callmepk | good morning | 00:53 |
---|---|---|
=== sa-ghosts_BNC is now known as sa-ghosts | ||
oSoMoN | good morning desktoppers | 04:38 |
duflu | Morning oSoMoN | 05:25 |
oSoMoN | hey duflu | 05:31 |
seb128 | goood morning desktopers | 05:42 |
duflu | Morning seb128 | 05:52 |
seb128 | hey duflu, happy friday! how are you? getting ready for the weekend? :) | 05:52 |
didrocks | good morning | 05:52 |
duflu | seb128, Happy Friday. Yeah I will enjoy the rest. How are you? | 05:53 |
duflu | Hi didrocks | 05:53 |
didrocks | hey duflu | 05:53 |
seb128 | lut didrocks | 05:54 |
seb128 | duflu, I'm fine, a bit tired but it's friday so it's alright, should be alright after some coffee | 05:55 |
didrocks | salut seb128, bon vendredi | 05:56 |
seb128 | didrocks, merci, à toi également ! | 06:02 |
didrocks | 'ci | 06:03 |
pieq | Hello everyone! | 06:16 |
pieq | I noticed a refugar "+1 maintenance report" on the ubuntu-devel mailing list, but I'm not sure what it's all about exactly. Is there a Wiki page or something to explain it? | 06:17 |
seb128 | pieq, hey, yes, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PlusOneMaintenanceTeam | 06:17 |
seb128 | pieq, the wiki page is old but that initiative got some staffing again recently | 06:19 |
seb128 | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PlusOneMaintenanceTeam/Status also | 06:19 |
pieq | merci seb128 ! | 06:20 |
seb128 | de rien :) | 06:20 |
ricotz | good morning desktopers! | 06:27 |
ricotz | oSoMoN, hey, am I correct that you filed a bug regarding a backport of python 3.6 to xenial? | 06:28 |
ricotz | oSoMoN, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1644845 | 06:30 |
ubot5 | Mozilla bug 1644845 in General "Unable to build with python 2.7/3.5 on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS" [S3,Resolved: wontfix] | 06:30 |
seb128 | hey ricotz, how are you? happy friday! | 06:38 |
ricotz | seb128, hi, thanks, I am fine, looking forward to the weekend | 06:46 |
ricotz | how are you? | 06:46 |
duflu | Hi also pieq and ricotz | 06:54 |
marcustomlinson | hey duflu oSoMoN seb128 didrocks pieq ricotz | 06:58 |
duflu | 'lo marcustomlinson | 07:03 |
oSoMoN | good morning seb128, didrocks, pieq, ricotz, marcustomlinson | 07:16 |
oSoMoN | ricotz, I didn't file that bug, but I discussed the problem with other ubuntu devs, and the consensus was not to try backporting, instead we should distro-patch firefox to build with python 3.5 | 07:17 |
didrocks | hey marcustomlinson, oSoMoN | 07:17 |
ricotz | oSoMoN, ack | 07:23 |
seb128 | ricotz, a bit tired but alright, I'm also looking forward some extra rest in the weekend :) | 07:39 |
seb128 | lut oSoMoN | 07:39 |
KGB-0 | mutter ubuntu/master Daniel van Vugt * [open] merge request !65: Fix blurry wallpaper (upstream mutter!1003) (LP: #1862308) * https://deb.li/3tEpd | 10:02 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1862308 in mutter (Ubuntu) "Desktop wallpaper is slightly blurry" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1862308 | 10:02 |
duflu | Feel free to ignore that for a while because I'm starting my weekend | 10:08 |
duflu | o/ | 10:08 |
seb128 | kenvandine, do we have any process to flag snapd issues we might consider important/that need debugging? | 13:34 |
seb128 | kenvandine, bug #1858636 sounds like one of those, comment #34 sounds interesting | 13:34 |
ubot5 | bug 1858636 in chromium-browser (Ubuntu) "snapd generates incomplete fontconfig caches, result in emoji rendering issue in chromium" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1858636 | 13:34 |
seb128 | or #29 rather | 13:35 |
* kenvandine looks | 13:35 | |
seb128 | the cache generated by snapd lacks NotoColorEmoji.ttf comapred to the one done by deb triggers | 13:35 |
seb128 | kenvandine, note that duflu wrote in there that it breaks chrome (deb) for him, so it's not a problem with use of snaps but rather snapd which doesn't generate a cache properly matching which is available | 13:38 |
seb128 | fontconfig keeps being a fun topic :/ | 13:38 |
kenvandine | seb128: indeed... no fun at all | 13:40 |
kenvandine | chromium isn't using the platform snap and doesn't include NotoColorEmoji.ttf in the snap | 13:41 |
seb128 | kenvandine, it's not about chromium, read what I just wrote on the channel | 13:41 |
kenvandine | yeah | 13:41 |
kenvandine | i did | 13:41 |
seb128 | snapd overwrite the /var/cache/fontconfig/ cache right? | 13:42 |
kenvandine | i didn't think that was the case | 13:42 |
kenvandine | but it must be | 13:42 |
seb128 | seems like it does it in a way which is buggy and as a result even debs are buggy | 13:42 |
seb128 | if it doesn't then the comments don't make sense | 13:42 |
kenvandine | right | 13:42 |
kenvandine | it is very interesting | 13:43 |
kenvandine | my most recently modified cache files end in cache-6 | 13:43 |
seb128 | is there a way to force the snapd cache refresh to see what it gives? | 13:43 |
kenvandine | the older ones are cache-7 | 13:43 |
kenvandine | that would be a question for mvo | 13:43 |
kenvandine | seb128: i think you are right... | 13:45 |
seb128 | kenvandine, I tagged it rls-ff-incoming, I don't think anyone owning snapd follows that process though, what's the right way to raise the issue to the snap team? | 13:50 |
seb128 | oSoMoN, ^ fyi | 13:50 |
seb128 | kenvandine, I confirmed by doing | 13:55 |
seb128 | $ rm /var/cache/fontconfig | 13:56 |
seb128 | $ snap refresh --edge core | 13:56 |
seb128 | $ fc-cat /var/cache/fontconfig/* | grep NotoColorE | 13:56 |
seb128 | -> not mention | 13:56 |
seb128 | $ sudo dpkg-reconfigure fontconfig | 13:56 |
seb128 | $ fc-cat /var/cache/fontconfig/* | grep NotoColorE | 13:56 |
seb128 | -> things listed | 13:57 |
kenvandine | please add that to the bug report | 13:57 |
kenvandine | and i'll make sure they see it | 13:57 |
oSoMoN | seb128, ack, thanks for raising it | 13:59 |
seb128 | kenvandine, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1858636/comments/37 | 13:59 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1858636 in chromium-browser (Ubuntu) "snapd generates incomplete fontconfig caches, result in emoji rendering issue in chromium" [Medium,Confirmed] | 13:59 |
oSoMoN | it's a funny and tricky bug, and mgedmin did a very good job of investigating it in depth | 14:00 |
seb128 | indeed | 14:00 |
seb128 | nice that we made a step forward | 14:01 |
kenvandine | indeed | 14:01 |
kenvandine | this is pretty bad | 14:01 |
seb128 | it's annoying and had regular comments | 14:01 |
oSoMoN | kenvandine, seen that? https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/firefox-snap-77-cannot-download-anything/18167 | 14:45 |
kenvandine | oSoMoN: thank, i hadn't seen that | 14:56 |
kenvandine | oSoMoN: i don't think they really meant download, it was save | 14:57 |
kenvandine | downloads shouldn't touch the portals | 14:57 |
kenvandine | but it does want portals for the file chooser | 14:57 |
oSoMoN | yes | 15:05 |
oSoMoN | well by default firefox always prompts the user where to save a downloaded file | 15:06 |
oSoMoN | so the file chooser is invoked, unless the user has ticked a checkbox to always perform the same action | 15:07 |
kenvandine | oh it does? | 15:09 |
kenvandine | hmm | 15:09 |
kenvandine | if he's really running bionic he should have had the portal packages too | 15:09 |
kenvandine | which is weird | 15:09 |
hellsworth | good morning desktopers | 16:04 |
oSoMoN | hey hellsworth | 16:26 |
hellsworth | hi there | 16:28 |
=== ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch | ||
kenvandine | oSoMoN: i've confirmed downloads work fine on stock 18.04 | 17:24 |
kenvandine | oSoMoN: however... save as does not | 17:24 |
kenvandine | i've reproduced the same denial | 17:24 |
kenvandine | it's being denied by snapd | 17:24 |
oSoMoN | so the problem is valid, although incorrectly worded | 17:25 |
kenvandine | yeah | 17:25 |
kenvandine | oSoMoN, interestingly i reproduced it on stock 18.04.4, then on fully updated 18.04.4 (including latest core from stable) which has snapd 2.45 | 17:38 |
kenvandine | i installed snapd 2.45.1 and it worked | 17:38 |
* kenvandine comments on forum | 17:39 | |
=== ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson | ||
oSoMoN | have a good week-end everyone | 19:44 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!