
| * cjwatson nods | 12:26 | |
| === ben_r_ is now known as ben_r | ||
| xnox | tah | 13:46 |
| xnox | cjwatson: paride: i am in progress redoing ppc64el using cd-boot-images. I'll try to push a branch for that asap then. | 13:47 |
| paride | xnox, which does not use --netatalk | 13:51 |
| paride | so maybe it's not needed after all | 13:52 |
| paride | could it be a legacy thing needed to support Apple PPC hardware? | 14:05 |
| xnox | it is | 14:19 |
| xnox | the new cd-boot-images for ppc64el just has a couple of files and that's it, without any magic options | 14:20 |
| xnox | and i did test it locally and it does boot | 14:20 |
| santa_ | rbalint: I've just attached a patch for a u-a SRU, the first one was cheesy so please ignore it ;) | 15:02 |
| santa_ | I plan to use it in the next few days, let's hope it works as expected | 15:03 |
| Laney | xnox: oh yay for submodules | 15:04 |
| * Laney grinds teeth | 15:04 | |
| Laney | :) | 15:04 |
| xnox | Laney: ooooooh is that good or bad? | 15:11 |
| Laney | xnox: hahah well I've not enjoyed using them up to now | 15:12 |
| Laney | but still, thanks for the work | 15:12 |
| cjwatson | Better than what was there before, probably worse than subtrees :) | 15:12 |
| * xnox played a lot for with --prefix subtree & submodules | 15:12 | |
| Laney | did you fork all of the repos into Launchpad or something | 15:12 |
| cjwatson | The main problem with submodules is that the UI is awful even for git | 15:12 |
| Laney | sorry for asking instead of checking | 15:12 |
| xnox | cjwatson: so subtree wouldn't allow to rebase things nicely. Unless something like git-dpm to do the "rebase, but actually git merge" | 15:13 |
| xnox | with subtree integration. | 15:13 |
| cjwatson | And likes to sometimes leave submodules mysteriously out of date | 15:13 |
| xnox | Laney: cjwatson: yes, i did setup git->git for all of the d-i projects, and then added ~ubuntu-installer team repos based off that, with ubuntu delta, on top of the right debian tag. | 15:13 |
| xnox | Laney: cjwatson: so i can setup a "subtree" based git repo with all of those things too, I guess for evaluation. | 15:14 |
| cjwatson | It can absolutely be handled, it's just one of those things where you need to pay closer attention than average at the client end | 15:14 |
| cjwatson | (Also doesn't work with recipes and it's not clear how to make it work, though you may or may not care about that - see https://code.launchpad.net/~tintou/git-build-recipe/+git/git-build-recipe-1/+merge/351699) | 15:15 |
| xnox | right, in the worst case scenario of subtree "rebase" one just removes a subtree and merges in a new one. | 16:49 |
| bdmurray | vorlon: looking at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PlusOneMaintenanceTeam/Status and "Things to pick from" nautilus-python has migrated right? I'm wondering how up to date this is | 17:08 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: only as up-to-date as the last +1 maint person who updated it :) | 18:09 |
| arnatious | I'm trying to figure out how to make this SRU: flake8 released an update supporting python3.8 only after we released focal. Should I just make the issue "This valid python code is failing <insert 3.8 language feature>, flake8 3.8 addresses this?" | 19:37 |
| Odd_Bloke | arnatious: I'm not 100% sure I understand the question; could you explain the issue in a little more detail? | 19:58 |
| arnatious | Yeah - the python3-flake8 package doesn't support all of python 3.8 as-is | 19:59 |
| arnatious | Odd_Bloke flake8 released the update adding 3.8 support in early May, after we released focal. | 20:00 |
| arnatious | We're on python3-flake8 3.7.9, PyPi has 3.8.x now. flake8 is supposed to keep minor version in sync with python | 20:01 |
| Odd_Bloke | Aha, right, I hadn't understood you were talking about SRUing flake8 itself, thanks for the clarification! Do you have a bug for this? | 20:01 |
| arnatious | I'm filing one, I was wondering if saying ^ that would be enough for a bug report | 20:02 |
| Odd_Bloke | I'm not a member of the SRU team, so I'm not the best person to be answering that specifically I'm afraid. | 20:06 |
| === lfaraone_ is now known as lfaraone | ||
| RAOF | arnatious: I *am* a member of the SRU team, and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#SRU_Bug_Template is a good start. | 23:32 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!